Top Banner
Trent University 2017 Solid NonHazardous Waste Audit Prepared for: Trent University 1600 West Bank Drive Peterborough, Ontario, K9L 0G2 Prepared by: Waste Reduction Group Inc 801 King Street West, Unit PH#20 Toronto, Ontario, M5V 3C9 Phone (416) 8234554 Waste Reduction Group Project P0703 March 2017
86

Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

Jun 06, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

    

 Trent University 

2017 Solid Non‐Hazardous Waste Audit  

 

 

 

     

 

Prepared for:  

Trent University 1600 West Bank Drive 

Peterborough, Ontario, K9L 0G2     

Prepared by:  

Waste Reduction Group Inc 801 King Street West, Unit PH#20 

Toronto, Ontario, M5V 3C9 Phone (416) 823‐4554 

   

Waste Reduction Group Project P0703 March 2017 

Page 2: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

2016 Solid Non‐Hazardous Waste Audit     Trent University Waste Reduction Group Project P0703    March 2017 

i

Executive Summary Trent University retained the services of Waste Reduction Group  Inc to conduct a solid non‐hazardous waste audit at its two campuses located in Peterborough and Oshawa, Ontario. Samples of waste were collected over four (4) days in January 2017, totalling 367.2 kg of garbage. Waste materials collected for the  audit were  labelled  to  indicate  building  and  functional  area,  including  office  areas,  public  areas, classrooms,  washrooms,  food  service  areas,  dining  areas  and  complex  labs.  The  following  list summarizes the overall trash composition determined from the audit:  

Organic Waste                 26.1% 

Non‐recyclable                20.6% 

Paper Towels:                18.0% 

Mixed Papers:                 9.6% 

Mixed Containers:              9.2% 

LDPE (#4 Plastic) films:              6.2% 

Coffee Cups:                 5.3% 

Lab Glass & Plastics:              3.3% 

Electronic wastes:              0.5% 

Cardboard, scrap wood, scrap metal, toners, batteries, Styrofoam:  Each < 0.5%      

Through  discussions with  Trent University  personnel,  estimates  of  the  annual  amounts  of  solid  non‐hazardous waste materials disposed, reduced, reused, recycled and composted were determined. Waste diversion  programs  implemented  on  campus  include  cardboard,  mixed  containers,  mixed  papers, confidential papers, organics, scrap metals, scrap woods, electronics, bulbs, batteries, printer toners, oil and grease, yard wastes, wood pallet reuse, donations/Swap Shop, LCBO/Beer Store returns and waste reduction initiatives including water bottle filling stations, double sided printing policies, refillable coffee mug  program  and  take‐out  boat  reductions.  The  following  table  summarizes  the  overall  annual quantities of waste materials generated, reduced, reused, recycled, composted and disposed in 2016. 

Overall Annual Quantities of Materials Diverted & Disposed 

Material  Total Annual Amount  

  Metric Tonnes  Percent 

Disposed to Landfill  293.92  18.8% 

Materials Reduced  0.12  0.01% 

Materials Reused  10.82  0.7% 

Materials Recycled  1210.79  77.3% 

Materials Composted  50.38  3.2% 

Total Waste Generated  1566.02  100% 

 Based  on  the  total  annual  amount  of waste  generated  and materials  reduced,  reused,  recycled  and composted,  the  2016  waste  diversion  rate  through  existing  programs  at  Trent  University  was 

determined to be approximately 81.2%. The provincial objective for waste diversion rate is 60%. Waste diversion  rates  for  the  Peterborough  and Durham  campuses were  determined  to  be  81.5%  and 58.2% respectively. Trent University’s management team are committed to maintaining and improving their waste diversion rate in order to minimize the amount of materials disposed to landfill. 

Page 3: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

2016 Solid Non‐Hazardous Waste Audit     Trent University Waste Reduction Group Project P0703    March 2017 

ii

Table of Contents 

Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. i 1  Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1  Purpose ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2  Scope of Work ........................................................................................................................... 1 2  Methodology ............................................................................................................................. 2 3  Waste Audit Results ................................................................................................................... 3 3.1  Garbage Quantities & Distribution ............................................................................................ 3 3.2  Garbage Composition ................................................................................................................ 4 3.2.1  Overall Garbage Composition .................................................................................................... 4 3.2.2  Peterborough Campus Garbage Composition ........................................................................... 5 3.2.3  Durham Campus Garbage Composition .................................................................................... 6 3.2.4  Garbage Composition per Functional Area ............................................................................... 7 3.2.5  Overall Garbage Composition per Functional Area ................................................................... 7 3.2.6  Peterborough Campus Garbage Composition per Functional Area .......................................... 8 3.2.7  Durham Campus Garbage Composition per Functional Area ................................................... 8 3.3  Percentage of Recyclables in Garbage ...................................................................................... 9 4  Diversion Programs & Waste Systems .................................................................................... 12 4.1  Waste Diversion Programs ...................................................................................................... 12 4.2  Waste Disposal Systems .......................................................................................................... 14 4.3  Waste Diversion Rate .............................................................................................................. 14 4.4  Capture Rate ............................................................................................................................ 15 4.5  Year over Year Change in Waste Generation .......................................................................... 16 4.5.1  Year‐over‐Year Change in Diverted Quantities ....................................................................... 16 4.5.2  Year‐over‐Year Change in Garbage Disposed .......................................................................... 16 5  Waste Audit Summary & Waste Reduction Work Plan ........................................................... 17 6  Conclusions & Recommendations ........................................................................................... 17  

Appendices Appendix A ................................................................................................... Supporting Documentation  Appendix B .................................................................................................................. Waste Audit Data  Appendix C ................................................................... Peterborough Campus ‐ Waste Audit Summary  Appendix D .......................................... Peterborough Campus ‐ Waste Reduction Work Plan Summary  Appendix E ............................................................................ Durham Campus ‐ Waste Audit Summary  Appendix F ................................................... Durham Campus ‐ Waste Reduction Work Plan Summary     

Page 4: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

2016 Solid Non‐Hazardous Waste Audit     Trent University Waste Reduction Group Project P0703    March 2017 

1

1 Introduction 

Trent University  (TrentU)  retained  the  services of Waste Reduction Group  Inc  to  conduct a  solid non‐hazardous waste audit for the educational institution. Trent U operates two campuses, located in  Peterborough  and Oshawa.  The waste  audit  examined  representative  samples  of waste  from eight (8) different areas on the campuses over a four (4) day period in January 2017. The goal of the waste audit was to gain an understanding of the quantities and composition of solid non‐hazardous wastes generated at the educational institution. 

TrentU  is a multi‐building  community  that has a population of approximately 8500  students and staff that generate waste and divertible materials. TrentU took the initiative to conduct a solid non‐hazardous waste audit with the  intent of complying with O.Reg. 102/94, confirm compliance with O.Reg.103/94  and  to  further  improve  upon  their  present waste  reduction,  reuse  and  recycling initiatives.  

1.1 Purpose The purpose of the solid non‐hazardous waste audit was to:  

Comply with Part X of O.Reg. 102/94  ‘Waste Audits and Waste Reduction Work Plans’, which requires  the operator of an educational  institution with more  than 350 students enrolled per year,  to  conduct an annual waste audit and prepare and  implement a waste  reduction work plan (Refer to Appendix A for a partial excerpt of O.Reg.102/94);   

Confirm compliance with Section 14 of O.Reg.103/94  ‘Industrial, Commercial and  Institutional Source Separation Programs’ and Part X  ‘Educational  Institutions’ of the Schedule attached to the Regulation (Refer to Appendix A for a partial excerpt of O.Reg.103/94). 

 

Determine the annual waste diversion rate for TrentU resulting from existing waste reduction, reuse, and recycling programs; 

 

Identify point of generation and quantify composition of wastes at TrentU;  

Identify any additional opportunities for waste reduction and diversion that may exist at TrentU;   

Address any specific concerns or opportunities identified during the study.  

1.2 Scope of Work 

To satisfy the purpose of the waste audit, the following scope of work was completed:  

Collected data pertaining to waste composition at the campuses as follows:  

o Peterborough Campus: January 18, 19 and 20, 2017; and o Durham Campus: January 27, 2017. 

 

Page 5: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

2016 Solid Non‐Hazardous Waste Audit     Trent University Waste Reduction Group Project P0703    March 2017 

2

Determined  the  total  quantity  of  waste materials  diverted  from  landfill  by  TrentU  through current reduction, reuse, and recycling initiatives;  

 

Completed a Waste Audit Report  (per MOE protocol)  that addressed  the amount, nature and composition  of  the  waste,  the  manner  by  which  the  waste  was  generated,  including management decisions and policies that relate to the production of waste, and the way in which the waste is managed on campus; and 

 

Completed a Waste Reduction Work Plan (per MOE protocol) regarding plans to reduce, reuse and  recycle waste on  campus. The  report  set out who will  implement each part of  the plan, when each part will be implemented and what the expected results shall be. 

 

2 Methodology Discussions were held with TrentU personnel to review existing waste management and recycling programs  implemented  on  campus.  Based  on  previous waste  audit  experience  and  information gathered by TrentU, a waste audit schedule was developed. The waste audit was performed over four (4) days in January 2017, as summarized in Table 1:  Table 1: 2017 Waste Audit Sample Schedule 

Date  Campus  Building/Location 

January 18, 2017  Peterborough  Champlain,  

January 19, 2017  Peterborough  Gzowski, Environmental Science, Blackburn, DNA 

January 20, 2017  Peterborough  Champlain, Otonabee College, Lady Eaton College 

January 27, 2017  Durham  Durham Campus 

 In coordination with the TrentU staff, twenty‐four hour samples of waste were collected from each of  the  identified  buildings  and/or  locations  on  the  waste  audit  schedule,  except  for  Durham Campus. At  this  location, a 72‐hour sample was collected. Sample weights  from Durham Campus were thus adjusted to representative 24‐hr weights throughout the report.   Bags of garbage were collected and labelled describing the functional area within the building that generated  the waste material,  including office  areas, public  areas,  classrooms, washrooms,  food service kitchens, dining areas and complex labs.  The collected bags of labelled wastes were brought to a designated collection and waste audit area by  TrentU  staff.  The  weights  of  waste materials  from  each  building  and  functional  area  were recorded. Refer to Appendix A for a copy of the Scale Calibration Certificate.   Waste materials were then unloaded, sorted into individual waste categories, weighted, re‐bagged and  disposed  of  in  the  appropriate  garbage  or  recycling  bins. Waste  samples were  sorted  by  a qualified  team  from Waste Reduction Group. Materials  source  separated by TrentU  for  recycling were not  collected and  categorized during  the audit however  the annual quantity of all diverted materials was reviewed and included in the audit results.   

Page 6: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

2016 Solid Non‐Hazardous Waste Audit     Trent University Waste Reduction Group Project P0703    March 2017 

3

Waste material categories were established prior to the audit based on O.Reg.103/94 requirements for source separation at educational institutions, including:  

Aluminum food or beverage cans (including cans made primarily of aluminum); 

Cardboard (corrugated); 

Fine paper; 

Glass bottles and jars for food or beverages; 

Newsprint; and  

Steel food or beverage cans (including cans made primarily of steel).  In  addition  to  these  standard  categories  other  important  waste  streams  such  as  other  mixed containers  (PET,  HDPE,  polypropylene,  aseptic),  organic  wastes,  paper  towels,  mixed  plastics, Styrofoam, yard waste, electronic waste, scrap wood, scrap metal and special wastes (i.e. batteries, bulbs and ballasts) were included depending on what auditors found in the samples.  

3 Waste Audit Results  3.1 Garbage Quantities & Distribution A key aspect of O. Reg. 102/94 is for waste generators to gain a good understanding of the areas of their  operation  that  generate  the  most  waste,  how  it  is  generated,  as  well  as  the  waste composition. One  can  use  this  information  to  focus  their  recycling  and waste  reduction  efforts efficiently and effectively.  Table 2 summarizes the quantity and distribution of waste materials collected for the waste audit.   Table 2: Quantity & Distribution of Waste Audit Sample 

Campus  Building Name Waste Audit Sample 

Sample Weight (kg)  Distribution (%) 

Peterborough 

Otonabee College  70.88  19.3% 

Environmental Science  57.93  15.8% 

Champlain  57.00  15.5% 

Gzowski  49.06  13.4% 

DNA  48.92  13.3% 

Lady Eaton College  34.90  9.5% 

Blackburn  11.88  3.2% 

Durham    36.61  10.0% 

Total    367.18  100.0% 

 Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the  total waste  audit  sample weight  respectively. Otonabee College,  Environmental  Science  and Champlain buildings generated the most garbage at the Peterborough Campus.  In addition, a review of TrentU’s activities  identified the  following  functional areas within campus buildings: 

Page 7: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

2016 Solid Non‐Hazardous Waste Audit     Trent University Waste Reduction Group Project P0703    March 2017 

4

Office/Administrative Areas  Dining Areas 

Public Areas  Complex Laboratories 

Classrooms  Food Services 

Washrooms  Table  3  ranks  the  quantity  of  garbage  generated  per  functional  area  based  on  the waste  audit results.   Table 3: Waste Generated per Functional Area 

Building Name Peterborough Campus Durham Campus Overall Sample

Sample Weight (kg) 

Distribution (%) 

Sample Weight (kg) 

Distribution (%) 

Sample Weight (kg) 

Distribution (%) 

Public Areas  80.00  24.2% 6.95 19.0% 86.95  23.7%

Classrooms  65.37  19.8% 13.01 35.5% 78.38  21.3%

Washrooms  61.96  18.7% 3.65 10.0% 65.61  17.9%

Dining Areas  37.38  11.3% 6.82 18.6% 44.20  12.0%

Office Areas  38.78  11.7% 2.96 8.1% 41.74  11.4%

Complex Labs  42.70  12.9% 0.00 0.0% 42.70  11.6%

Food Services  4.38  1.3% 3.22 8.8% 7.60  2.1%

Total  330.57  100.0% 36.61 100.0% 367.18  100.0%

 At  the  Peterborough  campus,  public  areas,  classrooms  and  washrooms  generated  the  most garbage. At  the Durham Campus,  classrooms, public  areas  and dining  areas  generated  the most garbage.  When  considering  the  entire  university,  public  areas,  classrooms  and  washrooms generated the most garbage.  

3.2 Garbage Composition  

3.2.1 Overall Garbage Composition The total weight of waste collected and sorted for the audit was approximately 367.18 kg. Table 4 summarizes  the  composition  from  Peterborough  Campus,  Durham  Campus  and  the  overall university.   Table 4: Garbage Stream Composition Material  Peterborough Campus Durham Campus Overall University

Mixed Containers  9.2% 9.5% 9.2%

Mixed Papers  8.9% 15.4% 9.6%

Cardboard  0.3% 0.5% 0.3%

Paper Towels  18.2% 15.8% 18.0%

Coffee Cups  4.9% 8.7% 5.3%

Organics  25.0% 36.5% 26.1%

LDPE Plastic Films  6.1% 6.3% 6.2%

Non‐recyclable  22.1% 6.5% 20.6%

Lab Glass  2.5% 0.0% 2.2%

Lab Plastics  1.3% 0.0% 1.2%

Electronic Waste  0.6% 0.0% 0.5%

Scrap Wood  0.3% 0.0% 0.2%

Page 8: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

2016 Solid Non‐Hazardous Waste Audit     Trent University Waste Reduction Group Project P0703    March 2017 

5

Coffee Pods  0.1% 0.0% 0.1%

Styrofoam  0.1% 0.0% 0.1%

Plastic Strapping  0.1% 0.0% 0.1%

Scrap Metal   0.03% 0.6% 0.1%

Printer Toners  0.2% 0.0% 0.2%

Batteries  0.04% 0.2% 0.05%

Total  100% 100% 100%

 Figure 1 summarizes the university’s overall combined garbage composition determined  from the waste audit.  

Figure 1: Overall University Garbage Composition 

  3.2.2 Peterborough Campus Garbage Composition Table 5  summarizes garbage  composition determined  for each building/location at Peterborough Campus.  Table 5: Peterborough Campus – Garbage Composition per Building 

Material 

Cham

plain 

Gzowski 

Environmen

tal 

Science 

Blackburn 

DNA 

Otonabee

 College 

Lady Eaton 

College 

Overall 

Cam

pus 

Mixed Containers  11.3%  11.2%  5.5% 4.0% 4.9% 12.6%  9.5%  9.2%

Mixed Papers  5.8% 6.5%  12.9% 30.6% 8.3% 9.0% 4.4%  8.9%

Cardboard  0.4% 0.5%  0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.7%  0.3%

Paper Towels  10.8%  12.7%  17.4% 17.8% 25.3% 21.2%  23.8%  18.2%

Coffee Cups  3.6% 5.9%  6.3% 7.0% 3.2% 3.8% 7.5%  4.9%

9.2%

9.6%

0.3%

18.0% 5.3%

26.1%

6.2%

20.6%2.2%

1.2%

0.5%

Mixed Containers Mixed Papers Cardboard Paper Towels Coffee Cups Organics

LDPE Plastic Films Non‐recyclable Lab Glass Lab Plastics Electronic Waste

Note: Scrap woods, coffee pods, styrofoam, plastic strapping, scrap metals, printer toners, and batteries not included in graph for clarity since each material present in quantities <=0.2%.

Page 9: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

2016 Solid Non‐Hazardous Waste Audit     Trent University Waste Reduction Group Project P0703    March 2017 

6

Organics  45.2%  29.9%  15.8% 13.6% 11.6% 26.5%  19.8%  25.0%

LDPE Plastic Films  4.3% 4.5%  7.3% 4.0% 12.9% 5.8% 1.7%  6.1%

Non‐recyclable  13.9%  28.5%  19.6% 16.4% 25.1% 20.9%  31.3%  22.1%

Lab Glass  0.0% 0.0%  12.0% 0.0% 2.4% 0.0% 0.0%  2.5%

Lab Plastics  0.0% 0.0%  3.0% 0.0% 5.4% 0.0% 0.0%  1.3%

Electronic Waste  3.5% 0.1%  0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%  0.6%

Scrap Wood  0.9% 0.2%  0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.3%  0.3%

Coffee Pods  0.3% 0.0%  0.0% 0.1% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0%  0.1%

Styrofoam  0.0% 0.0%  0.0% 0.0% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0%  0.1%

Plastic Strapping  0.0% 0.0%  0.3% 1.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%  0.1%

Scrap Metal   0.1% 0.0%  0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1%  0.03%

Printer Toners  0.0% 0.0%  0.0% 5.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%  0.2%

Batteries  0.1% 0.0%  0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%  0.04%

Total  100.0%  100.0%  100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%  100.0%  100.0%

 Figure 2 represents the overall garbage composition determined from Peterborough Campus based on the waste audit results.  

Figure 2: Peterborough Campus Garbage Composition 

  

3.2.3 Durham Campus Garbage Composition Figure 3 represents the garbage composition determined from Durham Campus based on the waste audit results. 

    

9.2%

8.9%

0.3%

18.2%4.9%

25.0%

6.1%

22.1%2.5%

1.3%

0.6%

Mixed Containers Mixed Papers Cardboard Paper Towels Coffee Cups Organics

LDPE Plastic Films Non‐recyclable Lab Glass Lab Plastics Electronic Waste

Note: Scrap woods, coffee pods, styrofoam, plastic strapping and printer toners not included in graph for clarity since each material present in quantities <=0.2%.

Page 10: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

2016 Solid Non‐Hazardous Waste Audit     Trent University Waste Reduction Group Project P0703    March 2017 

7

Figure 3: Durham Campus Garbage Composition 

 Summary  tables and graphs  for each  campus and building per waste generation  functional area, including material composition, weights and percentages, are included in Appendix B.  

3.2.4 Garbage Composition per Functional Area  

3.2.5 Overall Garbage Composition per Functional Area Table 6 summarizes the  largest primary categories  (i.e. >5%) of waste materials generated by the overall university per  functional area based on  the  total amount of garbage sorted  for  the waste audit:  Table 6: Overall University ‐ Primary Material Categories per Functional Area 

Functional Area 

Percent of Sample     

(By Weight)  Organics 

 

Non‐

recyclable 

Paper 

Towels 

Mixed

 

Papers 

Mixed

 

Containers 

LDPE Plastic 

Film

Coffee

 

Cups 

Lab 

Glass 

Lab 

Plastics 

Public Areas  23.7%  32.6%  20.6%  11.6%  10.9%  12.1%  5.8%       

Classrooms  21.3%  24.0%  28.2%  5.3%  10.1%  13.1%  6.7%  12.1%     

Washrooms  17.9%  9.2%  15.0%  57.6%  6.1%  6.1%         

Dining Areas  12.0%  56.4%  15.6%  7.8%  5.7%  8.7%         

Office Areas  11.4%  18.7%  23.2%  8.0%  18.9%  9.2%  9.9%  6.3%     

Complex Labs  11.6%  14.4%  17.3%  15.5%  7.5%    11.3%    19.1%  9.0% 

Food Services  2.1%  50.7%  24.3%  7.5%    7.1%  5.7%       

Total  100.0%  26.1%  20.6%  18.0%  9.6%  9.2%  6.2%  5.3%     

9.5%

15.4%

0.5%15.8%

8.7%

36.5%

6.3%6.5%

Mixed Containers Mixed Papers Cardboard Paper Towels Coffee Cups Organics LDPE Plastic Films Non‐recyclable

Note: Scrap metals and batteries not included in graph for clarity since each material present in quantities <=1.0%.

Page 11: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

2016 Solid Non‐Hazardous Waste Audit     Trent University Waste Reduction Group Project P0703    March 2017 

8

Organic food wastes were found in high quantities in all areas of the university that were audited. An organics program  is  implemented  in some areas on campus. Results suggest  that TrentU may benefit  from  expanding  the  existing  program  in  order  to  capture  more  organic  materials.  In addition, high quantities of paper towels were found in the garbage stream from most areas of the campus,  especially  in  washrooms.  It  is  recommended  that  TrentU  investigate  the  feasibility  of implementing a paper  towel  recycling program. Often paper  towels  can be  combined  in existing organics  and/or  cardboard  programs  depending  on  service  provider  requirements. Alternatively, TrentU may wish  to  investigate  the  feasibility  of  installing  air  dryers  or  re‐useable  linen  rolls  to replace paper towels. Finally, mixed containers and mixed papers were found in the garbage stream from most areas of the campus. TrentU has implemented recycling programs for mixed papers and mixed  containers.  Results  suggest  that  improved  collection  systems  and/or  labels,  program promotion  and/or  improved  student/employee/cleaner  education  may  be  required  to  capture more of these materials.  

3.2.6 Peterborough Campus Garbage Composition per Functional Area Table 7 summarizes the  largest primary categories  (i.e. >5%) of waste materials generated by per functional area based on the total amount of garbage sorted for Peterborough Campus.  Table 7: Peterborough Campus ‐ Primary Material Categories per Functional Area 

Functional Area 

Percent of Sample     

(By Weight)  Organics 

 

Non‐

recyclable 

Paper 

Towels 

Mixed

 

Containers 

Mixed

 

Papers 

LDPE Plastic 

Film

Coffee

 

Cups 

Lab 

Glass 

Lab 

Plastics 

Public Areas  24.2%  31.7%  21.8%  11.8%  12.4%  10.0%  5.8%       

Classrooms  19.8%  22.6%  31.8%    13.9%  7.9%  6.3%  11.7%     

Washrooms  18.7%  9.7%  15.8%  55.9%  6.2%  6.1%         

Complex Labs  12.9%  14.4%  17.3%  15.5%    7.5%  11.3%    19.1%  9.0% 

Office Areas  11.7%  17.9%  24.5%  7.2%  9.4%  20.0%  9.7%  5.8%     

Dining Areas  11.3%  57.3%  18.0%  8.0%  7.7%           

Food Services  1.3%  41.3%  37.4%  10.3%      6.4%       

Total  100.0%  25.0%  22.1%  18.2%  9.2%  8.9%  6.1%       

 

3.2.7 Durham Campus Garbage Composition per Functional Area Table 8 summarizes the  largest primary categories  (i.e. >5%) of waste materials generated by per functional area based on the total amount of garbage sorted for Durham Campus.     

Page 12: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

2016 Solid Non‐Hazardous Waste Audit     Trent University Waste Reduction Group Project P0703    March 2017 

9

Table 8: Durham Campus ‐ Primary Material Categories per Functional Area 

Functional Area 

Percent of Sample     

(By Weight)  Organics 

 

Paper 

Towels 

Mixed

 

Papers 

Mixed

 

Containers 

Coffee

 

Cups 

Non‐

recyclable 

LDPE Plastic 

Film

Scrap 

Metals 

Classrooms  35.5%  31.1%  6.8%  20.8%  8.9%  14.2%  9.6%     

Public Areas  19.0%  42.2%  9.6%  22.0%  8.7%    7.1%  5.8%   

Dining Areas  18.6%  51.2%  6.7%  13.8%  14.2%  7.9%       

Washrooms  10.0%    85.3%  7.1%           

Food Services  8.8%  63.5%      13.1%    6.3%     

Office Areas  8.1%  29.0%  17.9%  5.0%  6.1%  13.3%  6.5%  12.5%  7.2% 

Total  100.0%  36.5%  15.8%  15.4%  9.5%  8.7%  6.5%  6.3%   

 

3.3 Percentage of Recyclables in Garbage O.Reg. 103/94 requires that ‘educational institutions’ source separate the following materials (at a minimum):  

Aluminum food or beverage cans (including cans made primarily of aluminum); 

Cardboard (corrugated); 

Fine paper; 

Glass bottles and jars for food or beverages; 

Newsprint; and  

Steel food or beverage cans (including cans made primarily of steel).  Figure 4  summarizes  the quantity of  these  ‘mandatory’  recyclable materials  found  in  the overall university waste  audit  garbage  samples  compared  to  ‘other  recyclable’ materials  (i.e.  organics, paper towels, etc) and ‘non‐recyclable’ materials.     

