Page 1
The Molecular Neurobiology and Human Genetics of Specific Addictive Diseases:
Implications for Treatments
Mary Jeanne Kreek, M.D.
Patrick E. and Beatrice M. Haggerty Professor
Head of Laboratory
The Laboratory of the Biology of Addictive Diseases
The Rockefeller University
Senior Physician,
The Rockefeller University Hospital
NYSAM
February 2, 2019
New York, NY
Funded primarily by NIH-NIDA (P60-05130), The Adelson Medical Research Foundation,
Robertson Therapeutic Development Fund, Tri-Institutional Therapeutics
Discovery Institute, NCATS-NIH-CTSA UL1-TR000043 (RUH – Dr B. Coller)
Page 2
I. “The Opioid Crisis” (2001 increasing through 2018);
early treatment research; current status and needs
II. Molecular neurobiology of addictive diseases:
current work on oxycodone effects in adult and
adolescent mice
III. Translational work to attempt to develop a potential
treatment for cocaine addiction and alcoholism:
focus on kappa opioid system
IV. Human molecular genetic studies related primarily
to opiate addiction, but also to cocaine addiction
and alcoholism
The Molecular Neurobiology and Human Genetics of Specific Addictive Diseases:
Implications for Treatments
Page 3
HYPOTHESIS: Heroin (opiate) addiction is a disease – a “metabolic disease” –
of the brain with resultant behaviors of “drug hunger” and drug self-
administration, despite negative consequences to self and others. Heroin
addiction is not simply a criminal behavior or due alone to antisocial
personality or some other personality disorder.
Initial Research on the Biology of Addictive Diseases at the Rockefeller University (then Institute), 1964: Development of a
Pharmacotherapy for Heroin Addiction
Dole, Nyswander and Kreek, 1964, 1966, 2018
First research paper describing methadone maintenance treatment research
1964: Initial clinical research on development of treatment using methadone
maintenance pharmacotherapy and on elucidating mechanisms of efficacy performed
at The Rockefeller Hospital of The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research:
Dole, V.P., Nyswander, M.E. and Kreek, M.J.: Narcotic blockade: a medical
technique for stopping heroin use by addicts. Transactions of the Association of
American Physicians (May 1966), 79:122-136, 1966. (including discussion)
Dole, V.P., Nyswander, M.E. and Kreek, M.J.: Narcotic blockade. Arch. Intern. Med.,
118:304-309, 1966.
Vincent P. Dole, Jr., MD; Marie Nyswander, MD; and Mary Jeanne Kreek, MD
Page 4
Impact of Short-Acting Heroin versus Long-Acting Methadone Administered on a Chronic Basis in Humans
(1964 through 1978 Studies): Opioid Agonist Pharmacokinetics – Heroin Versus Methadone
Drug or
Medication
Apparent Plasma Terminal
Half-life and Duration of
Desired Effects
HEROIN 3 min for prodrug
30 min for active
compound, mono-acetyl
morphine (fast on-set and
off-set)
6 hours for active
metabolites (morphine
and others)
Fu
ncti
on
al
Sta
te
(Hero
in)
"High"
"Straight"
"Sick"
Days
AM PM AM PM AM
Fu
ncti
on
al
Sta
te
(Meth
ad
on
e) "High"
"Straight"
"Sick"
Days
AM PM AM PM AM
H
METHADONE 24h for racemic (rs)
medication (slow on-set
and off-set – steady-state
achieved)
48h for active (r)
enantiomer
Dole, Nyswander and Kreek, 1966; Kreek et al., 1973; 1976; 1977; 1979; 1982; Inturrisi et al, 1973; 1984; 2018
Page 5
Overdose Deaths in Thousands in Preceding 12 months
• Drug overdoses,
primarily opioids, killed
more than 72,300
Americans in 2017, a
record and a rise of
approximately 10%
over 2016
• Drug overdose deaths
in 2017 were higher
than the peak yearly
deaths from HIV, car
accidents, or gun
deaths
• Overdose deaths have
begun to fall in
Massachusetts,
Vermont, and Rhode
Island following major
public health
campaigns, including
increased access to
treatment, in response
to the early arrival of
fentanyl in those states
Sanger-Katz, NY Times,
Aug 15, 2018
