The State of UI: Condition, Compliance and
Cost Savings under new UI Integrity Rules
Silicon Valley APAThursday October 17th 2013
www.domain.comPhone: +1(123) 456 78 90 | e-mail: [email protected] LOGO
meet your presenter
Ross E. [email protected]
COO, Employment Technology Solutions (“ETS”)President, Association of Unemployment Tax Organizations (“AUTO”)
Payroll Advisory Board Member, HR.com
Join ETSwww.employmenttax.com
Phone: +1(800) 518-3874 | email: [email protected]
www.domain.comPhone: +1(123) 456 78 90 | e-mail: [email protected] LOGO
ETS SOLUTIONSTechnology-based Solutions Driving Compliance, Convenience & Savings for Employers
Tax Consulting
• M&A Consulting & Credits
• Tax Advisory
• Hiring Credits & Incentives
• Statutory Account Review
• Protective Filings
Verification
• Electronic I-9 and E-Verify Integration
• Verification of Income and Employment (VOIE)
• OIG Exclusion Processing
Unemployment Claims
• UI Claims Administration
• Hearing Attendance
• Bonded Service
• Training Tools
• Benefit Charge Audits
HR Tools
• On-boarding Services
• Online Job Portal
• Applicant Tracking Systems
• Background Checks
• Assessment Tools
www.employmenttax.comPhone: +1(800) 518-3874 | email: [email protected] ETS
NEW!
www.domain.comPhone: +1(123) 456 78 90 | e-mail: [email protected] LOGO
Presentation Agenda
www.employmenttax.comPhone: +1(800) 518-3874 | email: [email protected] ETS
• Condition of UI Nationally• Legislative Path to UI Integrity• Understanding Section 252• Best Practices for UI Integrity: “A-C-T”
GOALS: Compliance, Efficiency & Cost Savings!
Plus: Raffle Gift!!! - $75 Sports Chalet Gift Card
www.domain.comPhone: +1(123) 456 78 90 | e-mail: [email protected] LOGO
UI Conditions
www.employmenttax.comPhone: +1(800) 518-3874 | email: [email protected] ETS
www.domain.comPhone: +1(123) 456 78 90 | e-mail: [email protected] LOGO
Condition of UI: National Focus
www.employmenttax.comPhone: +1(800) 518-3874 | email: [email protected] ETS
Many States’ UI Reserves Still Insolvent
Red = borrowing as of 8/30/13. Yellow = less than 6 mos. of positive balances. Green = more than 6 mos. of benefits. Orange= ER-financed bond
State Trust Fund Solvency as of August 2013. Map taken from August 2013 SUCAP Report, based on US DOL UI data quarterly summary charts & SUCAP Reports.
www.domain.comPhone: +1(123) 456 78 90 | e-mail: [email protected] LOGO
Condition of the UI System
www.employmenttax.comPhone: +1(800) 518-3874 | email: [email protected] ETS
•Taxable wage bases &/or UI tax rates continue to increase.•National unemployment rate: 7.3% (August 2013, BLS)•National average cost per UI claim: roughly $7,703 (DOL).•Assessments to UI rates • Bond expense, etc. • States using employer-financed bonds: CO, ID, IL, MI, PA, TX
•New legislation & enforcement for UI integrity.•FUTA Credit Reduction for 19 states (2012 tax year). See states.
www.domain.comPhone: +1(123) 456 78 90 | e-mail: [email protected] LOGO
UI System Outdated & Flawed
www.employmenttax.comPhone: +1(800) 518-3874 | email: [email protected] ETS
•Agency error and overcharging Employer (“ER”) accounts estimated at ~10-15%.
•Federal Sequester raises risk of improper accounting of benefit payments.
•History of ER and Employee (“EE”) abuse of the system (SUTA Dumping, excess collection).
•ER & Third Party Administrator (“TPA”) problems with untimely or inadequate responses for claim info.
•Inefficient communication & data exchange.
