Top Banner

of 421

T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

Jun 02, 2018

Download

Documents

Sampath Bulusu
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    1/420

    IN THE COURT OF SESSION, KOZHIKODE DIVISION

    Present : R.Narayana Pisharadi, Speia! "dditi#na! Sessi#ns $%d&e'(arad Cases), K#*hi+#de.

    Tuesday, the 28th day of January, 2014(8th day of Magha, 1935, S.E)

    Sessi#ns Case N#. -/0120

    1) o!"#a$nant % State % &e"resented 'y the

    e"uty Su"er$ntendent of o#$*e,

    r$!e +ran*h .., --/, oh$ode.

    + r$!e o.40&--/2012.

    (r$!e o.43312 of 6ataara o#$*e Stat$on).

    2) a!e of 7**used % 1. 7noo" So. angadharan (71),7ged 3012,Manga#assery -ouse, uthoor 7!so!,

    hendayad, adanthaha, annur.

    2. Mano u!ar : $r!an$ Mano (72),So. angadharan,

    7ged 3012,adu;$# Ma#ayatte -ouse,

    anthaa# .

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    2/420

    5. .. Muha!!ed Shaf$ : Shaf$ (75),So. Mo$du,

    7ged 2=12,ara!'ath -ouse,

    ear ho#$

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    3/420

    12.eoth$ +a'u, So. r$shnan (712)7ged 5112, >r$shna $;as>,ara!'ath -ouse,heru"ara!'a ost, unnoth ara!'a,

    annur $str$*t.

    13.and$nare unh$att$# unhanandan (713)So.annan a$r, 7ged 212,e#othanta;$da, o#a;a##ur ost,unnoth ara!'a an*hayath,annangode.

    14..Mohanan : Mohanan Master (714)So. &a!an, 7ged 5812,oootte -ouse, 6atto#$ ost,

    aatt$#, oh$ode $str$*t.

    15.Sh$'u.. So. o;$ndan (71) 7ged 3012,

    Mara$nta;$de -ouse, att$a!,a*ha""oy$# ost, Muth$yanga,o? res$d$ng at 6annathan 6eett$#,

    ara;oor.

    1.Sree$th. , So. Janu( 71=), 7ged 3012,Meetha#e uray$# -ouse,Muth$yanga ost, att$a!.

    1=..6. &afee : 6aha""a"ada*h$ &afee(718)So. -a!sa, 7ged 312,6a#$ya utha#ath -ouse,a##ur ost, Mahe.

    18. 7s?anth .. : 7*hu (719)So. &aan, 7ged 2012,.. -ouse (hett$ya!andy),o""araa#a! @uarters,a#uthara ost,a##ur, Mahe.

    19... $#shad (720)So. &ah$!, 7ged 2=12,o##a!"ara!'ath -ouse,oroth &oad, 7h$yoor ost,6ataara, oh$ode $str$*t.

    3

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    4/420

    20... Muha!!ed Aasa#u : Aasa#u (721)So. Mo$du, 7ged 2812,ara"ara!'ath Meetha# -ouse,oroth &oad, 7h$yoor ost,

    6ataara, oh$ode $str$*t.

    21.Sanoo". M. (722)So. +a#ar$shnan,

    7ged 2512,arayu##ath$# -ouse,Thatto#$ara, ho!'a#a ost,6ataara, oh$ode $str$*t.

    22... &a$anth : oora""an (725)So. &agha;an, 7ged 3012,

    h$runna!and$y$#,od$yer$ 7!so!,ara#, annur.

    23.&a$th. , So. &aan (72=)7ged 2312,7nantha! -ouse, od$yer$,ara# ost, annur.

    24..M. &a!eesh : uttu (728)So. &a;$, 7ged 2112,>&e!yatha $;as>, 7h$yoor ost,a##ara;ath, 6ataara.

    25... $"$n : uttan : $"$ (729)So. $#ee"an, 7ged 212,unnu!!a# -ouse,otta!a#aunnu,

    7h$yoor ost, 6ataara 6$##age.

    2.&a;eendran M., So. hathu (730)7ged 4=12, adaya!andy -ouse,Era!a#a 6$##age,

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    5/420

    28.Shano : e#an (733) So. unh$ra!an, 7ged 3212, $haey$# -ouse, Muth$yanga,

    att$a! 7!so!, annur $str$*t.

    29. J$esh u!ar, So. angadharan (73) 7ged 2812,

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    6/420

    3.. J$gesh, So. u!aran (750) 7ged 2512, J$$ $;as -ouse,

    Muhaunnu 7!so!,Mudaoh$, annur.

    3=.. hananayan (7=0)So. r$shnan a$r,

    7ged 5312, 7raya#""urath -ouse, ara;oor, oothu"ara!'a.

    3) harge % Cnder se*t$ons 143, 14=, 148, 302 read ?$th149 and 45, 4=1, 118, 201, 212, 120+, 109and 115 .. and se*t$ons 3 and 5 of the

    ED"#os$;e Su'stan*es 7*t, 1908.

    4) #ea of the a**used % ot gu$#ty.

    5) A$nd$ng % 710, 712, 714, 71, 71=, 719, 720, 721, 722,725, 72=, 728, 729, 730, 733, 73, 73=, 739,741, 742, 748, 749, 750 and 7=0 are foundnot gu$#ty of the offen*es *harged aga$nst the!and they are a*u$tted us 235(1) r... 71 $sfound gu$#ty of the offen*es "un$sha'#e us. 143,

    14= and 302 r? 149 ... 72 $s found gu$#ty ofthe offen*es "un$sha'#e us. 143, 14=, 148 and302 r? 149 .. and us 5 of the ED"#os$;eSu'stan*es 7*t, 1908. 73 $s found gu$#ty of theoffen*es "un$sha'#e us. 143, 14=, 148 and 302.. and us. 3 of the ED"#os$;e Su'stan*es

    7*t, 1908. 74, 75, 7 and 7= are found gu$#ty ofthe offen*es "un$sha'#e us. 143, 14=, 148 and302 ... 7 8, 711 and 713 are found gu$#ty ofthe offen*e "un$sha'#e us 120+ r? 302 ...

    718 $s found gu$#ty of the offen*e "un$sha'#e

    us. 302 r? 109 ... 731 $s found gu$#ty of theoffen*e "un$sha'#e us. 201 ...

    ) Senten*e or order % (1) 71 $s senten*ed to $!"r$son!ent for #$fe and

    to "ay a f$ne of &s.50000/. ..&.. for a "er$od

    of one year for the offen*e "un$sha'#e us. 302

    r? 149 ... -e $s a#so senten*ed to undergo

    6

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    7/420

    &.. for a "er$od of s$D !onths for the offen*e

    "un$sha'#e us. 143 .. and &.. for a "er$od of

    one year for the offen*e "un$sha'#e us 14=

    ...

    (2) 72 $s senten*ed to $!"r$son!ent for #$fe and

    to "ay a f$ne of &s.50000/. ..&.. for a "er$od

    of one year for the offen*e "un$sha'#e us. 302

    r?. 149 ... -e $s a#so senten*ed to undergo

    &. for a "er$od of s$D !onths for the offen*e

    "un$sha'#e us. 143 .. and &.. for a "er$od

    of one year for the offen*e "un$sha'#e us. 14=

    .. and &.. for a "er$od of t?o years for the

    offen*e "un$sha'#e us. 148 ... -e $s a#so

    senten*ed to undergo &.. for a "er$od of f$;e

    years and to "ay a f$ne of &s.10000 / and

    ..&.. for a "er$od of s$D !onths for the offen*e

    "un$sha'#e us. 5 of the ED"#os$;e Su'stan*es

    7*t, 1908.

    (3) 73 $s senten*ed to $!"r$son!ent for #$fe and

    to "ay a f$ne of &s.50000/. ..&.. for a "er$od

    of one year for the offen*e "un$sha'#e us. 302

    ... -e $s a#so senten*ed to undergo &.. for a

    "er$od of s$D !onths for the offen*e "un$sha'#e

    us. 143 .. and &.. for a "er$od of one year

    for the offen*e "un$sha'#e us.14= .. and&.. for a "er$od of t?o years for the offen*e

    "un$sha'#e us. 148 ... -e $s a#so senten*ed

    to undergo &.. for a "er$od of ten years and to

    "ay a f$ne of &s.20000/ and ..&.. for a "er$od

    of one year for the offen*e "un$sha'#e us. 3 of

    the ED"#os$;e Su'stan*es 7*t, 1908.

    7

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    8/420

    (4) 74, 75, 7 and 7= are senten*ed to

    $!"r$son!ent for #$fe and to "ay a f$ne of

    &s.50000/ ea*h. ..&.. for a "er$od of one

    year ea*h for the offen*e "un$sha'#e uS 302

    ... Ea*h of the! $s a#so senten*ed to

    undergo &.. for a "er$od of s$D !onths for the

    offen*e "un$sha'#e us. 143 .. and &.. for a

    "er$od of one year for the offen*e "un$sha'#e

    us. 14= .. and &.. for a "er$od of t?o years

    for the offen*e "un$sha'#e us. 148 ...

    (5) 78, 711 and 713 are senten*ed to

    $!"r$son!ent for #$fe and to "ay a f$ne of

    &s.100000/ ea*h. ..&.. for a "er$od of t?o

    years ea*h for the offen*e "un$sha'#e us. 120+

    r?. 302 ...

    () 718 $s senten*ed to $!"r$son!ent for #$fe

    and to "ay a f$ne of &s.100000/. ..&.. for a

    "er$od of t?o years for the offen*e "un$sha'#e

    us. 302 r? 109 ...

    (=) 731 $s senten*ed to undergo &.. for a "er$od

    of three years and to "ay a f$ne of &s.20000/.

    ..&.. for a "er$od of s$D !onths for the offen*e

    "un$sha'#e us. 201 ... -e ?as under

    detent$on dur$ng the "er$od fro! 1.05.2012 to23.08.2012. Th$s "er$od sha## 'e set off aga$nst

    the su'stant$;e senten*e of $!"r$son!ent

    a?arded to h$!.

    (8) The senten*e of #$fe $!"r$son!ent a?arded

    to the a**used $s for the ?ho#e of the re!a$n$ng

    8

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    9/420

    #$fe of the! su'e*t to the re!$ss$on granted 'y

    the a""ro"r$ate o;ern!ent under se*t$on 432

    r#.., ?h$*h, $n turn, $s su'e*t to the "ro;$s$on

    *onta$ned $n se*t$on 4337 r#...

    (9) The su'stant$;e senten*es of $!"r$son!ent

    a?arded sha## run *on*urrent#y.

    (10) f the f$ne a!ount $s rea#$sed, &s.300000/

    sha## 'e "a$d to &e!a (5), the ?$fe of the

    de*eased and &s.200000/ sha## 'e "a$d to

    7'h$nand (13), the son of the de*eased as

    *o!"ensat$on us. 35= r#...

    (11) The *harge aga$nst 79, ?ho $s no !ore,

    stands a'ated.

    =) o. of r$!e and

    na!e of "o#$*e stat$on % r$!e o.+40&--2012,+, oh$ode. (r$!e o. 4332012 of6ataara o#$*e Stat$on).

    8) a!e of the *o!!$tt$ng

    Mag$strate % Sr$. M. Suha$',

    Jud$*$a# A$rst #ass Mag$strate,

    6ataara.

    9) rose*ut$on *ondu*ted 'y % Sr$. ..Sreedharan, S"e*$a# u'#$* rose*utorand Sr$. .u!aranutty, 7sso*$ate u'#$*rose*utor.

    10) 7**used defended 'y % 71 to 73 'y 7d;. Sr$. +. &a!an $##a$, 74 and75 'y 7d;. Sr$. M.7soan, 7d;. Sr$. .M.Sath$sharayanan, 7 and 7= 'y 7d;. Sr$. .6. -ar$,

    7d;. Sr$. T.S. 7ay, 78 and 720 to 722 'y 7d;.Sr$. .M. &a!das, 79 'y 7d;. Sr$..Sreedharan a$r, 710 'y 7d;. Sr$. ..a!odharan a!'$ar, 711 and 712 'y 7d;.Sr$. .6$s?an, 713 'y 7d;. Sr$. .o"a#ar$shna uru", 7d;. Sr$. .. Suu!aran

    9

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    10/420

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    11/420

    ra"$d s"read and gro?th ?$th r$*h re?ards and d$;$dends to *r$!$na#s. The a#ar!$ng rate

    of so*$a# res"e*ta'$#$ty su*h e#$te gangster$s! ga$n$ng day 'y day $n the !$dst of "eo"#e

    ?ho *hose and had g$;en unto the!se#;es the r$ght to e#e*t the$r ru#ers, !ost#y gu$ded

    'y !$sd$re*ted a##eg$an*e to "arty "o#$t$*s and se#f or$ented "rof$t !a$ng endea;ours

    see! to "ro;$de the reu$red ne*tar for $ts !an$fo#d and !yr$ad ?ays of ;ent$#at$on ?$th

    $!"un$ty. Though $t $s an $rony, yet a**e"ted truth $s that the Fho!e ru#eG ?e *ou#d

    a*h$e;e 'y Gnon/;$o#en*eG has 'e*o!e the root *ause for generat$ng Gho!$*$da#G *u#ture

    of "o#$t$*a# go;ernan*e effe*t$;e#y sh$e#ded 'y un"r$n*$"#ed !ass sy!"ath$es and h$gh#y

    "rof$t/or$ented se#f$sh des$gns of uns*ru"u#ous G"eo"#eG ?ho ha;e !any fa*eted $!ages

    to "resent the!se#;es at t$!es to the eDtent of the$r de$f$*at$on.GG (See &a! Cdgar S$ngh

    6s State of +$har % (2004) 10 S 443).

    4. 7ngu$sh and anD$ety eD"ressed as a'o;e 'y the 7"eD ourt of the *ountry

    a de*ade ago see! to ha;e not yet y$e#ded any fru$tfu# resu#t. ro!ot$on of "o#$t$*a#

    ;$o#en*e *ont$nues.

