Premium Potash Project Driven by a Proven Management Team
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
2
Certain statements in this presentation may constitute "forward-looking" statements which involve
known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results,
performance or achievements of Potash Ridge Corporation (the "Corporation"), or industry results, to
be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by
such forward-looking statements. When used in this presentation, such statements use such words
as "may", "would", "could", "will", "intend", "expect", "believe", "plan", "anticipate", "estimate" and
other similar terminology. These statements reflect the Corporation's current expectations regarding
future events and operating performance and speak only as of the date of this presentation. Forward-
looking statements involve significant risks and uncertainties, which include, but are not limited to the
factors discussed under “A Cautionary Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements” and "Risk
Factors" in the final prospectus of the Corporation dated November 27, 2012, and should not be read
as guarantees of future performance or results, and will not necessarily be accurate indications of
whether or not such results will be achieved. Although the forward-looking statements contained in
this presentation are based upon what management of the Corporation believes are reasonable
assumptions, the Corporation cannot assure investors that actual results will be consistent with these
forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this
presentation and are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement. Subject to
applicable securities laws, the Corporation assumes no obligation to update or revise them to reflect
new events or circumstances.
A potash company focused on its
Blawn Mountain property in Utah
3
SOP: 680,000 tonnes per annumBauxite: 3.3 million tonnes per annum
EXPERIENCED AND PROVEN MANAGEMENT
OVER 80 YEARS COMBINED EXPERIENCE
Guy Bentinck President & CEOChartered Accountant;20 years mining/resource experience
Sherritt: CFO and SVP Capital Projects
Ross Phillips VP, Development10 years experience in large resource and energy sector projects
Sherritt, Capital Power
Jeff Hillis CFOChartered Accountant;10 years mining sector finance, including CFO of several public mining companies
Iberian Minerals, Excellon, Falconbridge
Paul Hampton VP, Project ManagementGeologist and Metallurgical Engineer;
~30 years experience in design, construction, start-up and management of mineral processing facilities
SNC, Washington Group, Outotec
4
Laura Nelson VP, Government and Regulatory AffairsExtensive experience in government relations, permitting and power planning, including the successful permitting of the Red Leaf oil shale project
Red Leaf Resources, Utah Government
COMPETATIVE ADVANTAGES
Large mineral deposit containing premium-quality potash
Strategically located in a mining friendly jurisdiction with established infrastructure nearby
State-owned land allows for an efficient permitting process
Historical work expedites project development
Lower risk surface mining deposit; expected low-cost producer
30 year mine life, with upside potential
PEA completed: $1.3 billion NPV at 10%; 21.3% after tax IRR
5
No known substitute
Increasing world population
Growing per capita income
Decreasing arable land
Increasing use of biofuels
~5% EXPECTED ANNUAL GROWTH IN DEMAND TO 2016
POTASH:ESSENTIAL TO THE WORLD’S FOOD SUPPLY
6
AVERAGE 47% PRICE PREMIUM OVER MOP3
SULPHATE OF POTASH (SOP) IS A PREMIUM PRODUCT
Sulphate of Potash (SOP) Muriate of Potash (MOP)
Potassium Sulphate (K2SO4) Potassium Chloride (KCl)
6 million tonnes sold in 20111 55.8 million tonnes sold in 20112
Potassium and sulphur are essential nutrients2 Crop quality/yield diminish as chloride builds up2
Improves yield, quality, taste and enhances shelf life2
1Source: Fertecon 2Source: CRU 3Based on historical data7
USES OF SOP
Fruits
Vegetables
Nuts
Horticultural Plants
Tobacco
Tea
Dry soils
Salty soil
8
HISTORICAL PRICE PREMIUM FOR SOP HAS RANGED BETWEEN 30% AND 61%
SOP PREMIUM PRICE TRENDS
1SOP, standard grade cif NW Europe (Source: Fertilizer Week)2MOP, all grades, fob Vancouver/Portland (Source: CRU)
U.S. $/tonne
SOP1 MOP2
9
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
SOP MARKET CHARACTERISTICS
1Source: Fertecon, CRU10
Global SOP Consumption and Commodity Price1
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
$900
$1,000
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 2020
(US
$/ton
ne)
To
