Market ReformProgramme Office
Market Reform: 2006 progress
21 December 2006
Andy Brookes
Mark
et
Refo
rmD
ec 0
6 as
sess
men
t
Contract Certainty
MRG Objectives 2006 +
Mark
et
Refo
rmD
ec 0
6 as
sess
men
t
Contract Certainty
• Market achievement of monthly volume of certain contracts (30% by Q4 05, 60% by Q2, 85% by Q4)
MRG Objectives 2006 +
Overall CC score 92% in
September
Mark
et
Refo
rmD
ec 0
6 as
sess
men
t
Contract Certainty
• Market achievement of monthly volume of certain contracts (30% by Q4 05, 60% by Q2, 85% by Q4)
• Market slip compliance rated 99% (Q1);
MRG Objectives 2006 +
98% achievedOverall CC score 92% in
September
Mark
et
Refo
rmD
ec 0
6 as
sess
men
t
Contract Certainty
• Market achievement of monthly volume of certain contracts (30% by Q4 05, 60% by Q2, 85% by Q4)
• Market slip compliance rated 99% (Q1); 85% of slips fully compliant (Q4)
MRG Objectives 2006 +
98% achievedOverall CC score 92% in
September
Superseded by CC
measurement
Mark
et
Refo
rmD
ec 0
6 as
sess
men
t
Contract Certainty
• Market achievement of monthly volume of certain contracts (30% by Q4 05, 60% by Q2, 85% by Q4)
• Market slip compliance rated 99% (Q1); 85% of slips fully compliant (Q4)
• Resolve signed lines, late orders and other outstanding contract certainty issues (Q2)
MRG Objectives 2006 +
98% achieved
Overall CC score 92% in September
Superseded by CC
measurement
Mark
et
Refo
rmD
ec 0
6 as
sess
men
t
Contract Certainty
• Market achievement of monthly volume of certain contracts (30% by Q4 05, 60% by Q2, 85% by Q4)
• Market slip compliance rated 99% (Q1); 85% of slips fully compliant (Q4)
• Resolve signed lines, late orders and other outstanding contract certainty issues (Q2)
• Clear plan for continued improvement of CC in 2007+ (Q3)
MRG Objectives 2006 +
98% achieved
Overall CC score 92% in September
Shared with the FSA
Superseded by CC
measurement
Mark
et
Refo
rmD
ec 0
6 as
sess
men
t
Contract Certainty
• Market achievement of monthly volume of certain contracts (30% by Q4 05, 60% by Q2, 85% by Q4)
• Market slip compliance rated 99% (Q1); 85% of slips fully compliant (Q4)
• Resolve signed lines, late orders and other outstanding contract certainty issues (Q2)
• Clear plan for continued improvement of CC in 2007+ (Q3)
• Avoid regulatory intervention
MRG Objectives 2006 +
98% achieved
So far…
Overall CC score 92% in September
Shared with the FSA
Superseded by CC
measurement
Mark
et
Refo
rmD
ec 0
6 as
sess
men
t
Contract Certainty
• Market achievement of monthly volume of certain contracts (30% by Q4 05, 60% by Q2, 85% by Q4)
• Market slip compliance rated 99% (Q1); 85% of slips fully compliant (Q4)
• Resolve signed lines, late orders and other outstanding contract certainty issues (Q2)
• Clear plan for continued improvement of CC in 2007+ (Q3)
• Avoid regulatory intervention
• Build user-friendly front-end for contract certainty checks (Q1)
MRG Objectives 2006 +
98% achieved
So far…
Overall CC score 92% in September
Shared with the FSA
QA tools also streamlined for Lloyd’s Contract Documentation Pilot and for Binding Authorities
Superseded by CC
measurement
Mark
et
Refo
rmD
ec 0
6 as
sess
men
t
Contract Certainty
• Market achievement of monthly volume of certain contracts (30% by Q4 05, 60% by Q2, 85% by Q4)
• Market slip compliance rated 99% (Q1); 85% of slips fully compliant (Q4)
• Resolve signed lines, late orders and other outstanding contract certainty issues (Q2)
• Clear plan for continued improvement of CC in 2007+ (Q3)
• Avoid regulatory intervention
• Build user-friendly front-end for contract certainty checks (Q1)
• Market feasibility for next stage of development of QA tools (Q4)
MRG Objectives 2006 +
98% achieved
So far…
Overall CC score 92% in September
Shared with the FSA
QA tools also streamlined for Lloyd’s Contract Documentation Pilot and for Binding Authorities
Further enhancements scheduled for Lloyd’s market next year
Superseded by CC
measurement
Mark
et
Refo
rmD
ec 0
6 as
sess
men
tContract Certainty
What else is happening and what should be live issues for your firm?
