URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
YOUTH VIOLENCE
Perception vs. Reality
Prepared by Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D.THE URBAN INSTITUTE
Program on Law & Behavior
July 1999
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
The Juvenile Court System Has Been Widely Criticized in Recent Years
• Juvenile courts are perceived as weak and ineffective.
• The term “juvenile justice” has almost become a synonym for soft, lenient, and outmoded.
• This perception has encouraged lawmakers to make profound changes in juvenile crime policy.
• The juvenile justice system is now more formalized and adversarial and far more youth are sent to adult court.
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
Conventional Wisdom Suggests:
Crime policy should focus on juveniles because they are responsible for most of our violent crime problems.
Although a common perception,this is wrong, or at least misleading.
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
Percent Under Age 18 in 1997
U.S. Population 26%
Total Arrests 19%
Violent Index Arrests 17%
Arrests for Murder 14%
Property Index Arrests 35%
Violence is Not Disproportionately a “Juvenile” Problem
Source: Urban Institute analysis of data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
Policy focuses on juveniles because:
But, some of the focus is misplaced:• Data analyses can distort the role of juveniles in violence.
• It is common to highlight the juvenile crime problem by contrasting it with adult crime.
• This masks the fact that young adults (ages 18-23) are violent at a higher rate than juveniles.
• Juveniles are the leading edge of the problem; crime and violence start to emerge during the teen years.
• Prevention and early intervention must focus on juveniles.
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
Juvenile Murder Rate Spiked in 1990s
Source: Urban Institute analysis of data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
19971994199119881985198219791976
Arrests per 100,000
Juvenile Murder Arrests
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
Juvenile Murder Rate Spiked in 1990s
Source: Urban Institute analysis of data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
19971994199119881985198219791976
Arrests per 100,000
Juvenile Murder Arrests
Adult Murder Arrests
The contrast between juvenile arrests and adult arrests leads us to conclude that juveniles were responsible for the increase in murder arrests from 1984 to 1994.
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
Juvenile Murder Rate Spiked in 1990s
Source: Urban Institute analysis of data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
19971994199119881985198219791976
Arrests per 100,000
Juvenile Murder Arrests
Adult Murder Arrests
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45Age at Arrest
But, note what the term “juvenile” means.
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45Age at Arrest
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45Age at Arrest
Juvenile
Each State sets the age of juvenile court jurisdiction, usually under 18.
Anyone arrested under that age is a juvenile.
Those over that age are adults.
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45Age at Arrest
Juvenile Adult
“Youth”
But “adults” have widely varying arrest rates.
Most violent crimes, in fact, are committed by “youth” in theirlate teens and early twenties.
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45Age at Arrest
This can be seen by looking at the per capita rate of arrests forViolent Index Crimes by age.
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45Age at Arrest
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45Age at Arrest
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45Age at Arrest
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Violent Index CrimesArrests per 100,000
1,000
600
800
200
400
Age at Arrest
1997
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Violent Index CrimesArrests per 100,000
1,000
600
800
200
400
Age at Arrest
1997
Source: Urban Institute analysis of FBI data. Note: Arrest data are not available by single years of age below age 15 or above age 24.
Among 13 and 14-year-olds, there were 360 arrests for every 100,000 13 and 14-year-olds in the population in 1997.
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Violent Index CrimesArrests per 100,000
1,000
600
800
200
400
Age at Arrest
1997
Source: Urban Institute analysis of FBI data. Note: Arrest data are not available by single years of age below age 15 or above age 24.
The rate climbed to nearly 600 arrests per 100,000 among 15-year-olds.
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Violent Index CrimesArrests per 100,000
1,000
600
800
200
400
Age at Arrest
1997
Source: Urban Institute analysis of FBI data. Note: Arrest data are not available by single years of age below age 15 or above age 24.
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Violent Index CrimesArrests per 100,000
1,000
600
800
200
400
Age at Arrest
1997
Source: Urban Institute analysis of FBI data. Note: Arrest data are not available by single years of age below age 15 or above age 24.
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Violent Index CrimesArrests per 100,000
1,000
600
800
200
400
Age at Arrest
1997
Source: Urban Institute analysis of FBI data. Note: Arrest data are not available by single years of age below age 15 or above age 24.
The rate continued to climb until peaking at age 18, and then started to fall.
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Violent Index CrimesArrests per 100,000
1,000
600
800
200
400
Age at Arrest
1997
Source: Urban Institute analysis of FBI data. Note: Arrest data are not available by single years of age below age 15 or above age 24.
