THIRD ANIMP CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE & ECI AUTUMN FORUM
Milan. Italy, october 12, 2012
PUSHING THE LIMITS OF ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION
1
3D MODELING AS SUPPORT FOR
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES: STEPS FORWARD FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
THIRD ANIMP CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE & ECI AUTUMN FORUM
Milan. Italy, october 12, 2012
PUSHING THE LIMITS OF ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION
2
TASK FORCE “MODELLO 3D E COSTRUZIONE” SCOPE
ANIMP – CONSTRUCTION SECTION, WITHIN ITS 2012 STUDIES PROGRAM, IDENTIFIED THE USE OF 3D MODEL IN CONSTRUCTION AS ONE OF THE TOPICS WORTHY TO BE INVESTIGATED
A DEDICATED TASK FORCE HAS BEEN COMMISSIONED IN OCTOBER 2011, CONSTITUTED BY EXPERTS IN METHODOLOGIES AND SYSTEMS ADOPTED IN CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, FROM MAJOR ITALIAN EPC CONTRACTORS.
THE TASK FORCE HAD THE TARGET OF ANALYZING AND REPORTING THE PRESENT STATUS AND THE POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OF 3D MODEL IN CONSTRUCTION
THIRD ANIMP CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE & ECI AUTUMN FORUM
Milan. Italy, october 12, 2012
PUSHING THE LIMITS OF ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION
3
TASK-FORCE “MODELLO 3D E COSTRUZIONE” MEMBERS:
MASSIMILIANO DEL RIO - TECNIMONT - COORDINATOR
EMIDIO DI FELICE, MARIO FICO, MASSIMO FANTASIA - SAIPEM
GIANLUCA DI LECCE, SIMONE ATZORI - TECHINT
TATIANA LIPINSKAIA - ROSETTI MARINO
SALVATORE LONGO, MARCO DI GENNARO, - TECHNIP ITALY
RICCARDO MURATORE - SICES CONSTRUCTION
VALERIO PACE, MARCO DANZINI - FOSTER WHEELER ITALIANA
TRISTANO SAINATI – POLITECNICO DI MILANO
ANIMP CONSTRUCTION SECTION REPRESENTATIVES INVITED TO TASK FORCE MEETINGS:
ANGELO ZUCCONI, FRANCESCO DI SERIO - ANIMP COMITATO ORGANIZZATIVO SEZIONE COSTRUZIONE
MAURO MANCINI - POLITECNICO DI MILANO - ANIMP DELEGATO SEZIONE COSTRUZIONE
SOFTWARE HOUSES, ANIMP MEMBERS, INVITED TO FEEDBACK MEETINGS:
AVEVA SA, BENTLEY SYSTEMS ITALIA, INTERGRAPH ITALIA
THIRD ANIMP CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE & ECI AUTUMN FORUM
Milan. Italy, october 12, 2012
PUSHING THE LIMITS OF ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION
4
ACTIVITIES CARRIED-OUT BY THE TASK-FORCE
1. INTERNAL PRESENTATIONS AND DEBATE ON EXISTING CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT METHODOLOGIES IMPLEMENTATION IN TF MEMBER’S COMPANIES
2. SELECTION OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AREAS WORTHY TO BE FURTHER INVESTIGATED FOR POSSIBLE ENHANCEMENTS THROUGH 3DMODEL ADOPTION.
