Visit to University of Stirling Pam Hicks and Jennifer Anderson Research Funding Policy and Delivery Medical Research Council 29 September 2015
Jan 04, 2016
Visit to University of StirlingPam Hicks and Jennifer Anderson
Research Funding Policy and Delivery
Medical Research Council
29 September 2015
Contents
• MRC Mission
• Current MRC grants at Stirling
• MRC remit and funding opportunities
• Opportunities for early Career researchers
• The end to end process – submission to award
• Common errors in applications
Stirling Grants
Grant Ref Title PI Call StatusMR/N020030/1 Partnership
Grant: UK funding for the International Neuroinformatics Coordinating Facility and UK Node of the INCF
Prof Leslie Smith Research Boards Sep/Oct 15
In progress
MR/L017938/1 Identifying and measuring key cognitions in suicidal and non-suicidal self harm
Dr Andrew Siddaway
CRTF Pre-doc Active
MR/J000523/1 Alcohol policy interventions in Scotland and England
Dr Anne Marie MacKintosh
NPRI Active
Collaborations - Inbound
Research Organisation (Non-UK) Number of COI Grant Reference
Australia
University of Wollongong 1 MR/J000523/1
Inbound collaborationsResearch Organisation (UK) Number of COI Grant Reference
Buckinghamshire
Open University 1 MR/J000523/1
South Yorkshire
University of Sheffield 1 MR/J000523/1
Collaborations - Outbound
Outbound CollaborationsResearch Organisation (UK) Number of COI Grant Reference
Edinburgh
University of Edinburgh 1 MR/K023209/1
Gloucestershire
University of Bristol 1 MR/K025643/1
Lanarkshire
University of Glasgow 2MR/M009807/1, MR/L006367/1
Glasgow Caledonian University 1 MR/L003287/1
Nottinghamshire
University of Nottingham 1 MR/K023195/1
MRC mission
• Encourage and support high-quality research with the aim of improving human health.
• Produce skilled researchers.
• Advance and disseminate knowledge and technology to improve the quality of life and economic competitiveness in the UK and worldwide.
• Promote dialogue with the public about medical research.
MRC strategy
Research Changes Lives 2014-2019Strategic intent: to support excellent discovery science and partnerships
to promote translation to accelerate the pace of improvements in health and wealth.
• Strategic Aim One: Picking research that deliversSetting research priorities which are most likely to deliver improved health outcomes
• Strategic Aim Two: Research to peopleBringing the benefits of excellent research to all sections of society
• Strategic Aim Three: Going globalAccelerating progress in international health research
• Strategic Aim Four: Supporting scientistsSustaining a robust and flourishing environment for world-class research
MRC remit and partners
• MRC: basic research to early clinical trials
– Underpinning and aetiological– Prevention– Detection and diagnosis– Treatment development & evaluation– Phase 1 & 2 trials
• Other funders/partners– Government departments,
especially Health– Other Research Councils– Medical Charities– Industry– Innovate UK (was Technology
Strategy Board)
Basic research
Discovery Preclinical Early
Clinical Late
Clinical HTA
MRC
BBSRC
Medical Charities
Innovate UK (TSB)
NIHR
MRC’s Translational Research Funding
Continued commitment to basic research
BMC: Major Awards
Committee
Basic research Prototype discovery & design
Pre-clinical development
Early clinical trials
Late clinical trials
Biomedical Catalyst: DPFS
MRC/NIHR Methodology Research Programme
Biomedical Catalyst: RMRC
Translational Research Support
Health Technology Assessment
Efficacy and
Mechanism Evaluation Programme
MRC Lead NIHR Lead
Health Technology Assessment Programme
BMC: Confidence
in Concept
Innovate UK
Medical CharitiesBBSRC & EPSRC
Proximity to Discovery Industry Engagement Fund
Our emerging strategic interests
• Enable a more productive research base
• Lead the UK response to major world-wide health challenges
• Breakthroughs in complex diseases from human studies
• Informatics and computation at the heart of modern interdisciplinary medical research
• Promote innovative, discovery science and high-risk, high-gain basic research
• Encourage interdisciplinary science
• Accelerate translation and economic growth through creative working across academia and industry
Devolved funding
Expand opportunities to devolve a portfolio of funding to Universities for mutual benefits in agility, flexibility and creativity
Planned investment of at least £20m in 2015 towards:
• Translation – bridge funding gaps, support speculative early interactions, encourage collaborative R&D
• People – give flexibility to tailor training and develop specific skills, encourage people exchange
• Discovery – accelerate development of critical mass in important new areas of basic or interdisciplinary science
MRP Remit
The programme includes:
1.Methods development to underpin biomedical and health-related sciences.2.Methods evaluation, refinement and implementation: 3.'Methods in research’ for developing methods and their implementation in research standards with the aim of improving quality and consistency in practice, eg consensus statements.
