Outline
• Brief Introduction to Thermoelectric Technology.
• Thermoelectric Generator System Basics.
• Future Research and Development Needs.
This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the
United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any
agency thereof, nor any of their employees, make any warranty, express or
implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy,
completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process
disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.
Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by
trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily
constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United
States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors
expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States
Government or any agency thereof.
Disclaimer
SupportU.S. Department of Energy Grant # DE-FC26-04NT 42278 and DE-EEE0005432
John Fairbanks and Gurpreet Singh (DOE), Carl Maronde (NETL)
U.S. Department of Energy, Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Office of Vehicle
Technologies, as part of the Propulsion Materials Program, under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 with UT-Battelle, LLC
nm mm mm m
log(Length scale)
Engineering
Materials
Science
Chemistry
Physics
Competency
Electronic
Microstructural
0.001 0.0015 0.002 0.0025 0.003 0.0035 0.004 0.0045 0.0050
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
1406
1269
1131
994.1
856.8
719.5
582.2
444.9
307.6
170.3
Lp [m]
Wout
PbTe/TAGS85
Continuum
Atomistic
Waste Heat Recovery by Thermoelectrics• Thermoelectric materials make use of the Seebeck effect to generate a voltage from a
temperature difference.
• The voltage is then used to drive an external load.
• The electricity generated by the device can be used to supplement the alternator to
reduce its torque load on the engine, charge batteries, or be used for propulsion.
• High quality heat, like that found in the exhaust gas stream, is ideal for generating
large temperature difference for higher power densities.
𝑃𝑜𝑢𝑡 = 𝑉𝑜𝑐2
𝑅𝐿𝑜𝑎𝑑(𝑅𝑖𝑛𝑡 + 𝑅𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑)
2
𝑉𝑂𝐶 = 𝑆Δ𝑇
z𝑇 =𝑆2
𝜌∙𝜅𝑇
Materials Level Performance Metrics
System Level Metrics
TE Applications
Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators (RTG’s) for deep space probes. Radioisotope
provides thermal energy
RTG’s are used when solar flux is insufficient to supply onboard power requirements or when
sustained power.
Illustration of SNAP-19 RTG with n and p-type PbTe.
• TEGs go after waste exhaust heat, which is a sizeable portion of the energy flow through an ICE.
• TEGs can operate continuously EGHR systems often harvest heat only during warm up to improve engine and transmission performance.
• TEG’s go after an energy stream that is typically a total loss.
TEG System Basics (Your Power Source).
Operating Temperatures
Location is everything for TEG Performance
Effect of TEG Location on Power Output
Average Power:
Cat Out = 136 W
Flex = 94 W
Mid Muffler = 78.5 W
Full Size Truck 5.3 L V-8 Average Power:
Cat Out = 136 W
Flex = 94 W
Mid Muffler = 78.5 W
Effect of TEG Location on Power Output
Full Size Truck 5.3 L V-8
TEG Design (Integrated System Approach)
TEG Design (Integrated System Approach)
TEG Design and Packaging Location
TEG Design and Packaging Location
Power Management
The voltage of a TEG is a function of:
1) Seebeck Coefficient
2) The Junction Temperatures
3) The number of TE elements connected in series
Maximum power is extracted from the TEG at near half the open circuit voltage.
The voltage needs to be regulated to the voltage of the Vehicle.
This generally requires some type of DC-DC converter (Boost/Buck).
Battery Voltage
Expected On-cycle Fuel Economy Benefits• TEGs provide two FE improvement functions
1) Faster Powertrain warmup.
2) Supplemental electrical power to offset the alternator.
• Electrical power is generated after 2/3 of the energy of
combustion is lost and the alternator is not terribly efficient.
• Vehicle modeling and testing find that if all the electrical loads
can be met by the TEG the FE can be improved by about ½
MPG (250 to 350 W electrical load for FST).
• The relationship between the % power supplied by the TEG and
the expected FE benefit is linear.
• Further there is another 0.1-0.2 MPG from active warm up.
Off Cycle Credits
• EPA has 1.5 gCO2/mile credit for cars and 3.2 for light
trucks for active warm up of engines.
• There are additional 1.5 gCO2/mile credit for cars and 3.2
for light trucks for active transmission warm-up. This
requires an additional heat exchanger dedicated to the
Transmission
• There is a thermoelectric specific off-cycle credit equal to
0.7g CO2/mile for each 100 W of “rated electrical power”
• Rated electrical power is taken as the simple average of the
power output over the 5 cycles.
Challenging Characteristics of TEGs
• A TEG adds weight and cost
– OEM’s spend a bulk of their resources stripping these out of vehicles
and now we want to add it back in.
• A TEG is not customer facing
– If it works the way its supposed to the customer will never know that it’s
there.
• Does not benefit FE in all driving conditions.
– US DOT finds ~50% of all miles driven in the US are at higher speeds
on rural / urban interstates and highways.
• Packaging and Competing Space
– Smaller cars, where a TEG could arguable have a larger impact in FE,
are challenging to fit a TEG into and the radiator capacity are an issue.
R&D Needs
• There are still no materials commercially available that are well
suited to TEG applications.
• Cost effective DC-DC converter technology is still needed.
• TEGs at the current level of development are well suited to
larger vehicle.
• Reduction in TEG size and weight is still needed to make
these more broadly applicable to smaller cars.
Summary• TEGs have the same benefits of EGHR systems while providing recuperated
electrical energy under a variety of drive cycles.
• TEGs can provide a 0.5 MPG improvement on FTP cycle.
• There are three potential off-cycle credits available to TEGs.
• New approaches to TE generator designs are quickly reducing cost weight and
size of generator systems.
• Improvements in TE material performance is still needed to make TE’s more
competitive with more mature forms of waste heat recovery.
Acknowledgements
Collaborators/Subcontractors:
Marlow Industries: Jeff Sharp and Alan Thompson
Oak Ridge National Laboratory: Hsin Wang and Andy Wereszczak
University of Washington: Jihui Yang
Future Tech: Francis Stabler
Dana, Inc: Edward Gerges, John Burgers and Matthew Birkett
Eberspaecher: Lakshmikanth Meda and Martin Romzek
Molycorp: David Brown and David Miller
NASA JPL: Jean-Pierre Fleurial and Terry Hendricks
Brookhaven National Laboratory: Qiang Li
University of Michigan: Jeff Sakamoto
Delphi: Scott Brandenburg, Ray Fairchild and David Ihms
Purdue University: Xianfan Xu,