1
Alain GeenritsSystems Practice Sun [email protected]://blogs.sun.com/bitstream
From hot spots toCoolthreads
1
2
Sun's Eco Innovation
3
Innovation Across the Product Line
Servers
Sun Blade6000
Sun SPARC Enterprise T1000/2000
Sun Ray 2
Sun Fire X4500Sun Fire X4600
Sun StorageTek6540
Disk Array
Sun Fire x64
Sun SPARCEnterprise
Sun StorageTekSL8500
Tape Library
Project Blackbox
Clients Storage
Netra T2000
4
“Greening” Our Own Datacenters
• Scalable, Repeatable, Modular 'pod' architecture> Modular power busway> Adaptable cooling systems> Simplified cabling
• Energy-efficient technology• Metering and measurement• Cross-function design team• Quick, Easy wins
And Sharing Our Experiences
5
Sun Bay Area Campus Upgrade Reduces Space and Utility Costs
● 4,813 users served with two-thirds the equipment
● 91% reduction in floor space(44 to 4 racks)
● 88% drop in utility costs ($107.4K annual, equipment alone)
● 244% storage capacity increase with 70% less arrays
● Servers: 88 (v880) ● Space: 1,320 SF (44
racks x 30 SF/rack)738 arrays, 292TB
● Power: 122 kW load (88 x 1381/Wattsaverage sustained per server)
● Cost: $122Kannual utility costs (88 x $1390/year)
● Servers: 58(Sun SPARC Enterprise T2000)
● Space: 120 SF (4 racks x 30 SF/rack)225 arrays with 713TB
● Power: 11.6 kW load (58 x 200/Watts average sustained per server)
● Cost: $14.6Kannual utility costs (58 x $251/year)
Before After Results
6
Bay Area Datacenter Consolidation$1M/year in cost savings, in addition to power and space
• Increase compute power by over 450% > (from 2,177 to 1,240 servers)
• Increase storage capacity by over 240% > ( from 738 to 225 storage devices)
• Decommission more than 5,000 devices> Servers, Storage, Network
• Reduce carbon emissions by 3,227 metric tons
• Improve server utilization by up to 85%
> Cut energy costs by over 60% ($860,000 savings in 9 months) > Get nearly $1M in rebates & awards from Silicon Valley Power
7
European Datacenter ConsolidationAchieve 50% Utility Reduction and 80% Space Compression
• 80% reduction in server/storage space • 50% reduction in power and cooling
costs: $118K/year power savings• Replaced 22 older server models with 4
standard Sun high-efficiency models• Optimized power from 2kW to 9kW per
rack• Enhanced storage utilization and
management• Improved performance and availability
8
A group of racks or benches with a common hot or cold aisle used as a building block to simplify datacenter
design for power, cooling, & cabling
The POD Architecture
Vendor Independent, Slab or Raised Floor, Flexible, Scalable, High Density
9
A group of racks or benches with a common hot or cold aisle used as a building block to simplify datacenter
design for power, cooling, & cabling
The POD Architecture
Vendor Independent, Slab or Raised Floor, Flexible, Scalable, High Density
10
11
Systems
12
Upgrade for Maximum Efficiency Maximize Performance, Minimize Power and Space
64 Threads in 1997E10K
64 Threads in 2007Niagara 2
SizeFull Rack 1U
Power(Systems at peak utilization)9620 W Est. 410 W
Weight1,800 lbs. Est. 45 lbs.
Performance~150k tpm Est. ~325k tpm
24x
40x
40x
>2x
50x+ Lower Cost !
13
Energy Waste at Low Utilization:High %Utilization Saves More than Best Power Saving HW/SW
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160WattsWatt/perf
%Utilization
Wat
ts (
& w
att/p
erf)
@10%utilization 5x power waste per unit of work!
@30%utilization2x power waste!
Significant energyefficiency only above60% Utilization!