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    12/420

    5. Th$s *ase $s 'ased on the f$na# re"ort f$#ed 'y the e"uty Su"er$ntendent

    of o#$*e, r$!e +ran*h .., --/, oh$ode $n r$!e o.43312 of 6ataara

    "o#$*e stat$on ?h$*h ?as re/reg$stered as + r$!e o.40&--/2012.

    The rose*ut$on ase

    . The *ase re#ates to the !urder of Sr$. T..handraseharan, ?ho ?as the

    #eader of &e;o#ut$onary MarD$st arty. The syno"s$s of the "rose*ut$on *ase $s that on

    the n$ght of 04.05.2012, at a "u'#$* road at the "#a*e 6a##$ad, a**used 1 to = ha*ed

    the ;$*t$! to death, str$$ng h$! ?$th s?ords and that the th$rd a**used *aused

    eD"#os$on ?$th a *ountry !ade 'o!' to "re;ent ?$tnesses fro! a""roa*h$ng the s*ene

    of the $n*$dent and that a *r$!$na# *ons"$ra*y had 'een hat*hed 'y a**used 8 to 14 to

    *o!!$t su*h !urder and that the other a**used $n the *ase had $n one ?ay or other

    ass$sted eDe*ut$ng the !urder and #ater $n s*reen$ng the a**used or o'#$terat$ng the

    e;$den*e of the *r$!e.

    =. The a##egat$ons aga$nst the a**used $n the f$na# re"ort *an 'e des*r$'ed a

    #$tt#e !ore $n deta$# as fo##o?s% T..handraseharan ?as an a*t$;e !e!'er of the

    o!!un$st arty of nd$a (MarD$st). -e ?as a #o*a# #eader of the .. (M). 7#ong ?$th

    so!e others, he #eft .. (M) and for!ed a ne? "arty *a##ed >&e;o#ut$onary MarD$st

    arty> (&.M.). The ne? "o#$t$*a# "arty ra$sed strong *ha##enge to the .. (M) $n

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    13/420

    e#e*t$on. efeat of the .. (M) *and$date at the 6ataara *onst$tuen*y $n the

    Bo Sa'ha e#e*t$on, "resu!a'#y due to the "resen*e of T..handraseharan as a

    *and$date $n the e#e*t$on, $ntens$;e#y $nf#a!ed the an$!os$ty and r$;a#ry 'et?een

    the t?o "o#$t$*a# "art$es. 7 *r$!$na# *ons"$ra*y ?as then hat*hed to !urder

    T..handraseharan. ur$ng the !onths of Se"te!'er and

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    14/420

    8. 4, the Su' ns"e*tor of 6ataara "o#$*e stat$on, after *ondu*t$ng #a?

    and order duty, rea*hed the "o#$*e stat$on at 22.25 hours on 04.05.2012. The Sen$or

    $;$# o#$*e

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    15/420

    +ran*h. 7 S"e*$a# n;est$gat$on Tea! ?as *onst$tuted.

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    16/420

    14. Th$s *ourt fra!ed *harge aga$nst the re!a$n$ng =2 a**used under

    se*t$ons 143, 14=, 148, 302 read ?$th 149 .. and 45, 4=1, 115 ,118, 201, 212, 120+

    and 109 .. and a#so under se*t$ons 3 and 5 of the ED"#os$;e Su'stan*es 7*t, 1908.

    7## the =2 a**used "#eaded not gu$#ty.

    15. 7s "er the order dated 21.01.2013 $n &M7 o. 4522013 $n r#. &..

    o. 1322013 and $n &M7 o. 4542013 $n r#.&.. o.1332013 and $n &M7 o.

    50=2013 $n r#.&.. o. 1452013 and $n &M7 o. 5082013 $n r#.&.. o. 142013,

    the -on>'#e -$gh ourt stayed a## further "ro*eed$ngs $n the *ase aga$nst a**used 53,

    58, 0, 2 to 9 and =1 to =4.

    1. 7s the tr$a# aga$nst the re!a$n$ng a**used ?as not stayed 'y the -onG'#e

    -$gh ourt and as there ?as a d$re*t$on 'y the -onG'#e -$gh ourt to d$s"ose of the

    *ase on or 'efore 31.=.2013, th$s *ourt "ro*eeded ?$th the tr$a# aga$nst the re!a$n$ng 5=

    a**used. (The t$!e f$Ded for d$s"os$ng the *ase ?as su'seuent#y eDtended 'y the

    -onG'#e -$gh ourt).

    1=. There ?ere 284 ?$tnesses *$ted 'y the "rose*ut$on for eDa!$nat$on.

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    17/420

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    18/420

    (1) -as the "rose*ut$on "ro;ed that a**used 1 to = ?ere !e!'ers of an

    un#a?fu# asse!'#y, the *o!!on o'e*t of ?h$*h ?as to *o!!$t !urder of

    T..handraseharanI

    (2) -as the "rose*ut$on "ro;ed that $n "rose*ut$on of the *o!!on o'e*t of

    the un#a?fu# asse!'#y of ?h$*h a**used 1 to = ?ere !e!'ers, a**used 3 to =, ?$th the

    $ntent$on of *aus$ng the death of T..handraseharan, stru* h$! ?$th s?ords on h$s

    head and other "arts of h$s 'ody and *aused h$! gr$e;ous $nur$es ?h$*h resu#ted $n h$s

    death and thus *o!!$tted h$s !urder I

    (3) -as the "rose*ut$on "ro;ed that a**used 1 to 5 and = to 14 had hat*hed

    any *ons"$ra*y to !urder T..handraseharan I

    (4) -as the "rose*ut$on "ro;ed that the th$rd a**used un#a?fu##y and

    !a#$*$ous#y *aused eD"#os$on 'y a *ountry !ade 'o!', an eD"#os$;e su'stan*e, ?h$*h

    ?as of a nature #$e#y to endanger #$fe and *ause ser$ous $nury to "ro"erty I

    (5) -as the "rose*ut$on "ro;ed that the se*ond a**used had $n h$s

    "ossess$on or under h$s *ontro#, eD"#os$;e su'stan*e, under su*h *$r*u!stan*es as to

    g$;e a reasona'#e sus"$*$on that he had $t $n h$s "ossess$on or under h$s *ontro# not for a

    #a?fu# o'e*t I

    () -as the "rose*ut$on "ro;ed that on 04.05.2012, 'et?een 4 ".! and

    10 ".!, ?$thout #a?fu# author$ty and d$shonest#y and fraudu#ent#y, the f$rst a**used

    *aused a nu!'er "#ate ha;$ng fae reg$strat$on nu!'er B/187594 to 'e aff$Ded on

    the nno;a ar B/588144 and thus *o!!$tted forgery and that he used the aforesa$d

    forged nu!'er "#ate as genu$ne I

    (=) -as the "rose*ut$on "ro;ed that at so!e t$!e after 10.15 ".! on

    04.05.2012, the th$rd a**used entrusted a**used no.31 f$;e '#ood/sta$ned s?ords ?h$*h

    18

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    19/420

    ?ere used 'y h$! and a**used 4 to = to *ause the death of T..handraseharan and

    thus *aused e;$den*e of *o!!$tt$ng the offen*e of !urder to d$sa""earI

    (8) -as the "rose*ut$on "ro;ed that a**used 8 to 14 a'etted the !urder of

    T..handraseharan I

    (9) -as the "rose*ut$on "ro;ed that a**used no.8, at so!e t$!e 'et?een

    04.05.2012 and 0=.05.2012, destroyed the !o'$#e "hone ha;$ng the SM *ard nu!'er

    9=4=1=04=1 a#ong?$th that SM *ard ?h$*h ?as used for fa*$#$tat$ng the !urder of

    T..handraseharan and there'y *aused e;$den*e of the offen*e of !urder to

    d$sa""ear ?$th the $ntent$on of s*reen$ng h$!se#f and a**used 1 to = fro! #ega#

    "un$sh!ent I

    (10) -as the "rose*ut$on "ro;ed that a**used 1 and 1=, on 2=.04.2012,

    !ade atte!"t to f$nd out the ?herea'outs of T..handraseharan and to $dent$fy h$!

    for the "ur"ose of *aus$ng h$s death I

    (11) -as the "rose*ut$on "ro;ed that a**used no.18, at a'out 12 noon on

    25.04.2012, at the "re!$ses of Mahe +r$dge, "ut h$s s$gnature $n the *heue ha;$ng the

    nu!'er 12222 $ssued fro! od$yer$ o/o"erat$;e +an to a**ount no. 919 !a$nta$ned

    'y a**used no. 25 $n that 'an and thus *o!!$tted forgery and fraudu#ent#y and

    d$shonest#y used the aforesa$d *heue as a genu$ne do*u!ent I

    (12) -as the "rose*ut$on "ro;ed that a**used no.18, 'et?een 25.04.2012

    and 04.05.2012, entrusted the *ar B/58 8144 ?h$*h ?as o'ta$ned 'y h$! on rent to

    the f$rst a**used and there'y a'etted *o!!$ss$on of the offen*e of !urderI

    (13) -as the "rose*ut$on "ro;ed that a**used no.19, 'et?een 25.04.2012

    and 04.05.2012, ?$thout any #a?fu# author$ty, d$shonest#y and fraudu#ent#y, !ade fae

    19

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    20/420

    nu!'er "#ate B/187 594 and at the $nstan*e of the f$rst a**used aff$Ded $t on the

    nno;a *ar B/58 8144 and there'y *o!!$tted forgeryI

    (14) -as the "rose*ut$on "ro;ed that a**used no.19, 'et?een 25.04.2012

    and 04.05.2012, d$shonest#y and fraudu#ent#y, !ade and aff$Ded the st$*er >Masha 7##ah>

    $n 7ra'$* #anguage on the nno;a *ar B/58 8144 ?$th the $ntent$on to fa*$#$tate the use

    of the aforesa$d *ar 'y a**used 1 to = $n *o!!$tt$ng the !urder of T..handraseharan

    and there'y a'etted *o!!$ss$on of the offen*e of !urder I

    (15) -as the "rose*ut$on "ro;ed that a**used no.20, 'et?een 20.04.2012

    and 04.05.2012, o'ta$ned four SM *ards through 19 $ssar and 1=0 Ja'$r and

    entrusted the! to the th$rd a**used ?$th the $ntent$on of a$d$ng and fa*$#$tat$ng the

    !urder of T..handraseharan and thus a'etted the !urder of T..handraseharanI

    (1) -as the "rose*ut$on "ro;ed that a**used no.21, 'et?een 25.04.2012

    and 04.05.2012, o'ta$ned and entrusted s?ords to the th$rd a**used ?$th the $ntent$on

    of a$d$ng and fa*$#$tat$ng the !urder of T..handraseharan and the aforesa$d s?ords

    ?ere used for *o!!$tt$ng the !urder of T..handraseharan and thus he a'etted the

    !urder of T..handraseharan I

    (1=) -as the "rose*ut$on "ro;ed that a**used no.22, on 25.04.2012 and

    2.04.2012, tra;e##ed $n the nno;a ar B/58 8144 a#ong ?$th a**used 1 to 5 and = $n

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    21/420

    (19) -as the "rose*ut$on "ro;ed that a**used no.2=, 'et?een 24.04.2012

    and 04.05.2012, o'ta$ned and entrusted s?ords to the th$rd a**used ?$th the $ntent$on of

    a$d$ng and fa*$#$tat$ng the !urder of T..handraseharan and thus a'etted the offen*e

    of !urderI

    (20) -as the "rose*ut$on "ro;ed that a**used no.2=, on 02.05.2012 and

    03.05.2012, a#ong ?$th a**used 24 and 28 and a#so ?$th the ass$stan*e of a**used

    no.30, found out T..handraseharan $n

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    22/420

    04.05.2012 or thereafter, "ut the '#ood/sta$ned s?ords, ?h$*h ?ere used for *o!!$tt$ng

    the !urder of T..handraseharan and ?h$*h ?ere entrusted to h$! 'y the th$rd

    a**used, $nto a ?e## 'eh$nd 6asude;a Ser;$*e Stat$on $n ho#$, ?$th the no?#edge that

    they had 'een used to *o!!$t the !urder of T..handraseharan and *aused e;$den*e

    of the *o!!$ss$on of the offen*e of !urder to d$sa""ear ?$th the $ntent$on of s*reen$ng

    the offenders fro! #ega# "un$sh!ent I

    (2) -as the "rose*ut$on "ro;ed that a**used no.31,on 04.05.2012 at a'out

    11.30 ".!, too a**used no., ?ho ?as $nured ?h$#e *o!!$tt$ng the a*t of !urder$ng

    T..handraseharan, to .M.. -os"$ta# $n ho#$ for treat!ent and that he ga;e fa#se

    $nfor!at$on $n the hos"$ta# regard$ng the na!e of a**used no. and the *ause of the

    $nury susta$ned 'y h$! and *aused e;$den*e of the *o!!$ss$on of the offen*e of !urder

    to d$sa""ear and a#so har'oured a**used no.I

    (2=) -as the "rose*ut$on "ro;ed that a**used no.33, at a'out 11.30 ".! on

    04.05.2012, too a**used no.4 to Byndas Bodge $n oothu"ara!'a, ?$th the no?#edge

    that a**used no.4 ?as one of the "ersons ?ho *o!!$tted !urder of

    T..handraseharan and that he too a roo! $n that Bodge $n h$s na!e and a##o?ed

    a**used no.4 to res$de $n that roo! and thus har'oured*on*ea#ed h$! ?$th the $ntent$on

    of s*reen$ng h$! fro! #ega# "un$sh!entI

    (28) -as the "rose*ut$on "ro;ed that a**used no.3, on or after the n$ght of

    04.05.2012, 'urnt the '#ood/sta$ned *#othes ?h$*h ?ere ?orn 'y a**used no. at the

    t$!e of *o!!$tt$ng the !urder of T..handraseharan and *aused e;$den*e of

    *o!!$ss$on of the offen*e of !urder to d$sa""earI

    (29) -as the "rose*ut$on "ro;ed that a**used no.3=, on or after the n$ght of

    22

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    23/420

    04.05.2012, 'urnt the '#ood/sta$ned f#oor !at ?h$*h ?as re!o;ed fro! the nno;a ar

