LI-z- M A - /iv TheWorld Bank FOR OFFIClAL USE ONLY Repmo No. P-6239-IN MEMORANDUM ANDRECOMMENDATION OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION TO THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS ON A PROPOSEDCREDIT IN THE AMOUNT EQUIVALENT TO SDR 33.8 MILLION TO INDIA FOR A FORESTRY RESEARCH EDUCATION AND EXTENSIONPROJECT FEBRUARY 1, 1994 MICROGRAPHICS Report No: P- 6239 IN Type: MOP This documenthas a restricted distributionand may be used bv recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its cor.ents may not otherwisebe disclosed without World Bank authorization. Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized
20
Embed
World Bank Documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/902901468257982264/pdf/multi0... · Staff Appraisal Report: No.12176-IN Maps: IMRD No. 24927 IBRD No. 24928 This document has
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
LI-z- M A - /iv
The World Bank
FOR OFFIClAL USE ONLY
Repmo No. P-6239-IN
MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE
PRESIDENT OF THE
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION
TO THE
EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS
ON A
PROPOSED CREDIT
IN THE AMOUNT EQUIVALENT TO SDR 33.8 MILLION
TO INDIA
FOR A
FORESTRY RESEARCH EDUCATION AND EXTENSION PROJECT
FEBRUARY 1, 1994
MICROGRAPHICS
Report No: P- 6239 INType: MOP
This document has a restricted distribution and may be used bv recipients only in the performance oftheir official duties. Its cor.ents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization.
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS
Currency Unit = Rupee
US$1.00 = Rs. 30
WEIGHTS AND MEASURES
The metric system is used throughout the report
FISCAL YEAR
GOI: April 1 - March 31
ABBREVIATIONS
GHNP Great Himalayan National ParkGNP Gross National ProductGOHP Government of Hiiachal PradeshGOTN Government of Tamil NaduKMTR Kalakad Mundanthurai Tiger ReserveICEFRE Indian Council for Forestry Research and EducationMOEF Ministry of Environment and ForestsNGO Non-Governmental OrganizationPA Protected AreaSDR Special Drawing RightsSFD State Forest Department
FOR OMCIAL USE ONLY
INDIA
FORESTRY RESEARCH EDUCATION AND EXTENSION PROJECT
CREDIT AND PROJECT SUMMARY
Borrower: India, Acting by its President
Executing Agendes: The Indian Council for Forestry Research and Education(ICFRE), the Ministry of Environment and Forests(MOEF) and the States of Hichal Pradesh and TamilNadu
Amount: IDA Credit of SDR 33.8 million (US$47.0 millionequivalent)
Terms: Standard with 35 years maturity
Financing Plan:
Foreig Local Total.................. .US$ miiion
IDA 22.8 24.2 47.0GOI 0.0 9.4 9.4 v/
Total 33.6 56.4
I/ Includes duties and taxes of US$3.4 milion
Economic Rate of Return: Not applicable
Poverty Category: Not applicable
Staff Appraisal Report: No.12176-IN
Maps: IMRD No. 24927IBRD No. 24928
This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performanceof their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization.
MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE PRESIDENTOF THE INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION
TO THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTORSON A PROPOSED CREDIT TO INDIA
FOR A FORESTRY RESEARCH EDUCATION AND EXTENSION PROJECT
1. I submit for your approval the following report and recommendation on aproposed development credit to India for SDR 33.8 million, the equivalent of US$47.0million, on standard IDA terms with a maturity of 35 years, to help finance a ForestryResearch Education and Extension Project.