Good Datacenter Policy & Sun's Virtualization Drives Up Utilization
14
Energy Efficient by Design• Sun Blade energy efficient
chassis design> High efficiency cooling via straight
through airflow design> Shared power and cooling: 15% more
energy efficient than rack servers> Single stage DC to DC power
conversion
• SPARC CoolThreads technology> Energy efficient octal core,
32 thread design
• Sun Blade power tools> Real time system power reporting
15
Smart Packaging: More Gains
SPECjAppServer2004Multi-tier Java benchmark for B2B
transaction processing
Eco-Responsible Performance Breakthrough
Sun Blade 6000 configured with 10 Sun Blade T6300 Server Modules
• Beats IBM Blade solution by 89% using only ½ the energy
• Faster and 2.5x more power efficient than HP Itanium2 solution in ¼ the space
Sun Blade 6000 Delivers Highest Result Ever Using Less Than 1/2 the Energy In Less Than 1/4 the Space
3x+The
Performance/Watt
SPEC, SPECjAppServer are reg.TM of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. Results as of 08/20/2007. For the latest, visit http://www.spec.org * See Disclosure Slide
16
• Eco-Friendly designs should accommodate several generations of processors and memory upgrades
Modular Design Scales For The FutureSame chassis from single core to quad core
4-way
8-way
16-way
Future 32-way
AMD Opteron™ processors
Seamless Transition to Quad-core
Designed to maximize server density and minimize transitions
17
x64 Eco Innovations
• AMD-based System Innovations> Dual and Quad core> PowerNow!> AMD-V> Dual Dynamic Power Management> Hypertransport Links
18
x64 Eco Innovations
• Intel-based System Innovations> Intel® Core™ microarchitecture
– Intel® Intelligent Power Capability– Intel® Advanced Smart Cache– Intel® Smart Memory Access
> Enhanced Intel® Speedstep™ Technology
> Intel® Virtualization Technology
19
Higher levels of performance
SPEC, SPECjbb are reg.TM of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. Results as of 08/20/2007. For the latest, visit http://www.spec.org
20
Sun Fire X4500--Thumper
48 TeraByte Integrated System
Sun Fire X4500 Server + Switch + Storage Arrays=
Solaris ZFS
Incredibly High Throughput and Storage Density
21
• 10x savings on annual electricity bill
• 10x reduction in CO2 emissions per year
• Certified to accommodate over 1PB of source data> Six trillion SQL records > 1 billion emails,
documents & images
• Shrink storage footprint by a factor of 6x
Optimize Your Footprint with SunWorld's Largest Data Warehouse Reference Architecture
a. As of August, 2007, the electric rate of $0.11 per KWh is used based on the Energy Information Administration at http://eia.doe.gov.
b. Typical pollutant factor of 1.34 lb. of CO2 per KWh (http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/page/co2_report/co2report.html)
c. Based on the average weight of the storage and server equipment that would be needed.
22
VMware - Proven Scalability & Consolidation42 virtual servers will consolidate onto one Sun Fire X4600 Server
Lionbridge - http://www.lionbridge.com/competitive_analysis/reports/sun/sun_galaxy_4_performance_study.pdf, Proven Scalability Product Brief - www.sun.com/servers/x64/x4600/VMScaling-Final3.pdf, Proven Scalability White Paper - www.sun.com/servers/x64/x4600/VMScalability-wp.pdf
Reduce complexity and save Energy
21 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Servers • 7 File Servers running dbench• 7 Web Servers running Apache with
SPECweb2005• 7 OLTP Database Servers running
Oracle® 10g utilizing Swingbench
21 Microsoft Windows 2003 Servers• 7 Mail Servers running MS
Exchange 2003• 7 Java Order Entry Servers running
JRockit utilizing SPECjbb2005• 7 Standby Servers
23
CoolThreads
24
Once Upon A Time...
• GHz was king• One architecture for everything• Out of performance? Add a new server!
25
But Sun Thought Differently
• Pioneered multi-core in 2000• Introduced UltraSPARC T1 in 2005• 32 threads in 8 cores at <80W
26
And It Was The Right Time
• Web workloads still exploding• Power&cooling are major concerns• Consolidation is key driver
27
We Were Very Careful
• New technology• Single-threaded vs.
multi-threaded• Careful with floating-point• Lots of trainings/workshops• Tools for:
> Assessing workloads> Optimize deployments> Optimized web stack
opensparc.net/cool-tools.html
28
And Had A Lot Of Success!
