The Tension between Student Persistence and Institutional Retention: An Examination of the Relationship between First-Semester GPA and Student Progression Rates of First- Time Students (Session 529) Braden J. Hosch, Ph.D. Director of Institutional Research & Assessment Central Connecticut State University, New Britain, CT [email protected]Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum Seattle, WA May 26, 2008 This presentation is online at http://www.ccsu.edu/oira/research
24
Embed
The Tension between Student Persistence and Institutional Retention: An Examination of the Relationship between First- Semester GPA and Student Progression.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
The Tension between Student Persistence and Institutional Retention: An Examination of the Relationship between First-Semester GPA and Student Progression Rates of First-Time Students (Session 529)
Braden J. Hosch, Ph.D.Director of Institutional Research & Assessment
Central Connecticut State University, New Britain, [email protected]
Association for Institutional Research Annual ForumSeattle, WA
May 26, 2008
This presentation is online at http://www.ccsu.edu/oira/research
The Relationship Between First-Semester GPA and Graduation and Retention Rates of Full-Time, First-Time Students (And two brief caveats)
The National Picture – Data from CSRDE
Case Study – Central Connecticut State U.
Conclusions and Implications
Major Findings
First-semester grade point average of full-time first-time students is: very predictive of graduation and retention rates this relationship is underreported
Implications Students who perform well stay and graduate,
students who do not perform well tend to depart Corollary: students get out of their education what
they put into it
Caveats
GPA is not just about academic performance, but also encompasses factors such as Preparation Effort Commitment Emotional adjustment Social integration Financial stability Etc.
Institutions should not be let off the hook for improving: Instructional quality Integration of co-
curricular activities Student contact with
faculty and staff Ineffective policies
and procedures
CSRDE Study
Consortium for the Study of Retention Data Exchange (CSRDE) collects institution-reported data about progress and graduation rates of full-time, first-time students
Data for cohort entering in 2000 published in 2007.
Institutions with incomplete data excluded Institutions reporting <3% of entering cohort
earning first semester GPA<2.0 excluded
CSRDE Institutions Included in Study Population
ControlInstitutional Type Private (N) Public (N) Total (N) % of Total
Error bars represent +/- one standard deviationSource: 2006-07 CSRDE Retention Report
Scatterplot of Institutions and Retention Rates
N = 315 institutions, DF= 2, SSE = 1.76, SE = 0.075, p < 0.001; Excludes institutions reporting less than 3% of the full-time, first-time cohort earned a first semester GPA below 2.0, on the basis that these institutions are not representative of most post-secondary institutions. Data source (CSRDE, 2007)
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%
First Semester GPA Below 2.0
50%
55%
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
RetnRateControl
PrivatePublic
ControlPrivatePublic
RetnRate = 0.858 - 0.575*Below2.0R2 = 0.255
Scatterplot of Institutions and Graduation Rates
N = 315 institutions, DF= 2, SSE = 5.16, SE = 0.128763, p < 0.001. Excludes institutions reporting less than 3% of the full-time, first-time cohort earned a first semester GPA below 2.0, on the basis that these institutions are not representative of most post-secondary institutions. Data source (CSRDE, 2007)
Percent of cohort with first semester GPA < 2.0 -1.141 0.095 -12.05 ***
Multivariate Regression Models
institutional control was not significant for graduation rates in a stepwise regression* Significant at p<0.05; *** Significant at p<0.001
Institutional One-Year Retention Rate (Adj. R2=0.367) β S.E. t Sig.Constant 0.872 0.012 73.29 ***Percent of cohort with first semester GPA < 2.0 -0.576 0.055 -10.41 ***Baccalaureate institution -0.073 0.014 -5.36 ***Master’s institution -0.044 0.009 -5.10 ***Public control 0.022 0.010 2.17 *
Institutional Six-Year Graduation Rate (Adj. R2=0.380) β S.E. t Sig.Constant 0.758 0.019 40.65 ***Percent of cohort with first semester GPA < 2.0 -1.085 0.091 -11.97 ***Master’s institution -0.079 0.015 -5.54 ***Baccalaureate institution -0.097 0.023 -4.18 ***
Institutional Profile: Central Connecticut State University Public – part of Connecticut State Univ. System Carnegie 2005 Master’s-Larger Programs New Britain, CT (Hartford MSA) Fall 2007 Enrollment:
Consider student engagement, especially time spent on academics
10 hours or less 11-20 hours per week
21 hours per week or more
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
45%35%
20%
Hrs per 7-day week FY students report preparing for class (s-tudying, reading, writing, doing homework or lab work, analyz-
ing data, rehearsing, and other academic activities),
Source: NSSE National Results, 2007
Implications and Conclusions (4)
Grade inflation Reassure faculty they are not being asked to
grade differently, but instead to develop ways to prompt students to learn more effectively
Nevertheless, grade inflation is a possibility:
Public 4-year Private nonprofit 4-year All private for-profit0%
10%20%30%40%50%
10.9% 16.7%27.8%11.2%
15.5%
17.5%
Undergraduate Grade Point Averages by Institution Type
A's and B'sMostly A's
Institution Type
Source: NCES (2007), National Postsecondary Student Aid Study 2003-04
Implications and Conclusions (5)
Reframe the national debate: Balance notions of retention (institution’s
responsibility) with persistence (student’s responsibility)
Student success (i.e. program completion) requires a partnership among students, institutions, and policymakers
The Tension between Student Persistence and Institutional Retention: An Examination of the Relationship between First-Semester GPA and Student Progression Rates of First-Time Students (Session 529)
Braden J. Hosch, Ph.D.Director of Institutional Research & Assessment
Central Connecticut State University, New Britain, [email protected]
Association for Institutional Research Annual ForumSeattle, WA
May 26, 2008
This presentation is online at http://www.ccsu.edu/oira/research