2. Background. About 19 percent of the land area of India, or about 64 millionhectares, is covered by forests which play an important role in the conservation ofenvironmental quality. The contribution of the forestry sector to GNP has been estimated atless than two percent, but this does not take into account non-market and external benefits,illegally-harvested fuelwood and timber, nor the importance of the forests to supporting thecatde population. Most of India's forests are degraded and productivity is poor. Forestdegradation is increasing with the rising population and over-exploitation of grazing resourcesin forested areas. Government is addressing the problems of the forestry sector throughpolicy reforms, legislation and afforestaton. The National Forest Policy, revised in 1988,teats forests: first as an ecological necessity; second as a source of goods for use by localpopuladons, with particular emphasis on non-timber forest products; and third as a source ofwood and other products for industries and other non-local uses. The policy encouragesindusties to obtain raw materials from farm forestry. The Eighth Five Year Plan (1992-97)further emphasizes investments for rehabilitation of degraded forests and fann forestry.
3. Forestry research has an important contribution to make to the successfulimplementation of this policy, through the development of forest management systems andtechnologies to improve productivity and the utilization of forest products. The IndianCouncil of Forestry Research and Education (ICFRE), established in 1986, is responsible for6 Institutes and a number of research centers, undertaking research in various ecologicalzones. ICRE research supports the sector as a whole, and provides an important source ofthe improved technology required for successful implementation of IDA supported stateforestry projects. There is a well qualified cadre of research staff in India, and the StateForest Deparments, Forest Development Corporations, and the private sector, provide astrucure for the application of research results. However, forestry research is constained bythe lack of a systematic method for determining research priorities and a lack of coordinationamong the various agencies involved in research, which has sometimes meant that researchresults have not been of immediate practical application. In addition, analysis of the socialand economic implications of policies is sometimes incomplete, or has not been kept up-to-date. Other constraints have included frequent rotation of staff, inadequate investment infacilities, equipment, and library and information services, and inadequate operational researchfunding.
4. There are formal forestry education programs in a number of state agiculturaland general universities. The Forest Research Institute in Dehra Dun was recently grantedDeemed Forest University status. The major constraints to formal forestry education relate to
2
curricula that do not adequately reflect the requirements of the new forest policy, the need fora cadre of professional trainers, and a requirement for adequate facilities for post-graduateresearch. Forestry extension is primarily the responsibility of State For:stry Departments(SEDs), though some commercial companies and NGOs run successful extension programs.The focus of ICFRE's activity in extension is, therefore, the development of researchextension linkages. The main constraints to improved forestry extension services include thelack of linkages between the research institutions, the state forest services and the privatesector, lack of resources to mount effective extension campaigns, and the lack of experienceof many staff in research institutes and SFDs.
5. India has a broad range of ecosystems within ten biogeographic zones thatsupport a wide range of flora and fauna. Many species are endemic and some areendangered. A growing appreciation within India of the importance of the conservation ofbiodiversity has led to the establishment of a large number of Protectd Areas (PAs),including 75 national parks and over 400 sanctuaries. Although they are widely distributedthoughout India, they represent less than 4 percent of the total land area. Rapidly growinghuman and livestock populations impose considerable pressures on the PAs, resulting indegradation of vegetative cover and a loss of biodiversity. Past PA management, based onexclusion and policing, has not been effective in arresting degradation. Attempts are nowbeing made to involve local communities in the planning and implementation ofecodevelopment prgrams to generate altenative incomes for those dependent on PAresources and to create an awareness of the benefits of preserving the PAs.
6. Rationale for IDA Involvement and Country Assstance Strategy.Development of the forestry research system is part of a long-term stategy to improve theproductivity and sustainable use of forests. The project should be seen as part of such a long-term strategy and the Bank is one of the few institutions that could provide the necessarycontinuity of support. The Bank is also well plaed to assist in developing inks withinternational forestry research initiatives. In addition, the success of other GOI and Bankinitiatives in the forestry sector in Idia is at least partially dependent on the continuing
development of improved technologies. The Bank's support for research and development ofeffective methods for conservation of biodiversity in India, including ecodevelopmentactivities, is mandated by its strong commitment to improving environmental management.The proposed project would be consistent with the overall country assistance strategy,including the strategy for Bank assistance to the agricultural seo in India, which seeks topromote increased productivity through better selection of investments and more efficientpublic sector management. It is also consistent with the objectives of the Bank's new forestrypolicy and the Asia Region's strategy for forestry lending which link policy dialogue withmajor investments m the forest sector. Finally, the recently completed Expenditure Reviewconcluded that further investment it forestry research deserves priority,
7. Project Objectives The main objectives of the project are to strengthen thecapacity of national and state institutions to plan and underauke prinoity research programs, toimprove the system of forestry education in research and academic institutions, and toimprove the extension of research findings. Supplementary objectives are to improve thepolicy analysis and project prparation capabilities within MOEF, and develop a supportngforestry statistical service. The project would also aim to develop and test, on a pilot bads,
3
methods for conservation of biological resources in protected areas through ecodevelopment.
