Top Banner
1 Jean-Louis Briaud – Texas A&M University Washington Monument Case History
21

Washington Monument Case History - JTC3jtc3.com/Washington Monument.pdf“The Washington Monument Case History”, International Journal of Geoengineering Case Histories, , Vol.1,

Apr 26, 2018

Download

Documents

ngonguyet
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Washington Monument Case History - JTC3jtc3.com/Washington Monument.pdf“The Washington Monument Case History”, International Journal of Geoengineering Case Histories, , Vol.1,

1

Jean-Louis Briaud – Texas A&M University

Washington

Monument

Case History

Page 2: Washington Monument Case History - JTC3jtc3.com/Washington Monument.pdf“The Washington Monument Case History”, International Journal of Geoengineering Case Histories, , Vol.1,

2

Jean-Louis Briaud – Texas A&M University

CREDITS

• Hugh Lacy, Mueser Rutledge, New York

• Briaud J.-L., Smith B., Rhee K.-Y., Lacy H., Nicks J.,

2009. “The Washington Monument Case History”,

International Journal of Geoengineering Case Histories,

http://casehistories.geoengineer.org, Vol.1, Issue 3,

p.170-188.

Efforts have been made to give credit for illustrations and text obtained from other sources. If you find credit missing on this document, please contact us so we can address the issue.

Page 3: Washington Monument Case History - JTC3jtc3.com/Washington Monument.pdf“The Washington Monument Case History”, International Journal of Geoengineering Case Histories, , Vol.1,

3

Jean-Louis Briaud – Texas A&M University

HISTORY

• George Washington, 1st President of USA

• Constructed in three phases:

• 1848: 1st phase = construction begins

• 1858: construction stops = no more money

• 1879: 2nd phase = underpinning

• 1880: 3rd phase = completion of the shaft

• 1884: construction completed

• Settlement measured since 2nd phase in 1879

Page 4: Washington Monument Case History - JTC3jtc3.com/Washington Monument.pdf“The Washington Monument Case History”, International Journal of Geoengineering Case Histories, , Vol.1,

4

Jean-Louis Briaud – Texas A&M University

CONSTRUCTION

• Began in 1848 with architect

Robert Mills

• Original foundation consisted of a

stair stepped pyramid made of

blue gneiss blocks

• Shaft made of marble blocks

• Construction was halted in 1858

with the shaft at a height of 55.5

m due to lack of funds

Page 5: Washington Monument Case History - JTC3jtc3.com/Washington Monument.pdf“The Washington Monument Case History”, International Journal of Geoengineering Case Histories, , Vol.1,

5

Jean-Louis Briaud – Texas A&M University

• Construction resumed in 1879, after

the Civil War with Lt. Col. Casey of the

US Army Corps of Engineers

• Casey considered the original

foundation inadequate and decided to

underpin it.

• Increased foundation area

• Founded on stiffer soil

• The Monument was completed in 1884

CONSTRUCTION

Page 6: Washington Monument Case History - JTC3jtc3.com/Washington Monument.pdf“The Washington Monument Case History”, International Journal of Geoengineering Case Histories, , Vol.1,

6

Jean-Louis Briaud – Texas A&M University

DIMENSIONS

Page 7: Washington Monument Case History - JTC3jtc3.com/Washington Monument.pdf“The Washington Monument Case History”, International Journal of Geoengineering Case Histories, , Vol.1,

7

Jean-Louis Briaud – Texas A&M University

LOAD vs TIME

First Phase of Construction

Underpinning

Final Phase of Construction

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

1845 1850 1855 1860 1865 1870 1875 1880 1885 1890

Time (years)

Lo

ad

(M

N)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

1997 2007

Page 8: Washington Monument Case History - JTC3jtc3.com/Washington Monument.pdf“The Washington Monument Case History”, International Journal of Geoengineering Case Histories, , Vol.1,

8

Jean-Louis Briaud – Texas A&M University

WEIGHT AND PRESSURE

• Weight of original foundation: 70 MN (Pressure =

118 kPa)

• Weight at end of Phase 1: 305 MN (Pressure =

513 kPa)

• Weight of new foundation: 153.8 MN

• Final weight of Washington Monument: 607.7 MN

(Pressure = 465 kPa)

• San Jacinto Monument: 313 MN

• Tower of Pisa: 142 MN

• Eiffel Tower: 94 MN

• Earth terrace: 86.4 kPa

Page 9: Washington Monument Case History - JTC3jtc3.com/Washington Monument.pdf“The Washington Monument Case History”, International Journal of Geoengineering Case Histories, , Vol.1,

