YOU ARE DOWNLOADING DOCUMENT

Please tick the box to continue:

Transcript
Page 1: Claus Pias: A Media Archaeology of Computer Games

claus Piasa media archaeology of computer gamesSebastian DeterdingMAGIC Lab, Rochester Institute of TechnologyDiGRA 2013, Atlanta, August 28, 2013

cb

Page 2: Claus Pias: A Media Archaeology of Computer Games

2

claus pias

* 1967

Professor, media theory and history; director, Center for Digital Cultures, Leuphana University Lüneburg

Dissertation at Bauhaus University Weimar under Joseph Vogl

Page 3: Claus Pias: A Media Archaeology of Computer Games

3

michel foucaultArchaeology of Knowledge

marshall mcluhanMedium Theory

friedrich kittler(War) media technologies as conditions of possibility for historical forms of knowing

media history, made in germany

Page 4: Claus Pias: A Media Archaeology of Computer Games

an archaeology of cybernetics

• Cybernetics/simulation/computation is the episteme of our age, computers are its media-technical condition of possibility

• Information processing is the main object, output, boundary, starting point of knowing today

• Information processing = cosm0s = thinking = meaning: a soul-less, body-less machine

• As cybernetics waned as a philosophy in the 1970s, it became naturalised as CS

• Cybernetics must ignore the analog and materiality4

Page 5: Claus Pias: A Media Archaeology of Computer Games

an archaeology of cybernetics

• McLuhan understood media as extensions of man

• Cybernetics understands computers as »human-extended machines« (Licklider): flattens thinking/acting, man/machine, mind/matter

• Computer games exemplify the cybernetic conditions of possibility of knowing

5

Page 6: Claus Pias: A Media Archaeology of Computer Games

6

2002 2011

Page 7: Claus Pias: A Media Archaeology of Computer Games

computer spiel welten

• Why are computer games (the way they are)?

• What are the historical (discursive, technical) conditions of possibility for computer games to emerge?

• How do they in turn condition the forms of knowing possible in and with computer games?

• 3 discursive fields and cases show the homology of computer games and cybernetics: action/SAGE, adventure/Internet, simulation/war games

7

Page 8: Claus Pias: A Media Archaeology of Computer Games

actionAttentive time-critical selection of optimal actions

8

Page 9: Claus Pias: A Media Archaeology of Computer Games

action

• Time-critical choice of predefined actions: Taylorist scientific management

• Machine-tracking of human action in numbers: experimental psychology, WWI Army Mental Tests

• Training and control of users: behaviorism

• Real-time interaction with GUI invisibilizing rules: Computerisation of flight simulation training

9

Page 10: Claus Pias: A Media Archaeology of Computer Games

adventureReasoned decision-critical choice of optimal routes

10

arpanet

colossal cave

Page 11: Claus Pias: A Media Archaeology of Computer Games

adventure

• World as mapping of node relations: relational databases

• History as routing through and changing of nodes: graph theory as used in telephone routing algorithms

• Decision-making as memory-less result of current node state

11

Page 12: Claus Pias: A Media Archaeology of Computer Games

simulationPatient configuration-critical choice of optimal possible set

12

Page 13: Claus Pias: A Media Archaeology of Computer Games

simulation

• Numerical modelling of decision-making: mathematic game theory

• Translation of reality into probability distributions: WWII operations research

• Model-based exploration of possible futures: war games

• Object-oriented programming: SIMULA

13

Page 14: Claus Pias: A Media Archaeology of Computer Games

why care?

Page 15: Claus Pias: A Media Archaeology of Computer Games

»You are all just replicating the cybernetic episteme of our age.

What are your blind spots and limits of knowing?«

historicizing proceduralism

15


Related Documents