Synthetic
opioids
Other
opioids
Other Psychostimulants
Methadone
Heroin
Cocaine
30 thousand
20
10
0
2015 2016 2017
Page 6
National Household Survey and Related Surveys – 2007 – 2016
Heroin Use – ever ~ 5.2 million
Heroin Addiction ~ 626,000
Illicit Use of Opiate Medication – ever ~ 37.1 million
(i.e., 14.2% of the population 12 and over)
Dependence on Opiate Medication Use ~ 2.1 million
Opiate (heroin, fentanyl, other) Overdose Deaths 49,068 (in 2017)*
Cocaine Use – ever ~ 40.5 million
Cocaine Addiction ~ 966,000
Alcohol Use – ever ~ 216 million
Alcoholism ~ 14.5 million
Marijuana Use – ever ~ 123 million
Marijuana Daily Use ~ 4 million
Prevalence of Specific Drug Abuse and Vulnerability to Develop Addictions – 2019
SAMHSA Nat’l Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2017; Others, 2007-18; *Nat’l Center for Health Statistics (CDC), 2019
Opiate Addiction ~ 1 in 5 to 1 in 15
(20% to 6.5%)
Alcoholism, Marijuana, and Cocaine Dependency ~ 1 in 8 to 1 in 15
(12.5% to 6.5%)
Development of Addiction After Self-Exposure to Specific Drugs
Page 7
Research and Clinical Evidence Contributes to Specific Actions for “Prevention”, “Reversal”, and “Reduction”
of Illicit Opiate Use and Overdose Deaths (53,332 in 2016)
“Prevention of Overdose”
– FDA recommended by outside experts to approve opioid prescriptions for
acute pain for only seven days (1-3 days adequate for most patients; now
prescriptions usually are for 21 days) and possibly to allow chronic opioid
prescriptions for cancer pain only.
“Reversal of Overdose”
– Naloxone (IM, IV, or pernasal) is the primary way to reverse overdose
(60-90m duration of action); two other mu opioid receptor antagonists,
naltrexone and nalmefene, if available in an IV form, would also work.
“Reduction by Long-Term, Effective Treatment”
– Methadone maintenance pharmacotherapy: 55 years of clinical research
and practice evidence of effectiveness (60-80% 12-month voluntary
retention with reduction or elimination of opiate use in over 80% of
patients; half life 24-36 hours; oral dose 80-150mg per day)
– Buprenorphine-naloxone maintenance pharmacotherapy: 30 years of
clinical research and practice evidence of effectiveness (40-60% 6-month
voluntary retention; receptor occupancy of 24 hours; 24-32mg per day
sublingual or film; naloxone added to prevent intravenous abuse)
Kreek, Adelson, and other colleagues 1966, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1978, 2000, 2002, 2017, 2019
Page 8
Identification of HIV-1 Infection in Intravenous Drug Users
New York City: 1983 – 1984 Study
Protective Effect of Methadone Maintenance Treatment
50% – 60% Untreated, street heroin addicts: positive for HIV-1 antibody
9% Methadone maintained since <1978 (beginning of AIDS epidemic):
less than 10% positive for HIV-1 antibody
40% – 90% Heroin addicts in treatment positive for Hepatitis C infection
(But less than 10% in treatment for Hepatitis C)
Des Jarlais, Kreek, et al., MMWR: Morbid. Mortal. Wkly Rep., 33:377, 1984; Novick, Khan, Kreek,
United Nations Bulletin on Narcotics, 38:15, 1986; Des Jarlais, Kreek et al., JAMA, 261:1008, 1989.
100
75
50
25
0
%
1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1992
Percent of IV Drug Users Infected with HIV-1
Page 9
Number of patients currently in treatment:
USA: ~ 360,000 Europe: ~ 600,000 Rest of world: ~ 400,000
Efficacy in “good” methadone treatment programs using adequate doses
(80 to 150mg/d):
Voluntary retention in treatment (1 year or more) 60 – 80%
Continuing use of illicit heroin 5 – 20%
Actions of methadone treatment:
• Prevents withdrawal symptoms and “drug hunger”
• Blocks euphoric effects of short-acting narcotics
• Allows normalization of disrupted physiology
Mechanism of action: Long-acting medication (24h half-life for racemate in
humans) provides steady levels of opioid at specific receptor sites.