Page 13: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

2016 Solid Non‐Hazardous Waste Audit     Trent University Waste Reduction Group Project P0703    March 2017 

10

Figure 4: Overall University Percent Recyclables in Garbage Stream 

  The data suggests that TrentU has a low ‘mandatory’ recyclable content (i.e. 5.4%) in the combined garbage  of  the  university.  The  main  ‘mandatory’  recyclable  material  was  fine  paper.  ‘Other Recyclables’ represented 74.0% of the sample and consisted mainly of organics, paper towels, other recyclable paper fibres and LDPE plastic films. Non‐recyclables represented approximately 20.6% of the sample.  Figures  5  and  6  summarize  the  quantity  of  ‘mandatory’  recyclable  materials  found  in  the Peterborough  Campus  and  Durham  Campus  garbage  samples  compared  to  ‘other  recyclable’ materials (i.e. organics, paper towels, etc) and ‘non‐recyclable’ materials. 

 Peterborough  Campus  had  a  low  ‘mandatory’  recyclable  content  (i.e.  5.0%)  in  the  combined garbage  of  the  campus.  The  main  ‘mandatory’  recyclable  material  was  fine  paper.  ‘Other Recyclables’ represented 72.8% of the sample and consisted mainly of organics, paper towels, other recyclable paper fibres and LDPE plastic films. Non‐recyclables represented approximately 22.1% of the sample.  Durham  Campus  had  a  ‘mandatory’  recyclable  content  of  8.4%  in  the  combined  garbage  of  the campus. The main ‘mandatory’ recyclable material was newsprint. ‘Other Recyclables’ represented 85.1% of the sample and consisted mainly of organics, paper towels, coffee cups and LDPE plastic films. Non‐recyclables represented approximately 6.5% of the sample.   

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Office Areas

Public Areas

Classrooms

Washrooms

Food Services

Dining Areas

Complex Labs

Total

Mandatory Recyclables (Reg103) Other Recyclables Non‐Recyclable

Page 14: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

2016 Solid Non‐Hazardous Waste Audit     Trent University Waste Reduction Group Project P0703    March 2017 

11

Figure 5: Peterborough Campus ‐ Percent Recyclables in Garbage Stream 

  

Figure 6: Durham Campus ‐ Percent Recyclables in Garbage Stream 

    

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Office Areas

Public Areas

Classrooms

Washrooms

Food Services

Dining Areas

Complex Labs

Total

Mandatory Recyclables (Reg103) Other Recyclables Non‐Recyclable

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Office Areas

Public Areas

Classrooms

Washrooms

Food Services

Dining Areas

Total

Mandatory Recyclables (Reg103) Other Recyclables Non‐Recyclable

Page 15: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

2016 Solid Non‐Hazardous Waste Audit     Trent University Waste Reduction Group Project P0703    March 2017 

12

4 Diversion Programs & Waste Systems  4.1 Waste Diversion Programs 

Waste diversion programs have been  implemented at TrentU  to  reduce/reuse/recycle/compost a wide range of materials as described below.  Cardboard:  Cardboard  recycling  is  provided  across  campus.  Cardboard  boxes  are  flattened  and placed  in  dedicated  bins.  Cardboard  bins  at  the  Peterborough  campus  and Durham  campus  are serviced by Progressive Waste and Miller Waste respectively.   Mixed Containers: Mixed containers  include assorted plastics  food and beverage containers  (PET, HDPE, LDPE, PP, and PS), aluminum and metal cans, glass food and beverage containers, gable top containers and aseptic containers  (i.e. tetra paks, etc). Mixed containers are collected throughout campus  in  dedicated  recycle  depots,  primarily  concentrated  in  high  waste  generating  areas. Collected materials are disposed into 95 gallon totes by staff and/or students. Totes are serviced at the  Peterborough  campus  and  Durham  campus  by  Progressive  Waste  and  Miller  Waste respectively.  Mixed Papers: Mixed papers include a range of items such items as (but not limited to) newspapers, fine  papers,  envelopes,  magazines,  brochures,  boxboard,  packing  paper,  shipping/receiving supplies, paper bags and other clean food paper products. Mixed papers are collected throughout campus  in  dedicated  recycle  depots,  primarily  concentrated  in  high  waste  generating  areas. Collected materials are disposed into 95 gallon totes by staff and/or students. Totes are serviced at the  Peterborough  campus  and  Durham  campus  by  Progressive  Waste  and  Miller  Waste respectively.  Confidential  Papers:  Confidential  papers  are  collected  mainly  in  office/administrative  areas  in secure consoles or totes. All shredded materials were recycled.  Organics: Organic  based  food waste  is  collected  in  some  locations  for  composting.  An  organics program is not implemented at the Durham campus.  Scrap Metals:  Recyclable metals  are  collected  by  TrentU  staff.  Scrap metal  recycling  service  is provided by Progressive Waste as required at the Peterborough campus.  Scrap Woods/Pallets: Recyclable woods are collected by TrentU staff. Scrap wood recycling service is provided by Progressive Waste as required at the Peterborough campus. Reusable wood pallets are also returned to suppliers or taken for use off‐property.  Oil  &  Grease:  Oil  &  grease  is  collected  from  food  service  areas  across  campus,  and  stored  in dedicated containers. Service in 2016 was provided by Sanimax and Rex Services as required at the Peterborough campus and Durham campus respectively.  

Page 16: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

2016 Solid Non‐Hazardous Waste Audit     Trent University Waste Reduction Group Project P0703    March 2017 

13

Electronics  Wastes:  Electronic  wastes  are  collected  across  campus  and  stored  in  dedicated locations. Service is provided as required.  Bulbs & Ballasts: Fluorescent bulbs and ballasts are collected across campus and stored in dedicated totes. Service is provided as required.  Batteries: Batteries are collected  in small dedicated containers across campus. Collected batteries are stored in dedicated totes. Service is provided as required. 

Printer Toner Cartridges: Printer  toners are collected across campus and  to suppliers  for reuse as required. 

Yard Wastes: TrentU Durham campus grasscycles which involves leaving yard clippings on‐site after lawn cutting.  Donations/Swap Shop: Used material programs are implemented at TrentU including used furniture and clothing donations, as well as the operation of an on‐campus Swap Shop.  LCBO/Beer Store Returns: Used liquor, wine and beer bottles are returned to the LCBO/Beer Store. It is unknown how many cases are returned annually.  Reduction Programs: TrentU has added a number of waste reduction programs on campus. These include water bottle  filling stations, double‐sided printing options on printers/photocopiers and a reusable mug discount program  in  food service areas.  In addition, TrentU started charging $1  for take‐out boat containers, which caused a reduction in the amount of containers used by students.  Table 9 summarizes the estimated annual amount of waste materials diverted from landfills due to waste diversion programs implemented at the university (based on latest available annual data).     

Page 17: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

2016 Solid Non‐Hazardous Waste Audit     Trent University Waste Reduction Group Project P0703    March 2017 

14

Table 9: Waste Diversion Summary 

Waste Material Diversion Program 

Peterborough Campus  

Durham Campus 

Total Diversion 

Tonnes Tonnes Tonnes  Percent of Total Diversion 

Cardboard  Recycled  499.98 4.89 504.87  39.7%

Mixed Containers  Recycled  365.37 0.70 366.07  28.8%

Mixed Papers  Recycled  280.59 2.75 283.34  22.3%

Organics  Recycled  50.38 ‐‐ 50.38  4.0%

Confidential Papers  Recycled  18.00 0.42 18.42  1.4%

Scrap Wood  Recycled  16.53 ‐‐ 16.53  1.3%

Scrap Metals  Recycled  15.47 ‐‐ 15.47  1.2%

Swap Shop  Reused  9.86 ‐‐ 9.86  0.8%

Oil & Grease  Recycled  5.15 0.16 5.31  0.4%

Batteries  Recycled  0.36 0.20 0.56  0.04%

Wood Pallets  Reused  0.45 ‐‐ 0.45  0.04%

Printer Toners  Reused  0.50 0.01 0.51  0.04%

Bulbs & Ballasts  Reused  0.00 0.20 0.20  0.02%

Reduction Initiatives  Reduced  0.12 ‐‐ 0.12  0.01%

Total Diverted    1262.76 9.34 1272.10  100%

 Therefore, the total amount of waste material diverted from landfill was approximately 1272 metric tonnes. Evidence of annual quantity data obtained from TrentU and/or service providers is provided in  Appendix  A.  Waste  diversion  programs  implemented  on  campus  exceed  the  minimum requirements of O.Reg.103/94 for educational institutions.  

4.2 Waste Disposal Systems 

Regular  solid  non‐hazardous  waste  is  collected  across  campus  by  TrentU  staff  and  placed  in dedicated bins located in designated waste handling areas. Progressive Waste Solutions services the Peterborough campus  (approximately 287.22 MT) and Miller Waste  services  the Durham campus (approximately 6.70 MT). The total quantity of solid non‐hazardous waste disposed to  landfill was estimated to be approximately 293.92 metric tonnes.  

4.3 Waste Diversion Rate Waste Diversion Rate is the percentage of waste materials that a facility diverts from landfill due to reduce, reuse and recycling (i.e. 3Rs) initiatives versus the total amount of waste generated (i.e. 3Rs plus  disposed).  According  to  the Ontario Ministry  of  the  Environment, Waste  Diversion  Rate  is calculated as follows:  

%100*)3(

GeneratedWasteTotal

RsDivertedWasteTotalRateDiversionWaste

  Based on the total annual amount of waste generated and materials reduced, reused and recycled at Trent University, the overall 2016 waste diversion rate was determined to be approximately 81%. Table 10 summarizes the quantities of wastes diverted and disposed. TrentU’s 2016 waste diversion 

Page 18: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

2016 Solid Non‐Hazardous Waste Audit     Trent University Waste Reduction Group Project P0703    March 2017 

15

rate exceeds the Ministry of the Environment & Climate Change’s provincial objective of 60% (to be achieved by  the  year  2008). Waste diversion  rates  for  the Peterborough  and Durham  campuses were determined to be 81.5% and 58.2% respectively.  Table 10: Waste Diversion Rate Summary 

Material Stream  Peterborough Campus  Durham Campus  Overall University 

  Annual Total  Annual Total  Annual Total 

  Tonnes  Percent  Tonnes  Percent  Tonnes  Percent 

Disposed to Landfill  287.22  18.5%  6.70  41.8%  293.92  18.8% 

Materials Reduced  0.12  0.01%  ‐‐  ‐‐  0.12  0.01% 

Materials Reused  10.81  0.7%  0.01  0.1%  10.82  0.7% 

Materials Recycled  1201.45  77.5%  9.33  58.2%  1210.79  77.3% 

Materials Composted  50.38  3.3%  ‐‐  ‐‐  50.38  3.2% 

Total Waste Generated  1549.98  100%  16.04  100%  1566.02  100% 

WASTE DIVERSION RATE    81.5%    58.2%    81.2% 

 

4.4 Capture Rate Capture  rate  is  the proportion of divertible waste materials which are  successfully diverted  from disposal compared  to  the  total amount of  the divertible waste materials generated. According  to the Recycling Council of Ontario, Capture Rate is calculated as follows:  

%100*)3(

GeneratedMaterialDivertibleTotal

RsCapturedMaterialDivertibleTotalRateCapture

  Thus,  capture  rate  assists  in  determining  the  effectiveness  of  recycling  programs.  Table  11 summarizes the capture rate for the main divertible materials at the university.  Table 11: Capture Rate Summary 

  Peterborough Campus  Durham Campus  Overall University 

Divertible Material  Generated  Diverted Capture Rate 

Generated  Diverted Capture Rate 

Generated  Diverted Capture Rate 

  MT  MT  %  MT  MT  %  MT  MT  % 

Cardboard  500.88  499.98  99.8%  4.92  4.89  99.4%  505.81  504.87  99.8% 

Mixed Containers  391.65  365.37  93.3%  1.34  0.70  52.4%  392.99  366.07  93.1% 

Mixed Papers  324.21  298.58  92.1%  4.21  3.18  75.5%  328.41  301.76  91.9% 

Organics  122.07  50.38  41.3%  2.45  0.00  0.0%  124.51  50.38  40.5% 

Confidential Papers  18.00  18.00  100.0%  0.42  0.42  100.0%  18.42  18.42  100.0% 

Scrap Metals  15.56  15.47  99.4%  0.04  0.00  0.0%  15.60  15.47  99.2% 

Swap Shop  9.86  9.86  100.0%  0.00  0.00  ‐‐  9.86  9.86  100.0% 

Oil & Grease  5.15  5.15  100.0%  0.16  0.16  100.0%  5.31  5.31  100.0% 

Scrap Wood/Pallets  17.70  16.98  95.9%  0.00  0.00  ‐‐  17.70  16.98  95.9% 

Batteries  0.47  0.36  77.7%  0.21  0.20  94.5%  0.68  0.56  82.9% 

Printer Toners  1.03  0.50  48.4%  0.01  0.01  100.0%  1.04  0.51  48.9% 

Bulbs & Ballasts  0.00  0.00  ‐‐  0.20  0.20  100.0%  0.20  0.20  100.0% 

Reduction Initiatives  0.12  0.12  100.0%  0.00  0.00  ‐‐  0.12  0.12  100.0% 

Total   1406.70  1280.75  91.0%  13.97  9.77  69.9%  1420.66  1290.52  90.8% 

Page 19: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

2016 Solid Non‐Hazardous Waste Audit     Trent University Waste Reduction Group Project P0703    March 2017 

16

Overall, capture rates of most materials were quite high ranging from approximately 83% to 100%. Organics  and printer  toners had  the  lowest  values of  40.5%  and  48.9%  respectively.  The overall capture rate of all recyclables for the overall university was determined to be 90.8%.  Capture  rates  at  Peterborough  Campus  were  quite  high  for  most  materials  ranging  from approximately 78% to 100%. Organics and printer toners had the lowest values of 41.3% and 48.4% respectively. Capture rates at Durham Campus were also quite high for most materials ranging from approximately 76% to 100%. Mixed containers had the lowest value of 52.4%.   

4.5 Year over Year Change in Waste Generation Waste  diversion  rate  and  capture  rate  do  not  always  demonstrate  how  effective  a  site’s  3R programs are operating. This is due to the continual change of many important factors involved in waste and  recyclable material generation on campus,  such as number of  students enrolled,  floor area  of  buildings,  etc. As  student  numbers  change  or more  buildings  are  added  to  the  campus, quantities of waste and recyclables change making  it difficult to have a direct comparison of data between  years.  It  is  recommended  that  TrentU  start  tracking  ‘Year  over  Year’  changes  in  the amount  of  wastes  disposed  and/or  materials  recycled  per  standard  unit.  This  allows  direct comparison of data from year to year, thus assisting the university  in gaining an understanding of the effectiveness of their waste diversion programs. For TrentU, the most applicable standard unit is Full‐time equivalent students, or FTE. This analysis was also conducted for the overall university.  

4.5.1 Year‐over‐Year Change in Diverted Quantities The  ‘Year‐over‐Year  Change  in  Diverted Quantities’  is  the  indicator  of  the  amount  of materials diverted  from  disposal  through  reduce,  reuse  and/or  recycle  activities  per  FTE  compared  to previous data. Table 12 summarizes the results for the 2016 year. A positive year‐over‐year change indicates waste diversion programs are improving over time.  Table 12: Yr‐over‐Yr Change in Waste Diversion Quantities 

Period  Total Materials Diverted (MT) 

FTE  Annual Diverted Quantity (kg/FTE) 

Yr‐over‐Yr Change in Diverted Quantity (kg) 

2016  1253.50  8475.15  147.90  ‐‐ 

 

4.5.2 Year‐over‐Year Change in Garbage Disposed The  ‘Year over Year Change  in Garbage Disposed’  is  the  indicator of  the amount of  reduction  in waste  materials  disposed  to  landfill  due  to  waste  diversion  activities  on  campus.  Table  13 summarizes the results for the 2016 year. A reduction in the year over year value will indicate the university is continually reducing wastes disposed to landfill.  Table 13: Yr‐over‐Yr Change in Garbage Disposed 

Period  Total Materials Disposed to Landfill (MT) 

FTE  Annual Disposed Quantity (kg/FTE) 

Yr‐over‐Yr Change in Disposed Quantity (kg) 

2016  308.87  8475.15  36.44  ‐‐ 

         

Page 20: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

2016 Solid Non‐Hazardous Waste Audit     Trent University Waste Reduction Group Project P0703    March 2017 

17

5 Waste Audit Summary & Waste Reduction Work Plan Refer to Appendix C and Appendix D for the Waste Audit Summary and the Waste Reduction Work Plan for Peterborough Campus. Refer to Appendix E and Appendix F for the Waste Audit Summary and the Waste Reduction Work Plan for Durham Campus. The last page of each set of forms in the appendices need to be signed by an authorized person at the University.   According to O.Reg. 102/94, the Waste Reduction Work Plans (Appendix D & F) or a summary of the plans must be posted at the University in a place where staff/students can review it. If a summary is posted, the entire Work Plan should also be made available  for review by any staff/student upon request. 

 

6 Conclusions & Recommendations 

Based on  the  results of  the solid non‐hazardous waste audit conducted  for TrentU,  the  following conclusions  can  be made.  Recommendations  presented  below  are  intended  to  assist  TrentU  in maximizing their waste diversion potential. 

In 2016, it was estimated that TrentU disposed an overall total of approximately 293.92 tonnes of  solid waste  in  landfills.  Approximately  1272.10  tonnes  of waste materials were  diverted through  existing  waste  diversion  programs.  This  represents  a  waste  diversion  rate  of approximately 81.2%. The provincial objective is 60% diversion to be achieved by 2008. 

Waste  diversion  rates  for  the  Peterborough  and  Durham  campuses were  determined  to  be 81.5% and 58.2% respectively 

TrentU  maintains  waste  diversion  programs  for  cardboard,  mixed  containers,  mixed  papers, confidential  papers,  organics,  scrap  metals,  scrap  woods,  electronics,  bulbs,  batteries,  printer toners,  oil  and  grease,  yard wastes, wood  pallet  reuse,  donations/Swap  Shop,  LCBO/Beer  Store returns and waste reduction  initiatives  including water bottle filling stations, double sided printing 

policies, refillable coffee mug program and take‐out boat reductions. These programs exceed the requirements of O.Reg.103/94 for educational institutions. 

Overall, TrentU had a low ‘mandatory’ recyclable content (i.e. 5.4%) in the combined garbage of the university.  The main  ‘mandatory’  recyclable material was  fine paper.  ‘Other Recyclables’ represented  74.0%  of  the  sample  and  consisted  mainly  of  organics,  paper  towels,  other recyclable  paper  fibres  and  LDPE  plastic  films.  Non‐recyclables  represented  approximately 20.6% of the sample. 

Peterborough Campus had  a  low  ‘mandatory’  recyclable  content  (i.e. 5.0%)  in  the  combined garbage  of  the  campus.  The  main  ‘mandatory’  recyclable  material  was  fine  paper.  ‘Other Recyclables’ represented 72.8% of the sample and consisted mainly of organics, paper towels, other recyclable paper fibres and LDPE plastic films. Non‐recyclables represented approximately 22.1% of the sample. 

Durham Campus had a ‘mandatory’ recyclable content of 8.4% in the combined garbage of the campus.  The  main  ‘mandatory’  recyclable  material  was  newsprint.  ‘Other  Recyclables’ represented 85.1% of the sample and consisted mainly of organics, paper towels, coffee cups and LDPE plastic films. Non‐recyclables represented approximately 6.5% of the sample. 

Page 21: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

2016 Solid Non‐Hazardous Waste Audit     Trent University Waste Reduction Group Project P0703    March 2017 

18

Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste  audit  sample  weight  respectively.  Otonabee  College,  Environmental  Science  and Champlain buildings generated the most garbage at the Peterborough Campus.  

At  the  Peterborough  campus,  public  areas,  classrooms  and washrooms  generated  the most garbage. At the Durham Campus, classrooms, public areas and dining areas generated the most garbage. When  considering  the  overall  university,  public  areas,  classrooms  and  washrooms generated the most garbage. 

Overall,  capture  rates of most materials were quite high  ranging  from approximately 83%  to 100%. Organics and printer toners had the lowest values of 40.5% and 48.9% respectively. The overall capture rate of all recyclables for the overall university was determined to be 90.8%. 

Capture  rates  at  Peterborough  Campus  were  quite  high  for  most  materials  ranging  from approximately 78%  to 100%. Organics and printer  toners had  the  lowest values of 41.3% and 48.4% respectively. Capture rates at Durham Campus were also quite high  for most materials ranging from approximately 76% to 100%. Mixed containers had the lowest value of 52.4%. 

Based  on  the  overall waste  audit  results,  it was  estimated  that  approximately  26.1%  (or  77 tonnes)  of  solid waste  disposed  to  landfill  consisted  of  organic materials  (i.e.  food wastes). Organics were  found  in  relatively high amounts  in garbage  streams  from all  functional areas, and especially high in food service/dining areas. An organics compost program exists at TrentU’s Peterborough  Campus  in  some  designated  areas.  The  results  suggest  that  an  expanded program,  improved  collection  systems,  improved  signage  and/or  student/staff  education programs may be required to improve the capture rate of this material. It is recommended that the  organics  program  be  introduced  to  Durham  Campus.  Organics  are  not  a  mandatory recyclable material per O.Reg.103/94. 

Based  on  the  overall waste  audit  results,  it was  estimated  that  approximately  18.0%  (or  53 tonnes)  of  solid  waste  disposed  to  landfill  consisted  of  paper  towels.  TrentU may  wish  to investigate the feasibility of  implementing a paper towel recycling program at both campuses. Often  it can be combined with an existing cardboard and/or organics program depending on hauler  requirements. Alternatively, TrentU may wish  to  investigate  the  feasibility of  replacing paper  towels with  automatic  air  dryers  and/or  reusable  linen  rolls.  Paper  towels  are  not  a mandatory recyclable per O.Reg.103/94. 

Based  on  the  overall waste  audit  results,  it was  estimated  that  approximately  9.6%  (or  28 tonnes) of  solid waste disposed  to  landfill consisted of mixed papers  (fine papers, newsprint, boxboard,  etc). Office  areas,  classrooms  and  public  areas  generated  the  highest  quantity  of mixed papers. A mixed paper recycling program exists at TrentU. This data suggests that better collection systems, improved signage and/or student/staff education programs may be required to  improve  the  capture  rate  of  this  material.  Fine  papers  and  newsprint  are  mandatory recyclables per O.Reg.103/94. 

Based on  the waste audit results,  it was estimated  that approximately 9.2%  (or 27  tonnes) of solid waste disposed to landfill consisted of mixed containers (aluminum cans, glass jars, plastic bottles,  tetra  packs,  milk  cartons,  etc).  Classrooms,  public  and  dining  areas  generated  the highest quantities of mixed containers. A mixed container recycling program exists at TrentU. 

Page 22: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

2016 Solid Non‐Hazardous Waste Audit     Trent University Waste Reduction Group Project P0703    March 2017 

19

The  data  suggests  that  better  collection  systems,  improved  signage  and/or  student/staff education  programs  may  be  required  to  improve  the  capture  rate  of  this  material.  Glass, aluminum and steel food and beverage containers are mandatory recyclables per O.Reg.103/94. 

It  is recommended that a study be conducted to verify mixed container and mixed paper tote weights as well as to conduct an inventory of bins on‐campus. It is recommended that the total number of totes picked‐up per week be verified (per season to account for temporal variability). 

It is recommended that a study be conducted to verify cardboard weights recycled on‐campus. 

It  is recommended  that a study be conducted  to verify organic weights as well  to conduct an inventory of bins on‐campus.  It  is recommended that the total number of totes picked‐up per week be verified. 

It  is  recommended  that  TrentU  conduct  studies  to  add  and  improve  reduction  and  reuse weights to improve the university’s diversion rate. For example, waste reduction credits can be calculated  for the university’s double‐sided printing policy, refillable water bottle stations and clothing donation programs. Tracking of LCBO/Beer Store returns should be kept on file. 

Continue  to  make  use  of  multi‐compartment  containers  (i.e.  recycling  depots)  for  waste collection and recycling as much as possible. Remove all “solitary” waste bins on campus. We recommend  only  having  waste  bins  that  are  attached  to  or  close  to  multi‐compartment recycling containers. 

It is recommended that signs be continually updated on all garbage and recycling bins to assist students/staff  in  sorting  wastes  easily  and  correctly.  Signs  should  be  easily  visible  and instructive,  such as  those having pictograms.  Signs are a  very effective method of  increasing participation, reducing contamination and increasing capture rate. 