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Violent Index CrimesArrests per 100,000
1,000
600
800
200
400
Age at Arrest
1997
Source: Urban Institute analysis of FBI data. Note: Arrest data are not available by single years of age below age 15 or above age 24.
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Violent Index CrimesArrests per 100,000
1,000
600
800
200
400
Age at Arrest
1997
Source: Urban Institute analysis of FBI data. Note: Arrest data are not available by single years of age below age 15 or above age 24.
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Violent Index CrimesArrests per 100,000
1,000
600
800
200
400
Age at Arrest
1997
Source: Urban Institute analysis of FBI data. Note: Arrest data are not available by single years of age below age 15 or above age 24.
This “age-crime curve” confirms that the rate of violent crime peaks in the late teen years and early twenties.
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Violent Index CrimesArrests per 100,000
1,000
600
800
200
400
Age at Arrest
1997
Source: Urban Institute analysis of FBI data. Note: Arrest data are not available by single years of age below age 15 or above age 24.
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Violent Index CrimesArrests per 100,000
1,000
600
800
200
400
Age at Arrest
Juvenile
Adult
1997
Source: Urban Institute analysis of FBI data. Note: Arrest data are not available by single years of age below age 15 or above age 24.
Most of the peak crime years are in the adult category.
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Violent Index CrimesArrests per 100,000
1,000
600
800
200
400
Age at Arrest
Juvenile
Adult
1997
Source: Urban Institute analysis of FBI data. Note: Arrest data are not available by single years of age below age 15 or above age 24.
Combining the high-crime rates of younger adults with the low rates of older adults obscures the fact that violent crime rates are veryhigh among young adults.
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Violent Index CrimesArrests per 100,000
1,000
600
800
200
400
Age at Arrest
Juvenile
Adult
1997
Source: Urban Institute analysis of FBI data. Note: Arrest data are not available by single years of age below age 15 or above age 24.
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
The effect this would have on policy is clear if we examine how the age-crime curve for murder changed during the crime wave of the late 1980s and early 1990s.
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
Murder
Source: Urban Institute analysis of data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
1980
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Arrests per 100,000
This was the shape of the age-crime curve for murder as of 1980.
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
Murder
Source: Urban Institute analysis of data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
1980
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Arrests per 100,000
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
Murder
Source: Urban Institute analysis of data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
1985
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Arrests per 100,000
By 1985, not much had changed.
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
Murder
Source: Urban Institute analysis of data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
1985
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Arrests per 100,000
Sharp increases appearedduring the late 1980s.
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
Murder
Source: Urban Institute analysis of data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
1985
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Arrests per 100,000
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
Murder
Source: Urban Institute analysis of data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
1986
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Arrests per 100,000
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
Murder
Source: Urban Institute analysis of data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
1987
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Arrests per 100,000
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
Murder
Source: Urban Institute analysis of data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
1988
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Arrests per 100,000
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
Murder
Source: Urban Institute analysis of data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
1989
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Arrests per 100,000
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
Murder
Source: Urban Institute analysis of data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
1990
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Arrests per 100,000
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
Murder
Source: Urban Institute analysis of data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
1991
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Arrests per 100,000
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
Murder
Source: Urban Institute analysis of data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
1992
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Arrests per 100,000
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
Murder
Source: Urban Institute analysis of data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
1993
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Arrests per 100,000
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
Murder
Source: Urban Institute analysis of data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
1994
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Arrests per 100,000
By 1994, policymakers and the public were very concerned about youth crime.
When analysts compared juvenile and adultmurder rates, the answer seemed clear:
Change in arrest rate for murder: 1980-1994 Juveniles +108% Adults -12%
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
Murder
Source: Urban Institute analysis of data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
1994
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Arrests per 100,000
This comparison was common in media stories about the problem of juvenile violence.
FromCrime Time BombUS News & World Report
March 25, 1996
by Ted Gest with Victoria Pope
It seemed as if the juvenile justice system was failing to control crime.
Most States reacted by making radical changesin their juvenile justice systems and sendingmore juvenile offenders to criminal court.
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
Murder
Source: Urban Institute analysis of data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
1994
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Arrests per 100,000
The murder rate subsided between 1995 and 1997.
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
Murder
Source: Urban Institute analysis of data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
1995
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Arrests per 100,000
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
Murder
Source: Urban Institute analysis of data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
1996
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Arrests per 100,000
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
Murder
Source: Urban Institute analysis of data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
1997
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Arrests per 100,000
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
Look more closely at the change in murder arrest rates between 1980 and the peak year, 1994.
