Valuing IT InvestmentsValuing IT Investments
Ken PeffersUNLV
October 2004
Ken PeffersUNLV
October 2004
What’s different about IT Investments?
What’s different about IT Investments?
• Aren’t they just capital goods investments?• Value of knowledge
– Relationship of information and information processing to knowledge
– Intelligence scaling
• Technology acceleration – Transforming business processes– Transforming products– Transforming the industry– Moore’s Law
• Aren’t they just capital goods investments?• Value of knowledge
– Relationship of information and information processing to knowledge
– Intelligence scaling
• Technology acceleration – Transforming business processes– Transforming products– Transforming the industry– Moore’s Law
Furthermore…Furthermore…
• Geographic Scaling– Internet used for sales– Network externalities
• Organizational Scaling– Flat organizations– Little vertical integration– Increasing product diversity– Integration across the value chain
• Geographic Scaling– Internet used for sales– Network externalities
• Organizational Scaling– Flat organizations– Little vertical integration– Increasing product diversity– Integration across the value chain
Financial Accounting for Knowledge Assets
Financial Accounting for Knowledge Assets
• Accounting rules prevent capture of value– Use of historic costs– Arbitrary cost allocation rules– The conservatism principle leads to
undervaluation of assets– Development of product costs
• Purpose of accounting to create financial statements
• Accounting rules prevent capture of value– Use of historic costs– Arbitrary cost allocation rules– The conservatism principle leads to
undervaluation of assets– Development of product costs
• Purpose of accounting to create financial statements
Knowledge Capital—Baruch Lev
Knowledge Capital—Baruch Lev
• Expected earnings minus expected income from tangible assets = knowledge based earnings
• Assets poor predictor of earnings
• Other factors that account for earnings variation?
• Expected earnings minus expected income from tangible assets = knowledge based earnings
• Assets poor predictor of earnings
• Other factors that account for earnings variation?
Value maximization
• Managers objective to maximize firm value
• Value of the firm equals discounted value of all future cash flows
Discounted Cash Flow (DCF)
where,NPV = Net Present ValueC = Investment at the start of the projectAt = Cash flow at tT = Project lifer = Risk-based discount rate for the project
Firm Value Maximization
where,PV = Present Market ValueAt = Cash flow at tT = Firm lifer = Industry required rate of return
Contribution of NPV
• Objective
• Congruence with value maximization
• Better than undiscounted cash flow, simple payback, ROI
Limitations
• Estimates of revenues and costs– manipulated to justify projects already selected
• Biased toward prior opinions• Applied in the face of flawed incentive systems• Assume accurate estimates of future cash flows• Estimations of project risk• Second stage projects• Terminal value
More issues with DCFMore issues with DCF
• Cash flows not reported in financial statements
• Use of linear extrapolations • Provides point estimates; no variance• Betas needed to calculate the discount rate,
but not available• Short operating history for knowledge based
firms
• Cash flows not reported in financial statements
• Use of linear extrapolations • Provides point estimates; no variance• Betas needed to calculate the discount rate,
but not available• Short operating history for knowledge based
firms
The Comparable Valuation Approach
The Comparable Valuation Approach
• Valuing a firm based on the value of similar firms, in terms of risk, growth rate, capital structure and the size and timing of cash flows
• Valuing a firm based on the value of similar firms, in terms of risk, growth rate, capital structure and the size and timing of cash flows
Appropriate Appropriate
• When business model for the firm is well specified
• Highly comparable group of firms exists
• When business model for the firm is well specified
• Highly comparable group of firms exists
WeaknessesWeaknesses
• Need to choose comparable firms
• Need to ascertain value of other firms
• Not valid if the entire sector is over or undervalued
• Need to choose comparable firms
• Need to ascertain value of other firms
• Not valid if the entire sector is over or undervalued
The approachThe approach
• Determine that some parameter among the comparable firms drives value, e.g., the price earnings ratio.
• The firm can be valued at the average P/E for the group of the comparable firms
• Common measures include P/E, market to book ratio, price/revenue ratio
• Determine that some parameter among the comparable firms drives value, e.g., the price earnings ratio.
• The firm can be valued at the average P/E for the group of the comparable firms
• Common measures include P/E, market to book ratio, price/revenue ratio
The Venture Capitalist Approach
The Venture Capitalist Approach
• Assume that all of the value of the asset comes from the terminal value
• Justification: VCs typically expect a series of losses leading to an IPO, where they’ll cash out
• Assume that all of the value of the asset comes from the terminal value
• Justification: VCs typically expect a series of losses leading to an IPO, where they’ll cash out
The VC approachThe VC approach
75%-40 typicallyreturn, of rate target theis
IPO theuntil years ofnumber theis
multiple ingsprice/earn expected theis
earnings IPO theis
where
)1(
*
r
t
m
r
mvalue
t
The VC approachThe VC approach
• Prices out high risks for new firms
• Compensates for illiquidity
• Compensates for exaggerated expectations by entrepreneurs
• Prices out high risks for new firms
• Compensates for illiquidity
• Compensates for exaggerated expectations by entrepreneurs
Valuation in PartsValuation in Parts
• Calculate value of various parts of the firm separately, e.g., financing and operations, and add them together
• Calculate value of various parts of the firm separately, e.g., financing and operations, and add them together
Options PricingOptions Pricing
• Value of an IT investment is, in part, based on option to make further investments later
• Right, but not obligation, to make the later investments is similar to an American call option. An American call option confers the right, but not obligation, to purchase a security at a given strike price within a specified time period
• Value of an IT investment is, in part, based on option to make further investments later
• Right, but not obligation, to make the later investments is similar to an American call option. An American call option confers the right, but not obligation, to purchase a security at a given strike price within a specified time period
Raison D'etreRaison D'etre
• Expected value of a future investment can have a negative value
• DCF method uses discounted expected value• Option to make such an investment can never
have a negative value• Useful when the investment decision can be
deferred
• Expected value of a future investment can have a negative value
• DCF method uses discounted expected value• Option to make such an investment can never
have a negative value• Useful when the investment decision can be
deferred
Value of Managerial Flexibility
• DCF method assumes 2nd stage projects are undertaken
• Actually won’t be undertaken if value less than 0 at time of investment decision
Value of Managerial Flexibility Example
Value of Managerial Flexibility Example
• The value of a $1.00 investment today will generate either $0.80, $1.10, or $2.00 with equal probability after one year.