Ensure TrentU’s Environmental Policy is clearly visible in all common areas throughout campus. Emphasize TrentU’s  commitment  to environmental  stewardship  in  its newsletters, brochures, annual  reports  and  contracts.  Regular  newsletters  promoting  the  school’s  waste  reduction programs, goals and concerns will increase student/staff cooperation. 

Continue  to  increase  awareness  of  current  recycling  programs  through  staff  and  student education programs. Such programs can include brief training programs as well as placement of posters  in strategic  locations around campus, and posting  information regarding campus goals and  recycling,  reuse,  and  reduction  rates  at  the  school. A  suggestion  box may  be  helpful  in communicating  student/staff  concerns and  suggestions when developing or  changing existing diversion programs. 

It  is  important  that all  staff and  students at TrentU be made aware of all available  recycling programs. TrentU staff should provide easy access to contact information for questions and/or help  regarding  the  various  recycling programs.  The  recycling programs  should have  as much consistency as possible across campus. 

Throughout  the year, waste should be collected  in clear plastic garbage bags  instead of black garbage  bags.  This  practice  allows  cleaning  staff  to monitor waste  collection,  as well  as  to ensure that separated waste streams are disposed of  in the correct containers/areas. Some of 

Page 23: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

2016 Solid Non‐Hazardous Waste Audit     Trent University Waste Reduction Group Project P0703    March 2017 

20

our  clients  find  it beneficial  to use  clear bags  that have a  slight blue  tint  for use  in  recycling containers. 

Support  and  encourage  the  purchase  and  use  of  “environmentally  friendly”,  reusable  or recyclable materials and packaging, and/or those that contain recycled content. 

In order to be successful, the waste diversion program must have the full support of TrentU’s management team. 

According to O.Reg. 102/94, the Waste Reduction Work Plans (Appendix D & F) or a summary of the plan must be posted at the facility  in a place where  it can be viewed.  If a summary of the work plan is posted, the full Work Plan must be made available for review upon request by any of the university’s staff or students. 

The waste audit report and waste reduction work plan must be retained on file for a minimum of five years. 

A waste audit report and waste reduction work plan must be conducted and updated annually.

Page 24: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

Appendix A

Supporting Documentation

Page 25: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

1

Environmental Protection Act Loi sur la protection de l’environnement

ONTARIO REGULATION 102/94

WASTE AUDITS AND WASTE REDUCTION WORK PLANS

Consolidation Period: From March 3, 1994 to the e-Laws currency date.

No amendments.

This Regulation is made in English only.

PART I GENERAL

1. In this Regulation,

“waste” means municipal waste as defined in Regulation 347 of the Revised Regulations of Ontario, 1990;

“waste audit” means a study relating to waste;

“waste reduction work plan” means a plan to reduce, reuse and recycle waste. O. Reg. 102/94, s. 1.

2. A waste audit required under this Regulation shall address,

(a) the amount, nature and composition of the waste;

(b) the manner by which the waste gets produced, including management decisions and policies that relate to the production of waste; and

(c) the way in which the waste is managed. O. Reg. 102/94, s. 2.

3. (1) A waste reduction work plan required under this Regulation shall include, to the extent that is reasonable, plans to reduce, reuse and recycle waste and shall set out who will implement each part of the plan, when each part will be implemented and what the expected results are.

(2) In developing the work plan, regard shall be had to the following principles:

1. Reduction is the first objective.

2. If reduction is not possible, then reuse is the next objective.

3. If reduction and reuse are not possible, then recycling is the final objective. O. Reg. 102/94, s. 3.

4. A person who is required under this Regulation to prepare a report of a waste audit or a waste reduction work plan shall prepare it on a form provided by the Ministry or in the same format as such a form. O. Reg. 102/94, s. 4.

5. (1) A person who is required under this Regulation to prepare a report of a waste audit or a waste reduction work plan shall retain a copy of the report or plan for at least five years after it was prepared.

(2) A person who is required under this Regulation to prepare a report of a waste audit or a waste reduction work plan shall submit to the Director, on request, the required report or plan, within seven days of the Director requesting them. O. Reg. 102/94, s. 5.

6. (1) A person who becomes subject to an obligation under this Regulation to prepare a report of a waste audit or a waste reduction work plan shall do so within six months of becoming subject to the obligation.

(2) This section does not apply with respect to updated reports or plans.

(3) This section does not apply with respect to obligations of a builder under Part IV or a demolisher under Part V. O. Reg. 102/94, s. 6.

7. (1) A new owner or operator to whom this Regulation applies is not required to conduct a new waste audit or prepare a new waste reduction work plan if an audit or work plan was conducted or prepared by a previous owner or operator and the new owner or operator updates the audit and work plan as required under this Regulation.

(2) This section does not apply with respect to a builder under Part IV or a demolisher under Part V. O. Reg. 102/94, s. 7.

8. (1) A person who has an obligation to conduct a waste audit and prepare a report under Part II, III, VI, VII, VIII, IX, X or XI in respect of more than one retail shopping establishment, retail shopping complex, building, restaurant, hotel or motel, hospital, location or campus of an educational institution, or site of a manufacturing establishment, may conduct a single

Admin
Text Box
Partial copy of O.Reg.102/94
Admin
Highlight
Page 26: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

6

50. The waste reduction work plan shall include measures for communicating the plan to the operator’s employees who work at the hospital and, as a minimum, those measures shall require,

(a) that the plan or a summary be posted in places where most employees will see it; and

(b) if a summary is posted, that any employee who requests to look at the plan be allowed to do so. O. Reg. 102/94, s. 50.

PART X EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS

51. (1) This Part applies to the operator of an educational institution in respect of a location or campus of the institution if, at the location or campus, at any time during the calendar year, more than 350 persons are enrolled.

(2) This Part continues to apply in respect of a location or campus for the two calendar years following the last year in which more than 350 persons were enrolled at the location or campus. O. Reg. 102/94, s. 51.

52. (1) The operator shall conduct a waste audit covering the waste generated by the operation of the institution at the location or campus. The audit shall also address the extent to which materials or products used consist of recycled or reused materials or products.

(2) After conducting the waste audit, the operator shall prepare a written report of the audit.

(3) In every year following the initial waste audit, the operator shall update the audit and prepare an updated written report. O. Reg. 102/94, s. 52.

53. (1) The operator shall prepare a written waste reduction work plan, based on the waste audit, to reduce, reuse and recycle waste generated by the operation of the institution at the location or campus.

(2) In every year following the preparation of the initial waste reduction work plan, the operator shall prepare an updated written plan. O. Reg. 102/94, s. 53.

54. The operator shall implement the waste reduction work plan as updated. O. Reg. 102/94, s. 54.

55. The waste reduction work plan shall include measures for communicating the plan to the operator’s employees who work at the location or campus and, as a minimum, those measures shall require,

(a) that the plan or a summary be posted in places where most employees will see it; and

(b) if a summary is posted, that any employee who requests to look at the plan be allowed to do so. O. Reg. 102/94, s. 55.

PART XI LARGE MANUFACTURING ESTABLISHMENTS

56. (1) This Part applies to the owner or operator of a site that is a manufacturing establishment.

(2) This Part does not apply to an owner of a site in a particular calendar year if,

(a) during the two preceding calendar years there was no calendar month in which the hours worked by the persons employed at the site exceeded 16,000 hours; and

(b) the owner is able to demonstrate this fact, within seven days of a request from the Director, through evidence satisfactory to the Director.

(3) Copies of the records related to hours of employment maintained under section 11 of the Employment Standards Act shall be deemed to be sufficient evidence of hours worked at a site if the copies are certified by the owner or the owner’s representative as to the accuracy of the records.

(4) In this Part,

“owner” includes the operator of a manufacturing establishment but does not include a landlord;

“site” means one property and includes nearby properties owned or leased by the same person where passage from one property to another involves crossing, but not travelling along, a public highway. O. Reg. 102/94, s. 56.

57. (1) The owner shall conduct a waste audit covering the waste generated by the operation of the establishment at the site. The audit shall also address the extent to which materials or products used or sold consist of recycled or reused materials or products.

(2) After conducting the waste audit, the owner shall prepare a written report of the audit.

(3) In every year following the initial waste audit, the owner shall update the audit and prepare an updated written report. O. Reg. 102/94, s. 57.

58. (1) The owner shall prepare a written waste reduction work plan, based on the waste audit, to reduce, reuse and recycle waste generated by the operation of the establishment.

(2) In every year following the preparation of the initial waste reduction work plan, the owner shall prepare an updated written plan. O. Reg. 102/94, s. 58.

Stephen Kuchma
Highlight
Stephen Kuchma
Highlight
Page 27: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

Environmental Protection Act Loi sur la protection de l’environnement

ONTARIO REGULATION 103/94

INDUSTRIAL, COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL SOURCE SEPARATION PROGRAMS

Consolidation Period: From March 3, 1994 to the e-Laws currency date.

No amendments.

This Regulation is made in English only.

SOURCE SEPARATION PROGRAMS

1. In this Regulation,

“Northern Ontario” means the territorial districts of Algoma, Cochrane, Kenora, Manitoulin, Nipissing, Parry Sound, Rainy River, Sudbury, Thunder Bay and Timiskaming and The Regional Municipality of Sudbury;

“source separation program” means a program to facilitate the source separation of waste for reuse or recycling. O. Reg. 103/94, s. 1.

2. (1) A source separation program required under this Regulation must include,

(a) the provision of facilities for the collection, handling and storage of source separated wastes described in subsection (2) adequate for the quantities of anticipated wastes;

(b) measures to ensure that the source separated wastes that are collected are removed;

(c) the provision of information to users and potential users of the program,

(i) describing the performance of the program,

(ii) encouraging effective source separation of waste and full use of the program;

(d) reasonable efforts to ensure that full use is made of the program and that the separated waste is reused or recycled.

(2) The source separated waste referred to in clause (1) (a) is waste that has been source separated from other kinds of waste and that consists solely of waste from one or more of the following categories:

1. The categories of waste set out in the part of the Schedule applicable to the person required to implement the source separation program.

2. The categories of waste set out in Schedule 1, 2 or 3 of Ontario Regulation 101/94 that the source separation program accepts.

(3) A source separation program required under this Regulation must provide for all the categories of waste set out in the part of the Schedule applicable to the person required to implement the program except for categories of waste that cannot be reasonably anticipated. O. Reg. 103/94, s. 2.

Page 1 of 10Environmental Protection Act - O. Reg. 103/94

14/01/2008http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/regs/english/elaws_regs_940103_e.htm

Admin
Text Box
Partial copy of O.Reg.103/94
Admin
Highlight
Admin
Highlight
Page 28: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

3. Source separation programs required by this Regulation are exempt from sections 27, 40 and 41 of the Act. O. Reg. 103/94, s. 3.

4. (1) A source separation program that is not required by this Regulation is exempt from sections 27, 40 and 41 of the Act if,

(a) the program is restricted to waste generated at a single site;

(b) the program only accepts waste that has been source separated from other kinds of waste and that consists solely of waste from one or more of the categories of waste set out in Schedule 1, 2 or 3 of Ontario Regulation 101/94;

(c) the program includes everything set out in subsection 2 (1).

(2) For the purposes of clause (1) (c), the reference to source separated waste in clause 2 (1) (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the waste described in clause (1) (b). O. Reg. 103/94, s. 4.

RETAIL SHOPPING ESTABLISHMENTS

5. (1) This section applies to the owner of an establishment that sells goods or services at retail to persons who come to the establishment if,

(a) the establishment occupies premises with a floor area of at least 10,000 square metres; or

(b) the establishment occupies premises in a complex in respect of which section 6 applies and the owner of the establishment is solely responsible for the establishment’s waste management.

(2) The owner shall implement a source separation program for the wastes generated by the establishment or shall ensure that such a program is implemented.

(3) This section applies only in respect of an establishment located within a local municipality that has a population of at least 5,000.

(4) This section takes effect with respect to an establishment in Northern Ontario on July 1, 1996. O. Reg. 103/94, s. 5.

RETAIL SHOPPING COMPLEXES

6. (1) This section applies to the owner of a complex that contains premises occupied by establishments that sell goods or services at retail to persons who come to the establishments if the total floor area of such premises is at least 10,000 square metres.

(2) The owner shall implement a source separation program for the wastes generated at the complex or shall ensure that such a program is implemented.

(3) The source separation program need not provide for the waste generated in the operation of an establishment in the complex if section 5 applies to the owner of the establishment.

(4) This section applies only in respect of a complex located in a local municipality that has a population of at least 5,000.

(5) This section takes effect with respect to a complex in Northern Ontario on July 1, 1996. O. Reg. 103/94, s. 6.

Page 2 of 10Environmental Protection Act - O. Reg. 103/94

14/01/2008http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/regs/english/elaws_regs_940103_e.htm

Page 29: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

(c) a building in respect of which section 9 applies;

(d) a hotel or motel in respect of which section 12 applies;

(e) a hospital in respect of which section 13 applies;

(f) a location or campus of an educational institution in respect of which section 14 applies.

(4) This section does not apply to an owner of a restaurant in a particular calendar year if,

(a) during the two preceding calendar years there was no year in which the gross sales for all restaurants operated by the owner in Ontario equalled or exceeded $3,000,000; and

(b) the owner is able to demonstrate this fact, within seven days of a request from the Director, through evidence satisfactory to the Director.

(5) Copies of the records related to purchase and sale maintained under subsection 5 (1) of Regulation 1013 of the Revised Regulations of Ontario, 1990 shall be deemed to be sufficient evidence of the gross sales of a restaurant if the copies are certified by the owner or the owner’s representative as to the accuracy of the records.

(6) This section applies only in respect of a restaurant located within a local municipality that has a population of at least 5,000.

(7) This section takes effect with respect to a restaurant in Northern Ontario on July 1, 1996. O. Reg. 103/94, s. 11.

HOTELS AND MOTELS

12. (1) The owner of a hotel or motel that has more than seventy-five units shall implement a source separation program for the wastes generated by the operation of the hotel or motel or shall ensure that such a program is implemented.

(2) This section applies only in respect of a hotel or motel located within a local municipality that has a population of at least 5,000.

(3) This section takes effect with respect to a hotel or motel in Northern Ontario on July 1, 1996. O. Reg. 103/94, s. 12.

HOSPITALS

13. (1) The operator of a public hospital classified as a class A, B or F hospital in Regulation 964 of the Revised Regulations of Ontario, 1990 shall implement a source separation program for the wastes generated by the operation of the hospital or shall ensure that such a program is implemented.

(2) This section applies only in respect of a public hospital located within a local municipality that has a population of at least 5,000.

(3) This section takes effect with respect to a public hospital in Northern Ontario on July 1, 1996. O.Reg. 103/94, s. 13.

EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS

14. (1) This section applies to the operator of an educational institution in respect of a location or campus of the institution if, at the location or campus, at any time during the

Page 5 of 10Environmental Protection Act - O. Reg. 103/94

14/01/2008http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/regs/english/elaws_regs_940103_e.htm

Admin
Highlight
Page 30: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

calendar year, more than 350 persons are enrolled.

(2) The operator shall implement a source separation program for the waste generated by the operation of the institution at the location or campus or shall ensure that such a program is implemented.

(3) This section continues to apply in respect of a location or campus for the two calendar years following the last year in which more than 350 persons were enrolled at the location or campus.

(4) This section applies only in respect of a location or campus located within a local municipality that has a population of at least 5,000.

(5) This section takes effect with respect to a location or campus in Northern Ontario on July 1, 1996. O. Reg. 103/94, s. 14.

LARGE MANUFACTURING ESTABLISHMENTS

15. (1) This section applies to the owner or operator of a site that is a manufacturing establishment.

(2) The owner shall implement a source separation program for the waste generated by the operation of the establishment at the site or shall ensure that such a program is implemented.

(3) This section does not apply to an owner of a site in a particular calendar year if,

(a) during the two preceding calendar years there was no calendar month in which the hours worked by the persons employed at the site exceeded 16,000 hours; and

(b) the owner is able to demonstrate this fact, within seven days of a request from the Director, through evidence satisfactory to the Director.

(4) Copies of the records related to hours of employment maintained under section 11 of the Employment Standards Act shall be deemed to be sufficient evidence of hours worked at a site if the copies are certified by the owner or the owner’s representative as to the accuracy of the records.

(5) In this section,

“owner” includes the operator of a manufacturing establishment but does not include a landlord;

“site” means one property and includes nearby properties owned or leased by the same person where passage from one property to another involves crossing, but not travelling along, a public highway. O. Reg. 103/94, s. 15.

TRANSITION

16. Except as otherwise provided, a person who, upon the coming into force of this Regulation, or at any time within twelve months after the coming into force of this Regulation, becomes subject to an obligation with respect to the implementation of a source separation program shall fulfil the obligation within twelve months after the coming into force of this Regulation. O.Reg. 103/94, s. 16.

SCHEDULE

WASTES TO BE PROVIDED FOR IN SOURCE SEPARATION PROGRAMS

Page 6 of 10Environmental Protection Act - O. Reg. 103/94

14/01/2008http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/regs/english/elaws_regs_940103_e.htm

Page 31: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

2. Cardboard (corrugated).

3. Fine paper.

4. Glass bottles and jars for food or beverages.

5. Newsprint.

6. Polyethylene terephthalate bottles for food or beverages (including bottles made primarily of polyethylene terephthalate).

7. Steel food or beverage cans (including cans made primarily of steel).

PART IX

HOSPITALS

(referred to in section 13)

1. Aluminum food or beverage cans (including cans made primarily of aluminum).

2. Cardboard (corrugated).

3. Fine paper.

4. Glass bottles and jars for food or beverages.

5. Newsprint.

6. Steel food or beverage cans (including cans made primarily of steel).

PART X

EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS

(referred to in section 14)

1. Aluminum food or beverage cans (including cans made primarily of aluminum).

2. Cardboard (corrugated).

3. Fine paper.

4. Glass bottles and jars for food or beverages.

5. Newsprint.

6. Steel food or beverage cans (including cans made primarily of steel).

PART XI

LARGE MANUFACTURING ESTABLISHMENTS

(referred to in section 15)

1. Aluminum.

2. Cardboard (corrugated).

3. Fine paper.

4. Glass.

5. Newsprint.

Page 9 of 10Environmental Protection Act - O. Reg. 103/94

14/01/2008http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/regs/english/elaws_regs_940103_e.htm

Admin
Highlight
Page 32: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.
Page 33: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

Trent U Waste AuditProgressive Waste Solutions - Pick-up Summary

WASTE SUMMARYBuilding Bin Size Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total

Yd3 kg kg kg kg kg kg kg kg kg kg kg kg kgBlackburn Hall 4 430 610 370 560 800 500 450 520 480 570 440 350 6080Trent Day Care Centre 4 800 790 870 830 840 880 1100 500 680 680 610 560 9140Athletics Complex 4 790 1130 1500 1550 690 1130 1250 1020 1150 950 1090 360 12610Lady Eaton Residence 6 1890 2590 2630 3480 1480 660 790 720 2460 2270 2410 1713 23093Lady Eaton Kitchen -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0Champlain College Depot 2x8 4620 5720 7270 7810 3090 2850 2820 1600 7370 6740 7620 5460 62970Gzowski Building Depot 2x6 1670 1870 1990 3110 1610 780 780 840 1890 1230 1320 890 17980Gzowski Kitchen 6 2270 2700 3420 3740 1210 1040 1040 840 2350 2470 2680 2010 25770Otonabee College Residence - South End 8 1660 1640 2210 3090 980 130 130 0 1580 1460 1470 1390 15740Otonabee College Residence - North End 8 961 1470 1810 2040 440 400 390 220 1090 1270 1520 1130 12741DNA Lab 6 1410 1610 1570 2080 1500 1550 1630 1060 1340 1480 1610 1370 18210Animal Care Facility 2 240 180 220 320 260 120 180 190 270 350 220 240 2790Otonabee College Kitchen 8 3030 2840 3270 2770 740 830 780 590 3160 2590 3310 1540 25450Otonabee College Admin Depot 6 1720 2650 2440 2160 1150 1560 1630 1380 2550 2080 2130 1240 22690Otonabee College Admin Depot 4 1200 1340 840 580 360 130 130 190 950 420 960 240 7340Science Lab 2 350 370 630 500 400 550 440 280 570 590 1020 470 6170Catherine Parr Traill College 2 570 660 810 980 440 240 300 390 780 670 520 550 6910Grounds Crew -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0MNR Building 4 120 220 210 400 210 200 160 530 170 160 150 200 2730Blackburn Hall (@ Carpentry) Temp 20 486 -- 424 338 338 480 280 376 154 448 -- 364 3688Champlain College Depot - Move Out Temp 20 1518 1518Lady Eaton Residence - Move In/Out Temp 20 1427 330 1757Gzowski Building Depot - Move In/Out Temp 20 165 165Otonabee College Res.- N End - Move Out Temp 20 949 949Orange Lodge Temp 20 374 288 662780 Argyle St Temp 20 68 68TOTAL kg 24217 28390 32484 40232 16538 14030 14280 11246 29931 26716 29080 20077 287221

MT 24.22 28.39 32.48 40.23 16.54 14.03 14.28 11.25 29.93 26.72 29.08 20.08 287.22

CARDBOARD SUMMARYBuilding Bin Size Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total

Yd3 Lifts Lifts Lifts Lifts Lifts Lifts Lifts Lifts Lifts Lifts Lifts Lifts Lifts Yd3 kgBlackburn Hall 2 4 5 3 5 5 4 4 5 4 5 5 3 52 104 4732Trent Day Care Centre 0.47 4 4 5 4 4 5 4 5 4 4 5 3 51 24 1090.6Athletics Complex 2 4 4 5 4 4 5 4 5 4 4 5 3 51 102 4641Lady Eaton Residence 4 8 8 9 9 8 9 9 9 9 8 9 7 102 408 18564Champlain College Depot 2x8 24 26 24 26 26 26 26 28 26 26 26 20 304 4864 221312Gzowski Building Depot 8 12 13 12 13 13 13 13 14 13 13 13 10 152 1216 55328Gzowski Kitchen 6 12 13 12 13 13 13 13 14 13 13 13 10 152 912 41496Otonabee College Residence - South End 4 8 8 9 9 8 9 9 9 9 8 9 7 102 408 18564Otonabee College Residence - North End 4 8 8 9 9 8 9 9 9 9 8 9 7 102 408 18564DNA Lab 6 8 8 9 9 8 9 9 9 9 8 9 7 102 612 27846Otonabee College Kitchen 8 12 13 12 13 13 13 13 14 13 13 13 10 152 1216 55328Otonabee College Admin Depot 4 12 13 12 13 13 13 13 14 13 13 13 10 152 608 27664Champlain College Depot - Move In (kg) Temp 20 400 400.00Otonabee College Res - S End Move In (kg) Temp 20 500 500.00Otonabee College Res - N End Move In (kg) Temp 20 100 100.00Additional OCC from Garbage Sorting 826.00 1,873 1,152 3,851TOTAL kg 499981

MT 499.98

Mixed PapersBuilding Totes Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total

95 Gal. Lifts Lifts Lifts Lifts Lifts Lifts Lifts Lifts Lifts Lifts Lifts Lifts Lifts kgBlackburn Hall 5, 3 45 24 27 27 24 27 27 27 27 24 27 21 327 27795Trent Day Care Centre -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0 0Athletics Complex 1 9 8 9 9 8.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 8.00 9.00 7.00 103 8755Lady Eaton Residence 2,3 18 24 27 27 24 27 27 27 27 24 27 21 300 25500Lady Eaton Kitchen 1 -- 8 9 8 8 9 9 9 9 8 9 7 93 7905Champlain College Depot 6,4 54 32 36 36 32 36 36 36 36 32 36 28 430 36550Gzowski Building Depot 4,6 36 48 54 54 48 54 54 54 54 48 54 42 600 51000Gzowski Kitchen -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0 0Otonabee College Residence - South End 4,2 36 16 18 18 16 18 18 18 18 16 18 14 224 19040Otonabee College Residence - North End 1,2 9 16 18 18 16 18 18 18 18 16 18 14 197 16745DNA Lab 3,4 27 32 36 36 32 36 36 36 36 32 36 28 403 34255Animal Care Facility -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0 0Otonabee College Kitchen 2 18 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 18 1530Otonabee College Admin Depot 2,4 18 32 36 36 32 36 36 36 36 32 36 28 394 33490Science Lab -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0 0Catherine Parr Traill College 2,3 8 12 15 12 15 12 12 15 12 12 15 9 149 12665MNR Building 1 -- 4 4 5 4 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 47 3995Orange Lodge (in kg) Temp 20 1360 1360TOTAL kg 280585

MT 280.59

Comingled ContainersBuilding Totes Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total

