||
Last week:
Brief revisit of the dispersive limit Parametric amplifiers Qubit spectroscopy
Qubit-Qubit coupling in circuit QED 2-qubit gates by virtual photon interaction The controlled NOT gate
This week:
Qubit-Qubit coupling in circuit QED Characterizing 2-qubit gates Creating entangled states
State transfer and remote entanglement State of the art Challenges
29-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 207
Lecture 6, March 29, 2018
||
Reading: BooksHaroche, S. & Raimond, J.-M.; Exploring the Quantum: Atoms, Cavities, and Photons, Oxford University Press, New York, USA, (2006)
29-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 208
Nielsen, M. A. & Chuang, I. L. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, Cambridge University Press (2000)
Gerry, C. & Knight, P. L. Introductory Quantum Optics, Cambridge University Press (2005)
||
Reading: Papers, Reviews, Other Material
29-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 209
Read (some of) the research papers mentioned on the slides.
• First read abstract and discussion/summary• Try to understand essence of the paper reading
it once, not caring for the details• Don’t be put off by not understanding
everything immediately• Read a different paper to get another authors
view of the same subject• Research you will do in the lab (Semester
Thesis, Master Thesis) aims at going beyond (all of) the papers that you read in preparation.
E.g.:A. Blais, et al., PRA 69, 062320 (2004)
Quantum Machines: Measurement and Control of Engineered Quantum Systems: Lecture Notes of the Les Houches Summer School: Volume 96, July 2011chapters: (link on QIP II web site)• 3 Circuit QED: superconducting qubits coupled to
microwave photons S. M. Girvin Department of Physics, Yale University
• 4 Quantum logic gates in superconducting qubitsJ. M. Martinis Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93111, USA
• 6 Readout of superconducting qubitsD. Esteve Quantronics Group Service de Physique de l’Etat Condensé/IRAMIS/DSM (CNRS URA 2464) CEA Saclay
ETH Zurich, TU Delft, (Imperial College), RWTH Aachen IDEA league summer school series.Lectures slides, videos, homework sets: http://www.qei.ethz.ch/education/IDEA-School.htmlhttp://qischoolsidea.wikispaces.com/home
||
for Implementing a quantum computer in the standard (circuit approach) to quantum information processing (QIP):
#1. A scalable physical system with well-characterized qubits.#2. The ability to initialize the state of the qubits.#3. Long (relative) decoherence times, much longer than the gate-operation time.#4. A universal set of quantum gates.#5. A qubit-specific measurement capability.
plus two criteria requiring the possibility to transmit information:
#6. The ability to interconvert stationary and mobile (or flying) qubits.#7. The ability to faithfully transmit mobile qubits between specified locations.
29-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 210
The DiVincenzo Criteria
David P. DiVincenzo, The Physical Implementation of Quantum Computation, arXiv:quant-ph/0002077 (2000)
||
4 Qubit Device with Nearest Neighbor Resonator-Mediated Coupling
Salathé et al., PRX 5, 021027 (2015)
four qubitsfour resonators→ mediate couplingtwo readout linesfour microwave drive linesfour flux bias lines
→ tune qubit transition
1 mm29-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 211
||
Universal Two-Qubit Non-Adiabatic Controlled Phase Gate (11-20)
proposal: F. W. Strauch et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 167005 (2003).first implementation: L. DiCarlo et al., Nature 460, 240 (2010).
Interaction mediated by virtual photon exchange
through resonator
Tune levels into resonance using magnetic field
Full 2π rotation induces phase factor -1
29-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 212
Make use of qubit states beyond 0, 1
|qubit A, qubit B>
||
Universal Two-Qubit Controlled Phase Gate
proposal: F. W. Strauch et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 167005 (2003).first implementation: L. DiCarlo et al., Nature 460, 240 (2010).
C-Phase gate:
Universal two-qubit gate. Used together with single-qubitgates to create any quantum operation.
|qubit A, qubit B>
Qubits in states 01, 10 and 00 do not interact
and thus acquire no phase shift
29-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 213
Make use of qubit states beyond 0, 1
||
2011
Two-excitation manifold
Two-Excitation Manifold of System
Strauch et al., PRL (2003): proposed using interactions with higher levels for computation in phase qubitsslide adapted from L. DiCarlo (TUD)
• Spectroscopy of higher excited states
• Avoided crossing (160 MHz)
11 02↔
Flux bias on right transmon (a.u.)