8. Project Description. The project would be implemented over five years andwould have five main components: (i) Research Management (US$5.8 million) based on thedevelopment of ICFRE to improve the management and coordination of forestry research andextension, through staff training, studies and 4;onsultancies to develop priority settingmethodologies and a management information system, the establishment of an extensionsupport fund, and provision of a headquarters building and equipment; (ii) Research ProgramSupport (US$37.8 million) providing necessary infrastructure, equipment and operatingexpenses for selected research programs in ICFRE institutes, the establishment of a researchgrant fund to commission research by public and private sector agencies, measures to mprovethe quality of plantng stock, human resource development through staff training, scientificreview of institutes and programs, and improvement of library and information systems andstadstical services; (iii) Foresby Educaton (US$1.8 million) involving the development andvaidation of forestry cumcula in formal education through provision of funds for review andrevision work, and development of the Deemed Forestry Univursity at Dehra Dun, primarilyby financing post-graduate research and teaching awards; (iv) Forestry Policy ndPrearation (US$2.2 million) which would strengthen capabilities within MOEF for theanalysis of forest policies and preparation of future forestry projects, through staff trainingand provision for studies and consultancies; (v) Conservaon of Blodiversil (US$5.3 million)which would support development and implementation of programs for ecodevelopment andresource management around two protected areas, the Great Hmaayan National Park(GHNP) in the State of Himachal Pradesh and the Kalakad Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve(KMTR) in the State of Tamil Nadu. Ecodevelopment would involve communities in theplanning and implementation of programs for alternative natual or soci resource creation orincome generation. Improved planning and management within the PAs, and associatedresearch and monitoring programs would also be financed.
9. The total cost of the project is estimated at US$56.4 million, with a foreignexchange component of US$22.8 million (40 percent of total project costs). The IDA creditwould be for US$47.0 milion, or 88 percent of project costs, excluding duties and taxes. Thebreakdown of costs and financing is shown in Schedule A. The proposed p ntarrangements and the disbursement schedule are given in Schedule B. A timetable of keyproject processing events and the status of Bank Group operations are given in Schedules Cand D, respectively. Maps are also attached. The Staff Appraisal Report No. 12176-IN datedFebruary 1, 1994, is being distributed separately.
10. Project Implementation. The organization of the project would be fulyintegrated with the coordination and management of forestry research, education andextension systems at national, state, research institute and program levels. ICFRE would haveoverall responsibility for management of forestry research, and the ICFRE headquarters staffwould provide project administration, procurement and disbursement services. Detailedresearch program management would be the responsibility of the Diectors of Institutes, andother agencies undertaing the research. Mass extension programs are primarily theresponsibility of the State Forestry Departments, but ICFRE institutes would provide supportand advice. ICFRE also has a role in forestry educadon, directly through the DeemedForestry University, and indirecdy through its role in curriculum development and validaton
4
of forestry degrees in universities. Policy analysis and the oganization of forestry projectprepartion would be undertaken by MOEF. Responsibility for ecodevelopment activideswould lie with MOEF and the SFDs of GOHP and GOIN. Project Steering Committees forForestry Research Education and Extension and for Conservation of Biodiversity would beestablished to ensure coordination of activities amongst the implementing agencies and thatobligatons and assurances agreed during project negotiations are met.