95 Gal. Lifts Lifts Lifts Lifts Lifts Lifts Lifts Lifts Lifts Lifts Lifts Lifts Lifts kgBlackburn Hall 5 45 40 45 45 40 45 45 45 45 40 45 35 515 22145Trent Day Care Centre 6 44 40 46 44 40 46 44 46 44 40 46 34 514 22102Athletics Complex 4,3 36 24 27 27 24 27 27 27 27 24 27 21 318 13674Lady Eaton Residence 6,4 54 32 36 36 32 36 36 36 36 32 36 28 430 18490Lady Eaton Kitchen 5,4 45 32 36 32 32 36 36 36 36 32 36 28 417 17931Champlain College Depot 6,8 54 64 72 72 64 72 72 72 72 64 72 56 806 34658Gzowski Building Depot 11,5 99 40 45 45 40 45 45 45 45 40 45 35 569 24467Gzowski Kitchen 8 -- 72 72 72 64 72 72 72 72 96 104 80 848 36464Otonabee College Residence - South End 11,5 99 40 45 45 40 45 45 45 45 40 45 35 569 24467Otonabee College Residence - North End 6 54 48 54 54 48 54 54 54 54 48 54 42 618 26574DNA Lab 6 54 48 54 54 48 54 54 54 54 48 54 42 618 26574Animal Care Facility -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0 0Otonabee College Kitchen 13 117 104 117 117 104 117 117 117 117 104 117 91 1339 57577Otonabee College Admin Depot 6 54 48 54 54 48 54 54 54 54 48 54 42 618 26574Science Lab -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0 0Catherine Parr Traill College 4,5 16 20 25 20 25 20 20 25 20 20 25 15 251 10793MNR Building 4,1 20 4 4 5 4 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 67 2881TOTAL kg 365371

MT 365.37

SCRAP METALS SUMMARYBuilding Bin Size Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total

Yd3 kg kg kg kg kg kg kg kg kg kg kg kg kgAthletics Complex Temp 20 1,340 1340Grounds Crew Temp 20 1820 1680 1960 2170 1210 2650 2640 14130TOTAL kg 1,820 0 0 1,680 1,340 1,960 0 2,170 1,210 0 2,650 2,640 15,470

MT 1.82 0 0 1.68 1.34 1.96 0 2.17 1.21 0 2.65 2.64 15.47

SCRAP WOODS SUMMARYBuilding Bin Size Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total

Yd3 kg kg kg kg kg kg kg kg kg kg kg kg kgBlackburn Hall (@ Carpentry) Temp 20 1944 -- 1696 1352 1352 1920 1120 1504 616 1792 -- 1456 14752Grounds Crew Temp 30 1780 1780TOTAL kg 0 0 0 1,780 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16,532

MT 0 0 0 1.78 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.532

Page 34: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

Invoice to Customer C013261 - CHARTWELLS /CHAMPLAIN COLLEGE

ATT: JODY KRISP 1600 WES BANK DR Peterborough, ON K9L 1Z8

Month JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

Volume KG

2015 1,150 1,000

2016 1,800 1,650 1,700

Var 100% - -100% 100% - -100% - - - - - 100%

Used Cooking Oil

Value CAD

2015 24 35

2016 27 115 51

Var 100% - -100% 100% - -100% - - - - - 100%

# Services

2015 1

2016 1 1 1

Var 100% - - 100% - -100% - - - - - 100%

2016

TOTAL VOLUME

5,150 KG

TOTAL VALUE

193 CAD

TOTAL # SERVICES

3

2015

TOTAL VOLUME

2,150 KG

TOTAL VALUE

60 CAD

TOTAL # SERVICES

1

page 1 of 1

Period Based on Regular Calendar

Business Review - Invoice To

Page 35: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.
SDK
Rectangle
SDK
Line
SDK
Text Box
Assumed same value for 2016
Page 36: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.
Page 37: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.
Page 38: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.
Page 39: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.
Page 40: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

Swap shop weights

Email date Item  Number  Weight per unit  (kg) Total weight 

3M adjustable keyboard tray 1 6 6

Adding machine paper rolls (2 ¼”) 10 ? ?

adjustable monitor stand 3 1.1 3.3

Articulating keyboard tray 1 6 6

articulating keyboard trays 3 6 18

Attendance board 1 4 4

Binders 30 0.45 13.5

Binders 8 0.45 3.6

25‐Jan Binders  5 0.45 2.25

Binders  8 0.45 3.6

Binders  15 0.45 6.75

Blackboard (3x3ft) 1 3 3

Blackout buddy power failure plug 1 0.19 0.19

Bookcase (20"x30"x66") 1 53 53

Bookshelf 1 53 53

Bookshelf  1 53 53

bookshelf (4 shelf wood)  1 53 53

Box of 500 10x13" envelopes 1 1.3 1.3

Business Card Holder 1 0.04 0.04

Canon Black 6 cartridge  6 0.008 0.048

Canon Calculators (MP 49D) 2 1.77 3.54

Canon FX‐4 cartridges 2 1.36 2.72

Chair 1 7 7

Chair 1 7 7

Chair  1 7 7

Chair backrest  1 0.63 0.63

Computer desk (47x18") 1 82 82

computer mice 2 0.22 0.44

Computer monitor stand  1 1.09 1.09

Computer mouse 1 0.22 0.22

Computer mouse 1 0.22 0.22

Computer speakers  1 0.612 0.612

Cork Bulletin board  1 3.03 3.03

Cork bulliten board (36 x 48”) 1 3.03 3.03

corner desk (34"x 45") 1 61 61

Corner desk w hutch  1 61 61

Dell 18’ black computer monitor  1 3 3

Desk (4ft)  1 61 61

Desk (60x24") 1 84 84

Desk (6x3ft) 1 86 86

Desk drawer organizer  1 0.45 0.45

Desk hutch (76") 1 37.64 37.64

Desk hutches 3 37.64 112.92

Desk lamp 1 1.22 1.22

Desk top file organizers  12 3.17 38.04

Desk  (5'x2'x2'5") 1 84 84

Desk (8' 8"x2'6"x30")  1 156 156

Desks 3 97 291

Desktop scanner  1 12 12

Desktop sign holders 2 0.36 0.72

Document Holder 1 0.36 0.36

16‐Feb Document stand  1 0.36 0.36

DVD cases  36 0.05 1.8

Exponent power bar with 3‐foot cord 1 0.49 0.49

Fabric covered chairs  3 10.43 31.29

Fabric covered chairs  2 10.43 20.86

Fabric covered chairs (22.5” wide) 2 10.43 20.86

Fax machine 1 6.75 6.75

file folders (8.5x14)  5 0.45 2.25

File Holders  6 0.45 2.7

file tray 1 1.3 1.3

File trays  22 1.3 28.6

filing cabinet (2 drawer) 1 27 27

filing cabinet (3 drawer) 1 49 49

filing cabinet (4 drawers) 2 49 98

Filing Cabinets (4 drawer) 2 49 98

Floor lamp 1 3.2 3.2

Floor protector mat (5x3.9ft) 1 4.5 4.5

Four drawer file cabinet  1 49 49

16‐Mar Four drawer filing cabinet (52”x15”x27”) 1 49 49

Grand and Toy #CE505A toner cartridge  1 1.1 1.1

Grand and Toy HP Q2612A Cartridge  1 0.612 0.612

Green card organizer boxes 2 0.45 0.9

Hanging file folders, file folders 5 0.001 0.005

Hanging file folders, file folders  100 0.001 0.1

Heat sealer  1 5.89 5.89

Heated footrest 1 2.26 2.26

Heavy duty 3 hole punch  1 1.9 1.9

HP 128 A Black toner 1 0.08 0.08

HP 26 Black 1 0.08 0.08

HP 38A Black Toner  1 0.08 0.08

HP 4200 Paper trays 2 2.54 5.08

HP 42X print cartridges 2 3.17 6.34

HP 42X print cartridges 2 3.17 6.34

HP 64x printer cartridge  1 3.17 3.17

HP C7115X Cartridge 1 1.08 1.08

HP keyboard, wired 1 0.44 0.44

HP Keyboards 3 0.44 1.32

HP Laserjet 3600 print cartridge, Magenta, 502A 1 1.49 1.49

HP Laserjet 53A Cartridges  2 1.49 2.98

HP laserjet 645 cartridges  4 1.49 5.96

HP LaserJet C3903A Cartridge 1 1.49 1.49

HP LaserJet Print Cartridge 4000.4050 (C4127X) 1 1.49 1.49

HP LaserJet Pro 400 Black and White printer  1 8.57 8.57

HP OfficeJet Pro K8600 A3+ Inkjet Printer 1 13 13

HP Q5942X Cartridge 2 3.17 6.34

HP Scan jet 7000 1 5.35 5.35

HP Scanjet 7000   1 5.35 5.35

Inkjet printer 1 6.53 6.53

Kensington foot rest 1 2.9 2.9

keyboard 1 1 1

keyboard 1 1 1

Keyboard 1 1 1

Keyboard tray  1 1 1

Keyboard trays  3 1 3

Kodak slide tray  1 0.72 0.72

laminating machines 2 1.45 2.9

Lamps 2 1.22 2.44

laptop bag  2 0.45 0.9

Laptop case  2 0.45 0.9

Large corner desk  1 156 156

Large Culligan water cooler  1 11.33 11.33

Large white board  2 8.34 16.68

Laser Printer Toner Cartridge PANAFAX UF‐790 1 1.49 1.49

Laser Toner Cartridge for HP LaserJet 1010 (12A) 1 1.49 1.49

Page 41: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

Laser Toner Cartridge for HP Q2612A 1 1.49 1.49

Legal hanging file folders  10 0.45 4.5

16‐Apr Lexmark toner cartridge X264 H11G 1 1.49 1.49

Lexmark Toner Cartridge X264H11G 1 1.49 1.49

Lidded boxes for business cards  1 0.45 0.45

Logitech bluetooth keyboard 1 1 1

Logitech keyboard 1 1 1

magazine holder 1 0.2 0.2

Magazine rack  1 11.33 11.33

Manual Stamps  10 0.045 0.45

Metal 2 sided Desk 1 102 102

Metal bookends 1 1.08 1.08

Metal desk (60x30") 1 84 84

metal file organizer 2 3.4 6.8

Metal file organizer  1 3.4 3.4

metal file organizers 2 3.4 6.8

Metal filing cabinet (15x29.5") 1 27 27

Metal shelf (3x2ft) 1 5.3 5.3

Metal shelf (6x2ft) 1 6 6

Mini fridge 1 18.14 18.14

Mobile file cabinet  1 11.61 11.61

Mobile workstations 4 4.98 19.92

monitor stand  4 2.22 8.88

Monitor stand with side trays 1 2.22 2.22

Monitor stands  2 2.22 4.44

Oak tables (39 x 60") 40 63 2520

office chair 1 19 19

Office chair 1 19 19

Office chair 1 19 19

Office chair 1 19 19

Office chair  1 19 19

Office chairs 3 19 57

Office chairs  3 19 57

Office chairs  3 19 57

Office desk  1 50 50

Panasonic DMR‐E50 1 4.53 4.53

Panasonic DVD‐S35 2 4.53 9.06

Panasonic PT‐F100 1 6.2 6.2

Panasonic PT‐F300 1 6.2 6.2

Panasonic PT‐FW300 4 6.2 24.8

Panasonic PT‐FX400 1 6.2 6.2

Panasonic PV‐D4644S‐K 1 2.22 2.22

Panasonic PV‐D4745S‐K 1 2.22 2.22

Paper cutter (11x17) 1 21.9 21.9

Paper organizers 4 1.08 4.32

Paper Shredder 1 3.74 3.74

Phillips 170 S Computer monitor 1 3.9 3.9

Phone  1 1.36 1.36

Phone cord  1 0.45 0.45

Plastic chairs 12 7 84

Plastic Chairs 10 7 70

Plastic chairs  3 7 21

Plastic desk organizer insert  1 0.22 0.22

Plastic file holders  3 1.08 3.24

Plastic file tote bins  7 1.22 8.54

plastic file tray 1 0.45 0.45

plastic footrest 1 2.26 2.26

plastic stacking trays 5 0.45 2.25

plastic stacking trays 3 0.45 1.35

Podium  1 19.5 19.5

Presentation board 1 9.07 9.07

Printer  1 2.73 2.73

Printer table (1 ft)  1 2.26 2.26

Printing calculator 1 2.26 2.26

printing calculator (Canon ph‐d1)  1 2.26 2.26

Push lights  8 0.22 1.76

Rattan chair  1 10.43 10.43

Rattan loveseat 1 12 12

Rattan side table  1 6.8 6.8

Round table 1 11 11

Rounded table  1 11 11

Rubbermaid cooler  1 2.2 2.2

Samsung M409 ‐ CLP‐310/315 Series toner cartridge  1 1.49 1.49

Samsung SV‐7000W 1 4.79 4.79

Shelf unit (42”x15.5”x36”) 1 5 5

Shoe rack/shelf 1 4.4 4.4

Slide projector  1 0.133 0.133

Slim line space heater  1 1.4 1.4

Small Bookcase 1 41 41

Small bookshelf  1 41 41

Small desk 1 27.21 27.21

Small desk lamp  1 1.22 1.22

Small home depot moving boxes (16”x12”x12” ) 4 0.8 3.2

Small recording machine  1 0.2 0.2

Small water cooler  1 3.1 3.1

Stand up coat rack 1 2.4 2.4

Stand up coat rack 1 2.4 2.4

Stand up pamphlet boxes  10 0.272 2.72

Standing coat rack  1 2.4 2.4

Storage cabinet  1 13.6 13.6

Table (55") 1 56 56

Table (78"x24”x29”) 1 136 136

Table (8x3ft) 1 136 136

tables (24x36) 2 66 132

16‐Jan tables (30x36)  7 73 511

tables (30x48) 12 80 960

Toshiba SDV398KC2 1 2.7 2.7

Upright cabinets 3 18.14 54.42

vertical cardboard magazine holders  4 0.272 1.088

VFI Carts w equipment racks  5 18.14 90.7

Vinyl chair mat (3x4ft)‐ carpeted  1 4.5 4.5

Vinyl chair mats (3x4ft)‐ non carpeted  3 4.5 13.5

Wall clock 1 1.36 1.36

Wall mounted cabinets (30x35")  2 18.14 36.28

Wall mounted file folders 6 2.26 13.56

White board (36”x48”)  1 8.34 8.34

Wired mice  2 0.1 0.2

wood Bookshelf (6x2x3) 1 27.2 27.2

16‐May Wood desk (57x49) 1 156 156

Wood table 1 156 156

Wood Table 1 156 156

Wood tables  2 156 312

Wooden tables 2 156 312

Wooden work station  2 295 590

Total (kg) 9862.678

Page 42: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

Waste Audit ReportTrent University - Durham CampusWRG Project P0703

Waste Management and Recycling Service Summary

MaterialsProgram

Implemened Yes/No

Service ProviderCampus Contact

NameContact Number

Number Equipment Size Number of Bins Pick-Up Frequency Annual Quantity

Waste/Garbage Yes Miller Waste Dave Kirkpatrick 416-771-3089 Bins 6 yd 1 As needed 6700kg

Cardboard Yes Miller Waste Dave Kirkpatrick 416-771-3089 Bins 6 yd 1 As needed 7646kg

Mixed Containers (i.e. Bottles & Cans) Yes Miller Waste Dave Kirkpatrick 416-771-3089 Totes 95 Gallon 4 As needed 700kg

Mixed papers (office, news, etc) Yes Miller Waste Dave Kirkpatrick 416-771-3089 Bins 6 yd 1 As needed With Cardboard

Confidential papers/Shredding Yes Iron Mountain Amber Ashton 905-435-5102x5005 Totes 65 Gallon 1 As needed (6x yr) 390 Gallons

Organics No

Scrap Metals No

Scrap Woods No

Electronic Wastes No

Fluorescent Bulbs & Ballasts Yes Lowes Dave Kirkpatrick 416-771-3089 As needed

Batteries Yes Lowes Dave Kirkpatrick 416-771-3089 As needed

Printer Toner Cartridges yes Laser Toner Specialists Amber Ashton 905-435-5102x5005 Printer Cartridges Various 10 pieces As needed 10 pieces

Paper Towels No

Coffee cups No

#2 HDPE Plastics (i.e. large pails) No

#4 LDPE Plastic Films No

#6 Polystyrene/Styrofoam No

Other/Mixed Plastics No

Wood skids/pallets (Reuse) No

Used furniture/equipment (Reuse) No

Other: LCBO/Beer Store Returns No

Other: Oil & Grease Yes Rex Services Dave Kirkpatrick 416-771-3089 50 Gallon Trap As needed 50 Gallons

Other: Yard Wastes Yes Reused on Site Dave Kirkpatrick 416-771-3089

Other: Reduction - Water Bottle Filling Stations Yes

Other: Reduction - Double sided printing Yes Reused on Site

Other: Reduction - Refillable coffee mug program Yes 20 cent savings

Other: Lab Glass Recycling No

SDK
Text Box
Durham Campus
Page 43: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

Appendix B

Waste Audit Data

Page 44: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

Waste Audit Report

Trent University

Waste Reduction Group Project P0703

Table B1: Garbage Sample Summary - By Building

Sample # Campus Location Waste Audit Date 24‐hr Sample

kg %

1 Peterborough Champlain Jan. 18 & 20, 2017 57.00 15.5%

2 Peterborough Gzowski Jan. 19, 2017 49.06 13.4%

3 Peterborough Environmental Science Jan. 19, 2017 57.93 15.8%

4 Peterborough Blackburn Jan. 19, 2017 11.88 3.2%

5 Peterborough DNA Jan. 19, 2017 48.92 13.3%

6 Peterborough Otonabee College Jan. 20, 2017 70.88 19.3%

7 Peterborough Lady Eaton College Jan. 20, 2017 34.90 9.5%

8 Durham Durham Campus Jan. 27, 2017 36.61 10.0%

Total 367.18 100.0%

Table B2: Overall Garbage Sample Summary - By Functional Area

Waste Generating Area

Sample Size

Percent of Sample Size

kg % kg % kg % kg % kg % kg % kg % kg %

Mixed Containers PET (#1) 1.02 2.4% 3.97 4.6% 3.77 4.8% 1.55 2.4% 0.06 0.9% 1.27 2.9% 0.15 0.4% 11.80 3.2%

HDPE (#2) 0.07 0.2% 0.01 0.0% 0.20 0.3% 0.90 1.4% 0.00 0.0% 0.05 0.1% 0.09 0.2% 1.32 0.4%

PP (#5) 0.34 0.8% 1.13 1.3% 1.09 1.4% 0.37 0.6% 0.00 0.0% 0.70 1.6% 0.00 0.0% 3.63 1.0%

PS (#6) 0.69 1.7% 1.89 2.2% 2.73 3.5% 0.61 0.9% 0.06 0.8% 0.74 1.7% 0.12 0.3% 6.84 1.9%

Glass 0.45 1.1% 1.15 1.3% 1.08 1.4% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.16 0.4% 0.00 0.0% 2.84 0.8%

Aluminum 0.63 1.5% 0.55 0.6% 0.39 0.5% 0.17 0.3% 0.19 2.5% 0.03 0.1% 0.09 0.2% 2.06 0.6%

Steel 0.08 0.2% 0.40 0.5% 0.00 0.0% 0.02 0.0% 0.17 2.2% 0.00 0.0% 0.16 0.4% 0.83 0.2%

Gable Top 0.36 0.9% 0.88 1.0% 0.82 1.0% 0.31 0.5% 0.04 0.5% 0.63 1.4% 0.03 0.1% 3.07 0.8%

Aseptic 0.18 0.4% 0.51 0.6% 0.18 0.2% 0.06 0.1% 0.02 0.2% 0.26 0.6% 0.12 0.3% 1.34 0.4%

Mixed Papers Fine Paper 4.93 11.8% 1.32 1.5% 1.33 1.7% 0.72 1.1% 0.01 0.1% 0.37 0.8% 1.98 4.6% 10.66 2.9%

Newspaper 0.15 0.4% 1.02 1.2% 0.97 1.2% 0.01 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 2.15 0.6%

Boxboard 1.46 3.5% 3.14 3.6% 1.92 2.4% 1.29 2.0% 0.00 0.0% 1.06 2.4% 1.06 2.5% 9.92 2.7%

Other Fibres 1.36 3.3% 4.02 4.6% 3.67 4.7% 1.99 3.0% 0.14 1.8% 1.07 2.4% 0.16 0.4% 12.40 3.4%

Cardboard 0.58 1.4% 0.46 0.5% 0.02 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.15 1.9% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 1.21 0.3%

Paper Towels 3.32 8.0% 10.11 11.6% 4.17 5.3% 37.77 57.6% 0.57 7.5% 3.46 7.8% 6.61 15.5% 66.00 18.0%

Coffee Cups 2.64 6.3% 2.86 3.3% 9.51 12.1% 1.31 2.0% 0.06 0.8% 1.65 3.7% 1.45 3.4% 19.48 5.3%

Organics 7.80 18.7% 28.32 32.6% 18.81 24.0% 6.04 9.2% 3.85 50.7% 24.91 56.4% 6.15 14.4% 95.89 26.1%

Coffee Pods 0.00 0.0% 0.23 0.3% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.16 0.4% 0.39 0.1%

LDPE Plastic Films 4.14 9.9% 5.01 5.8% 5.26 6.7% 2.39 3.6% 0.43 5.7% 0.58 1.3% 4.82 11.3% 22.63 6.2%

Styrofoam 0.15 0.4% 0.15 0.2% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.30 0.1%

Plastic Strapping 0.17 0.4% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.02 0.0% 0.16 0.4% 0.35 0.1%

Lab Plastics 0.26 0.6% 0.00 0.0% 0.26 0.3% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 3.84 9.0% 4.36 1.2%

Lab Glass 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 8.17 19.1% 8.17 2.2%

Scrap Metal  0.26 0.6% 0.00 0.0% 0.03 0.0% 0.02 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.31 0.1%

Scrap Wood 0.12 0.3% 0.04 0.0% 0.07 0.1% 0.25 0.4% 0.00 0.0% 0.35 0.8% 0.00 0.0% 0.83 0.2%

Electronic Waste 0.56 1.3% 1.44 1.7% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 2.00 0.5%

Bulbs 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Batteries 0.12 0.3% 0.04 0.0% 0.02 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.18 0.0%

Printer Toners 0.19 0.5% 0.42 0.5% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.61 0.2%

Other/Nonrecyclable 9.69 23.2% 17.89 20.6% 22.07 28.2% 9.83 15.0% 1.84 24.3% 6.89 15.6% 7.38 17.3% 75.60 20.6%

QAQC Check 41.74 100.0% 86.95 100.0% 78.38 100.0% 65.61 100.0% 7.60 100.0% 44.20 100.0% 42.70 100.0% 367.18 100.0%

Mixed Containers 3.83 9.2% 10.49 12.1% 10.26 13.1% 4.00 6.1% 0.54 7.1% 3.85 8.7% 0.76 1.8% 33.73 9.2%

Mixed Papers 7.90 18.9% 9.49 10.9% 7.89 10.1% 4.01 6.1% 0.15 2.0% 2.50 5.7% 3.20 7.5% 35.13 9.6%

Mandatory Recyclables (Reg103) 6.8 16.3% 4.9 5.6% 3.8 4.8% 0.9 1.4% 0.5 6.8% 0.6 1.3% 2.2 5.2% 19.7 5.4%

Other Recyclables 25.23 60.4% 64.16 73.8% 52.51 67.0% 54.86 83.6% 5.24 69.0% 36.75 83.1% 33.09 77.5% 271.84 74.0%

Non‐Recyclable 9.7 23.2% 17.9 20.6% 22.1 28.2% 9.8 15.0% 1.8 24.3% 6.9 15.6% 7.4 17.3% 75.6 20.6%

QAQC Check TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0%

Table B3: Overall Garbage Composition (Ranked)

Waste Composition % Annual Divert? Est.

293.92 MT Y/N Amount1

Organics 26.1% 76.76 MT Yes 46.05

Other/Nonrecyclable 20.6% 60.52 MT No

Paper Towels 18.0% 52.83 MT Yes 31.70

Mixed Papers 9.6% 28.12 MT Yes 16.87

Mixed Containers 9.2% 27.00 MT Yes 16.20

LDPE Plastic Films 6.2% 18.11 MT Yes 10.87

Coffee Cups 5.3% 15.60 MT Yes 9.36

Lab Glass 2.2% 6.54 MT Yes 3.92

Lab Plastics 1.2% 3.49 MT Yes 2.09

Electronic Waste 0.5% 1.60 MT Yes 0.96

Cardboard 0.3% 0.97 MT Yes 0.58

Scrap Wood 0.2% 0.66 MT Yes 0.40

Printer Toners 0.2% 0.49 MT Yes 0.29

Coffee Pods 0.1% 0.31 MT Yes 0.19

Plastic Strapping 0.1% 0.28 MT Yes 0.17

Scrap Metal 0.1% 0.25 MT Yes 0.15

Styrofoam 0.1% 0.24 MT Yes 0.14

Batteries 0.05% 0.15 MT Yes 0.09

QAQC Check 100.0% 293.92 MT 140.041.  Assumed 60% capture rate of materials in garbage stream.