    B/58 8144 ?h$*h ?as used 'y a**used 1 to = for fa*$#$tat$ng the !urder of

    T..handraseharan and *aused e;$den*e of *o!!$ss$on of the offen*e of !urder to

    d$sa""earI

    (30) -as the "rose*ut$on "ro;ed that a**used no.3= ,on or after the n$ght of

    04.05.2012, ?$th the no?#edge that the f$rst a**used ?as one of the "ersons ?ho

    *o!!$tted the !urder of T..handraseharan, ass$sted the f$rst a**used to

    *on*ea#a's*ond ?$th the $ntent$on of s*reen$ng the f$rst a**used fro! #ega#

    "un$sh!ent I

    (31) -as the "rose*ut$on "ro;ed that a**used no.3=, on or after the n$ght of

    04.05.2012, ?$th the no?#edge that a**used no.35 had *aused e;$den*e of the !urder

    of T..handraseharan to d$sa""ear 'y a'andon$ng the nno;a ar B/58 8144 at

    the "#a*e unath$#!uu $n ho#$, ass$sted a**used no.35 to a's*ond*on*ea# I

    (32) -as the "rose*ut$on "ro;ed that a**used no.39, on or after the n$ght of

    04.05.2012, too a**used no. to the Tha#assery 7rea o!!$ttee

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    24/420

    "ersons ?ho had *o!!$tted !urder of T..handraseharan and ?$th the $ntent$on of

    s*reen$ng the! fro! #ega# "un$sh!ent I

    (34) -as the "rose*ut$on "ro;ed that a**used 42 and =0, on or after the

    n$ght of 04.05.2012, har'oured*on*ea#ed a**used 1 to 3 and 5 $n the uthu"ara!'a

    7rea o!!$ttee

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    25/420

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    26/420

    frag!ents "$er*ed the dura !ater and fronta# #o'es of 'ra$n. Aro! the u""er !arg$n of

    the 'ony defe*t a f$ssured fra*ture *! #ong eDtended trans;erse#y a#ong the fronta#

    'one to the r$ght s$de of head, another f$ssured fra*ture 8 *! #ong eDtended to the ;au#t

    of su##. The 'a* end of the su## defe*t on the #eft s$de of head eDtended a#ong the

    !asto$d "ro*ess *utt$ng $t shar"#y trans;erse#y u" to the #eft s$de of 'a* of head.

    Shar"#y *ut 'one frag!ents ?ere found a;u#sed on the #eft s$de of 'a* of head.

    7 f$ssured fra*ture *! #ong eDtended fro! the 'ony defe*t on the #eft s$de of head to

    #eft "ar$eta# "ro!$nen*e. There ?as a shar" *ut on the #eft s$de of 'a* of su##

    trans;erse#y "#a*ed 10 *! #ong $n;o#;$ng 'oth ta'#es of su## under#y$ng the eDterna#

    $nury 2 (a). 7 shar"#y *ut a;u#sed 'one seg!ent trans;erse#y "#a*ed 9D3 *! seen on the

    'a* of head $n;o#;$ng the o**$"$ta# 'one underneath $nury no.1, through ?h$*h $n*$sed

    dura!ater and *ut 'ra$n ?as "rotrud$ng. The #eft s$de and !$d#$ne of anter$or *ran$a#

    fossa ?as fra*tured and frag!ented ?$th "er$ or'$ta# fat of #eft s$de "rotrud$ng $nto the

    *ran$a# *a;$ty. The #eft s$de of !$dd#e *ran$a# fossa ?as found shattered ?$th a shar" *ut

    a#ong the ent$re #ength of #eft "etrous te!"ora# 'one. The #eft !asto$d "ro*ess ?as

    shar"#y *ut ?$th fra*tures eDtend$ng to the #eft s$de of "oster$or *ran$a# fossa. The #eft

    fronta# #o'e of the 'ra$n sho?ed an $n*$sed *ut 9 *! $n;o#;$ng the ent$re th$*ness (5*!)

    se"arat$ng the ent$re fronta# #o'e fro! the *ere'ra# he!$s"here ?$th the *ut "ass$ng

    through the anter$or horn of #eft #atera# ;entr$*#e. Th$n su' ara*hno$d hae!orrhage seen

    o;er 'oth the *ere'ra# he!$s"here. The un*t$on of !$d 'ra$n and "ons ?as #a*erated

    ?$th "art$a# se"arat$on of u""er 'ra$n ste!. The #eft 'as$ fronta#, 'as$ te!"ora# reg$on

    and outer as"e*t of #eft fronta# #o'e ?as #a*erated and *ontused. The #eft o**$"$ta#

    #o'e ?as found *ut shar"#y underneath the a;u#sed o**$"$ta# 'one ?$th *ontus$on

    of #eft 'as$ o**$"$ta# reg$on. The *ut on the #eft *ere'ra# fronta# #o'e ?as d$re*ted

    26

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    27/420

    !ed$a##y and 'a*?ards >>.

    28. 13 has g$;en e;$den*e that $nur$es 1 to 3 and 5 to = resu#t$ng $n $nury

    o.14 had #ed to the death of the ;$*t$!. -e has de"osed that these $nur$es are

    suff$*$ent $n the ord$nary *ourse to *ause death.

    29.There $s no reason to f$nd that the o"$n$on of 13 $s $nherent#y

    defe*t$;e. The do*tor ?ho eDa!$ned the de*eased and *ondu*ted the "ost!orte! $s the

    on#y *o!"etent "erson to o"$ne the nature of the $nur$es and *ause of death. t $s on#y

    $n a *ase, ?here the o"$n$on $s $nherent#y defe*t$;e, the *ourt ?$## d$s*ard h$s e;$den*e

    (Sahe'rao Mohan +erad 6s. State % 2011 r$.B.J 215= % (2011) 4 S 249). n the

    a'sen*e of any *on;$n*$ng e;$den*e that the do*tor ho#d$ng "ost !orte! eDa!$nat$on

    has de#$'erate#y g$;en a ?rong re"ort, h$s e;$den*e $s not #$a'#e to 'e d$s*arded

    (Tan;$'en anau!ar $;et$a 6s State of uarat % 7..& 199= S 2193 ). There $s no

    o'#$gat$on on the do*tor to des*r$'e the or$g$n or *ause of the $nur$es $n the "ost!orte!

    re"ort as he stated $n h$s de"os$t$on $n the *ourt ( State of una' 6s Jugra S$ngh % 7..&

    2002 S 1083 %2002 r$. B. J. 1503).

    30.The e;$den*e of 13 and EDt.1=9 "ost!orte! *ert$f$*ate $ssued 'y

    h$! esta'#$sh 'eyond dou't that T..handraseharan had a ho!$*$da# death.

    eath of T..handraseharan ef$n$te ase of Murder

    31. The defen*e has not d$s"uted the fa*t that the a*t of *aus$ng the death of

    T..handraseharan, ?hoe;er has done $t, a!ounts to !urder "un$sha'#e under

    se*t$on 302 of the nd$an ena# ode. t $s not an a*t of a #esser degree of *aus$ng death

    of a "erson. The $nur$es noted $n the "ost!orte! *ert$f$*ate on the head and the fa*e of

    27

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    28/420

    the ;$*t$! $nd$*ate that $t ?as an a*t of $ntent$ona##y *aus$ng the death of a "erson. There

    $s no need to ana#yse the other e;$den*e $n the *ase to *o!e to a def$n$te *on*#us$on

    that the a*t of *aus$ng death of T..handraseharan ?as !urder "un$sha'#e under

    se*t$on 302 of the nd$an ena# ode.

    32. 7**ord$ng to the "rose*ut$on, a**used 1 to = had rea*hed the s*ene of

    the $n*$dent $n a *ar dr$;en 'y the f$rst a**used. t $s a##eged that T.. handraseharan

    ?as *o!$ng fro! the o""os$te d$re*t$on r$d$ng a !otor *y*#e and that the f$rst a**used

    ra!!ed the *ar on to the !otor *y*#e and ?hen T.. handraseharan fe## do?n on the

    road, a**used 2 to = u!"ed out of the *ar and a**used 3 to = atta*ed h$! ?$th

    s?ords and ha*ed h$! to death. t $s a#so a##eged that the se*ond a**used ?as

    *arry$ng a *ountry !ade 'o!' ?$th h$! and that the th$rd a**used got $t fro! h$! and

    *aused an eD"#os$on 'y thro?$ng $t on the road to terr$fy the "ersons ?ho rea*hed there.

    33. 1 to 3 are the eye/?$tnesses eDa!$ned 'y the "rose*ut$on to

    "ro;e the !urder. They ha;e g$;en e;$den*e regard$ng the h$deous $n*$dent *#a$!ed to

    ha;e seen 'y the!.

    Test$!ony of raseed (1)

    34. 7 su!!ary of the e;$den*e of 1 raseed ($n eDa!$nat$on/$n/*h$ef)

    regard$ng the $n*$dent *an 'e stated as fo##o?s% The $n*$dent too "#a*e at a'out 22.15

    hours on 04.05.2012 on the s$de of a$natt$/utt$ad$ road at the "#a*e 6a##$ad. The

    ann$;ersary of 6a##$ad +rothers #u' ?as s*hedu#ed to 'e he#d on 05.05.2012. 7t

    a'out 20.00 hours on 04.05.2012, 1 'egan to de*orate the "re!$ses of the *#u' and

    the #o*a# area. &a!a*handran (2), &a!esan (2) and Maneesh u!ar (3)

    ?ere ?$th h$!. 7t a'out 22.00 hours, they rea*hed 6ar$saun$ Jun*t$on to t$e a 'anner

    28

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    29/420

    there. 1 then ?anted to go ho!e and he "ro*eeded to ?a# to?ards h$s house $n the

    #o*a#$ty. hen he rea*hed so!e d$stan*e, a #$ght *o#oured nno;a ar *a!e fro!

    'eh$nd h$!, too a turn there and "ro*eeded to?ards

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    30/420

    ee".

    35. 1 has de"osed that there ?as #$ght at the s*ene of the $n*$dent fro!

    the Beague -ouse and the ..S.7 off$*e 'u$#d$ng. -e has a#so stated that the eng$ne

    and the #$ghts of the nno;a *ar had not 'een "ut off. 1 ?ou#d say that there ?as

    a#so 'r$ght !oon #$ght at the t$!e of the $n*$dent.

    3. 1 $dent$f$ed a**used 1 to = $n the *ourt as the "ersons ?ho *a!e $n

    the nno;a *ar and ha*ed the ;$*t$! ?$th s?ords. -e s"e*$f$*a##y $dent$f$ed the a**used

    7noo" (71) as the "erson ?ho ?as dr$;$ng the *ar and the a**used Mano u!ar (72)

    as the "erson ?ho ?as ho#d$ng the round o'e*t $n h$s hand. -e ?ou#d say that the

    other f$;e "ersons $dent$f$ed 'y h$! $n the *ourt ?ere the "ersons seen 'y h$! as str$$ng

    the ;$*t$! ?$th s?ords. 1 has a#so stated that the nu!'er seen on the nno;a *ar

    ?as B/187 594. 1 has a#so de"osed that $n the $dent$f$*at$on "arade he#d on

    11.0.2012, 14.0.2012 and 12.0=.2012, he had $dent$f$ed the a**used T.. &aeesh

    (74), 7noo" (71) and Sh$no (7=). 1 has further stated that on 23.05.2012 he had

    "o$nted out S$$th (7) to the "o#$*e at the *a!" off$*e of the S"e*$a# n;est$gat$on Tea!

    (S..T). -e ?ou#d a#so say that on 19.0.2012, at the off$*e of the S..T , he had "o$nted

    out Muha!!ed Shaf$ (75), Mano u!ar (72) and Sun$ (73) to the "o#$*e. 1

    $dent$f$ed the nno;a *ar B/58 8144 "ared $n the *o!"ound of the *ourt as the *ar

    $n;o#;ed $n the $n*$dent.

    3=. 1 has a#so g$;en e;$den*e regard$ng the se$ure of the nno;a *ar

    a##eged to ha;e 'een found a'andoned at the "#a*e unath$#!uu. -$s e;$den*e $n th$s

    regard *an 'e su!!ar$ed as fo##o?s%

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    31/420

    near ho#$. The y.S., 6ataara ?as then "resent there. 7#ong?$th &a!a*handran,

    1 a""roa*hed the y.S. and to#d h$! that they *ou#d $dent$fy the *ar $n;o#;ed $n the

    $n*$dent. The y.S. then too the! $n h$s ;eh$*#e to the "#a*e unath$#!uu near

    ho#$. They sa? there the *ar ?h$*h ?as seen 'y the! dur$ng the $n*$dent on the

    "re;$ous day. The *o#our of the *ar ?as the sa!e. There ?as ?r$t$ng $n 7ra'$* on the

    front and the rear s$des of the *ar. The *ar found the! there had the reg$strat$on

    nu!'er B/58 8144. 7 "erson 'rought there the s"are ey of the *ar. The *ar ?as

    o"ened 'y us$ng that ey. 1 sa? eD"erts eDa!$n$ng the *ar and *o##e*t$ng '#ood/

    sta$ns and ha$rs fro! $t. The "o#$*e se$ed the *ar and the art$*#es found $ns$de the *ar

    as "er EDt.1 !ahaar. 1 $dent$f$ed h$s s$gnature $n EDt.1 !ahaar. 1 a#so

    $dent$f$ed M

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    32/420

    the road. Then raseed (1) ?a#ed to?ards h$s house stat$ng that he ?ou#d go

    ho!e and *o!e 'a*. 7t that t$!e, a #$ght *o#oured nno;a *ar *a!e fro!

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    33/420

    41. 2 has $dent$f$ed the a**used Mano u!ar (72), S$$th (7),

    Muha!!ed Shaf$ (75), T.. &aeesh (74) and Sh$no (7=) $n the *ourt as the assa$#ants.

