Carbon Emissions at UCTGreen Campus Rangers
Bing Nix, Mxolisi Vilakazi, Chad Petersen, Nathan Burstein
INTRODUCTION
Our TeamChad Petersen Methodology / Data Analysis
Mxolisi Vilakazi Emission Factors / Data Analysis
Bing Nix Data Analysis
Nathan Burstein Project Leader
Our FocusElectricity at Residences
Graduate School of Business Campus
Hiddingh Campus
LPG
TODAY’S PRESENTATION
• Project Execution
• Data Collection
• Data Analysis
• Analysis• Recommendations
• Calculation of Carbon Footprint
• Limitations & Challenges
• Reflection
PROJECT EXECUTION
Stakeholder Buy-In
Create Collection &
Analysis Methodology
Collect Data
Report & Recommend on Findings
Analyse All Data
Report & Recommend on Findings
Initiation & Planning Execution Final Deliverables
Present Findings
Project Reflection
DATA COLLECTION
Purchased Electricity Data
Purchased Gas Data
Emission Factors
Emissions Data
Data Analysis
RecommendationsCarbon Emission
Report
DATA ANALYSIS: GSB
Monthly electricity consumption from GSB attributable to UCT.
Janu
ary
Febru
ary
Mar
chApr
ilM
ayJu
neJu
ly
Augus
t
Septe
mbe
r
Octob
er
Novem
ber
Decem
ber
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
2012
Average
Month
En
erg
y C
on
sum
pti
on
(K
Wh
)
Janu
ary
Febru
ary
Mar
chApr
ilM
ayJu
neJu
ly
Augus
t
Septe
mbe
r
Octob
er
Novem
ber
Decem
ber
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Average
Month
En
erg
y C
on
sum
pti
on
(K
Wh
)
DATA ANALYSIS: HIDDINGH
Monthly electricity consumption at the Hiddingh campus
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
2012
Month
En
erg
y C
on
sum
pti
on
(M
Wh
)
DATA ANALYSIS: RESIDENCES
Monthly electricity consumption across all residences.
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
2012
Distribution of UCT’s emissions from electricity consumption across the areas covered in this report for 2012.
DATA ANALYSIS: ELECTRICITY
14%1%
85%
GSBHiddinghRes
18%
24%
30%
28%Liesbeck GardensForest HillObz SquareRochester
Emission Source Emissions(Tons
CO2e/yr)
Contribution (%)
Hiddingh Electricity 115,51 0,96%
Residence Electricity 10006,48 83,18%
GSB Electricity 1599,81 13,3%
UCT LPG 307,5 2,56%
Residence LPG 16.93 0.13%
TOTALS 12029 100
CARBON EMISSION FOOTPRINT
Distribution of carbon emissions across all areas covered in this report
1%
3%
13%
83%
Res LPG
Hiddingh Electricity
Main Campus LPG
GSB Electricity
Res Electricity
5%
95%
Residence
Main Campus
BENCHMARKING
Letete
• Emission Factors
• Data
• Hiddingh – New data made available• Residences – Estimates no longer used• LPG & Acetylene
• Other Universities
LIMITATIONS & CHALLENGES
Multiple Data sources
Lack of granularity (Quality)
Data availability
Scheduling
PROJECT REFLECTION
• Establish Communication Protocols
• Tools Employed• Meetings
• Building Trust Within in the Team
• Bring Meaning and Symphony
• Perspectives of Thinking
• Time Management
CONCLUSION