29-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 214
||
Flux bias right transmon (a.u.)
01
10
11
2-excitationmanifold
1-excitationmanifold
ζ
2001 10f f+
11 1e1 11 iϕ→
01 e10 10iϕ→
10 1e0 01 iϕ→
0
2 ( )ft
a at
f t dtϕ π δ= − ∫
Adiabatic Controlled Phase Gate
slide credit: L. DiCarlo (TUD)
0
11 10 01 2 ( )ft
t
t dtϕ ϕ ϕ π ζ= + − ∫
29-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 215
||
1 0 0 00 1 0 00 0 1 00 0 0 1
U
−
B
Adjust timing of flux pulse so that only quantum amplitude of acquires a minus sign:
11
01
10
11
1 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0
ˆ
0
i
i
i
eU
ee
ϕ
ϕ
ϕ
B
00 1001 11
00
10
01
11
Implementing the C-Phase Gate with One Flux Pulse
slide credit: L. DiCarlo (TUD)
How to verify the operation of this gate?
29-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 216
||
Process Tomography: C-Phase Gate
Nielsen, M. A. & Chuang, I. L. Cambridge University Press (2000)
arbitrary quantum process
decomposed into operator basis positive semi definite Hermitian matrix characteristic for the process
Measured χ-matrix: Re[χ] (|Im[χ]|<0.04)Controlled phase gate
χ
29-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 217
||
Re[χ] (|Im[χ]|<0.08)
Process Tomography of a C-NOT Gate
Nielsen, M. A. & Chuang, I. L. Cambridge University Press (2000)
Measured χ-matrix:Controlled-NOT gate
=
29-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 218
||
Creating 3 Qubit Entanglement: GHZ State
This data: J. Heinsoo et al., ETHZF = 88%: DiCarlo et al. Nature 467, (2010)F = 62%: Neeley et al. Nature 467, (2010)F = 96%: Barends et al. Nature 508, (2014)
Fid(𝜎𝜎,𝜌𝜌) = Tr 𝜌𝜌𝜎𝜎 𝜌𝜌†2
= 88.9% (MLE)
Real Imaginary
Measured (color) and ideal (wireframe) density matrix:Protocol
GHZ class states, e.g. |000>+|111> created using:
• single qubit gates• C-PHASE gates
29-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 220
||
GHZ-like State with 4 Qubits
This data: J. Heinsoo et al., ETHZF = 86.3%: Barends et al. Nature, 2014, 508
Real Imaginary
Fid(𝜎𝜎,𝜌𝜌) = Tr 𝜌𝜌𝜎𝜎 𝜌𝜌†2
= 74.8% (MLE)
Measured (color) and ideal (wireframe) density matrix:Protocol
29-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 221
|| 15-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 225
Conversion and Transmission of Quantum Information in Networks
A. Fowler et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 104, 180503 (2010)L.-M. Duan and C. Monroe, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1209 (2010)Reiserer and G. Rempe, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1379 (2015)
Universal quantum node: Send Receive Store Process
Direct quantum channel: Coherent link Deterministic, ideally
Applications: Creating distributed entanglement Distributed quantum computing Quantum error correction across
different nodes using surface code
||
A Challenge Addressed in Many Physical Systems
P. Kurpiers et al., arXiv:1712.08593 (2017) Cirac et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3221 (1997)
Over 15 years of experiments: Remote entanglement realized in a wide variety of
quantum systems Protocols: Single or two-photon interference + detection Measurement-induced Direct transfer with (shaped) photons Most/all probabilistic or heralded, typically with
entanglement generation rates < 100 Hz
Recently also in Superconducting Circuits: Three deterministic protocols with SC circuits Following protocol proposed by Cirac et al. realized
with shaped photons/radiation fields
15-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 3
Atomic Ensembles
Trapped Ions
