Thomas IngrahamPublishing Editor, F1000Research [email protected]
Conventional publishing Model
F1000research publishing Model
Enabling early access to results
Pre-print server OA JournalEarly access to results & data Editorial input
Precedence for authors Peer review & indexing
Multiple versions Publication ethics
No Editor in Chief Perfected paper OA
Open peer review
Decision based on scientific soundness
Versioning
Versioning
Publishing data & code
publishing raw data and source code
Uses •Exploratory analyses, LOD, reproducibility checks (data, reanalyses + software)
Linking with Research Articles
•Better metadata/documentation
•Quality control
Software Tool Articles & Data Articles•Big/small datasets – no analyses
•Software packages/web tools
•Even better metadata/documentation
•Versioning – updates & point releases
•High visibility
•More credit (quantity and quality)
Requirements for data and code
Interoperable formats
Metadata
All?
Workflow & repositories
Submission
Pre-Pub Check Publish Peer
review
Repository
Crosslink
Further requests
F1000Research curates approved
repo list
Credit for data and software
Data availability:
Repository: Data entry title, PID [Ref]
[Ref] Author Names. Data entry title [v]. Repository. Year. PID
Cite the data or the Data Article?
Clear accessibility info and actively encourage data/software citation
Software availability:
Software access (opt): URL
Latest source code (opt): VCS URL
Archived entry: Repository: Software title, PID [Ref]
Licence: OSI
[Ref] Author Names. Software title [v]. Repository. Year. PID
INTERGRATION, VISUALIZATION & ANALYSIS OF DATA
Living figures: Data + Code
Colomb & Brembs: http://f1000research.com/articles/3-176/v1
Challenges
Sensitive data
•Protected repositories
•HIPPA-compliant (safe harbour)
•DataSHIELD
Other challenges
•Rawness & granularity
Jisc Bodleian 1-click data submission Project
Reducing the friction data sharing
SUMMARY: F1000RESEARCH’S APPROACH TO OPEN SCIENCE
• Near-immediate publicationOpen, invited peer review conducted after publication
• Transparent peer-reviewSigned referee reports and author responses published alongside each article
• No editorial biasPublication of all findings, including null results, software tools and data notes.
• Data includedAll research articles accompanied by the data on which they are based
ANNOTATOR PLUGIN
PREDICTS CITATIONS
COLLABORATE