7/28/2019 Linda Chavez Motion for Declaratory Injunction
1/17
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO DIVISION
LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN
CITIZENS, INC. (LULAC) Plaintiff,
v. Civil Number EP:12-cv-0296-FM ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED
TEXAS LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, LINDA CHAVEZ, Individually, BEA MARTINEZ, Individually,
and JOEY CARDENAS, Individually Defendants,
DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT,
RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT, AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
COMES NOW DEFENDANTS FLORINDA CHAVEZ, INDIVIDUALLY, BEATRICE
MARTINEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND JOE CARDENAS, III INDIVIDUALLY, by and through
their undersigned attorneys of record, and, in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
57, 60, and 65 file this, their Motion for Declaratory Judgment, Relief From Judgment and
Preliminary Injunction. For cause of action, Defendants would show unto the Court the
following:
I.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
1. The underlying dispute involved federal and state law trademark claims made by
the Plaintiff against Defendants. Plaintiffs basic claim was that Defendants had created a
separate entity (Texas League of United Latin American Citizens) that allegedly caused a
likelihood of confusion with Plaintiff.
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 28 Filed 06/07/13 Page 1 of 6
7/28/2019 Linda Chavez Motion for Declaratory Injunction
2/17
2
2. On or about December 19, 2012, the Parties entered into an Agreed Judgment in
which Defendants agreed to abandon the use of the defunct non-profit corporation, abandon any
fundraising efforts on behalf of the defunct non-profit corporation, and abandon identifying
themselves as officers of the defunct non-profit corporation. In all respects, Defendants
maintained the good-faith belief that their dispute with Plaintiff had been resolved without any
lingering disagreements or controversies.
3. On or about March 2, 2013 and after the underlying dispute was ostensibly
resolved, Florinda Chavez declared her candidacy for State Director of LULAC. For the next
three months, Florinda Chavez electioneered her candidacy through an extensive e-mail andpublic relations campaign to other members of LULAC. At no point during her candidacy did
anyone advise or inform Florinda Chavez that she was, in any way, ineligible to serve as an
officer for LULAC.
4. On or about June 2, 2013 at the Texas State LULAC Convention and at the very
moment that LULAC membership were set to vote for the State Director, Ms. Chavez was
declared to be ineligible for State Director by Mr. Roger Rocha, the National Treasurer of
LULAC. Before an auditorium full of LULAC convention delegates, Mr. Rocha stated that the
Honorable Frank Montalvo had rendered a Final Judgment declaring that Ms. Chavez was
disqualified from holding any elected office within the LULAC organization.1 The LULAC
Legal Advisor, Miguel Ortiz, also used this Courts Final Judgment to wrongly exclude Ms.
Chavez from seeking or holding elected office.
1See Exhibit 1, CD containing video segment of Ms. Chavezs disqualification at the LULAC convention, datedJune 2, 2013.
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 28 Filed 06/07/13 Page 2 of 6
7/28/2019 Linda Chavez Motion for Declaratory Injunction
3/17
3
5. Upon information and belief, Luis Vera, Esq., General Counsel for LULAC and
Plaintiffs counsel, aided and abetted Mr. Rochas and Mr. Ortizs fraudulent misrepresentation
by urging and/or soliciting the wrongful disqualification of Ms. Chavezs candidacy.
6. Defendants Beatrice Martinez and Joe Cardenas have also been prejudiced in that,
through the fraudulent misrepresentations and improper use of the Final Judgment, they were
denied the opportunity to support and cast ballots in favor of Ms. Chavez, the candidate of their
choice. Mr. Cardenas and Ms. Martinez are also, according to the misuse of the Final Judgment,
barred from office.
II.ARGUMENT & AUTHORITIES
A. Request for Declaratory Judgment7. Pursuant to Rule 57 and the Declaratory Judgment Act, Defendants contend that a
substantial controversy exists between the Parties herein and that said Parties maintain adverse
legal interests of sufficient immediacy and reality to warrant the issuance of a declaratory
judgment.2 The Fifth Circuit has held that a court may issue a declaratory judgment to establish
the existing rights, status, or other legal relationships of parties.3 This Court has jurisdiction to
adjudicate the existing right of the Parties because it entered the Final Judgment that is currently
being misconstrued by Plaintiffs agents and representatives.
8. In the present dispute, Defendants aver that Plaintiff, through its agents and
representatives, are distorting the Final Judgment rendered by this Court for an improper
purpose. More specifically, Defendants contend that Plaintiff, through its agents and
representatives, has, in the past and in the present, wrongly claimed that this Court disqualified
2See FED.R.CIV.P. 57; see also Golden v. Zwickler, 394 U.S. 103, 108 (1969).3 See Brister v. Faulkner, 214 F.3d 675, 68 (5th Cir. 2000).
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 28 Filed 06/07/13 Page 3 of 6
7/28/2019 Linda Chavez Motion for Declaratory Injunction
4/17
4
Ms. Chavez from declaring her candidacy or holding elected office within the LULAC
organization.
9. Defendants seek a speedy hearing on their request for declaratory relief.
Defendants seek reasonable and necessary attorneys fees and taxable costs of court as provided
by Rule 57 and the Declaratory Judgment Act.