    -e $dent$f$ed 7noo" (71) $n the *ourt as the dr$;er of the nno;a *ar. 2 $dent$f$ed the

    f$;e s?ords (M

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    34/420

    7 su!!ary of h$s e;$den*e $n eDa!$nat$on/$n/*h$ef *an 'e stated as fo##o?s% The

    $n*$dent too "#a*e at a'out 22.15 hours on 04.05.2012 at the eastern s$de of a$natt$/

    utt$ad$ road $n 6a##$ad To?n. The ann$;ersary of 6a##$ad +rothers #u' ?as

    s*hedu#ed to 'e he#d on 05.05.2012 $n 6a##$ad 6ar$saun$ C. S*hoo#.

    &a!a*handran (2) and S$;ara!an (182) had to#d 3 to de*orate the s*hoo#

    and $ts "re!$ses. The de*orat$on ?or 'egan after 20.00 hours on 04.05.2012.

    raseed (1), &a!esan (2), S$;ara!an (182) and &a!a*handran (2) ?ere

    ?$th h$! (3) to do the de*orat$on ?or. They de*orated the *#u' and $ts "re!$ses

    and the s*hoo#. Thereafter, &a!a*handran (2) ?anted to ere*t a 'anner $n

    6ar$saun$ road un*t$on. Then raseed (1) stated that he ?ou#d go ho!e and

    *o!e 'a* and he ?a#ed to h$s house. 3 and &a!esan (2) and &a!a*handran

    (2) unfo#ded and he#d the 'anner. 7t that t$!e, an nno;a *ar *a!e fro!

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    35/420

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    36/420

    $nured $n the $n*$dent. -e ?ou#d say that the head and the fa*e of that "erson ?as $n a

    terr$'#e *ond$t$on on a**ount of the $nur$es susta$ned 'y the s?ords. -e ?ent to h$s

    house after the $n*$dent. -e *a!e to no? that the "erson !urdered ?as

    T.. handraseharan.

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    37/420

    (13) "re"ared s*ene !ahaar (EDt.20) and se$ed the art$*#es found at the s*ene

    of the $n*$dent. 4 $dent$f$ed $n the *ourt M

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    38/420

    E;$den*e &egard$ng the 7nn$;ersary of +rothers #u'

    54. 10 Soora u!ar ?as the Se*retary of the +rothers #u' dur$ng the

    year 2012. -e has g$;en e;$den*e as fo##o?s% The ann$;ersary of the *#u' ?as used to

    'e *ondu*ted $n the na!e Hra!otsa;a!K. Th$s "rogra!!e for the year 2012 ?as

    s*hedu#ed to 'e *ondu*ted on 21.04.2012. 7s the rehearsa# of the dra!a to 'e "#ayed

    *ou#d not 'e *o!"#eted, the "rogra!!e *ou#d not 'e *ondu*ted on that day. 7s "er the

    de*$s$on taen $n the genera# 'ody !eet$ng of the *#u', the "rogra!!e ?as "ost"oned

    to 05.05.2012. e*orat$on ?or $n *onne*t$on ?$th the ann$;ersary ?as *ondu*ted 'y

    &a!a*handran (2), raseedan (1), Maneesh (3), &a!esan (2) and

    S$;ara!an (182). e*orat$on ?or had 'egun at a'out 20.00 hours on 04.05.2012.

    7t a'out 21.45 hours on that day, he (10) too the 'anner fro! the off$*e of the *#u'

    and 'rought $t to the s*hoo# and entrusted $t ?$th &a!a*handran (182) and #eft for

    h$s house to ha;e food.

    55. EDt.11 $s the !$nutes 'oo of the +rothers #u'. EDt.10 $s the

    "er!$ss$on granted 'y the y.S., 6ataara for us$ng #oud s"eaer $n the ra!otsa;a!

    "rogra!!e of the *#u' on 05.05.2012. 10 has g$;en e;$den*e that he had "rodu*ed

    these do*u!ents 'efore the $n;est$gat$ng off$*er and they ?ere se$ed as "er EDt.12

    !ahaar. 10 $dent$f$ed h$s s$gnature $n EDt.12 !ahaar.

    5. y.S. Jossy her$yan (15) has g$;en e;$den*e that on the 'as$s of

    the a""#$*at$on !ade 'y 10 for grant$ng "er!$ss$on for us$ng #oud s"eaer on

    05.05.2012 $n *onne*t$on ?$th the ann$;ersary of +rothers #u', he had $ssued EDt.10

    "er!$t to 10.

    5=. EDt.11(a) $s the re#e;ant "age $n EDt.11 !$nutes 'oo ?h$*h *onta$ns

    38

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    39/420

    the !$nutes of the genera# 'ody !eet$ng of the +rothers #u' *ondu*ted on 1=.04.2012.

    The !$nutes of the !eet$ng re*orded $n EDt.11(a) sho? that the ann$;ersary of the *#u'

    ?h$*h ?as s*hedu#ed to 'e he#d on 21.04.2012 ?as "ost"oned to another day. t $s true

    that no de*$s$on ?as taen to *ondu*t the ann$;ersary of the *#u' on 05.05.2012.

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    40/420

    *onta$ns !$nutes of the !eet$ng of the *#u' to the effe*t that ann$;ersary of the *#u' ?as

    "ost"oned to a date 'et?een 05.05.2012 and 10.05.2012 and not to the s"e*$f$* date

    05.05.2012 $nd$*ates that $t $s not a fa'r$*ated do*u!ent. There $s a#so no su'stan*e $n

    the su'!$ss$on 'y the defen*e that EDt.10 $s a do*u!ent *on*o*ted 'y 15.

    0. t $s true that 10 had not stated to the "o#$*e the na!es of 2 and

    1 to 3 as the "ersons ?ho had done the de*orat$on ?or. 10 had a#so not

    stated to the "o#$*e that he had entrusted any 'anner ?$th &a!a*handran (2).

    1. The *ontrad$*t$ons 'y ?ay of o!$ss$ons $n the e;$den*e of 10 as

    !ent$oned a'o;e do not $n any ?ay detra*t the *red$'$#$ty of h$s test$!ony. or they "ut

    any dou't regard$ng the "resen*e of 1 at the t$!e and "#a*e of the $n*$dent. 10

    ?as the Se*retary of the *#u'. n that *a"a*$ty, 10 ?ou#d ha;e 'een engaged and

    "re/o**u"$ed ?$th !any !atters on the e;e of the ann$;ersary of the *#u'. -e ?ou#d

    ha;e 'een ;ery 'usy at that t$!e. -e !ay not ha;e thought $t ne*essary to re*o##e*t h$s

    !e!ory and state 'efore the $n;est$gat$ng off$*er !$nute deta$#s regard$ng the

    arrange!ents !ade 'y h$! on the "re;$ous day e;en$ng $n *onne*t$on ?$th the

    ann$;ersary of the *#u'. 7fter a##, he ?as uest$oned 'y the "o#$*e at the t$!e of

    "rodu*$ng the !$nutes 'oo of the *#u' to the $n;est$gat$ng off$*er. -e ?as not an eye/

    ?$tness to the $n*$dent. n these *$r*u!stan*es, the o!$ss$ons referred to a'o;e $n the

    e;$den*e of 10 are not suff$*$ent to d$s*ard h$s test$!ony as unre#$a'#e.

    the state!ent of a ?$tness re*orded under se*t$on 11 r.. do not tae a?ay the

    nature and *hara*ter of h$s e;$den*e. o su*h o!$ss$ons *o!"e# the *ourt to ree*t

    other?$se *red$t?orthy and a**e"ta'#e e;$den*e of a ?$tness I The ans?er *an on#y 'e

    $n the negat$;e. (See 7#a!g$r 6s. State % 7..& 2003 S 282).

    2. 1 $s a "erson res$d$ng $n the #o*a#$ty. t $s true that he ?as not a

    40

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    41/420

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    42/420

    sha## forth?$th trans!$t to the nearest Jud$*$a# Mag$strate a *o"y of the entr$es $n the

    d$ary re#at$ng to the *ase, and sha## at the sa!e t$!e for?ard the a**used to su*h

    Mag$strate.

    5. Se*t$on 1=2(1) r.. "ro;$des that e;ery "o#$*e off$*er !a$ng an

    $n;est$gat$on under ha"ter L of the ode sha## day 'y day enter h$s "ro*eed$ngs $n

    the $n;est$gat$on $n a d$ary, sett$ng forth the t$!e at ?h$*h the $nfor!at$on rea*hed h$!,

    the t$!e at ?h$*h he 'egan and *#osed h$s $n;est$gat$on, the "#a*e or "#a*es ;$s$ted 'y

    h$!, and a state!ent of the *$r*u!stan*es as*erta$ned through h$s $n;est$gat$on.

    . There $s no "ro;$s$on $n the ode of r$!$na# ro*edure reu$r$ng the

    "o#$*e off$*er to su'!$t a re!and re"ort. +ut under Se*t$on 1= r.. $t $s $!"erat$;e

    that the "o#$*e off$*er shou#d send a#ong ?$th the a**used a *o"y of the entr$es $n the

    *ase d$ary ?h$*h he $s 'ound to !a$nta$n under se*t$on 1=2 r... Csua##y *o"$es of

    the entr$es $n the *ase d$ary are not se"arate#y sent to the Mag$strate. 7 g$st of the

    a'o;e entr$es $n the *ase d$ary a#one $s $n*or"orated 'y the $n;est$gat$ng off$*er $n the

    re!and re"ort or $n the re!and eDtens$on re"ort. The "ur"ose of f$#$ng su*h re"orts and

    the "ur"ose of $n*or"orat$on of the d$ary entr$es $n su*h re"orts $s to ena'#e the

    Mag$strate to de*$de ?hether he shou#d author$e the detent$on or further detent$on of

    the a**used to "o#$*e or ud$*$a# *ustody, as the *ase !ay 'e, or to re#ease the a**used.

    (a!arudheen 6s. S.-.< % .B.& 2010 (3) era#a 8=0).

    =. +efore "ro*eed$ng further, $t $s to 'e noted that as "er the e;$den*e of

    y.S. Jossy her$an (15) $t ?as on the e;en$ng of 05.05.2012 that he re*orded the

    state!ents of raseed (1) and &a!a*handran (2) ?ho *#a$!ed to 'e the eye/

    ?$tnesses to the $n*$dent.

    8. EDt.11 $s the re!and re"ort f$#ed 'y y.S. Santhosh (1) on

    42

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    43/420

    1.05.2012 $n the ourt of the Jud$*$a# A$rst #ass Mag$strate, 6ataara $n res"e*t of the

    a**used &a$th (72=), &a!eesh (728), $"$n (729), &a;eendran (730) and radee"an

    (731). The na!es of 1 and 2 are not !ent$oned $n EDt.11 re"ort. The na!es

    of a**used 2 to 5 and = are !ent$oned $n EDt.11 re"ort 'ut they are not sho?n as the

    a*tua# assa$#ants.

    9. EDt.8 $s the re"ort f$#ed 'y y.S. Jossy her$an (15) $n the ourt

    of the Jud$*$a# A$rst #ass Mag$strate, 6ataara on 1=.05.2012 $n res"e*t of the a**used

    &a!a*handran (78) and three other a**used. The na!es of 1 and 2 are not

    !ent$oned $n EDt.8 re"ort.

    =0. EDt.9 $s the re"ort f$#ed 'y y.S. Jossy her$an (15) $n the ourt

    of the Jud$*$a# A$rst #ass Mag$strate, 6ataara on 24.05.2012 $n res"e*t of the a**used

    .-. 7soan (79) and .. r$shnan (710). The na!es of 1 and 2 are not

    !ent$oned $n EDt.9 re"ort.

    =1. t $s true that na!es of the eye/?$tnesses are not !ent$oned $n the a'o;e

    re!and re"orts. +ut $t $s stated $n these re"orts that the state!ents of the eye/

    ?$tnesses ha;e re;ea#ed so!e fa*ts.

    =2. on/!ent$on$ng of the na!es of 1 and 2 $n EDts. 8, 9 and 11

    re!and re"orts as eye/?$tnesses to the $n*$dent has to 'e *ons$dered ta$ng $nto

    a**ount the s"e*$a# *$r*u!stan*es of th$s *ase. The "rose*ut$on has got a def$n$te *ase

    that #o*a# #eaders of ...(M) had en!$ty to?ards T..handraseharan and $t ?as the

    !ot$;e of the !urder. The assa$#ants a##eged to ha;e *o!!$tted the ghast#y *r$!e ?ere

    at #arge at the t$!e of f$#$ng EDts. 8, 9 and 11 re"orts. They ?ere yet to 'e

    a""rehended 'y the "o#$*e. $s*#os$ng the na!es of the eye/?$tnesses $n the aforesa$d

    re!and re"orts ?ou#d ha;e "osed threat to the #$fe of those ?$tnesses. The

    43

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    44/420

    a""rehens$on enterta$ned 'y the $n;est$gat$ng off$*ers $n th$s regard *annot 'e $gnored

    as 'ase#ess. The fa*t that a #arge nu!'er of ?$tnesses turned host$#e to the "rose*ut$on

    dur$ng the tr$a# of the *ase $s an $nd$*at$on that the a""rehens$on enterta$ned 'y the

    $n;est$gat$ng off$*ers regard$ng danger to the #$fe of the eye/?$tnesses ?as ?e##/founded.

    =3. E;en other?$se, a'sen*e of deta$#s of the eye/?$tnesses or the ro#e of

    ea*h a**used $n the *o!!$ss$on of the offen*es $n the re!and re"orts f$#ed 'y the

    $n;est$gat$ng off$*er *annot 'e a#?ays *ons$dered as fata# to the "rose*ut$on *ase. on/

    *o!"#$an*e ?$th the "ro;$s$on *onta$ned $n se*t$on 1= (1) r.. !ay $n "ro"er *ases

    and a**ord$ng to *$r*u!stan*es #ead to an $nferen*e that the e;$den*e addu*ed 'y the

    "rose*ut$on 'efore the *ourt $s ta$nted. +ut, $n e;ery *ase of su*h $rregu#ar$ty, su*h an

    $nferen*e sha## not 'e dra?n (See a##asanna -aneefa 6s. State of era#a % 19 r$.B.J

    100=).

