Top Banner
Andrew J. Mallon IBA Seminar, May 17, 2012 Ethical Quandaries For Government Attorneys
18

Andrew J. Mallon IBA Seminar, May 17, 2012 Ethical Quandaries For Government Attorneys.

Dec 27, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Andrew J. Mallon IBA Seminar, May 17, 2012 Ethical Quandaries For Government Attorneys.

Andrew J. MallonIBA Seminar, May 17, 2012

Ethical Quandaries For Government

Attorneys

Page 2: Andrew J. Mallon IBA Seminar, May 17, 2012 Ethical Quandaries For Government Attorneys.

Introduction:

Role of the Government Lawyer The Government Client

“Who’s the Client?” Whose Privilege is it? Who can speak for whom?

Participation in Political Activities The Political Attorney Campaign Misconduct

“Pay to Play”

2

Page 3: Andrew J. Mallon IBA Seminar, May 17, 2012 Ethical Quandaries For Government Attorneys.

Role of Government Lawyer

Rule 2.1 Advisor: “In rendering advice, a lawyer may refer not only to law but to other considerations such as moral, economic, social and political factors, that may be relevant to the client's situation.

Rule 3 Advocate Note: Rule 3.6 Trial Publicity- discourages

extrajudicial statements to be publicly communicated that “will have a substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing an adjudicative proceeding in the matter.” But . . .

3

Page 4: Andrew J. Mallon IBA Seminar, May 17, 2012 Ethical Quandaries For Government Attorneys.

The Government Client

Duty of Confidentiality v. Evidentiary privilege

Who is the “client”? Who holds a privilege is it? Who speaks or acts for client?

Page 5: Andrew J. Mallon IBA Seminar, May 17, 2012 Ethical Quandaries For Government Attorneys.

The Government Client

Indiana Rule 1.13, Entity as Client Key terms:

“authorized constituents” “higher/highest authority”

Comment 9:“The duty defined in this Rule applies to governmental organizations. . . Although in some circumstances the client may be a specific agency, it may also be a branch of government, such as the executive branch, or the government as a whole. For example, if the action or failure to act involves the head of a bureau, either the department of which the bureau is a part or the relevant branch of government may be the client for purposes of this Rule.”

Page 6: Andrew J. Mallon IBA Seminar, May 17, 2012 Ethical Quandaries For Government Attorneys.

Rule 1.4 Lawyer’s Duty of Communication

(a) A lawyer shall:(1) promptly inform the client of any decision or circumstance with respect to which the client's informed consent, as defined in Rule 1.0(e), is required by these Rules; (2) reasonably consult with the client about the means by which the client's objectives are to be accomplished; (3) keep the client reasonably informed about the status of the matter; (4) promptly comply with reasonable requests for information; and (5) consult with the client about any relevant limitation on the lawyer's conduct when the lawyer knows that the client expects assistance not permitted by the Rules of Professional Conduct or other law or assistance limited under Rule 1.2(c).

(b) A lawyer shall explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed decisions regarding the representation.

6

Page 7: Andrew J. Mallon IBA Seminar, May 17, 2012 Ethical Quandaries For Government Attorneys.

Rule 1.6 Lawyer’s Duty of Confidentiality

(a)    A lawyer shall not reveal information relating to representation of a client unless the client gives informed consent, the disclosure is impliedly authorized in order to carry out the representation or the disclosure is permitted by paragraph (b).

7

Page 8: Andrew J. Mallon IBA Seminar, May 17, 2012 Ethical Quandaries For Government Attorneys.

Circuits Split Over Government Attorney/Client Privilege 8th Circuit- In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces

Tecum, 112 F.3d 910 (1997) D.C. Circuit- In re Bruce Lindsey,158 F.3d 1263

(1998) 7th Circuit- In re Witness Before the Special Grand

Jury, 288 F.3d 289 (2002) 2nd Circuit- In re Grand Jury Investigation (Doe),

399 F.3d527 (2005)

8

Page 9: Andrew J. Mallon IBA Seminar, May 17, 2012 Ethical Quandaries For Government Attorneys.

Who is the Client?9

Rule 1.13 “Higher Authority” and “Control Group”

Page 10: Andrew J. Mallon IBA Seminar, May 17, 2012 Ethical Quandaries For Government Attorneys.

Who’s the Client (Cont’d)10

Highest Authority- Generally, majority vote of body Board only acts through votes/approved

minutes Majority hold’s privilege

Higher Authority- know hierarchy of constituents

Page 11: Andrew J. Mallon IBA Seminar, May 17, 2012 Ethical Quandaries For Government Attorneys.

Note: Post-representation Privacy Indiana Rule of Professional Conduct 1.11

(c):“…, a lawyer having information that the lawyer knows is confidential government information about a person acquired when the lawyer was a public officer or employee, may not represent a private client whose interests are adverse to that person in a matter in which the information could be used to the material disadvantage of that person.” (Emphasis added).

11

Page 12: Andrew J. Mallon IBA Seminar, May 17, 2012 Ethical Quandaries For Government Attorneys.

Ethical Political Participation

Page 13: Andrew J. Mallon IBA Seminar, May 17, 2012 Ethical Quandaries For Government Attorneys.

Political Lawyer

Rule 1.2 (b) A lawyer's representation of a client, including representation by appointment, does not constitute an endorsement of the client's political, economic, social or moral views or activities.

BUT, . . . Rule 2.1 Advisor: “In rendering advice, a

lawyer may refer not only to law but to other considerations such as moral, economic, social and political factors, that may be relevant to the client's situation.”

13

Page 14: Andrew J. Mallon IBA Seminar, May 17, 2012 Ethical Quandaries For Government Attorneys.

Ind. Prof. Cond. Rule 8.4

It is professional misconduct for a lawyer to: . . .(b) commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects;(c) engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation;(d) engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice;

14

Page 15: Andrew J. Mallon IBA Seminar, May 17, 2012 Ethical Quandaries For Government Attorneys.

Ind. Prof. Cond. Rule 8.2

(a) A lawyer shall not make a statement that the lawyer knows to be false or with reckless disregard as to its truth or falsity concerning the qualifications or integrity of a judge, adjudicatory officer or public legal officer, or of a candidate for election or appointment to judicial or legal office.

15

Page 16: Andrew J. Mallon IBA Seminar, May 17, 2012 Ethical Quandaries For Government Attorneys.

“Pay to Play”16

Page 17: Andrew J. Mallon IBA Seminar, May 17, 2012 Ethical Quandaries For Government Attorneys.

PayToPlay

Legal services contract in exchange for political campaign contribution. No bid legal services contracts. I.C. 5-22-6-1 Unlimited contributions by individuals,

partnerships, LLPs, LLCs, etc. I.C. 3-9-2-3 through 3-9-2-5.

Preemption of local pay-to-play ordinances Offenses Against Public Administration:

Bribery. I.C. 35-44-1-1. ABA Model Prof. Cond. Rule 7.6

17

Page 18: Andrew J. Mallon IBA Seminar, May 17, 2012 Ethical Quandaries For Government Attorneys.

Drewry Simmons Vornehm, LLPCarmel City Center736 Hanover Place, Suite 200Carmel, Indiana 46032317-580-4848www.dsvlaw.com

Thank You18