B. Request for Relief From Judgment10. Pleading in the main and in the alternative, Defendants submit their Motion for
Relief From Judgment pursuant to Rule 60.4 Rule 60 allows a party to seek relief from a
judgment or order based upon, inter alia, fraud, misrepresentation, and misconduct; or asatisfied, released, or discharged judgment; because applying a judgment prospectively is no
longer equitable; or for any other reason that justifies relief. Defendants aver that Plaintiff has
engaged in fraud, misrepresentation and misconduct by misusing the Final Judgment for an
improper purpose for which Defendants never agreed. Defendants further aver that the they have
complied with all the terms and conditions of the Final Judgment and that it has been satisfied,
released and/or discharged such that it cannot be used for any further purpose including to
disqualify Defendants from actively participating in LULAC elections either as a candidate or a
voter. Defendants aver that application of the Final Judgment for any future purpose is no longer
equitable. Finally, as Defendants contend that their predicament justifies relief.
C. Request for Preliminary Injunction
11. Due to the actions of Plaintiff, Defendants request that the Court issue a
Preliminary Injunction pursuant to Rule 65 to prevent Plaintiff from disqualifying the Defendants
for an elected office or position within LULAC.
4 See FED.R.CIV.P. 60; see Agostini v. Felton, 521 U.S. 203, 215 (1997).
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 28 Filed 06/07/13 Page 4 of 6
7/28/2019 Linda Chavez Motion for Declaratory Injunction
5/17
5
Defendants have annexed to this motion their sworn affidavits and other evidence
showing by clear and convincing evidence that they have suffered immediate prejudice because
of Plaintiffs actions. These Affidavits are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.5
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, DEFENDANTS FLORINDA CHAVEZ,
INDIVIDUALLY, BEATRICE MARTINEZ, INDIVIDUALLY and JOE CARDENAS, III
INDIVIDUALLY, respectfully pray that the Court grant their requested relief, either at law or in
equity, to which they may show themselves to be justly entitled.
Respectfully submitted,
GALE, WILSON & SNCHEZ, P.L.L.C.ROBERT W. WILSON, ESQ.MARK ANTHONY SNCHEZ, ESQ.115 East Travis Street, 19th FloorSan Antonio, Texas 78205Telephone: (210) 222-8899Telecopier: (210) 222-9256ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS
By: /s/ ROBERT W.WILSONROBERT W. WILSON, ESQ.TEXAS STATE BAR NO. 00794868MARK ANTHONY SNCHEZ, ESQ.TEXAS STATE BAR NO. 00795857
NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING
The undersigned counsel hereby certifies that he has electronically submitted for filing atrue and correct copy of the above and foregoing in accordance with the Electronic Case FilesSystem of the Western District of Texas on the 7th day of June, 2013.
By: /S/ROBERT W.WILSONROBERT W. WILSON, ESQ.
5See Exhibit 2, Affidavit of Florinda Chavez, dated June 6, 2013; See Exhibit 3, Affidavit of Beatrice Martinez,dated June 6, 2013; and Exhibit 4, Affidavit of Joe Cardenas, III, dated June 7, 2013.
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 28 Filed 06/07/13 Page 5 of 6
7/28/2019 Linda Chavez Motion for Declaratory Injunction
6/17
6
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document has beenprovided to counsel for Plaintiffs on this the 7th day of June, 2013, as follows:
Mr. Luis Roberto Vera, Jr. [ ] First Class MailThe Law Offices of Luis Roberto Vera, Jr. [ XX ] Facsimile; 210-225-2060111 Soledad, Suite 1325 [ ] CM,RRRSan Antonio, Texas 78205 [ XX ] E-Mail [email protected]
Mr. Ray Velarde [ ] First Class MailAttorney at Law [ XX ] Facsimile; 915-542-23411216 Montana Ave. [ ] CM,RRREl Paso, Texas 79902 [ XX ] E-Mail [email protected]
Mr. Manuel G. Escobar, Jr. [ ] First Class MailAttorney at Law [ XX ] Facsimile; 210-212-5653201 West Poplar [ ] CM,RRRSan Antonio, Texas 78212 [ XX ] E-Mail [email protected]
By: /S/ROBERT W.WILSONROBERT S. WILSON
G:\My Files\1-Sanchez\Texas LULAC\LULAC v. TXLULAC\Pleadings\Motion - Reconsideration.doc
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 28 Filed 06/07/13 Page 6 of 6
7/28/2019 Linda Chavez Motion for Declaratory Injunction
7/17
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 28-1 Filed 06/07/13 Page 1 of 1
** The actual CD will be filed with the Court.
7/28/2019 Linda Chavez Motion for Declaratory Injunction
8/17
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 28-2 Filed 06/07/13 Page 1 of 4
7/28/2019 Linda Chavez Motion for Declaratory Injunction
9/17
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 28-2 Filed 06/07/13 Page 2 of 4
7/28/2019 Linda Chavez Motion for Declaratory Injunction
10/17
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 28-2 Filed 06/07/13 Page 3 of 4
7/28/2019 Linda Chavez Motion for Declaratory Injunction
11/17
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 28-2 Filed 06/07/13 Page 4 of 4
7/28/2019 Linda Chavez Motion for Declaratory Injunction
12/17
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 28-3 Filed 06/07/13 Page 1 of 3
7/28/2019 Linda Chavez Motion for Declaratory Injunction
13/17
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 28-3 Filed 06/07/13 Page 2 of 3
7/28/2019 Linda Chavez Motion for Declaratory Injunction
14/17
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 28-3 Filed 06/07/13 Page 3 of 3
7/28/2019 Linda Chavez Motion for Declaratory Injunction
15/17
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 28-4 Filed 06/07/13 Page 1 of 3
7/28/2019 Linda Chavez Motion for Declaratory Injunction
16/17
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 28-4 Filed 06/07/13 Page 2 of 3
7/28/2019 Linda Chavez Motion for Declaratory Injunction
17/17
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 28-4 Filed 06/07/13 Page 3 of 3