3. FEEDBACK FROM SITE PERSONNEL FOR VALIDATION OF FOCUSED THEMES THROUGH ONLINE SURVEY
4. FEEDBACK FROM SOFTWARE HOUSES: SOFTWARE FEATURES PRESENTLY RESPONDING TO SELECTED REQUIREMENTS AND FUTURE PLANS FOR IMPLEMENTING THEM
5. OUTCOME PRESENTATION AT THIRD ANIMP CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE AND ECI AUTUMN FORUM: “PUSHING THE LIMITS OF ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION”
6. FINAL REPORT OF TASK FORCE ACTIVITIES AND RESULTS
THIRD ANIMP CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE & ECI AUTUMN FORUM
Milan. Italy, october 12, 2012
PUSHING THE LIMITS OF ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION
5
1. AS IT IS: STATUS OF THE 3DM FRAMEWORK AT TIME NOW
1. PANEL RESULTS
2. AS EXPECTED TO BE
1. THREE THEMES DEEMED WORTHY FOR DEEP INVESTIGATION
1. THEME 1: MULTI-DISCIPLINARY FEASIBILITY STUDY
2. THEME 2: 4D MODEL
3. THEME 3: MECHANICAL COMPLETION
3. FEEDBACKS FROM SOFTWARE HOUSES
4. CONCLUSIONS
SUMMARY
THIRD ANIMP CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE & ECI AUTUMN FORUM
Milan. Italy, october 12, 2012
PUSHING THE LIMITS OF ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION
6
IN GENERAL
3DM IN COSTRUCTION IS STILL CONSIDERED BY SITE MAINLY A POWERFUL VISUAL TOOL TO DISPLAY THE PLANT BEFORE ERECTION, IN ORDER TO «UNDERSTAND» THE PLANT AND DETECT ERECTION ISSUES
IN ADDITION
SOME EPC CONTRACTORS EXPERIENCED SPECIFIC TASKS (NOT AS COMMON PRACTICE BUT IMPLEMENTED FOR SINGLE SPECIFIC PROJECT):
• 4D ERECTION SEQUENCE VISUALIZATION
• PIPING AND STEEL STRUCTURES FESEABILITY VISUALIZATION THROUGH STATUS COLOR COODING
• LASER SCANNING AND VISUAL REPRESENTATION OF PLANT FOR REVAMPING
• PIPING ARRANGEMENTS EXTRACTED AT SITE THROUGH 3D MODEL COMMERCIAL SIDE APPLICATION
AS IT IS: STATUS OF THE 3DM FRAMEWORK AT TIME NOW (1/5)
3DM RELATED TOOLS IN USE BY EPC CONTRACTORS AT SITE
THIRD ANIMP CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE & ECI AUTUMN FORUM
Milan. Italy, october 12, 2012
PUSHING THE LIMITS OF ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION
7
PANEL OF INTERVIEWED NUMBER OF QUESTIONNAIRES SUBMITTED: 100
NUMBER OF QUESTIONNAIRES RECEIVED: 75
AS IT IS: STATUS OF THE 3DM FRAMEWORK AT TIME NOW (2/5)
89,3%
10,7%
Firm Tipology EPC Contractor
ConstructionSubcontractor
9,3%
64,0%
13,3%
13,3%
Job Tipology Project Manager
Constr./Site Manager
Manager ConstructionDept.
