YOU ARE DOWNLOADING DOCUMENT

Please tick the box to continue:

Transcript
Page 1: Models of Neutrino Mass

Models of Neutrino Mass

G.G.Ross, IPPP December 2005

Origin of mass and mass hierarchy

What do we learn from the mixing angles?

Page 2: Models of Neutrino Mass

Origin of Neutrino masses

Dirac or Majorana?

Page 3: Models of Neutrino Mass

Origin of Neutrino masses

Dirac or Majorana?

0 2

0 0iji j ijij

f HH H M f

Weinberg 1979

0H 0H

RM

i j

( ) ( )A A

0H 0H

M

i j

( ) ( )D D

0H

i j

( ) ( )E F ( ) ( )B C

i j

0H

0H

(2) singletsLSU

0i iH l H 0 0[ ( ) 2 ]i i i iH H l H l H

i j i jl l [ ( ) 2 ]i j i j i j i jl l l l

0 01 2 1 2H H H H 0 0 0[ 2 ]H H H H H H

(2) tripletsLSU

(A)

(B)

(C)

(D)

(E)

(F)

0H

Page 4: Models of Neutrino Mass

0 2

0 0iji j ijij

f HH H M f

Weinberg 1979

0 2

i

R

Hm

M

2013

210

10R

Hm GeV

GeV

(2) singletsLSU

0i iH l H 0 0[ ( ) 2 ]i i i iH H l H l H

i j i jl l [ ( ) 2 ]i j i j i j i jl l l l

0 01 2 1 2H H H H 0 0 0[ 2 ]H H H H H H

(2) tripletsLSU

(A)

(B)

(C)

(D)

(E)

(F)

0H 0H

RM

i j

( ) ( )A A

Minkowski mechanism

Origin of Neutrino masses

Dirac or Majorana?

Page 5: Models of Neutrino Mass

0 2

0 0iji j ijij

f HH H M f

Weinberg 1979

M

i j

( ) ( )A A

0 2

i

R

Hm

M

2013

210

10R

Hm GeV

GeV

2

i

N

mM

2

3

110N GeV

MeM

V

/PRSUSYPRSUSY

(2) singletsLSU

0i iH l H 0 0[ ( ) 2 ]i i i iH H l H l H

i j i jl l [ ( ) 2 ]i j i j i j i jl l l l

0 01 2 1 2H H H H 0 0 0[ 2 ]H H H H H H

(2) tripletsLSU

(A)

(B)

(C)

(D)

(E)

(F)

Origin of Neutrino masses

Dirac or Majorana?

Page 6: Models of Neutrino Mass

New space dimensions

Closed string 11D propagation

Graviton, Modulini

Open string

SM states

Right-handed in the bulks

4 ( ) ( ) ( , 0)L Rd x x H x x y }

*

/1,2

( ) iny RR nRM

n

x e

Flux spreading

* *4.10Planck

HM TeV

M Mm eV

Arkani Hamed, Dimopoulos, March RussellDienes,Farragi

In 4D small Dirac masses can arise through higher dimension operators * *

*( , ) '( , ). . u d

F Fe g K LH N LH N

M M

Abel, Dedes, Tamvakis3/ 2 16 7, 10 10Mm

eVH GmM

Dirac or Majorana? 12, ?: 10L Rh H m h H h

Page 7: Models of Neutrino Mass

Neutrino mass and dark energy

3 4(3.10 ) neutrino sectorDE eV

Quintessence field3310m eV

Symmetry needed to keep it light

CP violating field of neutrino mass matrix? Barbieri, Hall, Oliver, Strumia

Mass varying neutrinos

0( ) ( ), ( )V m m n V m m f A

. . . 1DM

E OM

energy in A

22

0 0( ) ( ) ( )DD L L

mm N ANN V A V A see saw

A

L

At finite density :

2

0( ) ( )Deff

mV m n V A

A

Neutrino density dependent term

4 At false minimum 0, DA V m

At true minimum 0, 0 ( )A V fine tuned

drives 0A

Fardon, Nelson, Weiner

Page 8: Models of Neutrino Mass

spontaneously broken family symmetry - mass matrix elements ordered : by

n

L RH M

spatial separ n atio

Yijk hqu n H2

DM , a a,ijk

dn e

Aijk n

2 e 2 i ijkn. #

Froggatt-Nielsen

Origin of mass structure

… dimension of operator

… order of radiative corrections2 2( /16 )nh

Hierarchy

Structure

Can get normal, inverted or degenerate structures

(NB Radiative corrections can split precise degeneracies unless protected by symmetry)

Page 9: Models of Neutrino Mass

Unravelling the origin of mass…..