Methadone Maintenance Treatment for Opiate (Heroin) Addiction – 2019
Kreek, 1972; 1973; 2019
~ 1.4 million worldwide
• methadone found to be a full mu opioid receptor agonist which
internalizes like endorphins (beta-endorphin and enkephalins)
• methadone also has modest NMDA receptor complex antagonism
Page 10
Status of Methadone, Buprenorphine, and Extended Release Naltrexone Treatments for Opioid Addiction
in the United States: Decrease, then Increase, of Numbers in Treatment 2015-2017
(2015, 2016, and 2017 data, SAMHSA, 2018)*
Source: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse
and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), National Survey of
Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS), 2018; Kreek 2019
US Patients in Treatment
Treatment 2015 2016 2017
Methadone
Maintenance
356,843 345,443
(-11,400; -3.2%)
382,867
(+37,424; +10.8%)
Buprenorphine
Maintenance
75,723 61,486
(-14,237; -18.8%)
112,223
(+50,737; +82.5%)
Extended
Release
Naltrexone
7,035 10,128
(+3,093; +44.0%)
23,065
(+12,937; +128.7%)
Page 11
I. Opiate Addiction (Heroin and Illicit Use of Prescription Opiates) a. METHADONE (60-80%)**
b. BUPRENORPHINE (+ NALOXONE) (40-50%)**
[c. NALTREXONE / SUSTAINED RELEASE NALTREXONE (<15%)*]
II. Alcohol Addiction and Excessive Alcohol Use a. NALTREXONE (30-40%)*
b. NALMEFENE (approved in Europe only, 2012)
c. ACAMPROSATE (low in USA)
III. Cocaine, Amphetamines, Methamphetamines and Other Stimulants NONE
Limited Targeted Pharmacotherapies Available for Specific Addictive Diseases
Kreek, 2019
According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse, every year drug and
alcohol misuse costs the United States $64 billion in healthcare and a total
of $600 billion in healthcare, crime and criminal justice, and loss of
productivity costs. By comparison, cancer costs $172 billion annually.
Effective treatment saves around $12 for every $1 spent.
(%) is % of unselected persons with specific addictions who can be retained voluntarily in
treatment for 3 months (*) or 12 months (**), with success in eliminating specific drug use.
Page 12
Targets of Currently Approved Treatments for Addictive Disorders
Kreek et al, Journal of Clinical Investigation, 12: 3387, 2012
Page 13
Natural History of Drug and Alcohol
Abuse and Addictions
Initial Use of
Drug of Abuse
Sporadic
Intermittent
Use
Regular
Use Addiction Early
Withdrawal
(abstinence)
Protracted
Abstinence
Primary
Prevention
Possible Utility of Vaccines
and Selected Medications
Medications Useful
and Needed
Adapted from Kreek et al., Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 1:710, 2002; 2019
Progression
relapse to addiction without
pharmacotherapy
90% - opiate;
60% - cocaine, alcohol
sustain abstinence with no
specific medications
10% - opiate;
40% - cocaine, alcohol
ADDICTION: Compulsive drug seeking behavior
and drug self-administration, without regard to
negative consequences to self or others
(adapted from WHO).