    =4. 7 $;$s$on +en*h of the -on>'#e -$gh ourt has he#d $n ada;anath$#

    +a'y 6s. State (1983 r$.B.J 118) that e;$den*e *ou#d not 'e d$s*arded on the ground

    of a !ere ;$o#at$on of se*t$on 1= r.. and a ;$o#at$on !ay ta$nt the "rose*ut$on on#y $n

    *ases ?here the fa*ts ust$fy $t.

    =5. Bearned *ounse# for the a**used ?ou#d re#y u"on the de*$s$on of the

    7"eD ourt $n Sur$nder u!ar 6s. State of una' (7..& 1999 S 215) to *ontend that

    a'sen*e of !ater$a# "art$*u#ars $n the re!and re"ort ?ou#d 'e fata# to the "rose*ut$on

    *ase. t ?as a *ase $n ?h$*h the on#y !ater$a# on ?h$*h the "rose*ut$on *ou#d "r$!ar$#y

    re#y u"on to ust$fy the "rayer for re!and$ng the a**used ?as eDtra ud$*$a# *onfess$on

    !ade 'y the a**used 'efore a ?$tness 'ut $t ?as not !ent$oned $n the re!and re"ort. n

    a!arudheen 6s S.-.< (2011 r$.B.J 388), the -on>'#e -$gh ourt has eD"#a$ned the

    aforesa$d de*$s$on of the -on>'#e Su"re!e ourt $n the fo##o?$ng !anner%

    44

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    45/420

    Hn Sur$nder u!ar 6s. State of una', the on#y !ater$a# re#$ed on 'y the

    "rose*ut$on to "ro;e the *harge aga$nst Sur$nder u!ar ?as a *onfess$on !ade to

    . That so#$tary *$r*u!stan*e ?as not !ent$oned $n the re!and a""#$*at$on and that

    ?as taen as an $!"ortant *$r*u!stan*e 'y the 7"eD ourt as an add$t$ona# ground to

    ho#d that the *harge aga$nst Sur$nder u!ar ?as not "ro;ed. n the "resent *ase, the

    re!and re"ort as ?e## as the re!and eDtens$on re"ort "erta$n$ng to 7/10 g$;e a g$st of

    the $n*r$!$nat$ng !ater$a# (though not the ent$re !ater$a#) aga$nst 7/10. -en*e a! not

    $!"ressed 'y the argu!ent 'ased on Sur$nder u!ar>s *aseK.

    =. n Sunny 6s. State of era#a% 2011(3) .B.T 885, the -on>'#e -$gh ourt

    has he#d as fo##o?s%

    H7 re!and re"ort $s for the "ur"ose of ena'#$ng the Mag$strate to sat$sfy

    h$!se#f of the ne*ess$ty to re!and the a**used. 7 "art$*u#ar re!and re"ort has

    s$gn$f$*an*e on#y for the "er$od dur$ng ?h$*h the a**used $s re!anded, un#ess the sa!e

    $s re#$ed on for the re!and of the a**used for su'seuent "er$od a#so. 7 re!and re"ort

    need not *onta$n a## the deta$#s ?h$*h are a;a$#a'#e $n the A$rst nfor!at$on State!ent

    and the other !ater$a#s *o##e*ted dur$ng $n;est$gat$on. The re!and re"ort need on#y

    *onta$n suff$*$ent !ater$a#s to arr$;e at the *on*#us$on that detent$on of the a**used $s

    ne*essary or the *ont$nued detent$on of the a**used $s ne*essaryK.

    ==. n the #$ght of the a'o;e, *ons$der$ng the fa*ts and *$r*u!stan*es of the

    "resent *ase, $t *annot 'e found that non/!ent$on$ng the na!es of 1 and 2 $n the

    re!and re"orts as eye/?$tnesses to the $n*$dent #eads to the $nferen*e that they are

    ?$tnesses "ro*ured 'y the $n;est$gat$ng off$*ers at a #ater stage to "roe*t the

    "rose*ut$on *ase $n a "art$san !anner.

    45

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    46/420

    7'sen*e of a!es of 1 and 2 $n EDt.1 Mahaar

    =8. 7nother *ontent$on ra$sed 'y the #earned *ounse# for the a**used $s ?$th

    regard to the non/!ent$on$ng of the na!es of 1 and 2 as eye/?$tnesses to the

    $n*$dent $n EDt.1 !ahaar. EDt.1 $s the !ahaar "re"ared 'y y.S. Jossy her$an

    (15) for se$ure of the nno;a *ar B/58 8144 ?h$*h ?as found a'andoned at the

    "#a*e unath$#!uu. The !ahaar ?as "re"ared at 15.00 hours on 05.05.2012. The

    e;$den*e of 1 $s that a#ong?$th &a!a*handran (2) he had a**o!"an$ed 15

    to the "#a*e ?here the *ar ?as found a'andoned and that he $dent$f$ed the *ar as the

    ;eh$*#e $n ?h$*h the assa$#ants *a!e to the s*ene of the o**urren*e. 1 and 2

    ha;e aff$Ded the$r s$gnature $n EDt.1 !ahaar as attestors. t $s true that there $s no

    re*$ta# $n EDt.1 !ahaar that 1 and 2 $dent$f$ed the *ar. t $s a#so not !ent$oned

    $n EDt.1 !ahaar that 1 and 2 are eye/?$tnesses to the $n*$dent. t $s to 'e

    re!e!'ered that 'efore the "re"arat$on of EDt.1 !ahaar 15 had not re*orded

    the state!ents of 1 and 2. 7t that t$!e, 15 ?as a?are of the fa*t that 1

    and 2 ?ere "ersons ?ho had seen the $n*$dent. +ut, $n ;$e? of the fa*t that 15

    had not re*orded the$r state!ents at that t$!e, there $s noth$ng unusua# or strange $n not

    !ent$on$ng the$r na!es $n EDt.1 !ahaar as eye/?$tnesses to the $n*$dent. EDt.1

    !ahaar 'ears the $n$t$a# of the Mag$strate ?$th the date 0=.05.2012. The date

    0.05.2012 ?as a Sunday. EDt.1 !ahaar *onta$n$ng the s$gnatures of 1 and 2

    had rea*hed the Mag$strate on 0=.05.2012. n these *$r*u!stan*es, non/!ent$on$ng of

    the na!es of 1 and 2 as eye/?$tnesses $n EDt.1 !ahaar does not #ead to an

    $nferen*e that they are eye/?$tnesses "ro*ured 'y the $n;est$gat$ng off$*ers at a #ater

    "o$nt of t$!e.

    46

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    47/420

    e#ay $n &e*ord$ng the State!ent of 1

    =9. There $s a#so no !er$t $n the "#ea of the defen*e that there ?as undue

    de#ay $n re*ord$ng the state!ents of 1 and 2 under se*t$on 11 r.. 'y

    15. 7 ?ho#e read$ng of the e;$den*e of 15 ?ou#d sho? that throughout the day

    of 05.05.2012 he ?as fu##y engaged $n the $n;est$gat$on of the *ase. t ?as at a'out

    11.00 hours on 05.05.2012 he *a!e to no? that 1 and 2 ?ere eye/?$tnesses to

    the $n*$dent. +y that t$!e 15 had got $nfor!at$on that the *ar ?h$*h ?as sus"e*ted

    to 'e $n;o#;ed $n the $n*$dent ?as found a'andoned at the "#a*e unath$#!uu.

    7#ong?$th 1 and 2, he had rea*hed that "#a*e. 7fter the eDa!$nat$on of the *ar

    'y the forens$* eD"erts, 15 *ou#d "re"are se$ure !ahaar (EDt.1) of the *ar on#y

    at 15.00 hours.

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    48/420

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    49/420

    Stat$on on the date of the $n*$dent. -e ?as one of the "ersons ?ho had a**o!"an$ed

    Su' ns"e*tor Mano (4) to the s*ene of the $n*$dent and rea*hed there at a'out

    22.40 hours. 4 Su' ns"e*tor had "ut h$! on s*ene guard duty on that n$ght.

    125 ?ou#d say that the t?o "ersons ?ho ?ere "resent at the s*ene of the $n*$dent

    and ?ho he#"ed the "o#$*e "arty to get the ;$*t$! $nto the ee" re!a$ned at the s"ot t$##

    neDt day !orn$ng.

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    50/420

    ad;an*ed te*hn$ues $n te*hno#ogy ?ere used and 'rought $n a$d. Storage, "ro*ess$ng

    and trans!$ss$on of data on !agnet$* and s$#$*on !ed$u! 'e*a!e *ost effe*t$;e and

    easy to hand#e. on;ent$ona# !eans of re*ords and data "ro*ess$ng 'e*a!e out/dated.

    Ba? had to res"ond and ga##o" ?$th the te*hn$*a# ad;an*e!ent. Ba? d$d not s#ee" ?hen

    the da?n of nfor!at$on and Te*hno#ogy 'roe on the hor$on. or#d o;er, statutes ?ere

    ena*ted. &u#es re#at$ng to ad!$ss$'$#$ty of e#e*tron$* e;$den*e and $ts "roof ha;e 'een

    $n*or"orated $n the nd$an E;$den*e 7*t a#so.

    88. n th$s *onteDt, $t ?ou#d 'e ad;antageous to !ae referen*e as to ho?

    re*ord of the *a##s !ade fro! and to a *e## "hone 'e*o!es usefu# $n the tr$a# of a *ase to

    $dent$fy the "resen*e of a "art$*u#ar "erson $n and around a s"e*$f$* "#a*e and a#so to

    $dent$fy the !o'$#e "hone fro! ?h$*h the *a##s ha;e 'een !ade.

    89. 7n a*t$;e !o'$#e "hone has t?o *o!"onents, that $s, the !o'$#e

    $nstru!ent and the SM *ard. E;ery !o'$#e $nstru!ent has a un$ue $dent$f$*at$on

    nu!'er, na!e#y, nstru!ent Manufa*tured Eu$"!ent dent$ty, for short, ME nu!'er.

    Su*h SM *ard *ou#d 'e "ro;$ded 'y the ser;$*e "ro;$ders e$ther ?$th *ash *ard or "ost

    "a$d *ard to the su's*r$'er and on*e th$s SM *ard $s a*t$;ated the nu!'er $s generated

    ?h$*h $s *o!!on#y no?n as !o'$#e nu!'er. The !o'$#e ser;$*e $s o"erated through a

    !a$n ser;er *o!"uter *a##ed !o'$#e s?$t*h$ng *entre ?h$*h hand#es and re*ords ea*h

    and e;ery !o;e!ent of an a*t$;e !o'$#e "hone #$e day and t$!e of the *a##, durat$on of

    the *a##, *a##$ng and the *a##ed nu!'er, #o*at$on of the su's*r$'er dur$ng a*t$;e *a## and

    the un$ue ME nu!'er of the $nstru!ent used 'y the su's*r$'er dur$ng an a*t$;e *a##.

    Th$s !o'$#e s?$t*h$ng *entre !anages a## th$s through ;ar$ous su'/syste!s or su'/

    stat$ons and f$na##y ?$th the he#" of te#e"hone to?ers. These to?ers are a*tua##y +ase

    Trans/re*e$;er Stat$ons a#so no?n as +TS. Su*h +TS *o;ers a set of *e##s ea*h of

    50

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    51/420

    the! $dent$f$ed 'y a un$ue *e## . 7 !o'$#e *ont$nuous#y se#e*ts a *e## and eD*hanges

    data and s$gna##$ng traff$* ?$th the *orres"ond$ng +T. Therefore, through a *e## the

    #o*at$on of the a*t$;e !o'$#e $nstru!ent *an 'e a""roD$!ated (Mohd. 7r$f : 7shfa 6s

    State of T of e#h$ % (2011) 13 S 21).

    90. n ara 6s. State (T) of e#h$N (2011) 10 S =5N 2012 r$.B.J 413,

    $t has 'een he#d as fo##o?s%

    HThe e;$den*e "rodu*ed 'y the "rose*ut$on $s 'ased on one $rrefuta'#e

    fa*t, na!e#y, e;ery !o'$#e handset has an eD*#us$;e EM nu!'er. o t?o !o'$#e

    handsets ha;e the sa!e EM nu!'er. 7nd e;ery t$!e a !o'$#e handset $s used for

    !a$ng a *a##, 'es$des re*ord$ng the nu!'er of the *a##er as ?e## as the "erson *a##ed,

    the EM nu!'ers of the handsets used are a#so re*orded 'y the ser;$*e "ro;$der. The

    aforesa$d fa*tua# "os$t$on has to 'e e"t $n !$nd ?h$#e eDa!$n$ng the "rose*ut$on

    e;$den*e OOOOe are sat$sf$ed, that the "ro*ess 'y ?h$*h the a**used/a""e##ant

    *a!e to 'e $dent$f$ed dur$ng the *ourse of $n;est$gat$on, ?as #eg$t$!ate and unassa$#a'#e.

    The EM nu!'er of the handset, on ?h$*h the a**used/a""e##ant ?as !a$ng *a##s 'y

    us$ng a !o'$#e "hone (s$!) reg$stered $n h$s na!e, 'e$ng e;$den*e of a *on*#us$;e

    nature, *annot 'e o;er#ooed on the 'as$s of su*h #$e !$nor d$s*re"an*$es . n fa*t e;en

    a ser$ous d$s*re"an*y $n ora# e;$den*e, ?ou#d ha;e had to y$e#d to the aforesa$d

    s*$ent$f$* e;$den*e.GG

    91. The aforesa$d de*$s$on $n ara>s *ase has 'een fo##o?ed $n rashant

    +hart$ 6s State % (2013) 3 S (r$) 92 % (2013) 9 S 293.

