U.S. Baseline Briefing Book Projections for Agricultural and Biofuel Markets March 2015 FAPRI‐MU Report #01‐15 Prepared by the Integrated Policy Group, Division of Applied Social Sciences www.fapri.missouri.edu amap.missouri.edu Agricultural Markets and Policy
59
Embed
U.S. Baseline Briefing Book - FAPRI-MU · FAPRI-MU Report #01-15 - 2015 U.S. Baseline Briefing Book - Page 1 Summary Lower prices have resulted in a large decline in crop producer
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
U.S. Baseline Briefing Book Projections for Agricultural and Biofuel Markets
March 2015
FAPRI‐MU Report #01‐15
Prepared by the Integrated Policy Group, Division of Applied Social Sciences
www.fapri.missouri.edu
amap.missouri.edu
Agricultural Markets and Policy
Published by the Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) at the University of Missouri
(MU), 101 Park DeVille Drive, Suite E; Columbia, MO 65203. FAPRI–MU is part of the Division of
Applied Social Sciences (DASS) in the College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources (CAFNR).
www.fapri.missouri.edu
This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, under Agreement Nos.
58‐0111‐13‐002 and 58‐0111‐14‐001.
Any opinion, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the
authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture nor the University of
Missouri.
The crop, biofuel, government cost and farm income projections in this report were prepared by the
team at FAPRI‐MU, including Pat Westhoff ([email protected]), Scott Gerlt
Food prices and expenditures ................................................................................................... 45
Government costs ..................................................................................................................... 47
Payments and crop insurance .................................................................................................. 49
Farm receipts and expenses ..................................................................................................... 51
Farm income ............................................................................................................................. 53
Ranges from the 500 alternative futures ................................................................................... 55
FAPRI-MU Report #01-15 - 2015 U.S. Baseline Briefing Book - Page 1
SummaryLower prices have resulted in a large decline in crop producer income and could result in significant federal spending under new programs established by the 2014 farm bill. After reaching record levels in 2014, most livestock sector prices are also expected to decline in 2015. As a result, net farm income is projected to fall sharply.
These baseline projections for agricultural and biofuel markets were prepared using market information available in January 2015. Macroeconomic assumptions are based on forecasts by IHS Global Insight which suggest moderate growth in the U.S. and global economies. After declining sharply in late 2014, forecasted oil prices increase steadily.
The baseline incorporates the Agricultural Act of 2014 (the new farm bill). The analysis requires important assumptions about how people will respond to new program options. As more information becomes available, these assumptions and estimates will need to be revisited.
The figures reported here represent the average of 500 alternative outcomes based on different assumptions about the weather, oil prices and other factors. In some of the 500 outcomes, prices, quantities and values are much higher or much lower than the reported averages.
Some key results:
• Record production of corn and soybeans in 2014 has pushed down prices of all major grains and oilseeds.
• In response to lower expected prices, U.S. producers are projected to reduce corn, wheat and cotton acreage in 2015, while slightly increasing soybean area. The total area devoted to major crops declines in 2015, but remains above the average that prevailed over the 2008-13 life of the previous farm bill.
• Average projected corn prices recover to $3.89 per bushel for the 2015/16 marketing year in response to reduced U.S. production. Wheat and soybean prices both fall in 2015/16, to $5.17 per bushel and $9.29 per bushel, respectively, given continued large global supplies.
• Between 2016/17 and 2024/25, corn prices average $4.06 per bushel and soybeans $10.09 per bushel, similar to projections made last year. Wheat prices average $5.57 per bushel, and cotton prices average 63 cents per pound.
• Milk, hog and poultry prices are all projected to decline in 2015 as producers respond to lower feed costs and the record output prices of 2014 by significantly increasing production. Cattle and beef supplies remain tight in 2015, but prices begin to fall in 2016 as beef production starts to expand again.
• Lower prices translate into reduced farm income, as both crop and livestock cash receipts decline in 2015. Lower feed and fuel costs result in a modest reduction in total farm production expenses. Net farm income falls to $79 billion, a 27 percent decline from 2014.
• Payments under 2014 farm bill programs increase when crop prices fall. A projected $3.9 billion in Agriculture Risk Coverage (ARC) and Price Loss Coverage (PLC) payments for the 2014 crop will be made after fiscal year (FY) 2016 begins on October 1, 2015.
• Projected average ARC and PLC payments peak with the 2015 crop at about $6.5 billion, but decline to $3.4 billion for the 2018 crop. Actual ARC and PLC spending in any given year is likely to differ greatly from these projected averages, given price and yield volatility.
• Crop insurance net outlays are projected to average more than $8 billion per year over the next ten years.
• Projected food price inflation drops to 1.6 percent in 2015, and averages 2 percent per year from 2016-2024.
FAPRI-MU Report #01-15 - 2015 U.S. Baseline Briefing Book - Page 2
Key results
2008/09 2013/14 2016/17 2024/25Marketing year average 2014/15 2015/16 average
Crop pricesCorn farm price, dollars per bushel 5.06 3.63 3.89 4.06Soybean farm price, dollars per bushel 11.79 10.02 9.29 10.09Wheat farm price, dollars per bushel 6.54 6.13 5.17 5.57Upland cotton farm price, cents per pound 71.8 61.8 60.0 63.1
Crop area planted, million acresCorn 90.9 90.6 87.9 90.9Soybeans 76.6 83.7 84.2 83.4Wheat 56.8 56.8 55.1 54.8Upland cotton 11.0 10.8 9.5 9.512 major crops* 256.6 262.7 258.3 260.0
2008 2013 2016 2024Calendar year except as noted average 2014 2015 average
Livestock sector pricesFed steers, 5 area direct, dollars per cwt 105.81 154.56 156.07 129.23Barrows and gilts, 51 52% lean, dollars per cwt 55.86 76.03 62.11 56.07National wholesale broiler, cents per pound 84.32 104.87 94.53 95.55All milk, dollars per cwt 17.78 23.97 17.59 18.68
Note: The estimates are based on market information available in January 2015 and incorporate provisions of theAgricultural Act of 2014, the new farm bill. Projections are averages across 500 outcomes.