• Industry Assessment of Success
–8th and 25th January with FSA
• MR Slip Guidance
–Orders Hereon, Document Production, Fiscal & Regulatory, NCAD.…
• Stamp Conditions
– guidance forthcoming
• Legacy
Mark
et
Refo
rmD
ec 0
6 as
sess
men
tMRG Objectives 2006 +
Accounting & Settlement
Mark
et
Refo
rmD
ec 0
6 as
sess
men
tMRG Objectives 2006 +
Accounting & Settlement
• Establish measurement regime (Q1);
Some statistics available from end October
Mark
et
Refo
rmD
ec 0
6 as
sess
men
tMRG Objectives 2006 +
Accounting & Settlement
• Establish measurement regime (Q1); publish accounting checks (Q1)
Achieved, but lateSome statistics available
from end October
Mark
et
Refo
rmD
ec 0
6 as
sess
men
tMRG Objectives 2006 +
Accounting & Settlement
• Establish measurement regime (Q1); publish accounting checks (Q1)
• For ACORD international standard A&S processes:
Achieved, but lateSome statistics available
from end October
Mark
et
Refo
rmD
ec 0
6 as
sess
men
tMRG Objectives 2006 +
Accounting & Settlement
• Establish measurement regime (Q1); publish accounting checks (Q1)
• For ACORD international standard A&S processes:
– Agree and document outline processes (Q1)
Achieved, but lateSome statistics available
from end October
Mark
et
Refo
rmD
ec 0
6 as
sess
men
tMRG Objectives 2006 +
Accounting & Settlement
• Establish measurement regime (Q1); publish accounting checks (Q1)
• For ACORD international standard A&S processes:
– Agree and document outline processes (Q1)
– Publish detailed technical and business information (Q2)
Consolidated and
completed in October
Achieved, but lateSome statistics available
from end October
Mark
et
Refo
rmD
ec 0
6 as
sess
men
tMRG Objectives 2006 +
Accounting & Settlement
• Establish measurement regime (Q1); publish accounting checks (Q1)
• For ACORD international standard A&S processes:
– Agree and document outline processes (Q1)
– Publish detailed technical and business information (Q2)
– Secure public commitment to implementation by brokers and carriers; with timetable for migration from old processes (Q4)
Consolidated and
completed in October
Achieved, but lateSome statistics available
from end October
MRG reprioritisation.
Insufficient demand from market
Mark
et
Refo
rmD
ec 0
6 as
sess
men
tMRG Objectives 2006 +
Accounting & Settlement
• Establish measurement regime (Q1); publish accounting checks (Q1)
• For ACORD international standard A&S processes:
– Agree and document outline processes (Q1)
– Publish detailed technical and business information (Q2)
– Secure public commitment to implementation by brokers and carriers; with timetable for migration from old processes (Q4)
• Implement A&S repository (Q4)
Consolidated and
completed in October
Achieved, but lateSome statistics available
from end October
Email and Direct Load live Sept
MRG reprioritisation.
Insufficient demand from market
DRI live December
Mark
et
Refo
rmD
ec 0
6 as
sess
men
tAccounting & Settlement
What else is happening and what should be live issues for your firm?
