1 HTEC Mich_13jul10.pptx Wayne Hung 1 , Rufus Lamere 2 , and Gary SanMiguel 3 1 Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 2 Texas State Technical College, Waco, TX 3 Biomedical Manufacturing Center, Athens, TX Present at The Fourth Annual HTEC Conference Detroit, Michigan July 13-15, 2010 Contact: [email protected]BMC
38
Embed
Wayne Hung , Rufus Lamere , and Gary SanMiguel Gary.pdf1 HTEC Mich_13jul10.pptx Wayne Hung 1, Rufus Lamere 2, and Gary SanMiguel 3 1 Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 2 Texas
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1
HTEC Mich_13jul10.pptx
Wayne Hung1, Rufus Lamere2, and Gary SanMiguel31Texas A&M University, College Station, TX2Texas State Technical College, Waco, TX
Micromist2210EP oil, 0.022 cc/min25 mm @70° from z axis-120° in x-y plane
x
12
INVESTIGATION: machinesHaas SL20 CNC lathe:
Live tooling capability3,400 rpm spindle±3 µm repeatability
Micromist2210EP oil, 0.022 cc/min6 mm @150° from y axis-60° in x-y plane
zx
13
MICROMACHINING: tool setting
Microtool offset using laser sensor
(b)Set up for tool height z-offset
xzy
(a)Set up for edge detection on x-y plane
xy
z
14
MICROMACHINING: tool setting
Edge detection for tool offsets in x, y directions.
-3-2-10123
0 5 10 15 20 25Trial Number
Devia
tion
from
Mea
n (μ
m)
Laser on 5/16 inch drill Mechanical edge finder Laser on 1/8 inch plug gage
(mil)
0
-0.1
0.1X, Y settings depend on tool quality
A precision plug gage should be used
15
-15-10-5
0
51015
0 10 20 30Trial Number
Devia
tion
From
Mea
n (μ
m) paper & center drill
paper & 4-insert cutterlaser & drill on membrane
MICROMACHINING: tool setting
Tool height offset in z direction.
Z offset depends on tool geometry
Expect a larger z offset error than x, y offsets
0.2
0.4
-0.2
-0.4
0
(mil)
16
MACHINING: cutting fluid
1) Penetrate the boundary layer of a rapidly rotating tool,
2) Adhere to a tool surface despite centrifugal force, and
3) Wet the tool/chip interface to provide lubricating/cooling
For effective cooling/lubricating, cutting fluid must:
17
xpn = Vf t + Mα ( V0 cosθ0 - Vf ) [1 - e -(α /M) t ]
ypn = Mα V0 sinθ0 [1 - e -(α /M) t ]
Particle Trajectory
MACHINING: micromist
18
3/13
2/32
3/1 ]coscos32)cos1(.24[)(
θθθ
πθ
+−−
=K
VP
V: volume of dropletP: diameter of dropletK: 1 for θ<900; 0 for θ>900
θ : contact angle
MACHINING: coolant wetting
19
MACHINING: micromist
20
1
2
Apparatus for Surface tension measurement1. Needle for delivering liquid droplets2. Camera
MACHINING: micromist
21
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Water CL 1:30 2210 2210EP 2300 HD 2200
Con
tact
Ang
le (°
)
Coolant
1mm 1mm 1mm 1mm
316L Stainless Steel
MACHINING: micromist
220
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Water KM CL2200 CL2210EP CL2300HD CL2210 RL1:15
Cont
act A
ngle
(°)
Tungsten Carbide
MACHINING: micromist
23
22
6 2h rV h
hπ
⎡ ⎤= +⎢ ⎥
⎣ ⎦34
3V Rπ=
V: volume of dropleth: height of dropletR: radius of airborne dropletr: (D1+D2)/4
MACHINING: micromist
24
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Aver
age
Dia
met
er (µ
m)
Coolants
Coolant drop size comparison
2210 EP22102300 HD2200
MACHINING: micromist
25
(a) Micro-droplet on a rotating tool; (b) Free body diagram of forces acting on the micro-droplet
a) b)