11. Project Sustainability. The sustainability of the project is dependent on thelong-term GOI commitment to forestry research and the conservation of biodiversity. This isevidenced by the clear recognition in the new forest policy of the role of research inimproving forest management and productivity. GO0 commitment is further reflected in theincreased budget for forestry research in 1991 and 1992. The growing awareness in India ofthe importance of biodiversity conservation is evident in government policy statements andamendments to the Wild Life Protection Act. In addition, there would be a phased increasein the GOI contribution to incremental recurrent expenditure during the project.
12. Lessons from Previous BankJIDA Involvement. There has been no Banklending specifically for forestry research in India, but there is a portfolio of projects in theforestry sector, some of which have components to support research and technologydevelopment. These components have seldom been successfully implemented, partly becausestates have not assigned priority to research within the wide range of responsibilities that theycary. For GOI and the states, this lack of commitment to research has pointed to the needfor a project with a specific focus on forestry research. A review of experienc' gained duringthe implementaton of Bank-funded forestry projects indicates the need to movw towards acomprehensive approach to the sector on a national or state-wide basis '. The reviewhighlights the need to raise the productivity of the sector, dtrough improved planting materialsand practices, a strengthened research system, and an effective forestry extension service.Experience in India with Bank support for agricultural research is also relevant and shows theneed for research policy to reflect national priorites for the sector, for improved managementof the research system and associated human resources, based on an effective managementinformation system and a sectoral human resource development plan.
13. Nor has there been Bank or IDA lending specifically for ecodevelopmentactivities in India. Recent forestry projects have included funds for the conservation ofbiodiversity, but there is litde implementation experience, as the projects have been effedvefor only a short period of time. There is experience with ecodevelopment in IltegratedConservation-Development Projects supported by the Bank and IDA in other countries. Arecent review of this experience shows that to be successful, they must form part of a largerframework that includes political support, enabling legislation, realistic insdtutionalanrangements, and compatibility with regional development. These lessons have been takeninto account in the design of the proposed project.
I India. Forest Sector Review. World Bank Report No. 10965 - IN. 1992.
5
14. Agreed Actions. During negotiations with Government, the following assurancesand agreements were obtained:
Conditon of Project Effetiveness: An institution, acceptable to IDA, to providetechnical specialists would be identified and a contract for the provision of their servicesagreed.
Conditon of Disbursement: Disbursement of funds under the Research GrantFund, the Extension Support Fund and the Ecodevelopment Support Fund would depend onthe agreement with IDA on criteria for assessing proposals for funding.
Other Asswunces. These relate to actions to ensure dmely implementation ofproject activides and amongst others include: (a) A methodology for setdng research priorideswould be developed by ICFRE, discussed with IDA and approved by the ICFRE Board ofGovernors by June 30, 1995. Drafts of the National Forestry Research Plan and associatedHuman Resources Development Plan would be completed by June 30, 1996, and agreed withIDA as part of the mid-term review no aer than February 28, 1997; (b) The fomat of theIndian Forestry Research Information System would be agreed with IDA by December 31,1994, and udlized to introduce program budgeting during FY 195-96, for prepartion of the1996-97 budget to the extent pruaicable and fully utilized for the preparadon of the FY 1997-98 budget; (c) The first three proposals for funding under the Extension Support Fund, theResearch Grant Fund, and the Ecodevelopment Support Fund would be submited to IDA forapproval; (d) Annual taining plans, acceptable to IDA, for project-financed training wouldbe prepared not later than September 30, 1994, for the first year of the project and not laterthan April 30 of each subsequent year, (e) Review of the sciendfic activities of at least twoICFRE institutes would be undertken during each year of the project based on Terms ofReference to be agreed with IDA and the recommendations of the reviews would thereafter beimplemented; (f) In consultation with IDA, the review of the curicula for forestry educationin Indian universities would be completed by June 30, 1996; (g) The posts of PA Director inboth GHNP and KMTR would be filled and staff of the Ecodevelopment Planning teams inboth PAs appointed, and responsibility for Forest Rangers and Forest Guards in theecodevelopment areas transferred to the PA Director by September 30, 1994.