Table B4: Overall Mixed Container Summary Table B5: Overall Mixed Paper Summary

Material kg % Disposed Recycled Material kg % Disposed Recycled

MT MT MT MT

27.00 366.07 28.12 284.41

PET (#1) 11.80 35.0% 9.44 128.04 Fine 10.66 30.4% 8.54 86.34

HDPE (#2) 1.32 3.9% 1.06 14.38 Newsprint 2.15 6.1% 1.72 17.37

PP (#5) 3.63 10.8% 2.91 39.43 BoxBoard 9.92 28.2% 7.94 80.32

PS (#6) 6.84 20.3% 5.48 74.27 Other 12.40 35.3% 9.93 100.38

Glass 2.84 8.4% 2.27 30.82 Total 35.13 100.0% 28.12 284.41

Aluminum 2.06 6.1% 1.65 22.32

Steel 0.83 2.4% 0.66 8.96

Gable Top 3.07 9.1% 2.46 33.29

Aseptic 1.34 4.0% 1.07 14.56

Total 33.73 100.0% 27.00 366.07

367.18

Complex Labs

11.4% 23.7% 21.3% 11.6%2.1% 12.0%

41.74 86.95 78.38

Office Areas Public Areas Classrooms

44.20

17.9%

42.70

Total

100.0%

Washrooms Food Services Dining Areas

65.61 7.60

Page 45: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

Waste Audit Report

Trent University

Waste Reduction Group Project P0703

Table B6: Peterborough Campus Garbage Sample Summary - By Functional Area

Waste Generating Area

Sample Size

Percent of Sample Size

kg % kg % kg % kg % kg % kg % kg % kg %

Mixed Containers PET (#1) 0.98 2.5% 3.64 4.6% 3.31 5.1% 1.55 2.5% 0.00 0.0% 1.16 3.1% 0.15 0.4% 10.79 3.3%

HDPE (#2) 0.07 0.2% 0.01 0.0% 0.04 0.1% 0.90 1.5% 0.00 0.0% 0.05 0.1% 0.09 0.2% 1.16 0.4%

PP (#5) 0.34 0.9% 1.13 1.4% 0.99 1.5% 0.37 0.6% 0.00 0.0% 0.59 1.6% 0.00 0.0% 3.42 1.0%

PS (#6) 0.61 1.6% 1.68 2.1% 2.33 3.6% 0.56 0.9% 0.00 0.0% 0.59 1.6% 0.12 0.3% 5.89 1.8%

Glass 0.45 1.2% 1.15 1.4% 1.08 1.7% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.16 0.4% 0.00 0.0% 2.84 0.9%

Aluminum 0.63 1.6% 0.53 0.7% 0.36 0.6% 0.12 0.2% 0.12 2.7% 0.00 0.0% 0.09 0.2% 1.85 0.6%

Steel 0.08 0.2% 0.40 0.5% 0.00 0.0% 0.02 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.16 0.4% 0.66 0.2%

Gable Top 0.36 0.9% 0.88 1.1% 0.82 1.3% 0.31 0.5% 0.00 0.0% 0.30 0.8% 0.03 0.1% 2.70 0.8%

Aseptic 0.13 0.3% 0.47 0.6% 0.18 0.3% 0.01 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.03 0.1% 0.12 0.3% 0.94 0.3%

Mixed Papers Fine Paper 4.78 12.3% 1.03 1.3% 1.17 1.8% 0.71 1.1% 0.01 0.2% 0.18 0.5% 1.98 4.6% 9.86 3.0%

Newspaper 0.15 0.4% 0.14 0.2% 0.11 0.2% 0.01 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.41 0.1%

Boxboard 1.46 3.8% 3.06 3.8% 1.26 1.9% 1.25 2.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.74 2.0% 1.06 2.5% 8.83 2.7%

Other Fibres 1.36 3.5% 3.73 4.7% 2.65 4.1% 1.78 2.9% 0.07 1.6% 0.64 1.7% 0.16 0.4% 10.39 3.1%

Cardboard 0.58 1.5% 0.44 0.6% 0.02 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 1.04 0.3%

Paper Towels 2.79 7.2% 9.44 11.8% 3.28 5.0% 34.65 55.9% 0.45 10.3% 3.00 8.0% 6.61 15.5% 60.22 18.2%

Coffee Cups 2.25 5.8% 2.56 3.2% 7.67 11.7% 1.26 2.0% 0.00 0.0% 1.11 3.0% 1.45 3.4% 16.30 4.9%

Organics 6.94 17.9% 25.39 31.7% 14.76 22.6% 6.04 9.7% 1.81 41.3% 21.42 57.3% 6.15 14.4% 82.51 25.0%

Coffee Pods 0.00 0.0% 0.23 0.3% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.16 0.4% 0.39 0.1%

LDPE Plastic Films 3.77 9.7% 4.60 5.8% 4.14 6.3% 2.39 3.9% 0.28 6.4% 0.33 0.9% 4.82 11.3% 20.33 6.1%

Styrofoam 0.15 0.4% 0.15 0.2% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.30 0.1%

Plastic Strapping 0.16 0.4% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.02 0.1% 0.16 0.4% 0.34 0.1%

Lab Plastics 0.26 0.7% 0.00 0.0% 0.26 0.4% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 3.84 9.0% 4.36 1.3%

Lab Glass 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 8.17 19.1% 8.17 2.5%

Scrap Metal  0.05 0.1% 0.00 0.0% 0.03 0.0% 0.02 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.10 0.0%

Scrap Wood 0.12 0.3% 0.04 0.1% 0.07 0.1% 0.25 0.4% 0.00 0.0% 0.35 0.9% 0.00 0.0% 0.83 0.3%

Electronic Waste 0.56 1.4% 1.44 1.8% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 2.00 0.6%

Bulbs 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Batteries 0.06 0.2% 0.04 0.1% 0.02 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.12 0.0%

Printer Toners 0.19 0.5% 0.42 0.5% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.61 0.2%

Other/Nonrecyclable 9.50 24.5% 17.40 21.8% 20.82 31.8% 9.76 15.8% 1.64 37.4% 6.71 18.0% 7.38 17.3% 73.21 22.1%

QAQC Check 38.78 100.0% 80.00 100.0% 65.37 100.0% 61.96 100.0% 4.38 100.0% 37.38 100.0% 42.70 100.0% 330.57 100.0%

Mixed Containers 3.65 9.4% 9.89 12.4% 9.11 13.9% 3.84 6.2% 0.12 2.7% 2.88 7.7% 0.76 1.8% 30.25 9.2%

Mixed Papers 7.75 20.0% 7.96 10.0% 5.19 7.9% 3.75 6.1% 0.08 1.8% 1.56 4.2% 3.20 7.5% 29.49 8.9%

Mandatory Recyclables (Reg103) 6.7 17.2% 3.7 4.6% 2.7 4.2% 0.9 1.4% 0.1 3.0% 0.3 0.9% 2.2 5.2% 16.7 5.0%

Other Recyclables 22.61 58.3% 58.91 73.6% 41.81 64.0% 51.34 82.9% 2.61 59.6% 30.33 81.1% 33.09 77.5% 240.70 72.8%

Non‐Recyclable 9.5 24.5% 17.4 21.8% 20.8 31.8% 9.8 15.8% 1.6 37.4% 6.7 18.0% 7.4 17.3% 73.2 22.1%

QAQC Check TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0%

Table B7: Overall Garbage Sample Summary - By Functional Area

Waste Generating Area

Sample Size

Percent of Sample Size

kg % kg % kg % kg % kg % kg % kg % kg %

Mixed Containers PET (#1) 0.04 1.4% 0.33 4.7% 0.46 3.5% 0.00 0.0% 0.06 2.0% 0.11 1.6% 1.01 2.8%

HDPE (#2) 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.16 1.3% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.16 0.4%

PP (#5) 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.10 0.8% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.1% 0.11 1.6% 0.21 0.6%

PS (#6) 0.08 2.9% 0.21 3.0% 0.40 3.0% 0.05 1.4% 0.06 1.9% 0.15 2.2% 0.95 2.6%

Glass 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Aluminum 0.00 0.0% 0.02 0.3% 0.03 0.3% 0.05 1.4% 0.07 2.2% 0.03 0.4% 0.21 0.6%

Steel 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.17 5.2% 0.00 0.0% 0.17 0.5%

Gable Top 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.04 1.1% 0.33 4.9% 0.37 1.0%

Aseptic 0.05 1.8% 0.04 0.6% 0.00 0.0% 0.05 1.4% 0.02 0.6% 0.23 3.4% 0.40 1.1%

Mixed Papers Fine Paper 0.15 5.0% 0.29 4.1% 0.16 1.3% 0.01 0.4% 0.00 0.0% 0.19 2.8% 0.80 2.2%

Newspaper 0.00 0.0% 0.88 12.6% 0.86 6.6% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 1.74 4.7%

Boxboard 0.00 0.0% 0.08 1.1% 0.66 5.1% 0.04 1.1% 0.00 0.0% 0.32 4.7% 1.09 3.0%

Other Fibres 0.00 0.0% 0.29 4.1% 1.02 7.8% 0.21 5.7% 0.07 2.1% 0.43 6.3% 2.01 5.5%

Cardboard 0.00 0.0% 0.02 0.3% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.15 4.6% 0.00 0.0% 0.17 0.5%

Paper Towels 0.53 17.9% 0.67 9.6% 0.89 6.8% 3.12 85.3% 0.12 3.7% 0.46 6.7% 5.78 15.8%

Coffee Cups 0.39 13.3% 0.30 4.3% 1.84 14.2% 0.05 1.4% 0.06 1.9% 0.54 7.9% 3.18 8.7%

Organics 0.86 29.0% 2.93 42.2% 4.05 31.1% 0.00 0.0% 2.04 63.5% 3.49 51.2% 13.38 36.5%

Coffee Pods 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

LDPE Plastic Films 0.37 12.5% 0.41 5.8% 1.12 8.6% 0.00 0.0% 0.15 4.7% 0.25 3.6% 2.30 6.3%

Styrofoam 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Plastic Strapping 0.01 0.4% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.01 0.0%

Lab Plastics 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Lab Glass 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Scrap Metal  0.21 7.2% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.21 0.6%

Scrap Wood 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Electronic Waste 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Bulbs 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Batteries 0.06 2.2% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.06 0.2%

Printer Toners 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Other/Nonrecyclable 0.19 6.5% 0.49 7.1% 1.25 9.6% 0.07 1.9% 0.20 6.3% 0.18 2.6% 2.39 6.5%

QAQC Check 2.96 100.0% 6.95 100.0% 13.01 100.0% 3.65 100.0% 3.22 100.0% 6.82 100.0% 36.61 100.0%

Mixed Containers 0.18 6.1% 0.60 8.7% 1.15 8.9% 0.16 4.2% 0.42 13.1% 0.97 14.2% 3.48 9.5%

Mixed Papers 0.15 5.0% 1.53 22.0% 2.70 20.8% 0.26 7.1% 0.07 2.1% 0.94 13.8% 5.64 15.4%

Mandatory Recyclables (Reg103) 0.1 5.0% 1.2 17.4% 1.1 8.1% 0.1 1.8% 0.4 12.0% 0.2 3.2% 3.1 8.4%

Other Recyclables 2.62 88.5% 5.25 75.5% 10.70 82.3% 3.52 96.3% 2.63 81.7% 6.42 94.1% 31.14 85.1%

Non‐Recyclable 0.2 6.5% 0.5 7.1% 1.3 9.6% 0.1 1.9% 0.2 6.3% 0.2 2.6% 2.4 6.5%

QAQC Check TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0%

Food Services Dining AreasOffice Areas Public Areas Classrooms Washrooms Complex Labs Total

38.78 80.00 65.37 61.96 4.38 37.38 42.70 330.57

11.7% 24.2% 19.8% 18.7%

Office Areas Public Areas Classrooms Washrooms

3.22 6.82

12.9% 100.0%

Food Services Dining Areas Complex Labs Total

1.3% 11.3%

2.96 6.95 13.01 3.65 36.61

8.1% 19.0% 35.5% 10.0% 8.8% 18.6% 0.0% 100.0%

Page 46: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

Waste Audit Report

Trent University

Waste Reduction Group Project P0703

Table B6: Annual Waste Management & Diversion Summary

Material Stream

3Rs or 

Disposed

kg MT % kg MT %

Peterborough ‐ Waste/Garbage Disposed 260,610 260.6 100.0% 287221 287.22 97.7%

Durham ‐ Waste/Garbage Disposed 6,700 6.70 2.3%

Sub‐Total 260.6 42.3% 293.92 18.8%

Peterborough Campus

Cardboard Recycled 14,588 14.6 4.1% 499,981 499.98 39.3%

Mixed Papers Recycled 82,280 82.3 23.2% 280,585 280.59 22.1%

Mixed Containers Recycled 91,520 91.5 25.8% 365,371 365.37 28.7%

Confidential Papers Recycled 32.8 9.2% 17,999 18.00 1.4%

Scrap Metals Recycled 7,340 7.3 2.1% 15,470 15.47 1.2%

Scrap Wood Recycled 22,019 22.0 6.2% 16,532 16.53 1.3%

Organics Composted 84.0 23.7% 50,375 50.38 4.0%

Oil & Grease Recycled 0.0% 5,150 5.15 0.4%

Batteries Recycled 112 0.1 0.0% 364 0.36 0.0%

Electronic Wastes Recycled 2,182 2.2 0.6% 0.00 0.0%

Bulbs & Ballasts Recycled 504 0.5 0.1% 0.00 0.0%

Wood Pallets Reused 10,980 11.0 3.1% 450 0.45 0.04%

Printer Toners Reused 0.5 0.1% 497 0.50 0.04%

Swap Shop Reused 6.0 1.7% 9,863 9.86 0.8%

Waste Reduction Initiatives Reduction 119 0.12 0.01%

Durham Campus

Cardboard & Mixed Papers Recycled 7,646 7.65 0.6%

Mixed Containers Recycled 700 0.70 0.1%

Confidential Papers Recycled 423 0.42 0.0%

Bulbs & Ballasts Recycled 200 0.20 0.0%

Batteries Recycled 200 0.20 0.0%

Printer Toners Reused 10 0.01 0.0%

Oil & Grease Recycled 165 0.16 0.0%

Yard Wastes Recycled 0.00 0.0%

Waste Reduction Initiatives Reduction 0.00 0.0%

Sub‐Total 354.8 57.7% 1272.10 100.0%

Total Generated 615.4 100.0% 1566.02 100.0%

Total Recycled 253.3 41.2% 1210.79 77.3%

Total Reused 17.5 2.84% 10.82 0.7%

Total Reduced 0.0 ‐‐ 0.12 0.01%

Total Composted 84.0 13.6% 50.38 3.22%

Total Disposed 260.6 42.3% 293.92 18.8%

Achieved Waste Diversion Rate 57.7% 81.2%

Additioanl Recyclable Materials in Wastes Disposed to Landfill (MT) 77.6 140.0

Potential Waste Diversion Rate 70.3% 90.2%

Notes:

1. Values taken from Trent U's 2013 waste audit report.

2016 Total2013 Total1

Page 47: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

Waste Audit Report

Trent University

Waste Reduction Group Project P0703

Table B7: Champlain - Garbage Sample Summary (Jan18, 2017 & Jan20, 2017)

Waste Generating Area

Sample Size

Percent of Sample Size

kg % kg % kg % kg % kg % kg % kg % kg % kg %

Mixed Containers PET (#1) 0.40 3.0% 0.22 3.6% 0.28 9.3% 0.11 2.4% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.67 2.8% 0.21 5.6% 1.89 3.3%

HDPE (#2) 0.00 0.0% 0.44 7.2% 0.00 0.0% 0.04 0.9% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.06 1.6% 0.54 0.9%

PP (#5) 0.09 0.7% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.04 0.9% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.42 1.8% 0.03 0.8% 0.58 1.0%

PS (#6) 0.17 1.3% 0.06 1.0% 0.04 1.3% 0.22 4.9% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.41 1.7% 0.01 0.3% 0.91 1.6%

Glass 1.15 8.8% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.45 11.9% 1.60 2.8%

Aluminum 0.10 0.8% 0.00 0.0% 0.01 0.3% 0.02 0.4% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.08 2.1% 0.21 0.4%

Steel 0.22 1.7% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.22 0.4%

Gable Top 0.12 0.9% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.14 3.1% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.16 0.7% 0.02 0.5% 0.44 0.8%

Aseptic 0.05 0.4% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.05 0.1%

Mixed Papers Fine Paper 0.06 0.5% 0.05 0.8% 0.00 0.0% 0.01 0.2% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.73 19.3% 0.85 1.5%

Newspaper 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.05 1.1% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.05 0.1%

Boxboard 0.17 1.3% 0.01 0.2% 0.03 1.0% 0.11 2.4% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.38 1.6% 0.03 0.8% 0.73 1.3%

Other Fibres 0.49 3.7% 0.25 4.1% 0.06 2.0% 0.24 5.3% 0.00 0.0% 0.07 9.0% 0.47 2.0% 0.08 2.1% 1.66 2.9%

Cardboard 0.21 1.6% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.21 0.4%

Paper Towels 1.23 9.4% 2.54 41.5% 0.07 2.3% 0.25 5.5% 0.67 40.1% 0.10 12.8% 1.15 4.8% 0.14 3.7% 6.15 10.8%

Coffee Cups 0.52 4.0% 0.08 1.3% 0.16 5.3% 0.49 10.8% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.74 3.1% 0.08 2.1% 2.07 3.6%

Organics 3.88 29.6% 0.92 15.0% 1.66 55.1% 1.61 35.5% 0.11 6.6% 0.55 70.5% 16.44 68.6% 0.57 15.1% 25.74 45.2%

Coffee Pods 0.15 1.1% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.15 0.3%

LDPE Plastic Films 0.73 5.6% 0.51 8.3% 0.19 6.3% 0.70 15.5% 0.11 6.6% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.19 5.0% 2.43 4.3%

Styrofoam 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Plastic Strapping 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Lab Plastics 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Lab Glass 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Scrap Metal  0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.05 1.3% 0.05 0.1%

Scrap Wood 0.00 0.0% 0.24 3.9% 0.00 0.0% 0.02 0.4% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.26 1.1% 0.00 0.0% 0.52 0.9%

Electronic Waste 1.41 10.7% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.56 14.8% 1.97 3.5%

Bulbs 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Batteries 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.06 1.6% 0.06 0.1%

Printer Toners 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Other/Nonrecyclable 1.98 15.1% 0.80 13.1% 0.51 16.9% 0.48 10.6% 0.78 46.7% 0.06 7.7% 2.88 12.0% 0.43 11.4% 7.92 13.9%

QAQC Check 13.13 100.0% 6.12 100.0% 3.01 100.0% 4.53 100.0% 1.67 100.0% 0.78 100.0% 23.98 100.0% 3.78 100.0% 57.00 100.0%

Mixed Containers 2.30 17.5% 0.72 11.8% 0.33 11.0% 0.57 12.6% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 1.66 6.9% 0.86 22.8% 6.44 11.3%

Mixed Papers 0.72 5.5% 0.31 5.1% 0.09 3.0% 0.41 9.1% 0.00 0.0% 0.07 9.0% 0.85 3.5% 0.84 22.2% 3.29 5.8%

Mandatory Recyclables (Reg103) 1.7 13.3% 0.1 0.8% 0.0 0.3% 0.1 1.8% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 1.3 33.3% 3.1 5.5%

Other Recyclables 9.41 71.7% 5.27 86.1% 2.49 82.7% 3.97 87.6% 0.89 53.3% 0.72 92.3% 21.10 88.0% 2.09 55.3% 45.94 80.6%

Non‐Recyclable 2.0 15.1% 0.8 13.1% 0.5 16.9% 0.5 10.6% 0.8 46.7% 0.1 7.7% 2.9 12.0% 0.4 11.4% 7.9 13.9%

QAQC Check TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0%

Public Area Back of house

3.01

College Office Rooms Classrooms

1.67

Public Areas Washrooms

13.13 6.12

23.0% 10.7%

4.53

5.3% 7.9% 100.0%2.9% 6.6%42.1%1.4%

57.00

Dining Hall

Seaspoon Restaurant 

Area

0.78

Offices Total

3.7823.98

Page 48: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

Figure B1: Champlain Garbage Composition

11.3%

5.8%

0.4%

10.8%

3.6%

45.2%

4.3%13.9%

0.0%

0.0%

3.5%

0.9%

Mixed Containers Mixed Papers Cardboard Paper Towels Coffee Cups Organics

LDPE Plastic Films Other/Nonrecyclable Lab Glass Lab Plastics Electronic Waste Scrap Wood

Page 49: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

Waste Audit Report

Trent University

Waste Reduction Group Project P0703

Table B8: Gzowski - Garbage Sample Summary (Jan19, 2017)

Waste Generating Area

Sample Size

Percent of Sample Size

kg % kg % kg % kg % kg %

Mixed Containers PET (#1) 0.97 6.9% 0.05 1.0% 0.94 5.2% 0.45 3.8% 2.41 4.9%

HDPE (#2) 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

PP (#5) 0.19 1.3% 0.00 0.0% 0.05 0.3% 0.15 1.3% 0.39 0.8%

PS (#6) 0.41 2.9% 0.06 1.2% 0.96 5.4% 0.15 1.3% 1.58 3.2%

Glass 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.31 1.7% 0.00 0.0% 0.31 0.6%

Aluminum 0.08 0.6% 0.00 0.0% 0.14 0.8% 0.00 0.0% 0.22 0.4%

Steel 0.02 0.1% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.02 0.0%

Gable Top 0.13 0.9% 0.00 0.0% 0.20 1.1% 0.12 1.0% 0.45 0.9%

Aseptic 0.06 0.4% 0.00 0.0% 0.04 0.2% 0.03 0.3% 0.13 0.3%

Mixed Papers Fine Paper 0.33 2.3% 0.07 1.4% 0.13 0.7% 0.13 1.1% 0.66 1.3%

Newspaper 0.13 0.9% 0.00 0.0% 0.02 0.1% 0.00 0.0% 0.15 0.3%

Boxboard 0.51 3.6% 0.08 1.6% 0.10 0.6% 0.22 1.8% 0.91 1.9%

Other Fibres 0.41 2.9% 0.12 2.4% 0.77 4.3% 0.17 1.4% 1.47 3.0%

Cardboard 0.23 1.6% 0.00 0.0% 0.01 0.1% 0.00 0.0% 0.24 0.5%

Paper Towels 0.70 5.0% 3.54 69.4% 0.44 2.5% 1.56 13.1% 6.24 12.7%

Coffee Cups 0.44 3.1% 0.04 0.8% 2.05 11.4% 0.35 2.9% 2.88 5.9%

Organics 5.38 38.1% 0.40 7.8% 4.32 24.1% 4.56 38.3% 14.66 29.9%

Coffee Pods 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

LDPE Plastic Films 1.23 8.7% 0.26 5.1% 0.37 2.1% 0.33 2.8% 2.19 4.5%

Styrofoam 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Plastic Strapping 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.02 0.2% 0.02 0.0%

Lab Plastics 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Lab Glass 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Scrap Metal  0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Scrap Wood 0.02 0.1% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.09 0.8% 0.11 0.2%

Electronic Waste 0.03 0.2% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.03 0.1%

Bulbs 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Batteries 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Printer Toners 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Other/Nonrecyclable 2.85 20.2% 0.48 9.4% 7.09 39.5% 3.57 30.0% 13.99 28.5%

QAQC Check 14.12 100.0% 5.10 100.0% 17.94 100.0% 11.90 100.0% 49.06 100.0%

Mixed Containers 1.86 13.2% 0.11 2.2% 2.64 14.7% 0.90 7.6% 5.51 11.2%

Mixed Papers 1.38 9.8% 0.27 5.3% 1.02 5.7% 0.52 4.4% 3.19 6.5%

Mandatory Recyclables (Reg103) 0.8 5.6% 0.1 1.4% 0.6 3.4% 0.1 1.1% 1.6 3.3%

Other Recyclables 10.48 74.2% 4.55 89.2% 10.24 57.1% 8.20 68.9% 33.47 68.2%

Non‐Recyclable 2.9 20.2% 0.5 9.4% 7.1 39.5% 3.6 30.0% 14.0 28.5%

QAQC Check TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0%

49.06

Classrooms

17.94

100.0%36.6%

Total

24.3%

Dining Hall

11.90

Public Areas Washrooms

28.8% 10.4%

14.12 5.10

Page 50: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

Figure B2: Gzowski Garbage Composition

11.2%

6.5%

0.5%

12.7%

5.9%

29.9%

4.5%

28.5%

0.0%

0.0%

0.1%

0.2%

Mixed Containers Mixed Papers Cardboard Paper Towels Coffee Cups Organics

LDPE Plastic Films Other/Nonrecyclable Lab Glass Lab Plastics Electronic Waste Scrap Wood

Page 51: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

Waste Audit Report

Trent University

Waste Reduction Group Project P0703

Table B9: Environmental Science - Garbage Sample Summary (Jan19, 2017)

Waste Generating Area

Sample Size

Percent of Sample Size

kg % kg % kg % kg % kg % kg % kg %

Mixed Containers PET (#1) 0.28 5.9% 0.00 0.0% 0.18 2.9% 0.51 3.7% 0.22 2.7% 0.00 0.0% 1.19 2.1%

HDPE (#2) 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.09 0.4% 0.09 0.2%

PP (#5) 0.02 0.4% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.67 4.9% 0.15 1.9% 0.00 0.0% 0.84 1.5%

PS (#6) 0.05 1.1% 0.09 5.8% 0.06 1.0% 0.23 1.7% 0.15 1.9% 0.00 0.0% 0.58 1.0%

Glass 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Aluminum 0.09 1.9% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.06 0.4% 0.15 1.9% 0.00 0.0% 0.30 0.5%

Steel 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Gable Top 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.01 0.1% 0.05 0.6% 0.00 0.0% 0.06 0.1%

Aseptic 0.02 0.4% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.12 0.5% 0.14 0.2%