m: mass of dropletv: surface speed of toolR: radius of toolD: diameter of dropletσ2: surface tension of liquid
2
22 sin DmvR
σ θ σ+ = Δ
MACHINING: micromist
26Balance of adhesion and centrifugal force on a 2210EP microdroplet
MACHINING: micromist
27
Parameters of tool wetting experiments:
•Tools are run from 0-500 m/min•Tool diameter: 3.175mm, 12.7mm•Air pressure: 3.197 to 3.39 bar•Stroke length: 2.7 mm•Stroke frequency: 12 strokes/min•Volume flow rate of coolant: 3.33 x 10-9 mm3/sec
MACHINING: micromist
Setup for validation of tool wetting
28(a)Mist spray setup (b) 3.175 mm 2 flute end-mill
12.7mm 2 flute end-mill (not shown)
APPROACH – OBJECTIVE # 2
RESULT: flow of micromist
Direction of flow@40 m/min
Separation of flow
Dia. 1.016mm cylinder@4000 RPM
RESULT: flow of micromist
31
MICROMACHINING: tool deflection
End deflection=17% tool diameter Bending stress= 50% tool strength
End deflection=34% tool diameter Bending stress= 100% tool strength
Spindle runout, built-up edge, uncontrolled chip, and/or cutting force deflect a microtool cyclically and cause premature tool failure.
Finite element analysis of bending stress on a micromilling tool.
33
MICROMACHINING: limit of parameters
Catastrophic failure threshold of micromilling tools.0.35mm (0.014 in) axial depth, dry , climb (down) side milling of 316L stainless steel.
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Radia
l dep
th / C
utter
Ф(%
)
Chipload / Cutter Ф (%)
Axial depth of cut (17% cutter dia)Axial depth of cut (34% cutter dia)Crash test
Tool fracture
Tool safe
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0 5 10 15 20
#4: dry#12: flood#20: mist
Time (min)
wear
(µm)
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0 5 10 15 20
#5: dry#13: flood#21: mist
Time (min)
wear
(µm)
TiN-WC, V3.6m/s, F6.4mm/s, D2mm
TiN-WC, V2.0m/s, F6.4mm/s, D1mm
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0 5 10 15 20
#2: dry#10: flood#18: mist
34
MICROMIST: macromilling
Time (min)
wear
(µm)
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0 5 10 15 20
#7: dry#15: flood#23: mist
Time (min)
wear
(µm)
TiN-WC, V2.0m/s, F12.7mm/s, D2mm
TiN-WC, V3.6m/s, F12.7mm/s, D1mm
35
MICROMIST: macrofacing
time(min)
0.00
0.04
0.08
0.12
0.16
0.20
0 20 40 60 80
#2: dry#6: flood#10: mist
WC on 4140, V0.9m/s max, F0.1mm/rev, D0.5mm
wear
(µm)
# passes
Dry, 75 passes
Flood, 75 passes
Mist, 75 passes
36
MICROMIST: micromilling
Micromilling of 316L stainless steel and effect of cutting fluids.10 µm/tooth (0.0004 in/tooth), 0.35mm (0.014 in) axial depth, 0.56 mm (0.022 in) radial depth, climb (down) side milling
37
1) NSF-RET programPromote collaboration among schools and industryEncourage college grads to continue for higher degrees
2) Effective micromist must:Penetrate and adhere to moving tool/workpiece.Wet both tool and workpiece.Avoid stagnant mist location.
4) Submicron mist particlesContaminate other equipment.Pose potential health issues.Should be used with air cleaner unit.
MICROMIST: summary
38
MICROMIST: future works
1) Complete DOE experiment and compare with theoretical data2) Compare economic advantages of dry, flood, and mist3) Apply to machines at TSTC Waco and BMC Athens4) Extend micromilling and include microdrilling studies using tool steel,