nn
es (
000s
)
Global SOP Consumption
Historical Standard FOB NW Europe (US$/tonne SOP)
Estimated Standard FOB NW Europe (US$/tonne SOP)
6.0% CAGR for consumption
Europe23.3%
N. America8.6%
China44.3%
Rest of the World
14.9%
Africa4.6%
Central andSouth America
4.3%
SIGNIFICANT GROWTH POTENTIAL
SOP MARKET DYNAMICS
Limited production and premium price has restricted demand
SOP share of potash market: Current: ~10%Potential: >28%1
Trend toward high nutrient fertilizers
Potential to use SOP in typical cereal crop fertilizer blends instead of ammonium sulphate
India
SOP consumption:China (pop. 1.3 billion): 1.9 million tpyIndia: (pop. 1.2 billion) 50,000 tpy (<1% of country’s potash consumption)
BrazilSOP consumption = 32,000 tpy (0.4% of total potash consumption)Premium crops grown on 20% of planted land
111Based on crops that are best suited for SOP
THE BLAWN MOUNTAIN PROJECT
12
ANTICIPATED PRODUCTION BY 2016
PROJECT OVERVIEW
13
Large alunite deposit, which is expected to be processed into SOP, by-product sulphuric acid and bauxite
Target 680,000 tonnes per year of SOP by mid-2016
Historical work expedites project development
Mineral deposit to be surface mined
Proven process
SOP HOSTED IN ALUNITE
Volcanic rock mined for over 500 years
Contains alumina (Al2O3), potassium (K2O), and sulphur (SO3)
Historic source of SOP in U.S. and Australia
Long-term SOP and alumina production in Azerbaijan
14
PREVIOUS WORK ACCELERATES PROJECT DEVELOPMENT
EXTENSIVE DEVELOPMENT COMPLETED IN 1970’s
15
Approx. $25 million spent (~ $100 million in today’s dollars)
All data owned by Potash Ridge
Drilling
Resource estimate
Feasibility study
Mine plan
Engineering
Permitting
Pilot plant: 3-year operation
processing 11 tonnes/day
SIMPLE PROVEN FLOWSHEET
Potash Ridge expects the processing plant to produce:• 680,000 tonnes of SOP per annum• 1.6 million tonnes of concentrated sulphuric acid per annum
Residue from water leach process is estimated to be 3.3 million tonnes per annum of 51% alumina content bauxite, suitable for a Bayer Process
Alunite
Beneficiation
Calcination
Water Leach
51% alumina content bauxite
Potash Sulphate Solution
Crystalizer Compaction Drying Potash Sulphate
SO2 Acid Plant Sulphuric Acid
16
Flowsheet mirrors historical production processes
Bauxite suitable for a Bayer Process• Non-traditional high-grade alumina (51%) resource• Low iron / titanium concentrations compared to a traditional bauxite• Avoids the production of bauxite residue “red mud” waste • No identified heavy metals• Favorable access to markets via existing rail and port infrastructure
17
HIGH GRADE BAUXITE BY-PRODUCT
Potash Ridge bauxite:
• THA = 50.9 % (Tri -hydrate Alumina)
• Quartz = 20.6 % (Form of Silica)
• Fe2O3 = 2.58 % (Ferrous Oxide <Iron>)
• TiO2 = 1.42 % (Titanium Oxide)
• P2O5 = 0.59 % (Phosphorous Pent-oxide)
Typical bauxite:
• THA = 41.66 % (Tri -hydrate Alumina)
• Total SiO2 = 7.32% (Total Silica)
• Quartz = 1.86 % (Form of Silica)
• Fe2O3 = 5.98 % (Ferrous Oxide <Iron>)
• TiO2 = 2.43 % (Titanium Oxide)
• P2O5 = 0.06 % (Phosphorous Pent-oxide)
• TOC = 0.19% (Total Organic Carbon)
ALMOST 100 YEARS OF POTASH PRODUCTION
UTAH: AN ATTRACTIVEMINING JURISDICTION
1Forbes Magazine, November, 2011 2Fraser Institute, February, 2012
Major resource producer
Existing potash production
Best state for business1
Top quartile mining jurisdiction2
18
OUR LAND ADVANTAGE
State-owned land
Simpler permitting process
Leasehold and royalty agreements negotiated
No known adverse environmental, social or aboriginal issues
Sufficient water nearby1 – rights application made
19
MUNICIPAL AND STATE SUPPORT OF PROJECT
1Based on historic data; confirmation drilling underway
ESTABLISHED INFRASTRUCTURE NEARBY
Roads, rail and natural gas
Construction materials and equipment suppliers nearby
Skilled labour force
Access to ports of Los Angeles and Houston
20
HISTORIC DRILLING
21
320 holes drilled in 1970’s
NI 43-101 CONFIRMATION DRILLING
22
Phase 1
Area 1 – 34 holes (19 core; 15 RC)
Phase 2
Area 1 – 38 holes (12 core; 26 RC)Area 2 – 50 holes (6 core; 44 RC)
Phase 3
Area 1 – 2 RC holesArea 2 – 16 RC holes
140 holes following completion of current drilling program
Initial Mine Plan for 30 Years using NI 43-101 Compliant M&I Resources
SIGNIFICANT RESOURCE IDENTIFIED
1 Contained within alunite2 Using 1.00% cut-off grade3 The historic resources are not NI 43-101 compliant although reasonable methodologies were applied at the time. A qualified person has not done sufficient work to classify, and the Corporation is not treating, the estimates as current mineral resources or mineral reserves.