Other
49,3%
21,3%
18,7%
10,7%
Experience in the EPC Sector > 20 years
between 10 e 20 years
between 5 e 10 years
< 5 years
34,7%
22,7%
26,7%
16,0%
Experience on site > 20 years
between 10 e 20 years
between 5 e 10 years
< 5 years
THIRD ANIMP CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE & ECI AUTUMN FORUM
Milan. Italy, october 12, 2012
PUSHING THE LIMITS OF ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION
8
AS IT IS: STATUS OF THE 3DM FRAMEWORK AT TIME NOW (3/5)
51,0%
10,0%
38,0%
How much the construction team is involved in reviewing the 3DM
development
Most of time
Sometimes
Rarely
Never
25,7%
10,0%
60,0%
How important is the 3DM adoption in different construction projects
Necessay for all projects
Necessay for largeprojects
Useful for every project
Useful for some project(e.g. revamping projects,modulear ones, etc.)Low with respect thetraditional methodology
Other
THIRD ANIMP CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE & ECI AUTUMN FORUM
Milan. Italy, october 12, 2012
PUSHING THE LIMITS OF ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION
9
AS IT IS: STATUS OF THE 3DM FRAMEWORK AT TIME NOW (4/5)
44,4%
31,9%
6,9%
6,9%
9,7%
Reasons limiting 3DM effectiveness at site
Weak dissemination of 3DM potential from homeoffice to site
Availability of 3DM specialists able to satisfy theconstruction supervision requests
No previous use of 3DM at site
Effectiveness has never been affected
Other
THIRD ANIMP CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE & ECI AUTUMN FORUM
Milan. Italy, october 12, 2012
PUSHING THE LIMITS OF ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION
10
AS IT IS: STATUS OF THE 3DM FRAMEWORK AT TIME NOW (5/5)
22%
17%
18%
14%
7%
6%
6%
47%
39%
30%
23%
32%
20%
29%
20%
14%
9%
11%
7%
6%
18%
24%
21%
32%
25%
35%
21%
25%
14%
23%
16%
8%
6%
7%
6%
11%
11%
14%
15%
23%
13%
24%
33%
26%
27%
30%
36%
28%
7%
8%
20%
16%
20%
21%
32%
25%
36%
43%
46%
52%
51%
63%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Check of erection interferences
Erection studies for specific equipment
Lifting studies (for heavy and critical items)
Constructability analysis at the beginning of the project
Construction drawings issue at site (piping arrangements, …
Follow up of constructability analysis
Visualization of Isometric Spools
Planning and monitoring of work fronts
Construction progress and reporting activities
Construction development in time (4D Model)
Mechanical completions
Supporting material management
Supporting quality control
Supporting site works accounting
Task Supported nowadays by the use of 3DM
Always
Most times
Sometimes
Rarely
Never
THIRD ANIMP CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE & ECI AUTUMN FORUM
Milan. Italy, october 12, 2012
PUSHING THE LIMITS OF ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION
11
AS EXPECTED TO BE (1/9)
36%
33%
24%
4% 3%
Effectiveness of 3DM as core tool of construction information system
High
High, if the 3DM is properly interfaced with themanagment system of contractors
High if the systems is managed by the maincontractor
Low because of the integration complexity
None
THIRD ANIMP CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE & ECI AUTUMN FORUM
Milan. Italy, october 12, 2012
PUSHING THE LIMITS OF ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION
12
AS EXPECTED TO BE (2/9)
52%
37%
31%
30%
24%
27%
27%
14%
17%
20%
11%
10%
8%
20%
24%
32%
31%
30%
21%
27%
28%
21%
15%
20%
18%
13%
17%
17%
21%
17%
19%
20%
14%
23%
24%
20%
23%
14%
23%
10%
14%
6%
11%
17%
17%
10%
15%
15%
23%
18%
15%
20%
3%
3%
3%
6%
9%
10%
10%
11%
14%
14%
23%
17%
4%
4%
7%
1%
4%
4%
7%
10%
10%
3%
6%
3%
6%
8%
7%
4%
7%
10%
10%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Check of erection interferences
Erection studies for specific equipment
Planning and monitoring of work fronts
Construction development in time (4D Model)
Follow up of constructability analysis
Lifting studies (for heavy and critical items)
Supporting material management
Construction progress and reporting activities
Mechanical completions
Visualization of Isometric Spools
Construction drawings issue at site (piping arrangements, …
Supporting quality control
Supporting site works accounting
Potential benefits on construction site
7 High Potential
6
5
4
3
2
1 Low Potential
THIRD ANIMP CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE & ECI AUTUMN FORUM
Milan. Italy, october 12, 2012
PUSHING THE LIMITS OF ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION
13
AS IT IS VS. AS EXPECTED TO BE (3/9)
THIRD ANIMP CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE & ECI AUTUMN FORUM
Milan. Italy, october 12, 2012
PUSHING THE LIMITS OF ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION
14
1. FEASIBILITY: 3DMODEL USE FOR PLANNING AND TRACKING THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR WORKFRONTS , BASED ON WHAT ALREADY INSTALLED, ON THE ERECTION SEQUENCE AND ON DELIVERABLES (MATERIALS AND DRAWINGS)
2. 4D MODEL: 3DMODEL USE IN RELATION WITH ERECTION PLANNING AND SEQUENCES, INCLUDING PHYSICAL PROGRESS DISPLAY.