U.S. producers harvested record corn and soybean crops in 2014.
Both crops saw record yields, and soybean area was also at an all-time high.
World production of both crops also increased in 2014, breaking records set in 2013.
These large crops are the primary reason grain and oilseed prices have declined sharply from records set during the 2012/13 marketing year.
Corn prices declined from $6.89 per bushel in 2012/13 to about half that level at harvest time last fall.
If yields return to more normal levels in 2015, corn prices may recover, but average projected prices remain below $4.00 per bushel until 2017/18.
Soybean and wheat prices have also declined since 2012/13, and both could drop again in 2015/16 in the face of continued large global supplies.
Nominal net farm income reached record highs in 2013. Net farm income declined in 2014 because of lower crop prices.
In 2015, lower prices lead to a projected decline in both crop and livestock receipts.
Even though lower feed and fuel costs reduce production expenses, the sharp drop in receipts results in a 27 percent decline in net farm income in 2015.
Net farm income declines further from 2016-2018, to levels not seen since 2009.
Crop production, prices and farm income
FAPRI-MU Report #01-15 - 2015 U.S. Baseline Briefing Book - Page 3
2014 corn and soybean crops set records
4.0
2.8
0.2
8.5
18.1
10.9
0 5 10 15 20 25
U.S. corn yield
U.S. corn production
World corn production
U.S. soybean yield
U.S. soybean production
World soybean production
Percent increase from previous record
Large crops result in lower prices
02468
10121416
06/07 08/09 10/11 12/13 14/15 16/17 18/19
Marketing year
Dol
lars
per
bus
hel
Soybeans Wheat Corn
Net farm income declines from 2013 record
79
108
129
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
Calendar year
Bill
ion
dolla
rs
The baseline incorporates provisions of the Agricultural Act of 2014, the new farm bill.
For crop producers, this includes the elimination of direct and countercyclical (DCP) payments and the average crop revenue election (ACRE) program.
It also includes the creation of two new options, price loss coverage (PLC) and agriculture risk coverage (ARC), as well as new crop insurance policies and more.
The new PLC and ARC programs cost little when crop prices and revenues are high, but could make large payments when prices or revenues are low.
Given all of the assumptions of the baseline, average PLC and ARC payments for the 2014-2018 crops are just under $5 billion per year.
ARC spending is greatest in 2015/16 but declines in later years as the moving averages that determine benchmark revenues adjust.
Crop insurance net outlays peaked in FY 2013 because of 2012 drought losses. Projected crop insurance costs average $8 billion per year from FY 2015-FY 2020.
Net Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) outlays (covering commodity and disaster programs, the conservation reserve and more) reached $12 billion in FY 2014.
Projected net CCC outlays exceed $10 billion again in FY 2017, when ARC and PLC payments associated with the 2015 crop will be made.
New farm bill provisions and effects
FAPRI-MU Report #01-15 - 2015 U.S. Baseline Briefing Book - Page 4
Baseline incorporates 2014 farm bill provisions
0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.504.00
08/09 10/11 12/13 14/15 16/17 18/19
Marketing yearD
olla
rs p
er b
ushe
l
Corn target/reference Corn loan Corn direct payment
New crop payments replace DCP and ACRE
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
08/09 10/11 12/13 14/15 16/17 18/19
Marketing year
Bill
ion
dolla
rs
DCP and ACRE PLC ARC
Crop insurance costs can exceed other programs
02468
10121416
2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020
Fiscal year
Bill
ion
dolla
rs
CCC net outlays Crop insurance net outlays
The combination of tight supply and strong domestic meat demand resulted in record prices for many livestock products in 2014.
The record output prices coincided with sharply lower feed costs, allowing for record high profitability for many producers in 2014.
Recent profitability levels follow what was a very difficult set of years financially for many producers for all or most of 2008-2013.
Record levels of profitability will result in more meat production in coming years.
Pork and poultry production will increase in 2015 and 2016, as larger breeding herds and improved productivity combine for sharp increases in output.
It will take longer for beef production to increase due to the time required to raise a new animal to market weight once a decision has been made to expand output.
International dairy product prices decreased for most of 2014, as demand weakened and milk supplies recovered in many exporting nations.
U.S. product prices remained well above international levels for much of 2014, allowing for a record high all milk price near $24 per hundredweight.
U.S. prices have begun to decline in recent months, as markets catch up to the international supply and demand situation and domestic milk supplies increase.
Livestock and dairy outlook highlights
Weak international dairy markets affect milk price
68
101214161820222426
2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016
Dol
lars
per
hun
dred
wei
ght
U.S. all milk International dairy products (avg.)
FAPRI-MU Report #01-15 - 2015 U.S. Baseline Briefing Book - Page 5
Record high prices for cattle and hogs in 2014
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
280
2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016D
olla
rs p
er h
undr
edw
eigh
t
Fed steer Feeder steer Barrow and gilt
Meat production will grow, but at varying rates
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
2001-08 2009-13 2014 2015 2016 2017-24
Perc
ent c
hang
e vs
. prio
r yea
r
Beef Pork Chicken
Exports account for a much larger share of production for cotton, soybeans, wheat and rice than for corn, beef, pork or chicken.
Continued growth is expected in the share of beef, pork and chicken which is exported.
For corn and soybeans, the share exported would be larger if one considered exports of feeds, biofuels, vegetable oils, and other products derived from corn and soybeans.
Meat price inflation was much greater in 2014 than inflation for other food items.
CPIs for beef (up 12.1 percent), pork (9.1) and eggs (8.4) far outpaced price increases for fruits and vegetables (1.5), cereal and bakery items (0.2) and sugar and sweets (-0.8).
