Experimenting with Alternative
Assessments
Sara BergersonKirby Stein
Presentation Objectives
To present ideas for progress and achievement assessments that can be used and modified to fit different classrooms.
To present ideas for assessments and activities that can support and work within existing testing structures.
What comes to mind when you hear the word
“assessment?”
Why do we test?
How can we effectively assess progressive and
achievement?
What does an alternative assessment look like?
Possible Features
Usually requires rubric development
Usually requires more student activity
Can use a variety of formats
Often formative Can be customized More authentic
Examples
Surveys Critiques Blogs Interpretations Debates Panel discussions Student-led
teaching
Why Use Alternative Assessments?
Can fit the learning style, cultural/linguistic background, and demographics of any student (Tannenbaum, 1996).
Shows the students’ progress toward a learning objective (Huerta-Marcias, 1995).
Students can show their abilities, knowledge, and skills rather than imitating or repeating structures (Huerta-Marcias, 1995).
Focuses on what students know and can do rather than what they are lacking (Tannenbaum, 1996).
Examples of Formal and Informal Alternative Assessments in action* Blogs Social Media Profiles Student-led Teaching Debate Interviews Vocabulary Cards
*see handout for variations and more
Blogs Objective: To improve daily fluency,
comfort, and interaction in writing.
Assignment: Students created an online blog to which they made one contribution each week about a topic of their choice. They were also required to comment on one other student’s blog each week.
Assessment: Informally assessed fluency. Graded for level of completion and amount of interaction.
Social Media Profiles Objective: To assess students’ knowledge,
understanding, and analysis of characters in a short story through media role play.
Assignment: Students chose a character from a short story and created a Facebook profile for that character. They were able to fill out the character’s personal information and life events, select pictures to represent them, and post dialogue or appropriate comments on their own walls or on each others’ walls.
Assessment: Formally assessed character comprehension and analysis. Graded with rubric assessing level of completion, accuracy of information, use of pertinent language
Social Media Profile RubricCategory 1 2 3 4Accuracy
(40%)Information was false, unsupported, or plagiarized. No inferences were made.
Student used obvious information from the text, but did not make inferences regarding the character’s persona, or made incorrect inferences.
Student used correct information from the text, and made good inferences regarding the character’s persona.
Student used explicit and correct information from the text, and make excellent inferences regarding the character’s persona.
Completion(35%)
Student left many components blank, and did not participate fully in the activity.
Student completed some basic components, but did not elaborate or demonstrate knowledge of details.
Student completed many elements of the profile, but may not have elaborated to demonstrate knowledge of details.
Student completed as many components as possible, utilizing a variety of functions of the profile. Evidence of details and elaboration are present.
Language Use(25%)
Student used none of the target vocabulary, grammar, or sentence structures. Key words in the text are not used.
Student shows many errors with the target vocabulary, grammar, or sentence structure. Key words in the text are rarely used correctly.
Student shows a grasp of the target vocabulary, grammar, or sentence structure. Key words in the text are used, though sometimes incorrectly.
Student shows a mastery of the target vocabulary, grammar, and sentence structure. Key words in the text are utilized appropriately and accurately.
Student-Led Teaching (Article) Objective: To assess students’ ability to identify and
extrapolate key issues and vocabulary as well as main ideas and important points in an article.
Assignment: Students chose an article related to the themes that had been discussed in the class and presented it. They were required to provide discussion questions for the class and explain key vocabulary from the article.
Assessment: Formally assessed reading comprehension. Graded using a rubric assessing level of completion, accuracy of information presented, quality of content, and participation (in the presentations of others)
Student- Led Teaching Rubric 100 - 90 89 - 80 79 - 70 70>
Content (40%)
Article is of proper length and academic quality. Activities are
appropriate, excellently executed, and very
effective.
Article is of proper length and academic quality. Activities and questions are mostly
appropriate and reasonably effective.
Article is slightly short, and perhaps is lacking
academic quality. Activities and questions
are generally appropriate, though not
always effective.
Article is too short, and components of the
assignment are missing. Activities and questions are inappropriate and
ineffective when present.
Completion (30%)
Lesson shows a great deal of planning,
thought, and consideration. Activities and questions are well
prepared and the lesson is smooth and coherent.