Mixed Papers Fine Paper 0.25 5.3% 0.02 1.3% 0.02 0.3% 0.73 5.3% 0.15 1.9% 1.96 8.2% 3.13 5.4%

Newspaper 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.01 0.2% 0.01 0.1% 0.01 0.1% 0.00 0.0% 0.03 0.1%

Boxboard 0.38 8.0% 0.11 7.1% 0.07 1.1% 0.26 1.9% 0.89 11.0% 0.89 3.7% 2.60 4.5%

Other Fibres 0.16 3.4% 0.26 16.8% 0.19 3.1% 0.37 2.7% 0.55 6.8% 0.16 0.7% 1.69 2.9%

Cardboard 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Paper Towels 0.95 20.0% 0.18 11.6% 4.15 67.5% 0.96 7.0% 0.87 10.8% 2.95 12.4% 10.06 17.4%

Coffee Cups 0.26 5.5% 0.19 12.3% 0.15 2.4% 0.98 7.2% 0.87 10.8% 1.19 5.0% 3.64 6.3%

Organics 1.28 26.9% 0.29 18.7% 0.00 0.0% 3.01 22.1% 0.99 12.3% 3.59 15.1% 9.16 15.8%

Coffee Pods 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

LDPE Plastic Films 0.39 8.2% 0.13 8.4% 0.05 0.8% 1.85 13.6% 0.52 6.5% 1.26 5.3% 4.20 7.3%

Styrofoam 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Plastic Strapping 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.16 0.7% 0.16 0.3%

Lab Plastics 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.26 1.9% 0.26 3.2% 1.19 5.0% 1.71 3.0%

Lab Glass 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 6.98 29.4% 6.98 12.0%

Scrap Metal  0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Scrap Wood 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Electronic Waste 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Bulbs 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Batteries 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Printer Toners 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Other/Nonrecyclable 0.63 13.2% 0.28 18.1% 1.27 20.7% 3.74 27.4% 2.23 27.7% 3.22 13.6% 11.37 19.6%

QAQC Check 4.76 100.0% 1.55 100.0% 6.15 100.0% 13.65 100.0% 8.06 100.0% 23.76 100.0% 57.93 100.0%

Mixed Containers 0.46 9.7% 0.09 5.8% 0.24 3.9% 1.48 10.8% 0.72 8.9% 0.21 0.9% 3.20 5.5%

Mixed Papers 0.79 16.6% 0.39 25.2% 0.29 4.7% 1.37 10.0% 1.60 19.9% 3.01 12.7% 7.45 12.9%

Mandatory Recyclables (Reg103) 0.3 7.1% 0.0 1.3% 0.0 0.5% 0.8 5.9% 0.3 3.8% 2.0 8.2% 3.5 6.0%

Other Recyclables 3.79 79.6% 1.25 80.6% 4.85 78.9% 9.11 66.7% 5.52 68.5% 18.58 78.2% 43.10 74.4%

Non‐Recyclable 0.6 13.2% 0.3 18.1% 1.3 20.7% 3.7 27.4% 2.2 27.7% 3.2 13.6% 11.4 19.6%

QAQC Check TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0%

4.76

2.7% 10.6% 23.6%8.2%

1.55

Common Rooms Washrooms ClassroomsPublic Areas Offices Complex Labs Total

57.93

13.9%

13.656.15

100.0%

8.06 23.76

41.0%

Page 52: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

Figure B3: Environmental Science Garbage Composition

5.5%

12.9%

0.0%

17.4%6.3%

15.8%

7.3%

19.6%12.0%

3.0%

Mixed Containers Mixed Papers Cardboard Paper Towels Coffee Cups

Organics LDPE Plastic Films Other/Nonrecyclable Lab Glass Lab Plastics

Page 53: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

Waste Audit Report

Trent University

Waste Reduction Group Project P0703

Table B10: Blackburn - Garbage Sample Summary (Jan19, 2017)

Waste Generating Area

Sample Size

Percent of Sample Size

kg % kg % kg % kg %

Mixed Containers PET (#1) 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.03 0.4% 0.03 0.3%

HDPE (#2) 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.01 0.1% 0.01 0.1%

PP (#5) 0.14 6.9% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.14 1.2%

PS (#6) 0.13 6.4% 0.00 0.0% 0.01 0.1% 0.14 1.2%

Glass 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Aluminum 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.01 0.1% 0.01 0.1%

Steel 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.02 0.2% 0.02 0.2%

Gable Top 0.01 0.5% 0.00 0.0% 0.11 1.3% 0.12 1.0%

Aseptic 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Mixed Papers Fine Paper 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 2.76 33.2% 2.76 23.2%

Newspaper 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.05 0.6% 0.05 0.4%

Boxboard 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.23 2.8% 0.23 1.9%

Other Fibres 0.05 2.5% 0.00 0.0% 0.55 6.6% 0.60 5.1%

Cardboard 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Paper Towels 0.16 7.9% 1.20 78.4% 0.76 9.1% 2.12 17.8%

Coffee Cups 0.08 3.9% 0.00 0.0% 0.75 9.0% 0.83 7.0%

Organics 0.39 19.2% 0.00 0.0% 1.22 14.7% 1.61 13.6%

Coffee Pods 0.01 0.5% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.01 0.1%

LDPE Plastic Films 0.20 9.9% 0.16 10.5% 0.12 1.4% 0.48 4.0%

Styrofoam 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Plastic Strapping 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.16 1.9% 0.16 1.3%

Lab Plastics 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Lab Glass 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Scrap Metal  0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Scrap Wood 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Electronic Waste 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Bulbs 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Batteries 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Printer Toners 0.42 20.7% 0.00 0.0% 0.19 2.3% 0.61 5.1%

Other/Nonrecyclable 0.44 21.7% 0.17 11.1% 1.34 16.1% 1.95 16.4%

QAQC Check 2.03 100.0% 1.53 100.0% 8.32 100.0% 11.88 100.0%

Mixed Containers 0.28 13.8% 0.00 0.0% 0.19 2.3% 0.47 4.0%

Mixed Papers 0.05 2.5% 0.00 0.0% 3.59 43.1% 3.64 30.6%

Mandatory Recyclables (Reg103) 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% 2.8 34.1% 2.8 23.9%

Other Recyclables 1.59 78.3% 1.36 88.9% 4.14 49.8% 7.09 59.7%

Non‐Recyclable 0.4 21.7% 0.2 11.1% 1.3 16.1% 2.0 16.4%

QAQC Check TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0%

100.0%17.1% 12.9% 70.0%

8.32 11.88

Public Areas Washrooms Offices Total

2.03 1.53

Page 54: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

Figure B4: Blackburn Garbage Composition

4.0%

30.6%

0.0%17.8%

7.0%

13.6%

4.0%

16.4%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

1.3%

5.1%

Mixed Containers Mixed Papers Cardboard Paper Towels Coffee CupsOrganics LDPE Plastic Films Other/Nonrecyclable Lab Glass Lab PlasticsElectronic Waste Scrap Wood Plastic Strapping Printer Toners

Page 55: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

Waste Audit Report

Trent University

Waste Reduction Group Project P0703

Table B10: DNA - Garbage Sample Summary (Jan19, 2017)

Waste Generating Area

Sample Size

Percent of Sample Size

kg % kg % kg % kg % kg % kg %

Mixed Containers PET (#1) 0.06 0.7% 0.00 0.0% 0.15 5.4% 0.15 1.3% 0.15 0.8% 0.51 1.0%

HDPE (#2) 0.00 0.0% 0.15 2.3% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.15 0.3%

PP (#5) 0.06 0.7% 0.00 0.0% 0.15 5.4% 0.16 1.4% 0.00 0.0% 0.37 0.8%

PS (#6) 0.22 2.4% 0.00 0.0% 0.02 0.7% 0.18 1.6% 0.12 0.6% 0.54 1.1%

Glass 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Aluminum 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.02 0.7% 0.03 0.3% 0.09 0.5% 0.14 0.3%

Steel 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.06 0.5% 0.16 0.8% 0.22 0.4%

Gable Top 0.12 1.3% 0.00 0.0% 0.05 1.8% 0.08 0.7% 0.03 0.2% 0.28 0.6%

Aseptic 0.15 1.6% 0.00 0.0% 0.01 0.4% 0.01 0.1% 0.00 0.0% 0.17 0.3%

Mixed Papers Fine Paper 0.16 1.7% 0.52 7.9% 0.16 5.8% 1.12 9.8% 0.02 0.1% 1.98 4.0%

Newspaper 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.09 0.8% 0.00 0.0% 0.09 0.2%

Boxboard 0.52 5.6% 0.01 0.2% 0.14 5.1% 0.15 1.3% 0.17 0.9% 0.99 2.0%

Other Fibres 0.75 8.1% 0.00 0.0% 0.17 6.1% 0.06 0.5% 0.00 0.0% 0.98 2.0%

Cardboard 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Paper Towels 2.66 28.8% 5.22 79.5% 0.26 9.4% 0.56 4.9% 3.66 19.3% 12.36 25.3%

Coffee Cups 0.28 3.0% 0.53 8.1% 0.23 8.3% 0.25 2.2% 0.26 1.4% 1.55 3.2%

Organics 1.55 16.8% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 1.55 13.6% 2.56 13.5% 5.66 11.6%

Coffee Pods 0.07 0.8% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.16 0.8% 0.23 0.5%

LDPE Plastic Films 0.16 1.7% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 2.58 22.6% 3.56 18.8% 6.30 12.9%

Styrofoam 0.15 1.6% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.15 1.3% 0.00 0.0% 0.30 0.6%

Plastic Strapping 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Lab Plastics 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 2.65 14.0% 2.65 5.4%

Lab Glass 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 1.19 6.3% 1.19 2.4%

Scrap Metal  0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Scrap Wood 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Electronic Waste 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Bulbs 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Batteries 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Printer Toners 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Other/Nonrecyclable 2.32 25.1% 0.14 2.1% 1.41 50.9% 4.23 37.1% 4.16 22.0% 12.26 25.1%

QAQC Check 9.23 100.0% 6.57 100.0% 2.77 100.0% 11.41 100.0% 18.94 100.0% 48.92 100.0%

Mixed Containers 0.61 6.6% 0.15 2.3% 0.40 14.4% 0.67 5.9% 0.55 2.9% 2.38 4.9%

Mixed Papers 1.43 15.5% 0.53 8.1% 0.47 17.0% 1.42 12.4% 0.19 1.0% 4.04 8.3%

Mandatory Recyclables (Reg103) 0.2 1.7% 0.5 7.9% 0.2 6.5% 1.3 11.4% 0.3 1.4% 2.4 5.0%

Other Recyclables 6.75 73.1% 5.91 90.0% 1.18 42.6% 5.88 51.5% 14.51 76.6% 34.23 70.0%

Non‐Recyclable 2.3 25.1% 0.1 2.1% 1.4 50.9% 4.2 37.1% 4.2 22.0% 12.3 25.1%

QAQC Check TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0%

Washrooms

6.57

Public Areas

9.23

18.9% 5.7%13.4% 23.3%

2.77

38.7%38.7%

Classrooms Offices

11.41

Total

18.94 48.92

Complex Labs

Page 56: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

Figure B5: DNA Garbage Composition

4.9%

8.3%

0.0%

25.3%3.2%

11.6%

12.9%

25.1%2.4%5.4%

Mixed Containers Mixed Papers Cardboard Paper Towels Coffee Cups

Organics LDPE Plastic Films Other/Nonrecyclable Lab Glass Lab Plastics

Page 57: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

Waste Audit Report

Trent University

Waste Reduction Group Project P0703

Table B12: Otonabee College - Garbage Sample Summary (Jan20, 2017)

Waste Generating Area

Sample Size

Percent of Sample Size

kg % kg % kg % kg %

Mixed Containers PET (#1) 1.80 6.6% 0.74 3.3% 1.37 6.5% 3.91 5.5%

HDPE (#2) 0.01 0.0% 0.31 1.4% 0.00 0.0% 0.32 0.5%

PP (#5) 0.52 1.9% 0.22 1.0% 0.08 0.4% 0.82 1.2%

PS (#6) 0.45 1.6% 0.26 1.2% 0.90 4.2% 1.61 2.3%

Glass 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.76 3.6% 0.76 1.1%

Aluminum 0.04 0.1% 0.06 0.3% 0.12 0.6% 0.22 0.3%

Steel 0.15 0.5% 0.02 0.1% 0.00 0.0% 0.17 0.2%

Gable Top 0.37 1.3% 0.20 0.9% 0.29 1.4% 0.86 1.2%

Aseptic 0.13 0.5% 0.00 0.0% 0.13 0.6% 0.26 0.4%

Mixed Papers Fine Paper 0.18 0.7% 0.00 0.0% 0.14 0.7% 0.32 0.5%

Newspaper 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.03 0.1% 0.03 0.0%

Boxboard 1.26 4.6% 0.96 4.3% 0.53 2.5% 2.75 3.9%

Other Fibres 1.50 5.5% 0.66 3.0% 1.10 5.2% 3.26 4.6%

Cardboard 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.01 0.0% 0.01 0.0%

Paper Towels 2.00 7.3% 11.63 52.2% 1.37 6.5% 15.00 21.2%

Coffee Cups 0.62 2.3% 0.32 1.4% 1.76 8.3% 2.70 3.8%

Organics 11.35 41.4% 2.55 11.4% 4.86 22.9% 18.76 26.5%

Coffee Pods 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

LDPE Plastic Films 1.63 5.9% 1.29 5.8% 1.22 5.8% 4.14 5.8%

Styrofoam 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Plastic Strapping 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Lab Plastics 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Lab Glass 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Scrap Metal  0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.03 0.1% 0.03 0.0%

Scrap Wood 0.02 0.1% 0.01 0.0% 0.05 0.2% 0.08 0.1%

Electronic Waste 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Bulbs 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Batteries 0.04 0.1% 0.00 0.0% 0.02 0.1% 0.06 0.1%

Printer Toners 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Other/Nonrecyclable 5.34 19.5% 3.06 13.7% 6.41 30.3% 14.81 20.9%

QAQC Check 27.41 100.0% 22.29 100.0% 21.18 100.0% 70.88 100.0%

Mixed Containers 3.47 12.7% 1.81 8.1% 3.65 17.2% 8.93 12.6%

Mixed Papers 2.94 10.7% 1.62 7.3% 1.80 8.5% 6.36 9.0%

Mandatory Recyclables (Reg103) 0.4 1.3% 0.1 0.4% 1.1 5.0% 1.5 2.1%

Other Recyclables 21.70 79.2% 19.15 85.9% 13.71 64.7% 54.56 77.0%

Non‐Recyclable 5.3 19.5% 3.1 13.7% 6.4 30.3% 14.8 20.9%

QAQC Check TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0%

Public Areas Washrooms Classrooms

38.7% 31.4%

27.41 22.29 70.88

100.0%

Total

29.9%

21.18

Page 58: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

Figure B6: Otonabee College Garbage Composition

12.6%

9.0%

0.0%

21.2%3.8%

26.5%

5.8%20.9%

Mixed Containers Mixed Papers Cardboard Paper Towels Coffee Cups Organics LDPE Plastic Films Other/Nonrecyclable

Page 59: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

Waste Audit Report

Trent University

Waste Reduction Group Project P0703

Table B13: Lady Eaton College - Garbage Sample Summary (Jan20, 2017)

Waste Generating Area

Sample Size

Percent of Sample Size

kg % kg % kg % kg % kg % kg % kg % kg %

Mixed Containers PET (#1) 0.13 2.1% 0.00 0.0% 0.04 2.7% 0.09 2.1% 0.32 3.4% 0.04 0.9% 0.23 4.3% 0.85 2.4%

HDPE (#2) 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.05 3.3% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.05 0.1%

PP (#5) 0.11 1.8% 0.00 0.0% 0.02 1.3% 0.00 0.0% 0.15 1.6% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.28 0.8%

PS (#6) 0.16 2.6% 0.00 0.0% 0.03 2.0% 0.22 5.2% 0.10 1.1% 0.02 0.4% 0.00 0.0% 0.53 1.5%

Glass 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.16 10.7% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.01 0.2% 0.17 0.5%

Aluminum 0.22 3.6% 0.12 3.3% 0.00 0.0% 0.35 8.3% 0.06 0.6% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.75 2.1%

Steel 0.01 0.2% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.01 0.0%

Gable Top 0.13 2.1% 0.00 0.0% 0.02 1.3% 0.10 2.4% 0.11 1.2% 0.00 0.0% 0.13 2.5% 0.49 1.4%

Aseptic 0.06 1.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.12 2.9% 0.01 0.1% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.19 0.5%

Mixed Papers Fine Paper 0.03 0.5% 0.01 0.3% 0.05 3.3% 0.02 0.5% 0.05 0.5% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.16 0.5%

Newspaper 0.01 0.2% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.01 0.0%

Boxboard 0.11 1.8% 0.00 0.0% 0.14 9.3% 0.13 3.1% 0.08 0.8% 0.04 0.9% 0.12 2.3% 0.62 1.8%

Other Fibres 0.11 1.8% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.06 1.4% 0.53 5.6% 0.03 0.6% 0.00 0.0% 0.73 2.1%

Cardboard 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.58 13.8% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.58 1.7%

Paper Towels 0.89 14.6% 0.35 9.7% 0.29 19.3% 0.39 9.3% 2.59 27.3% 3.78 80.4% 0.00 0.0% 8.29 23.8%

Coffee Cups 0.17 2.8% 0.00 0.0% 0.02 1.3% 0.14 3.3% 0.13 1.4% 0.01 0.2% 2.16 40.8% 2.63 7.5%

Organics 1.16 19.0% 1.26 35.0% 0.42 28.0% 0.95 22.6% 2.15 22.6% 0.02 0.4% 0.96 18.1% 6.92 19.8%

Coffee Pods 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

LDPE Plastic Films 0.02 0.3% 0.28 7.8% 0.00 0.0% 0.17 4.0% 0.12 1.3% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.59 1.7%

Styrofoam 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Plastic Strapping 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Lab Plastics 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Lab Glass 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Scrap Metal  0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.02 0.2% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.02 0.1%

Scrap Wood 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.12 2.9% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.12 0.3%

Electronic Waste 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Bulbs 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Batteries 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Printer Toners 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0%

Other/Nonrecyclable 2.78 45.6% 1.58 43.9% 0.26 17.3% 0.76 18.1% 3.08 32.4% 0.76 16.2% 1.69 31.9% 10.91 31.3%

QAQC Check 6.10 100.0% 3.60 100.0% 1.50 100.0% 4.20 100.0% 9.50 100.0% 4.70 100.0% 5.30 100.0% 34.90 100.0%

Mixed Containers 0.82 13.4% 0.12 3.3% 0.32 21.3% 0.88 21.0% 0.75 7.9% 0.06 1.3% 0.37 7.0% 3.32 9.5%

Mixed Papers 0.26 4.3% 0.01 0.3% 0.19 12.7% 0.21 5.0% 0.66 6.9% 0.07 1.5% 0.12 2.3% 1.52 4.4%

Mandatory Recyclables (Reg103) 0.3 4.4% 0.1 3.6% 0.2 14.0% 1.0 22.6% 0.1 1.2% 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.2% 1.7 4.8%

Other Recyclables 3.05 50.0% 1.89 52.5% 1.03 68.7% 2.49 59.3% 6.31 66.4% 3.94 83.8% 3.60 67.9% 22.31 63.9%

Non‐Recyclable 2.8 45.6% 1.6 43.9% 0.3 17.3% 0.8 18.1% 3.1 32.4% 0.8 16.2% 1.7 31.9% 10.9 31.3%

QAQC Check TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0%

Total

6.10

100.0%

34.90

17.5% 10.3% 27.2% 13.5%

9.50 4.70

15.2%

3.60 5.30

4.3% 12.0%

1.50 4.20

ClassroomsDining Hall OfficesPublic AreasBack of house Food

servicesResidence

Washrooms Public Washrooms

Page 60: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

Figure B7: Lady Eaton College Garbage Composition

9.5%

4.4%

1.7%

23.8% 7.5%

19.8%

1.7%

31.3%

Mixed Containers Mixed Papers Cardboard Paper Towels Coffee Cups Organics LDPE Plastic Films Other/Nonrecyclable

Page 61: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

Waste Audit Report

Trent University

Waste Reduction Group Project P0703

Table B15: Durham Campus - Garbage Sample Summary (Jan27, 2017)

Waste Generating Area 24‐hr

Sample Size 36.61

Percent of Sample Size

kg % kg % kg % kg % kg % kg % kg %

Mixed Containers PET (#1) 0.19 2.0% 0.13 1.4% 0.00 0.0% 1.38 3.5% 0.33 1.6% 0.99 4.7% 3.03 2.8% 1.01

HDPE (#2) 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.49 1.3% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.49 0.4% 0.16

PP (#5) 0.01 0.1% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.30 0.8% 0.33 1.6% 0.00 0.0% 0.64 0.6% 0.21

PS (#6) 0.18 1.9% 0.25 2.9% 0.16 1.4% 1.19 3.0% 0.46 2.2% 0.63 3.0% 2.86 2.6% 0.95

Glass 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00

Aluminum 0.22 2.2% 0.00 0.0% 0.16 1.4% 0.10 0.3% 0.08 0.4% 0.07 0.3% 0.62 0.6% 0.21

Steel 0.50 5.2% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.50 0.5% 0.17

Gable Top 0.11 1.1% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.99 4.9% 0.00 0.0% 1.10 1.0% 0.37

Aseptic 0.05 0.6% 0.16 1.8% 0.16 1.4% 0.00 0.0% 0.70 3.4% 0.13 0.6% 1.20 1.1% 0.40

Mixed Papers Fine Paper 0.00 0.0% 0.45 5.0% 0.04 0.4% 0.49 1.3% 0.58 2.8% 0.86 4.1% 2.41 2.2% 0.80

Newspaper 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 2.57 6.6% 0.00 0.0% 2.64 12.6% 5.21 4.7% 1.74

Boxboard 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.12 1.1% 1.98 5.1% 0.95 4.7% 0.23 1.1% 3.28 3.0% 1.09

Other Fibres 0.21 2.1% 0.00 0.0% 0.62 5.7% 3.06 7.8% 1.28 6.3% 0.86 4.1% 6.03 5.5% 2.01

Cardboard 0.44 4.6% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.07 0.3% 0.51 0.5% 0.17

Paper Towels 0.36 3.7% 1.59 17.9% 9.35 85.3% 2.67 6.8% 1.37 6.7% 2.01 9.6% 17.34 15.8% 5.78

Coffee Cups 0.18 1.9% 1.18 13.3% 0.16 1.4% 5.53 14.2% 1.62 7.9% 0.89 4.3% 9.55 8.7% 3.18

Organics 6.13 63.5% 2.58 29.0% 0.00 0.0% 12.15 31.1% 10.48 51.2% 8.80 42.2% 40.14 36.5% 13.38

Coffee Pods 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00

LDPE Plastic Films 0.45 4.7% 1.11 12.5% 0.00 0.0% 3.36 8.6% 0.75 3.6% 1.22 5.8% 6.89 6.3% 2.30

Styrofoam 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00

Plastic Strapping 0.00 0.0% 0.03 0.4% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.03 0.0% 0.01

Lab Plastics 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00

Lab Glass 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00

Scrap Metal  0.00 0.0% 0.64 7.2% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.64 0.6% 0.21

Scrap Wood 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00

Electronic Waste 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00

Bulbs 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00

Batteries 0.00 0.0% 0.19 2.2% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.19 0.2% 0.06

Printer Toners 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00

Other/Nonrecyclable 0.61 6.3% 0.57 6.5% 0.21 1.9% 3.75 9.6% 0.54 2.6% 1.48 7.1% 7.17 6.5% 2.39

QAQC Check 9.65 100.0% 8.87 100.0% 10.96 100.0% 39.03 100.0% 20.47 100.0% 20.86 100.0% 109.84 100.0% 36.61

Mixed Containers 1.27 13.1% 0.54 6.1% 0.47 4.2% 3.46 8.9% 2.90 14.2% 1.81 8.7% 10.44 9.5% 3.48

Mixed Papers 0.21 2.1% 0.45 5.0% 0.78 7.1% 8.10 20.8% 2.82 13.8% 4.58 22.0% 16.93 15.4% 5.64

Mandatory Recyclables (Reg103) 1.2 12.0% 0.4 5.0% 0.2 1.8% 3.2 8.1% 0.7 3.2% 3.6 17.4% 9.2 8.4% 3.1

Other Recyclables 7.88 81.7% 7.85 88.5% 10.56 96.3% 32.11 82.3% 19.27 94.1% 15.75 75.5% 93.43 85.1% 31.14

Non‐Recyclable 0.6 6.3% 0.6 6.5% 0.2 1.9% 3.8 9.6% 0.5 2.6% 1.5 7.1% 7.2 6.5% 2.4

QAQC Check TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0% TRUE 100.0%

Classroom Cafeteria 72‐hr TotalPublic Area

20.86

100.0%35.5% 19.0%

109.84

8.8%

39.03

10.0% 18.6%

8.87

8.1%

9.65 20.47

Kitchen Prep Office Washroom

10.96

Page 62: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

Appendix C

Peterborough Campus - Waste Audit Summary

Page 63: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

Ministry of the Environment Waste Form

Report of a Waste Audit

Industrial, Commercial and Institutional Establishments

As required by O. Reg. 102/94

• This report must be prepared 6 months after becoming subject to O. Reg. 102/94 and a copy retained on file for at least five years after it is prepared, and be made available to the ministry upon request.