Although beef prices increase more than other food prices in 2015, the difference is much smaller than in 2014.
Other highlights: Biofuels, exports and food prices
FAPRI-MU Report #01-15 - 2015 U.S. Baseline Briefing Book - Page 6
Share of production exported varies
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%
Corn
Soybe
ans
Whe
atRice
Cotton
Beef
Pork
Chicke
n
Exp
orts
/pro
duct
ion
2003-2004 2013-2014 2023-2024
Ethanol production dips slightly in 2015 due to tighter margins but resumes a path of modest growth in the years that follow.
In the near term, lower oil prices result in an increase in motor fuel use, so more ethanol can be used in 10 percent blends.
U.S. exports (right axis) are projected to grow steadily as U.S. ethanol prices remain competitive globally.
Results are sensitive to assumptions about implementation of the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS).
Ethanol production and use grow slowly
02468
1012141618
2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024
Calendar yearB
illio
n ga
llons
0.00.30.60.91.21.51.82.12.42.7
Bill
ion
gallo
ns
Production Domestic use Exports (right axis)
Meat prices outpace other inflation one more year
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
2001-08 2009-13 2014 2015 2016 2017-24
Calendar year
Perc
ent c
hang
e vs
. prio
r yea
r
CPI for meat CPI for food General CPI
ARC is the other new option for grain and oilseed producers. Payments occur when county or farm-level revenues per acre fall below 86 percent of a benchmark.
The benchmark depends on moving five-year Olympic averages of national prices and county or farm yields.
To illustrate, consider a county where corn yields match the national average. At our average projected prices, the 2014-2016 crops would earn ARC payments, but the 2017 and 2018 crops would not.
The 2014 farm bill reauthorizes and consolidates conservation programs.
The Conservation Reserve Program is operated by the Farm Service Agency and funded by the CCC.
The Environmental Quality Incentives Program and the Conservation Stewardship Program are operated by the Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Total projected spending on these programs is around $5 billion per year.
Policy assumptions under the new farm billReference prices exceed old target prices
0123456789
08/09 10/11 12/13 14/15 16/17 18/19
Marketing yearD
olla
rs p
er b
ushe
l
Soybeans Wheat Corn
The 2014 farm bill eliminates the DCP and ACRE programs and creates several new programs.
PLC is one new option for grain and oilseed producers. Participating producers receive a payment when national season-average farm prices fall below fixed reference prices.
The new reference prices are higher than the target prices that were used in calculating countercyclical payments under the previous farm bill.
FAPRI-MU Report #01-15 - 2015 U.S. Baseline Briefing Book - Page 7
ARC benchmarks depend on moving averages
400
500
600
700
800
900
1,000
08/09 10/11 12/13 14/15 16/17 18/19
Marketing year
Dol
lars
per
acr
e
Corn revenue 86% of benchmark
Conservation programs total $5 billion per year
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
Fiscal year
Bill
ion
dolla
rs
NRCS programs Conservation reserve
FAPRI-MU Report #01-15 - 2015 U.S. Baseline Briefing Book - Page 8
Selected policy assumptions, 2014 2024
Policy Description
Direct, countercyclical and Not available for 2014 and subsequent crop yearsACRE payments
Price loss coverage Makes payments when marketing year average price falls below fixed reference prices:(PLC) Corn $3.70/bu.
Soybeans $8.40/bu.Wheat $5.50/bu.Rice $14.00/cwt ($16.10/cwt for Japonica)Sorghum $3.95/bu.Barley $4.95/bu.Oats $2.40/bu.Peanuts $535/tonSunflowers 20.15 cents/lb.Cotton not available
Paid on 85% of base acreage and program yields
Agriculture Risk Coverage Makes payments when county or farm per acre revenues fall below 86% of a benchmark(ARC) County option benchmark: 5 year Olympic average price multiplied by 5 year Olympic average yield
Farm option benchmark: 5 year Olympic average of weighted farm revenue per acreMaximum payment is 10% of benchmark valuePaid on 85% (county option) or 65% (farm option) of base acreageAlternative to price loss coverageAvailable for program crops (not upland cotton)
Sequestration Assumed to apply to PLC andARC payments and certain conservation paymentsRate: 7.0% for 2015 crop payments, declining to 5.8% for 2018 24 crop payments
Marketing loan program Continues 2008 farm bill provisions for crops other than upland cotton
Supplemental coverage option Available for program crops not enrolled in ARC beginning in 2015Area crop insurance available as a supplement to conventional insuranceCovers range between 86% and individual coverage level65% of premium subsidized
Upland cotton Stacked income protection program (STAX)Area crop insurance availabe in addition to conventional insurance80% of premium subsidized
Transition payment in 2014 (STAX not available until 2015)Loan rate varies in range dependng on recent world cotton pricesNo cotton PLC or ARC programsFormer cotton base (now generic base ) eligible for PLC or ARC if planted to other crops
Sugar Continues 2008 farm bill provisionsIncorporates stylized version of agreement with Mexico
Conservation reserve Caps conservation reserve acreage at 24 million acres by 2017
Dairy Margin insurance program establishedMILC no longer availableDairy product price support program not available for 2014 and subsequent years
For soybeans, expected average ARC payments exceed PLC payments for all five years of the 2014 farm bill.
Producers would also need to consider possible SCO benefits, which are only available to PLC participants.
Producers can enroll in the county-based ARC program, which pays on 85 percent of base area, or in the farm-based ARC, which considers all program crops on a farm and pays on 65 percent of base area.
Price expectations, yield histories and risk attitudes will affect producer enrollment choices.
Based in part on projected average payments, the baseline assumes most producers of wheat, sorghum, rice and peanuts will enroll in PLC.
Most soybean and corn producers are assumed to elect ARC. Of those enrolled in ARC, 90 percent are assumed to choose the county-based option.