15. Environmental Aspects. The project would support research programs aimed atincreasing the sustainability of the use of forest resources within different ecological zones.Project support for research into the management and conservation of these resources, throughinvolvement of communities and tribal peoples would reduce degradation, whilstimprovements to the productivity of plantings on farms, plantations and natural forests wouldreduce exploitation. Proje't support for conservation of biodiversity would have directbenefits for the selected PAs and suroundings and wider benefits, in the long term, for otherprotected areas. The project would, therefore, have beneficial effects on the envirnment.Ecodevelopment planning and implementation would be based on a participatory, micro-levelprocess. Programs would be small and site specific and it is not envisaged that they wouldinvolve resettlement or impact on tibals. They would inmorporate local communitesenvironmental concerns and agreement on the criteria for udizaion of the EcodevelopmentSupport Fund would be a condition of disbursement. The criteria would include the need forproposals to take into account Bank policies on the environment, involuntary resetdement andindigenous people.
6
16. Project Benefits. The project would support a key element of the Government'sstategy for the forestry sector as articulated in the Nadonal Forest Policy. Improvements tothe researh management system would lead to the identification of research priorities thatreflect the tequirements of that policy and the needs of the users of forest resources. Betterresearch/extension linkages and infomation flows would further wprove the relevance andquality of on-going and planmed research programs. In addition, project support for forestryeducation would lead to a cadre of forestry staff with improved capabilities to apply reseawchresults and manage forests in a sustainable manner with the active pardcipation ofcommunities. Project support for the conservation of biodiversity on a pilot basis would havelong-term future benefits by developing effective methods for involving communites in theplanning and implementaton of progams that reduce the pressures on PA resources.Associated research programs would have important benefits for the management of protectedareas as they would provide basic information on the balance between resource use andhabitat preservation. No economic rate of return has been calculated for the project as thenature of research achieven ents and rate and extent of their adoption is impossible to predictand will vary from one agro-ecological zone to another
17. Risks. The main risks affecting the project, as with many reseach projects, are:(i) that resewch findings generated may be irrelevant to the needs of users, either becausetheir needs have not been properly identified, or because changes in economic policies rendernew technologies unsuitable, that is, not economically viable; (ii) that coordination betweenresearch agencies and between those agencies and the users of rch results may not beefective and; (iii) that goverment commitment to funding research may not be sustained.The project is designed to mininize these risks through providing suprort for an improvedmethodology for settng research priorities that explicidy takes into account socio-economicfactors and involves state and private sector ganiions in deciding on priorities. There area number of ris associated with any program for the conservation of biodiversity throughecodevelopment activities as the process is not well developed and is likely to need adaptationfor specific sites. The pilot nature of project support for ecodevelopment minimizs theserisks.
18. Reconmendation. I am satisfied that the proposed credit would comply with theArticles of Agreement of the Association and recommend that the Executive Directosapprove it.
