Streamgage Datum
ConversionGreat Lakes Region Height Modernization Consortium
meetingNew Cumberland, PA April
13, 2011
Topics for Discussion
Problem from USGS Water perspective
Database Facts How Height Modernization might help
the conversion effort?
Problem
Most USGS streamgages have a datum surveyed or estimated to NGVD29.
Streamgages established since 2002 and surveyed using a Global Positioning System (GPS) should have datum set to NAVD88.
Problem
Problem
Problem
Problem Mixing vertical Datums creates
confusion; This mixture of Altitude Datums
has created a confusing situation for streamgage information users attempting to model flood plain inundation, establish flood profiles or use other hydrologic applications.
In some areas of the country, the difference between NGVD29 and NAVD88 can be over 4 feet.
Partner Applications of Information – NWS AHPS
Partner Applications of Information – NWS AHPS
USGS/NWS/FEMA Flood Inundation Initiatives
Policy Guidance from USGS
NAVD88 is the recommended datum established in the Federal Geographic Data framework (Office of Water Information Technical memorandum 2002.01).
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
Alabam
a
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Florida
Georgia
Haw
aii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New
_Jersey
New
_Mexico
New
_York
North_C
arolina
North_D
akota
Ohio
Oklahom
a
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto_R
ico
South_C
arolina
South_D
akota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Virginia
Washington
West_V
irginia
Wisconsin
Wyom
ing
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
Califo
rnia
Colorado
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New_Jersey
New_York
North
_Carolina
North
_Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto
_Rico
South_Carolina
Texas
Utah
Virginia
Washington
West_Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
NAVDof 1988
NGVDof 1929
SW Station Datums in the USGS NWIS
>48,200 SW stations
>2,200 SW stations
Database facts
84,944 Surface-Water sites 62,032 determined elevation from Maps 7,737 from Levels 8,023 unknown source 1,269 from a GPS
4,771 already reported to NAVD88
Database facts
84,944 Surface-Water sites 62,032 determined elevation from Maps Convert these to NAVD88 directly
because within existing accuracy limitations unless a determination of need for more accuracy due to data use.
Database facts
125 sites in NGS database (NGSIDB)for NAVD88 have a “gage” description. Assumed to be USGS streamgages Additional sites may be present but did
not show up in the search Approximately 17,000 sites need to
have some analysis and conversion.
NGS assistance in GPS surveys
NGS is doing updating work and GPS surveys throughout the country North Carolina and Michigan -- Will
survey in at least one reference mark at active gages in work areas
Working on best ways to easily provide reference mark descriptions and gage locations to contractors doing this work and best way to report back to USGS.
Priority stations
USGS, NGS, USACE and NWS developing priority lists of gages for conversion Pilot study in Missouri
MO has been working with Darrell Pratte, NGS Geodetic Coordinator with the Missouri DNR. Darrell has volunteered to serve in a role of oversight for field surveys and provide some personnel.
Plan was developed for conversion of gages in Missouri. Includes survey plans for those stations identified as needing that level of attention.
Priority stations
David Ulrey of USACE is working on the same effort for their streamgages. Some gages are common to both agencies so David and Paul Rydlund (USGS) will be coordinating. (Comprehensive Elevation of Project Datum – CEPD).
There is generally a lot of interest when this is discussed with other agencies and organizations. People see the need even if they don’t have the resources.
Priority stations
USGS, USACE, NOS and NWS developing priority lists of gages for conversion Pilot study in Coastal Texas
TCOON (Texas Coastal Ocean Observation Network) and Texas A&M--Corpus Christi
Seeking funding to upgrade USGS sites to meet NOS tidal gage standards, both NAVD88 and local tidal datum.
Next “beta” areas are the North Atlantic coast and the Great Lakes
Funding Sources
Unfunded mandate to USGS Water Science Centers
Some will need GPS surveys to meet required accuracies or because of instability issues.
Can the Great Lakes Height Mod partner with the USGS efforts?
Issues to be resolved
Accuracy of the conversion. Resources
Time and manpower Money
Data already converted to elevation in database – Florida efforts
Questions and Comments??