Single atom Bose-Einstein condensateVibrational States of DiamondSingle atom
Nitrogen Vacancy
Superconducting Circuits
Quantum Dot
||
Cavity QED with Superconducting Circuits as a Quantum Node
A. Blais, et al. , PRA 69, 062320 (2004)A. Wallraff et al., Nature (London) 431, 162 (2004)
With superconducting circuits:
15-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 228
Josephson Junction (JJ): • 2 superconducting
materials separated by an insulator
• Non-linear inductor• Anharmoic resonator
JJ resonator
Cavity QED setup for coherent control:
Our architecture achieves:• Strong coupling in solid state system• Easy to fabricate and integrate various
elements• High level of control over individual system
parameters
||
Remote Integration
15-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 229
P. Kurpiers et al., arXiv:1712.08593 (2017)
Readout circuit Purcell filter; allows to increase
interaction rate without loss of lifetime Transmission reveals state of qubit Amplified for FPGA measurement
Transfer circuit Interaction with transmon creates
entanglement Photon emission
Nominally identical mirror circuit Time reversed dynamics Photon absorption Deterministic remote interaction
JJ resonator:Artificial Atom
|| 15-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 230
Chip Design
Walter et al., Phys. Rev. Applied 7, 054020 (2017)
Qubit: Transmon qubit drive line
Readout elements (bottom): λ/4 readout resonator λ/4 Purcell filter
Optional reset, photon-detection and photon-transfer elements (top): λ/4 readout resonator λ/4 Purcell filter
||
Remote Realization
15-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 233
chip A chip B
chip A chip B
Sample mounts Left: chip A Right: chip B Center: parametric amplifiers
Individual magnetic shields coaxial link (0.4 m) – circulator –
coaxial link (0.4 m) – HEMT
paramps
|| 15-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 237
Tunable Atom-Resonator Interaction
M. Pechal et al. Phys. Rev. X 4, 041010 (2014)S. Zeytinoglu et al., Phys. Rev. A 91, 043846 (2015)P. Kurpiers et al., arXiv:1712.08593 (2017)
Atom coupled to resonator -> JC-type Hamiltonian
𝐻𝐻𝐽𝐽𝐽𝐽 = 𝜔𝜔𝑟𝑟 𝑎𝑎†𝑎𝑎 + 𝜔𝜔𝑡𝑡𝑏𝑏†𝑏𝑏 +𝛼𝛼2𝑏𝑏†𝑏𝑏†𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏 + 𝑔𝑔(𝑎𝑎†𝑏𝑏 + 𝑔𝑔𝑏𝑏†𝑎𝑎)
Microwave drive at |𝑓𝑓, 0⟩ ↔ |𝑔𝑔, 1⟩ with Amplitude Ω and phase φ in rotating frame
𝐻𝐻eff = 𝑔𝑔 𝑡𝑡 |𝑔𝑔, 1⟩⟨𝑓𝑓, 0| + ℎ. 𝑐𝑐
With 𝑔𝑔 𝑡𝑡 ∝ 𝑔𝑔Ω 𝑡𝑡 𝑒𝑒i𝜙𝜙
Tunable interaction between atom and resonator! Excitation in resonator coupled to transmission line at rate κ |𝑔𝑔, 1⟩ population controls emission probability of single photon Generates a symmetric photon on-demand. Time-reversed interaction 𝑔𝑔 𝜏𝜏 − 𝑡𝑡 absorbs incident photon Allows deterministic remote quantum state transfer
Qutrit statetransitions
Resonator statetransitions
Coupled interactionDriven
interaction
|| 15-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 238
Time-Reversal Symmetric Photon EmissionCavity QED Strong coupling Detuned dressed state level
diagram
|𝑔𝑔, 1⟩ population … … controls emission of shaped
photon Amplitude and phase controled
by drive 𝑔𝑔 𝑡𝑡 All-microwave process Single photon emission enforced
by trapping in dark state 𝑔𝑔, 0 Stark-shift and Rabi-rate
calibration is essentialP. Magnard et al., arXiv:1801.07689 (2018)
M. Pechal et al. Phys. Rev. X 4, 041010 (2014)J. I. Cirac et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3221 (1997)
𝐻𝐻eff = 𝑔𝑔 𝑡𝑡 |𝑔𝑔, 1⟩⟨𝑓𝑓, 0| + ℎ. 𝑐𝑐𝑔𝑔 𝑡𝑡 ∝ 𝑔𝑔Ω 𝑡𝑡 𝑒𝑒i𝜙𝜙
time-symmetric photon with envelope
𝜅𝜅eff2 cosh(𝜅𝜅eff 𝑡𝑡/2)
|| 15-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 243
