ABACOAgro-ecology based aggradation-conservation agriculture
Targeting innovations to combat soil degradation and food insecurity in semi-arid Africa
Pablo Tittonell, Eric Scopel, Gerardo Halsema, Nadine Andrieu, Helena Posthumus, Paul Mapfumo, Rabah Lahmar, Marc Corbeels, Tom Apina, Jacqueline Rakotoarisoa, Florence
Mtambanengwe, Barry Pound, Regis Chikowo, Saidi Mkomwa
Problem statement Poor soil fertility and soil degradation limit food security
CA may be low-cost investment strategy to increase water productivity and
resilience to climate variability, and reverse soil degradation
But adoption by smallholders in sub-Saharan Africa seems to be hampered by:
Concerns on initial yield decreases
Lack of sufficient biomass for effective mulching
Increased labour requirements if no access to herbicides
Lack of access to and use of external inputs
CA has to be tailored to local agro-ecological and socio-economic conditions
Adoption of innovations is a non-linear process
Sharing knowledge and building capacity through innovation platforms may
enhance adaptation and adoption of CA by smallholders
ABACO projectObjective: reduce vulnerability of smallholder farmers to climatic variability by building capacity through innovation platforms to design, evaluate and implement targeted technological options for, and mechanisms to promote adoption of, conservation agriculture based on agro-ecological principles to combat land degradation and food insecurity in semi-arid sub-Saharan Africa.
Specific objectives:1. To target CA to smallholders’ conditions2. To involve farmers and researchers in co-
innovation platforms to facilitate adaptation/appropriation
3. To assess the social and economic viability and tradeoffs across scales and scenarios
4. To promote dissemination of CA alternatives and approaches
5. To reinforce existing knowledge networks on CA
ABACO projectProject leader: Saidi Mkomwa – ACT
Consortium: ACT, CIRAD, CIRDES, EMBRAPA, FOFIFA, SOFECSA, University of Greenwich (NRI), Wageningen University, Yellow Window
Timeframe: 2011 – 2014
Funded by EU
Semi-arid areas of East (Kenya, Tanzania), West (Burkina Faso, Mali) and Southern (Zimbabwe, Mozambique, Madagascar) Africa
Building on previous projects: KASSA, CA2Africa
Project sites
ACT
CIRDES
SOFECSA FOFIFA
A focus on dryland areas
(400 – 1200 mm)
Rabah Lahmar (2009)
Stepwise ‘aggradation’
Aggradation: slow process of soil formation (borrowed term from geography used for alluvial soils)
How fast does this happen?What is the importance to farmers’ livelihoods?What indicators can be used for monitoring?
Stepwise ‘aggradation’ABACO’s approach of aggradation/conservation agriculture consists of:
• Implementing measures traditionally promoted as soil and water conservation, water harvesting technologies or (indigenous) agroforestry, during an initial phase of soil restoration or ‘greening’.
• Only when a minimum efficiency of nutrient and water capture has been achieved to allow increasing primary productivity, the three principles of CA may become effective: zero tillage, permanent soil cover and crop rotation.
• Particularly in dry environments the response of soil productivity to soil restorative measures may exhibit a faceted pattern characterised by an initial response to increased water availability (i.e., the ‘greening’ effect) with a slight loss in water productivity, followed by a response to increased soil fertility once nutrients become available (resulting in greater water productivity).
ti
Plant biomass (kg ha-1)
Transpiration (mm)
Increased water availability
Incr
ease
d nu
trie
nt
avai
lab
ility
ti+1
ti+2
wi wi+1
bi
bi+1
bi+2
Stepwise ‘aggradation’Water productivity
Soil rehabilitation
The response of a degraded agro-ecosystem to rehabilitation measures may be fast or slow, and exhibit weak or strong hysteresis (i.e., h, h’ or h”). The periods t25%, t50% and t100% represent the delay necessary to achieve 25 to 100% of the original performance, efficiency or stock level. The rate of responsiveness depends on:• the indicator chosen to characterize the response (productivity, efficiencies, stocks), • on the type of measure(s) implemented to restore productivity, • on the biophysical properties of the agro-ecosystem, and • on the behaviour of external factors (e.g. rainfall).
