PAF Indicators Performance Family Group Comparison Report 2007/8 k to add title
Adults & Older People
Information Produced by Research and Information Section Community, Health and Social Care Directorate Crompton House
A80 – Participation on drug treatment programmes (interface) – The percentage year on year change in the number of problem drug misusers accessing treatment services. (BVPI 198)
l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l- <90 90<99.99 100 - - - - -
Low High
0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00
Plymouth UAOldham
Sandw ellWalsall
CoventryNorth Tyneside
SalfordRochdale
WolverhamptonNew castle upon Tyne
Bristol UAGateshead
Kingston upon Hull UASheff ield
Darlington UA
Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 97.14 103.99Metropolitan 97.67 104.26Family 69.89 104.68SALFORD 97.89 104.43
B11 – Intensive Home Care as a percentage of Intensive Residential Care – The number of households receiving intensive home help/care as a percentage of all adults and older people in residential and nursing care and households receiving intensive home help/care.
l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l0<10 10<16 16<20 20<27 27<45 45<59 59<73 73<100 -
Low High
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Kingston upon Hull UANorth Tyneside
Plymouth UABristol UA
Darlington UAWolverhampton
GatesheadWalsall
RochdaleSandw ellSheff ieldTameside
OldhamCoventry
New castle upon TyneSalford
Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 23.60 25.20 26.87 28.07 29.33Metropolitan 26.10 27.40 28.75 29.36 29.33Family 23.70 25.60 27.16 28.14 29.34SALFORD 36.50 33.70 36.68 37.76 39.26
B12 – Cost of Intensive Social Care for Adults and Older People – Average gross weekly expenditure per person on supporting adults and older people in residential and nursing care and providing intensive home care. (BVPI 52)
ll lll llll lll ll0<319 319<342 342<455 455<487 >=487
Low High
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
CoventryBristol UA
GatesheadSandw ell
Plymouth UAWolverhampton
WalsallSalford
New castle upon TyneKingston upon Hull
RochdaleNorth Tyneside
SheffieldDarlington UA
OldhamTameside Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8
England 44.29 478.00 514.73 540.39 559.70Metropolitan 405.92 437.00 481.87 506.11 526.25Family 417.51 438.90 444.94 476.57 530.70SALFORD 421.72 469.00 494.88 534.73 541.98
Group 2 bandings
Note: Darlington, Gateshead, Kingston upon Hull, Newcastle upon Tyne, North Tyneside, Plymouth and Sheffield are Group 1 Authorities
B17 – Unit cost of home care for Adults and Older People – Average gross hourly cost for home help/care.
ll lll llll lll ll0<9.77 9.77<10.48 10.486<13.96 13.96>15.58 >=15.58
Low High
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00
Bristol UAWolverhampton
Plymouth UAWalsall
GatesheadNorth Tyneside
RochdaleNew castle upon Tyne
Sheff ieldTameside
CoventrySalford
OldhamDarlington UA
Sandw ellKingston upon Hull UA
Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 12.93 13.59 14.47 14.57 14.50Metropolitan 12.43 12.58 13.82 13.97 14.37Family 14.45 13.60 13.92 14.15 14.35SALFORD 14.86 11.64 11.24 12.07 12.71
Group 2 bandings
Note: Darlington, Gateshead, Kingston upon Hull, Newcastle upon Tyne, North Tyneside, Plymouth and Sheffield are Group 1 Authorities
C28 – Intensive Home Care – Households receiving intensive home care per 1,000 population aged 65 or over. (BVPI 53) – Key Threshold
l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l0<4 4<8 8<12 12<16 16+ - - - -
Low High
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0
North TynesideWolverhampton
Bristol UAKingston upon Hull
Plymouth UAWalsall
CoventrySandw ell
Darlington UAGateshead
RochdaleSheff ieldTameside
OldhamNew castle upon Tyne
Salford
Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 11.10 11.50 12.19 12.47 12.75Metropolitan 14.50 14.08 15.21 15.11 15.24Family 14.10 14.90 15.62 15.64 15.95SALFORD 25.20 24.00 22.98 22.27 22.93
C29 – Adults with physical disabilities helped to live at home – Adults with physical disabilities helped to live at home per 1,000 population aged 18-64.