9

Jean-Louis Briaud – Texas A&M University

PRESSURE vs. TIME

First Phase of Construction

Un

derp

inn

ing

Fin

al

Ph

ase o

f

Co

nstr

ucti

on

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

1845 1850 1855 1860 1865 1870 1875 1880 1885 1890

Time (years)

Pressu

re (

kP

a)

Completely Distributed Total Pressure

Underpinning-Only Total Pressure

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

1997 2007

Page 10: Washington Monument Case History - JTC3jtc3.com/Washington Monument.pdf“The Washington Monument Case History”, International Journal of Geoengineering Case Histories, , Vol.1,

10

Jean-Louis Briaud – Texas A&M University

51 SOIL BORINGS - DEEPEST 38 m

Page 11: Washington Monument Case History - JTC3jtc3.com/Washington Monument.pdf“The Washington Monument Case History”, International Journal of Geoengineering Case Histories, , Vol.1,

11

Jean-Louis Briaud – Texas A&M University

SOIL STRATIGRAPHY

Page 12: Washington Monument Case History - JTC3jtc3.com/Washington Monument.pdf“The Washington Monument Case History”, International Journal of Geoengineering Case Histories, , Vol.1,

12

Jean-Louis Briaud – Texas A&M University

SOIL PROPERTIES

Page 13: Washington Monument Case History - JTC3jtc3.com/Washington Monument.pdf“The Washington Monument Case History”, International Journal of Geoengineering Case Histories, , Vol.1,

13

Jean-Louis Briaud – Texas A&M University

SOIL PROPERTIES

Page 14: Washington Monument Case History - JTC3jtc3.com/Washington Monument.pdf“The Washington Monument Case History”, International Journal of Geoengineering Case Histories, , Vol.1,

14

Jean-Louis Briaud – Texas A&M University

SOIL PROPERTIES

Page 15: Washington Monument Case History - JTC3jtc3.com/Washington Monument.pdf“The Washington Monument Case History”, International Journal of Geoengineering Case Histories, , Vol.1,

15

Jean-Louis Briaud – Texas A&M University

SOIL PROPERTIES

Page 16: Washington Monument Case History - JTC3jtc3.com/Washington Monument.pdf“The Washington Monument Case History”, International Journal of Geoengineering Case Histories, , Vol.1,

16

Jean-Louis Briaud – Texas A&M University

BEARING CAPACITY

Page 17: Washington Monument Case History - JTC3jtc3.com/Washington Monument.pdf“The Washington Monument Case History”, International Journal of Geoengineering Case Histories, , Vol.1,

17

Jean-Louis Briaud – Texas A&M University

• Actual Pressure under old foundation = 513 kPa

• Ultimate pressure Pu under old foundation (Clay)

• Su = 72 kPa (from N=12 bpf, Kulhawy and Mayne, 1990), D = 2.34

m (at time of maximum loading), Nc = 6.2 (square foundation)

• Then Pu = 491 kPa

• Ultimate pressure Pu under old foundation (Sand) (Briaud and Gibbens, 1999):

• Blow count (N) = 12 bpf, Then Pu = 900 kPa

• FS = 0.96 – 1.75

P N S Du c u

75u

blowsP kPa N

ft

BEARING CAPACITY

Page 18: Washington Monument Case History - JTC3jtc3.com/Washington Monument.pdf“The Washington Monument Case History”, International Journal of Geoengineering Case Histories, , Vol.1,

18

Jean-Louis Briaud – Texas A&M University

STRESS INCREASE WITH

DEPTH BY 3D FEM (ABAQUS)Old foundation

(After Phase 1)

Underpinned foundation

(Before & after Phase 3)

Page 19: Washington Monument Case History - JTC3jtc3.com/Washington Monument.pdf“The Washington Monument Case History”, International Journal of Geoengineering Case Histories, , Vol.1,

19

Jean-Louis Briaud – Texas A&M University

CONSOLIDATION CURVE

Page 20: Washington Monument Case History - JTC3jtc3.com/Washington Monument.pdf“The Washington Monument Case History”, International Journal of Geoengineering Case Histories, , Vol.1,

20

Jean-Louis Briaud – Texas A&M University

RECONSTITUTED SETTLEMENT

Time in Years

Page 21: Washington Monument Case History - JTC3jtc3.com/Washington Monument.pdf“The Washington Monument Case History”, International Journal of Geoengineering Case Histories, , Vol.1,

21

Jean-Louis Briaud – Texas A&M University

The 50 tallest buildings in the world

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r45ls2q0OSc