Biochemical conversion of rice straw into bioethanol - an exploratory investigation
Dr. K. SUBRAMANIANProfessor
Department of BiotechnologyBannari Amman Institute of Technology
Sathyamangalam-638 401Tamil Nadu
INTRODUCTION
Growing energy demands in transportation, industrial and other sectors with a simulta-neous reduction of green house gas emissions.
INTRODUCTION
Solar produced ecofriendlycheap biomass ( lignocellu-losics,150 billion ton/annum ) -renewable resource for biofuels -an alternative fuel or oxygenate additive to the fossil fuels
INTRODUCTION
Plants contain 6 x 1011 tones of hemicellulose and about 3 x 1010
tonnes are photosynthesized annually. Hemicelluloses are low molecular weight compounds with DPn 200.
WHY BIOETANOL FROM BIOMASS?
i) biomasses are geographically more evenly distributed than fossil fuels &hence the energy sourceswill be domestic and provide security of supply, ii) lignocellulosic wastes minimize the potential conflict between land use for food (and feed) and energy feedstock production,
WHY BIOETHANOL FROM BIOMASS?
iii) the raw material is less expensive than conventional agricultural feedstock, iv) it (ex.switch grass) can also be produced with lower input of fertilizers, pesticides, and energy. v) biofuels from biomass- economic, environmental friendly (low emission of green house gas) vi) it can also provide employment in rural areas
PLANT BIOMASSPLANT BIOMASS
Cellulose Hemicellulose Lignin
Glucose Xylose(mannose,arabinose& galactose)
Ethanol
Chemicals & solvents
Fuels, chemicals, solvents, Beverages, Enegy, ATP, Petrochemical synthesis
PRETREATMENT
Saccharification of biomass- affected by porosity, fiber crystallinity, lignin and hemicellulose contentsLignin acts as a physical barrier should be removed to facilitate saccharificationPretreatment- mechanical, physical, chemical or biological- make cellulose to be more accessible to enzymes via removal of lignin and hemicellulose, reduction of cellulose crystallinity, and increase in porosity.
RICE STRAW-COMPOSITION & PRODUCTION
Rice straw( cellulose: 37%, hemicell-ulose:24% &lignin(14%)-an abundant biomass. Production 731 million tones/annum - produce about 205 billion litre bioethanol .Wheat and rice straw together : 200 million tonnes/ annum in India1 kg rice straw has 350 g of cellulose which depends upon variety and the geographical location. This can theoret-ically yield 220 g /283 ml ethanol.
SACCHARIFICATION OF CELLULOSE: METHODS
Cellulose to ethanol by either SSF or SHFprocess. SSF is more favored because of its low potential costsDrawback of SSF : Different optimum temperatures for hydrolyzing enzymes and fermenting microorganisms. SHF method is followed here.
PRETREATMENT OF RICE STRAW
Rice straw( Collected locally) washed and desoiled by froth-floatation in water, air dried & chopped into small pieces. Partially delignified using 4 % NH4OH at 15 bar &120oC for 20 min in an autoclave at a volume ratio of 5:4 Washed with hot water repeatedly till free from alkali. NH4OH treated rice straw is dipped in 1% sulphuric acid and autoclaved at 120oC for 15 min at 15 bar
RICE STRAW SACCHARIFICATION
Done by using acid or enzyme catalyst or a combination of these two. Acid hydrolysis: 3 % sulfuric acid solun. Enzyme hydrolysis : Cellulase (liquid) enzyme (ROSSARI BIOTECH) optimum pH range :4.5-6 in 2M citrate buffer at 45oC over a period of 24 hrs.
TG Data for Rice straw
Rice straw sample%
Weight loss at(oC)100 250 350
%Residue (400oC)
Desoiled(virgin)
6 14 46 48
Acid treated
10 18 69 21
Acid -NH4OH treated
15 28 82 Nil
Sugar and ethanol yields per 25 g of desoiled rice straw
Saccharification method
Sugar yield (g) / 25 g of rice straw
Theo Expt
Ethanol yield (g) from 25g of rice straw
Theo ExptEthanol yield (g) from 25g of rice straw
11 6.5 5.6 3.2
Acid-Enzyme
hydrolysis
11 9.5 5.6 4.8
Enzyme
hydrolysis
11 8.3 5.6 4.2
FT-IR SPECTRUM
The reductions in intensity of the peak at 1540 cm-1 and reduction in I1634cm-1 /I2924cm-1 intensity ratio from 1.2(virgin) to 0.766 in NH4OH treated rice straw are attributed to delignification.
FT-IR Spectral data
Frequency (cm-1)
Assignment
3416292417351635 1540 1410 CH2 (bending)
1310-136013771200 11701105 1080 C-O-C(pyranose ring skeletal vibration)1030990
O-H (stretching)C-H (stretching)O=C-O (stretching)C=O (stretching)C=C (aromatic ring stretching)
C-C and C-O (skeletal vibrations.)C-H (bending)C-O (stretching in pyronose ring )C-O(antisymmetric bridge stretching )C-OH (skeletal vibrations)
C-O (C-6 skeletal vibrations)
C-O(sec.alcohols skeletal vibration
CONCLUSIONS
saccharification - more effective in the combined successive acid and enzyme catalysis. The sugar and ethanol yields are 10-12% more in this method compared to those with liquid enzymatic saccharification-cum- fermentation.
CONCLUSION
This is due to better accessibility of the cellulose to cellulase enzyme by the removal of hemicellulose and lignin. Substantiated by its faster thermal degradation in the temperature range 200-400oC and nearly complete degradation at 400o C in the former case.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The author is very thankful to i) Chairman Dr.S.V.Balasubramaniam,
Director Dr. S.K.Sundararaman &The Principal, Bannari Amman Instit. of Tech. for the permission to present the paper&
ii) ii) The Winrock International India for giving me an opportunity to present my paper and making necessary arrange-ments for the conference.