$700M+ in revenue since Dec. 2005 introduction
“We are ecstatic with the cost, throughput performance, and power economics of the Sun Fire™ T2000 servers... We experienced a 50% decrease in server power consumption.”
“[The Sun Fire T2000 servers] utilize less space and consume much less energy while delivering significantly improved performance.”“Numbers don't lie: We experienced a 300% performance increase after we started using the T1000s – in a third of the space, and at a third of the power consumption...”
“We improve performance so much and reduce costs in so many ways with the T2000 that it represents a 10X improvement in price-performance for our entire architecture.”
“These servers could save companies millions.”
Winner--Best Midrange Server:Sun Fire T2000
29
Then, we Introduced UltraSPARC T2
• Double the throughput• Double the memory• Better single-threaded
performance• Built-in 2x 10 GbE• Free, efficient virtualization• Free, fast crypto
30
C4C3C2C1
L2$ BankL2$ BankL2$ BankL2$ Bank
Crossbar16 KB I$
8 KB D$
16 KB I$
8 KB D$
16 KB I$
8 KB D$
16 KB I$
8 KB D$
C8C7C6C5
16 KB I$
8 KB D$
16 KB I$
8 KB D$
16 KB I$
8 KB D$
16 KB I$
8 KB D$
L2$Bank
Memorycontroller
Memorycontroller
Memorycontroller
FPU
SPU
FPU
SPU
FPU
SPU
FPU
SPU
FPU
SPU
FPU
SPU
FPU
SPU
FPU
SPU
Crossbar
Memorycontroller
L2$Bank
L2$Bank
L2$Bank
L2$Bank
L2$Bank
L2$Bank
L2$Bank
SSI, JTAGDebug port
UltraSPARC T2: Server on a Chip
• 8 SPARC V9 cores @ 1.2–1.4GHz> 8 threads per core> 2 execution pipelines per core> 1 instruction/cycle per pipeline> 1 FPU per core> 1 SPU (crypto) per core> 4 MB, 16-way, 8-bank L2$
• 4 FB-DIMM DRAM controllers
• 2.5 GHz x 8 PCI-Express interface
• 2 x 10 Gb on-chip Ethernet
• Technology: TI 65nm
• Die size: 342mm2
• Power: < 95 W (nominal)
Dual-channelFB-DIMM
Dual-channelFB-DIMM
Dual-channelFB-DIMM
Dual-channelFB-DIMM
NIU PCIe
10 Gb Ethernet X8 @ 2.5 GHz2 GB/s each direction
42 GB/s read, 21 GB/s write
4 MB L2$
8 threads per core2 execution pipes1 op/cycle per pipe
x10 writex14 read@ 4.0 GT/s
2–8 DIMMs
New
Sys I/Fbuffer switch
core
31
UltraSPARC T2 Performance
Model BenchmarkSE T5220 SPECweb2005
SE T5120 & T5220 SPECjbb2005
SE T5220 Lotus Domino Notes
SE T5220 SPECjAppServer2004 2–Node
SE T5120 SAP SD 2-Tier
SE T5120 Database Tier, SPECjApp
SE T5220 SSL Performance, SPECweb2005
SE T5120 & T5220 SPEC CPU2006SE T5220 SPEC OMPM2001
Leadership Across All Tiers of the Datacenter
Unrivalled Performance / Watt & EfficiencySee Benchmarks on www.sun.com
NEW
32
• Leading cryptography performance> Over 30x greater RSA1024 performance than 2-socket IBM
p510> 15.6x better AES128 performance than crypto acclerator
card
• Best SSL performance per watt> 2.2x better performance/watt than 4-socket HP DL585G2> 1.6x better performance/watt than 2-socket HP DL380G5
• Supports ten most common ciphers and secure hashing functions
> RC4, DES, 3DES, AES-128, AES-192, AES-256, MD5,SHA-1, SHA-256, RSA 1024
Built-in Wirespeed Security
*See substantiation slides.
