The Psychosemantic The Psychosemantic Approach to Approach to Personality Personality Shulamith Kreitler Department of Psychology Tel-Aviv University Tel-Aviv, Israel E-mail: [email protected]Budapest symposium on “The Many Faces of Personality”, May 13-15, 2002
57
Embed
The Psychosemantic Approach to Personality Shulamith Kreitler Department of Psychology Tel-Aviv University Tel-Aviv, Israel E-mail: [email protected].
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
The Psychosemantic The Psychosemantic Approach to PersonalityApproach to Personality
Budapest symposium on “The Many Faces of Personality”, May 13-15, 2002
The psychosemantic approach denotes a theory and methodology
based onanalyzing meaning assignment
tendencies of individualsand clarifying their role in regard to the
major components of personality: Traits
EmotionsCognitionBehavior
Structure of the talk:
A. Presentation of the meaning system
B. Meaning and personality traits
C. Meaning and emotions
D. Meaning and cognition
E. Meaning and behavior
F. General conclusions
A. Presentation of the meaning system
Developed by Kreitler and Kreitler, since 1968 onward
The System of Meaning(Kreitler & Kreitler)
Meaning is a cognitive concept.
It forms part of cognition.
It is the dynamic core of cognition.
Cognition is a system that works with meaning, namely, it responds to meanings, and produces, elaborates, stores, transforms and uses meanings.
Assumptions Underlying the Meaning System
Meaning is communicableMeaning is complex (multi-
component system)Meaning includes a personal-
subjective part and an interpersonally-shared part
Meaning is a pattern of cognitive contents focused on a referent.
A referent can be an external or internal stimulus, an object, a situation, an event, an individual, limited or extended, real, virtual or fantasized, etc.
The cognitive contents are designed to express or communicate information that would enable identifying the referent, handling it, responding to it, or dealing with it within the psychological domain.
The cognitive content and the referent form together the meaning unit.
Referent – Meaning Value
Examples: Budapest – is a wonderful cityAn airport – serves for transportationSymposium – brings people together
The cognitive content is called meaning value because it fulfills the role of expressing or communicating meaning.
The meaning unit is characterized in terms of the following 5 sets of variables:
Referent – Meaning Value
Shifts in Referent
Types of Relation
Forms of Relation
Forms of Expressio
n
Meaning Dimension
s
The psychosemantic method consists in coding the responses in terms of the following categories:
Meaning dimensions: Content categories, such as Feelings and Emotions, Actions, Sensory Qualities (color, shape, etc.), Size, Weight
Types of Relation: Relational categories, such as Attributive, Comparative, Illustrative-Exemplifying, Metaphoric-Symbolic.
Forms of Relation : Formative categories, such as Positive or Negative, Simple or Complex (e.g., Conjunctive, Disjunctive), Absolute or Modified (e.g., always, sometimes)
Shifts of Referent : Categories of shifts to other constructs, such as from Ocean to Lake, from House to Windows
Forms of Expression : Categories of means of expression, such as words, drawings, movements, denoted objects
Meaning Variables =Meaning Variables =
Meaning dimensionsand
Types of relationand
Forms of relationand
Shifts of referentand
Forms of expression
Examples of Meaning Variables
Meaning Dimensions Range of inclusion Material Function, Purpose & Role Feelings & Emotions Actions Possessions &
Types of Relation Attributive Comparative Exemplifying-illustrative Metaphoric-symbolic
Forms of Relation Positive, Negative Conjunctive, Disjunctive Normative
Referent Shifts Identical to input Part of input Association Opposite of input
Forms of Expression Verbal Gestural Graphic Tones & Sounds
Meaning TestInstructions: Communicate to another
person the meaning (interpersonally-shared and personal) of a presented set of stimuli, using any means of communication considered adequate, for example, words, drawings, movements, etc.
Stimuli: Street, Bicycle, Sea (ocean), to take, to kill, Telephone, etc.
Examples of Coded Responses
Stimulus: Budapest
Meaning Dimensions
Types of Relation
Forms of Relation
Shifts of Referent
Forms of Expression
A beautiful city
Contextual Allocation / Judgments & Evaluation
Attributive
Positive
NoneVerbal
More southern than Helsinki
Locational Qualities
Comparative
Positive
NoneVerbal
I love it’s center
Feelings & Emotions
Attributive
Positive
Part of (center)
Verbal
Meaning Profile
Frequencies (proportions) of individual’s use of each meaning variable in responding to the stimuli of the meaning test.
Applying the procedure to 280 personality traits showed thatEach personality trait Each personality trait corresponds to a unique corresponds to a unique pattern of meaning pattern of meaning variables.variables.
Patterns of meaning variables corresponding to different personality characteristics and tendencies were identified,for example, Leadership (Fiedler’s LPC) Alexithymia Tendency for different defense
mechanisms, e.g., denial, repression, projection
Narcissism The “good” manager
Meaning Profile of the “Good” Manager (based on the meaning variables common to the meaning profiles of 12 managers in different high-tech firms, evaluated by their peers and supervisors)
Meaning Dimensions Contextual allocation Function Manner of operation Consequences Causes (-) Domain of application State
Types of Relation Attributive Comparative: Difference Exemplifying (-) Metaphoric (-)
Forms of Relation Positive Partial (not universal) Conjunctive Disjunctive Normative Desired (-)
Referent Shifts Close shifts Medium shifts Distant shifts (-)
Meaning
Profile
Extraversion
Authoritorianism
Social desirability
Sociability
Depression
Paranoia
Uses of meaning patterns of traitsUses of meaning patterns of traits1.1. Assessment of personality traitsAssessment of personality traits
Each trait corresponds to a unique pattern of meaning variables
Step 1
Determine he patterns of meaning variables corresponding to the trait
Step 2
Determine the individual’s meaning profile by means of the Meaning Test
Step 3
Compare the traits pattern with the individual’s meaning profile. Comparison – by correlation or by counting shared components.