Lewis T. PrestonPresident
AttachmentsWashington, D.C.Febra 1, 1994
Schedule APa,e 1 of 1
INDIA
FORESTRY RESEARCH EDUCATION AND EXTENSION PROJECT
Estimated Cosb and Financing Plan
Estmted CostsForeign Local Toal FE
......... (US$ million) ....... %
Research ManagementA. Development of ICFRE 0.9 3.4 4.3 21B. Extension 0.3 1.2 1.5 17
Research Program SupportA. Institute Progrm Support 6.4 8.7 15.1 43B. Planting Stock Improvement 1.1 3.5 4.6 25C. Research System Support 6.7 5.7 12.4 54D. Libry and Infomation Systems 2.7 2.6 5.3 52E. Forestry Statistics 0.1 03 0.4 24
Fostry Education 0.2 1.6 1.8 13
ForesryPoLicy ad Prpation OA 1.8 2.2 16
Consevaion of BiodiversiayA. Ecodevelopment 0.3 3.0 33 10B. PA M gement 0.3 0.8 1.1 30C. Research, Monitoring and Evaluaton 0.2 0.7 0.9 21
Project prepared by: Government of India with IDAassistance
Fi-st IDA Mission: October, 1992
Appraisal Mission February, May, 1993
Negotiations: December, 1993
Planned Date of Effectiveness July, 1994
List of Relevant PPARS and PCRs: None
1/ This report is based on the findings of an apprisal mission that vidtedIndia in March, 1993, with a follow-up mission in May, 1493. Themission compised L Hill (Mission Leder), N. Jones (FostrySpecialist), P. Guhathar (Forestry Specialist), A. Pritchard (ResearchManagement Specalist), MN Jansen (Environmental Spet) and 0.Campbell (Consultant Rural Sociologist). Ms N. Mattson (FinancialAnalyst) provided support to the mission.
SCHEDULE D.... __...._ .
PAGE . of S
THE STATUS OF BANK GROUP OPERATIONS IN INDIA
A. STATEMENT OF BAN LOANS AND IDA CREDITS
(As of December 31, 1993)
USS Million(net of cancellations)
Loan/ PY of ----------------------------------Credit * Approval Purpose IBRD IDA 1/ Undisbursed 2/
Total now outstanding 13455.2 18415.6Amount Sold 133.8of which has been repaid 133.8
Total now held by Bank and IDA 13455.15 18415.56
Total undisbursed (excluding ) 4508.5 3925.4
1/ IDA Credit amounts for SDR-denominated Credits are expressed in terms of their US dollarequivalents, as established at the time of Credit negotiations and as subsequentlypresented to the Board.
2/ Undisbursed amounts for SDR-denominated IDA Credits are derived as the undisbursed balanceexpressed in SDR equivalents (in turn derived as the difference between the original principalexpressed in SDRa (based on the exchange rate as established at the time of Credit negotiations)and the cumulative disbursements converted to SDR equivalents at the exchange rates prevailingat the respective dates of disbursements less cancellations expressed in SDR equivalents convertedto US dollar equivalents at the SDR/US dollar exchange rate in effect on Dec. 31, 1993.
e Not yet effective.
Source: Statement of Loans & Credits (LOALA) of December 31, 1993.
SCHEDULE D
PAGE 4 OF S
S. STATEMENT OF IFC INVESTMENTS
(As of December 31, 1993)
Amount (US$ million)
Fiscal Year Company Loan Equity Total
