Using Google Earth & Wikimapia to Analyze
Hazard Risks in GeographyCharlene Sharpe
Rutgers GeographyMay 15, 2014
Integrate Workshop - FAU
Why this activity?
The Activity
The goal of this exercise is two- fold:-
a. To assess how the concepts of risk, resilience, hazard and vulnerability are applied to a real life event
b. To ascertain the usefulness of employing specific web based (open source) technologies to assess damages and predict risk in urban areas .
Summary
Students will use the tools available in Google Earth and Wikimapia to assess hazards risks/disasters and resilience in urban settings.
Using ONE case study city, chosen from New Orleans USA, (Katrina 2005) OR Port-au-Prince, Haiti (earthquake 2010),students will work in pairs to complete this five (5) steps exercise analyzing the evidence of hazards that is obtainable from aerial photographs contained in the popular Web-based sources Google Earth and Wikimapia, and assess its utility in predicting risk and assessing resilience and damage in comparison to other sources of non-visible or non-material information that are available to researchers. Students will also develop a "photo-scaling tool" to visually analyze their results
Time Slider
• Google Earth has a time slider that allows for the acquisition of past imagery over a 10-year period
Helpful in assessing exposure – see growth of shanty towns, changes in land use, so on
Wikimapia – uploaded photos
Planimeter – measure roof damage, area impacted, so on
Concerns
• the quality, cost and availability of images
historical imagery are not usually readily available to assist with analysis or to be used as baseline data.
Low resolution and heavy cloud cover comprise usability of satellite imageries
Impediments to data-sharingo Lack of interoperability of some
software
o Concerns about data security and accuracy
o Lack of user trainingo Google earth is but one component
– depend on other components which might be absent thus limiting it’s usefulness
VISUAL INDICATORS Track resource movementAvailability of food, hospitals, etcWhere help is neededWhere street signs are missing etc
Provocative questions
• Study spatial development of these risks and for the differential vulnerability of structures within shantytowns and urban areas• For example, would it have been better to have concentrated housing
improvement programs on the people who build the more substantial – but still fragile homes on hill slopes than on the abjectly flimsy homes located on flat areas?
• In not sharing data readily and in an open source mode what are the implications for secrecy and transparency and for social justice dimensions of hazards, disasters, resilience?
https://www.google.com/search?q=thank+you+images+funny