Top Banner
Welcome Service management. Unit 3 Mieke de Droog, M.A. 20 April 2011 1
37

Welcome

Feb 23, 2016

Download

Documents

decker

Welcome. Service management. Unit 3 Mieke de Droog, M.A. 20 April 2011. Why does the management of services deserve special attention?. The management of services deserves special attention because . They have characteristics that lead to special challenges for management. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Welcome

Welcome

Service management. Unit 3Mieke de Droog, M.A. 20 April 2011

1

Page 2: Welcome

2

Why does the management of services deserve special attention?

Page 3: Welcome

3

1. They have characteristics that lead to special challenges for management.

2. The importance of services in the economics has increased in the last decennia.

3. A lot of services developed into huge companies.

The management of services deserves special attention because

Van der AA & Elfring, 2003: 1

Page 4: Welcome

4

Why has the importance of strategic management increased in service companies?

Page 5: Welcome

5

The importance of strategic management increased in service companies because

1. service companies changed into huge companies due to big changes

2. international competition increased3. privatization of public services (e.g. WEB, SETAR)4. liberalization of markets5. innovations related to information technology (IT)

Van der AA & Elfring, 2003: 3

Page 6: Welcome

6

Why are management issues for service companies different from other companies?

The management issues for service companies are related with the characteristics of services.

Van der AA & Elfring, 2003: 3

Page 7: Welcome

7

What are specific dimensions for the quality of services?

Page 8: Welcome

8

Some specific dimensions for the quality of services are

1. Relatively difficult to determine what customers can expect from a service provider.

2. Relatively difficult to determine what the specifications and quality standards should be.

3. The client becomes more critical towards the quality of services

4. The options of service have increased5. The client has become more critical

Van der AA & Elfring, 2003: 4

Page 9: Welcome

9

There are different strategies to work towards an integrated policy to obtain a good quality of service

• Defensive: In response to management problems Management focus is on cost reduction

• Offensive: make use of the moment of interaction

Van der AA & Elfring, 2003: 5

Page 10: Welcome

10

Een dienst is een activiteit of een serie activiteiten die min of meer ontastbaar zijn, die meestal geproduceerd worden in interactie tussen klant en dienstverlenend bedrijf door middel van medewerkers, apparatuur en/of systemen (Grönroos, 2000 in Van der AA & Elfring, 2003:11).

Definition of service

Page 11: Welcome

11

Goods Services1.Tangible things 1. Intangible processes /

activities2. Customers do not contribute to the production

2. Customers are co- producers

3.Production and consumption separately

3. Bound by time and place, production and consumption at the same time

4. Homogeneity in products / processes

4. Heterogeneity in processes and results

5. Direct contacts between producer and customer are possible

Direct contacts are mostly necessary (person intensity)

Table 2.1 Goods and services differ from a management perspective

Sources: Norman (2000), and others, in Van de Aa & Elfring, 2003: 12

Page 12: Welcome

12

Analysis of basic characteristics of services are useful for strategic analysis

Two models explained by van der AA & Elfring:

1. Service process matrix, Schmenner, 1986

2. Positioning and nature of the service, Lovelock, 1992

Van der AA & Elfring, 2003: 25-29

Page 13: Welcome

13

Service process matrix, Schmenner, 1986

A little interaction A little customization

Much interactionMuch customization

Capital intensive.

Segment 1Service factory (transport/hotel)

Segment 2Service store (hospital)

Labor intensive. Segment 3Mass service (schools)

Segment 4Professional service (doctors)

Table 2.3 Services classified by labor intensity and possibilities for customer interaction and customization in from der Aa & Elfring, 2003: 25

Page 14: Welcome

14

Positioning and nature of the service. Lovelock, 1992Service oriented

on peopleService oriented on things

Tangible activities & Results

Transport of persons, Health careSports centreRestaurant

Transport of freightMaintenanceReparationCleaning

Intangible activities & Results

EducationMedia: television, radioTheaterInformation services

Bank servicesJudicial servicesAccountants servicesAssurance

Table 2.5 Positioning en nature of service in from der Aa & Elfring, 2003: 29

Page 15: Welcome

15

Basic characteristics of services

Issues for management

1.Intangibility; Controlling / reducing uncertainties of the client.. Copying of innovations by competitors.

2.Customer interaction Client is co-producer and affects quality and efficiency.Product and process are difficult to separate.

3.Bound to time and place Occupancy rate of capacityDistributed production, growth in multiple locations

4.Heterogeneity Reliability of serviceRealization of learning and scale benefits

5.Person intensity Great sensitivity for quality of role employees(Labor-) productivity

Table 2.6 Basic characteristics of service and related issues in from der Aa & Elfring, 2003: 30

Page 16: Welcome

16

What do you think are similarities/differences in service in the public and private sector ?

Page 17: Welcome

17

1. What are the 4 steps for successful service mentioned in the video?

2. Do you think they are also applicable in public service?

Fish; 10 minutes

Four steps1.Play2.Make their day3.Be there4.Choose your

attitude

Page 18: Welcome

18

What does the literature say?