4
Area
Measured + Indicated Inferred
Resource tons (000's)
Alunite gradeSOP tons
(000's)
SOPResource
tons (000's)Alunite grade
SOP tons (000's)
SOP
grade1 grade1
NI-43-101 Compliant 2
1 156,285 37.6% 9,315 15.8% 392 46.5% 24 13.1%
2 464,442 35.6% 26,395 15.9% 250,769 34.7% 13,476 15.5%
Total: Areas 1 & 2
620,726 35.8% 35,710 15.9% 251,160 34.7% 13,500 15.5%
Historic Resources 3
3 11,600 44.0% 987 19.3% 281,400 44.0%23,950
19.3%
4 51,700 36.5% 3,667 19.4% 49,200 38.0%3,645
19.5%
Total: Areas 3 & 4
63,300 37.9% 4,654 19.4% 330,600 43.1% 27,595 19.3%
23
EXPECTED TO BE LOWEST COST SOP PRODUCER
24
Alunite Leach
Polyhalite Leach
Salk Lakes MOP/ Sul-phate Salts
Mannheim Process
Cash Cost by Production MethodAvg Cost/Tonne
Process Method and Cost Comparisons
POTASH RIDGE
Expected In ProductionIncludes expected and in-production data
1 The cost is converted from $92 per short ton. Excludes sulphuric acid and bauxite credits
$300
$386
$550
$162
$1011
25
PRELIMINARY ECONOMIC ANALYSIS RESULTSPROJECT HIGHLIGHTS
Annual Production Rates:
SOP 680,000 tonnes
Sulphuric Acid 1.6 million tonnes
Initial Mine Plan1 30 years
Capital Cost2 $1.075 billion
Cash Cost of Production (before acid credits)3,4 $101 per tonne
1 Future planned work may expand resource base and extend life of project beyond 30 years2 Excludes third party costs: power generation ($160 million), sulphuric acid plant ($180 million) and water treatment plant ($40 million) 3 The cost is converted from $92 per short ton4 Excludes potential credits related to sale of 3.3 million tonnes per annum of bauxite
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
NPV @ 10% (after tax)4 $1,331 million
Unlevered IRR (after tax)4 21.3%
26
SOP CAPITAL COST BREAKDOWN1
CAPITAL COST: $1.075 billion
24% SOP Leaching, Crystallization
and Drying
18% Calcination
17% Beneficiation
41% Contingency
and Indirects
1 Excludes third party costs: power generation ($160 million), sulphuric acid plant ($180 million) and water treatment plant ($40 million)
27
OPERATING COSTS: $101/TONNE1
79%
7%
79% Direct Plant and Mine
Production Costs
7% Other
14%Royalties
1 Excludes sulphuric acid and bauxite credits
25% Calcination
20%Labor and
Benefits
14% Beneficiation
14% Contingency
and Other
12% Powerhouse
11% Materials &
Consumables
4% SOP Leaching, Crystallization
and Drying
28
CAPITAL STRUCTURE
Millions ($)
Common Shares 81.3
Non-voting Common Shares 5.0
Total Shares Outstanding 86.3
Warrants – $ 0.50 10.7
Warrants – $1.00 5.0
Broker options/warrants 3.4
Stock options 6.8
Total Fully Diluted Shares 112.3
PROJECT TIMELINE
Stage Activity 2013 2014 2015 2016
Confirmation Drilling
Areas 1 & 2
Process Development
Metallurgical Testing and Pilot Plant (process optimization)
Permitting Project Permitting
Engineering Studies
Prefeasibility
Feasibility/Mine Design1
Construction
Civil Works, etc.
Processing Plant2
Mine2
Production Commissioning2
1. Subject to receiving a positive pre-feasibility study2. Subject to receiving a positive feasibility study
MANAGEMENT AND BOARD CURRENTLY OWN 4%
STRONG BOARD WITH DIVERSE SKILLS AND LOCAL EXPERIENCE
Rahoul Sharan, ChairmanChartered Accountant with over 30 years diversified mining experience
Former Chairman and CEO of Uranium Power Corporation
Navin DaveChairman and CEO of Stat-Ops International
Former Managing Partner, KPMG LLP
Robert C. GrossFormer Chief of Staff to Utah Governor
Former Senior Advisor, Coalition Authority of Iraq
Former Chairman and President of First Interstate Bank
Former President and CEO of Blue Healthcare Bank
Rocco RossiExperienced business strategist and public company director
Former President and COO of MGI Software Corp.
Phil WilliamsDirector, Investment Banking of Dundee Capital Markets Inc.
Former VP, Business Development Pinetree Capital and Mega Uranium Ltd.
Stephen HarapiakPresident and COO Victory Nickel Inc.
Former CEO, Potash Corp.
30
Guy Bentinck President & CEO
COMPETATIVE ADVANTAGES
Large mineral deposit containing premium-quality potash
Strategically located in a mining friendly jurisdiction with established infrastructure nearby
State-owned land allows for an efficient permitting process
Historical work expedites project development
Lower risk surface mining deposit; expected low-cost producer
30 year mine life, with upside potential
PEA completed: $1.3 billion NPV at 10%; 21.3% after tax IRR
31