Safety issues for WP2Safety issues for WP2E. Baussan on behalf of WP2E. Baussan on behalf of WP2
10/06/2011 1st Euronu Safety Workshop Safety Issues for WP2
2
Safety Issues for WP2
Outlines:Outlines:
– Physics with a neutrino superbeamPhysics with a neutrino superbeam
– Technological ChallengeTechnological Challenge– Status on WP2Status on WP2– SafetySafety
• ALARA ApproachALARA Approach• SimulationSimulation
10/06/2011 1st Euronu Safety Workshop Safety Issues for WP2
3
Neutrino Beam Experiments
10/06/2011 1st Euronu Safety Workshop Safety Issues for WP2
4
HP-SPL for neutrino beams
10/06/2011 1st Euronu Safety Workshop Safety Issues for WP2
5
Super Beam Neutrino Experiment Layout
10/06/2011 1st Euronu Safety Workshop Safety Issues for WP2
6
Super Beam Neutrino Experiment Layout
10/06/2011 1st Euronu Safety Workshop Safety Issues for WP2
7
Super Beam Neutrino Experiment Layout
Memphys Detector:
• Underground water Cherenkov detector at Underground water Cherenkov detector at Laboratoire Laboratoire Souterrain de ModaneSouterrain de Modane Fréjus at 4800 m.w.e. Fréjus at 4800 m.w.e.
• Total fiducial volume: up to 400 kton: 3 x 65mX60 Total fiducial volume: up to 400 kton: 3 x 65mX60 modules could be designed up to 572kton: 3x 65mX80mmodules could be designed up to 572kton: 3x 65mX80m
• PMT R&D + detailed study on excavation existing & PMT R&D + detailed study on excavation existing & ongoing + prototype Cherenkov detector MEMPHYNOongoing + prototype Cherenkov detector MEMPHYNO
• Underground water Cherenkov detector at Underground water Cherenkov detector at Laboratoire Laboratoire Souterrain de ModaneSouterrain de Modane Fréjus at 4800 m.w.e. Fréjus at 4800 m.w.e.
• Total fiducial volume: up to 400 kton: 3 x 65mX60 Total fiducial volume: up to 400 kton: 3 x 65mX60 modules could be designed up to 572kton: 3x 65mX80mmodules could be designed up to 572kton: 3x 65mX80m
• PMT R&D + detailed study on excavation existing & PMT R&D + detailed study on excavation existing & ongoing + prototype Cherenkov detector MEMPHYNOongoing + prototype Cherenkov detector MEMPHYNO
10/06/2011 1st Euronu Safety Workshop Safety Issues for WP2
8
Technological challenge
10/06/2011 1st Euronu Safety Workshop Safety Issues for WP2
9
Target Technology
10/06/2011 1st Euronu Safety Workshop Safety Issues for WP2
10
Target Technology
10/06/2011 1st Euronu Safety Workshop Safety Issues for WP2
11
Horn : Previous Studies
• Beam and Target Parameter:
10/06/2011 1st Euronu Safety Workshop Safety Issues for WP2
12
Horn: status for WP2
10/06/2011 1st Euronu Safety Workshop Safety Issues for WP2
13
Horn: status for WP2
10/06/2011 1st Euronu Safety Workshop Safety Issues for WP2
14
Horn: Dynamic Stress Analyses due to Thermal and Magnetic pulsesHorn: Dynamic Stress Analyses due to Thermal and Magnetic pulses
Dynamic stresses are due to Transient Joule heating due to the
current passing through the horn’s skin
Secondary Particles Magnetic Pulses/forces
Pulse: 100μsT=1/50/4s=0.08s
von Mises stresses due to thermal loads
magnetic pressure on the horn
stress vs time in the horn, 25pulses
static stress
deformation
10/06/2011 1st Euronu Safety Workshop Safety Issues for WP2
15
Horn: Static stress, deformation
dynamic stress superimposed on the quasi-static stress are the basis of the fatigue life time estimate of the horn – work ongoing
in order to assess the horn deformation and horn life time, the calculation of the stress inside the horn is necessary. The stress level in the structure should be low enough in comparison with the fatigue limit of the materials. Loads coming from the magnetic pressure and the thermal dilatation of the material
9.9mm 10.5mm
displacement due to magnetic pressure
displacement due to magnetic pressure and thermal dilatation
Horn without integrated target
horn with integrated target: highly stress domain exists on the inner conductor and in the right angles connection domains + high energy deposition on the inner conductor
Horn with separated target and rounded back-plate, corners
10/06/2011 1st Euronu Safety Workshop Safety Issues for WP2
16
Horn: status for WP2