Measurement of Qutrit Population Dynamics upon Photon Emission
prepare qutrit in |𝑓𝑓⟩ state Apply |𝑓𝑓, 0⟩ ↔ |𝑔𝑔, 1⟩ drive Truncate at time t 𝑓𝑓 population well described my master-
equation-simulation
P. Kurpiers et al., arXiv:1712.08593 (2017)
Qutrit population at node B:
Excellent agreement with master equation simulation
𝑃𝑃𝑔𝑔=95.8 %
𝑃𝑃𝑓𝑓=0.9 %
|| 15-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 244
Measurement of Qutrit Population Dynamics upon Photon Emission
P. Kurpiers et al., arXiv:1712.08593 (2017)
Qutrit population at node B: Envelope of reflected photon:
Similar results at node A Allows to measure photon loss between A & B
Excellent agreement with master equation simulation
|| 15-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 245
Characterization of Photon Loss
P. Kurpiers et al., arXiv:1712.08593 (2017)P. Kurpiers et al., EPJ Quantum Technology 4, 8 (2017)
Similar emission dynamics and performance at node A
Photon shape disturbed by reflection at node B
Compare integrated aout τ 2
emitted from node A and B Total photon loss: 23 ± 0.5 %
Origin – based on independent measurements & manufacturer data Circulator: 13% 0.4 m cable: 4% PCB: 4%
|| 15-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 246
Absorption Dynamics of Qubit State Transfer
transfer
P. Kurpiers et al., arXiv:1712.08593 (2017)
|| 15-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 248
Absorption Dynamics of Qubit State Transfer
transfer transfer
P. Kurpiers et al., arXiv:1712.08593 (2017)
Population of receiving qutrit : Envelope of reflected photon:
𝑃𝑃𝑔𝑔=28.6 %
𝑃𝑃𝑒𝑒=67.5 %
𝑃𝑃𝑓𝑓=3.9 %
Compare with & without absorption Pabs = 98.1 ± 0.1 %
Photon loss: ~ 22 % Qubit decay and dephasing: ~ 9 %Pulse truncation: ~ 1.5%
||
Average state fidelity ℱavg𝑠𝑠 = 1
6∑⟨𝜙𝜙|𝜌𝜌m|𝜙𝜙⟩
= 86.0 ± 0.1 % >2/3
Transfer Process Matrix: Process fidelity ℱ𝑝𝑝 = Tr 𝜒𝜒𝜒𝜒ideal = 80.02 ± 0.07 % >1/2
MES: trace distance Tr[ 𝜒𝜒m − 𝜒𝜒sim 2] = 0.01415-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 249
Quantum State Transfer: Process Tomography
P. Kurpiers et al., arXiv:1712.08593 (2017)
transfer
QST
|𝑒𝑒⟩
i =12
( 𝑔𝑔 + i 𝑒𝑒 )
Prepare qubit A in six mutually unbiased input states |𝜙𝜙⟩
Quantum state tomography on qtB
ℱ|i⟩𝑠𝑠 = 87.9 ± 0.1 %
ℱ|e⟩𝑠𝑠 = 66.8 ± 0.1 %
Input state: Output state:
|| 15-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 253
Generation of Remote Entanglement
P. Kurpiers et al., arXiv:1712.08593 (2017)
entangle
2 qtQST
Protocol: Use entanglement scheme Perform full 2-qutrit state tomography
Result:Entanglement measure for multi-state systems (ccnr criterion) 𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐 = 1.612 ± 0.003 If ccnr>1 state must be entangled Excellent agreement with master
equation simulation Trace distance
Tr[ 𝜌𝜌m − 𝜌𝜌sim 2] = 0.024
||
Density matrix of qubit pair:
15-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 255
Generation of Remote Entanglement
P. Kurpiers et al., arXiv:1712.08593 (2017)
entangle
2 qtQST
Protocol: Use entanglement scheme Perform full 2-qutrit state tomography
2-qubit subspace of 2-qutrit system Bell-state 𝜓𝜓+ = ( 𝑒𝑒,𝑔𝑔 + 𝑔𝑔, 𝑒𝑒 )/√2 Fidelity ℱavg𝑠𝑠 = ⟨𝜓𝜓+|𝜌𝜌m|𝜓𝜓+⟩ = 78.9 ± 0.1 % Concurrence 𝒞𝒞 𝜌𝜌m = 0.747 ± 0.004
Master Equation Simulation: Infidelity: 1 − ℱavg𝑠𝑠 = 21.1 % from ~ 10.5 % photon loss ~ 9 % finite transmon coherence times ~ 1.5 % imperfect absorption or pulse
truncation
Pauli sets:
||
Parametric Conversion mediated remote entanglement: 3D C. Axline et al., arXiv:1712.05832 (2017)
Blue-Sideband mediated remote entanglement: 3DP. Campagne-Ibarcq et al., arXiv:1712.05854 (2017).
