2
jakebeal.blogspot.com320 × 255Search by image
3
http://jasonpriem.org/2010/10/medline-literature-growth-chart/
4
http://editorsupdate.elsevier.com/poll-results/pressure-grants-publish-driving-rise-unethical-practices-authors/
Yes
5
“the inflated value given to publishing in a small number of so-called “high impact” journals has put pressure on authors to rush into print, cut corners, exaggerate their findings, and overstate the significance of their work.”
10
Continuous Evaluation
Editor Reviewers
Authors
Editor Reviewers
Authors
Editor Reviewers
Authors
Editor Reviewers
Authors
Pre-publication Y1 Y2 Y3
13
ALM Reports
alm.plos.org
Allows researchers, institutions & funders to: • create a report of the ALMs for a
single or set of PLOS articles • view a summary of the metrics
along with an accompanying set of data visualizations.
Search based on: • keyword• author name & country • affiliation• publication date• subject areas• funder
Open Evaluation: Importance to Science & Shared Knowledge
This work makes a minor contribution to the field of study
This work makes a significant contribution to science knowledge
This work advances the field
If the user selects either of these two options, display the following:
If the user selects either of these two options, display the following:
This work is a major scientific breakthrough
This work has an important or novel method
This work will lead to reinterpretation of well- established findings
This work opens a new area of inquiry in the field
This work has an important or significant conclusion:
This work makes little to no contribution to science knowledge
I think this work was not worth doing