33
Now, we added UltraSPARC T2plus
• Multi-Socket UltraSPARC T2 Systems• Double throughput (again)• Double memory (again)• Double bandwidth• Free, Efficient Virtualization• Free, Fast Crypto
34
UltraSPARC T2 Plus: Multi-Socket US T2
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
• Per Socket> 8 cores @1.2GHz or 1.4GHz> 64 Threads per socket> 4MB L2$> 8 FPU's, 1 per core> 8 Crypto cores, 1 per core
> DES, 3DES, AES, RC4, SHA1, SHA256, MD5, RSA to 2048 key, ECC,CRC32
> 2 mem. Controllers, 16 DIMMS
> 25Read+13WriteGB/s Memory BW
> One x8 PCIe interface• Per system
> 2 sockets glue-less> 4 sockets using UST2 Plus
XBR> 16 or 32 PCIe lanes on 2 or
4 Socket systems• 65nm process technology
x8 @2.5GHz4GBytes/s
bi-directional
Full Cross Bar
●Power ~105W<1.5W/thread
CO
FPU
MAU
C1
FPU
MAU
C2
FPU
MAU
C3
FPU
MAU
C4
FPU
MAU
C5
FPU
MAU
C6
FPU
MAU
C7
FPU
MAU
L2$ L2$ L2$ L2$ L2$ L2$ L2$ L2$
CU CU CU CUMCU MCU
FB-DIMM
FB-DIMM
FB-DIMM
FB-DIMM
FB-DIMM
FB-DIMM
FB-DIMM
FB-DIMM
4 x Coherency
Links
System I/F PCI-Express
SSI Bus
35
Breakthrough Internet Infrastructure EconomicsJava Application Servers Run Faster, with Less Power,Less Heat, Less Spaceand Lower Costs
IBM p5702 x 4.7GHz POWER6Processors, AIX 5L
See Legal Substantiation Slides
Dell PowerEdge 29002 x 3GHz Xeon Processors, Windows Server 2003
Sun SPARC Enterprise T52403,331.31 SPECjAppServer2004 JOPS@Standard - 720 Watts
Performance Perf/Watt Space
2.8x 4x 1/2
5.1x 2.5x 40%
36
Breakthrough Backoffice Economics
Sun SPARC Enterprise T52404.170 SAP SD 2-Tier Users or 2,085 Users/RU
HP DL580G54 x 2.93GHz Xeon Processors, Windows Server 2003
ERP and Database Applications Run Faster,in Less Data Center Space
See Legal Substantiation Slides
IBM p5702 x 4.7GHz POWER6 Processors, AIX 5L
HP DL380G52 x 3.16GHz Xeon Processors, Windows Server 2003
Same 1,218
1/2 926.3
1/2 508.8
Space Users/RU
1.7x
1.13x
2.1x
Performance
37
Welcome To The CoolThreads FamilyPowerful, Eco-Efficient, Cool
T1000 T2000 T6300 T5120 T5220 T6320 T5140 T5240Height 1 RU 2RU Blade 1RU 2RU Blade 1RU 2RUCores 8 8 8 8 8 8 16 16Threads 32 32 32 64 64 64 128 128RAM 32GB 64GB 32GB 64GB 64GB 64GB 64GB 128GBDisks 2 4 4 4 8 4 4 16
Sun Proprietary/Confidential: Internal / NDA Customers Use Only
And We Just Got Started!