Crop program participation under the new farm billPaths differ for projected average corn payments
05
1015202530354045
14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19
Marketing yearD
olla
rs p
er a
cre
ARC PLC
Under the new farm bill, producers must make a one-time choice to participate in ARC or PLC for the 2014-2018 crops.
Projected national average ARC payments for corn producers exceed PLC payments for the first three years, but the opposite is true for the last two.
Expected payments may be very different in different counties. For example, high 2014 yields may mean no 2014 crop ARC payments for corn in some counties.
Greater PLC enrollment assumed for most crops
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Soybeans Corn Wheat Sorghum Rice Peanuts
PLC County ARC Farm ARC
FAPRI-MU Report #01-15 - 2015 U.S. Baseline Briefing Book - Page 9
Expected ARC payments exceed PLC for soybeans
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19
Marketing year
Dol
lars
per
acr
e
ARC PLC
FAPRI-MU Report #01-15 - 2015 U.S. Baseline Briefing Book - Page 10
ARC
PLC County Farm
Corn 40.0% 54.0% 6.0%
Soybeans 30.0% 63.0% 7.0%
Wheat 60.0% 36.0% 4.0%
Upland cotton n.a. n.a. n.a.
Sorghum 80.0% 18.0% 2.0%
Barley 75.0% 22.5% 2.5%
Oats 50.0% 45.0% 5.0%
Rice 90.0% 9.0% 1.0%
Peanuts 95.0% 4.5% 0.5%
ARC and PLC participation(share of base acres)
ARC PLC
Corn $26.83 $19.92
Soybeans $16.91 $9.57
Wheat $11.16 $13.66
Upland cotton n.a. n.a.
Sorghum $11.00 $20.82
Barley $10.09 $21.70
Oats $1.96 $1.38
Rice $4.19 $66.02
Peanuts $44.91 $138.38
Payments per participatingacre, 2014 2018 average
Oil prices declined sharply in the final months of 2014.
IHS Global Insight forecasts that oil prices will recover, exceeding $140 per barrel by 2024.
Futures markets in early March 2015 suggested a much smaller increase.
Our stochastic simulations (see the end of this report) examine a range of energy prices around the IHS Global Insight figures.
Lower feed and fuel prices reduce farm production expenses in 2015.
Fertilizer prices are also expected to decline in 2015, offsetting cost increases for some other inputs.
Projected increases in fuel prices and general inflation in the economy contribute to an increase in overall farm input prices after 2017.
Macroeconomic assumptions and farm prices paidFaster U.S. growth and low inflation expected in 2015
*Marketing loan benefits and insurance net indemnities are averaged across all acres. PLC andARC payments are per participating acre.All projections are averages across 500 stochastic outcomes.
The 2014 soybean crop exceeded the previous record by over 18%. This was achieved by both a record yield and area.
Soybean area is expected to set a new record in 2015 and remain high given strong global demand.
Even with increased use in 2014/15, the consumption of soybeans cannot match the record production.
If yields decline to more normal levels in 2015, production and use of soybeans may be in closer balance.
Increasing demand from China is the primary cause of increases in U.S. soybean exports.
Domestic soybean crush also increases in response to rising demand for U.S. soybean meal and soybean oil.
Ending stocks jump sharply in 2014/15 after a very low carry-out in 2013/14.
Prices have fallen sharply in 2014/15, and a smaller decline is expected in 2015/16.
In 2014/15, the decrease in the soybean price is more than enough to offset the increased yield. This results in lower market returns.
Total and net returns decline again in 2015/16, as prices decline and yields are assumed to return to the long-term trend.
Program payments with the new farm bill could increase in 2015/16, but continue to be small relative to soybean market returns.
*Marketing loan benefits and insurance net indemnities are averaged across all acres. PLC andARC payments are per participating acre.All projections are averages across 500 stochastic outcomes.
Unlike corn and soybeans, U.S. wheat yields were down in 2014, resulting in a second straight year of declining production.
Even though projected planted wheat acreage is down in 2015, more typical weather might allow more of the crop to be harvested and yields to increase.
Imports, primarily from Canada, explain the continuing difference between production and total use.
The weakening of the corn price has led to less wheat being used for feed in 2013/14 and 2014/15.
Exports declined sharply in 2014/15 because of strong competition from other exporters and cheaper U.S. corn.
Exports slowly rebuild beginning in 2015/16, but competing exporters will continue to capture most of the world wheat market.
Food use of wheat increases with population.
Although U.S. wheat production was down in 2014/15, abundant domestic supplies of other crops and plentiful foreign production suppressed the price.
Lower prices and yields result in reduced receipts in 2014/15. Projected prices and returns fall further in 2015/16.
Net returns to U.S. wheat producers remain well above pre-2007 levels.
*Marketing loan benefits and insurance net indemnities are averaged across all acres. PLC andARC payments are per participating acre.All projections are averages across 500 stochastic outcomes.
Upland cotton acreage is likely to fall sharply in 2015, given low cotton returns in absolute terms and relative to competing crops.
Large international stocks limit export and price prospects. Domestic mill use is relatively flat and accounts for a small share of total use of U.S. cotton.
U.S. cotton competes well on quality terms, supporting export sales.
China continues to be the main source of uncertainty in world cotton markets.
China’s end-of-year cotton stocks are now almost twice as large as the amount of cotton China produces or uses each year.
Recent policy changes in China should end stock accumulation, but it is not clear when and how existing stocks will be reduced.
Cotton revenues per acre harvested fall in 2014/15, as both prices and yields decline.
Cotton returns stay below 2013/14 levels through the baseline.
Cotton prices sometimes drop enough to trigger marketing loan benefits.
Transition payments provide support in 2014, and a new crop insurance program, STAX, is available in 2015.
Upland cottonCotton acreage, production fall in 2015
*Marketing loan benefits, transition payments and insurance net indemnities are averaged across all acres.All projections are averages across 500 stochastic outcomes.