Chapter 2. Clients in the public sector

Page 19: Welcome

“…. the ‘ customer service” movement has swept the Western world, but there simply has been little careful thought about who government’s customers are, how government activities can be restructured to advance customer service, how to balance the often conflicting expectations of government’s multiple customers, and what other goals might be sacrificed in the process.” Kettl, 1996

19

Who are government ‘s customers?

In Alford, 2009: 31

Page 20: Welcome

20

“‘ The archetypal transaction in the private sector is the market exchange between a customer and a private firm. In this exchange , which is both direct and voluntary, the customer provides money in return for goods or services. Each therefore gains private value, which they can appropriate and consume themselves, in a ‘value-creating process’ “ Kotler, 1980

In Alford, 2009: 32

Page 21: Welcome

21

Some of the transactions between government organizations and members of the public conform to this ideal –type. For example, public transport passengers or postal service users pay money and receive service in return. ……..But closer examination reveals that there is more to their transactions than the private sector model encompasses. …….‘Paying customer’ is not the only relationship which members of the public have with the transit authority. Alford, 2009: 32

Page 22: Welcome

22

Members of the public receive not only private value from governmental organizations, but also public value.(e.g. equity)

.”In this context, ‘the public’ is not an aggregation of individuals but a collectivity, in which they take part as citizens (Stewart and Ranson,1988 e.a.)

In Alford, 2009: 32-33

Page 23: Welcome

23

…. The public service consumer is also (nearly always) a citizen. It is a concept with a strong connotation of collective rather than individual action (‘Fellow citizens!’). Citizens owe duties and possess rights of the state. All this is alien to an individualist model where the market is the chief focus of transactions and values………… (Pollitt, 1990)

In Alford, 2009: 33

Page 24: Welcome

24

It is the citizen who ultimately determines, through the aforementioned political process, how much tax will be paid by whom, and what public value will be provided in return for it. These basic decisions are analogous to those made by customers in the private sector market exchanges. Accordingly, the citizenry is the key shaper and ‘consumer’ of public value.

Alford, 2009: 34

Page 25: Welcome

25

Table 2.1.

Alford, 2009: 36

Page 26: Welcome

26

Although economic exchange is of limited validity in dealings between public sector agencies and their public, social exchange offers a useful way of thinking about them (Ekeh, 1974, Turner ,1982)

In Alford, 2009: 37

Page 27: Welcome

27

Figure 2.1.

Alford, 2009: 41

Page 28: Welcome

28

Figure 2.2.

Alford, 2009: 44

Page 29: Welcome

29

To secure their compliance with the rules, schools can apply coercive powers, such as detentions, suspensions or ultimately expulsions. But it can also seek to understand the factors that make it difficult for some students to comply- such as attention deficit disorder or family dysfunction – and by addressing them, for example with medical advice or social work interventions, try to make it easier for students as expected. In other words, it also elicits compliance from its beneficiaries/obligates by treating them like customers.

Alford, 2009: 45

Page 30: Welcome

30

Is it possible to apply the private customer model to government organizations?

Page 31: Welcome

31

Is it possible to apply the private customer model to government organizations?

Strictly speaking no, because often there is no voluntary exchange of money for goods or services

“ But by broadening the range of values which might be exchanged, and the set of possible parties to that exchange, it is possible to make sense of relations between government agencies and the members of the public with whom they deal in terms of exchange, and thereby enable a more precise definition of client co-production. The range of values includes not only private values but also public ones, and not only economic but also normative and symbolic ones”. Alford, 2009: 48-49

Page 32: Welcome

32

When is encouraging client co-production appropriate?

1. When service production and delivery are absolutely inseparable (e.g. student, prisoner)

2. When clients can supplement, or substitute for, the labor and information provided by employees (e.g. tax office)

3. When clients have the abilities necessary to perform their roles (e.g. make use of internet)

Alford, 2009: 47

Page 33: Welcome

What motivates customers?1. When clients see that there is

something in for them- some kind of reward (extrinsic/intrinsic (the sheer enjoyment of the service experience)

2. By making it easier for clients to co-produce, both by reducing the complexity of the task and by enhancing the client’s capacities to perform it.

33In Alford, 2009: 48

Page 34: Welcome

Is it important to look at the role of public sector clients as co-producers?

34

Page 35: Welcome

“However, the focus on public sector clients so far had effectively ignored their role as co-producers. Consequently, it exhibits the same gap observed in the more general co-production experience: a neglect of clients as co-producers.

35

Alford, 2009: 32

Page 36: Welcome

Assignments:

36

Reminder: D2. Answer the reading questions of unit 4. Chapter 3. Gastelaars (2009) and send them via email to [email protected], [email protected] and [email protected]

Before 21 April 1.00 pm

www.ogm-clientbased-thinking.wikispaces.com

Page 37: Welcome

37

Questions?

Thank you for your attention and

www.ogm-clientbased-thinking.wikispaces.com