MRP covers:– Research methods in disciplines including: biomedical, behavioural and social
science, experimental medicine, randomised trials, cohorts and other designs of health, health care, health services and health policy research;
1. Developing and evaluating theory and models relevant to health sciences;
1. Methods for effective regulation (including indices for decision making), approval, adaptation and reporting of new interventions (including behavioural);
1. Research methods for valid measures of health, e.g. health outcomes, exposure and risk (including behaviour, cognition and emotion), and wellbeing.
MRP Remit
Development of underpinning methodologies for areas such as:
•The design, conduct and analysis of clinical trials: methods for the assessment of risk, efficacy, safety and other issues related to regulatory approvals for new medicines, devices and diagnostics•Health economics•Biostatistics, mathematical and computational modelling•Bio- and Health-informatics•Epidemiology•Behavioural sciences and health psychology, qualitative analysis and mixed methods, medical sociology, organisational and management science and bioethics•Methods for effective regulation (including indices for decision making), approval, adaptation and reporting of new interventions•Research methods for valid measures of health, e.g. health outcomes, exposure and risk (including behaviour, cognition and emotion), and well being.
•Wet lab methodology development, or
•Technology development (although does cover statistical and computational analytic methods for data arising from these)
MRP does not cover:
MRP Highlight Notices
• Observational data in clinical decision making• Multiple testing/subgroup analyses• Missing data and propensity scores• Assessing quality of life in carers• Improved measurement methods for population
science research• Methodology for stratified medicine• Improving cross-sector comparisons; Beyond
QALY• Methodology for Eliciting Expert Opinion
A new funding scheme to support research organisations to use creative approaches to building relationships with industry partners. Support to allow RO to be proactive in developing new opportunities for collaboration.
Enhance academic understanding of industry or vice versa
Enabling universities to highlight opportunities for potential industry partners
People exchanges to enhance skills, knowledge and understanding
Exchanges are not expected to exceed 6 months
Providing awards up to £250,000
Proximity to Discovery: Industry Engagement Fund
Tackling the Research Challenges in AMR – a Cross Council Initiative
AMR Funders Forum - research councils, DH, government bodies and charities
•Antimicrobial resistance – a thematic approach
£30m available for research under four themes:
1. Understanding resistance – two research collaboratives and 11 innovation grants funded
2. Accelerating therapeutic and diagnostics development – calls closed
3. Understanding real world interactions – two calls launched, deadlines 6 October and 3 December
4. Behaviour within and beyond the healthcare setting – in development, call to be launched early 2016
For more info: [email protected]
Europe: Joint Programming Initiative – AMR•To develop integrated approaches to pursue unique world-class research
Funding Opportunities – Managed Mode Calls
• Call to lead MRC-NIHR workshop on Effect Size Methodology: Closes 1/11/2015
• Proximity to Discovery: Industrial Engagement fund: Closes 15/10/2015
• Public Health Intervention Development Scheme: Closes 19/11/2015
Funding Opportunities – Highlight notices
• These are areas with current MRC strategic interest. Response mode applications within these scientific remits should be submitted to the relevant board/panel
• Economic Impact• Environmental Exposure and chronic disease• Mechanistic research in nutrition• Novel tools and technologies for vaccinology
• Further information can be found at http://www.mrc.ac.uk/funding/how-we-fund-research/highlight-notices/
Funding Opportunities for Early Career Researchers
Capacity, Skills and Infrastructure update
Skills review Refresh priority areas Build skills to complement recent capital investments
Careers review Delivering clarity on career pathways – ‘map’ Review of impact and identify barriers: Student and Fellows next
destinations
Review mechanisms to ensure right support at right time Signposting non-clinical career options Supporting transitions Promoting flexible opportunities Aligning training investments to skills priorities
Consultation of ‘vulnerable’ skills, conducted in partnership with BBSRC: main cross-cutting themes emerging:
• Quantitative skills (developing digital excellence) as applied to variety of data sources (from ‘omics’ to health records)
• Interdisciplinary skills (at all interfaces including chemical/physical/engineering, social/economical and clinical, including for example imaging, health economics, antimicrobial resistance etc).
• Whole organ/ organism physiology (maintains profile and priority for high-cost in vivo training – mainly for studentships)
Refocus Skills fellowships – early career/change discipline Alignment of studentships to skill priorities
‘Networked Training Investments’
Revising skills priorities
MRC Fellowships - beforeNon Clinical, Clinical and Strategic Skills fellowships
MRC Career Framework – Going Forward
Interactive Framework (map)
MRC Early-Career Grant
New Investigator Research Grants – Researchers who are capable of becoming principal investigators and who
are now ready to take the next step towards that goal.
