YOU ARE DOWNLOADING DOCUMENT

Please tick the box to continue:

Transcript
Page 1: Information for Delegation Holders

Information for Delegation Holders

Peter GillAirworthiness Engineer

Page 2: Information for Delegation Holders

Topics to be covered: Delegation Changes since 2009 Major Design Change Authorisation

Process Manufacturing Considerations STC’s AC’s Other Miscellaneous Topics

Page 3: Information for Delegation Holders

Delegation Changes since 2009

No approval of modification classified as “major design change” (schedule One) without CAA authorisation

CAA undertook to give authorisation for appropriate “one-off” modifications where not contrary to CAA policy

All delegations which included modifications were re-issued August 2010

Page 4: Information for Delegation Holders

Authorisation Process

Page 5: Information for Delegation Holders

Authorisation Requests 2010 10 Yes 0 No 2011 54 Yes 5 No Reasons for No: 1 – Unusual design features

1 – HEC (CAA Policy – STC)1 – 21.303 (later authorised)1 – Operational Concern1 – TCDS Change

2012 10 Yes 0 No

Page 6: Information for Delegation Holders

Manufacturing Considerations

Part 146 organisations approve data – do not authorise manufacture

CAA expect part 146 organisations to promote compliance with Rules where possible

CAA has publicised compliance with 21.303 to industry (Vector magasine article Nov/Dec 2010)

Factor in authorisation process

Page 7: Information for Delegation Holders

Manufacturing Considerations Contd

CAR 21.303 – be manufactured “by a person performing maintenance on the product…” No subcontracting (can supervise) NOTE: “Subcontracting” term here is used in the

manufacturing sense where the manufacturer takes responsibility for the subcontractors work.

Where the “subcontractor” has an organisation certificate of its own and can issue a release certificate, that is acceptable (they are then a “supplier” rather than a ‘subcontractor”.)

Page 8: Information for Delegation Holders

Manufacturing Considerations Contd

How to approved “existing” equipment (where origin unknown)? Should be a document (Form One or

Two) identifying part and origin Part 21Q has always required part

marking

Page 9: Information for Delegation Holders

STC’s See later presentation from Beth Small number of “New” STC’s Large number started, stalled Time delays – CAA extra assessment Certification Basis – Determine iaw FAR

21.101 Changed Product Rule Requirement for any STC where FAA validation is likely to

be sought Should always specify why you can’t/don’t use the latest

requirements

Page 10: Information for Delegation Holders

Advisory Circulars Advisory Circulars to be revised or

written by ACU (we welcome comments or suggestions): AC 146-1 - Clarify CAA position on “one-

man-bands”; Clarify Delegation Issue Process; General Update

AC 148-1 – General Update; Remove Extraneous material; Clarify CAA position on Subcontractors, senior person qualifications, Critical Parts, Design Data.

Page 11: Information for Delegation Holders

Advisory Circulars Contd

AC 43-9 (Mods, Repairs, 337) – Complete re-write and update

AC 91-5 (PEDS) – General update New AC on aircraft Electrical Load Analysis - Probably an AC 91-X – detailing how the owner

should maintain an ELA for his aircraft

Page 12: Information for Delegation Holders

Miscellaneous Topics Where making a minor change to a

“major design change” – is this major? Original approver? Effect of change?

Continuation of Class A/B delegation classifications? Not yet determined

Page 13: Information for Delegation Holders

Miscellaneous Topics Contd

Delegation of Part 146 activities: Testing Data (eg Weight & Balance data)

Electrical/Mechanical demarcation 1309 training – Seen by CAA as

essential

Page 14: Information for Delegation Holders

Miscellaneous Topics Contd

Surveillance – effect of new policy Increased preparation More targeted audit No change to delegate monitoring

Page 15: Information for Delegation Holders

Questions?


Related Documents