SPARC EnterpriseT5120/T5220
64 Threads64 GB RAM
SPARC EnterpriseT5140/T5240
128 Threads128 GB RAM
Sun Proprietary/Confidential: Sun Employees and Sun Partners Only
T5440256 Threads256 GB RAM
VeryNew
Sun Blade T630032 Threads32 GB RAM
SPARC EnterpriseT5120/T5220
64 Threads64 GB RAM
SPARC EnterpriseT5120/T5220
64 Threads64 GB RAM
Sun Blade T632064 Threads64 GB RAM
Scottsdale128 Threads128 GB RAM
39
Project Blackbox
40
Project Blackbox
●40% lower cost cooling●1/4 the space ●Reduces C02 emissions by 213 metric tons annually
The World’s First Virtualized Datacenter
* than traditional datacenters
41
Project Blackbox – Ecological Benefits
• 40% lower cooling costs vs traditional datacenter!> Significant lifetime savings
– Over 4 MW of electricity– Saving of $300K+
– Reduced CO2 footprint
• 8X smaller footprint> Less impact to immediate environment
• Portable form-factor– Can locate near renewable energy sources and away from
congested metro centers
42
Final Thought: Floating Data Centers• Tier1-Tier3 ECO Data Centers at US & International Ports
• Capacity: 4000 racks and over 350 black boxes
• 75MW of power, free cooling from ocean water
• Six months time to market, up to 40% less than traditional build
• At the end of a dock instead of the end of a street
44
Great resources
•http://slx.sun.com> great learning videos
•http://www.sun.com/bigadmin> everything + the forums
•http://blogs.sun.com> not only bitstream ;-)
45
DisclosuresSun Fire T1000 Server and Sun Fire T2000 Server power ratings taken from measurements collected during actual benchmark runs. Sun Fire T2000 Servers equipped with 450 Watt Power Supply Units
Sun Fire T1000 (8 cores, 1 chip) 10466 SPECweb2005. IBM System x3650 (4 cores, 2 chips) 9182 SPECweb2005. Dell PowerEdge 2850 (4 cores, 2 chips) 4,850 SPECweb2005SPEC, SPECweb reg tm of Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. Results from www.spec.org as of 08/20/2007. IBM x3650 power calculated as 70% of maximum input power using xSeries Power Configurator - version 4.4.2.28.
Sun Fire T2000 (8 cores, 1 chip) 16407 SPECweb2005; HP DL380 G5(8cores, 4 chips) 13257 SPECweb2005; IBM p5 550 (4 cores, 2 chips) 7881 SPECweb2005. SPEC, SPECweb reg tm of Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. Results as of 08/20/2007.
SPEC, SPECjAppServer are reg.TM of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. Results as of 08/20/2007. For the latest, visit http://www.spec.org. Comparisions are based on published results: 10 Sun Fire T6300 (80 cores, 10 chips) and 1 Sun Fire E6900 (48 cores, 24 chips): 8253.21 SPECjAppServer2004 JOPS@Standard. 6 HP rx6600 (48 cores, 24 chips) and HP 9000 Superdome (64 cores, 32 chips): 7629.45 SPECjAppServer2004 JOPS@Standard. 20 IBM xSeries BladeCenter HS20 (40 cores, 40 chips) and IBM eServer p5 570 (16 cores, 8 chips): 4368.02 SPECjAppServer2004 [email protected] rx6660 power calculated as 70% of maximum input power reported 07/25/07: http://h20341.www2.hp.com/integrity/cache/392325-0-0-225-121.html. IBM HS20 power calculated as 70% of maximum input power using xSeries Power Configurator - version 4.4.2.28. Sun Blade 6000 power was measured during the actual benchmarks.
Legal Notice: Sun's power calculators are subject to change without notice and are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, express or implied. Sun Microsystems does not make any representations regarding the use, validity, accuracy or reliability of the tool. The entire risk arising out of the use of these tools remains solely with the customer. In no event shall Sun Microsystems be liable for any direct, consequential, incidental, special, punitive or other damages, even if Sun is negligent or has been advised of the possibility of such damages, arising from use of these tools or the information provided herein.