• For large construction and demolition projects, please refer to the forms included with “A Guide to Waste Audits and Waste Reduction Work Plans for Construction and Demolition Projects as Required Under Ontario Regulation 102/94” (revised July 2008)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

Name of Owner and/or Operator of Entity(ies) and Company Name: Trent University - Peterborough Campus Name of Contact Person: Shelley Strain

Telephone #: 705-748-1011x7157

Email address: [email protected]

Street Address(es) of Entity(ies): Peterborough Campus: 1600 West Bank Drive Municipality: Peterborough Campus: Peterborough, Ontario

Type of Entity (check one)

Retail Shopping Establishments Hotels and Motels Retail Shopping Complexes Hospitals Office Buildings Educational Institutions X Restaurants Large Manufacturing Establishments

Note: O. Reg. 102/94 does not apply to multi-unit residential buildings.

II. DESCRIPTION OF ENTITY

Provide a brief overview of the entity(ties): Trent University is an educational institution with approximately 8475 FTE students which satisfies Part X of Ontario Regulation 102/94 & 103/94. O.Reg. 102/94 requires operators of educational institutions with more than 350 full- or part-time students enrolled during the calendar year to conduct an annual waste audit and implement a waste reduction work plan. O.Reg. 103/94 requires that source separation programs be implemented and maintained for fine papers, newsprint, aluminum cans, steel cans, glass beverage containers and corrugated cardboard. Trent University undertook this audit in order to assist them in reducing wastes generated on campus and/or disposed to landfill, while being in compliance with the required Regulations.

…/1

Page 64: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

III. HOW WASTE IS PRODUCED AND DECISIONS AFFECTING THE PRODUCTION OF WASTE

For each category of waste that is produced at the entity(ies), explain how the waste will be produced and how management decisions and policies will affect the production of waste.

Categories of Waste How Is the Waste Produced and What Management

Decisions/Policies Affect Its Production? PET (#1) plastic food and beverage bottles Brought onto campus or generated on campus by staff/students.

HDPE (#2) Containers Brought onto campus/generated on campus by staff/students.

Polypropylene (#5) Containers Brought onto campus or generated on campus by staff/students.

Polystyrene (#6) Containers Brought onto campus/generated on campus by staff/students.

Glass food and beverage bottles/jars Brought onto campus or generated on campus by staff/students.

Aluminum food and beverage cans Brought onto campus or generated on campus by staff/students.

Steel food and beverage cans Brought onto campus or generated on campus by staff/students.

Gable Top Containers Brought onto campus or generated on campus by staff/students.

Aseptic Containers Brought onto campus or generated on campus by staff/students.

Fine paper Brought onto campus or generated on campus by staff/students.

Newsprint Brought onto campus or generated on campus by staff/students.

Boxboard shoe boxes, cereal boxes, etc. Brought onto campus or generated on campus by staff/students.

Glossy magazines, catalogues, flyers Brought onto campus or generated on campus by staff/students.

Cardboard Brought onto campus, shipping/generated on campus by staff/students.

Paper towels Generated by staff/students on campus

Coffee cups Brought onto campus/generated on campus by staff/students.

Coffee pods Generated by staff/students on campus

Organics / Food Waste Brought onto campus/generated on campus by staff/students.

LDPE (#4) plastic film Brought onto campus/generated on campus by staff/students.

Styrofoam Brought onto campus/generated on campus by staff/students.

Plastics Strapping Generated by staff/students on campus

Lab Glass/Plastics Generated by staff/students on campus

Scrap Woods Generated by staff/students on campus

Scrap Metals Generated by staff/students on campus

Electronic Wastes Brought onto campus/generated on campus by staff/students.

Bulbs & Ballasts Generated by staff/students on campus

Batteries Brought onto campus/generated on campus by staff/students.

Printer Toners Generated by staff/students on campus

Oil & Grease Generated by staff/students on campus

Yard Wastes Generated by staff/students on campus

Donations/Swap-Shop Generated by staff/students on campus

Waste Reduction Initiatives Generated by staff/students on campus

Other / Non-Recyclable Generated by staff/students on campus Note: When completing this form, write “n/a” in the columns where the entity will not produce any waste for a category of waste.

…/2

Page 65: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

IV. MANAGEMENT OF WASTE For each category of waste listed below, indicate which waste items will be disposed or reused/recycled and how each item will be managed at the entity(ies).

Category Waste to be Disposed Reused or Recycled Waste PET (#1) plastic food and beverage bottles

Staff/Students may place in garbage Staff/Students may place in recycling containers.

HDPE (#2) Containers Staff/Students may place in garbage Staff/Students may place in recycling

containers.

Polypropylene (#5) Containers Staff/Students may place in garbage Staff/Students may place in recycling

containers.

Polystyrene (#6) Containers Staff/Students may place in garbage Staff/Students may place in recycling

containers.

Glass food and beverage bottles/jars Staff/Students may place in garbage Staff/Students may place in recycling

containers.

Aluminum food and beverage cans Staff/Students may place in garbage Staff/Students may place in recycling

containers.

Steel food and beverage cans Staff/Students may place in garbage Staff/Students may place in recycling

containers.

Gable Top Containers Staff/Students may place in garbage Staff/Students may place in recycling

containers.

Aseptic Containers Staff/Students may place in garbage Staff/Students may place in recycling

containers.

Fine paper Staff/Students may place in garbage Staff/Students may place in recycling

containers.

Newsprint Staff/Students may place in garbage Staff/Students may place in recycling

containers. Boxboard shoe boxes, cereal boxes, etc.

Staff/Students may place in garbage Staff/Students may place in recycling containers.

Glossy magazines, catalogues, flyers Staff/Students may place in garbage Staff/Students may place in recycling

containers.

Cardboard Staff/Students may place in garbage Staff/Students may place in recycling

containers. Paper towels Staff/Students place in garbage No 3Rs Program.

Coffee cups Staff/Students place in garbage No 3Rs Program.

Coffee pods Staff/Students place in garbage No 3Rs Program.

Organics / Food Waste Staff/Students may place in garbage Staff/Students may place in recycling

containers. LDPE (#4) plastic film Staff/Students place in garbage No 3Rs Program.

Styrofoam Staff/Students place in garbage No 3Rs Program.

Plastics Strapping Staff/Students place in garbage No 3Rs Program.

Lab Glass/Plastics Staff/Students place in garbage No 3Rs Program.

Scrap Woods Staff/Students may place in garbage Staff/Students may place in recycling

containers.

Scrap Metals Staff/Students may place in garbage Staff/Students may place in recycling

containers.

Electronic Wastes Staff/Students may place in garbage Staff/Students may place in recycling

containers. Bulbs & Ballasts Staff may place in garbage Staff may place in recycling containers.

Batteries Staff/Students may place in garbage Staff/Students may place in recycling

containers.

Printer Toners Staff/Students may place in garbage Staff/Students may place in recycling

containers. Oil & Grease Staff may place in garbage Staff may place in recycling containers.

Yard Wastes Staff may place in garbage Staff may leave in place for grasscycling.

Donations/Swap-Shop Staff/Students may place in garbage Staff/Students may place in recycling

containers. Other / Non-Recyclable Staff/students place in garbage Not applicable. Note: When completing this form, write “n/a” in the columns where the entity will not produce any waste for a category of waste.

Page 66: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

V. ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF WASTE PRODUCED Peterborough CampusCategories of Waste

"A" Base Year

"B" Current Year

"C" * Change (B - A)

"A" Base Year

"B" Current Year

"C" * Change (B - A)

"A" Base Year

"B" Current Year

"C" * Change (B - A)

"A" Base Year

"B" Current Year

"C" * Change (B - A)

Tonnes Tonnes Tonnes Tonnes Tonnes Tonnes Tonnes Tonnes Tonnes Tonnes Tonnes TonnesPET (#1) plastic food and beverage bottles 68.71 136.99 68.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.17 127.80 78.63 19.54 9.19 -10.35HDPE (#2) Containers 5.45 15.38 9.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.90 14.35 10.45 1.55 1.03 -0.52Polypropylene (#5) Containers 0.65 42.18 41.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.47 39.35 38.89 0.18 2.83 2.65Polystyrene (#6) Containers 0.00 79.46 79.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 74.13 74.13 0.00 5.33 5.33Glass food and beverage bottles/jars 18.76 32.98 14.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.42 30.76 17.34 5.33 2.21 -3.12Aluminum food and beverage cans 11.62 23.88 12.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.32 22.28 13.96 3.31 1.60 -1.70Steel food and beverage cans 0.00 9.59 9.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.95 8.95 0.00 0.64 0.64Gable Top/Milk Containers 7.83 35.62 27.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.60 33.23 27.63 2.23 2.39 0.16Aseptic Containers 1.96 15.58 13.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.40 14.53 13.13 0.56 1.05 0.49Fine paper 112.50 110.95 -1.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 98.07 103.17 5.10 14.43 7.78 -6.65Newsprint 1.92 18.70 16.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.58 17.13 15.56 0.35 1.56 1.22Boxboard shoe boxes, cereal boxes, etc. 25.52 86.48 60.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.90 79.24 58.35 4.62 7.24 2.62Glossy magazines, catalogues, flyers 4.61 108.08 103.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.78 99.04 95.26 0.84 9.04 8.21Corrugated Cardboard 14.80 500.88 486.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.59 499.98 485.39 0.21 0.90 0.69Paper Towels 12.80 52.32 39.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.80 52.32 39.53Coffee Cups 9.33 14.16 4.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.33 14.16 4.83Coffee Pods 0.00 0.34 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.34Organics 135.92 122.07 -13.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 84.00 50.38 -33.63 51.92 71.69 19.77LDPE (#4) Plastic Films 1.04 17.66 16.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.04 17.66 16.63Styrofoam (#6) Plastic 0.25 0.26 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.26 0.01Plastic Strapping 0.00 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.30Lab Glass 0.00 7.10 7.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.10 7.10Lab Plastics 0.00 3.79 3.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.79 3.79Scrap Wood/Pallets 33.16 17.70 -15.46 10.98 0.45 -10.53 22.02 16.53 -5.49 0.16 0.72 0.56Scrap Metal 8.12 15.56 7.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.34 15.47 8.13 0.78 0.09 -0.69Electronic Wastes 2.18 1.74 -0.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.18 0.00 -2.18 0.00 1.74 1.74Fluorescent Bulbs 0.50 0.00 -0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 -0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00Batteries 0.11 0.47 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.36 0.25 0.00 0.10 0.10Printer Toners 0.50 1.03 0.53 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.53Oil & Grease 0.00 5.15 5.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.15 5.15 0.00 0.00 0.00Yard Wastes 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Donations/Swap Shop 6.00 9.86 3.86 6.00 9.86 3.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Reduction Initiatives 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Other/Nonrecyclable 131.20 63.61 -67.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 131.20 63.61 -67.59Total 615.45 1549.98 934.53 17.48 10.93 -6.55 337.34 1251.83 914.48 260.62 287.22 26.60Percent Change (C ÷A x 100 ) 151.8% -37.5% 271.1% 10.2%Note: When completing this form, write “n/a” in the “Estimated Amount of Waste Produced” column where the entity will not produce any waste for a category of waste.* Fill out these columns each year following the initial waste audit or baseline year to determine the progress that is being made by your waste reduction program.Base year taken as 2013

Estimated Amount of WasteGenerated Reduced/Reused Recycled Disposed

Page 67: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

VI. EXTENT TO WHICH MATERIALS OR PRODUCTS USED OR SOLD BY THE ENTITY CONSIST

OF RECYCLED OR REUSED MATERIALS OR PRODUCTS

Please answer the following questions:

1. Do you have a management policy in place that promotes the purchasing and/or use of materials or products that consist of recycled and/or reused materials or products? If yes, please describe. No formal “green” purchasing policy is in place at Trent University. However, the different purchasing departments at Trent University do consider environmental impacts of their purchases whenever options are available and feasible.

2. Do you have plans to increase the extent to which materials or products used or sold*

consist of recycled or reused materials or products? If yes, please describe.

Not applicable. * Information regarding materials or products “sold” that consist of recycled or reused materials or products is only required from owner(s) of retail shopping establishments and the owner(s) or operator(s) of large manufacturing establishments. Please attach any additional page(s) as required to answer the above questions.

I hereby certify that the information provided in this Report of Waste Audit is complete and correct.

Signature of authorized official:

Title: Date:

…/5

Page 68: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

Appendix D

Peterborough Campus - Waste Reduction Work Plan

Page 69: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

Ministry of the Environment Waste Form

Report of a Waste Reduction Work Plan

Industrial, Commercial and Institutional Establishments

As required by O. Reg. 102/94

This report must be prepared 6 months after becoming subject to O. Reg. 102/94 and a copy retained on file for at least five years after it is prepared, and be made available to the ministry upon request. I. GENERAL INFORMATION

Name of Owner and/or Operator of Entity(ies) and Company Name: Trent University - Peterborough Campus Name of Contact Person: Shelley Strain

Telephone #: 705-748-1011x7157

Email address: [email protected]

Street Address(es) of Entity(ies): Peterborough Campus: 1600 West Bank Drive Municipality: Peterborough Campus: Peterborough, Ontario

Type of Entity (check one)

Retail Shopping Establishments Hotels and Motels Retail Shopping Complexes Hospitals Office Buildings Educational Institutions X Restaurants Large Manufacturing Establishments Note: O. Reg. 102/94 does not apply to multi-unit residential buildings.

II. DESCRIPTION OF THE ENTITY

Provide a brief overview of the entity(ties): Trent University is an educational institution with approximately 8475 FTE students which satisfies Part X of Ontario Regulation 102/94 & 103/94. O.Reg. 102/94 requires operators of educational institutions with more than 350 full- or part-time students enrolled during the calendar year to conduct an annual waste audit and implement a waste reduction work plan. O.Reg. 103/94 requires that source separation programs be implemented and maintained for fine papers, newsprint, aluminum cans, steel cans, glass beverage containers and corrugated cardboard. Trent University undertook this audit in order to assist them in reducing wastes generated on campus and/or disposed to landfill, while being in compliance with the required Regulations.

…/1

Page 70: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

III. PLANS TO REDUCE, REUSE AND RECYCLE WASTE

For each category of waste described in Part V of “Report of a Waste Audit” (on which this plan is based), explain what your plans are to Reduce, Reuse and Recycle the waste, including: 1) how the waste will be source separated at the establishment, and 2) the programs to reduce, reuse and recycle all source separated waste. Waste Category (as stated in Part V

of your “Report of a Waste Audit”)

Source Separation and 3Rs Program

Mixed Containers (PET, HDPE, LDPE, PP, PS, Aluminum, Steel, Glass, Aseptic)

“Mixed Container 3Rs Program” Reduce: Staff/Students will be encouraged to bring reusable containers food/beveragecontainers for lunch and breaks. Trent Universitywill encourage suppliers to reduce theamountofpolystyreneusedtotransportsupplies.TrentUniversitywillencouragesuppliersto reduce the amount of plastic film andwrappingmaterials used to transport supplies.TrentUniversityaddedwaterbottlerefillingstationsoncampus.Thesestationshelpedtheuniversityreducetheamountofplasticwaterbottlesusedoncampus.Reuse:Staff/Studentswillbeencouragedtoreuseplasticcratesandtoteswhereverpossible.TrentUniversityimplementedareusablemugdiscountprogram.Recycle: Staff/Studentswillbeprovidedwithrecyclingbinsinhighwastegeneratingareasand food service areas formixed containers. Staff/Studentswill be encouraged to placemixed containers in appropriate recycling bins with appropriate signage affixed to thereceptacle.Receptacleswillbeemptiedonaregularbasisbeforetheybecomefullintolargerollawaybinsforcollectionasrequired.

Mixed Papers (Fine Paper, newsprint, boxboard, other recyclable papers)

“Mixed Paper 3Rs Program” Reduce: Staff/Studentswillbeencouragedtoprintonbothsidesofeachpieceofpaperaswellasnotprintwhen it isunnecessary.Staff/Studentswillbeencouragedtotakereadingmaterialshomewiththemaftertheyarefinishedwiththem.Staffandstudentswillbesent,via email, news sources that are available online opposed to purchasing paper copies ofnews. Reuse: Discardedpaperwithprintonlyononesidewillbeusedfornotepads/scrappaper. Staff/Studentswillbeencouragedtoleavenewspaperstheyarefinishedreadingincommonareas for others to read. Staff/Students will be reminded of the existing LCBO/Beer Storereturnprogram. Recycle: Staff/Studentswill be providedwith instructions via email. Receptacleswill beprovided ineachoffice,classroomandhighwastegeneratingareas.Staff/Studentswillbeencouraged to place newsprint, fine paper, boxboard, magazines, molded papers, etc inappropriaterecyclingbinswithappropriatesignageaffixed tothereceptacle. Receptacleswill be emptied on a regular basis before they become full into large roll away bins forcollectionasrequired.

Confidential Papers

“Confidential Paper 3Rs Program” Reduce: None. Reuse: None. Recycle: Staff/Students will be reminded of the existing program. Receptacleswillbeprovidedin each designated area as required. Staff/Students will be encouraged to place allconfidentialpaper in thedesignatedconsoles.Contactorwillemptyconsolesappropriatelyforshreddingandrecyclingasrequired.

Cardboard

“Cardboard 3Rs Program” Reduce: SupplierswillbeencouragedtomakeuseofreusablecontainersfortheshipmentofsuppliestoTrentUniversity. Reuse: Cardboardboxeswillbereusedforshipmentswhenappropriate. Recycle: Staff/Students will be reminded of the existing program. Cleaners will be trained on where to dispose of waste correctly.

Paper Towels No 3Rs Program

Organics

“Organics 3Rs Program” Reduce: Studentswillbeencouragedtobringuneatenfooditemshomeafterlunchbreaksoruneaten.Non‐perishablefooditemscanbedonatedtoalocalfooddrive. Reuse: Staff/Students provided with reusable china in some food service areas. Recycle: Staff/Students will be continually reminded of the existing program. Kitchen staff &

Page 71: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

cleaners trained on where to dispose of waste correctly. Signs improved relating to organics program to assist staff/students in sorting organic stream correctly. Selling of disposable food containers discouraged on campus, and if sold, containers should be compostable. Updated organics handouts for staff/student education/training program. Training of food service staff regarding improvements to organics program.

Coffee Cups, Coffee pods

No 3Rs Programs

LDPE (#4) films, Styrofoam, Plastic Strapping

No 3Rs Programs

Lab glass and plastics

No 3Rs Programs

Scrap Woods/ Wood Pallets

“Scrap Woods/Wood Pallets 3Rs Program” Reduce: StafftomonitoruseofPallettoeliminate/reducebrokenpallets. Reuse: Staff will be reminded of the existing program. Staff/StudentswillbeencouragedtousescrapwoodbeforenewwoodispurchasedforuseattheUniversity. Recycle: Staff will be reminded of scrap wood recycling program.

Scrap Metals

“Scrap Metals 3Rs Program” Reduce: Trent Universitywillinvestigatethroughmetaloptimizationstudytoinsuresteelisusedwithaslittlescrapgeneratedaspossible. Reuse: None. Recycle: Staff will be reminded of the existing program.

Electronic Wastes

“Electronic Wastes 3Rs Program” Reduce: None. Reuse: Staff/students will be encouraged to reuse/donate electronic wastes if possible. . Recycle: Staff/Students will be reminded of the existing program, continue collecting for proper recycling of waste materials.

Bulbs & Ballasts

“Bulbs & Ballasts 3Rs Program” Reduce: None. Reuse: None. Recycle: Staff/Students will be reminded of the existing program.

Batteries

“Batteries 3Rs Program” Reduce: None. Reuse: None. Recycle: Staff/Students will be reminded of the existing program.

Printer Toners

“Printer Toners 3Rs Program” Reduce: None. Reuse: Staff/Students will be reminded of the existing program. Recycle: Staff/Students will be reminded of the existing program.

Oil & Grease

“Oil & Grease 3Rs Program” Reduce: None. Reuse: None. Recycle: Staff/Students will be reminded of the existing program.

Yard Wastes

“Yard Wastes 3Rs Program” Reduce: None. Reuse: None. Recycle: Staff will be reminded of the existing program. Grass clippings to be left after mowing. Trimmings to be mulched and/or recycled//composted on-site.

Donations/Swap Shop

“Donations/Swap Shop 3Rs Program” Reduce: None. Reuse: Staff/Students will be reminded of the existing programs. Recycle: None.

Page 72: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

IV. RESPONSIBILITY FOR IMPLEMENTING THE WASTE REDUCTION WORK PLAN

Identify who is responsible for implementing the Waste Reduction Work Plan at your entity(ies). If more than one person is responsible for implementation, identify each person who is responsible and indicate the part of the Waste Reduction Work Plan that each person is responsible for implementing.

Name of Person Responsibility Telephone # PeterboroughCampus

Shelley Strain All diversion programs or will direct toappropriateperson(s).

705-748-1011x7157

.../2 V. TIMETABLE FOR IMPLEMENTING WASTE REDUCTION WORK PLAN

Provide a timetable indicating when each Source Separation and 3Rs program of the Waste Reduction Work Plan will be implemented.

Source Separation and 3Rs Program

Schedule for Completion

Mixed Containers 3Rs Program currently in place. Continual improvement to signageandadditionalpromotionalcampaignstobeconsidered.

Mixed Papers 3Rs Program currently in place. Continual improvement to signageandadditionalpromotionalcampaignstobeconsidered.

Confidential Papers 3Rs Program currently in place. Continual improvement to signageandadditionalpromotionalcampaignstobeconsidered.

Cardboard 3Rs Program currently in place. Continual improvement to signageandadditionalpromotionalcampaignstobeconsidered.

Organics 3Rs Program currently in place. Continual improvement to signageandadditionalpromotionalcampaignstobeconsidered.

Scrap Wood/Wood Pallets

3Rs Program currently in place. Continual improvement to signageandadditionalpromotionalcampaignstobeconsidered.

Scrap Metals 3Rs Program currently in place. Continual improvement to signageandadditionalpromotionalcampaignstobeconsidered.

Electronic Waste 3Rs Program currently in place. Continual improvement to signageandadditionalpromotionalcampaignstobeconsidered.

Bulbs & Ballasts 3Rs Program currently in place. Continual improvement to signageandadditionalpromotionalcampaignstobeconsidered.

Batteries 3Rs Program currently in place. Continual improvement to signageandadditionalpromotionalcampaignstobeconsidered.

Printer Toners 3Rs Program currently in place. Continual improvement to signageandadditionalpromotionalcampaignstobeconsidered.

Oil & Grease 3Rs Program currently in place. Continual improvement to signageandadditionalpromotionalcampaignstobeconsidered.

Yard Wastes 3Rs Program currently in place. Continual improvement to signageandadditionalpromotionalcampaignstobeconsidered.

Donations/Swap Shop 3Rs Program currently in place. Continual improvement to signageandadditionalpromotionalcampaignstobeconsidered.

Page 73: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

VI. COMMUNICATION TO STAFF, CUSTOMERS, GUESTS AND VISITORS Explain how the Waste Reduction Work Plan will be communicated to employees, customers, tenants, guests/visitors and students: ExplainhowtheWasteReductionWorkPlanwillbecommunicatedtoemployees,customers,tenants,guests/visitors and students. Sustainability committee will review and develop a work plan to bepostedoncampusforstaffandstudents.Additionalpromotionalcampaignswillalsobeconsideredtotargetspecificaudiencesforspecificprograms.Continuetoimproveeducationalmaterials(hand‐outs,flyers)andsignageacrosscampusasrequired.

…/3

VII. ESTIMATED WASTE PRODUCED BY MATERIAL TYPE AND THE PROJECTED AMOUNT

Material Categories (as stated in

Part III)

Estimated Annual Waste

Produced * (tonnes)

Name of Proposed 3Rs

Program (as stated in Part III)

Projections to Reduce, Reuse or Recycle Waste

(tonnes)

Estimated Annual Amount to be Diverted **

(%)

Reduce Reuse Recycle PET (#1) plastic food and beverage bottles

136.99 Mixed Container 3Rs

Program 127.80 93%

HDPE (#2) Containers

15.38 Mixed Container 3Rs

Program 14.35 93%

Polypropylene (#5) Containers

42.18 Mixed Container 3Rs

Program 39.35 93%

Polystyrene (#6) Containers

79.46 Mixed Container 3Rs

Program 74.13 93%

Glass food and beverage bottles/jars

32.98 Mixed Container 3Rs

Program 30.76 93%

Aluminum food and beverage cans

23.88 Mixed Container 3Rs

Program 22.28 93%

Steel food and beverage cans

9.59 Mixed Container 3Rs

Program 8.95 93%

Gable Top Containers

35.62 Mixed Container 3Rs

Program 33.23 93%

Aseptic Containers

15.58 Mixed Container 3Rs

Program 14.53 93%

Fine paper 110.95 Mixed Papers &

Confidential Paper 3Rs Program

103.17 93%

Newsprint 18.70 Mixed Papers 3Rs Program 17.13 92%

Boxboard shoe boxes, cereal boxes, etc.