• The expected value is ($0.80 + $1.10 + $2.00)/3 - $1.00 = $0.30
• But if the manager can wait until next year to determine whether the cash flow could be $0.80, then next year the expected value will be either $0.30 or $0.55 ($1.10 + $2.00)/2 - $1.00 = $0.55
• The value of the real option to delay the decision is $0.25
• The value of a $1.00 investment today will generate either $0.80, $1.10, or $2.00 with equal probability after one year.
• The expected value is ($0.80 + $1.10 + $2.00)/3 - $1.00 = $0.30
• But if the manager can wait until next year to determine whether the cash flow could be $0.80, then next year the expected value will be either $0.30 or $0.55 ($1.10 + $2.00)/2 - $1.00 = $0.55
• The value of the real option to delay the decision is $0.25
The Value of an Option
• In making an initial investment in IT the manager is purchasing an option to make a subsequent investment later if the value of the second stage project is positive
• Of course real problems don’t present themselves with such simple configurations
Exchange one risky asset for another risky asset
Exchange one risky asset for another risky asset
functiondist prob std ecummulativ =N
costst developmen expected luecurrent va
benefits expected luecurrent va
where
)()(
1
1
2111
C
B
dNCdNBVopt
Dos Santos B.L., "Justifying Investments in New Information Technologies," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 7, No. 4, Spring 1991, 71-89.
Options method cont.Options method cont.
exercised bemust option thebefore timeoflength
project stage 2ndfor revenue & costs dev ofn correlatio
revenuein changes of rate of variance
costst developmenin changes of rate of variance
2
2/)/ln(
12
12
12
12
12
122
12
2
111
t
tdd
ttCBd
BC
C
B
BCCBCB
Estimating the modelEstimating the model
• Necessary to estimate B1, C1, var B1, var C1, corr BC
• Estimating variation. Intuitively: “there is approximately a 2/3 probability that the revenues (costs) will vary up or down by no more than X%)”
• Estimating the corr BC. Intuitively: “approximately X% of the variation in revenues is attributable to variations in the development costs. The remainder is attributable to other factors. The corr BC is the squareroot of X.”
• Necessary to estimate B1, C1, var B1, var C1, corr BC
• Estimating variation. Intuitively: “there is approximately a 2/3 probability that the revenues (costs) will vary up or down by no more than X%)”
• Estimating the corr BC. Intuitively: “approximately X% of the variation in revenues is attributable to variations in the development costs. The remainder is attributable to other factors. The corr BC is the squareroot of X.”
AdvantagesAdvantages
• Provides a value for the option, even though the option cannot be traded
• Provides a value for the option, even though the option cannot be traded
LimitationsLimitations
• Credibility of the option value in the organizational decision making process
• Some managers might think that the value of the option cannot be well quantified
• Credibility of the option value in the organizational decision making process
• Some managers might think that the value of the option cannot be well quantified
Residual IncomeResidual Income
• Similar concepts: abnormal earnings, economic earnings
• Earnings beyond the required rate of equity investment returns for the industry
• Used by General Motors in the 1920s to evaluate investments
• Concept: a firm creates value only if return on capital is greater than cost of capital
• Similar concepts: abnormal earnings, economic earnings
• Earnings beyond the required rate of equity investment returns for the industry
• Used by General Motors in the 1920s to evaluate investments
• Concept: a firm creates value only if return on capital is greater than cost of capital
Residual IncomeResidual Income
book value period of beginning the
periodin capitalequity ofcost the
periodfor incomenet accounting al tradition the
periodfor income residual the
where
][
1
1
t
t
t
t
tttt
tCE
tI
t
CEI
Residual Income Present Value
Residual Income Present Value
book value period of beginning the
periodin capitalequity ofcost the
periodfor incomenet accounting al tradition the
periodfor income residual the
income residual of value the
][
where
)1(
1
1
01
t
t
t
t
RI
tttt
t t
tRI
tCE
tI
t
V
CEI
CEV
AdvantagesAdvantages
• Similarity to DCF
• Uses accounting earnings—easily obtained for ongoing business, not too easy for speculative investments
• Similarity to DCF
• Uses accounting earnings—easily obtained for ongoing business, not too easy for speculative investments
Predictive Value of Measures
Predictive Value of Measures
• As a predictor of stock value– GAAP earning: 12.8%– Residual income: 7.3%– Cash flow: 2.8%
• As a predictor of stock value– GAAP earning: 12.8%– Residual income: 7.3%– Cash flow: 2.8%
Economic Value AddedEconomic Value Added
• Variation on residual income promoted by consultant Stern Steward
• Adjustments (about 150) to correct perceived deficiencies caused by use of accounting income
• Variation on residual income promoted by consultant Stern Steward
• Adjustments (about 150) to correct perceived deficiencies caused by use of accounting income
Might We Infer…Might We Infer…
…that we have a long way to go before we have adequate methods to evaluate IT investments?
…that we have a long way to go before we have adequate methods to evaluate IT investments?