U.S. sorghum production rebounded in 2013 and 2014. Stronger export demand helps sustain the higher production levels.
China accounts for the big increase in sorghum exports. This has allowed sorghum to sell at a premium to corn in 2014/15.
The baseline assumes China’s demand for sorghum imports will abate enough that sorghum prices will return to a more typical relationship to corn prices. There are no guarantees this will occur.
As with several other crops, sorghum returns have been declining since 2012/13.
Projected average sorghum prices are near or below the levels that trigger PLC payments.
Higher PLC participation rates for sorghum allow more acres to be eligible for SCO, thereby increasing crop insurance net indemnities.
Unlike other crops, barley returns have remained strong, dipping only slightly in 2014/15.
Like sorghum, average barley projected prices are near or below levels that trigger PLC payments.
High expected PLC payments discourage ARC participation and encourage SCO enrollment.
Sorghum and barley
FAPRI-MU Report #01-15 - 2015 U.S. Baseline Briefing Book - Page 21
Sorghum production and exports increase in 2013/14
*Marketing loan benefits and insurance net indemnities are averaged across all acres. PLC and ARC payments are per participating acre.All projections are averages across 500 stochastic outcomes.
Barley supply and use
June May year 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 24/25
Area (Million acres)Planted area 2.98 3.33 3.43 3.39 3.33 3.29 3.27 3.21 3.17 3.06 2.99Harvested area 2.44 2.87 2.95 2.91 2.85 2.82 2.80 2.76 2.72 2.62 2.56
*Marketing loan benefits and insurance net indemnities are averaged across all acres. PLC and ARC payments are per participating acre.All projections are averages across 500 stochastic outcomes.
Reduced total supplies have helped keep oat prices from falling as much as prices for corn and sorghum since 2012/13.
Prices of all the major coarse grains move together in the baseline.
Projected prices for oats remain around $3.00 per bushel, and projected program payments are smaller than for other program crops.
Hay yields and production increased in 2013 and 2014 after the drought-reduced hay crop of 2012.
Hay production is expected to increase as lower returns for other crops allow land to revert to hay and cattle numbers increase.
Increased production in 2013 and 2014 allowed stocks to rebuild.
National average hay prices have declined in recent months to the lowest levels in four years.
If production and stocks rebuild as projected, national average hay prices could continue to drop to about $150 per ton.
Hay markets are particularly fragmented. National average prices might not reflect local conditions.
Oats and hay
FAPRI-MU Report #01-15 - 2015 U.S. Baseline Briefing Book - Page 23
*Marketing loan benefits and insurance net indemnities are averaged across all acres. PLC and ARC payments are per participating acre.All projections are averages across 500 stochastic outcomes.
Hay supply and use
May April year 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 24/25
*Marketing loan benefits and insurance net indemnities are averaged across all acres. PLC and ARC payments are per participating acre.All projections are averages across 500 stochastic outcomes.
Sugar supply and use
October September year 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 24/25
*Marketing loan benefits and insurance net indemnities are averaged across all acres. PLC and ARC payments are per participating acre.All projections are averages across 500 stochastic outcomes.
Sunflower seed supply and use
September August year 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 24/25
Area (Million acres)Planted area 1.56 1.70 1.74 1.74 1.74 1.71 1.70 1.69 1.67 1.65 1.64Harvested area 1.51 1.57 1.61 1.61 1.61 1.59 1.57 1.56 1.54 1.53 1.52
*Marketing loan benefits and insurance net indemnities are averaged across all acres. PLC and ARC payments are per participating acre.All projections are averages across 500 stochastic outcomes.
Land useCorn area falls in 2015, soybean area increases
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024
Year crops harvested M
illio
n ac
res
Corn Soybeans Wheat
Cotton acreage planted decreases in 2015
02468
10121416
2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024
Year crops harvested
Mill
ion
acre
s
Upland cotton Sorghum Rice
Lower corn prices lead to a reduction in corn area planted in 2015.
Soybean area increased sharply in 2014, and is projected to set another record high in 2015.
Wheat area is likely to decrease in 2015, as USDA reports that winter wheat seedings were down by 2 million acres.
Low prices and returns will likely reduce the total amount of land devoted to corn and soybeans in 2015.
Cotton acreage increased slightly in 2014, but declines in 2015 because of weak returns.
Sorghum acreage is projected to increase slightly in 2015 in response to strong prices relative to other crops.
Continued drought in California coupled with lower prices elsewhere push rice acreage down in the short-tem.
Land planted to 12 major crops increased in 2014 as soybean area increased by about 7 million acres.
Lower expected returns in 2015 put downward pressure on area.
The CRP cap is lower under the new farm bill, allowing more potential acres for crop production.
12 crop planted area likely to fall
220
240
260
280
300
320
340
360
2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024
Year crops harvested
Mill
ion
acre
s
12 crops 12 crops + hay + CRP - double-crop
FAPRI-MU Report #01-15 - 2015 U.S. Baseline Briefing Book - Page 29
FAPRI-MU Report #01-15 - 2015 U.S. Baseline Briefing Book - Page 30
Land use for major crops and the conservation reserve
Future biodiesel use of soybean oil is constrained by competition from corn oil and other biodiesel feedstocks.
Per-capita domestic use of soybean oil for purposes other than biofuel production remains around 43 pounds per year between 2014/15 and 2024/25.
Soybean oil exports increase after 2020. Foreign use of vegetable oil in fuel increases because of rising petroleum prices.
Stagnant livestock and poultry production and competition from distillers grains have limited domestic use of soybean meal in recent years.
Projected increases in soybean meal use result from resumed growth in poultry and pork production and slower expansion of distillers grains use.
Soybean meal exports remain stable as growing world demand is met by Argentina and other competitors.