Image credit: cassettes
www.domain.comPhone: +1(123) 456 78 90 | e-mail: [email protected] LOGO
UI System Outdated & Flawed
www.employmenttax.comPhone: +1(800) 518-3874 | email: [email protected] ETS
•Agency error and overcharging Employer (“ER”) accounts estimated at ~10-15%.
- Fed Sequester accounting challenges. - UI Agency IT system challenges (CA, MA etc.)
• History of ER and Employee (“EE”) abuse of the system (SUTA Dumping, excess collection). • ER & Third Party Administrator (“TPA”) problems with untimely or inadequate responses for claim info.• Inefficient communication & data exchange.
8 Track Image Credit: Phillip Pessar
www.domain.comPhone: +1(123) 456 78 90 | e-mail: [email protected] LOGO
Immediate Impetus: Financial Conditions & Systemic Abuse
www.employmenttax.comPhone: +1(800) 518-3874 | email: [email protected] ETS
• In 2011, the DOL estimated $14B, or 11% of all UI claim payouts, result from overpayments. UI named a “high-error” program. • DOL estimates 19% of UI benefit overpayments stem from employers' untimely response and/or inaccurate information.• States like IN, LA, AZ, CO, VA pegged with 19-43% improper payment rates.• Economic conditions since ‘08 have spiked jobless claims, drained states’ UI reserves, triggered Fed loans to states to cover UI costs.• Growing U.S. deficit/political pressure to reign in budget.
www.domain.comPhone: +1(123) 456 78 90 | e-mail: [email protected] LOGO
Snapshot of California
www.employmenttax.comPhone: +1(800) 518-3874 | email: [email protected] ETS
• Unemployment Rate (Sept ‘13): 8.9%
• Trust Fund Loan (Sept ‘13); $9B
• ‘13 Taxable Wage Base: $7000
• ‘13 Tax Rates 1.5% min – 6.2% max
• ‘13 Projected FUTA Credit Reduction 1.20%
• ‘13 Min/Max Weekly Benefit $40 - $450
www.domain.comPhone: +1(123) 456 78 90 | e-mail: [email protected] LOGO
Spotlight On: UI Overpayment
2012 estimated UI improper
payments in CA
$403M
Agency role in overpayment error, July 2009 – June 2012
26.62%
Employer role in overpayment error, July 2009 – June 2012
19.87%
www.employmenttax.comPhone: +1(800) 518-3874 | email: [email protected] ETS
Data retrieved from DOL’s UI Improper Payment by State
“Role in error” = part or whole responsibility, calculated as % of total UI claims dollars overpaid in CA
California as an Example
www.domain.comPhone: +1(123) 456 78 90 | e-mail: [email protected] LOGO
Key Legislation:UI Integrity
www.employmenttax.comPhone: +1(800) 518-3874 | email: [email protected] ETS
www.domain.comPhone: +1(123) 456 78 90 | e-mail: [email protected] LOGO
Key Federal UI Legislation
www.employmenttax.comPhone: +1(800) 518-3874 | email: [email protected] ETS
• 2004 SUTA Dumping Act• 2011 TAAE UI Integrity (Sec. 252)• 2012 ATRAoEE SS tax returnoWOTC reauthorized
www.domain.comPhone: +1(123) 456 78 90 | e-mail: [email protected] LOGO
2004 State Unemployment Tax “SUTA” Dumping Prevention Act
www.employmenttax.comPhone: +1(800) 518-3874 | email: [email protected] ETS
•SUTA Dumping (a.k.a. “unemployment tax avoidance”) occurs by shifting EEs to a less-taxed entity to avoid paying a higher UI tax rate.
•Migration of EEs between legal entities (M&A, consolidation, etc.) may trigger time-sensitive mandatory compliance reporting – often missed!
• Penalties for missing or incorrect reporting can include max UI ratings; civil &/or criminal penalties.