Target Station Baseline :Target Station Baseline :• Solid Static targetSolid Static target• Use multiple 4 targets+ hornsUse multiple 4 targets+ horns• Beam frequency 12.5 HzBeam frequency 12.5 Hz• Cooling (EUROnu WP2 Note 10-06)Cooling (EUROnu WP2 Note 10-06)• Power distribution due to Joule losses & Power distribution due to Joule losses &
secondary particlessecondary particles• Energy balance, to maintain working Energy balance, to maintain working
temperaturetemperature• Flow rateFlow rate• Jet distribution along the outer Jet distribution along the outer
conductorconductor• h correlation for jets’ geometryh correlation for jets’ geometry
Target Station Baseline :Target Station Baseline :• Solid Static targetSolid Static target• Use multiple 4 targets+ hornsUse multiple 4 targets+ horns• Beam frequency 12.5 HzBeam frequency 12.5 Hz• Cooling (EUROnu WP2 Note 10-06)Cooling (EUROnu WP2 Note 10-06)• Power distribution due to Joule losses & Power distribution due to Joule losses &
secondary particlessecondary particles• Energy balance, to maintain working Energy balance, to maintain working
temperaturetemperature• Flow rateFlow rate• Jet distribution along the outer Jet distribution along the outer
conductorconductor• h correlation for jets’ geometryh correlation for jets’ geometry
10/06/2011 1st Euronu Safety Workshop Safety Issues for WP2
17
Feed back from other neutrino beam experiments
Striplines plate with soft transition
• Recommandations from others Recommandations from others facilities:facilities:– Cracks in weldsCracks in welds– Use flexible pipes to reduce stress and Use flexible pipes to reduce stress and
fatiguefatigue– Water leaks due to galvanic corrosion Water leaks due to galvanic corrosion
=> avoid trapped water and choose => avoid trapped water and choose material carefullymaterial carefully
– Use semi flexible conductor because Use semi flexible conductor because of important magnetic force between of important magnetic force between stripline => can break cablestripline => can break cable
– Heat dissipation of the striplineHeat dissipation of the stripline– Remote design for repairing/exchangeRemote design for repairing/exchange– Need SparesNeed Spares– ……
• Recommandations from others Recommandations from others facilities:facilities:– Cracks in weldsCracks in welds– Use flexible pipes to reduce stress and Use flexible pipes to reduce stress and
fatiguefatigue– Water leaks due to galvanic corrosion Water leaks due to galvanic corrosion
=> avoid trapped water and choose => avoid trapped water and choose material carefullymaterial carefully
– Use semi flexible conductor because Use semi flexible conductor because of important magnetic force between of important magnetic force between stripline => can break cablestripline => can break cable
– Heat dissipation of the striplineHeat dissipation of the stripline– Remote design for repairing/exchangeRemote design for repairing/exchange– Need SparesNeed Spares– ……
Safety in the SB FrameworkSafety in the SB Framework
10/06/2011 1st Euronu Safety Workshop Safety Issues for WP2
19
Toward a safety WP2 roadmap
10/06/2011 1st Euronu Safety Workshop Safety Issues for WP2
20
Design
Design of the SB line : Design of the SB line : • Proton Driver lineProton Driver line• Experimental Hall Experimental Hall
– MW Target StationMW Target Station– Decay TunnelDecay Tunnel– Beam DumpBeam Dump
• Maintenance RoomMaintenance Room• Service GalleryService Gallery
– Power supplyPower supply– Cooling systemCooling system– Air-Ventilation systemAir-Ventilation system
• Waste AreaWaste Area
20
deca
y tu
nnel
(25
m)
spare area
beam
target/horn station
shielding
beam dump
horn power supply and electronics
gallery
hot cell
10/06/2011 1st Euronu Safety Workshop Safety Issues for WP2
21
Safety : Elements
MW Target Station :MW Target Station :• Focusing SystemFocusing System• Crane System Crane System • Automated robotAutomated robot• Mechanical structure for the for hornMechanical structure for the for horn• Dose Rate Monitoring System Dose Rate Monitoring System • Residual Dose Rate PlateformResidual Dose Rate Plateform• Operation under helium AtmosphereOperation under helium Atmosphere