3. MECHANICAL COMPLETION: 3DMODEL AS SUPPORT FOR MECHANICAL COMPLETION SYSTEM INPUT (COMPONENT TAGGING /SYSTEM ATTRIBUTION) AND FOR VISUAL REPRESENTATION OF MECHANICAL COMPLETION STATUS (CERTIFICATION) OF THE PLANT.
THREE THEMES DEEMED WORTHY FOR DEEPER INVESTIGATION
AS EXPECTED TO BE (4/9)
THIRD ANIMP CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE & ECI AUTUMN FORUM
Milan. Italy, october 12, 2012
PUSHING THE LIMITS OF ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION
15
MULTI-DISCIPLINARY FEASIBILITY: IT AIMS TO CONSIDER ALL THE COMPLEX RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN
DISCIPLINES, MATERIALS, DRAWINGS IN ORDER TO GIVE INFORMATION REGARDING POSSIBLE WORKFRONTS IN A FUTURE PHASE OF THE PROJECT
MULTI-DISCIPLINARY FEASIBILITY STUDY (1/2)
FEASIBILITY
ENG. DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS
MATERIAL AT SITE SITE CONDITIONS
ALL AVAILABLE
WORK FRONT NOT AVAILABLE
OK
NO
CONSTRUCTION PREDECESSOR/S
WORK FRONT AVAILABLE
Mono-disciplinary
feasibility
Multi-disciplinary feasibility
AS EXPECTED TO BE (5/9)
THIRD ANIMP CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE & ECI AUTUMN FORUM
Milan. Italy, october 12, 2012
PUSHING THE LIMITS OF ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION
16
AS EXPECTED TO BE (6/9)
MULTI-DISCIPLINARY FEASIBILITY STUDY (1/2)
48,6%
45,7%
4,3%
Benefits of multi-disciplinary feasibility implemented in the 3DM
High benefits
Useful (3DM can provide at least the theoreticalfeasibility)
Low benefits (3DM can't include all site conditionsaffecting the multi-disciplinary feasibility analysis)
No benefits
THIRD ANIMP CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE & ECI AUTUMN FORUM
Milan. Italy, october 12, 2012
PUSHING THE LIMITS OF ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION
17
KEY BENEFITS:
• CONSTRUCTABILITY (ERECTION SEQUENCE SIMULATION)
• VIEW OF THE ACTUAL PROGRESS VS THE PLANNED ONE
• CROSS CHECK SCHEDULE VS FEASIBILITY
• REPORTING TO THE CLIENT
4D SIMULATION, BY LINKING THE 3D MODEL TO THE TIME DIMENSION, PROVIDE A MEAN FOR ORGANIZING AND DISPLAY INFORMATION RELATED TO CONSTRUCTION DEVELOPMENT (PLANNED, PROGRESS, FABRICATED, ERECTED, MATERIAL AVAILABLE, PLANT COMPLETION…) IN A EASILY INTELLIGIBLE WAY, FACILITATING ITS INTERPRETATION.
