Which technology will be used to implement this interface? SI4 Project by Pierre Arnoux, Jérémy Benabu, Steve Colombié and Xavier Gentile Supervised by Mireille Blay-Fornarino and Sébastien Mosser Friday, 12 th June, 2009 1
Dec 24, 2015
Which technology will be used to implement this interface?
SI4 Project byPierre Arnoux, Jérémy Benabu, Steve Colombié and Xavier Gentile
Supervised by Mireille Blay-Fornarino and Sébastien Mosser
Friday, 12th June, 2009
1
StructureStructureProject contextPHP user interfaceJSF user interfaceComparisonConclusion
2Project context › PHP user interface › JSF user interface › Comparison › Conclusion
Project context Project context › Existent› Existent
Project context › PHP user interface › JSF user interface › Comparison › Conclusion 3
PhotosEvents
Menus
INTERFACE (to do)
Bad way!Data base
Good way!
Project context Project context › Objectives› ObjectivesWhich technology is the best?
Project context › PHP user interface › JSF user interface › Comparison › Conclusion 4
STRUTS ?.NET ?PHP ?JSP/JSF ?…
PHP ?JSF ?
Project context Project context › Objectives› ObjectivesCriteria to compare
Diffusion & reliabilityInstallation costUse costInteroperability
Project context › PHP user interface › JSF user interface › Comparison › Conclusion 5
Project context Project context › Planning› Planning
planning
Project context › PHP user interface › JSF user interface › Comparison › Conclusion 6
Use of existing Web ServicesUse of existing Web Services
Jérémy Benabu & Steve Colombié
Pierre Arnoux & Xavier Gentile
Jérémy Benabu & Steve Colombié
Pierre Arnoux & Xavier Gentile
PHP user interfacePHP user interfaceNUSOAP library
Easy installationWell documented Lot of examples
ApachePHP is executed by the serverEasy PHP
Project context › PHP user interface › JSF user interface › Comparison › Conclusion 7
Index.phpIndex.phpIndex.phpIndex.phpMenusMenusMenusMenus
DeleteDeleteDeleteDelete
ModifyModifyModifyModify
CreateCreateCreateCreate
ListingListingListingListing
CoursesCoursesCoursesCourses
CreateCreateCreateCreate DeleteDeleteDeleteDelete
ModifyModifyModifyModifyListingListingListingListing
ProxyProxy ProxyProxy
Courses_proxiesCourses_proxiesCourses_proxiesCourses_proxies Menus_proxiesMenus_proxiesMenus_proxiesMenus_proxies
ProxyProxyProxyProxy
NuSOAPNuSOAP NuSOAPNuSOAP
nusoapnusoapnusoapnusoap
ClassClass.ClassClass.
nusoapmimenusoapmimenusoapmimenusoapmime
PHP user interface PHP user interface › Architecture› Architecture
Project context › PHP user interface › JSF user interface › Comparison › Conclusion 8
PHP user interface PHP user interface › Development› DevelopmentClass Proxy (client):
Call web service with WSDLCall methods
Classes Courses / MenusUse their own proxy ObjectOne file for each functionnality
Easy to call a method (by generic function) Complex to receive parameters
Project context › PHP user interface › JSF user interface › Comparison › Conclusion 9
ProxyServerWSDL
Request
SOAPClient
Answer
PHP user interface PHP user interface › Demonstration› Demonstration
Project context › PHP user interface › JSF user interface › Comparison › Conclusion 10
JSF user interface JSF user interface › Architecture› Architecture
Project context › PHP user interface › JSF user interface › Comparison › Conclusion 11
JSF Pages
Managed Bean
WebServices
Java-based Web Application framework JSF uses a component-based approach
JSF user interface JSF user interface › Development› DevelopmentManaged Bean :
Getting WSDL’s Webservice Creating methods
Calling the WebService methods intuitively Called by JSF pages easily
Project context › PHP user interface › JSF user interface › Comparison › Conclusion 12
Managed Bean
Controller
Web Service
WSDL
JSF user interface JSF user interface › Demonstration› Demonstration
Project context › PHP user interface › JSF user interface › Comparison › Conclusion 13
ComparisonComparison
Project context › PHP user interface › JSF user interface › Comparison › Conclusion 14
JAVA API
VersusJSF PHP
ComparisonComparison
Project context › PHP user interface › JSF user interface › Comparison › Conclusion 15
ComparisonComparison
Project context › PHP user interface › JSF user interface › Comparison › Conclusion 16
ComparisonComparison
Project context › PHP user interface › JSF user interface › Comparison › Conclusion 17
ComparisonComparison
Project context › PHP user interface › JSF user interface › Comparison › Conclusion 18
Comparison Comparison › Results› ResultsJSF is reliable (it’s a standard made by Sun)
JSF is lighter than PHP to build interfaces.
JSF is easier and lighter to use than PHP for managing types (int, String…) .
JSF isn’t trivial to use, learning is needed.
We have chosen JSF
Project context › PHP user interface › JSF user interface › Comparison › Conclusion 19
ConclusionConclusionJSF will be used to implement the
user interfaces of the project jSeduite.
In our report we had made a tutorial about JSF and how to use it.
It was interesting to compare two great technologies.
Project context › PHP user interface › JSF user interface › Comparison › Conclusion 20