15-Mar-18 256
Deterministic Remote Entanglement with Microwave Photons
Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab
Raman mediated remote entanglement: 2D P. Kurpiers, P. Magnard, T. Walter et al., arXiv:1712.08593 (2017), in print
|| 257
Metrics for Remote Entanglement
with Superconducting Circuits
P. Kurpiers et al., arXiv:1712.08593 (2017) Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 15-Mar-18
Axlineet al.
Campangne-Ibarcq et al.
Kurpierset al.
Bell State Fidelity 61 % 73 % 79 %
Concurrence 0.51 - 0.75
Ent. Gen. Rate 10 kHz - 50 kHz
Protocol duration 6 𝜇𝜇𝜇𝜇 2.5 𝜇𝜇𝜇𝜇 0.2 𝜇𝜇𝜇𝜇
||
Schemes to realize remote interaction: • measurement induced (triangles)• single- (crosses) or • two-photon (squares) interference and detection • direct transfer (pentagons)• direct transfer with shaped photons (circles)
Implementations:• probabilistic unheralded (red)• probabilistic heralded (blue)• fully deterministic (green)• deterministic delivered (yellow)
15-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 258
Performance Metric Summary and ProspectsProjections from simulations With straight forward improvements to qutrit
performance and reduced photon loss:
𝜅𝜅2𝜋𝜋
= 18 MHz , 12% photon loss, T1 = T2 ~ 𝟑𝟑𝟑𝟑 𝛍𝛍𝛍𝛍
ℱ𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 = 𝜓𝜓+ 𝜌𝜌𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 𝜓𝜓+ ~ 93% Further improvements expected by heralding
highest state transfer rate: Γ = 50kHz high concurrences of remote entanglement
protocol: C = 0.75 highest deterministic (un-heralded) remote
entanglement fidelity: F = 0.80
P. Kurpiers et al., arXiv:1712.08593 (2017), in print
||
for Implementing a quantum computer in the standard (circuit approach) to quantum information processing (QIP):
#1. A scalable physical system with well-characterized qubits.#2. The ability to initialize the state of the qubits.#3. Long (relative) decoherence times, much longer than the gate-operation time.#4. A universal set of quantum gates.#5. A qubit-specific measurement capability.
plus two criteria requiring the possibility to transmit information:
#6. The ability to interconvert stationary and mobile (or flying) qubits.#7. The ability to faithfully transmit mobile qubits between specified locations.
29-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 277
The DiVincenzo Criteria
David P. DiVincenzo, The Physical Implementation of Quantum Computation, arXiv:quant-ph/0002077 (2000)
||
Protocols: TeleportationL. Steffen et al., Nature 500, 319 (2013) M.. Baur et al., PRL 108, 040502 (2012)
Quantum Computing with Superconducting Circuits
Architectures: Circuit QED A. Blais et al., PRA 69, 062320 (2004)
A. Wallraff et al., Nature 431, 162 (2004)M. Sillanpaa et al., Nature 449, 438 (2007)
H. Majer et al., Nature 449, 443 (2007)M. Mariantoni et al., Science 334, 61 (2011)
R. Barends et al., Nature 508, 500 (2014)
Deutsch & Grover Algorithms, Toffoli GateL. DiCarlo et al., Nature 460, 240 (2009)L. DiCarlo et al., Nature 467, 574 (2010)A. Fedorov et al., Nature 481, 170 (2012)
Error CorrectionM. Reed et al., Nature 481, 382 (2012)
Corcoles et al., Nat. Com. 6, 6979 (2015) Ristè et al., Nat. Com. 6, 6983 (2015) Kelly et al., Nature 519, 66-69 (2015)
Adiabatic Quantum ComputationR. Barends et al., Nature, 534, 222-226 (2016)
29-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 278
||
Quantum Simulation Applications with Superconducting Circuits
Salathe et al., PRX 5, 021027 (2015)
Solid State and Atomic Physics: Digital simulation of exchange, Heisenberg, Ising spin models
Solid State and Atomic Physics:
two-mode fermionic Hubbard models
Barends et al., Nat. Com. 6, 7654 (2015)
Photonics:Analog simulations with cavity
and/or qubit arraysHouck et al., Nat. Phys. 8, 292 (2012)
Raftery et al., PRX 4, 031043 (2014)
Eichleret al., PRX 5, 041044 (2015)O’Malley et al., PRX 6, 031007 (2016)