Page 14
Factors Contributing to Vulnerability to Develop a Specific Addiction
use of the drug of abuse essential (100%)
Genetic
(25-80%) • DNA
• SNPs
• repeats
• other
polymorphisms
Drug-Induced Effects
(very high)
Environmental
(very high) • prenatal
• postnatal
• epigenetics
• cues
• peer pressure
• comorbidity
• stress-responsivity
Kreek et al., 2000; 2005; 2019
• mRNA levels
• peptides
• proteomics
• neurochemistry
• synaptogenesis
• behaviors
Page 15
Development of an Addiction: Neurobiology
•Drugs (and alcohol) which may lead to chemical addictions alter normal brain
networks and neurochemicals, primarily the dopaminergic and endogenous
opioid systems, in the substantia nigra compacta (SNc), ventral tegmental area
(VTA), dorsal (caudate putamen) and ventral (nucleus accumbens) striatum,
and also amygdala, anterior cingulate, and prefrontal cortex
• “Rewarding”, “pleasurable”, or “reinforcing” effects of drugs involve:
– Dopamine release (opioids), or blockaded reuptake (cocaine), with
progressively lower levels of synaptic dopamine during chronic
administration or self-administration of opiate or cocaine (Mu opioid receptor
agonists inhibit GABAergic neurons which inhibit dopamine release)
– Beta Endorphin and the Enkephalins (“Endorphins”) acting at
Mu Opioid Receptors, with progressive beta-endorphin deficiency with
chronic administration or self-administration of opiate or cocaine
• “Countermodulatory” response to reward involves:
– Dynorphins, acting at Kappa Opioid Receptors, lower dopamine levels
(heroin or other short-acting opiates and cocaine increase dynorphin mRNA
levels and peptides in a persistent manner and increase kappa opioid
receptors)
Kreek 1992-2015, 2019
Page 16
• “Binge” Pattern Cocaine Parenteral Administration (Rat or Mouse):
Constant or Ascending Dose
(mimics most common pattern of human use in addiction)
• Intermittent Heroin (Morphine) Parenteral Administration (Rat or Mouse):
Constant or Ascending Dose
(mimics most common pattern of human use in addiction)
• “Binge” Pattern Oral Alcohol Self-Administration (Mouse):
(mimics common pattern of human excessive use)
• Chronic Escalation (24h Access every other day) Alcohol Self-Administration
(Rat or Mouse):
(mimics common pattern of human excessive use)
• Intravenous Self-Administration (Rat) Extended Access 10h or 18h with
Individual Selection of Dose Escalation (Heroin, Oxycodone, or Cocaine)
• Intravenous Self-Administration (Mouse) Extended Access 4h for adult mice;
2h maximum for adolescent mice (Heroin, Oxycodone, or Cocaine)
• Intravenous Pump Methadone Administration (Rat):
(converts short-acting pharmacokinetic properties of opioid
agonist in rodent to long-acting human pharmacokinetic profile)
Bidirectional-Translational Research: Novel and Conventional Rodent Models
to Mimic Human Patterns of Abuse
Kreek et al., 1987;
1992; 2001; 2005; 2019
Page 17
DOPAMINE SYNAPSE
Kreek, 2016
Maisonneuve, 1994
Heroin (or other opiates) increases
dopamine release by acting at mu
opioid receptors to inhibit
GABAergic inhibition in the SNc
and VTA
Cocaine blocks dopamine
re-uptake at synapse
National Institute on Drug Abuse
Frontal
cortex
Nucleus
accumbens
VTA
Striatum
Substantia
nigra
Page 18
Atypical responsivity to
stress and stressors
may contribute to the
persistence of, and
relapse to, self-
administration of drugs
of abuse and thus to
addictive diseases.