• Read Employer’s M&A “To Do” List.
www.domain.comPhone: +1(123) 456 78 90 | e-mail: [email protected] LOGO
2012 ATRA (American Taxpayer Relief Act )
www.employmenttax.comPhone: +1(800) 518-3874 | email: [email protected] ETS
•EE SS tax rates return to 6.2% in 2013 from 4.2% in 2012 (i.e., 2% FICA payroll tax cut "payroll holiday" not extended).
•SS taxable wage limit up to $113,700 in 2013 (from $110,100 in 2012).
•Extension of Emergency Unemployment Compensation ("EUC").
•Temp. extension of 100% federal reimbursement for states triggering on regular extended benefits ("EB").
•Extension of over 30 business credits, including: R&D, WOTC, EZ
www.domain.comPhone: +1(123) 456 78 90 | e-mail: [email protected] LOGO
2011 Federal “TAAEA” Law: Sec. 252/UI Integrity
www.employmenttax.comPhone: +1(800) 518-3874 | email: [email protected] ETS
•Follow-on to 2009 Executive Order 13520 to reduce improper UI payments.
•Under TAAEA’s Sec. 252, states must not relieve ERs of charges when they fail to respond timely or adequately to agency request for info.
•States to develop their own definitions for “pattern of failure” (some states also defining “non-timely response”).
•All states to enact UI Integrity legislation by 10/22/13.
www.domain.comPhone: +1(123) 456 78 90 | e-mail: [email protected] LOGO
UI Integrity: Sec. 252 Points
www.employmenttax.comPhone: +1(800) 518-3874 | email: [email protected] ETS
•Also provides ERs cannot collude with EE to misuse UC system.
•ERs and TPAs with established pattern of non-timely response penalized more, but pattern can be as little as two instances!
•ERs may be held responsible for inaction and timeliness (or lack thereof) on the part of their TPAs.
•Fault means in part or in whole.
www.domain.comPhone: +1(123) 456 78 90 | e-mail: [email protected] LOGO
State Legislation Snapshot
www.employmenttax.comPhone: +1(800) 518-3874 | email: [email protected] ETS
Some State Legislation Goes Beyond the Federal Requirement:• HI and CT legislation prohibits relief from charges after just one occurrence of late or inadequate response.
• ID’s legislation prohibits relief after two occurrences.
• VA law widens scope of timeframe; pattern = 4 occurrences in 4 years.
Download ETS:“Section 252 Employer Fact Sheet” here.“UI Integrity Law Compliance Tips” here.
www.domain.comPhone: +1(123) 456 78 90 | e-mail: [email protected] LOGO
“Pattern of Failure" Defined (Examples)
www.employmenttax.comPhone: +1(800) 518-3874 | email: [email protected] ETS
State Enacted Date Effective Date Pattern of Failure =
WA 5/8/13 10/20/13 Greater of 3 or more offenses in 2 years or 2% of total current claims.
WV 4/2/12 7/1/12 Not defined
WY 3/13/13 7/1/13 Greater of 2 or more offenses or 2% during the four most recent completed calendar quarters prior to current request
MA Prior to TAAEA (in effect) First offense
NC 2/19/13 10/21/13 2% during the past year
SC 6/7/13 10/21/13 3 or more offenses OR 3% of agency requests within a year, whichever is greater.
www.domain.comPhone: +1(123) 456 78 90 | e-mail: [email protected] LOGO
Financial Impact Example
www.employmenttax.comPhone: +1(800) 518-3874 | email: [email protected] ETS
Case Study: • ER With 100 Separations/Yr; Classified with “Pattern of Failure.” • Benefit$ paid to claimant prior to successful Appeal by ER.
FACTORS FIGURES
Weekly benefit amount Assume $300
Time to appeal 8 weeks
# of claims lost on initial determination & won by ER on Appeal
10 (out of 100 total separations)
Charge to ER UI account $24,000 ($2,400 x 10 claims) now NON-RECOVERABLE due to “Pattern of Failure.”