19S9 Repub.ic Forge Company Ltd. 1.50 _ 1.501959-92 Xirloskar Oil Engines Ltd. 0.85 _ 0.851960 Assam Sillimanite Ltd. 1.36 __ 1.361961 K.S.B. Pumps Ltd. 0.21 0.211963-66 Precision Bearings India Ltd. 0.65 0.38 1.031964 Fort Gloster Industries Ltd. 0.81 0.40 1.211964 Lakahmi Machine Works Ltd. 0.96 0.36 1.321964-75-79/90 Mahindra Ugine Steel Co. Ltd. 11.81 2.84 14.651967 Indian Explosives Ltd. 8.60 2.86 11.461967 Jayshree Chemicals Ltd. 1.0S 0.10 1.1S1969-70 Zuari Agro-Chemicals Ltd. 15.15 3.76 18.911977-87 Escorts Limited 15.55 _ 15.551978-87/91/93 Housing Development Finance Corp. 106.29 4.05 110.341980/82/87/89 Deepak Fertilizer and Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd. 7.50 4.23 11.731981-82 Nagarjuna Coated Tubes Ltd. 1.50 0.24 1.741981-82 Nagarjuna Steels Limited 2.88 0.24 3.121981-86-89 Tata Iron and Steel Company Ltd. 72.14 24.49 96.631981-90/93 Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. 29.71 9.30 39.011982 Ashok Leyland Limited 28.00 -- 28.001982 Coromandel Fertilizers Limited 15.88 _ 15.881982 The Bombay Dyeing and Manufacturing Co. Ltd. 18.80 _ 18.801982-87/91-93 ITh Signode 2.99 1.01 4.001982-87 The Indian Rayon Corp. Ltd. 14.57 __ 14.571983 Bharat Forge Company Ltd. 15.90 _ 15.901984-86 The Gwalior Rayon Silk Manufacturing (Weaving) Co. Ltd. 15.95 -_ 15.951985 Bajaj Auto Ltd. 23.93 -- 23.931985 Modi Cement 13.05 -- 13.051985-86/90-91 India Lease Development Ltd. 8.50 0.78 9.281985/91 Bihar Sponge 15.24 0.68 15.921986 Bajaj Tempo Limited 30.54 -- 30.541986/93 India Equipment Leasing Ltd. 5.50 0.30 5.801986 Larsen and Toubro Ltd. 21.78 -_ 21.781982-87-93/94 The Great Eastern Shipping Company Ltd. 68.00 13.89 81.891987 Export-Import Bank of India 15.45 IS 15.451987 Gujarat Fusion Glass Ltd. 7.52 1.70 9.221987 Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizer 38.07 __ 38.071987 Hero Honda Motors Ltd. 7.74 -- 7.741987 Hindustan Motors Ltd. 39.14 __ 39.141987 The Gujarat Rural Housing Finance Corp. -- 0.19 0.191987 Wimco Limited 4.70 -- 4.701987-89/90 Titan Watches Limited 22.02 1.15 23.171988 Invel Transmissions Ltd. -- 1.07 1.071989 Ahmedabad Electricity Company, Ltd. 20.83 -- 20.831989 WTI Advanced Technology -- 0.20 0.201989-90/92 Keltron Telephone Instruments, Ltd. -- 0.56 0.561989-92 Gujarat State Fertilizer 40.46 -- 40.461990 JSB India Securities Firms -- 0.37 0.371990 UCAL Fuel Systems Ltd. -- 0.63 0.631990-91 Tata Electric 111.88 -- 111.881991 ATIC Industries Export Pinance 0.28 -- 0.281991 Bombay Electric 68.00 -- 68.001991-93 CESC Ltd. 82.S1 -- 82.511991 Export Finance - AFDC 0.35 -- 0.351991 Herdilla Oxides and Electronics Ltd. -- 0.29 0.291991 Indust. Credit & Investment Corp. of India -- 26.60 26.601991/93 Infrastructure Leasing & Financial Services 15.00 4.92 19.921991 TDICI Development Finance Companies -- 2.05 2.051991/93 TRIVeNI -- 1.68 1.681991 Varun Transport, Storage & Communications 17.04 3.06 20.101992-93 Arvind Mills '22.13 19.16 41.29
5 - %-s FORESTRY RESEARCH EDUCATION AND EXTENSION PROJECT {-' HIMACHAL PRADESH GREAT HIMALAYAN NATIONAL PARK (9
_____ WIWLIPE SANCTUARIES SANCTUARYb *44on
Approximth \ HM_ PROJECT AREA BOUNDARY \ 5ofmrJp C J ju NATIONAL PARKS ~ RIVERS -31-30' 313N
N 2A IDIE ACURE SELECTED ELEVATIONS IMETERSI ¢^vPUNIAB > j3EECODEVELOLOMENT AREA 0 SELECTED CITiES AND TOWNS69
's K UTTAR t //lPOSSIBLE NATIONAL PARK EXTENSION STATE OR TERRITORY BOUNDARIES 7B3 OOI-IAPRDCSAV7777 POSSIBLE SANCTUARY EXTENSION - INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARIES 4so> RmpuJr JULY 1993;0
IBRD 24928
INDIA
FORESTRY RESEARCH EDUCATION AND EXTENSION PROJECTTOiR k snkosi A KALAKAD MUNDANTHURAI TIGER RESERVE