Lesson shows planning, thought, and consideration.
Activities and questions are pre-
prepared, with only a few hiccups.
Lesson shows little planning, thought, and
consideration. Activities and questions are only somewhat prepared,
and there may be missing or incomplete
elements.
Lesson shows little to no planning, thought, or
consideration. Requirements are
missing. Activities and questions seem
improvised or very poorly planned.
Accuracy (20%)
A very high level of comprehension is demonstrated.
Assertions regarding content, analysis, and vocabulary are correct
and extremely well communicated.
A high level of comprehension is demonstrated.
Assertions regarding content, analysis, and vocabulary are correct
and reasonably well communicated.
General comprehension is demonstrated.
Assertions regarding content, analysis, and vocabulary are mostly
correct and satisfactorily communicated.
Comprehension appears to be incomplete only on the surface. Assertions
regarding content, analysis, and vocabulary are frequently incorrect
or poorly communicated.
Participation (10%)
Student very effectively leads the other
students, and is an active participant in other presentations.
Student effectively leads the other
students, and is a participant in other
presentations.
Student leads the other students, and is present but not active in other
presentations.
Student is absent for other presentations,
and/or does not effectively lead the class.
Debate Objective: Students will practice and utilize
argumentative language in a formal debate setting, thereby practicing presentation skills.
Assignment: Students were divided into two teams and assigned a side of an issue to research. Students were then required to prepare and deliver a statement of position, challenges to the opposing team’s arguments, and effective rebuttals.
Assessment: Formally assessed speaking and argumentative language use. Graded using rubric; self-assessment also used.
Debate Example
Interviews Objective: To assess students’ abilities to
synthesize vocabulary and themes presented across multiple units by designing and conducting interviews and then analyzing and evaluating results and data for a presentation
Assignment: Students worked in teams to select a subtopic relating to thematic units, develop 10 – 15 interview questions, interview multiple native speakers, compile data, create a graphic representation of data, and present their findings.
Assessment: Formally assessed Rubric, self assessment, team assessment
Interview RubricDescription Points Score
Assignment guidelines are followed 5 Information is presented in a logical order
5
Signal words are used to show transitions between parts of the presentation
5
Introduction captures the audience’s attention and outlines the thesis or main point
10
Presentation contains accurate and relevant information
10
Facts, statistics, and/or examples are relevant and used to support main ideas
10
Conclusion summarizes main points and engages the audience
10
Grammar and vocabulary are used correctly and appropriately
10
Pronunciation, stress, and intonation are understandable
10
Eye contact is appropriate and maintained throughout the presentation
5
Body language is appropriate and animated
5
Speaker’s voice is clear and audible 5 Visual aids are informative, effective, and are not distracting
5
Length of presentation is within the assigned time limits.
5
Total Points 100
Category
Organization(15 points)
Content(40 points)
Language Skills(20 points)
Delivery(25 points)
Score
Vocabulary Cards Objective: To assess students’ comprehension
and utilization of new vocabulary words.
Assignment: On a blank piece of construction paper, students will write the word, its definition, synonyms, an example sentence, and its part of speech, and will then create a visual representation of the word.
Assessment: Informally assessed vocabulary comprehension and utilization. Graded for completion and accuracy
Vocabulary Card Example
Now, it’s your turn!
What alternative assessments have you used?
How effective were they? How did you grade them? What were the pros and cons?
Resources Blogs: www.blogspot.com Social media in the classroom: http://
www.educationnation.com/index.cfm?objectid=D25A95BE-6152-11E1-8D32000C296BA163
Student-led teaching: http://www.soundout.org/teaching.html
http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Ogawa-StudentsTeach.html
Debate: http://www.educationworld.com/a_lesson/lesson/lesson304b.shtml
Interviews: www.ndfb.org/image/cache/Interview_planner.doc
Vocabulary Cards: http://www.eslpartyland.com/teachers/skills/ideasvocab.htm
References
Huerta-Macias, A. (1995). Alternative assessment: Responses to commonly asked questions. TESOL Journal, 5, 8-10.
Tannenbaum, J. (1996). Practical ideas on alternative assessment for ESL students. CAL Digest Online.
Thank you!Please email us with any questions!