21-06-0524-01-0000 1
• IEEE 802.21 MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER
• DCN: 21-06-0524-00-0000
• Title: Effects of IEEE 802.16 link parameters and handover performance for select scenarios.
• Date Submitted: February 10, 2006
• Presented at IEEE 802.21 session # 13 in Denver Colorado
• Authors or Source(s): Richard Rouil and Nada Golmie
• Abstract: This document discusses the layer 2 trigger generation in 802.16 access networks and their impact on the handover performance. In addition, simulation results for realistic handover scenarios within 802.16 cells and between 802.16 cells and 802.11 hot spots are presented.
21-06-0524-01-0000 2
IEEE 802.21 presentation release statements
• This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE 802.21 Working Group. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.
• This is a contribution by the National Institute of Standards and Technology and is not subject to copyright in the US. The contributors do not have the authority to override the NIST policy in favor of the IEEE 802.21 policy.
• The contributor is familiar with IEEE patent policy, as outlined in Section 6.3 of the IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual <http://standards.ieee.org/guides/opman/sect6.html#6.3> and in Understanding Patent Issues During IEEE Standards Development http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/guide.html>
21-06-0524-01-0000 3
Motivation and objectives
1. Understand how link triggers are generated in 802.16 and evaluate their effects on the overall handover performance.
2. Measure the handover performance for realistic scenarios:
• Within two 802.16 cells• Between an 802.16 cell and 802.11 hot spot.
21-06-0524-01-0000 4
IEEE 802.16 implementation
• A model of IEEE 802.16 has been developed using ns-2
• To date this implementation contains the following key features:
• OFDM physical layer with support for different modulations• TDD• Mac layer implements synchronization messages• Round Robin scheduler• Supports bidirectional flows (without QoS)• Fragmentation/Reassembly• Mobility extension (IEEE 802.16e) for scanning and handoff
without association.• Integrated in the IEEE 802.21 model
21-06-0524-01-0000 5
Link layer trigger generation
802.16 access network
Link Detected upon reception of DL_MAP message from BS
Link Up upon successful registration with BS
Link Down after loosing synchronization with BS
Link Going Down due to signal power degradation
MN
21-06-0524-01-0000 6
IEEE 802.16 message exchange sequencenetwork entry
MN BS
Channel Selection
Normal operation
DL_MAP (Downlink map)
Link Detected
DCD (Downlink Channel Descriptor)
Ranging request
Link UP
UCD (Uplink Channel Descriptor)
UL_MAP (Uplink map)
Downlink synchronization
Uplink synchronization
Ranging responseInitial ranging
Registration request
Registration responseRegistration
• The DL_MAP and UL_MAP messages contain the burst allocation decided by the BS .
• The DCD and UCD messages contain burst profiles. They are periodically generated by the BS. The standard defines the maximum interval between two messages to 10 seconds.
21-06-0524-01-0000 7
Link Detected trigger
• The MN needs to listen to the channel in order to find a BS: 1. Select a channel2. Listen for a preamble message 3. If a preamble is found
• Wait for DL_MAP message• If DL_MAP message trigger link detected• Else goto 1 after timeout
4. Else goto step 1.
• In the simulation implementation, DL_MAP messages are sent in every frame and the timeout for the DL_MAP message is set to 50 ms.
Minimum time is 2 frames (8ms)
Maximum time is 10s
21-06-0524-01-0000 8
Link UP trigger: synchronizationsimulation results
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 2 4 6 8 10
Syn
chro
niz
atio
n la
ten
cy (
S)
DCD interval (s)
Effect of varying DCD and UCD interval on synchronization latency
UCD interval=1sUCD interval=2sUCD interval=5s
UCD interval=10s
DCD and UCD messages synchronized (I.e located in the same frame)
The delay contributed by the synchronization component is the most significant (order of magnitude is in seconds!!!)
when both UCD and DCD are synchronized, the delay between the downlink and the uplink synchronization is minimized.
21-06-0524-01-0000 9
Link UP trigger: initial rangingmessage sequence
• To execute Initial Ranging with the BS, the MN picks a backoff window (parameter described in the UCD message) and waits for contention opportunities in the frames. It decrements the backoff at each contention opportunity and sends a ranging request when it reaches 0.
• The BS sends a ranging response containing the status information of the transmission parameters received.
• The layer 2 parameters affecting the ranging process are:• The number of contention opportunities in a frame• The window size of the backoff
• The BS is responsible for assigning contention opportunities and a backoff window size so that a response to a successful transmission will be sent within 200 ms (T3 timeout).
21-06-0524-01-0000 10
Link UP trigger: initial rangingsimulation results
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Ra
ng
ing
late
ncy
(s)
Number of initial ranging opportunities per frame
Effect of the number of initial ranging opportunities on the ranging latency
backoff window size=2backoff window size=4backoff window size=6
21-06-0524-01-0000 11
Link UP trigger: registrationmessage sequence
• The registration allows the MN to connect to the BS and enter the network.