– Can provide early-career scientists with a route into a permanent lectureship position. For those with a post: funding and ‘protected time’ with which to establish an independent research career
– Currently between 3 and 10 years post doc research experience and should either be in first lecturer appointment, hold a junior fellowship, or be in a senior post-doctoral position
– Time attributed to the NIRG project is commensurate with career stage and academic responsibilities
– Usually 3 years funding – not renewable– Requires commitment from your host organisationNB Criteria currently under review
Fellowship or Research Grant?
Fellowship Research Grant (inc NIRG)
Only open to non-tenured staff and researchers from other
research organisations
Open to tenured, non-tenured and researchers from other research
organisations
Opportunities for predoc and postdoc researchers
Postdoc researchers only for NIRGs(predocs can apply for research
grants but would not be competitive)
Focused on the person, then the project
Focused on the project, then the person
Applicant invited to interview Proposals discussed at board/panel
3 to 7 year’s funding depending on fellowship
3 year’s funding
The end to end process – submission to award
Elements of Successful Proposals
• A clear rationale for the research
− Background− Hypothesis− Aims
• Preliminary data
• Methodology
• Have a plan B
− Risk & Mitigation!
• People, environment − Training for fellowships
• Resources well justified
• Summary of the entire proposal – write it last!
• Understandable by researchers outside the field – don’t underestimate the importance of the lay abstract either!
• Will be the first thing read by primary reviewers
Making a successful application: The Abstract
• May be the ONLY thing read by other committee members (but not at MRC of course)
• Will influence the way reviewers approach the rest of the proposal
What happens to your application once you hit the ‘submit’ button
Input Outputs/Outcomes Impacts (Academic/Economic/Social)
Improvements to health (living longer and with better quality of life)
Academic impact (effects on further research including other disciplines)
Improving the performance of existing businesses
Creating new businesses (that contribute to economic growth and further R&D)
Delivering highly skilled people to the labour market
Attracting R&D investment (from global business and non-UK funding sources)
Improving public policy and public services (including the NHS)
Engaging public support for medical research
Pathways to Impact
Funding for Research and Training
Generation of new Knowledge/publication
Trained people
Development of collaborative networks
Intellectual property/Licensing
Research materials/Technologies
Influences on policy & practice
Development of new products/processes
Dissemination of research
Common reasons why applications are returned
• CVs and publications listed on one document• Costs requested for open access/publishing• Letter of support is not signed and/or dated• Letter of support for human tissue not provided (when
applicable)• Equipment costs requested at 100%• For New Investigator Research Grants:
− Letter of support not signed by both Head of Dept and Vice-Chancellor (or equivalent)
− Research Organisation letter of support does not include salary details
− CV not on NIRG CV template
Expectations on Experimental Design in MRC Grant Applications
Aims•To increase reproducibility•Ensure appropriate use of animal numbers
All applications for research funding with animals must include:•Justification for use of animals•Calculations for determining sample size requested•Justification of size used•Plans for avoidance of experimental bias
If these are not included in the proposal form’s ‘Statistical Analysis’ section, the application will be returned for amendment. If the issues are not satisfactorily addressed, the application will be rejected.
Expectations on Experimental Design in MRC Grant Applications
For further information
•Guidance: (http://www.nc3rs.org.uk/arrive-guidelines )
•MRC Guidance for applicants, section 8.2 p39 (http://www.mrc.ac.uk/funding/guidance-for-applicants/)
Two-stage Review Process
Referee Assessment • Detailed evaluation of scientific quality, importance and
resource request• Inform short-listing decisions (triage) and final funding decision• Minimum of 3 reviewers per application, mix of UK/international
reviewers• Score 1-6• Role of Board / Panel is to consider the comments of the
referees more carefully than the score, which is only ever an indicator.
Board Assessment • Make funding decisions on behalf of MRC taking into account
broader strategic considerations (Council & Board) and portfolio balance
• Score 1-10
Starting the process
• Talk to the MRC• Consider all the options • Types of Grants
− Fellowships− New Investigator Research Grants− Research Grants
• Different Calls− Managed mode calls looking at specific science areas− Response Mode – Boards rounds take place 3 times a year,
standing panels in field of Translation, Methodology Research Panel etc also take place on a regular basis
− Studentships – Case Studentships• Take account of feedback provided to improve future applications• Ensure application fits the remit of the call applied for
Board and Panel recruitment
MRC are currently recruiting for board and panel members for the following: Closing Date 4pm on 2 October
• Boards: All 4 boards •Funding Panels:
• Developmental Pathway Funding Scheme • MRC-NIHR Methodology Research Programme
•Training and Career Development Panels: • Clinical Training and Career Development • Non-Clinical Training and Career Development • Skills Development
www.mrc.ac.uk/board-panel-vacancies