• Repository
–Take up
– Pricing
– Further phases in 2007
• Measurement and ‘right first time’
• Strategy
–Speak to Rob Campbell (MRPO)
Mark
et
Refo
rmD
ec 0
6 as
sess
men
tClaimsInfrastructure
MRG Objectives 2006 +
Mark
et
Refo
rmD
ec 0
6 as
sess
men
tClaimsInfrastructure
• Publish processes and procedures for electronic claims – Lloyd’s first (Q1);
MRG Objectives 2006 +
Mark
et
Refo
rmD
ec 0
6 as
sess
men
tClaimsInfrastructure
• Publish processes and procedures for electronic claims – Lloyd’s first (Q1); IUA next (Q4)
MRG Objectives 2006 +
Rescheduled for Q1, 2007
Mark
et
Refo
rmD
ec 0
6 as
sess
men
tClaimsInfrastructure
• Publish processes and procedures for electronic claims – Lloyd’s first (Q1); IUA next (Q4)
• Publish implementation manual for electronic transfer of documents using (ACORD DRI) international standards (Q1)
MRG Objectives 2006 +
Rescheduled for Q1, 2007
Mark
et
Refo
rmD
ec 0
6 as
sess
men
tClaimsInfrastructure
• Publish processes and procedures for electronic claims – Lloyd’s first (Q1); IUA next (Q4)
• Publish implementation manual for electronic transfer of documents using (ACORD DRI) international standards (Q1)
• Plan for common claims procedure in London (Q1)
MRG Objectives 2006 +
Reviewed in A&S strategy work, no plans to progress
Rescheduled for Q1, 2007
Mark
et
Refo
rmD
ec 0
6 as
sess
men
tClaimsInfrastructure
• Publish processes and procedures for electronic claims – Lloyd’s first (Q1); IUA next (Q4)
• Publish implementation manual for electronic transfer of documents using (ACORD DRI) international standards (Q1)
• Plan for common claims procedure in London (Q1)
• Complete IUA repository pilot and agree next steps (Q2)
MRG Objectives 2006 +
Reviewed in A&S strategy work, no plans to progress
Started June, extended into 2007
Rescheduled for Q1, 2007
Mark
et
Refo
rmD
ec 0
6 as
sess
men
tClaimsInfrastructure
• Publish processes and procedures for electronic claims – Lloyd’s first (Q1); IUA next (Q4)
• Publish implementation manual for electronic transfer of documents using (ACORD DRI) international standards (Q1)
• Plan for common claims procedure in London (Q1)
• Complete IUA repository pilot and agree next steps (Q2)
• Deliver Lloyd's electronic infrastructure into market testing (Q2)
MRG Objectives 2006 +
Reviewed in A&S strategy work, no plans to progress
Started June, extended into 2007
Live Now
Rescheduled for Q1, 2007
Mark
et
Refo
rmD
ec 0
6 as
sess
men
tClaimsInfrastructure
• Publish processes and procedures for electronic claims – Lloyd’s first (Q1); IUA next (Q4)
• Publish implementation manual for electronic transfer of documents using (ACORD DRI) international standards (Q1)
• Plan for common claims procedure in London (Q1)
• Complete IUA repository pilot and agree next steps (Q2)
• Deliver Lloyd's electronic infrastructure into market testing (Q2)
• (At least 4) brokers and (9) Lloyd’s Managing Agents processing 100% of new claims electronically, supported by XCS (Q4)
MRG Objectives 2006 +
Reviewed in A&S strategy work, no plans to progress
Started June, extended into 2007
Live Now
Small but increasing numbers of wholly electronic claims processed: 31 MAs, 24 brokers & XCS committed to use
Rescheduled for Q1, 2007
Mark
et
Refo
rmD
ec 0
6 as
sess
men
tClaimsInfrastructure
• Publish processes and procedures for electronic claims – Lloyd’s first (Q1); IUA next (Q4)
• Publish implementation manual for electronic transfer of documents using (ACORD DRI) international standards (Q1)
• Plan for common claims procedure in London (Q1)
• Complete IUA repository pilot and agree next steps (Q2)
• Deliver Lloyd's electronic infrastructure into market testing (Q2)
• (At least 4) brokers and (9) Lloyd’s Managing Agents processing 100% of new claims electronically, supported by XCS (Q4)
• Set strategy for claims infrastructure beyond ECF (Q4)
MRG Objectives 2006 +
Reviewed in A&S strategy work, no plans to progress
Started June, extended into 2007
Live Now
Small but increasing numbers of wholly electronic claims processed: 31 MAs, 24 brokers & XCS committed to use
Reviewed in A&S strategy work, ECF upgrades in MRG plans for 2007
Rescheduled for Q1, 2007
Mark
et
Refo
rmD
ec 0
6 as
sess
men
tClaims Infrastructure
What else is happening and what should be live issues for your firm?