4D MODEL
AS EXPECTED TO BE (7/9)
THIRD ANIMP CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE & ECI AUTUMN FORUM
Milan. Italy, october 12, 2012
PUSHING THE LIMITS OF ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION
18
MECHANICAL COMPLETION (1/2)
SCOPE: SUPPORTING ACTIVITIES OF • CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION MANAGEMENT
• PRECOMMISSIONING/COMMISSIONING COMPLETION MANAGEMENT
• PUNCH LIST MANAGEMENT
MECHANICAL COMPLETION & 3DMODEL • 3D MODEL SUPPORT FOR MECHANICAL COMPLETION DATABASE TAGGING AND POPULATION
• TEST PACK EXTRACTION TROUGH DEFINITION OF THE BATTERY LIMITS DIRECTLY INTO THE 3DM
• MULTIDISCIPLINARY COMPLETION STATUS (FOR ALL DISCIPLINES TROUGH SUITABLE COLOR CODING)
• PUNCH LIST MANAGEMENT (THROUGH DIRECT PUNCHED ITEMS INPUT IN THE 3DM)
• MECHANICAL COMPLETION DOSSIER (THROUGH FINAL EXTRACTION FROM 3DM SYSTEM DATABASE)
AS EXPECTED TO BE (8/9)
THIRD ANIMP CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE & ECI AUTUMN FORUM
Milan. Italy, october 12, 2012
PUSHING THE LIMITS OF ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION
19
MECHANICAL COMPLETION (2/2)
30%
26%
21%
22%
14%
13%
59%
54%
50%
45%
47%
47%
7%
16%
24%
29%
31%
31%
4%
4%
4%
4%
7%
9%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Show the completion status
Report to the client the completion status
Optimize the handover of areas/systems (from constructionto precommissioning/commissioning)
Optimize the handover of areas/systems to the client
Optimize the safety management during theprecommissioning/commissioning activities
Optimize the management of theprecommissioning/commissioning activities
Advantages of 3DM support or mechanical completion
Really useful
Useful
Low usefulness
Useless
AS EXPECTED TO BE (9/9)
THIRD ANIMP CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE & ECI AUTUMN FORUM
Milan. Italy, october 12, 2012
PUSHING THE LIMITS OF ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION
20
•CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE (CMS) AS POWERFUL CENTRAL INFORMATION SYSTEM FOR ENGINEERING DATA THROUGH 3D VISUALIZATION
•CMS ORIENTED TO NORTH AMERICAN CONSTRUCTION APPROACH
•3 FOCUS ARISEN FROM TASKFORCE ANALYSIS NOT NATIVELY SUPPORTED
•OTHER REQUIREMENTS PARTLY FULFILLED
•STARTED INTEGRATION WITH NEW MOBILE TECHNOLOGIES TO MEET SITE PORTABILITY REQUIREMENTS
FEEDBACK FROM SOFTWARE HOUSES
THIRD ANIMP CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE & ECI AUTUMN FORUM
Milan. Italy, october 12, 2012
PUSHING THE LIMITS OF ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION
21
CONCLUSION (1/2)
•POTENTIAL OF 3DM APPLIED TO CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES IS RECOGNIZED BY FINAL USER ALSO (THE SITE) AS VERY HIGH
•SOFTWARE HOUSES REALIZED THIS POTENTIAL AND APPROACHED THIS ISSUE WITH HORIZONTAL PLATFORMS TO BE INTERFACED TO EACH SINGLE EPC CONTRACTORS SYSTEMS
•IN TASKFORCE OPINION, THIS “HORIZONTAL” APPROACH RISKS TO LEAVE PART OF THE POTENTIAL UNEXPLORED
•EPC CONTRACTORS HAVE VERY SIMILAR OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES SO THAT…
•…SOFTWARE HOUSES HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO IMPLEMENT VERTICAL COMMON SOLUTIONS INTO THEIR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE, VALID FOR ALL EPC CONTRACTOR WITH VERY SMALL CUSTOMIZATIONS
THIRD ANIMP CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE & ECI AUTUMN FORUM
Milan. Italy, october 12, 2012
PUSHING THE LIMITS OF ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION
22
CONCLUSION (2/2)
STEPS FORWARD FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT: WHAT NEXT?