l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l0<1.7 1.7<3.4 3.4<4.2 4.2<5 5+ - - - -
Low High
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
CoventryPlymouth UA
WolverhamptonBristol UASandw ell
WalsallNew castle upon Tyne
SheffieldRochdale
North TynesideOldham
Darlington UASalford
GatesheadTameside
Kingston upon Hull
Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 4.20 4.20 4.47 4.54 4.68Metropolitan 4.90 4.40 4.62 4.48 4.48Family 5.40 4.90 4.64 5.15 5.30SALFORD 4.20 11.80 8.00 9.49 6.65
C30 – Adults with learning disabilities helped to live at home – Adults with learning disabilities helped to live at home per 1,000 population aged 18-64.
l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l0<1 1<2 2<2.5 2.5<3 3+ - - - -
Low High
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0
Bristol UASandw ell
Wolverhampton
Kingston upon Hull UASheff ield
CoventryPlymouth UA
North Tyneside
GatesheadWalsall
Rochdale
New castle upon TyneDarlington UA
SalfordOldham
Tameside
Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 2.70 2.70 2.79 2.87 2.95Metropolitan 3.00 3.10 3.21 3.29 3.36Family 3.30 3.10 3.19 3.23 3.25SALFORD 4.10 4.30 4.37 4.41 4.08
l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l0<0.3 0.3<1.3 1.3<1.8 1.8<2.3 2.3+ - - - -
Low High
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0
North TynesideKingston upon Hull UA
GatesheadNew castle upon Tyne
Sandw ellWolverhampton
SalfordCoventry
SheffieldBristol UA
WalsallDarlington UA
Plymouth UARochdale
TamesideOldham
Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 3.40 3.70 3.80 4.28 4.54Metropolitan 3.80 3.80 3.72 4.20 4.17Family 3.70 4.10 4.22 5.06 5.40SALFORD 1.80 2.50 2.63 4.84 3.95
C31 – Adults with mental health problems helped to live at home – Adults with mental health problems helped to live at home per 1,000 population aged 18-64.
C32 – Older people helped to live at home – Older people helped to live at home per 1,000 population aged 65 or over. (BVPI 54)
l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l0<55 55<80 80<90 90<100 100+ - - - -
Low High
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Plymouth UACoventry
WalsallOldham
Sandw ellWolverhampton
Darlington UARochdaleSheffield
Bristol UANew castle upon Tyne
North TynesideTameside
SalfordKingston upon Hull UA
Gateshead
Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 3.40 3.70 80.94 80.13 81.79Metropolitan 3.80 3.80 91.65 88.57 87.03Family 3.70 4.10 88.66 90.83 89.98SALFORD 1.80 2.50 119.98 120.77 105.78
C51 – Direct payments – Adults and Older People receiving direct payments at 31st March per 100,000 population aged 18 or over (age standardised). – (BVPI 201) - Key Threshold
l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l0<15 15<30 30<90 90<150 150+ - - - -
Low High
0 50 100 150 200 250
Oldham
Kingston upon Hull UA
Bristol UA
Tameside
Rochdale
Walsall
Plymouth UA
Gateshead
Wolverhampton
Sandw ell
Darlington UA
New castle upon Tyne
North Tyneside
Coventry
Sheffield
Salford
Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 36.30 56.70 81.36 103.10 140.68Metropolitan 33.20 53.20 77.00 98.30 130.91Family 35.10 53.40 84.79 99.72 126.68SALFORD 38.40 68.00 108.03 152.16 203.17
C62 – Services for Carers – The number of carers receiving a specific carer’s service as a percentage of clients receiving community based services.
l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l0<3 3<6 6<9 9<12 12+
Low High
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0
Plymouth UAOldham
RochdaleSandw ell
WalsallSheff ieldCoventry
Kingston upon HullGateshead
Darlington UANorth TynesideWolverhampton
Bristol UATameside
New castle upon TyneSalford
Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 9.00 9.51 11.65 13.60Metropolitan 6.90 8.12 10.89 13.46Family 6.00 8.29 9.96 13.03SALFORD 2.50 7.53 9.30 19.26
C72 – Admissions of supported residents aged 65 or over to residential/nursing care (KT) – The number of Older people aged 65 or over admitted on a permanent basis in the year to residential or nursing care
l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l - - - - <90 90<100 100<110 110<120 120+
Low High
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Kingston upon Hull UATameside
OldhamRochdale
New castle upon TyneDarlington UA
GatesheadWalsall
Bristol UASalford
Sheff ieldWolverhamptonNorth Tyneside
Plymouth UASandw ellCoventry Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8
England 97.60 90.50 85.96 79.91 74.48Metropolitan 108.80 100.80 93.11 91.17 81.51Family 112.30 103.30 97.07 94.56 85.36SALFORD 112.30 104.50 98.70 114.61 84.37
C73 – Admissions of supported residents aged 18-64 to residential/nursing care - Adults aged 18-64 admitted on a permanent basis in the year to residential or nursing care per 10,000 population aged 18-64.