• Repository
–Take up
–Pricing
–Further phases in 2007
Mark
et
Refo
rmD
ec 0
6 as
sess
men
t
Other
MRG Objectives 2006 +
Mark
et
Refo
rmD
ec 0
6 as
sess
men
t
Other • Publish legacy Code of Practice (Q1);
MRG Objectives 2006 +
Mark
et
Refo
rmD
ec 0
6 as
sess
men
t
Other • Publish legacy Code of Practice (Q1); measured progress against code (Q4)
MRG Objectives 2006 +
Need to demonstrate significant legacy reduction in 2007
Mark
et
Refo
rmD
ec 0
6 as
sess
men
t
Other • Publish legacy Code of Practice (Q1); measured progress against code (Q4)
• Measure use of new infrastructure and business benefits (on-going)
MRG Objectives 2006 +
Need to demonstrate significant legacy reduction in 2007
Mark
et
Refo
rmD
ec 0
6 as
sess
men
t
Other • Publish legacy Code of Practice (Q1); measured progress against code (Q4)
• Measure use of new infrastructure and business benefits (on-going)
• Training: ‘approved’ courses for contract certainty (Q1);
MRG Objectives 2006 +
Need to demonstrate significant legacy reduction in 2007
Mark
et
Refo
rmD
ec 0
6 as
sess
men
t
Other • Publish legacy Code of Practice (Q1); measured progress against code (Q4)
• Measure use of new infrastructure and business benefits (on-going)
• Training: ‘approved’ courses for contract certainty (Q1); framework for claims training (Q2);
MRG Objectives 2006 +
Need to demonstrate significant legacy reduction in 2007
Mark
et
Refo
rmD
ec 0
6 as
sess
men
t
Other • Publish legacy Code of Practice (Q1); measured progress against code (Q4)
• Measure use of new infrastructure and business benefits (on-going)
• Training: ‘approved’ courses for contract certainty (Q1); framework for claims training (Q2); participation targets (Q4)
MRG Objectives 2006 +
None set, training as required by firms
Need to demonstrate significant legacy reduction in 2007
Mark
et
Refo
rmD
ec 0
6 as
sess
men
t
Other
In Addition
• Publish legacy Code of Practice (Q1); measured progress against code (Q4)
• Measure use of new infrastructure and business benefits (on-going)
• Training: ‘approved’ courses for contract certainty (Q1); framework for claims training (Q2); participation targets (Q4)
MRG Objectives 2006 +
None set, training as required by firms
Need to demonstrate significant legacy reduction in 2007
Mark
et
Refo
rmD
ec 0
6 as
sess
men
t
Other
In Addition
• Publish legacy Code of Practice (Q1); measured progress against code (Q4)
• Measure use of new infrastructure and business benefits (on-going)
• Training: ‘approved’ courses for contract certainty (Q1); framework for claims training (Q2); participation targets (Q4)
• Schematron
MRG Objectives 2006 +
None set, training as required by firms
Tool to ensure right ACORD are messages sent
Need to demonstrate significant legacy reduction in 2007
Mark
et
Refo
rmD
ec 0
6 as
sess
men
tCommunications
Questions