    92. n State 6s. a;ot Sandhu : 7fsan uru % 2005 r$.B.J 3950 % (2005) 11

    S 00, the -onG'#e Su"re!e ourt has he#d that e;en se*ondary e;$den*e $s

    ad!$ss$'#e to "ro;e the *a## data re*ords of a *e## "hone. t ?as *ontended 'y the

    51

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    52/420

    defen*e $n that *ase that $n the a'sen*e of a *ert$f$*ate $ssued under su'/se*t$on (2) of

    se*t$on 5+ of the E;$den*e 7*t ?$th the "art$*u#ars enu!erated $n *#auses (a) to (e), the

    $nfor!at$on *onta$ned $n the e#e*tron$* re*ord *annot 'e addu*ed $n e;$den*e and $n any

    *ase $n the a'sen*e of eDa!$nat$on of a *o!"etent ?$tness a*ua$nted ?$th the

    fun*t$on$ng of the *o!"uters dur$ng the re#e;ant t$!e and the !anner $n ?h$*h the

    "r$ntouts ?ere taen, e;en se*ondary e;$den*e under Se*t$on 3 of the E;$den*e 7*t $s

    not ad!$ss$'#e. The 7"eD ourt re"e##ed these *ontent$ons and he#d that Se*t$on 5 of

    the E;$den*e 7*t ena'#es se*ondary e;$den*e of the *ontents of a do*u!ent to 'e

    addu*ed $f the or$g$na# $s of su*h a nature as not to 'e eas$#y !o;a'#e and as the

    $nfor!at$on *onta$ned $n the *a## re*ords $s stored $n huge ser;ers ?h$*h *annot 'e

    eas$#y !o;ed and "rodu*ed $n the *ourt, "r$ntouts taen fro! the *o!"utersser;ers 'y

    !e*han$*a# "ro*ess and *ert$f$ed 'y a res"ons$'#e off$*$a# of the ser;$*e "ro;$d$ng

    *o!"any *an 'e #ed $nto e;$den*e through a ?$tness ?ho *an $dent$fy the s$gnatures of

    the *ert$fy$ng off$*er or other?$se s"ea to the fa*ts 'ased on h$s "ersona# no?#edge. t

    ?as he#d that $rres"e*t$;e of the *o!"#$an*e of the reu$re!ents of Se*t$on 5+ of the

    E;$den*e 7*t ?h$*h $s a "ro;$s$on dea#$ng ?$th ad!$ss$'$#$ty of e#e*tron$* re*ords, there $s

    no 'ar to addu*e se*ondary e;$den*e under the other "ro;$s$ons of the E;$den*e 7*t,

    na!e#y Se*t$ons 3 and 5. The 7"eD ourt a#so found no su'stan*e $n the *ontent$on

    of the defen*e that the ?$tnesses eDa!$ned ?ere not te*hn$*a# "ersons a*ua$nted ?$th

    the fun*t$on$ng of the *o!"uters nor they do ha;e "ersona# no?#edge of the deta$#s

    stored $n the ser;ers of the *o!"uters.t ?as a#so he#d that the "r$ntouts "erta$n$ng to the

    *a## deta$#s eDh$'$ted 'y the "rose*ut$on ?ere of su*h regu#ar$ty and *ont$nu$ty that $t

    ?ou#d 'e #eg$t$!ate to dra? a "resu!"t$on that the syste! ?as fun*t$ona# and the out"ut

    ?as "rodu*ed 'y the *o!"uter $n regu#ar use, ?hether th$s fa*t ?as s"e*$f$*a##y de"osed

    52

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    53/420

    to 'y the ?$tness or not.

    a## ata &e*ord of the e## hone of 1

    93. 1 has g$;en e;$den*e that h$s !o'$#e "hone nu!'er $s 9048014554.

    -e ?ou#d say that he does not re!e!'er ?hether the ser;$*e *onne*t$on of th$s nu!'er

    $s $n h$s na!e or $n the na!e of h$s ?$fe. -e has de"osed that the !o'$#e "hone ha;$ng

    the aforesa$d SM *ard $s 'e$ng used 'y h$! and a#so h$s ?$fe.

    94. EDt.24 $s the *a## data re*ord of the SM ha;$ng the nu!'er

    9048014554. Th$s do*u!ent $s "ro;ed through 152, ?ho $s the oda#

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    54/420

    has no !o'$#e "hone to?er at 6a##$ad.

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    55/420

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    56/420

    $nde"endent *and$date. t ?ou#d not !ean that 1 $s a sy!"ath$er of &.M.. t ?as

    then suggested to 1 $n the *ross eDa!$nat$on that he has 'e*o!e a ?$tness $n the

    *ase as he ?as a *#ose fr$end and asso*$ate of &a!a*handran (2) ?ho ?as a

    ?orer of &.M.. There $s a'so#ute#y no !ater$a# to f$nd that 1 has got any s"e*$a#

    $nterest $n the *ase to see that the a**used are so!eho? *on;$*ted.

    100. E;en other?$se, e;$den*e of a ?$tness ?ho 'e#ongs to a r$;a# "o#$t$*a#

    "arty *annot 'e d$s*arded on that ground. n My#ad$!!a# Surendran 6s. State of

    era#a% 7..& 2010 S 3281, the -on>'#e Su"re!e ourt has he#d that "o#$t$*a# host$#$ty

    of ?$tnesses to?ards the a**used does not !er$t ree*t$on of the$r e;$den*e. t ?as a

    *ase re#at$ng to the !urder of a #o*a# #eader of +harath$ya Janatha arty and the

    a**used ?ere ..(M) ?orers. &egard$ng the e;$den*e of t?o eye/?$tnesses $n that

    *ase, the 7"eD ourt he#d as fo##o?s%

    HMere#y 'e*ause 2 and 3 are sy!"ath$ers of +.J., the$r e;$den*e

    *annot 'e 'rushed as$de. 7t 'est, the$r e;$den*e has to 'e *arefu##y s*rut$n$ed.K

    101. -o?e;er, $n the "resent *ase, there $s no !ater$a# at a## e;en to $nd$*ate

    that 1 $s an a*t$;$st or sy!"ath$er of &.M.. -e has no reason to fa#se#y s?ear

    aga$nst the a**used.

    ondu*t and &ea*t$on of 1

    102. Bearned Sen$or ounse# Sr$. M.. a!odaran and Sr$. +. &a!an $##a$

    ha;e strong#y urged that the *ondu*t and rea*t$on of 1 on a##eged#y see$ng the

    !urderous assau#t on the ;$*t$! ?ere not natura# and $t $s suff$*$ent to dou't h$s

    "resen*e at the s*ene of the $n*$dent ?hen $t o**urred. Bearned *ounse# ?ou#d *ontend

    that the *ondu*t of 1 $n not !a$ng any effort to tae the ;$*t$! to the hos"$ta# and to

    $nfor! the "o#$*e regard$ng the $n*$dent ra$ses strong dou't as to ?hether he had

    56

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    57/420

    a*tua##y seen the $n*$dent.

    103. 1 has g$;en e;$den*e that he d$d not !ae any atte!"t to re!o;e

    the !otor *y*#e ?h$*h ?as #y$ng on the #egs of the ;$*t$!. -e ?ou#d say that $t ?as a

    horr$d s*ene and $t ?as e;en d$ff$*u#t to #oo at the ;$*t$!. 1 has de"osed that he d$d

    not !ae any atte!"t to g$;e $nfor!at$on regard$ng the $n*$dent to the "o#$*e stat$on or

    the hos"$ta# o;er "hone. -e ?ou#d say that he d$d not go to the house of any "erson

    ?ho o?ned a ;eh$*#e. -e d$d not !ae "hone *a## to any su*h house to get ;eh$*#e to

    tae the ;$*t$! to the hos"$ta#. -e d$d not *ry a#oud or !ae atte!"t to 'r$ng others to

    the s*ene of the $n*$dent. hen 4 *a!e to the s*ene of the $n*$dent, he d$d not te##

    h$! that the had seen the $n*$dent. s the *ondu*t of 1 suff$*$ent to !ae an

    $nferen*e that he d$d not a*tua##y see the $n*$dent I

    104. n the oft/uoted de*$s$on $n &ana arta" 6s State of -aryana% 7..&

    1983 S 80, the 7"eD ourt has he#d as fo##o?s%

    HE;ery "erson ?ho ?$tnesses a !urder rea*ts $n h$s o?n ?ay. So!e are

    stunned, 'e*o!e s"ee*h#ess and stand rooted to the s"ot. So!e 'e*o!e hyster$* and

    start ?a$#$ng. So!e start shout$ng for he#".

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    58/420

    HThe ourt sha## ha;e to 'ear $n !$nd that d$fferent ?$tnesses rea*t

    d$fferent#y under d$fferent s$tuat$ons% ?hereas so!e 'e*o!e s"ee*h#ess, so!e start

    ?a$#$ng ?h$#e so!e others run a?ay fro! the s*ene and yet there are so!e ?ho !ay

    *o!e for?ard ?$th *ourage, *on;$*t$on and 'e#$ef that ?rong shou#d 'e re!ed$ed. 7s a

    !atter of fa*t $t de"ends u"on $nd$;$dua#s and $nd$;$dua#s. There *annot 'e any set

    "attern or un$for! ru#e of hu!an rea*t$on and to d$s*ard a "$e*e of e;$den*e on the

    ground of h$s rea*t$on not fa##$ng ?$th$n a set "attern $s un"rodu*t$;e and a "edant$*

    eDer*$seK.

    10. n C!esh 6s State% 200= (4) Su"re!e =52, $t has 'een o'ser;ed as

    fo##o?s%

    He are una'#e to a**e"t the *ontent$on of the #earned *ounse# for the

    a""e##ant that the *ondu*t of the eye/?$tnesses $s unnatura# as they had not d$s*#osed

    the genes$s of the $n*$dent to the !e!'ers of the fa!$#y of the de*eased on the sa!e

    day or they had not $!!ed$ate#y re"orted the !atter to the "o#$*e.

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    59/420

    has 'een he#d as fo##o?s%

    H

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    60/420

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    61/420

    that they ?ou#d $n the$r enthus$as! go a## out, as though $ns"$red 'y !$ss$onary ea# to

    *onta*t the "o#$*e and $nfor! the! a'out the *r$!e (7"ren Jose"h 6s State of era#a%

    7..& 19=3 S 1).

    111. o stra$ght/a*et for!u#a or "r$n*$"#e *an 'e #a$d do?n as to ho? a

    "art$*u#ar "erson ?ho ?$tnesses a *r$!e ?$## rea*t to su*h a s$tuat$on. t $s not a#?ays

    ne*essary that $n a g$;en s$tuat$on s$!$#ar#y "#a*ed "ersons ?$## rea*t $n the sa!e

    fash$on. Mu*h ?$## de"end on the fa*t s$tuat$on of ea*h $n*$dent and a#so the $nd$;$dua#

    'eha;$our of the "erson $n*#ud$ng h$s "sy*he.

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    62/420

    seen the ghast#y *r$!e. o?/a/days "eo"#e ee" the!se#;es a?ay fro! the "o#$*e

    stat$on and the *ourt un#ess $t $s $ne;$ta'#e. Many ?ou#d th$n of the trau!a they !ay

    ha;e to undergo 'e$ng a ?$tness $n a *r$!$na# *ase. nde"endent ?$tnesses !ay a#so

    th$n that 'y g$;$ng e;$den*e $n a *ase of !urder ?h$*h has got "o#$t$*a# o;ertones the$r

    #$fe $s at r$s. t $s a no?n fa*t that $nde"endent "ersons are re#u*tant to 'e a ?$tness or

    to ass$st the $n;est$gat$on. &easons are not far to see. A$rst#y, they 'e#$e;e that the$r

    safety $s not guaranteed 'y s"ea$ng the truth 'efore the *ourt.

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    63/420

    to get the ;$*t$! $nto the ee".

    114. The su'!$ss$on "erta$n$ng to non/se$ure of the *#othes of 1 needs

    to 'e noted and dea#t ?$th $n the *onteDt of the de*$s$on of the -on>'#e Su"re!e ourt $n

    urunath ona""a er$ 6s. State of arnataa % 7..& 2009 S (Su"")1485% 2009

    r$.B.J 2995 ?here$n a s$!$#ar *ontent$on ?as ad;an*ed on 'eha#f of the a**used

    "ersons. &e"e##$ng the sa$d *ontent$on, $t ?as he#d that the sa$d fa*t !ere#y "o$nts out

    an error on the "art of the $n;est$gat$ng off$*er and the sa!e, 'y $tse#f, $s not suff$*$ent to

    d$s*ard the ent$re "rose*ut$on *ase.

    115. n -ar"a# S$ngh 6s e;$nder S$ngh (199=) S 0 % 7..& 199= S

    2914N 199= r$. B.J 351, the -on>'#e Su"re!e ourt has he#d as fo##o?s%

    Hf the *#othes ?orn 'y the $nured or the ;$*t$!s ?ere not re*o;ered 'y the

    $n;est$gat$ng tea! that "erha"s ?ou#d ha;e "ro;$ded a hand#e to the defen*e to atta*

    the "rose*ut$on *ase. +ut no $n;est$gat$ng agen*y ?ou#d nor!a##y tae the trou'#e to

    se$e the *#othes ?orn 'y ?$tnesses at the t$!e they sa? the o**urren*e !ere#y

    'e*ause the$r *#othes too had *o##e*ted sta$ns of '#ood dur$ng any "ost e;ent a*t$;$t$es.

    7t any rate, the sa$d o!$ss$on on the "art of the $n;est$gat$ng agen*y $s not a f#a? of that

    ty"e to $n;$te the *onseuen*e of ett$son$ng h$s test$!onyK.

    E;$den*e of 1 &egard$ng the n*$dent &e#$a'$#$ty

    11.

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    64/420

    $dent$f$*at$on of M

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    65/420

    sat$sfa*tory eD"#anat$on has 'een offered 'y 2 for the de#ay $n d$s*#os$ng the deta$#s

    of the $n*$dent to the "o#$*e and $t de!o#$shes h$s test$!ony. t $s further *ontended that

    he $s a "art$san and $nterested ?$tness and no re#$an*e *an 'e "#a*ed u"on h$s

    test$!ony.

    &e#$a'$#$ty of the E;$den*e of 2

    119. The e;$den*e of Soora u!ar (10), the Se*retary of +rothers #u',

    ?ou#d sho? that 2 ?as one of the "ersons ?ho ?as engaged $n the ?or of

    de*orat$ng the "re!$ses of the *#u' $n *onne*t$on ?$th $ts ann$;ersary. +ut, $t does not

    !ean that 2 ?as "resent at the s*ene of the $n*$dent ?hen $t o**urred.