Soybean meal and oil prices have declined in 2014/15 because of large global oilseed supplies, and a further decline in 2015/16 is projected.
After 2020, vegetable oil prices are supported by rising petroleum prices.
Projected crushing margins (the difference between the value of soybean meal and oil and the cost of soybeans) average $1.75 per bushel from 2015-2024. This is slightly less than the 2011-2014 average.
Soybean productsExpansion in biodiesel use of soybean oil ends
Price (Dollars per ton)Decatur, 48% protein 355.76 337.65 335.61 346.32 360.88 366.46 362.48 359.34 347.67 343.58 334.37
Corn products
Along with conventional ethanol production, there is modest growth in distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS) production.
Domestic use is sustained by rising livestock feed demand overall, but limited by competition from other feeds.
Net exports remain flat throughout the projection period. Disputes regarding approved corn varieties make DDGS exports to China a key source of uncertainty.
Prices for DDGS generally move with corn prices and slightly exceed them in the projection period.
Export demand lends support to DDGS prices. China is a major source of uncertainty for U.S. exports and prices.
Wet mills produce ethanol, HFCS and other products including food-grade corn oil. Dry mills can extract nonfood-grade corn oil from distillers grains.
The baseline projects a further increase in the share of dry mill ethanol plants that extract corn oil.
The oil removed in dry mill plants is used in feed rations and biodiesel production.
A growing share of corn oil goes to these nonfood uses.
The outlook assumes the RFS percent requirements for biomass-based diesel remain at 1.13 percent going forward. This implies a volume requirement slightly above 1.28 billion gallons.
Biomass-based diesel production falls further in 2015 without the blenders tax credit in place but recovers in later years to meet RFS requirements.
Corn oil based biodiesel and renewable diesel production increase from their current levels.
Domestic biomass-based diesel use falls just below the RFS requirement in 2015. RIN stocks are used to make up the difference.
In later years, biomass-based diesel is used beyond its own requirement to help meet the advanced or overall mandates.
The U.S. remains a small net importer of biomass-based diesel in the near term, but is projected to be a small net exporter in later years.
Average dry mill ethanol net returns over operating costs fall sharply in 2015 before recovering in 2016.
Biomass-based diesel net returns continue their descent in 2015 without the blenders tax credit in place. They recover in 2016 and remain near the level of dry mill net returns.
RFS implementation and the costs of selling larger volumes of fuels with more than 10 percent ethanol remain important sources of uncertainty.
Biomass-based diesel production recovers
0.00.20.40.60.81.01.21.41.61.82.0
2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024
Calendar yearB
illio
n ga
llons
Soy oil Corn oil Other fats/oils Renewable diesel Cellulosic diesel
Biomass-based diesel use exceeds RFS mandate
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024
Calendar year
Bill
ion
gallo
ns
RFS requirement Domestic use
Biofuel net returns hold steady beyond 2016
-0.20
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024
Calendar year
Dol
lars
per
gal
lon
Dry mill ethanol Soy oil biodiesel
FAPRI-MU Report #01-15 - 2015 U.S. Baseline Briefing Book - Page 37
FAPRI-MU Report #01-15 - 2015 U.S. Baseline Briefing Book - Page 38
The annual cattle inventory report released by USDA in early 2015 showed a 2.1 percent increase in beef cows, only the third annual increase since 1996 and the largest increase since 1994.
Further increases are expected due to strong profitability levels and improved pasture conditions.
Despite the expected growth, the beef cow herd will still remain smaller than the levels seen prior to 2010.
The December 2014 quarterly hog inventory report noted a sharp increase in the U.S. sow herd.
The 3.7 percent year-over-year increase is the largest in more than 16 years.
Farrow-finish profitability was strongly positive throughout 2014, and as returns are projected to be positive in 2015, further growth in the herd is expected.
The porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDv) greatly impacted the number of pigs saved per litter in the first half of 2014.
Disease impacts have waned recently, and in the absence of a further significant outbreak, the amount of pork produced per sow is expected to stabilize in 2015 and return to normal growth in 2016.
The combination of a larger sow herd and more pork production per sow will result in a sharply higher pork supply.
Cattle and hogsThe beef cow herd increased during 2014
28
29
30
31
32
33
2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024M
illio
n he
ad (J
an. 1
)
Beef cow inventory
FAPRI-MU Report #01-15 - 2015 U.S. Baseline Briefing Book - Page 39
Pork productivity begins to recover in 2015
3,600
3,800
4,000
4,200
4,400
4,600
4,800
5,000
2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024
Poun
ds
Pork production per sow
Sow inventory grows by largest amount since 1998
5.6
5.7
5.8
5.9
6.0
6.1
6.2
6.3
2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024
Mill
ion
head
(Dec
. 1 p
rior y
ear)
Sow inventory
FAPRI-MU Report #01-15 - 2015 U.S. Baseline Briefing Book - Page 40
The total of U.S. beef, pork, chicken and turkey production should increase at the fastest rate since 2002 in 2015.
All of the growth will come from the pork and poultry sectors.
Beef production will decline for the fifth consecutive year as producers hold back more animals from market to rebuild the beef cow herd.
This will lead to an even wider spread between beef and other meat prices.
U.S. meat export volumes remained stable in recent years despite sharply higher prices and a strengthening U.S. dollar against most currencies.
Some signs of weakening export levels began to appear in the final months of 2014, and meat imports (particularly beef) were higher than in recent years.
With strong growth in domestic meat production projected for the next few years, the U.S. meat sector will need to expand international shipments to keep prices from declining sharply
The amount of meat per person available in the domestic market fell by nearly 20 pounds (8.8 percent) from 2007-2012.
Domestic meat availability is now projected to grow at rates not seen since the early 2000s.
Future meat demand strength will play a large part in determining how far prices fall in light of additional supplies.
Meat
FAPRI-MU Report #01-15 - 2015 U.S. Baseline Briefing Book - Page 41
A decline in input costs coupled with a record high all milk price led to profitability at or near record levels in 2014.
