1 Michael D. Fox RN, BSN Applying the NICHD Categories Case Studies In Fetal Monitoring II III I Normal Abnormal Indeterminate NICHD 2008 Three - Tier Fetal Heart Rate Interpretation System NICHD 2008 Three - Tier Fetal Heart Rate Interpretation System I NICHD 2008 NICHD 2008 “ “ “Normal ” ” ” Category I • Moderate Variability • FHR 110-160 bpm • No late or variable decelerations • ± ± ± early decelerations • ± ± ± accelerations Category I • Moderate Variability • FHR 110-160 bpm • No late or variable decelerations • ± ± ± early decelerations • ± ± ± accelerations NICHD 2008 NICHD 2008 Category III • Absent variability with recurrent: • Late decelerations • Variable decelerations • Bradycardia OR • Sinusoidal pattern Category III • Absent variability with recurrent: • Late decelerations • Variable decelerations • Bradycardia OR • Sinusoidal pattern “ “ “Abnormal” III
21
Embed
Three -Tier Fetal Heart Rate Interpretation Applying the ......Case Studies In Fetal Monitoring II III I Normal Abnormal Indeterminate NICHD 2008 Three -Tier Fetal Heart Rate Interpretation
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1
Michael D. Fox RN, BSN
Applying the NICHD Categories Case Studies In Fetal Monitoring II
Category I• Moderate Variability• FHR 110-160 bpm• No late or variable decelerations •±±±± early decelerations•±±±± accelerations
Category I• Moderate Variability• FHR 110-160 bpm• No late or variable decelerations •±±±± early decelerations•±±±± accelerations
NICHD 2008NICHD 2008Category III• Absent variability with recurrent:
• Late decelerations• Variable decelerations• Bradycardia OR• Sinusoidal pattern
Category III• Absent variability with recurrent:
• Late decelerations• Variable decelerations• Bradycardia OR• Sinusoidal pattern ““““Abnormal”III
2
NICHD 2008NICHD 2008
II““““Indeterminate””””
Category II Tracings
Everything else
Category II Tracings
Everything else
““““The Mess In the Middle””””““““The Mess In the Middle””””
II
III
I
““““Abnormal””””
Indeterminate
““““Normal””””
2008 NICHD 3 Tier System Fails To:
2008 NICHD 3 Tier System Fails To:
• Clearly identify the relationship between FHR patterns and significant acidemia.
• Clearly identify the relationship between FHR patterns and significant acidemia.
• Simplify and make clear the framework for determining the choice and timing of our interventions
• Simplify and make clear the framework for determining the choice and timing of our interventions
2008 NICHD 3 Tier System Fails To:
2008 NICHD 3 Tier System Fails To:
• Clearly identify the relationship between FHR patterns and significant acidemia.
• Clearly identify the relationship between FHR patterns and significant acidemia.
• Simplify and make clear the framework for determining the choice and timing of our interventions
• Simplify and make clear the framework for determining the choice and timing of our interventions
? Minimal FHR variability (with decelerations) should be considered as potentially indicative of fetal acidemia and should be managed accordingly.
Minimal FHR variability (with decelerations) should be considered as potentially indicative of fetal acidemia and should be managed accordingly.
Moderate FHR variability reliably predicts the absence of fetal metabolic acidemia at the time it is observed.Moderate FHR variability reliably predicts the absence of fetal metabolic acidemia at the time it is observed.
Absent FHR variability with decelerations… is abnormal and conveys an increased risk of fetal acidemia at the time it is observed.
Absent FHR variability with decelerations… is abnormal and conveys an increased risk of fetal acidemia at the time it is observed.
NONO
MaybeMaybe
PresumedPresumed
FHR Patterns and AcidemiaFHR Patterns and Acidemia
NICHD - ACOG Practice Bulletin #116 November 2010NICHD - ACOG Practice Bulletin #116 November 2010
Simplify the Framework3 Clinical Categories
Simplify the Framework3 Clinical Categories
3
Minimal FHR variability (with decelerations) should be considered as potentially indicative of fetal acidemia and should be managed accordingly.
Minimal FHR variability (with decelerations) should be considered as potentially indicative of fetal acidemia and should be managed accordingly.
Moderate FHR variability reliably predicts the absence of fetal metabolic acidemia at the time it is observed.Moderate FHR variability reliably predicts the absence of fetal metabolic acidemia at the time it is observed.
Absent FHR variability ((with decelerations…) is abnormal and conveys an increased risk of fetal acidemia at the time it is observed.
Absent FHR variability ((with decelerations…) is abnormal and conveys an increased risk of fetal acidemia at the time it is observed.