    120. The state!ent of 2 ?as re*orded 'y the $n;est$gat$ng off$*er

    (15) on 09.05.2012. The e;$den*e of 2 $s that on see$ng the $n*$dent he ?as

    ;ery !u*h s*ared and therefore, on the neDt day, he #eft h$s house and ?ent to the

    house of the 'rother of h$s father at arth$a"a##y ?h$*h $s at a d$stan*e of a'out s$D

    $#o!etres and he stayed there t$## 09.05.2012. Th$s $s the eD"#anat$on offered 'y 2

    for the de#ay $n g$;$ng state!ent to the "o#$*e.

    121. e#ay $n g$;$ng state!ent to the "o#$*e, does not ne*essar$#y, de!o#$sh

    test$!ony. 7s not$*ed ear#$er, there *annot 'e un$for!$ty $n hu!an rea*t$on. erta$n

    ?$tnesses $n *erta$n *$r*u!stan*es !ay get s*ared and !ay !ae the!se#;es a;a$#a'#e

    to the "o#$*e on#y 'e#ated#y and thus re*ord$ng of the$r state!ent 'y the "o#$*e !ay get

    de#ayed. n the "resent *ase, $f 2 had ?$tnessed the $n*$dent, $t $s u$te "ro'a'#e that

    he got fr$ghtened and on a**ount of fear, he !ade h$!se#f not a;a$#a'#e for $nterrogat$on

    'y the "o#$*e.

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    66/420

    a**ount of fear he a;o$ded go$ng to the "o#$*e stat$on $!!ed$ate#y. The ghast#y and

    grueso!e *r$!e !ust ha;e sent a sh$;er $n h$s s"$ne and #eft h$! *onfounded. 7fter a

    fe? days, he ?ou#d ha;e !ustered *ourage and "ro*eeded to the "o#$*e stat$on.

    122. 2 has de"osed that 808149223 $s the nu!'er of the !o'$#e "hone

    ?h$*h ?as 'e$ng used 'y h$! 'efore and after the $n*$dent. -e ?ou#d say that the *e##

    "hone ser;$*e *onne*t$on $s $n the na!e of h$s *o/?orer 'y na!e hanesh. 7 s"e*$f$*

    suggest$on ?as !ade to 2 $n the *ross eDa!$nat$on that the !o'$#e "hone ha;$ng the

    nu!'er 808149223 ?as $n h$s "ossess$on on the date of the $n*$dent and on the days

    'efore and after the $n*$dent. 2 ?ou#d say that he does not re!e!'er a'out $t. -e

    has a#so g$;en e;$den*e that he ?as a#so us$ng the !o'$#e "hone of h$s ?$fe.

    123. EDt.2 $s the *a## data re*ord of the !o'$#e "hone ha;$ng the nu!'er

    808149223 for the "er$od fro! 04.05.2012 to 09.05.2012. The ser;$*e *onne*t$on of

    th$s !o'$#e "hone $s "ro;$ded 'y 6odafone o!"any. EDt.2 has 'een "ro;ed through

    152, the oda#

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    67/420

    "#a*e Mada""a##$. The e;$den*e of 152 sho?s that 6odafone o!"any has no

    !o'$#e "hone to?er $n 6a##$ad. There $s no e;$den*e as to under ?h$*h to?er the

    "#a*e 6a##$ad ?ou#d *o!e. Therefore, EDt.2 *a## data re*ord does not he#" the

    defen*e to "ro;e that 2 ?as not at the "#a*e of the $n*$dent at or a'out the t$!e at

    ?h$*h $t o**urred.

    12. The e;$den*e of 152 and EDt.2 *a## data re*ord ?ou#d sho? that

    on 05.05.2012, the to?er #o*at$ons of the !o'$#e "hone nu!'er 808149223 at ;ar$ous

    t$!es ?ere 6e##$u#angara, Mada""a##$, oh$ode, ayyo#$, 6adaara and

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    68/420

    12=. +efore ana#ys$ng the e;$den*e of 2 any further, ?hat ha""ened

    dur$ng h$s *ross eDa!$nat$on has to 'e ad;erted to. EDa!$nat$on/$n/*h$ef of th$s ?$tness

    ?as he#d on 12.02.2013 and $t ?as *ont$nued on 15.02.2013. -e ?as *ross/eDa!$ned

    on 15.02.2013 $tse#f. hen h$s *ross/eDa!$nat$on ?as resu!ed after #un*h/'rea on

    that day, 2 found $t d$ff$*u#t to "ro"er#y ans?er the uest$ons "ut to h$!. Bearned

    *ounse# Sr$. +.&a!an $##a ?ho ?as *ondu*t$ng *ross/eDa!$nat$on then su'!$tted that $t

    a""eared to h$! that the ?$tness had *onsu!ed a#*oho#. The *ourt then sent the

    ?$tness for !ed$*a# eDa!$nat$on. The ?$tness ?as ad!$tted $n the Med$*a# o##ege

    -os"$ta#, oh$ode. Med$*a# eDa!$nat$on of 2 on 15.02.2013 sho?ed that he ?as

    not drun. The !ed$*a# *ert$f$*ate $ssued fro! the hos"$ta# sho?ed that he had

    sy!"to!s of *hest d$s*o!fort and de*reased ;er'a# out"ut. Aurther *ross eDa!$nat$on

    of 2 ?as *ondu*ted on#y on 23.04.2013 after he ?as d$s*harged fro! the hos"$ta#.

    128. The aforesa$d fa*ts ha;e 'een ad;erted to here $n the *onteDt that so!e

    of the ans?ers g$;en 'y 2 dur$ng the *ross/eDa!$nat$on on the t?o days, that $s,

    15.02.2013 and 23.04.2013, are at ;ar$an*e ?$th ea*h other.

    129. 7 s"e*$f$* suggest$on ?as !ade to 2 $n the *ross/eDa!$nat$on that he

    ?as an a*t$;$st of &.M. 'ut he den$ed $t. ur$ng h$s eDa!$nat$on on 15.02.2013 2

    has de"osed that he ?as not a?are ?hether h$s 'rother +a#an $s an a*t$;$st of &.M..

    -o?e;er, dur$ng the eDa!$nat$on on 23.04.2013 he ?ou#d say that +a#an $s an a*t$;$st of

    &.M.. 2 den$ed the suggest$on !ade to h$! that he ?as the e#e*t$on agent of

    T.. handraseharan $n the Bo Sa'ha e#e*t$ons he#d $n the year 2009. ur$ng the

    eDa!$nat$on on 15.02.2013, 2 has de"osed that he does not no? Sadas$;an. -e

    ?ou#d say that he does not re!e!'er ?hether Sadas$;an had *ontested the

    68

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    69/420

    an*hayath e#e*t$on $n ard o.4 of the horode an*hayath $n ?h$*h he $s res$d$ng.

    -e den$ed the suggest$on !ade to h$! that he ?as the e#e*t$on agent of Sadas$;an. -e

    ?ou#d say that he had not a*ted as 'ooth agent $n any e#e*t$on. -o?e;er, dur$ng h$s

    eDa!$nat$on on 23.04.2013, 2 ?ou#d say that he does not re!e!'er ?hether he had

    a*ted as "o#$ng agent or 'ooth agent of &.M.. -e ?ou#d then say that he does not

    re!e!'er and that he $s not a?are ?hether Sadas$;an ?as a *and$date $n ard o.4 of

    horode an*hayath. 2 den$ed the s$gnature sho?n to h$! $n the #$st of "o##$ng

    agents (!ared as EDt.3 #ater).

    130. 8 o##y $s the 7ss$stant $re*tor of 7gr$*u#ture, 6ataara. 7s "er the

    su!!ons $ssued fro! the *ourt, 8 "rodu*ed 'efore the *ourt the a**ount of "a"er

    sea#s used $n the e#e*t$on 'ooth $n 6ar$saun$ C.. S*hoo# $n ard o.4 of horode

    an*hayath ?h$*h ?as e"t $n her off$*e. She "rodu*ed t?o su*h do*u!ents ?h$*h

    ha;e 'een !ared as EDts. 3 and 4. These do*u!ents *onta$n a #$st of "o##$ng

    agents ?$th the$r s$gnature.

    131. The "#ea of the defen*e $s that 2 ?as a "o##$ng agent of Sadas$;an, a

    *and$date of &.M., $n the an*hayath e#e*t$on $n ard o.4 of horode an*hayath

    and that 2 has s$gned EDts.3 and 4 do*u!ents as "o##$ng agent $n h$s na!e

    $neshan.

    132. 8 had no o**as$on to see 2 "utt$ng h$s s$gnature $n EDts.3 and

    4 do*u!ents. -er e;$den*e does not he#" the defen*e to "ro;e that 2 has "ut h$s

    s$gnature $n these do*u!ents as "o##$ng agent of any *and$date.

    133. 9 6asu has de"osed that he ?as the "o##$ng agent of ..(M)

    *and$date T.M. &aan $n ard o.4 of horode an*hayath. -e has stated that

    .. Sadas$;an ?as the *and$date of &.M. $n that ?ard. 9 has a#so de"osed that

    69

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    70/420

    2 $s h$s ne$gh'our and that he $s an a*t$;e ?orer of &.M.. 9 $dent$f$ed h$s

    s$gnature $n EDts.3 and 4 do*u!ents ?h$*h ?as "ut 'y h$! $n h$s *a"a*$ty as

    "o##$ng agent. 9 has stated that the "o##$ng agents s$gned the aforesa$d do*u!ents

    after the e#e*t$on on 23.10.2010. 9 ?ou#d a#so say that 2 $s the "erson ?ho has

    s$gned $n EDts.3 and 4 do*u!ents as the f$fth "erson.

    134. 9 has stated $n the *ross/eDa!$nat$on that Sadas$;an had *ontested

    the e#e*t$on as an $nde"endent *and$date 'ut he ?as a *and$date of &.M.. t $s to 'e

    noted that &.M. had not o'ta$ned re*ogn$t$on as a "o#$t$*a# "arty then and therefore, the

    *and$dates of that "arty *ou#d ha;e *ontested the e#e*t$on on#y as $nde"endent

    *and$dates. 9 has asserted that 2 had s$gned EDts.3 and 4 do*u!ents

    'efore the res$d$ng s #$st $s $neshan. t $s on#y "ro'a'#e that he

    had s$gned EDts. 3 and 4 do*u!ents 'y ?r$t$ng h$s na!e as $nesh. n th$s

    *onteDt $t $s to 'e re!e!'ered that 2 had at f$rst de"osed that he d$d not no?

    Sadas$;an. Su'seuent#y, he ?ou#d say that he does not re!e!'er ?hether Sadas$;an

    ?as a *and$date $n ard o.4 $n the e#e*t$on. t $s to 'e re!e!'ered that 2 $s a

    "erson res$d$ng $n ard o.4 of horode an*hayath. 2 ?ou#d at f$rst say that he

    had ne;er a*ted as a 'ooth agent $n any e#e*t$on. Su'seuent#y, he ?ou#d say that he

    does not re!e!'er ?hether he ?as a "o##$ng agent or 'ooth agent of &.M..

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    71/420

    read$ng of the de"os$t$on of 2 as a ?ho#e, the $!"ress$on one *ou#d for! $s that he $s

    a sy!"ath$er or a*t$;$st of &.M. 'ut he $s re#u*tant to ad!$t that fa*t.

    13. 2 ?ou#d at f$rst say that he does not no? ?hether h$s 'rother +a#an

    $s an a*t$;$st of &.M.. Su'seuent#y, he ?ou#d *on*ede that +a#an $s an &.M. ?orer.

    -e has de"osed that +a#an ?as atta*ed and $nured 'y so!e "ersons 'ut he does not

    no? ?ho had atta*ed +a#an. 7 s"e*$f$* uest$on ?as "ut to 2 ?hether $n h$s

    "resen*e the ?$fe of +a#an had g$;en state!ent to the "o#$*e. 2 ?ou#d say that he

    does not re!e!'er. -e has stated that he had gone to the hos"$ta# to see +a#an. -e

    has de"osed that he ?as not "resent ?hen the "o#$*e re*orded the f$rst $nfor!at$on

    state!ent $n that *ase and that he does not no? ?ho had g$;en the f$rst $nfor!at$on

    state!ent $n that *ase.

    13=. EDt.59 $s the *ert$f$ed *o"y of the A..& $n *r$!e no.2012 of

    Eda*herry o#$*e Stat$on reg$stered under se*t$ons 143, 14=, 148, 324, 452, 30= and

    42= read ?$th 149 ... Th$s *ase re#ates to the atta* !ade on +a#an, the 'rother of

    2. The f$rst $nfor!at$on state!ent atta*hed to EDt.59 A..& sho?s that the *ase

    ?as reg$stered on the 'as$s of the state!ent g$;en to the "o#$*e at the hos"$ta# 'y the

    ?$fe of +a#an $n the "resen*e of 2. et, 2 has eD"ressed $gnoran*e a'out $t. The

    $n*$dent !ent$oned $n EDt.59 A..& ?as on 21.02.2012.

    138. EDt. 59 A..& ?ou#d sho? that the f$rst a**used $n that *ase

    $s .. &a!a*handran ?ho $s a**used no.8 $n the "resent *ase. 7d!$tted#y,

    .. &a!a!*handran (78) $s a #o*a# #eader of ..(M).

    139. n the aforesa$d *$r*u!stan*es, $t *annot 'e found that 2 $s a tota##y

    d$s$nterested and $nde"endent ?$tness.

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    72/420

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    73/420

    dr$;$ng the *ar and 2 ga;e ans?er $n the aff$r!at$;e. 2 a#so $dent$f$ed the

    a**used 7noo" (71) $n the *ourt stat$ng that he ?as the dr$;er of the *ar. +ut 2 had

    not stated to the "o#$*e that he had seen the dr$;er of the *ar and that he *ou#d $dent$fy

    h$!. 2 ?ou#d say that on 22.0.2012, at the *a!" off$*e of S..T, he had "o$nted out

    to the "o#$*e the dr$;er of the *ar.