Shared componentsTrait’s score
0 – 20%Very weak
21 – 40%Weak
41 – 60%Moderate
61 – 80%Strong
81 – 100%Very strong
Validation studies:The scores of traits based on personality inventories and meaning-based traits were significantly intercorrelated:16 PF r = .76 – r = .83CPI r = .50 – r = .86
Myers-Brigs r = .69 – r = .84
The meaning profile of an individual provides information about the score of the individual on 300+300+ personality traits without administering any personality inventory.
Advantages: Increased reliability Reduced costs (time, resources) Increased information (about
personality trends, anti-traits)
2.2. Insight into the dynamics of a traitInsight into the dynamics of a trait Patterns of meaning variables corresponding to a
trait provide insight into the unique underlying dynamics of the trait.
For example,
Extraversion – Low arousal
Social desirability – Evaluation, not emotions.
3.3. Validating personality traitsValidating personality traits Validating-by-meaning is a new procedure of
validating traits.
It consists in examining the manifestations of traits in domains defined by the meaning variables in the pattern corresponding to the trait.
For example, extraversion and anality.
Advantages of this validation:
1. Broad-ranging
2. Theoretically-anchored
3. Comprehensive
4. Systematic
4.4. Comparing personality traitsComparing personality traits Patterns of meaning variables enable comparison
between traits based on analyzing shared meaning variables.
For example, “Cleanliness” and “punctuality”
r = .56 Shared: e.g., State, Quantity, Size
“Cleanliness” and “authoritarianism” r = .58 Shared: e.g., Evaluation, Cognitive qualities,
Structure, Metaphorization.
5.5. Identifying personality traitsIdentifying personality traits Formal properties of patterns of meaning variables
corresponding to traits:a) No. of meaning variables in the pattern: 13.8 ± 6.5b) No. of different kinds of meaning variables in the
pattern: 3 - 4c) Proportion of different kinds of meaning variables
in the pattern: Meaning dimensions 54.75% Types of relation 25.75% Forms of relation 5.90% Referent shifts 12.57%
d) Relative proportion of negative components in the pattern: .38
e) Proportion of meaning dimensions and types of relation in the pattern representing general variables: .44
Number of Significant Deviations
Conclusion
0 – 1Trait-identical
2 – 3Trait-similar
4 – 5Trait-dissimilar
Examples
Trait-identical Neuroticism, Narcissism
Trait-similar Alexithymia, Trait-anxiety
Trait-dissimilar MMPI scales
C. Meaning and Emotion
The tendency for each type of emotional reaction
corresponds to a pattern of meaning variables
ExamplePattern of meaning variables corresponding to anxiety (as assessed by 7 scales)Meaning DimensionsAction (-)Sensory qualitiesFeelings & emotions (experienced)Judgments & evaluationsCognitive qualitiesTypes of RelationAttributive (-)Metaphoric
D. Meaning and Cognition
Meaning Variables and Cognition
Cognitive contents, information
Meaning values
Cognitive processes
Meaning variables
Cognitive acts, structural schemas
Meaning profiles
Meaning
1. Meaning Values and Cognitive Contents
Meaning values correspond to cognitive contents and information.
Examples:
When the individual’s meaning profile shows a high frequency of the meaning dimension Locational Qualities, that individual may be expected to have a lot of labels, words, information in the domain of location, places, routes.
2. Meaning Values and Cognitive Processes
Cognitive processes correspond to specific meaning variables or combinations of meaning variables.
Examples:Shifting from one theme to another – High frequency of referent shifts of medium degree (e.g., shifting to previous response, or to superordinate referent)Associations – High number of meaning values (absolute and especially relative), high number of different shifts of referentAbstracting –High frequency of meaning dimension Contextual Allocation
3. Meaning Profiles and Cognitive Acts
Cognitive acts correspond to specific combinations of meaning variables that constitute complete profiles.
Meaning Profile of Planning Meaning Dimensions
Contextual allocation Range of inclusion Actions Manner of operation Antecedents & causes Consequences & results Range of application Structure Quantity & numbers Locational qualities Temporal qualities Sensory qualities (-) Judgments & evaluations
Types of Relation Attributive Metaphoric-symbolic (-)
Forms of Relation Propositional, positive &
negative Partial Conjunctive Disjunctive
Shifts of Referent Close shifts: Parts, Former
responses, Grammatical variations
Medium shifts: Input modified by addition, Combination of several former responses
Distant shifts (-) : Associations, Labels
Forms of Expression Verbal, Verbal description
of drawings
Further cognitive acts whose meaning profiles were identified:
Memory for verbal material / names / faces
Analogical thinking Inventive thinking Creativity Exploration and curiosity Various cognitive styles (e.g.,
impulsiveness vs. reflectivity, monitoring vs. blunting)
E. Meaning and Behavior
Contents and processes of meaning affect behavior only indirectlyindirectly and in multiple waysmultiple ways
The Cognitive Orientation Model of Behavior EvocationThe Cognitive Orientation Model of Behavior Evocation(Kreitler and Kreitler)(Kreitler and Kreitler)