ACOG - AWOHNN - AACN Interpretive Principles
ACOG - AWOHNN - AACN Interpretive Principles
Factors Increase Likelihood for Significant Acidemia
Factors Increase Likelihood for Significant Acidemia
NICHD - ACOG Practice Bulletin #116 November 2010NICHD - ACOG Practice Bulletin #116 November 2010
• Recurrent… decelerations
• That progress to a greater depth and longer duration
• Are more indicative of impending fetal acidemia.NICHD 2010- ACOG Practice Bulletin #116 November 2010NICHD 2010- ACOG Practice Bulletin #116 November 2010
Evolution of Significant Acidemia? Evolution of Significant Acidemia?
Typical and observable changes associated with an increased risk for birth in the presence of a significant fetal acidemia?
Typical and observable changes associated with an increased risk for birth in the presence of a significant fetal acidemia?
1. Evolutionary loss of FHR variability
2. In association with recurrent decelerations and/or bradycardia
3. That get deeper over time
In Association Decelerations That Get Deeper Over Time
Moderate
Absent
Minimal
Pattern EvolutionEvolutionary loss of Variability
Moderate
AbsentMinimal
No No Maybe
Presumed PresumedMake a Presumptive Diagnosis of the FHR Patterns Relationship to Significant Acidemia
Based On the Degree of Variability Accompanies the Decelerations
Maybe
4
In a fetus with an initially normal FHR pattern the development of significant acidemia evolves over a period of time, of the order of at least one hour. (60 –
90 minutes)
In a fetus with an initially normal FHR pattern the development of significant acidemia evolves over a period of time, of the order of at least one hour. (60 –
90 minutes)
Estimated time to deliveryEstimated time to delivery
Local realities = Event to delivery time
Local realities = Event to delivery time
Choice and Timing of Interventions: Factors to Consider
Choice and Timing of Interventions: Factors to Consider
1 Hour Window of Opportunity ±±±±1 Hour Window of Opportunity ±±±±
Applying the NICHD Categories Case Studies In Fetal MonitoringApplying the NICHD Categories Case Studies In Fetal Monitoring
2006 - Fetal acidemia and electronic fetal heart rate patterns: Is there evidence of an association? J. T. Parer a;T. King a; S. Flanders a; M. Fox a; S. J. Kilpatrick b The Journal of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Volume 19, Issue 5 May 2006
2006 - Fetal acidemia and electronic fetal heart rate patterns: Is there evidence of an association? J. T. Parer a;T. King a; S. Flanders a; M. Fox a; S. J. Kilpatrick b The Journal of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Volume 19, Issue 5 May 2006
Moderate FHR variability reliably predicts the absence of fetal metabolic acidemia at the time it is observed.Moderate FHR variability reliably predicts the absence of fetal metabolic acidemia at the time it is observed.2008 NICHD Report EFM JOGNN, 37, 1-6; 2008. 2008 NICHD Report EFM JOGNN, 37, 1-6; 2008.
• 98% of the fetuses with moderate FHR variability, with or without decelerations or second stage bradycardia will be born in the absence of a significant metabolic acidemia, and/or in the presence of neonatal vigor.
•When moderate FHR variability is present at the time of birth < 1% of neonates will be born with an Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes.
• 98% of the fetuses with moderate FHR variability, with or without decelerations or second stage bradycardia will be born in the absence of a significant metabolic acidemia, and/or in the presence of neonatal vigor.
•When moderate FHR variability is present at the time of birth < 1% of neonates will be born with an Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes.
CASE 2CASE 2
Applying the NICHD Categories Case Studies In Fetal MonitoringApplying the NICHD Categories Case Studies In Fetal Monitoring
22:3022:30 02 and IV increased 02 and IV increased 22:5822:58
13
23:1023:10 23:2023:20
23:30 SVE 3/90%23:30 SVE 3/90% 23:4023:40
14
Category ☐☐☐☐ I ☐☐☐☐ II ☐☐☐☐ IIICategory ☐☐☐☐ I ☐☐☐☐ II ☐☐☐☐ III
Significant Acidemia Yes ☐☐☐☐ NO ☐☐☐☐ Maybe ☐☐☐☐Significant Acidemia Yes ☐☐☐☐ NO ☐☐☐☐ Maybe ☐☐☐☐
XX XX
XX XX
23:4623:46 23:5023:50
15
24:00 SVE 4 cm – plan C/S24:00 SVE 4 cm – plan C/S 00:03 SQ Terbutaline00:03 SQ Terbutaline To ORTo OR
00:09 Positioned for spinal 00:2000:20 00:28 delivery00:28 delivery
16
17
18
19
Is this tracing associated with Significant Acidosis?
Y e s N o
M ay b e
12%
41%47%
A. YesB. NoC. Maybe
A. YesB. NoC. Maybe
• C/S for ““““fetal distress. ””””
• 1900 gm. Female • APGARS 5/8.