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    74/420

    dou't a'out the truthfu#ness or *red$t?orth$ness of the ?$tness, h$s e;$den*e

    'e*o!es una**e"ta'#e. Then $t ?$## not 'e safe to re#y u"on su*h e;$den*e. Ser$ous

    *ontrad$*t$ons and o!$ss$ons ?h$*h !ater$a##y affe*t the su'stratu! of the "rose*ut$on

    *ase ha;e to 'e understood $n *#ear *ontrad$st$n*t$on to !ere !arg$na# ;ar$at$ons $n the

    state!ent of the ?$tnesses.

    144. h$#e a""re*$at$ng the e;$den*e, the *ourt has to tae $nto *ons$derat$on

    ?hether the *ontrad$*t$onso!$ss$ons are of su*h !agn$tude that they !ay !ater$a##y

    affe*t the *red$t?orth$ness of the ?$tness. n ter!s of the eD"#anat$on to se*t$on 12

    r... ?h$*h dea#s ?$th an o!$ss$on to state a fa*t or *$r*u!stan*e $n the state!ent

    g$;en to the "o#$*e 'y a ?$tness, su*h o!$ss$on !ay a!ount to *ontrad$*t$on $f the sa!e

    a""ears to 'e s$gn$f$*ant and other?$se re#e;ant ha;$ng regard to the *onteDt $n ?h$*h

    su*h o!$ss$on o**urs and ?hether there $s any o!$ss$on ?h$*h a!ounts to *ontrad$*t$on

    $n a "art$*u#ar *onteDt sha## 'e a uest$on of fa*t. f a s$gn$f$*ant o!$ss$on $s !ade $n the

    state!ent of a ?$tness under se*t$on 11 r.., the sa!e !ay a!ount to *ontrad$*t$on.

    here the o!$ss$on a!ounts to a *ontrad$*t$on, *reat$ng a ser$ous dou't a'out the

    truthfu#ness of a ?$tness, $t ?ou#d not 'e safe to re#y u"on su*h e;$den*e. Mere

    !arg$na# ;ar$at$ons $n the state!ents *annot 'e du''ed as $!"ro;e!ents as the sa!e

    !ay 'e e#a'orat$ons of the state!ent !ade 'y the ?$tness ear#$er. +ut, the o!$ss$ons

    ?h$*h a!ount to *ontrad$*t$ons $n !ater$a# "art$*u#ars ?h$*h go to the root of the *ase

    render the test$!ony of the ?$tness #$a'#e to 'e d$s*red$ted (Sun$# u!ar Sa!'hudaya#

    u"ta 6s. State of Maharashtra% 2010 7& S =049).

    145. The o!$ss$ons $n the state!ent of 2 ?h$*h a!ount to !ater$a#

    *ontrad$*t$ons d$s*red$t h$s test$!ony ?$th regard to the "art$*u#ars of the $n*$dent. 7t

    any rate, $n the #$ght of the *ontrad$*t$ons !ent$oned a'o;e, $t $s not safe to re#y u"on h$s

    74

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    75/420

    test$!ony regard$ng the $n*$dent, es"e*$a##y $n ;$e? of the f$nd$ng that he $s a "art$san

    ?$tness. >&e;o#ut$onary outh>> $s

    the na!e of the youth ?$ng of &.M.. 3 used to attend the !eet$ngs of

    75

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    76/420

    >>&e;o#ut$onary outh>>. -e $s a red ;o#unteer of &.M.. -e ?as one of the &ed

    6o#unteers ?ho had he#d the dead 'ody of T..handraseharan ?hen $t ?as 'rought to

    the To?n -a##, oh$ode. +efore 'e$ng a !e!'er of &.M., 3 ?as a ?orer of

    ..(M).

    150. 3 has ad!$tted that he had *ontested the an*hayath e#e*t$on fro!

    ard o.19 of horode an*hayath.

    151. EDt.3 $s the *ert$f$ed *o"y of the f$na# re"ort (*harge sheet) f$#ed 'y the

    "o#$*e $n *r$!e no.1=12 of 6ataara "o#$*e stat$on. EDt.4 $s the *o"y of the f$rst

    $nfor!at$on state!ent g$;en to the "o#$*e 'y one &asheed, a ?orer of &.M., the

    "erson ?ho ?as $nured $n the $n*$dent and EDt.1 $s the *o"y of the !e!orandu! of

    e;$den*e (#$st of ?$tnesses) $n that *ase. The a##egat$on $n that *ase $s that the a**used

    there$n ?ho ?ere ?orers of .. (M) had atta*ed and !ade atte!"t to *ause death of

    &asheed due to "o#$t$*a# an$!os$ty. EDt.1 sho?s that 3 has 'een *$ted as an eye/

    ?$tness $n that *ase.

    152. EDt.5 $s the *ert$f$ed *o"y of the A..& $n *r$!e no.12=508 of 6ataara

    "o#$*e stat$on. EDt.2 $s the *o"y of the !e!orandu! of e;$den*e (#$st of ?$tnesses) $n

    that *ase. The a##egat$on $n that *ase $s that the a**used there$n ?ho ?ere ?orers of

    .. (M) had atta*ed and *aused gr$e;ous $nury to one S$neesh, a ?orer of &.M..

    EDt.2 sho?s that 3 has 'een *$ted as a s*ene !ahaar ?$tness $n that *ase.

    153. n the aforesa$d *$r*u!stan*es, $t *annot 'e found that 3 $s a tota##y

    d$s$nterested and $nde"endent ?$tness.

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    77/420

    does not !ean that h$s e;$den*e has to 'e ree*ted . The *ourt has to ?e$gh su*h

    e;$den*e *arefu##y. The *ourt has to assess the $ntr$ns$* ?orth of the e;$den*e after

    s*rut$ny of $t ?$th *are and *aut$on.

    ondu*t of 3 and e#ay $n &e*ord$ng -$s State!ent

    155. 3 had g$;en state!ent to the "o#$*e regard$ng the $n*$dent on#y on

    09.05.2012. -$s e;$den*e sho?s that he had gone to the Med$*a# o##ege -os"$ta#,

    oh$ode on the !orn$ng of 05.05.2012 and that he had a**o!"an$ed the dead 'ody

    of T..handraseharan as a &ed 6o#unteer. -$s e;$den*e $s that on 0.05.2012 he ?ent

    to the house of h$s s$ster near 6ataara and stayed there. -e $s a "erson ?or$ng as

    go#d a""ra$ser $n a 'an. -e ?ent to the 'an on 0=.05.2012 and 08.05.2012 fro! the

    house of h$s s$ster. -$s e;$den*e $s that on 09.05.2012 he ?ent to the off$*e of the

    y.S., 6ataara and ga;e state!ent regard$ng the $n*$dent. 3 has de"osed that $t

    ?as on a**ount of fear that he ?ent to the house of h$s s$ster and stayed there.

    15. 3 ?ou#d say that there ?as no hurd#e to go to the off$*e of the

    y.S., 6ataara on 0=.05.2012 and to g$;e state!ent 'ut he ?as s*ared. -e has

    stated that he d$d not te## the $n*$dent to any'ody or !ade "hone *a## to the "o#$*e

    'e*ause he ?as fr$ghtened. -e had !et !any &.M. ?orers ?hen he ?ent to

    oh$ode on 05.05.2012 'ut he d$d not te## any'ody that he had seen the $n*$dent. -e

    had gone to oh$ode $n a ee". &ed 6o#unteers of &.M. ?ere the "assengers of the

    ee". They ?ere $n un$for!. t ?as a #o*a# #eader of &.M. 'y na!e .M.&e$ ?ho had

    ased h$! to *o!e to oh$ode $n the un$for! of &ed 6o#unteer. -e d$d not te##

    .M.&e$ that he sa? the $n*$dent. 3 d$d not te## any of the! regard$ng the $n*$dent.

    +efore g$;$ng state!ent to the "o#$*e, he d$d not te## any #eader or ?orer of &.M.

    regard$ng the $n*$dent.

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    78/420

    ;o#untar$#y ?ent to the off$*e of the y.S., 6ataara.

    15=. n 7*hara"ara!'ath radee"an 6s State of era#a % 200= (1) BT 249

    (S), the -onG'#e Su"re!e ourt has o'ser;ed as fo##o?s%

    He a#though a""re*$ate that $n a *ase of th$s nature the ?$tnesses !ust gather

    *ourage o;er a "er$od of t$!e to *o!e out ?$th the$r "art of story 'ut ?e are not ;ery

    sure that the sa!e standard shou#d 'e a""#$ed to s = and 8. They ?ere !e!'ers of

    a "o#$t$*a# "arty. = ?as a sy!"ath$er of the +harat$ya Janata arty. -e *a!e to #earn

    a'out the $n*$dent on the sa!e day at a'out noon. -e e;en ?ent to the house of the

    de*eased. o#$*e off$*ers ?ere "resent there. -e !ust ha;e ta#ed to others that the

    a**used "ersons *o!!$tted the !urder 'ut st$## he had not o"ened h$s !outh.GG

    158. n the "resent *ase, regard$ng the non/d$s*#osure of the $n*$dent for four

    days after the !urder, the standard a""#$ed to the *ondu*t of 1 *annot 'e a""#$ed to

    3. The *ondu*t of 3 stands on a d$fferent foot$ng. -e $s a staun*h su""orter of

    &.M.. The "erson !urdered ?as h$s #eader. 3 ?as a !e!'er of F&e;o#ut$onary

    outhG, the youth ?$ng of &.M.. -e ?as a &ed 6o#unteer of that "arty. -e had

    a**o!"an$ed the dead 'ody of T..handraseharan $n the un$for! of &ed 6o#unteer.

    -$s test$!ony that he ?as s*ared and therefore he d$d not te## the "o#$*e and any other

    "erson a'out the $n*$dent for four days on a**ount of fear *annot 'e a**e"ted as

    "#aus$'#e and *on;$n*$ng eD"#anat$on for the de#ay. t *annot 'e 'e#$e;ed that though he

    ?as a !e!'er of F&e;o#ut$onary outhG, the youth ?$ng of &.M.. and a &ed 6o#unteer

    of that "arty, he d$d not get *ourage to d$;u#ge the $n*$dent to any'ody, e;en to the

    #eaders of &.M. ?$th ?ho! he had o**as$on to *o!e $nto *onta*t on 05.05.2012. The

    "r$n*$"#e that there *annot 'e un$for!$ty $n hu!an rea*t$on has to 'e *erta$n#y e"t $n

    !$nd. +ut, ?hen the *ondu*t of the ?$tness $s so unnatura# and $s not $n a**ord ?$th

    78

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    79/420

    a**e"ta'#e hu!an 'eha;$our a##o?$ng ;ar$at$ons, then h$s test$!ony 'e*o!es

    uest$ona'#e (Bahu a!a#aar at$# 6s State of Maharashtra % ( 2013 ) S 41=).

    &e#$a'$#$ty of the Test$!ony of 3

    159. S*rut$ny of the e;$den*e of 3 ?$th *are and *aut$on, es"e*$a##y $n

    ;$e? of the fa*t that he $s a "art$san ?$tness and that there ?as undue de#ay $n

    d$s*#os$ng the $n*$dent to the "o#$*e or any other "erson, re;ea#s ;$ta# and *ru*$a#

    o!$ss$ons and $n*ons$sten*$es $n h$s test$!ony ?$th regard to the $n*$dent of !urder. 7s

    $n the *ase of 2, he had not stated to the "o#$*e that any "erson ?ho u!"ed out of

    the *ar on the se*ond o**as$on had atta*ed the ;$*t$!. -e has re$terated $n the *ross/

    eDa!$nat$on that he sa? f$;e "ersons *ho""$ng the ;$*t$!. 3 has de"osed 'efore the

    *ourt that so!eth$ng ?as ?r$tten $n 7ra'$* #etters on the front and the rear g#asses of the

    *ar. -e had not stated to the "o#$*e these fa*ts. -e has de"osed that the dr$;er of the

    *ar d$d not get out of $t. -e had no o""ortun$ty to see the dr$;er of the *ar. 3 $dent$f$ed

    the a**used 7noo" (71) $n the *ourt on#y as one of the "ersons $n;o#;ed $n the $n*$dent.

    -e d$d not $dent$fy h$! $n the *ourt as the dr$;er of the *ar. The e;$den*e of 3 sho?s

    that e;en dur$ng the $n;est$gat$on of the *ase he had no o**as$on to $dent$fy the f$rst

    a**used as the dr$;er of the *ar. n eDa!$nat$on/$n/*h$ef 3 has on#y stated that on

    22.0.2012, at the off$*e of the S..T, he understood the na!e of 7noo" (71) and t?o

    other a**used. -e has not g$;en e;$den*e that he $dent$f$ed 7noo" (71) at the off$*e of

    the S..T as the dr$;er of the *ar or e;en as a "erson $n;o#;ed $n the $n*$dent. 3 had

    not stated to the "o#$*e that he had seen the dr$;er of the *ar and that he *ou#d $dent$fy

    h$!.

    10. The $n*ons$sten*$es and the o!$ss$ons referred to a'o;e $n the

    test$!ony of 3 *annot 'e $gnored as $rre#e;ant or $!!ater$a#. They a!ount to

    79

  • 8/10/2019 T.P. Chandrasekharan Onchiyam Murder Case Judgement

    80/420

    !ater$a# *ontrad$*t$ons *reat$ng a ser$ous dou't a'out the truthfu#ness and

    *red$t?orth$ness of the ?$tness and h$s e;$den*e 'e*o!es una**e"ta'#e. t $s not safe

    to re#y u"on h$s e;$den*e regard$ng the $n*$dent. The *ontrad$*t$onso!$ss$ons $n the

    test$!ony of 3 !ater$a##y affe*t h$s *red$t?orth$ness. -$s e;$den*e does not $ns"$re

    *onf$den*e.

    11. The fa*t that e;$den*e of 2 and 3 $s found to 'e not re#$a'#e does

    not !ean that the e;$de