Additional Exposure / Negative Impact •May raise AUDIT RISK for other UI areas, other state taxes, other jurisdictions•May elevate ER experience rating
www.domain.comPhone: +1(123) 456 78 90 | e-mail: [email protected] LOGO
Audit Alert: Inter-Agency Info Sharing
www.employmenttax.comPhone: +1(800) 518-3874 | email: [email protected] ETS
•Fed & state sharing info, data mining, creating cross-agency task forces.
•Questionable Employment Tax Practices “QETP” Initiative
- 37 states & IRS
•Facilitated by movement to electronic databases.
www.domain.comPhone: +1(123) 456 78 90 | e-mail: [email protected] LOGO
QETP Results Through Mid-2012
www.employmenttax.comPhone: +1(800) 518-3874 | email: [email protected] ETS
• Nearly 12,000 businesses examined.
• States reclassified $1.8B+ in wages and assessed $27M+ via federal data.
• IRS assessed almost $23M in taxes from state referrals.
• Over 107,000 workers reclassified.
• Significant incentives to agencies to aggressively evaluate and audit employers.
www.domain.comPhone: +1(123) 456 78 90 | e-mail: [email protected] LOGO
Solutions & Best Practices for
UI Compliance, Efficiency & Cost Savings
www.employmenttax.comPhone: +1(800) 518-3874 | email: [email protected] ETS
www.domain.comPhone: +1(123) 456 78 90 | e-mail: [email protected] LOGO
www.employmenttax.comPhone: +1(800) 518-3874 | email: [email protected] ETS
•DOL & state agencies collaborate on secure, electronic, standardized-format platform for UI data transfer. •SIDES E-Response: web-based for smaller ERs (limited claims). •SIDES: direct data exchange for TPAs and larger ERs, requires internal IT & $$$ for setup.•Aims to improve timeliness and completeness, reduce overpayments & erroneous charges, lower UI tax rates.• 46 states in some stage of SIDES implementation (….not CA)
www.domain.comPhone: +1(123) 456 78 90 | e-mail: [email protected] LOGO
UI Integrity Oversight Plan
Designate a Person or
Team
Total UI Claims (also by
state/location)Which claims failed to be
timely/ adequate? Why?
Who?
Track win/loss
for protests.
For losses, why? Who?
Track win/loss for appeals. Why? Who?
Impact on experience
rating? Calculate cost
to organization.
Find & fix areas of
organizational weakness.
www.employmenttax.comPhone: +1(800) 518-3874 | email: [email protected] ETS
www.domain.comPhone: +1(123) 456 78 90 | e-mail: [email protected] LOGO
www.employmenttax.comPhone: +1(800) 518-3874 | email: [email protected] ETS
“ACT.”Provide information to UI agencies
that is:AccurateComplete
Timely
Best Practices
www.domain.comPhone: +1(123) 456 78 90 | e-mail: [email protected] LOGO
Controllable Risk FactorsContributing to UI Cost & Noncompliance
www.employmenttax.comPhone: +1(800) 518-3874 | email: [email protected] ETS
Challenge #1: Organizational Structure:•Limited infrastructure committed to UI process•Minimal or non-existent “intra-departmental” technology for seamless, timely receipt &“effective” follow-through for every claim •Inconsistent expertise responsible for program success (turnover) = inconsistent program delivery•Lack of corporate recognition/support
www.domain.comPhone: +1(123) 456 78 90 | e-mail: [email protected] LOGO
Controllable Risk Factors Contributing to UI Cost & Noncompliance
www.employmenttax.comPhone: +1(800) 518-3874 | email: [email protected] ETS
Challenge #2: Training for Results• Educate invested parties (C-level, HR, Payroll, Managers….) to recognize: • Relationship between claim process & cost impact to organization• Secure/train competent charge analyst:
o Match benefit year wages vs. chargeso Scrutinize reports for charge irregularityo Audit charge statement to ensure accuracyo Create effective contact process with agencyo Follow-through on reversing inaccurate charges