• A scheduler assigning uplink transmission opportunities to MNs in a round robin fashion is used in the simulation.
• When a new MN arrives, it is assigned to the end of the scheduling list (FIFO).
• According to the IEEE 802.16 standard, the registration step is completed within a maximum interval of 3s before having to repeat it or aborting.
21-06-0524-01-0000 12
Link UP trigger: registrationSimulation results
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0 5 10 15 20
La
ten
cy (
s)
Number of STA in the cell
Effect of the number of STA in an 802.16 cell using a FIFO Round Robin Scheduling
21-06-0524-01-0000 13
Link UP trigger: results summary
Link Up step Layer 2 parameters Latency range (s)
Downlink and uplink synchronization
-DCD interval
-UCD interval
0.2-10
Initial ranging -Backoff window size
-Number of ranging opportunities per frame
0.005-0.110
Registration -Transmission opportunity allocation
0.005-0.080
To speed up network entry, the time to acquire the downlink and complete the uplink synchronization must be reduced
21-06-0524-01-0000 14
Link Going Down trigger
• The link Going Down trigger predicts that the MN will be leaving the coverage area within a certain period of time.
• The generation of this trigger is based on a measurement algorithm used (instantaneous value, weighted average, etc) of link layer performance parameters: Carrier-to-Interference-and-Noise Ratio (CINR), Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI), or MAC delay.
21-06-0524-01-0000 15
Link Down trigger: link layer parameters that effect performance
• A MN expects to receive DL_MAP and UL_MAP messages at short intervals. The standard defines a timeout with a maximum value of 600ms. If the timeout expires, the MN considers that the synchronization with the BS is lost.
• Other timeout exists for messages such as DCD and UCD but their magnitude is in seconds (default value is 5*interval).
• At the BS, when a MN is assigned bandwidth, it is required to send messages even if there is no data to send. The base station can then monitor that the MN is responding to messages and can decide when it is considered out of the network.
21-06-0524-01-0000 16
Performance evaluation of handovers scenarios
Simulation Parameters• Neighbor Discovery
• RA interval: U[200s,600s]• Max delay between RA: 0.5s• Router lifetime: 1800s
• Application traffic• UDP CN → MN
• Video streaming (396.8kbps, 4pkt/100ms, 1240 bytes)
• Delay between CN and MN: 90ms RTT + Mac access delay (depends on the technology used)
60ms RTT
CN
AR
WLAN AP Wimax BS
30ms RTT 30ms RTT
21-06-0524-01-0000 17
Simulation parameters (cont.)
• IEEE 802.16 parameters• Coverage: 1 km radius• DCD/UCD interval: 5s• Frame duration: 4ms• Contention opportunity per frame: 5• Backoff window size start for contention: 2• Scanning: duration=250 frames, interleaving=40 frames, iteration=5
• IEEE 802.11 parameters• Coverage: 20 m radius• Beacon interval: 100ms• Scanning mode: passive
21-06-0524-01-0000 18
Handover between two 802.16 networks:scenario 1
CN802.16 BS 802.16 BS
Handover
MN
21-06-0524-01-0000 19
Scenario 1 description
We evaluate two types of handover mechanisms in 802.16:
• Using Link Down trigger, the MN will first detect the loss of synchronization with the serving BS before starting to look for another station.
• Using Link Going Down trigger, the MN will request the serving BS to allocate time for scanning. After the scanning is over, the MN will handover to the target BS. We identify two additional cases:
1. At the time of handover, the MN receiving the DL_MAP and UL_MAP cannot decode the messages because the information received during the scanning expired or has changed. The MN is required to perform full downlink and uplink synchronization (full network entry)
2. During handover, the MN can decode the DL_MAP and UL_MAP received by the target BS using the DCD and UCD information collected during the scanning period. In this case, the MN can execute faster network entry (partial network entry)
21-06-0524-01-0000 20
Layer 3 Handover process
MN BS CN
Layer 2 handover
New prefix detected
Normal operation
Flow redirection
Link UP RS
RA
Flow redirection ACK
21-06-0524-01-0000 21
Handover 802.16-802.16 using Link DownMN Serving BS Target BS
Normal operation
MN leaves the Coverage area
Link Down
Link down detection
Normal operation
Listen to channels
DL_MAP
Link DetectedSynchronization messages (DCD, UCD, UL_MAP)
Ranging
RegistrationLink UP
Handoverlatency
Layer 3 handover
21-06-0524-01-0000 22
Handover 802.16-802.16 using Link Going Down
MN Serving BS Target BSNormal operation
Link Going Down
Normal operation
Listen to channels
Synchronization messages (DL_MAP,DCD, UCD, UL_MAP)
Link Handoff Imminent
MOB-SCN_REQ
MOB-SCN_RSP
Scanning
Normal mode
Repeat scanning and normal mode intervals
MOB-SCN_REP
MOB-MSHO_REQ
MOB-MSHO_RSP
Link Handoff Proceeding
Synchronization messages (DL_MAP,DCD, UCD, UL_MAP)
Switch channel
Ranging and Registration
Link Handoff Complete
Full or Partial network entry
MOB-MSHO_IND
HandoverLatency
Layer 3 handover
Layer 2 latency
Layer 3 latency
21-06-0524-01-0000 23
Handover 802.16-802.16: results
Link Down Link Going Down + full network entry
Link Going Down + partial network entry
Layer 2 handover latency (s) 2.864 2.639 0.220
Layer 3 handover latency (s) 0.387 0.390 0.386
Total handover latency (s) 3.25 3.029 0.606
Packet loss 129.8 124.6 27.68
Using Link Going Down shows major improvements if the information contained in the DCD and UCD messages acquired during scanning can be used to decode the DL_MAP and UL_MAP during the handover.Additional improvements can be made if the BSs synchronize over the backbone (work in progress).