Input costs are projected to decline further in 2015, but an even larger drop in projected milk prices will cause 2015 profitability levels to be more in line with the historical average.
The milk price outlook depends upon the strength of international demand for dairy products. China has sharply increased its purchases of milk powders this decade, but its slowdown in purchases in 2014 led to price declines.
The U.S. dairy herd added 100 thousand cows (1.1 percent) during 2014.
Further increases are expected during the first portion of 2015, though the rate at which prices decline will have an effect.
Milk production per cow increased by 2.0 percent in 2014, the second highest growth in yields since 2005.
The Margin Protection Program-Dairy (MPP-Dairy) became operational late last year.
Enrollment information recently released by USDA shows that about half of U.S. licensed dairy operations signed up for 2015 coverage.
If dairy margins fall at least as much as projected in 2015, participation could increase in 2016. Producers must enroll by September 30, 2015 to be eligible for 2016.
Dairy
FAPRI-MU Report #01-15 - 2015 U.S. Baseline Briefing Book - Page 43
Producers have responded by building the dairy herd
9.05
9.10
9.15
9.20
9.25
9.30
9.35
9.40
9.45
2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024
Mill
ion
head
Dairy cow inventory
2014 was a profitable year for the dairy industry
0
4
8
12
16
20
24
28
2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024D
olla
rs p
er h
undr
edw
eigh
t
Feed costs Other operating costs All milk price
Margins retreat in 2015 and 2016
4
6
8
10
12
14
2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024
Dol
lars
per
hun
dred
wei
ght
Calculated MPP-Dairy margin
FAPRI-MU Report #01-15 - 2015 U.S. Baseline Briefing Book - Page 44
The CPI for food increased by 2.4 percent in 2014, despite growth of 7.2 percent in the CPI for meat.
As additional meat supplies lead to reduced prices for most meat products in 2015, the CPI for food is projected to grow by only 1.6 percent.
Food price growth should fall further in 2016 as lower commodity prices this year are not immediately passed through to the retail level.
Raw commodity values only account for 15-20 percent of U.S. consumer food spending.
The cost of transforming raw farm commodities to finished food products is highly dependent on a number of macroeconomic factors.
Sharply lower energy prices and modest wage rate growth help to keep the costs of finished food products from growing much through 2016.
Food prices and expenditures
Continued improvement in the U.S. economy has contributed to higher food price inflation for food away from home in recent months.
Economic growth is one factor behind the long term trend of an increasing share of U.S. consumer food spending directed to food consumed away from home.
Food away from home expenditures only accounted for 40-42 percent of total food spending from 1986-1992, but will soon account for more than half of the total.
Food inflation slows in 2015
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024Pe
rcen
t cha
nge
CPI for food
FAPRI-MU Report #01-15 - 2015 U.S. Baseline Briefing Book - Page 45
Slow growth in food marketing costs through 2016
-1012345678
2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024
Perc
ent c
hang
e
CPI for food Macro index for marketing costs
Spending on food away from home increases
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024
Perc
ent
Share of food expenditures away from home
FAPRI-MU Report #01-15 - 2015 U.S. Baseline Briefing Book - Page 46
(Dollars per person)Total food per capita 4,358 4,381 4,420 4,535 4,660 4,786 4,917 5,048 5,168 5,281 5,396
Food at home 2,236 2,217 2,224 2,270 2,325 2,382 2,441 2,499 2,552 2,601 2,651Food away from home 2,121 2,164 2,196 2,265 2,334 2,404 2,476 2,549 2,616 2,680 2,745
Multiply by population for: (Billion dollars)Total U.S. food expenditures 1,389 1,408 1,432 1,481 1,534 1,588 1,645 1,702 1,755 1,807 1,861
Government costs
Net CCC outlays were $12 billion in FY 2014, with direct payments and livestock disaster assistance accounting for most of the spending.
Under the 2014 farm bill, direct payments end and ARC and PLC payments begin in FY 2016.
Average projected ARC and PLC spending peaks with the 2015 crop, and those payments are made in FY 2017.
Net CCC outlays between FY 2015 and FY 2024 total $79 billion.
Mandatory government outlays under the crop insurance program and certain conservation and disaster programs are not included in the CCC account.
Like ARC and PLC outlays, crop insurance spending can vary a lot from year to year.
Crop insurance net outlays total almost $85 billion between FY 2015 and FY 2024.
Livestock forage assistance totals an estimated $5.7 billion in FY 2014 and FY 2015.
USDA projects that livestock aid and the non-insured assistance program (NAP) will have annual outlays of over $700 million between FY 2016 and FY 2024.
Other disaster aid from FY 2008-FY 2013 was provided from non-CCC accounts.
CCC outlays total $79 billion over FY 2015-24
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024
Fiscal yearB
illio
n do
llars
Grains, oilseeds & cotton Conservation All other
10-year crop insurance outlays total $85 billion
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024
Fiscal year
Bill
ion
dolla
rs
Net CCC Crop insurance Non-CCC conservation Other non-CCC
Livestock aid totals almost $6 billion over FY 2014-15
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024
Fiscal year
Bill
ion
dolla
rs
CCC disaster and NAP Other disaster and emergency
FAPRI-MU Report #01-15 - 2015 U.S. Baseline Briefing Book - Page 47
FAPRI-MU Report #01-15 - 2015 U.S. Baseline Briefing Book - Page 48
Note: NRCS Conservation denotes mandatory spending on conservation programs authorized by the 2002, 2008 and 2014 farm bills that is notincluded in reported CCC outlays. Fiscal years begin on Oct.1 of the previous calendar year (FY 2015: Oct. 1, 2014 Sep. 30, 2015).All projections are averages across 500 outcomes.
Payments and crop insurance
With the new farm bill in place, PLC and ARC replace DCP and ACRE for grain and oilseed producers.
