The Sale of ‘Open Content’ Recognizing and Negotiating Philosophical Quandaries in the OER Definition lin Moe, EdD sistant Professor rector of Educational Technology & Media attle Pacific University Twitter - @rmoejo http://rolinmoe.org Paper – In Review Slides - http://bit.ly/ 1Ngw5 First image by Cable Green (CC BY 2.0), Second & Third by Rolin Moe (a postmodern
13
Embed
The Sale of 'Open Content' - Recognizing & Negotiating the Philosophical Quandaries of the OER Movement
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
The Sale of ‘Open Content’
Recognizing and Negotiating Philosophical Quandaries in the OER DefinitionRolin Moe, EdD
Assistant ProfessorDirector of Educational Technology & MediaSeattle Pacific University
Twitter - @rmoejohttp://rolinmoe.orgPaper – In ReviewSlides - http://bit.ly/1Ngw5ir
First image by Cable Green (CC BY 2.0), Second & Third by Rolin Moe (a postmodern whatevs)
Openwashing is a phenomenon. It will not be solved by pragmatism alone.
In fact, pragmatism may be part of the conundrum behind openwashing.
Three Minutes of Theory
Hegel
Absolute Knowledge *Scientific advancement
will lead us to a totality of all knowledge – ‘abstract-negative-
concrete’ triad
Marx
Emancipation*Scientific advancement
will lead us to access and equity for all humans
Dewey
Pragmatic Reform*Social
science advancement
is grounded in practice, which can lead us to
the potentials of Democracy
LyotardParaphrasing The Postmodern Condition
The fallacy of scientific knowledge is that it requires proof as well as an ability to refute opposition, which does not result in Truth but rather a likeliness of truth based on our strata of information. Moreover, scientific knowledge is a sender-receiver relationship, a one-sided competence rather than a social bond.
If we take connectivism and social constructivism as learning theories resulting from the ubiquity of knowledge networks (i.e., information society), we must recognize narrative knowledge to be legitimate – not better, worse, or the same as scientific knowledge. We must also recognize the biases and assumptions of scientific knowledge in same way we do narrative knowledge.
Lyotard, Les Immateriaux. 1985
The Buried Hatch Cover by Alan Levine CC BY 2.0
The Content Paradox
Why not just change the name?Labeling the problem as semantic assumes absolute knowledge, as if there is a True term that will not be laden in two-way discourses and the subsequent complexity.
“Open content” was and is an attempt to appropriately adapt the logic of “open source” software to the non-software world of cultural and scientific artifacts like music, literature, and images.
- David Wiley, “Defining Open,” 2009
OERTextbooks!
Emancipation&
Democracy!
This two-dimensional construct in no way suggests an ideal reality.
Conclusion
Generally speaking, while the choice by open content publishers to use licenses that include requirements and restrictions can optimize their ability to accomplish their own local goals, the choice typically harms the global goals of the broader open content community.
- Defining the ‘Open’ in ‘Open Content’ at http://www.opencontent.org