Two birds with one stone. An economically viable solution for linked open data platforms

Two birds with one stone. An economically viable solution for linked open data platforms

Riccardo Bonazzi, Zhan Liu

University of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland

HES-SO Valais-Wallis

Our idea in a nutshell

Problem:

Cost (data integration & platform management) VS

Profit (freely available data)

Gap in the literature:

existing classifications do not take into account economic sustainability.

Our solution:

a simple typology and revenue model for a linked open data platform [under test]

1

2

3

How to define a revenue model to increase the adoption of linked open data?

How to define a revenue model to increase the adoption of linked open data?

How to define a revenue model to increase the adoption of linked open data?

First order constructs

First order constructs

First order constructs

Idealtypes

First order constructs

Idealtypes

First order constructs

Idealtypes

Price : LowCost: LowThird-party support: LowProfit: Low

Price : LowCost: LowThird-party support: HighProfit: Medium

Price : LowCost: HighThird-party support: LowProfit: None

Price : LowCost: HighThird-party support: HighProfit: Medium

Price : HighCost: LowThird-party support: LowProfit: High

FREEMIUM (Pay for changes)

Price : HighCost: LowThird-party support: HighProfit: High

2B1S

Price : HighCost: HighThird-party support: LowProfit: Medium

Price : HighCost: HighThird-party support: HighProfit: High

RAZOR AND BLADE

Our idea in a nutshell

Cost VS Revenues

existing classifications

VS economic sustainability

a revenue model for LOD platform

[under test]

1

2

3

Two birds with one stone. An economically viable solution for LOD platforms

[email protected]

[email protected]