Www.compaq.com Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratory Feline: Fast, Elliptical Lines for Anisotropic Texture Mapping Joel McCormack, Ronald.

www.compaq.com Mitsubishi ElectricResearch Laboratory

www.merl.com

Feline: Fast, Elliptical Feline: Fast, Elliptical Lines for Anisotropic Lines for Anisotropic Texture MappingTexture Mapping

Joel McCormack, Ronald Perry, Joel McCormack, Ronald Perry, Keith I. Farkas, and Norman P. Keith I. Farkas, and Norman P. JouppiJouppi


www.merl.com

OutlineOutlineWhat should texture mapping really do?Previous workOur work: Simple FelineImage galleryConclusions


www.merl.com

An Intuitive Diagram of An Intuitive Diagram of Texture Mapping (stolen Texture Mapping (stolen from Landsdale)from Landsdale)

Pixel filter is a window with variable transparency

Filter weight at a point is degree of transparency

A circular window views an elliptical texture area

Adjacent filters overlap


www.merl.com

Heckbert & Greene’s Heckbert & Greene’s Elliptical Weighted Average Elliptical Weighted Average (EWA)(EWA)

0.000

0.005

0.010

0.015

0.020

0.025

0.030

0.035

SampleWeight

u axis

v axis0.000

0.005

0.010

0.015

0.020

0.025

0.030

0.035

u axis

v axis

Assume perspective distortion is constant near pixel (99.9% true)

Back mapping to screen space is a biquadraticPerspective Warp Affine Warp


www.merl.com

EWA Texturing ExamplesEWA Texturing Examples

Few & faint Moiré artifacts

Nice definition to text without jaggies


www.merl.com

Lance Williams’ Mip-Lance Williams’ Mip-mapping with Trilinear mapping with Trilinear FilteringFiltering

Trilinear filter has (very) roughly circular contour lines, with a square footprint

0.000

0.005

0.010

0.015

0.020

0.025

0.030

0.035

u axis

v axis0.000

0.005

0.010

0.015

0.020

0.025

0.030

0.035

SampleWeight

u axis

v axis

Affine Warp Trilinear Filter


www.merl.com

Trilinear Texturing Trilinear Texturing ExamplesExamples

Ellipticalfootprint

Trilinearfootprint

Ellipticalfootprint

Trilinearfootprint


www.merl.com

0.0000.0050.0100.0150.020

0.025

0.030

0.035

0.040

0.045

u axis

v axis

Texram (Best Case) Texram (Best Case) 2n trilinear probes along ellipse’s “major axis”Resulting filter is too short and mesa-like at best...

0.000

0.005

0.010

0.015

0.020

0.025

0.030

0.035

SampleWeight

u axis

v axis

Affine WarpTexram (best case)


www.merl.com

0.0000.0050.0100.0150.020

0.025

0.030

0.035

0.040

0.045

u axis

v axis

Texram (Worst Case) Texram (Worst Case) … and jaggedly peaked at worst.

0.000

0.005

0.010

0.015

0.020

0.025

0.030

0.035

SampleWeight

u axis

v axis

Affine WarpTexram (worst case)


www.merl.com

Texram Texturing ExamplesTexram Texturing Examples

Lots of swimming Moiré artifacts

Sharp text but with jaggies (aliasing)


www.merl.com

Exact Feline: Use Ellipse Exact Feline: Use Ellipse ParametersParameters

n probes, Gaussian weighted, on major axis of ellipseImportant Texram problems fixedBut expensive setup comparable to EWA!

0.000

0.005

0.010

0.015

0.020

0.025

0.030

0.035

SampleWeight

u axis

v axis

Affine Warp

0.000

0.005

0.010

0.015

0.020

0.025

0.030

0.035

Exact Feline


www.merl.com

Simple Feline: Approximate Simple Feline: Approximate EllipseEllipse

Approximate ellipse axes for cheaper setupSlightly underestimates major radius, overestimates minor radius (resulting in fewer, fatter probes)

0.000

0.005

0.010

0.015

0.020

0.025

0.030

0.035

SampleWeight

u axis

v axis0.000

0.005

0.010

0.015

0.020

0.025

0.030

0.035

u axis

v axis

Affine Warp Simple Feline


www.merl.com

Simple Feline: Reducing # Simple Feline: Reducing # of Probesof Probes

Allow shortening of “major axis”Extreme sensitivity, quickly causes aliasing3% decrease

Allow widening probesCauses blurringMax of 16% (high-quality)or 31% (high-efficiency)

Allow stretching distance between probesCauses aliasingMax of 15% (high-quality) or 36% (high-efficiency)


www.merl.com

Simple Feline: Modest Simple Feline: Modest Probe ReductionProbe Reduction

Actual blur stretch of 15.6% (maximum allowed)Actual aliasing stretch of 7.0%

0.000

0.005

0.010

0.015

0.020

0.025

0.030

0.035

SampleWeight

u axis

v axis0.000

0.005

0.010

0.015

0.020

0.025

0.030

0.035

u axis

v axis

Affine Warp High-Quality Simple Feline


www.merl.com

0.000

0.005

0.010

0.015

0.020

0.025

0.030

0.035

u axis

v axis

Simple Feline: “Texram Simple Feline: “Texram Probe-Equivalent” Probe-Equivalent” ReductionReduction

Actual blur stretch of 31% (maximum allowed)Actual aliasing stretch of 26%

0.000

0.005

0.010

0.015

0.020

0.025

0.030

0.035

SampleWeight

u axis

v axis

Affine Warp High-Efficiency Simple Feline


www.merl.com

0.000

0.005

0.010

0.015

0.020

0.025

0.030

0.035

u axis

v axis

Simple Feline: “Texram Simple Feline: “Texram Probe-Equivalent” with Probe-Equivalent” with Gaussian ProbesGaussian Probes

Blur stretch of 36%Aliasing stretch of 31%

0.000

0.005

0.010

0.015

0.020

0.025

0.030

0.035

SampleWeight

u axis

v axis

Affine Warp High-Efficiency Feline w/Gaussian

Slightly blurrier, but many fewer aliasing artifacts


www.merl.com

Image Gallery: TextImage Gallery: Text

HQ Feline EWA

Trilinear Texram


www.merl.com

Image Gallery: CurvesImage Gallery: Curves

EWAHQ Feline

Trilinear Texram


www.merl.com

Image Gallery: Image Gallery: CheckerboardsCheckerboards

HQ Feline EWA

Trilinear Texram


www.merl.com

ConclusionsConclusionsFeline compared to EWA:

High-Quality Feline’s visual quality is comparable, using half the cycles/pixel and much smaller setup logic

Feline compared to Texram:High-quality images far superior, using more cycles/pixel

High-efficiency images superior, using same cycles/pixel

Feline requires a tiny fraction of the die of a PC or next-generation game console graphics accelerator

Www.compaq.com Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratory Feline: Fast, Elliptical Lines for Anisotropic Texture Mapping Joel McCormack, Ronald.

Documents