l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l - - - - <1.5 1.5<2.5 2.5<3.5 3.5<4.5 4.5+
Low High
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
RochdaleWalsall
New castle upon TynePlymouth UA
Bristol UASheffield
Darlington UAWolverhampton
SalfordNorth Tyneside
Kingston upon Hull UASandw ellCoventryTameside
GatesheadOldham Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8
England 1.96 1.75 1.51Metropolitan 1.78 1.78 1.56Family 2.24 1.89 1.74SALFORD 2.58 1.62 1.60
D37 – Availability of single rooms – The percentage of single adults and older people going into permanent residential and nursing care who were allocated single rooms.
l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l0<80 80<85 85<90 90<95 95<100 - - - -
Low High
91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101
WalsallCoventry
Bristol UA
SalfordSandw ellSheff ield
WolverhamptonPlymouth UA
TamesideKingston upon Hull UA
RochdaleNew castle upon Tyne
Darlington UA
North TynesideGateshead
Oldham
Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 92.50 94.10 95.27 96.24 97.27Metropolitan 93.90 94.90 95.73 96.98 97.35Family 97.20 96.50 97.44 97.91 98.30SALFORD 92.50 94.00 96.06 95.70 96.08
D39 – Percentage of people receiving a statement of their needs and how they will be met – The percentage of adults and older people receiving a statement of their needs and how they will be met. (BVPI 58)
l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l0<80 80<90.85 90.85<96 96<100 100 - - - -
Low High
86 88 90 92 94 96 98 100 102
Kingston upon Hull UADarlington UA
North TynesideSandw ellSheff ieldTamesideCoventry
New castle upon TyneBristol UARochdale
OldhamWolverhampton
Plymouth UAWalsallSalford
Gateshead
Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 88.60 91.10 94.11 96.36 97.45Metropolitan 91.80 92.70 95.02 96.41 97.18Family 88.90 89.30 95.57 96.12 97.32SALFORD 99.60 99.80 99.89 99.81 99.88
D40 – Clients receiving a review – Adult and older clients receiving a review as a percentage of those receiving a service.
l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l0<55 55<65 65<75 75+ - - - - -
Low High
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
WolverhamptonBristol UA
Plymouth UAKingston upon Hull
New castle upon TyneRochdale
GatesheadCoventryTameside
WalsallSalford
SheffieldOldham
Sandw ellNorth Tyneside
Darlington UA
Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 58.80 63.10 66.43 70.83 75.73Metropolitan 59.10 59.70 62.33 65.35 72.37Family 60.20 60.80 62.84 67.27 72.00SALFORD 38.00 34.50 66.19 66.00 72.85
D41 – Delayed Transfers of Care – The number of delayed transfers of care per 100,000 population aged 65 or over
l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l - - - - 0<20.12 20.12<39.78 39.78<73.28 73.28<106.48 106.48+
Low High
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
TamesideCoventry
Plymouth UAKingston upon Hull UA
WolverhamptonSandw ellSheffield
North TynesideWalsallSalford
GatesheadRochdaleBristol UA
New castle upon TyneOldham
Darlington UA Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 46.20 33.30 29.86 29.25 27.02Metropolitan 40.60 29.70 29.11 24.94 24.94Family 44.20 27.50 23.88 25.32 28.56SALFORD 30.40 15.30 14.05 16.60 25.00
D54 – % of items of equipment delivered within 7 working days – Percentage of items of equipment and adaptations delivered within 7 working days (BVPI 56) – Key Threshold
l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l0<55 55<65 65<75 75<85 85<=100 - - - -
Low High
80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 100
WalsallSandw ellBristol UA
Kingston upon Hull UAPlymouth UA
OldhamSheffield
WolverhamptonTameside
GatesheadDarlington UA
North TynesideSalford
RochdaleCoventry
New castle upon Tyne
Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 77.00 81.70 86.52 89.51 91.22Metropolitan 81.40 85.40 87.97 89.47 92.21Family 78.40 82.60 86.23 88.54 92.24SALFORD 87.70 91.30 94.83 97.32 96.11
D55 – Acceptable waiting times for 1 average of (I) the percentage where the time from first contact to beginning of assessment is less than or equal to 48 hours, and (ii) the percentage where the time from first contact to completion of assessment is less than or equal to four weeks. (BVPI 195) – Key Threshold
l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l0<70 70<80 80<85 85<90 90<=100
Low High
70 75 80 85 90 95 100
GatesheadNorth Tyneside
Sheff ieldOldham
WolverhamptonPlymouth UA
New castle upon TyneKingston upon Hull UA
SalfordWalsall