Quantum Chemistry: simulation of correlated systems using variational approach
29-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 280
||
Quantum Optics with Superconducting CircuitsStrong Coherent CouplingChiorescu et al., Nature 431, 159 (2004)Wallraff et al., Nature 431, 162 (2004)Schuster et al., Nature 445, 515 (2007)
Parametric Amplification & SqueezingCastellanos-Beltran et al., Nat. Phys. 4, 928 (2008)Abdo et al., PRX 3, 031001 (2013)
Microwave Fock and Cat StatesHofheinz et al., Nature 454, 310 (2008)
Hofheinz et al., Nature 459, 546 (2009)Kirchmair et al., Nature 495, 205 (2013)Vlastakis et al., Science 342, 607 (2013)
Wang et al., Science 352, 1087 (2016)
Waveguide QED –Qubit Interactions in Free Space
Astafiev et al., Science 327, 840 (2010)I.-C. Hoi et al. PRL 107, 073601 (2011)
van Loo et al., Science 342, 1494 (2013)
Root n NonlinearitiesFink et al., Nature 454, 315 (2008)
Deppe et al., Nat. Phys. 4, 686 (2008)Bishop et al., Nat. Phys. 5, 105 (2009)
29-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 281
||
Hybrid Systems with Superconducting CircuitsQuantum Dots: CNT, Gate Defined 2DEG, nanowires Delbecq et al., PRL 107, 256804 (2011)Frey et al., PRL 108, 046807 (2012)Petersson et al., Nature 490, 380 (2012)Radiation Emission: Liu et al., Science 347, 285 (2015)Stockklauser et al., PRL 115, 046802 (2015)Strong Coupling Cavity QED: Mi et al., Science 355, 156 (2017)Stockklauser et al., PRX 7, 011030 (2017)Bruhat et al., arXiv:1612.05214 (2016)
Spin Ensembles: e.g. NV centersSchuster et al., PRL 105, 140501 (2010)Kubo et al., PRL 105, 140502 (2010)
Nano-MechanicsTeufel et al., Nature 475, 359 (2011)Zhou et al., Nat. Phys. 9, 179(2013)
Polar Molecules, Rydberg, BECRabl et al, PRL 97, 033003 (2006)
Andre et al, Nat. Phys. 2, 636 (2006)Petrosyan et al, PRL 100, 170501 (2008)
Verdu et al, PRL 103, 043603 (2009)
Rydberg AtomsHoganet al., PRL 108, 063004 (2012)
zx
vz
29-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 282
||
105 Improvement in Coherence Time in 13 Years
M. Devoret, R. Schoelkopf Science 339, 1169 (2013) 29-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 283
||
Towards Quantum Error Correction
DM
DT
DB
encode
P
P
Discretize, signal errors using quantum parity checks
0
0
X
X
X
X
X
X
• IBM: Corcoles et al., Nat. Com. 6, 6979 (2015), ArXiv:1410.6419
• QuTech: Ristè, Poletto, Huang et al., Nat. Com. 6, 6983 (2015), ArXiv:1411.5542
• UCSB/Google: Kelly et al., Nature 519, 66-69 (2015), ArXiv:1411.7403
Slide courtesy of L. DiCarlo
AM
AT
000 111α β+
||
Industry & StartupsIBM Qhttp://research.ibm.com/ibm-q/
Google/UCSBhttp://web.physics.ucsb.edu/~martinisgroup/
D-Wave Systemshttps://www.dwavesys.com/
Microsofthttps://stationq.microsoft.com/
Rigetti Computinghttp://rigetti.com/
Intelhttps://phys.org/news/2015-09-intel-mn-quantum.html
29-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 285
||
The Economist
29-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 286
Quantum leaps• An entangled web: The promise of quantum
encryption• Cue bits: Why all eyes are on quantum
computers• Here, there and everywhere: Quantum
technology is beginning to come into its own• Commercial breaks: The uses of quantum
technology• Program management: Quantum computers
will require a whole new set of softwarehttp://www.economist.com/topics/quantum-computinghttp://www.economist.com/
||
Design
29-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 287
||
Fabrication
29-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 288
|| 29-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 289
Control
|| 29-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 290
Automation
|| 29-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 291
Cryogenics
||
Quantum Science and Engineering
29-Mar-18Andreas Wallraff, Quantum Device Lab 292