YOU ARE DOWNLOADING DOCUMENT

Please tick the box to continue:

Transcript
Page 1: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015.

MetrixIDR Five-Minute ModelingElectric Reliability Council of Texas

February 2015

Page 2: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015.

2

Overview

» Five-Minute Modeling Pre-Process• Filtering the data• Smoothing the data (TOU Parameters)

» Five Minute Module Base Framework• Level Model• Ramp Rate Model• Day Ahead Model• Blending Issues

» Other Modeling Considerations• Cross Day Bias• Forecast Overrides

Page 3: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015.

3

Load Noise Creates Forecast Instability

Page 4: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015.

4

Goal is Forecast Stability

Page 5: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015.

5

Eliminating Data Outliers

» The first task is to eliminate data outliers

» MetrixIDR has two main methods for eliminating data outliers:

1. Meter Validation Parameters• Comprehensive set of validation options• Validation is not model dependent, i.e., how well the data are

validated is not dependent upon the selected model’s performance

• Typically the more preferred of the two methods

2. Modified Kalman Filter• Validation is model dependent

Page 6: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015.

6

Eliminating Data Outliers

Page 7: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015.

7

Page 8: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015.

8

Page 9: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015.

9

Page 10: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015.

10

Smooth the Data

» The second task is to smooth the data using an Augmented Savitsky-Golay (SG) Filter to dampen random measurement noise

• Removes unnecessary movements in the forecast horizon• Estimating with smoothed data allows for smooth coefficients

Page 11: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015.

11

Page 12: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015.

12

Page 13: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015.

Smoothing ParametersSavitsky-Golay Weights capture bends in the moving average process

13

Page 14: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015.

14

Smoothing Parameters Issue

» The issue with smoothing is smoothing parameters create bias at the end of the actual data series because the smoothing is “centered”

Page 15: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015.

15

Page 16: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015.

16

» Enabling “Lift” essentially applies a ratio using polynomial weights and observations from previous intervals to compute future intervals

Smoothing Parameters Lift

Page 17: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015.

17

Page 18: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015.

Smoothing Parameters Lift

Lift

Only applied interval where a full centered moving average cannot be calculated.

Examples:

1. No DOW, Lift Days = 1

Obtain average correction factors between the smoothed series without future values and the actual using only the prior day (Lift Days = 1, No DOW), same time interval and correct the current day intervals.

2. DOW, Lift Days = 2

Obtain average correction factors based on the same time interval, same day of the week in the prior two weeks (Lift Days = 2, Yes DOW).

18

Page 19: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015.

Viewing the Smoothed Data

19

Smoothed, “filtered” data cuts through the noise

Page 20: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015.

20

Overview

» Five-Minute Modeling Pre-Process• Filtering the data• Smoothing the data (TOU Parameters)

» Five Minute Module Base Framework• Level Model• Ramp Rate Model• Day Ahead Model• Blending Issues

» Other Modeling Considerations• Cross Day Bias• Forecast Overrides

Page 21: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015.

21

Advantages to Five-Minute Modeling Framework

» Level Model• Focus on very short term• Tends to be autoregressive

» Ramp Model• Focus on changes and ramp periods of time

» Day Ahead Model• Captures all possible variables• Provides shape for the day

» Blending• Allows for different focuses based on time of use

Page 22: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015.

22

Framework: Level Model

Y is Load (MW)

Issues:• Very short-term• Lag Loads should dominate the model effect• Lag Loads are needed to launch the forecast off the last actual• Autoregressive models tend to perform poorly in the long term

Yt = f (Yt-1,Xt)

Other X variables help model as a fine adjustment to the lag relationship

Page 23: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015.

June Morning Hours

600.00

800.00

1,000.00

1,200.00

1,400.00

1,600.00

1,800.00

2,000.00

2,200.00

2,400.00

1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 81 86 91 96 101 106 111 116 121 126 131 136 141

4:15am5:15am

6:15am7:15am

Load Space Example

23

Page 24: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015.

Framework: Ramp Model

Y is change in Load(MW)

Issues:• Ramp rate forecast continues from Level forecast or last actual value• Stability is based on movement of the last actual value• Autoregressive variables tend to be weaker • Autoregressive variables create a Yt = f (Yt-1, Yt-2) relationship

Yt = f (Yt-1,Xt) or

X variables are used to define the varying shape through the year

Yt = f (Xt)

24

Page 25: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015.

June Morning Hours

-70.00

-50.00

-30.00

-10.00

10.00

30.00

50.00

1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 81 86 91 96 101 106 111 116 121 126 131 136 141

4:15am

5:15am 6:15am7:15am

Ramp Rate Space Example

25

Page 26: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015.

Framework: Day Ahead

Y is Load (MW)

Issues:• Day Ahead models tend to be stable throughout the day• Typically used for next day forecasting, but may contain current day

components as well

X variables are used to define both the level and shape for the day

Yt = f (Xt)

26

Page 27: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015.

Level + Ramp Rate + Day Ahead Forecast

27

Page 28: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015.

28

Model Issues

» Y Variable• Should I smooth Y before estimation?

» Level Model• How many periods should I lag?• How long should this model be applied?

» Ramp Model• Do I need lag variables?• How do I capture seasonal shapes?• How long should this model be applied?

» Day Ahead Model• What is the original purpose of the Day Ahead Model?• How far in the future should the model be applied?

Page 29: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015.

29

Overview

» Five-Minute Modeling Pre-Process• Filtering the data• Smoothing the data (TOU Parameters)

» Five Minute Module Base Framework• Level Model• Ramp Rate Model• Day Ahead Model• Blending Issues

» Other Modeling Considerations• Cross Day Bias• Forecast Overrides

Page 30: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015.

Cross Day Bias Adjustment

» The Cross Day Bias Adjustment is a post-forecast adjustment» Once MetrixIDR completes the five-minute forecast, MetrixIDR will adjust

the forecast based on a historical set of adjustment factors

Step 1: Calculate Forecast Errors

Step 2: Average Errors

Step 3: Calculate the Bias

Step 4: Apply the Bias

Use Centered Moving Average

Use Adjustment Weights

30

Page 31: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015.

31

Page 32: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015.

THANK YOU

www.itron.com

ITRON SAN DIEGO

12348 High Bluff Drive, Suite 210

San Diego, CA 92130

858 724 2620

858 724 2690


Related Documents