– flushing with airflushing with air– filter to measure radioactive pollution (dust, tritium …)filter to measure radioactive pollution (dust, tritium …)
• Investigation of other radionucleides transport Investigation of other radionucleides transport (environmental constraint)(environmental constraint)
• ……
10/06/2011 1st Euronu Safety Workshop Safety Issues for WP2
22
Complementary infrastructures
*Schematic diagram of the main *Schematic diagram of the main cooling plantcooling plant
Conceptual design of the SPL II, A high-power superconducting H- linac at CERN – CERN-2006-006 - 12 July 2006SPL Cooling system :SPL Cooling system :
Complementary plants needed for Complementary plants needed for - cooling the 4 horns, decay tunnel and beam dump- cooling the 4 horns, decay tunnel and beam dump - cooling and recirculating helium inside the vessel- cooling and recirculating helium inside the vessel
10/06/2011 1st Euronu Safety Workshop Safety Issues for WP2
23
Complementary infrastructures
Conceptual design of the SPL II, A high-power superconducting H- linac at CERN – CERN-2006-006 - 12 July 2006Electrical infrastructure :Electrical infrastructure :
Complementary plants needed for the Complementary plants needed for the super beam infrastruturesuper beam infrastruture - alimentation station for the horns - alimentation station for the horns - air conditioning installation- air conditioning installation
10/06/2011 1st Euronu Safety Workshop Safety Issues for WP2
24
Radiation simulation : shielding investigationRadiation simulation : shielding investigation
Target:Target: - - MaterialMaterial : Graphite: Graphite - Cylinder- Cylinder : 130 cm x 4mm (Diameter): 130 cm x 4mm (Diameter)
Shielding for the Target Station :Shielding for the Target Station : - Walls and roofWalls and roof : 80 cm of Iron,: 80 cm of Iron, 8 Slabs (2.5m x 2m x10cm) 8 Slabs (2.5m x 2m x10cm) - Lateral and Front Marble SlabsLateral and Front Marble Slabs- Front Iron SlabFront Iron Slab
Beam Features (CNGS like):Beam Features (CNGS like): - Proton Energy - Proton Energy : 400 GeV/c: 400 GeV/c - Intensity - Intensity : 8.0 10: 8.0 101212 pps pps - Irradiation time : 200 days- Irradiation time : 200 days
Evolution of the DER with time performed Evolution of the DER with time performed with FLUKA 2011.2.3 with FLUKA 2011.2.3
Horn:Horn: - - MaterialMaterial : Anticorodal 110: Anticorodal 110
10/06/2011 1st Euronu Safety Workshop Safety Issues for WP2
25
Radiation simulation : shielding investigationRadiation simulation : shielding investigation
DER (mSv/h) after stopping irradiationDER (mSv/h) after stopping irradiation DER (mSv/h) after 1hour of cooling timeDER (mSv/h) after 1hour of cooling time
DER (mSv/h) after 1day of cooling timeDER (mSv/h) after 1day of cooling time DER (mSv/h) after 1month of cooling timeDER (mSv/h) after 1month of cooling time
10/06/2011 1st Euronu Safety Workshop Safety Issues for WP2
26
Radiation simulation : shielding investigationRadiation simulation : shielding investigation
Target:Target: - - MaterialMaterial : Titanium: Titanium - Cylinder- Cylinder : 78 cm x 1.5mm (Diameter): 78 cm x 1.5mm (Diameter)
Shielding for the Target Station :Shielding for the Target Station : - Walls and roof: 80 cm of Iron,Walls and roof: 80 cm of Iron, 8 Slabs (2.5m x 2m x10cm) 8 Slabs (2.5m x 2m x10cm) - Lateral and Front Marble SlabsLateral and Front Marble Slabs- Front Iron SlabFront Iron Slab
Beam Features:Beam Features: - Proton Energy - Proton Energy : 4,5 GeV/c: 4,5 GeV/c - Intensity - Intensity : 18. 10: 18. 101414 pps pps - Irradiation time : 200 days- Irradiation time : 200 days
Evolution of the DER with time performed Evolution of the DER with time performed with FLUKA 2011.2.3 with FLUKA 2011.2.3
Horn:Horn: - - MaterialMaterial : Anticorodal 110: Anticorodal 110
ConcreteIron
Marble
10/06/2011 1st Euronu Safety Workshop Safety Issues for WP2
27
Radiation simulation : shielding investigationRadiation simulation : shielding investigation
DER (mSv/h) after stopping irradiationDER (mSv/h) after stopping irradiation DER (mSv/h) after 1 hour of cooling timeDER (mSv/h) after 1 hour of cooling time