46
Pricing SubstantiationSun SPARC Enterprise T5240 Comparisons:
DL580G5, - Base server price for HP DL580G5 with 4 x Intel Xeon x7350 2.93GHz processors, 16 x 2GB FB-DIMMs, Slimline DVD-ROM/CD-RW drive, 2 x 146GB 10k rpm SAS, RAID 1, Redundant PSUs, 2 x 1 Gigabit Ethernet, HP iLO Select Pack, 4 x 1GbE, Microsoft Windows 2003 Enterprise Edition with 25 CALs . Virtualization price for VMware ESX Virtual Infrastructure Standard 4 Processor License with 1 year coverage. 10GbE price for 2 x SR-fiber NC510F PCI-E adaptors. Crypto Acceleration price for Sun Crypto Accelerator 6000. From Sun Store pricing www.sun.com 01/25/08. Pricing from HP Store, www.hp.com, 02/15/08
IBM pricing from Sun Market Intelligence, 02/13/08. IBM p550 configured with 2 x 4.2 GHz Power6 processors, 16 x 2 GB DDR 2 DIMMS, 2 x 146 GB SAS HDD, RAID, 4 x 1GbE ports, 2 x 1700 Watt PSU, DVD-ROM, Rail kit, AIX 6.1. IBM Virtualisation costs based price of Hardware Management Console, IBM 10GbE costs based on Short Range fiber
Sun SPARC Enterprise T5240 configured with 2 x 1.2 GHz UltraSPARC T2 Plus 8 Core processors, 16 x 2 GB FBDIMMS, 2 x 146 GB SAS 2.5” HDD, RAID, 4 x 1GbE ports, 2 x 1100 Watt PSU, Slim DVD RW, Rail kit, 2 x 10GbE XAUI Adaptors, Solaris 10
47
Benchmark DisclosureSAP and all SAP logos are trademarks or registered trademarks of SAP AG in Germany and in several other countries. Results of two-tier SAP SD Standard Application Benchmarks as of April 9, 2008: The SPARC Enterprise Model T5240, 2 processors / 16 cores / 128 threads, UltraSPARC T2 Plus, 1.4 GHz, 8 KB(D) + 16 KB(I) L1 cache per core, 4 MB L2 cache per processor, 128 GB main memory; Number of benchmark users & comp.: 4,170 SD (Sales & Distribution); Average dialog response time: 1.97 seconds; Throughput: Fully Processed Order Line items/hour: 418,000, Dialog steps/hour: 1,254,000; SAPS: 20,900; Average DB request time (dia/upd): 0.085 sec / 0.238 sec; CPU utilization of central server: 99%; Operating System central server: Solaris 10; RDBMS: Oracle 10g; SAP ECC Release: 6.0. The SAP certification number was not available at press time and can be found at http://www.sap.com/benchmark. Sun SPARC Enterprise T5120 (1x1.4 GHz UltraSPARC T2 processor, 8 cores, 64 threads) running Solaris 10, Oracle 10g and the SAP ERP application Release 6.0 (2005) & 2,175 SAP SD benchmark users, Cert#200705. IBM System p570 (2 x 4.7 GHz POWER6 processors, 4 cores, 8 threads) 32 GB mem) running Oracle 10g, AIX 5L Version 5.3. SAP ECC Release 6.0 - 2035 SD benchmark users, 10180 SAPS, 1.99 sec avg response time, Certification number 2007037. HP ProLiant DL380 G5, (2x3.16 Ghz Quad-Core Intel Xeon Processor Model X5460, 8 cores, 8 threads) running Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition, SQL Server 2005 and the SAP ERP application Release 6.0 (2005) & 2,436 SAP SD benchmark users. Certification number 2007064. HP ProLiant DL580 G5, (X7350, 2.93 4x 2.93 Ghz Quad-Core Intel Xeon Processor Model X7350, 8 cores, 8 threads) running Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition, SQL Server 2005 and the SAP ERP application Release 6.0 (2005) & 3,705 SAP SD benchmark users, 18530 SAPS. Certification number 2007056.