• C/S for ““““fetal distress. ””””
• 1900 gm. Female • APGARS 5/8.
Birth OutcomeBirth Outcome
Cord GasesCUA:7.17/62/9/-8CUV:7.22/52/16/-7
Cord GasesCUA:7.17/62/9/-8CUV:7.22/52/16/-7
20
(23:40 – 00:03) - 23 minutes minimal variability + recurrent late decelerations(some deep – 60
beats below baseline)
(23:40 – 00:03) - 23 minutes minimal variability + recurrent late decelerations(some deep – 60
beats below baseline)
Local realities = in house surgical team immediate C/S capabilities
Local realities = in house surgical team immediate C/S capabilities
Timing of Interventions: Factors to Consider Timing of Interventions: Factors to Consider
1 Hour Window of Opportunity ±±±±1 Hour Window of Opportunity ±±±±
Estimated time to delivery – presumption remote delivery- 4 cm
Estimated time to delivery – presumption remote delivery- 4 cm
00:03 Restoration of moderate FHR variability immediately before delivery
00:03 Restoration of moderate FHR variability immediately before delivery
SummationSummation
1. FHR decelerations as an independent finding are poorly predictive of complicated outcomes.
1. FHR decelerations as an independent finding are poorly predictive of complicated outcomes.
2. The degree of variability is the most sensitive indicator of the adequacy of oxygen delivery to the fetus at any given moment in time.
2. The degree of variability is the most sensitive indicator of the adequacy of oxygen delivery to the fetus at any given moment in time.
4. A metabolic acidemia typically develops slowly in association with recurrent decelerations and an evolutionary reduction of FHR variability over time.
4. A metabolic acidemia typically develops slowly in association with recurrent decelerations and an evolutionary reduction of FHR variability over time.
3. The deeper the decelerations the > likelihood for developing a significant acidemia.
3. The deeper the decelerations the > likelihood for developing a significant acidemia.
Fetal acidemia and electronic fetal heart rate patt erns: Is there evidence of an association? J. T.
PARER1, T. KING1, S. FLANDERS1, M. FOX1, & S. J. KI LPATRICK2
Evidence Based Indications For ActionBased on the degree of variability that accompanies the decelerations
MAYBE?
Make a presumptive Diagnosis
YES?NO?
Significant acidemia?
21
� Continuous Observation� Notification� Bedside Evaluation� Prepare for birth� Expedite Birth� Prepare For Neonatal Resuscitation� Prepare to Transfer/Transport
� Continuous Observation� Notification� Bedside Evaluation� Prepare for birth� Expedite Birth� Prepare For Neonatal Resuscitation� Prepare to Transfer/Transport
IntrauterineResuscitation In a fetus with an initially normal FHR pattern
the development of significant acidemia evolves over a period of time, of the order of at
least one hour. (60 – 90 minutes)
In a fetus with an initially normal FHR pattern the development of significant acidemia
evolves over a period of time, of the order of at least one hour. (60 – 90 minutes)
Estimated time to deliveryEstimated time to delivery
Local realities = Event to delivery time
Local realities = Event to delivery time
Timing of Interventions: Factors to Consider Timing of Interventions: Factors to Consider
1 Hour Window of Opportunity ±±±±1 Hour Window of Opportunity ±±±±
Minimal FHR variability (with decelerations) should be considered as potentially indicative of fetal acidemia and should be managed accordingly.
Minimal FHR variability (with decelerations) should be considered as potentially indicative of fetal acidemia and should be managed accordingly.
Moderate FHR variability reliably predicts the absence of fetal metabolic acidemia at the time it is observed.
Moderate FHR variability reliably predicts the absence of fetal metabolic acidemia at the time it is observed.
Absent FHR variability with decelerations… is abnormal and conveys an increased risk of fetal acidemia at the time it is observed.
Absent FHR variability with decelerations… is abnormal and conveys an increased risk of fetal acidemia at the time it is observed.
NONO
MaybeMaybe
PresumedPresumed
Interpretive PrinciplesInterpretive Principles
I
II
III
Relationship AcidemiaRelationship AcidemiaExample: 3 – Tiered System that Integrated Patterns Presumed Relationship Acidemia with the CategoriesExample: 3 – Tiered System that Integrated Patterns Presumed Relationship Acidemia with the Categories
II
III
I
““““Abnormal””””
Indeterminate
““““Normal””””
Integrated 3 Tier SystemIntegrated 3 Tier System• More clearly identify the relationship between FHR patterns and significant acidemia.
• More clearly identify the relationship between FHR patterns and significant acidemia.
•Better clarify how our presumptive diagnosis informs the choice and timing of our interventions.
•Better clarify how our presumptive diagnosis informs the choice and timing of our interventions.