…difficult (impossible) unless we are lucky!

?Q L

100

10-1

10

10-2

10-3

10-4

eV

Mixing

0.72 0.89 0.45 0.69 0.2

0.24 0.58 0.39 0.76 0.52 0.84

0.24 0.58 0.39 0.76 0.53 0.84MNSV

2 13 3

1 1 16 3 2

1 1 16 3 2

0

Bi-Tri Maximal Mixing …

Harrison, Perkins, Scottansatz

Non AbelianStructure?

Many possibilities, many parameters…

Small in quark sector, large in lepton sector?

1 0.218 0.224 0.002 0.005

0.218 0.224 1 0.032 0.048

0.004 0.015 0.03 0.048 1CKMV

Page 10: Models of Neutrino Mass

23 23 123 123i j i j

i j i ja b effL

23

0

1

1

123

1

1

1

3 3 ...l i c ji ja L

3

0

0

1

0 0

3

i i

23 123

45 35

SU(3) SU(2) ..

SU(

3) SU(2)' ..

q , l

i

???

Tri-Bi-Maximal mixing

Page 11: Models of Neutrino Mass

Discrete non Abelian family symmetry

2. . ( ) :Ze g i e d d

M d a b

d b a

1

2

3

0 0

0 0

0 0

T

m

U M U m

m

cos sin 0

sin / 2 cos / 2 1/ 2

sin / 2 cos / 2 1/ 2

U

Bi-maximal

23 12 13/ 4, , 0

But what about the charged lepton sector ??

Need complete theory…

Page 12: Models of Neutrino Mass

“See-saw” with sequential domination1

MT

D DM MM M

1

3 1

3

2 1 2 3 suppresses contributio nMM M

M

M

M M M M

SRHD King

Two ingredients :

(Discrete) Non-Abelian family symmetry

3 3 23 23 123 123l i c j i c j i c j

i j i j i j L

2 2

23 23 123

2

3 1231

3 32

( )i j i ji j i j

i ji jM M M

effL

small

23

0

1

1

123

1

1

1

3

0

0

1

Vacuum alignment

King, GGR, Varzielas

Page 13: Models of Neutrino Mass

Vacuum alignment Altarelli,Feruglio

1 2 32 3i ii

M gP

1 2 3 2 1 3 3 1 21 2 3

0, 0, 0P P P

M g M g M g

(v,v,v), vM

g

2 3 4(12) ( , )Z Z A

2 3 1 3 1 21 2 3

' ' 0, ' ' 0, ' ' 0' ' '

P P Pg g g

' (v',0,0), v' driven by soft terms

1 2 3

'' ' ' '

3

gP

King,GGR,Varzielas

Page 14: Models of Neutrino Mass

Summary

Origin of mass and mass hierarchy

- Many possibilities for both Majorana and Dirac masses :

Heavy see-saw, light see-saw, bare Dirac, radiative generation, radiative running, running masses…dark energy

- All patterns of mass possible :

normal, inverted, degenerate

What do we learn from the mixing angles?

-Hints at an underlying (spontaneously broken) family symmetry?

SO(10)XSU(3)? Unified theory of quark, charged lepton and neutrino masses with related textures

Page 15: Models of Neutrino Mass

(10) (3) familySO SU G

3 23 123 45, , ,i i i H

, No mass while SU(3) unbrok3 e16, nci i

Spontaneous symmetry breaking

(1,3) (1,3) (1,3) 45,1

2

0 0 1

0 1 1

1 1 1

M M M

c.f. Georgi-Jarskog

(4) (2) (2)L RSU SU SU

3 3 23 23 45 23 123 123 232 3 2 2

1 1 1 1i j c i j c i j c i j cY i j i j i j i jP H HH H H

M M M M

only terms allowed by G

I de Medeiros, GGRKing, Vives, Velasco Sevilla…

(1) (1) 'G R U U

D

3

3 4 3 4

3 4 2 3 2 3

3 4 2 3

Mm

0

1

a a

a

Common texture zero

Page 16: Models of Neutrino Mass

Summary

Origin of mass and mass hierarchy

- Many possibilities for both Majorana and Dirac masses :

Heavy see-saw, light see-saw, bare Dirac, radiative generation, radiative running, running masses…dark energy

- All patterns of mass possible :

normal, inverted, degenerate

What do we learn from the mixing angles?

-Hints at an underlying (spontaneously broken) family symmetry?

SO(10)XSU(3)? Unified theory of quark, charged lepton and neutrino masses with related textures

- A discrete non-Abelian subgroup can give vacuum alignment neededfor bi-tri-maximal mixing


Related Documents