Feasibility and tradeoffsharvest
Crop
leaching
fertilizer
cropuptake
gaseous losses
erosion
harvest
Pruningsmulch
competitive tree uptake
‘safety-net’ tree uptake
Tree
Crop
N2fixation
leaching
fertilizer
cropuptake
gaseous losses
erosion
NPKNPK
NPK
NPKNPK
NPK
NPKNPKNPKNPK
NPKNPK
Experimental field
On-farm
Landscape
Co-innovation platform
Research for development
Rural community
Promotion & extension Knowledge
networks
Field schools
Action research
Other stakeholders
Other stakeholders
Other stakeholders
Innovation platforms
Based on Learning Centres model, Zimbabwe
The 5 ABACO principles
1. Rehabilitation of degraded soils to restore biomass productivity, in order to secure the various functions of CA that depend on above and belowground plant biomass;
2. Increased water productivity and soil water buffering capacity to face increasing risks associated with climate change, creating more conducive conditions for farmers’ investments;
3. Intensifying agro-ecological functions to capitalise on natural interactions, increase resource use efficiency and reduce dependence on external inputs;
4. Embed these principles in sustainable innovation support systems that recognise the complexity and non-linearity of agricultural innovation processes;
5. Institutionalization of enabling policies and market conditions so as to facilitate uptake and promotion of CA among smallholder farmers.
ABACO activities
1. On-station and on-farm field experimentation
2. Gender-sensitive characterisation of conditions for implementing CA technologies and gender mainstreaming of all activities
3. Action research with rural communities
4. Participatory & model-based scenario analysis and tradeoffs evaluation
5. Training & capacity development
6. Dissemination
7. Policy analysis and recommendations
Existing CA knowledge
Site charac-terisation & diagnosis Field testing
& niche targeting
Supportive basic
research
Field demonstra-tion, farmer valuation & adaptation Feasibility
and tradeoffs evaluation
Dissemina-tion & out-
reach
Pro
jec
t p
rog
res
s
FP6 CA2Africa
Policy recommen-
dations
Analysis tool development
Field activities
Innovation platforms
FP7 KASSA
Best-bets
Material development
Policy analysis
The ABACO project
WP1. Diagnosis, design and testing
WP3. Feasibility and trade-offs evaluation
WP4. Dissemination, impact and networking
Soil rehabilitation and integrated fertility
management
Water productivity and climatic variability
I
II
Design and testing of water capture and climate coping alternatives based on CA
Evaluation of CA alternatives under climatic scenarios, risk and vulnerability
Documentation of 4W(*), adoption and adaptation strategies; Mechanisms of dissemination-learning
Documentation of 4W(*), adoption and adaptation strategies; Mechanisms of dissemination-learning
Themes
Work packages
WP2. Innovation support
Farmer testing & adaptation of soil rehabilitation & fertility management alternatives
Farmer testing & adaptation of water capture and climate coping alternatives
Livelihood, gender and policy evaluation
IV
Gender-sensitive socio-economic diagnosis of enabling environments & local perceptions
Evaluation of social & economic viability of CA; tradeoffs under policy and market scenarios
Analysis of adoption, adaptation and learning processes; Policy design & recommendations
Innovation systems support, organisational landscapes, capacity needs & development
(*) the 4W stand for “What Worked, Where and Why?”
Methods and tools Surveying & diagnosis, on-farm & on-station
experiments, measurements
Dynamic and bio-economic modeling at different scales,
participatory evaluation
Meta-analysis, stakeholder platforms, dissemination
events & material
Stakeholder analysis, farmer groups, action research &
training
Agroecological functions and environmental
servicesIII
Multi-criteria evaluation of CA functions & sustainability: tradeoffs from field to regional scale
Farmer testing & adaptation of biodiversity mediated functions, valuation of indicators
Assessment of externalities and service provision (e.g. carbon sequestration, biodiversity, water saving)
Design and testing of CA alternatives for soil rehabilitation and fertility management
Diagnosis & identification of biodiversity-mediated CA functions, definition of indicators
Evaluation of C and nutrient flows and tradeoffs for CA implementation from field to regional scale
Organisational matrix
Flows
WP3: Feasibility and trade-offs evaluation
WP4: Dissemination and impact assessment
WP1: Diagnosis, design and testing
WP1-W WP1-E WP1-S
Field testing & targeting
Supportive research
Dissemination & outreach
Network reinforcement
Scenario analysis
Model development
Diagnosis & characterisation
Innovation platforms
Participatory evaluation
Policy analysis &design
WP0: Coordination
Training of trainers
WP2: Innovation support
WP1-M
Concluding remarks
• ABACO is a concept relying on 5 principles, borrowing from ISFM, agroecology and innovation systems
• We cannot ‘conserve’ what has already been degraded – a stepwise ‘aggradation’ phase is needed
• The EU-funded ABACO project targets innovations to combat food insecurity in semiarid areas
• Four transversal themes organise the research questions
• Four work packages delineate the project activities
• We are not starting from zero…
For questions:On water productivity: [email protected] On soil fertility: [email protected] On diagnosis & design: [email protected] On feasibility & tradeoffs: [email protected] On agro-ecological functions: [email protected] innovation platforms, adoption & gender: [email protected] ABACO: [email protected]
A B A C O
THANK YOU!