www.domain.comPhone: +1(123) 456 78 90 | e-mail: [email protected] LOGO
Controllable Risk Factors Contributing to UI Cost & Noncompliance
www.employmenttax.comPhone: +1(800) 518-3874 | email: [email protected] ETS
Challenge #3: Initial Claim Protest- Strong From the Start
• Cost-effective elements in initial claim protest process:o Detailed system of records to collect/transmit required
data o Mechanism to ensure timely response/all initial claimso “Follow-through” procedures to ensure agency
complianceo Built-in “triggers” to determine needed process
improvement
www.domain.comPhone: +1(123) 456 78 90 | e-mail: [email protected] LOGO
Critical Report Audits & Tracking
www.employmenttax.comPhone: +1(800) 518-3874 | email: [email protected] ETS
•Track results/determine program compliance & process improvement initiatives•Manage/scrutinize high cost contributors •Identify strong program performers•Charge impact driver by separation mix and charge amounts
• Electronic benefit charge audit system (cross-check all charges)•Ensure charge accuracy against agency tables/formulas•Tools for aggregate review & analysis of “real time” reports
www.domain.comPhone: +1(123) 456 78 90 | e-mail: [email protected] LOGO
UCM Plus Screenshot
www.employmenttax.comPhone: +1(800) 518-3874 | email: [email protected] ETS
Here’s where an electronic solution can really help minimize your costs by delivering
advanced reporting features and supporting Accurate, Complete & Timely responses to
agency.
This image has been redacted to protect the integrity of ETS’ UCM Plus UI Claims Management Solution. Should you wish to view a
demo of the software, please contact ETS at [email protected].
www.domain.comPhone: +1(123) 456 78 90 | e-mail: [email protected] LOGO
UI Integrity Prep Checklist
www.employmenttax.comPhone: +1(800) 518-3874 | email: [email protected] ETS
Done? UI Prep Item
Understanding of Issues (i.e. Costs & Audit Exposure)
Internal Assessment of Readiness / Exposure
Develop a Plan / Organizational Strategy
Identify Responsible Parties (Individual or Teams)
Establish Training for Key Staff (and/or strategy for TPA Partner)
Regular Reporting and Measure Success / Areas for Improvement (Access to Real-time Reporting Tools)
“Rinse & Repeat”
www.domain.comPhone: +1(123) 456 78 90 | e-mail: [email protected] LOGO
Retro UI Review
www.employmenttax.comPhone: +1(800) 518-3874 | email: [email protected] ETS
General Evaluation• Contact ALL UI jurisdictions• Perform account balancing (per state records) – Qtr. by Qtr. rearward review.• Determine what credits found eligible for refund & if debits, found if correct.• Research for any missing / incomplete or untimely reporting on the account.• Review all M&A past 3 years.• Help reduce source of potential penalty or increased UI tax expense.
Photo credit: motone
www.domain.comPhone: +1(123) 456 78 90 | e-mail: [email protected] LOGO
ETS Resources•UI Integrity State Legislation Tracker•How Nonprofit Employers Can Reduce UI Cost•Tips on Choosing a UCM Vendor
Go here to download three pages of UI Tips
from ETS.
ETS’ UI
Tips
Download this one page checklist to assess the state of your UI Claims Administration
Is Your UCM Broken?
Go here to learn more, and here to contact ETS.
Learn more about ETS’ UCM Plus Solution
www.employmenttax.comPhone: +1(800) 518-3874 | email: [email protected] ETS
ETS Blog
Go here to get ETS’ best UCM blog posts and
resources in one place.
www.domain.comPhone: +1(123) 456 78 90 | e-mail: [email protected] LOGO
Torrance, CA and Guilford CT(800) 518-3874
Connect with us on LinkedIn
CONTACT ETS
www.employmenttax.comPhone: +1(800) 518-3874 | email: [email protected] ETS
thank you!
Q&A
Questions & Requests for Presentation Slides::
Ross Henderson-COO [email protected]