Sun SPARC Enterprise T5240 (2 x 1200 Mhz UltraSPARC T2 Plus, 128GB), 6 partitions, Solaris [TM] 10,Lotus[R]Domino 7.0.1, 65,000 NotesBench R6iNotes users, $2.84 per user, 55,101 NotesMark tpm, 224 ms avg. IBM x3650 (2 x 3GHz Intel Xeon 5160, 24GB), 4 partitions, SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 9.0 SP3, Lotus[R]Domino 7.0, 22,000 NotesBench R6iNotes users, $3.47 per user, 17,777 NotesMark tpm, 3.056 seconds avg. IBM p5 560Q (4 x 4 core 1.8GHz Power 5+, 64GB), 6 partitions, AIX 5L V5.3, Lotus[R] Domino 7.0.1, 5,000 NotesBench R6iNotes users, $4.89 per user, 46,193 NotesMark tpm, 848 ms avg. HP BL480C (2 x 2.66GHz Intel Xeon X5355, 8GB), 3 partitions, Windows Server 2003, Lotus[R] Domino 7.0, 27,000 users, $13.27 per user, 23,117 NotesMark tpm, 0.764 seconds avg NotesBench R6iNotes. More info www.notesbench.org
IBM x3650 power consumption obtained from IBM Power configurator for system configured with 2 x Xeon 5160 3.0GHz processors, redundant PSU, 12 x 2GB DIMMs, and 2 x 74GB SAS drives, on 24/8/07.
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/bladecenter/powerconfig/. IBM p 560Q power rating of 1820W is estimated as 70% of maximum PSU rating published here on 03/26/07 Sun SPARC Enterprise T5240 power consumption taken from measurements made during the benchmark run.
SPEC, SPECjAppServer are registered trademarks of Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. All results from www.spec.org as of 4/5/08. SPECjAppServer2004: Sun SPARC Enterprise T5240 (16 cores, 2 chip) 3,331 JOPS@Standard. IBM p 570 (4 cores, 2 chips) 1,197.51 JOPS@Standard. Dell 2900 (4 cores, 2 chips) 652.93 JOPS@Standard. HP rx2660 (4 cores, 2 chips) 874.17 JOPS@Standard. HP BL460c (8 cores, 2 chips) of 2056.27 JOPS@Standard. IBM p 570 power rating of 1040W is estimated as 80% of maximum PSU rating published here on 4/4/2008: Dell PE 2900 power rating of 350 W is estimated as 70% of maximum PSU rating published here on 4/4/2008: Sun HP rx2660 power rating of 560 W is estimated as 70% of maximum PSU rating published here on 4/4/2008: SPARC Enterprise T5240 power consumption of 720 watts reported during benchmark run.
48
Benchmark DisclosureSPEC, SPECjbb reg tm of Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. All results as of 04/09/08 on http://www.spec.org. Sun SPARC Enterprise T5240 results submitted to SPEC. Other results as of 04/01/08 on www.spec.org Sun SPARC Enterprise T5240 (2 chips, 16 cores) 373,405 SPECjbb2005 bops, 23,338 SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM. IBM p 550 (4x4.2GHz Power6 chips, 8 cores) 333,779 SPECjbb2005 bops, 83445 SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM. HP rx6600 (4 x1.6 GHz Intel Intanium2 chips, 8 cores) 158174 SPECjbb2005 bops, 39544 SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM. IBM p 570 (2x4.2GHz Power6 chips, 4 cores) 175,474 SPECjbb2005 bops, 87737 SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM. Dell PowerEdge 6950 (4 chips, 8 cores) 176909 SPECjbb2005 bops, 44,227 SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM. Dell 6950 power rating of 1100W is estimated as 70% of maximum PSU rating published here on 4/4/08 IBM p 570 power rating of 1040W is estimated as 80% of maximum PSU rating published here on 06/07/07 HP rx6600 power rating of 1120W is estimated as 70% of maximum PSU rating published here on 03/23/08 Sun SPARC Enterprise T5240 power consumption taken from measurements made during the benchmark run.
SPEC, SPEC OMPM2001 , SPEC OMPL2001 registered trademarks of Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. Sun SPARC Enterprise T5240 server, (2x1.4 GHz, UltraSPARC T2 Plus chips, 16 cores, 128 threads) 25,488 SPEC OMPM2001. Competitive results from www.spec.org as of April 7, 2008. IBM System p5720 (2x4.7GHz POWER6 chips, 4 cores, 8 threads) 20,433 SPEC OMPM2001. IBM System p5 550 (2x2.1GHz POWER5+ chips, 4 cores, 8 threads) 19,983 SPEC OMPM2001. Unisys ES7000/One (32 x3.4GHz Xeon 7140 chips , 64 cores, 64 threads) 24,632 SPEC OMPM2001.