CoventryBristol UARochdaleSandw ell
Darlington UATameside
Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 61.50 71.70 78.75 84.16 87.45Metropolitan 62.80 67.10 75.77 81.16 84.86Family 60.40 69.90 79.25 83.07 86.59SALFORD 75.00 87.00 87.37 86.75 86.06
D56 – Acceptable waiting times for care packages – For new older clients, the percentage for whom the time from completion of assessment to provision of all services in the care package is less than or equal to 4 weeks. (BVPI 196) – Key Threshold
l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l0<70 70<80 80<85 85<90 90<=100
Low High
70 75 80 85 90 95 100
Sheffield
North Tyneside
Bristol UA
Coventry
Wolverhampton
Gateshead
Plymouth UA
Salford
Kingston upon Hull UA
Darlington UA
Walsall
Sandw ell
Oldham
New castle upon Tyne
Rochdale
Tameside
Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 81.40 84.00 87.27 89.29 90.94Metropolitan 83.10 84.60 88.06 88.09 89.90Family 79.50 82.50 87.02 88.29 90.20SALFORD 76.50 85.40 90.07 90.17 90.10
D83 – Improvement to quality of life from equipment/minor adaptations – For older service users all respondents to Q10 in the 2008 survey answering “it has
made it much better” or “it has made it a little better”
l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l - <75 75-82 >=82 - - - - -
89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100
CoventryWalsall
SheffieldSalford
TamesideNorth Tyneside
OldhamNew castle upon Tyne
GatesheadPlymouth UA
Sandw ellBristol UA
RochdaleKingston upon Hull UA
WolverhamptonDarlington UA
Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 95.17Metropolitan 94.66Family 95.46SALFORD 94.51
MRD75 – Practice learning – The number of assessed social work practice learning days per whole time equivalent social worker.
l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l0 (>0)<5 5<11 11<17 17+ - - - -
Low High
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0
TamesideNew castle upon Tyne
GatesheadOldham
RochdaleSheffield
WalsallNorth Tyneside
WolverhamptonSalford
Bristol UADarlington UA
Plymouth UASandw ell
CoventryKingston upon Hull UA
Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 15.95 17.72Metropolitan 15.97 17.59Family 17.88 18.40SALFORD 18.03 19.29
E47 – Ethnicity of older people receiving assessment – The percentage of older service users receiving an assessment or review that are from minority ethnic groups, divided by the percentage of older people in the local population that are from minority ethnic groups.
l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l - 0<1 1<2 - - - - 2+ -
Low High
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50
Kingston upon Hull UA
Darlington UA
Sheffield
New castle upon Tyne
Wolverhampton
Plymouth UA
Rochdale
Coventry
North Tyneside
Walsall
Salford
Sandw ell
Oldham
Tameside
Bristol UA
Gateshead
Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 1.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.35Metropolitan 1.00 1.10 1.12 1.34 1.35Family 0.80 0.90 1.09 1.13 1.25SALFORD 1.10 0.70 0.89 0.93 1.27
E48 – Ethnicity of older people receiving services following an assessment – The percentage of older service users receiving services following an assessment or review that are from a minority ethnic group, divided by the percentage of older service users assessed or reviewed that are from a minority ethnic group.
l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l- <0.9 0.9<1.1 - - - - 1.1+
Low High
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20
Plymouth UA
New castle upon Tyne
Tameside
Wolverhampton
Gateshead
North Tyneside
Salford
Sandw ell
Rochdale
Walsall
Kingston upon Hull UA
Bristol UA
Sheff ield
Oldham
Coventry
Darlington UA
Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00Metropolitan 0.90 1.00 0.87 0.96 0.96Family 1.10 1.10 0.88 0.96 0.97SALFORD 1.00 0.90 0.73 0.91 0.96
Darlington did not supply data for 3rd year
E82 – Assessments of adults and older people leading to provision of service – The percentage of assessments which lead to service being provided
l ll lll llll lllll llll lll ll l - <58 58<63 63<68 68<77 77<82 82<87 87+ -
Low High
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
New castle upon TyneOldham
WolverhamptonPlymouth UA
Gateshead
CoventryBristol UA
Darlington UASheffield
North TynesideTameside
Kingston upon Hull UASalford
Rochdale
Sandw ellWalsall
Average 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8England 69.57 71.6 75.22Metropolitan 66.06 70.90 73.39Family 69.35 70.61 76.25SALFORD 78.4 80.38 82.67