DER (mSv/h) after 1 day of cooling timeDER (mSv/h) after 1 day of cooling time DER (mSv/h) after 1month of cooling timeDER (mSv/h) after 1month of cooling time
10/06/2011 1st Euronu Safety Workshop Safety Issues for WP2
28
Radiation simulations : Four Horn StationRadiation simulations : Four Horn Station
Four horn station layoutFour horn station layout
Chemical composition of Chemical composition of Material:Material:
Target => Ti(100%)Target => Ti(100%)
Horn => Horn => Anticorodal 110 alloyAnticorodal 110 alloyAl (95.5%), Si(1,3%), Mg(1,2%), Cr(0.2%), Al (95.5%), Si(1,3%), Mg(1,2%), Cr(0.2%),
Mn(1%),Mn(1%), Fe (0.5%), Zn(0.2%), Cu(0.1%)Fe (0.5%), Zn(0.2%), Cu(0.1%)
Decay Pipe => Decay Pipe => Steel P355NHSteel P355NHFe(96.8%), Mn(1.65%), Si(0.5%), Cr(0.3%), Fe(96.8%), Mn(1.65%), Si(0.5%), Cr(0.3%), Ni(0.3%), C(0.2%)Ni(0.3%), C(0.2%)
Tunnel => Tunnel => ConcreteConcrete O(52.9%), Si(33.7%), Ca(4.4%), Al(3,49%), O(52.9%), Si(33.7%), Ca(4.4%), Al(3,49%), Na(1,6%), Fe(1.4%), K(1,3%), H(1%), Na(1,6%), Fe(1.4%), K(1,3%), H(1%), Mn(0.2%), C(0.01%)Mn(0.2%), C(0.01%)
Surrounding Environment => Surrounding Environment => MolasseMolasseO(49%), Si(20%), Ca,(9.7%), Al(6.4%), O(49%), Si(20%), Ca,(9.7%), Al(6.4%), C(5%), Fe(3.9%), Mg(3.2%), K(1%), C(5%), Fe(3.9%), Mg(3.2%), K(1%), Na(0.5%), Mn(0.1%)Na(0.5%), Mn(0.1%)
10/06/2011 1st Euronu Safety Workshop Safety Issues for WP2
29
Simulations : Energy deposition for the Four Horn StationSimulations : Energy deposition for the Four Horn Station
Beam dump energy deposition (kW/cm3)Beam dump energy deposition (kW/cm3) Energy deposition (kW/cmEnergy deposition (kW/cm33) in the all layout) in the all layout
Beam dump energy deposition (kW/cm3)Beam dump energy deposition (kW/cm3)Target station energy deposition (kW/cm3)Target station energy deposition (kW/cm3)
Transverse viewTransverse view
Front viewFront view
Transverse viewTransverse view
Transverse viewTransverse view
10/06/2011 1st Euronu Safety Workshop Safety Issues for WP2
30
Radiation simulations : Four Horn StationRadiation simulations : Four Horn Station
Evolution of the target activity with cooling time:Evolution of the target activity with cooling time:
Radioactivity after 1 day (Bq.cmRadioactivity after 1 day (Bq.cm -3-3))
Radionucleides after 1 day (Z,A)Radionucleides after 1 day (Z,A)
10/06/2011 1st Euronu Safety Workshop Safety Issues for WP2
31
Radiation simulations : Four Horn StationRadiation simulations : Four Horn Station
Evolution of the horn activity with cooling time:Evolution of the horn activity with cooling time:
Radioactivity after 1 day (Bq.cmRadioactivity after 1 day (Bq.cm -3-3))
Radionucleides after 1 day (Z,A) Radionucleides after 1 day (Z,A)
10/06/2011 1st Euronu Safety Workshop Safety Issues for WP2
32
Radiations simulations : Four Horn StationRadiations simulations : Four Horn Station
DER (mSv/h) after 1d of cooling timeDER (mSv/h) after 1d of cooling time DER (mSv/h) after 1m of cooling timeDER (mSv/h) after 1m of cooling time
DER (mSv/h) after 6m of cooling timeDER (mSv/h) after 6m of cooling time DER (mSv/h) after 1y of cooling timeDER (mSv/h) after 1y of cooling time
Evolution of the horn activity with cooling time:Evolution of the horn activity with cooling time:
10/06/2011 1st Euronu Safety Workshop Safety Issues for WP2
33
Radiation simulations : All LayoutRadiation simulations : All Layout
DER (mSv/h) after 1d of cooling timeDER (mSv/h) after 1d of cooling time DER (mSv/h) after 1m of cooling timeDER (mSv/h) after 1m of cooling time
DER (mSv/h) after 6m of cooling timeDER (mSv/h) after 6m of cooling time DER (mSv/h) after 1y of cooling timeDER (mSv/h) after 1y of cooling time
10/06/2011 1st Euronu Safety Workshop Safety Issues for WP2
34
Radiation simulations : Four Horn StationRadiation simulations : Four Horn Station
Next Steps :– Full Design simulation of the installation– Contribution of each element to the dose rate– Individual and collective dose rate calculation
with cooling times– Intervention Scenarios (normal operation,
maintenance, emergency….)– Costing