21-06-0524-01-0000 24
Handover between 802.11 and 802.16:scenario 2
802.16 BS
802.11 AP
CN
MN
21-06-0524-01-0000 25
Scenario 2 description
• In this scenario, we study the vertical handover between 2 wireless technologies: 802.11 and 802.16
• A MN that is connected to 802.16 enters a hotspot. For cost and bandwidth performance, the MN executes a vertical handover to the 802.11 network. When leaving the cell, the MN reconnects to the 802.16 network.
• The MN uses the link Going Down trigger on the 802.11 interface.
21-06-0524-01-0000 26
Handover 802.11-802.16: entering WLAN
802.16 BS 802.11 APMN802.16
interface802.11
interface
Normal operation
BeaconLink Detected
Normal operation
Association Response
Link UP
Association Request
Layer 3 handover
Keep interface onor
shutdown interface
21-06-0524-01-0000 27
Handover 802.11-802.16: leaving WLAN
802.11 AP 802.16 BSMN802.11
interface802.16
interface
Normal operation
DL_MAPLink Detected
Normal operation
Ranging request
Link UP
Synchronization messages
Layer 3 handover
Performed if802.16 interface was turned off
Ranging response
Registration request
Registration response
Keep interface onor
shutdown interface
21-06-0524-01-0000 28
Handover 802.11-802.16: simulation results
Interface 802.16 is always turned on, redirect on Link Down
Interface 802.16 always turned on, redirect on Link Going Down
Interface 802.16 activated upon Link Down of interface 802.11
Interface 802.16 activated upon Link Going Down of interface 802.11
Handover 802.16-802.11
latency (s)
0.368 0.364 0.368 0.364
Handover 802.11-802.16 latency (s)
0.397 0.097 3.08 2.917
Packet loss for 802.11-802.16 handover
13.98 0 137.3 0-137
Handover 802.16-802.11: • starts at detection of 802.11 (Link Detected)• RS/RA on 802.11 (average around 250ms, due to a random back to reply to RS U[0,500ms]• message redirection to CN (90ms+medium access)Handover 802.11-802.16:• Starts on link Down (+300ms for loosing 3 beacons) or link Going Down• If 802.16 is OFF, synchronization with BS (2.5s with DCD/UCD interval of 5s)• message redirection to CN (90ms_medium access)
21-06-0524-01-0000 29
Handover 802.11-802.16: a closer look at link going down
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 2 4 6 8 10
Pac
ket l
oss
Distance from hot spot boundary at the time of link going down event generation (m)
Effect of link going down anticipation on packet loss
Velocity: 1m/sVelocity: 2m/sVelocity: 3m/sVelocity: 4m/s
21-06-0524-01-0000 30
Handover 802.11-802.16: results summary
• We note that even when the MN is using the Link Going Down trigger on the 802.11 interface, the network entry latency for 802.16 is still significant.
• Adjusting the link Going Down threshold to allow enough time to perform full network entry in 802.16 would require the MN to trigger an event while the connectivity to the 802.11 AP is still good.
• Some potential solutions to optimize the handover between 802.11 and 802.16 include:
• Keep the 802.16 interface on• Use sleep mode• Speed up the network entry by providing heterogeneous
information through the 802.11 interface (Information Service)
21-06-0524-01-0000 31
Summary
• 802.16 synchronization phase plays a key role in the handover latency:
• Any prior knowledge for synchronization (channel descriptor messages) is critical in speeding up the handover.
• Reducing the synchronization time by increasing the frequency of the channel descriptor messages comes generally at the cost of a higher bandwidth overhead (less bandwidth available for user traffic).
• Keeping the 802.16 interface turned on is beneficial at the cost of additional power consumption and reduced battery life.
• The use of 802.16e mechanisms including neighbor advertisement, BS synchronization, and sleep mode may prove to be helpful.