•FURTHER STEPS POSSIBLE IF SOFTWARE HOUSES WILL DEEM WORTHY FOR THEIR BUSINESS TO WORK TOGETHER WITH EPC CONTRACTORS IN DEVELOPING FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND ENHANCE THEIR CONSTRUCTION PLATFORMS WITH THE OUTCOME OF THIS JOINT ANALYSIS
•AS ALTERNATIVE, SOFTWARE HOUSES COULD UTILIZE THESE RESULTS FOR SCOUTING THE MARKET FOR VERTICAL SOLUTIONS, IN ORDER TO NATIVELY INTERFACE THEIR OWN CMS
•BOTH WAYS OF PROCEEDING WOULD GUARANTEE MUTUAL BENEFIT FOR SOFTWARE HOUSE AND EPC CONTRACTORS
THIRD ANIMP CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE & ECI AUTUMN FORUM
Milan. Italy, october 12, 2012
PUSHING THE LIMITS OF ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION
23
THANK YOU!
3D MODELING AS SUPPORT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES:
STEPS FORWARD FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
THIRD ANIMP CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE & ECI AUTUMN FORUM
Milan. Italy, october 12, 2012
PUSHING THE LIMITS OF ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION
24
AS IT IS VS. AS EXPECTED TO BE (2/9)
13 a
THIRD ANIMP CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE & ECI AUTUMN FORUM
Milan. Italy, october 12, 2012
PUSHING THE LIMITS OF ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION
25
AS IT IS VS. AS EXPECTED TO BE (2/9)
13 b
THIRD ANIMP CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE & ECI AUTUMN FORUM
Milan. Italy, october 12, 2012
PUSHING THE LIMITS OF ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION
26
AS IT IS VS. AS EXPECTED TO BE (2/9)
13 c
THIRD ANIMP CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE & ECI AUTUMN FORUM
Milan. Italy, october 12, 2012
PUSHING THE LIMITS OF ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION
27
1. DOCUMENTAL SUPPORTS AT CONSTRUCTION SITE THROUGH THE USE OF 3DM (E.G. PIPING ARRANGEMENTS); INCLUDING A MANAGEMENT TOOL FOR CERTIFYING THE DOCUMENTS ISSUE REVISIONS
2. NECESSITY OF EXPERIENCED PEOPLE IN USING THE 3DM SOFTWARE; AND WHERE THESE ARE COLLOCATED WITHIN CONSTRUCTION STAKEHOLDERS
3. CLIENTS REQUESTS ON 3DM ADOPTION BY THE EPC CONTRACTOR (ESPECIALLY IN TERMS OF HANDOVER AND FINAL DOCUMENTATION)
4. INTERFACE BETWEEN 3MD AND CONSTRUCTION (I.E. CONSIDERING DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES: SPOOLS DEFINITION, QUALITY CONTROL, MATERIAL FLOW, PROJECT PROGRESS DEVELOPMENT, SITE WORKS ACCOUNTING, MECHANICAL COMPLETION, PRODUCTION OF METHOD STATEMENTS)
5. 3DM AND MODULARIZATION
6. FEASIBILITY: 3DMODEL USE FOR PLANNING AND TRACKING THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR WORKFRONTS , BASED ON WHAT ALREADY INSTALLED, ON THE ERECTION SEQUENCE AND ON DELIVERABLES (MATERIALS AND DRAWINGS)
7. 3DM AS CONSTRUCTABILITY TOOL
8. ENDORSEMENT OF LIFTING STUDIES IN 3DM
9. 4D MODEL: 3DMODEL USE IN RELATION WITH ERECTION PLANNING AND SEQUENCES, INCLUDING PHYSICAL PROGRESS DISPLAY
10. MECHANICAL COMPLETION: 3DMODEL AS SUPPORT FOR MECHANICAL COMPLETION SYSTEM INPUT (COMPONENT TAGGING /SYSTEM ATTRIBUTION) AND FOR VISUAL REPRESENTATION OF MECHANICAL COMPLETION STATUS (CERTIFICATION) OF THE PLANT.
10 SELECTED THEMES FOR DISCUSSION ON FUTURE DEVELOPMENT