86.48 Mixed Papers 3Rs Program 79.24 92%

Glossy magazines, catalogues, flyers

108.08 Mixed Papers 3Rs Program 99.04 92%

Cardboard 500.88 Cardboard 3Rs Program 499.98 100%

Paper towels 52.32 No 3Rs Program NA

Coffee cups 14.16 No 3Rs Program NA

Coffee pods 0.34 No 3Rs Program NA

Organics / Food Waste

122.07 Organics 3Rs Program 73.24 60%

LDPE (#4) plastic film

17.66 No 3Rs Program NA

Styrofoam 0.26 No 3Rs Program NA

Plastics Strapping 0.30 No 3Rs Program NA

Page 74: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

Lab Glass 7.10 No 3Rs Program NA Lab Plastics 3.79 No 3Rs Program NA

Scrap Woods 17.70 Scrap Woods/Pallets 3Rs

Program 0.45 16.53 96%

Scrap Metals 15.56 Scrap Metals 3Rs Program 15.47 99%

Electronic Wastes 1.74 Electronic Wastes 3Rs

Program 1.56 90%

Bulbs & Ballasts 0.00 Bulbs & Ballasts 3Rs

Program 0.00 90%

Batteries 0.47 Batteries 3Rs Program 0.36 78% Printer Toners 1.03 Printer Toners 3Rs Program 0.62 60% Oil & Grease 5.15 Oil & Grease 3Rs Program 5.15 100% Yard Wastes unknown Yard Wastes 3Rs Program Unknown 100% Donations/Swap-Shop

9.86 Donations/Swap Shop 3Rs

Program 9.86 100%

Other Reduction Initiatives

0.12 Reduction Programs 0.12 100%

Other / Non-Recyclable

63.61 No 3Rs Program NA

* Estimated Waste Produced = Waste Diverted (3Rs) + Waste Disposed ** Estimated Waste Diversion Rate = Amount of Waste Diverted (3Rs) ÷ Estimated Waste Produced x 100%

I hereby certify that the information provided in this Waste Reduction Work Plan is complete and correct. Signature of authorized official:

Title: Date:

.../4

Page 75: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

Appendix E

Durham Campus - Waste Audit Summary

Page 76: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

Ministry of the Environment Waste Form

Report of a Waste Audit

Industrial, Commercial and Institutional Establishments

As required by O. Reg. 102/94

• This report must be prepared 6 months after becoming subject to O. Reg. 102/94 and a copy retained on file for at least five years after it is prepared, and be made available to the ministry upon request.

• For large construction and demolition projects, please refer to the forms included with “A Guide to Waste Audits and Waste Reduction Work Plans for Construction and Demolition Projects as Required Under Ontario Regulation 102/94” (revised July 2008)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

Name of Owner and/or Operator of Entity(ies) and Company Name: Trent University - Durham Campus Name of Contact Person: Shelley Strain

Telephone #: 705-748-1011x7157

Email address: [email protected]

Street Address(es) of Entity(ies): Durham Campus: 55 Thornton Road South Municipality: Durham Campus: Oshawa, Ontario

Type of Entity (check one)

Retail Shopping Establishments Hotels and Motels Retail Shopping Complexes Hospitals Office Buildings Educational Institutions X Restaurants Large Manufacturing Establishments

Note: O. Reg. 102/94 does not apply to multi-unit residential buildings.

II. DESCRIPTION OF ENTITY

Provide a brief overview of the entity(ties): Trent University is an educational institution with approximately 8475 FTE students which satisfies Part X of Ontario Regulation 102/94 & 103/94. O.Reg. 102/94 requires operators of educational institutions with more than 350 full- or part-time students enrolled during the calendar year to conduct an annual waste audit and implement a waste reduction work plan. O.Reg. 103/94 requires that source separation programs be implemented and maintained for fine papers, newsprint, aluminum cans, steel cans, glass beverage containers and corrugated cardboard. Trent University undertook this audit in order to assist them in reducing wastes generated on campus and/or disposed to landfill, while being in compliance with the required Regulations.

…/1

Page 77: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

III. HOW WASTE IS PRODUCED AND DECISIONS AFFECTING THE PRODUCTION OF WASTE

For each category of waste that is produced at the entity(ies), explain how the waste will be produced and how management decisions and policies will affect the production of waste.

Categories of Waste How Is the Waste Produced and What Management

Decisions/Policies Affect Its Production? PET (#1) plastic food and beverage bottles Brought onto campus or generated on campus by staff/students.

HDPE (#2) Containers Brought onto campus/generated on campus by staff/students.

Polypropylene (#5) Containers Brought onto campus or generated on campus by staff/students.

Polystyrene (#6) Containers Brought onto campus/generated on campus by staff/students.

Glass food and beverage bottles/jars Brought onto campus or generated on campus by staff/students.

Aluminum food and beverage cans Brought onto campus or generated on campus by staff/students.

Steel food and beverage cans Brought onto campus or generated on campus by staff/students.

Gable Top Containers Brought onto campus or generated on campus by staff/students.

Aseptic Containers Brought onto campus or generated on campus by staff/students.

Fine paper Brought onto campus or generated on campus by staff/students.

Newsprint Brought onto campus or generated on campus by staff/students.

Boxboard shoe boxes, cereal boxes, etc. Brought onto campus or generated on campus by staff/students.

Glossy magazines, catalogues, flyers Brought onto campus or generated on campus by staff/students.

Cardboard Brought onto campus, shipping/generated on campus by staff/students.

Paper towels Generated by staff/students on campus

Coffee cups Brought onto campus/generated on campus by staff/students.

Coffee pods Generated by staff/students on campus

Organics / Food Waste Brought onto campus/generated on campus by staff/students.

LDPE (#4) plastic film Brought onto campus/generated on campus by staff/students.

Styrofoam Brought onto campus/generated on campus by staff/students.

Plastics Strapping Generated by staff/students on campus

Lab Glass/Plastics Generated by staff/students on campus

Scrap Woods Generated by staff/students on campus

Scrap Metals Generated by staff/students on campus

Electronic Wastes Brought onto campus/generated on campus by staff/students.

Bulbs & Ballasts Generated by staff/students on campus

Batteries Brought onto campus/generated on campus by staff/students.

Printer Toners Generated by staff/students on campus

Oil & Grease Generated by staff/students on campus

Yard Wastes Generated by staff/students on campus

Donations/Swap-Shop Generated by staff/students on campus

Waste Reduction Initiatives Generated by staff/students on campus

Other / Non-Recyclable Generated by staff/students on campus Note: When completing this form, write “n/a” in the columns where the entity will not produce any waste for a category of waste.

…/2

Page 78: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

IV. MANAGEMENT OF WASTE For each category of waste listed below, indicate which waste items will be disposed or reused/recycled and how each item will be managed at the entity(ies).

Category Waste to be Disposed Reused or Recycled Waste PET (#1) plastic food and beverage bottles

Staff/Students may place in garbage Staff/Students may place in recycling containers.

HDPE (#2) Containers Staff/Students may place in garbage Staff/Students may place in recycling

containers.

Polypropylene (#5) Containers Staff/Students may place in garbage Staff/Students may place in recycling

containers.

Polystyrene (#6) Containers Staff/Students may place in garbage Staff/Students may place in recycling

containers.

Glass food and beverage bottles/jars Staff/Students may place in garbage Staff/Students may place in recycling

containers.

Aluminum food and beverage cans Staff/Students may place in garbage Staff/Students may place in recycling

containers.

Steel food and beverage cans Staff/Students may place in garbage Staff/Students may place in recycling

containers.

Gable Top Containers Staff/Students may place in garbage Staff/Students may place in recycling

containers.

Aseptic Containers Staff/Students may place in garbage Staff/Students may place in recycling

containers.

Fine paper Staff/Students may place in garbage Staff/Students may place in recycling

containers.

Newsprint Staff/Students may place in garbage Staff/Students may place in recycling

containers. Boxboard shoe boxes, cereal boxes, etc.

Staff/Students may place in garbage Staff/Students may place in recycling containers.

Glossy magazines, catalogues, flyers Staff/Students may place in garbage Staff/Students may place in recycling

containers.

Cardboard Staff/Students may place in garbage Staff/Students may place in recycling

containers. Paper towels Staff/Students place in garbage No 3Rs Program.

Coffee cups Staff/Students place in garbage No 3Rs Program.

Coffee pods Staff/Students place in garbage No 3Rs Program.

Organics / Food Waste Staff/Students place in garbage No 3Rs Program.

LDPE (#4) plastic film Staff/Students place in garbage No 3Rs Program.

Styrofoam Staff/Students place in garbage No 3Rs Program.

Plastics Strapping Staff/Students place in garbage No 3Rs Program.

Lab Glass/Plastics Staff/Students place in garbage No 3Rs Program.

Scrap Woods Staff/Students place in garbage No 3Rs Program.

Scrap Metals Staff/Students place in garbage No 3Rs Program.

Electronic Wastes Staff/Students place in garbage No 3Rs Program.

Bulbs & Ballasts Staff may place in garbage Staff may place in recycling containers.

Batteries Staff/Students may place in garbage Staff/Students may place in recycling

containers.

Printer Toners Staff/Students may place in garbage Staff/Students may place in recycling

containers. Oil & Grease Staff may place in garbage Staff may place in recycling containers.

Yard Wastes Staff may place in garbage Staff may leave in place for grasscycling.

Donations/Swap-Shop Staff/Students place in garbage No 3Rs Program.

Other / Non-Recyclable Staff/students place in garbage Not applicable. Note: When completing this form, write “n/a” in the columns where the entity will not produce any waste for a category of waste.

Page 79: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

V. ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF WASTE PRODUCED Durham CampusCategories of Waste

"A" Base Year

"B" Current Year

"C" * Change (B - A)

"A" Base Year

"B" Current Year

"C" * Change (B - A)

"A" Base Year

"B" Current Year

"C" * Change (B - A)

"A" Base Year

"B" Current Year

"C" * Change (B - A)

Tonnes Tonnes Tonnes Tonnes Tonnes Tonnes Tonnes Tonnes Tonnes Tonnes Tonnes TonnesPET (#1) plastic food and beverage bottles 0.47 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.00HDPE (#2) Containers 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00Polypropylene (#5) Containers 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00Polystyrene (#6) Containers 0.27 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.00Glass food and beverage bottles/jars 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00Aluminum food and beverage cans 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00Steel food and beverage cans 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00Gable Top/Milk Containers 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00Aseptic Containers 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00Fine paper 1.57 1.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.26 1.26 0.00 0.31 0.31 0.00Newsprint 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00Boxboard shoe boxes, cereal boxes, etc. 1.07 1.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.78 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.00Glossy magazines, catalogues, flyers 1.34 1.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.97 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.00Corrugated Cardboard 4.92 4.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.89 4.89 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00Paper Towels 1.06 1.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.06 1.06 0.00Coffee Cups 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00Coffee Pods 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Organics 2.45 2.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.45 2.45 0.00LDPE (#4) Plastic Films 0.42 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.42 0.00Styrofoam (#6) Plastic 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Plastic Strapping 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Lab Glass 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Lab Plastics 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Scrap Wood/Pallets 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Scrap Metal 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00Electronic Wastes 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Fluorescent Bulbs 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Batteries 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00Printer Toners 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Oil & Grease 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Yard Wastes 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Donations/Swap Shop 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Reduction Initiatives 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Other/Nonrecyclable 0.44 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.44 0.00Total 16.04 16.04 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 9.33 9.33 0.00 6.70 6.70 0.00Percent Change (C ÷A x 100 ) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%Note: When completing this form, write “n/a” in the “Estimated Amount of Waste Produced” column where the entity will not produce any waste for a category of waste.* Fill out these columns each year following the initial waste audit or baseline year to determine the progress that is being made by your waste reduction program.Base year taken as 2016.

Estimated Amount of WasteGenerated Reduced/Reused Recycled Disposed

Page 80: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

VI. EXTENT TO WHICH MATERIALS OR PRODUCTS USED OR SOLD BY THE ENTITY CONSIST

OF RECYCLED OR REUSED MATERIALS OR PRODUCTS

Please answer the following questions:

1. Do you have a management policy in place that promotes the purchasing and/or use of materials or products that consist of recycled and/or reused materials or products? If yes, please describe. No formal “green” purchasing policy is in place at Trent University. However, the different purchasing departments at Trent University do consider environmental impacts of their purchases whenever options are available and feasible.

2. Do you have plans to increase the extent to which materials or products used or sold*

consist of recycled or reused materials or products? If yes, please describe.

Not applicable. * Information regarding materials or products “sold” that consist of recycled or reused materials or products is only required from owner(s) of retail shopping establishments and the owner(s) or operator(s) of large manufacturing establishments. Please attach any additional page(s) as required to answer the above questions.

I hereby certify that the information provided in this Report of Waste Audit is complete and correct.

Signature of authorized official:

Title: Date:

…/5

Page 81: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

Appendix F

Durham Campus - Waste Reduction Work Plan

Page 82: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

Ministry of the Environment Waste Form

Report of a Waste Reduction Work Plan

Industrial, Commercial and Institutional Establishments

As required by O. Reg. 102/94

This report must be prepared 6 months after becoming subject to O. Reg. 102/94 and a copy retained on file for at least five years after it is prepared, and be made available to the ministry upon request. I. GENERAL INFORMATION

Name of Owner and/or Operator of Entity(ies) and Company Name: Trent University - Durham Campus Name of Contact Person: Shelley Strain

Telephone #: 705-748-1011x7157

Email address: [email protected]

Street Address(es) of Entity(ies): Durham Campus: 55 Thornton Road South Municipality: Durham Campus: Oshawa, Ontario

Type of Entity (check one)

Retail Shopping Establishments Hotels and Motels Retail Shopping Complexes Hospitals Office Buildings Educational Institutions X Restaurants Large Manufacturing Establishments Note: O. Reg. 102/94 does not apply to multi-unit residential buildings.

II. DESCRIPTION OF THE ENTITY

Provide a brief overview of the entity(ties): Trent University is an educational institution with approximately 8475 FTE students which satisfies Part X of Ontario Regulation 102/94 & 103/94. O.Reg. 102/94 requires operators of educational institutions with more than 350 full- or part-time students enrolled during the calendar year to conduct an annual waste audit and implement a waste reduction work plan. O.Reg. 103/94 requires that source separation programs be implemented and maintained for fine papers, newsprint, aluminum cans, steel cans, glass beverage containers and corrugated cardboard. Trent University undertook this audit in order to assist them in reducing wastes generated on campus and/or disposed to landfill, while being in compliance with the required Regulations.

…/1

Page 83: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

III. PLANS TO REDUCE, REUSE AND RECYCLE WASTE

For each category of waste described in Part V of “Report of a Waste Audit” (on which this plan is based), explain what your plans are to Reduce, Reuse and Recycle the waste, including: 1) how the waste will be source separated at the establishment, and 2) the programs to reduce, reuse and recycle all source separated waste. Waste Category (as stated in Part V

of your “Report of a Waste Audit”)

Source Separation and 3Rs Program

Mixed Containers (PET, HDPE, LDPE, PP, PS, Aluminum, Steel, Glass, Aseptic)

“Mixed Container 3Rs Program” Reduce: Staff/Students will be encouraged to bring reusable containers food/beveragecontainers for lunch and breaks. Trent Universitywill encourage suppliers to reduce theamountofpolystyreneusedtotransportsupplies.TrentUniversitywillencouragesuppliersto reduce the amount of plastic film andwrappingmaterials used to transport supplies.TrentUniversityaddedwaterbottlerefillingstationsoncampus.Thesestationshelpedtheuniversityreducetheamountofplasticwaterbottlesusedoncampus.Reuse:Staff/Studentswillbeencouragedtoreuseplasticcratesandtoteswhereverpossible.TrentUniversityimplementedareusablemugdiscountprogram.Recycle: Staff/Studentswillbeprovidedwithrecyclingbinsinhighwastegeneratingareasand food service areas formixed containers. Staff/Studentswill be encouraged to placemixed containers in appropriate recycling bins with appropriate signage affixed to thereceptacle.Receptacleswillbeemptiedonaregularbasisbeforetheybecomefullintolargerollawaybinsforcollectionasrequired.

Mixed Papers (Fine Paper, newsprint, boxboard, other recyclable papers)

“Mixed Paper 3Rs Program” Reduce: Staff/Studentswillbeencouragedtoprintonbothsidesofeachpieceofpaperaswellasnotprintwhen it isunnecessary.Staff/Studentswillbeencouragedtotakereadingmaterialshomewiththemaftertheyarefinishedwiththem.Staffandstudentswillbesent,via email, news sources that are available online opposed to purchasing paper copies ofnews. Reuse: Discardedpaperwithprintonlyononesidewillbeusedfornotepads/scrappaper. Staff/Studentswillbeencouragedtoleavenewspaperstheyarefinishedreadingincommonareas for others to read. Staff/Students will be reminded of the existing LCBO/Beer Storereturnprogram. Recycle: Staff/Studentswill be providedwith instructions via email. Receptacleswill beprovided ineachoffice,classroomandhighwastegeneratingareas.Staff/Studentswillbeencouraged to place newsprint, fine paper, boxboard, magazines, molded papers, etc inappropriaterecyclingbinswithappropriatesignageaffixed tothereceptacle. Receptacleswill be emptied on a regular basis before they become full into large roll away bins forcollectionasrequired.

Confidential Papers

“Confidential Paper 3Rs Program” Reduce: None. Reuse: None. Recycle: Staff/Students will be reminded of the existing program. Receptacleswillbeprovidedin each designated area as required. Staff/Students will be encouraged to place allconfidentialpaper in thedesignatedconsoles.Contactorwillemptyconsolesappropriatelyforshreddingandrecyclingasrequired.

Cardboard

“Cardboard 3Rs Program” Reduce: SupplierswillbeencouragedtomakeuseofreusablecontainersfortheshipmentofsuppliestoTrentUniversity. Reuse: Cardboardboxeswillbereusedforshipmentswhenappropriate. Recycle: Staff/Students will be reminded of the existing program. Cleaners will be trained on where to dispose of waste correctly.

Paper Towels No 3Rs Program

Organics No 3Rs Program

Coffee Cups, Coffee pods

No 3Rs Programs

LDPE (#4) films, No 3Rs Programs

Page 84: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

Styrofoam, Plastic Strapping Lab glass and plastics

No 3Rs Programs

Scrap Woods/ Wood Pallets

No 3Rs Program

Scrap Metals No 3Rs Program

Electronic Wastes

No 3Rs Program

Bulbs & Ballasts

“Bulbs & Ballasts 3Rs Program” Reduce: None. Reuse: None. Recycle: Staff/Students will be reminded of the existing program.

Batteries

“Batteries 3Rs Program” Reduce: None. Reuse: None. Recycle: Staff/Students will be reminded of the existing program.

Printer Toners

“Printer Toners 3Rs Program” Reduce: None. Reuse: Staff/Students will be reminded of the existing program. Recycle: Staff/Students will be reminded of the existing program.

Oil & Grease

“Oil & Grease 3Rs Program” Reduce: None. Reuse: None. Recycle: Staff/Students will be reminded of the existing program.

Yard Wastes

“Yard Wastes 3Rs Program” Reduce: None. Reuse: None. Recycle: Staff will be reminded of the existing program. Grass clippings to be left after mowing. Trimmings to be mulched and/or recycled//composted on-site.

Donations/Swap Shop

No 3Rs Program

IV. RESPONSIBILITY FOR IMPLEMENTING THE WASTE REDUCTION WORK PLAN

Identify who is responsible for implementing the Waste Reduction Work Plan at your entity(ies). If more than one person is responsible for implementation, identify each person who is responsible and indicate the part of the Waste Reduction Work Plan that each person is responsible for implementing.

Name of Person Responsibility Telephone # DurhamCampus All diversion programs or will direct to

appropriateperson(s).

.../2

Page 85: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

V. TIMETABLE FOR IMPLEMENTING WASTE REDUCTION WORK PLAN

Provide a timetable indicating when each Source Separation and 3Rs program of the Waste Reduction Work Plan will be implemented.

Source Separation and 3Rs Program

Schedule for Completion

Mixed Containers 3Rs Program currently in place. Continual improvement to signageandadditionalpromotionalcampaignstobeconsidered.

Mixed Papers 3Rs Program currently in place. Continual improvement to signageandadditionalpromotionalcampaignstobeconsidered.

Confidential Papers 3Rs Program currently in place. Continual improvement to signageandadditionalpromotionalcampaignstobeconsidered.

Cardboard 3Rs Program currently in place. Continual improvement to signageandadditionalpromotionalcampaignstobeconsidered.

Bulbs & Ballasts 3Rs Program currently in place. Continual improvement to signageandadditionalpromotionalcampaignstobeconsidered.

Batteries 3Rs Program currently in place. Continual improvement to signageandadditionalpromotionalcampaignstobeconsidered.

Printer Toners 3Rs Program currently in place. Continual improvement to signageandadditionalpromotionalcampaignstobeconsidered.

Oil & Grease 3Rs Program currently in place. Continual improvement to signageandadditionalpromotionalcampaignstobeconsidered.

Yard Wastes 3Rs Program currently in place. Continual improvement to signageandadditionalpromotionalcampaignstobeconsidered.

VI. COMMUNICATION TO STAFF, CUSTOMERS, GUESTS AND VISITORS Explain how the Waste Reduction Work Plan will be communicated to employees, customers, tenants, guests/visitors and students: ExplainhowtheWasteReductionWorkPlanwillbecommunicatedtoemployees,customers,tenants,guests/visitors and students. Sustainability committee will review and develop a work plan to bepostedoncampusforstaffandstudents.Additionalpromotionalcampaignswillalsobeconsideredtotargetspecificaudiencesforspecificprograms.Continuetoimproveeducationalmaterials(hand‐outs,flyers)andsignageacrosscampusasrequired.

…/3

VII. ESTIMATED WASTE PRODUCED BY MATERIAL TYPE AND THE PROJECTED AMOUNT

Material Categories (as stated in

Part III)

Estimated Annual Waste

Produced * (tonnes)

Name of Proposed 3Rs

Program (as stated in Part III)

Projections to Reduce, Reuse or Recycle Waste

(tonnes)

Estimated Annual Amount to be Diverted **

(%)

Reduce Reuse Recycle PET (#1) plastic food and beverage bottles

0.47 Mixed Container 3Rs

Program 0.30 65%

HDPE (#2) Containers

0.05 Mixed Container 3Rs

Program 0.03 65%

Polypropylene (#5) Containers

0.14 Mixed Container 3Rs

Program 0.09 65%

Polystyrene (#6) Containers

0.27 Mixed Container 3Rs

Program 0.18 65%

Glass food and beverage bottles/jars

0.11 Mixed Container 3Rs

Program 0.07 65%

Aluminum food 0.08 Mixed Container 3Rs 0.05 65%

Page 86: Trent University 2017 Hazardous Waste Audit · Therefore, Peterborough Campus and Durham Campus generated approximately 90% and 10% of the total waste audit sample weight respectively.

and beverage cans Program

Steel food and beverage cans

0.03 Mixed Container 3Rs

Program 0.02 65%

Gable Top Containers

0.12 Mixed Container 3Rs

Program 0.08 65%

Aseptic Containers

0.05 Mixed Container 3Rs

Program 0.03 65%

Fine paper 1.57 Mixed Papers &

Confidential Paper 3Rs Program

1.26 80%

Newsprint 0.23 Mixed Papers 3Rs Program 0.17 73%

Boxboard shoe boxes, cereal boxes, etc.

1.07 Mixed Papers 3Rs Program 0.78 73%

Glossy magazines, catalogues, flyers

1.34 Mixed Papers 3Rs Program 0.97 73%

Cardboard 4.92 Cardboard 3Rs Program 4.89 99%

Paper towels 1.06 No 3Rs Program NA

Coffee cups 0.58 No 3Rs Program NA

Coffee pods 0.00 No 3Rs Program NA

Organics / Food Waste

2.45 No 3Rs Program NA

LDPE (#4) plastic film

0.42 No 3Rs Program NA

Styrofoam 0.00 No 3Rs Program NA Plastics Strapping 0.00 No 3Rs Program NA

Lab Glass 0.00 No 3Rs Program NA

Lab Plastics 0.00 No 3Rs Program NA

Scrap Woods 0.00 No 3Rs Program NA

Scrap Metals 0.04 No 3Rs Program NA

Electronic Wastes 0.00 No 3Rs Program NA

Bulbs & Ballasts 0.20 Bulbs & Ballasts 3Rs

Program 0.20 100%

Batteries 0.21 Batteries 3Rs Program 0.20 95% Printer Toners 0.01 Printer Toners 3Rs Program 0.01 100% Oil & Grease 0.16 Oil & Grease 3Rs Program 0.16 100% Yard Wastes unknown Yard Wastes 3Rs Program unknown 100% Donations/Swap-Shop

0.00 No 3Rs Program NA

Other / Non-Recyclable

0.44 No 3Rs Program NA

* Estimated Waste Produced = Waste Diverted (3Rs) + Waste Disposed ** Estimated Waste Diversion Rate = Amount of Waste Diverted (3Rs) ÷ Estimated Waste Produced x 100%

I hereby certify that the information provided in this Waste Reduction Work Plan is complete and correct. Signature of authorized official:

Title: Date:

.../4