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
Murder
1994
Source: Urban Institute analysis of data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Arrests per 100,000
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
Murder
19941980
Source: Urban Institute analysis of data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Arrests per 100,000
Rates actually declined between 1980 and 1994 for people over age 23.
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
Murder
19941980
Source: Urban Institute analysis of data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Arrests per 100,000
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
Murder
19941980
Source: Urban Institute analysis of data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Arrests per 100,000
All of the increase was among young people.
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
Murder
19941980
Source: Urban Institute analysis of data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Arrests per 100,000
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
Murder
19941980
Source: Urban Institute analysis of data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Arrests per 100,000
But rates increased among both young adults and juveniles.
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
Consider the actual increase in murder arrests from 1980 to 1994.
How much of the increase was dueto changes in murders by juveniles?
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
Age-Specific Differences in Murder Arrests
Source: Urban Institute analysis of data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
-1,000
-500
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
13-17 18-23 24-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64
Age at Arrest
1994 versus 1980
Again, the increase in murder arrests was due to growth among juveniles and young adults, not juveniles alone.
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
Finally, the same effect can be seen in studies of homicide by firearms versus other methods.
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996
Known Homicide Offenders: Age 10-17
Juvenile Murderers
With Gun
Other Methods
Source: Snyder, Howard N., and Finnegan, Terrence A. (1998) Easy Access to the FBI's Supplementary Homicide Reports: 1980-1996 [Data presentation and analysis package]. Pittsburgh, PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice [producer]. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention [distributor].
This graphic was of great concern during the mid-1990s, as it shows how the increase in juvenile homicides through 1994 was entirely gun related.
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996
Known Homicide Offenders: Age 10-17
Juvenile Murderers
With Gun
Other Methods
Source: Snyder, Howard N., and Finnegan, Terrence A. (1998) Easy Access to the FBI's Supplementary Homicide Reports: 1980-1996 [Data presentation and analysis package]. Pittsburgh, PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice [producer]. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention [distributor].
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996
Known Homicide Offenders: Age 18+
Adult Murderers (Age 18 and older)
With Gun
Other Methods
Source: Snyder, Howard N., and Finnegan, Terrence A. (1998) Easy Access to the FBI's Supplementary Homicide Reports: 1980-1996 [Data presentation and analysis package]. Pittsburgh, PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice [producer]. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention [distributor].
When the same analysis was applied to all adults, the difference in gun and non-gun homicides was not as stark, suggesting that there was something distinct and disturbing about “juveniles.”
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996
Known Homicide Offenders: Age 18+
Adult Murderers (Age 18 and older)
With Gun
Other Methods
Source: Snyder, Howard N., and Finnegan, Terrence A. (1998) Easy Access to the FBI's Supplementary Homicide Reports: 1980-1996 [Data presentation and analysis package]. Pittsburgh, PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice [producer]. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention [distributor].
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
The contrast between juveniles and adults obscured the fact that young adults had the same pattern.
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996
Known Homicide Offenders: Age 10-17
Age 10-17
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996
Known Homicide Offenders: Age 25+
Age 25 & older
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996
Known Homicide Offenders: Age 18-24
Age 18-24
Juvenile, Youth, and Adult Murderers
Source: Snyder, Howard N., and Finnegan, Terrence A. (1998) Easy Access to the FBI's Supplementary Homicide Reports: 1980-1996 [Data presentation and analysis package]. Pittsburgh, PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice [producer]. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention [distributor].
With gun
Other method
Young adults had virtually the same patternas juveniles. Note also that the number of homicide offenders in the young adult groupwas twice that of the juvenile age group.
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
Policy Implications
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
Perception Reality
Juvenile violence is our primary crime problem.
Real problem is violenceby “youth” (age 15-23).
To control violent crime, we need to send more juveniles to adult court.
Adult jurisdiction is not a panacea for violent crime.(If it were, crime rates would start to fall at age 17 or 18 rather than at age 20 or 21.)
To control violent crime,we need to fix our juvenile court system.
Juvenile courts are only part of the solution. We need better programs for youth in general.
URBAN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON, DCWASHINGTON, DC
The Urban Institute is a nonprofit, nonpartisan policy research organization established in Washington, D.C. in 1968. Its objectives are to sharpen thinking about society’s problems and efforts to solve them, improve government decisions and their implementation, and increase citizens’ awareness about important public choices.
Any views expressed here are those of the author and should not be attributed to The Urban Institute, its trustees, or funders.
For more information:Jeffrey A. ButtsProgram on Law & BehaviorThe Urban Institute2100 M Street, NWWashington, DC 20037or
The Urban Institute, Office of Public Affairs(202) [email protected]