Projected ARC and PLC payments peak in 2015/16. After 2015/16, program rules force ARC revenue benchmarks to adjust downward for many crops and counties.
Payments generally move inversely with prices, explaining both the decline from 2015-2020 and the increase from 2020-2024.
Cotton and peanuts receive most of the projected marketing loan benefits.
Crop insurance indemnities spiked because of the 2012 drought.
The projections include the new STAX policy for cotton and SCO for program crops.
Projected average indemnity payments for losses top $10 billion per year.
The average annual loss ratio (total indemnities divided by total premiums) over the next 10 years is 0.93.
The crop insurance program has grown in importance relative to other farm programs.
Projected net indemnities (indemnities minus producer-paid premiums) exceed the projected value of crop payments under Title I (PLC, ARC and marketing loans) of the new farm bill after 2016/17.
Actual crop insurance indemnities will vary greatly from year to year, as will Title I benefits.
Lower prices reduce cash receipts from sales of current and former program crops (grains, oilseeds, cotton and sugar) for the third straight year in 2015 and drop again in 2016.
Increasing production and slightly higher prices result in a small increase in program crop receipts from 2016 to 2021.
Receipts for other crops (including vegetables, fruits, nursery crops, hay and biomass crops) dipped slightly in 2014, but rise steadily in the future.
Livestock, dairy and poultry sector receipts peaked at $209 billion in 2014, a $90 billion increase from 2009.
Lower prices for poultry products, hogs and milk result in lower receipts in 2015.
Cattle prices decline in 2016, and total livestock sector receipts reach their lowest point in 2018.
Fuel, feed and fertilizer expenses are all projected to decline in 2015, resulting in the first year-over-year decline in total farm production expenses since 2009.
Fuel prices and expenses increase steadily from 2016-2024.
Feed costs increase between 2016 and 2020 in response to increased livestock production and higher prices for corn, soybean meal and other feeds.
Program crop receipts return to recession lows
020406080
100120140160180
2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024
Calendar year B
illio
n do
llars
Program crops Other crops
Livestock receipts decline from 2014 record high
0
50
100
150
200
250
2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024
Calendar year
Bill
ion
dolla
rs
Cattle Poultry & eggs Dairy Hogs & other
FAPRI-MU Report #01-15 - 2015 U.S. Baseline Briefing Book - Page 51
Fuel, feed and fertilizer expenses decline in 2015
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024
Calendar year
Bill
ion
dolla
rs
Feed Fertilizer & chemicals Fuel & electricity
FAPRI-MU Report #01-15 - 2015 U.S. Baseline Briefing Book - Page 52
Corn prices depend on weather, energy prices, income growth and much more.
To examine alternative futures for agricultural markets, we considered 500 different combinations of assumptions about factors driving commodity prices.
Although corn prices average about $4 per bushel across the stochastic outcomes, there are some combinations of assumptions for any given year that lead to prices over $5 per bushel and some where prices drop below $3 per bushel.
PLC program costs are uncertain. If season-average market prices are above reference prices, no payments occur, but payments can be large if prices drop far below reference prices.
Given all the assumptions of this analysis, average PLC costs average less than $1 billion for the 2014/15 crop but increase to almost $3 billon in 2016/17.
In some of the stochastic outcomes program spending is near zero. In others, it is more than twice the average level.
Given assumed participation rates and the projected paths of average market prices and yields, average ARC payments increase from $3 billion for the 2014/15 crop to almost $4 billion in 2015/16, but then decline in subsequent years.
As with PLC, spending can be far above or below the average for any given year.
The provision that limits ARC payments to 10 percent of the benchmark revenue per acre puts an upper cap on program payments.
Ranges from the 500 alternative futures
PLC program costs are uncertain
012345678
14/15 16/17 18/19 20/21 22/23 24/25
Marketing year
Bill
ion
dolla
rs
90th percentile Average of 500 outcomes 10th percentile
FAPRI-MU Report #01-15 - 2015 U.S. Baseline Briefing Book - Page 55
90th percentile Average of 500 outcomes 10th percentile
ARC payments can also vary greatly
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
14/15 16/17 18/19 20/21 22/23 24/25
Marketing year
Bill
ion
dolla
rs
90th percentile Average of 500 outcomes 10th percentile
Given the uncertainty over spending on the new PLC and ARC programs, net CCC outlays can be far greater or less than the projected average.
If prices are above reference prices and revenues are above average recent averages, the conservation reserve program and livestock disaster aid may be the only major CCC outlays.
In contrast, low prices or per-acre revenues could trigger payments that exceed the levels of recent years.
Volatility in commodity yields and prices creates uncertain outlays for the crop insurance program.
Higher crop prices, production and coverage levels increase crop insurance premiums and premium subsidies.
In any given year, outlays will depend on yields, prices and resulting indemnities.
In extreme weather years, indemnities and outlays can far exceed the average, as in FY 2013.
Net farm income depends on production levels and the prices of agricultural outputs and inputs, all of which are uncertain.
As a result, future levels of net farm income are also quite uncertain.
The sources of uncertainty considered in this analysis lead to a wide range of possible farm income levels for any given year.
There are certain to be risks not captured in these 500 alternative futures.
Ranges from the 500 alternative futures
Crop insurance net outlays are also uncertain
02468
10121416
2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024
Fiscal year
Bill
ion
dolla
rs
90th percentile Average of 500 outcomes 10th percentile
FAPRI-MU Report #01-15 - 2015 U.S. Baseline Briefing Book - Page 56
CCC net outlays could vary greatly from averages
02468
1012141618
2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024
Fiscal yearB
illio
n do
llars
90th percentile Average of 500 outcomes 10th percentile
Net farm income likely to stay below 2011-14 levels
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024
Calendar year
Bill
ion
dolla
rs
90th percentile Average of 500 outcomes 10th percentile