Such atypical stress
responsivity in some
individuals may exist
prior to use of addictive
drugs on a genetic or
acquired basis, and
increase the
vulnerability to develop
an addictive disease. Kreek, 1972; 1981; 1982; 1984 … 2019
Development of an Addiction: Stress and Atypical Responsivity to Stressors –
HPA Axis
–
–
b-End
adrenal
POMC
hypothalamus
ACTH
Anterior pituitary +
Cortisol
+
Endogenous
Opioids
(mu – inhibition)
(kappa – ? activation)
Arginine
Vasopressin
+
CRF
Page 19
Oxycodone – Mu Opioid Receptor Mediated Reward:
Studies in Rodent Models
Page 20
REWARD– Self-Administration of Oxycodone (0.25 mg/kg/infusion) in C57BL6 Adult Male Mice:
Long Access vs Short Access
Zhang et al, Psychopharmacology, 231, 1277, 2013
4-hr Sessions n=11
1-hr Sessions n=8
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4
0
5
1 0
1 5
2 0
2 5
3 0
0
2
4
6
8
S e s s io n s
No
se
Po
ke
s /
1 h
ou
r s
es
sio
n
Mg
/kg
/infu
sio
n
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4
0
5
1 0
1 5
2 0
2 5
3 0
3 5
0
2
4
6
8
A c tiv e H o le
In a c tiv e H o le
S e s s io n s
No
se
Po
ke
s /
4 h
ou
r s
es
sio
ns
mg
/kg
/infu
sio
n
Page 21
REWARD – Self-Administration of Oxycodone (0.25 mg/kg/infusion)
in C57BL6 Adolescent Male (35d-49d) Compared with Adult Male
(11-13 weeks) Mice (FR1: 2 hours/day Over 14 Days)
Mayer-Blackwell…Zhang, Neuroscience, 258:280, 2013
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4
0
5
1 0
1 5
2 0
2 5
1
2
3
4
5
6A d u lt O x y (n = 1 1 )
A d o le s c e n t O x y (n = 1 2 )
S e s s io n s
Nu
mb
er o
f N
os
e P
ok
es
at
Ac
tiv
e H
ole
(F
R1
)
Ox
yc
od
on
e m
g/k
g
Page 22
0
2 0 0
4 0 0
6 0 0
Y o k e d S a l
O x y c o d o n e
O x y c o d o n e D o s e (m g /k g )
Inc
re
as
ed
Tim
e (
se
c)
on
Ox
yc
od
on
e S
ide
0 1 3
*
3 .3 5 m g /k g 5 m g /k g 7 .5 m g /k g
0
1 0 0 0
2 0 0 0
3 0 0 0
4 0 0 0
5 0 0 0
O x y c o d o n e d o s e (a n tin o c ic e p tio n p ro b e )
AU
C %
MP
E (
10
-6
0 m
in)
p < 0 .0 5
Yoked Saline
Oxycodone Self-Administration
Adolescent Oxycodone SA in Male Mice Leads Both to
Tolerance in Oxycodone-Induced Anti-Nociception and
Increases in Oxycodone-Induced CPP in Adulthood
Zhang et al., Neuropharmacology, 111:314, 2016
Hot Plate Analgesia Test Condition Place Preference (liking)
Page 23
REWARD – BIDIRECTIONAL TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH
mRNA Levels of Several Genes Increased by Oxycodone (SA) in the
Dorsal Striatum in Adolescent and Adult Mice are SNPs Found to be
Associated with Opiate Addiction in Humans
ADULT MOUSE HUMAN SNPs
Gene Symbol Protein Gene
Expression Change
SNP Location Opiate
Addiction EA AA
NPY1R Neuropeptide Y receptor Y1 ↑ rs4518200 5' near gene x
NPY5R Neuropeptide Y receptor Y5 ↑ rs6536721 intergenic x
CHRM5 Cholinergic receptor, muscarinic 5 ↑ rs4041435 5'-UTR x
rs4779656 5'-UTR x rs2684941 5'-UTR x
HTR3A 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) receptor 3A
↑ rs897687 Intron x
Levran et al., Gene Brain & Behav., 8:531, 2009; Levran et al., Psychoneuroendocrinol., 45:67, 2014
Mayer-Blackwell et al., Neurosci., 258:280, 2014; Levran et al., Ann Hum Genet., 78:290, 2014; Zhang et al., Psychopharmacol., 231:1277,
2014; Levran et al., CNS Neurosci Ther., 11:898, 2015; Levran et al., Prog in Neuro-Psychopharmacol & Biol Psych, 11:898, 2016
ADOLESCENT MOUSE HUMAN SNPs
Gene Symbol Protein Gene
Expression Change
SNP Location Opiate
Addiction EA AA
NPY1R Neuropeptide Y receptor Y1 ↑ rs4518200 5' near gene x
NPY5R Neuropeptide Y receptor Y5 ↑ rs6536721 intergenic x
MC2R Melanocortin 2 receptor ↑ rs1893219 5' near gene x
Page 24
Chronic (14d) Oxycodone Self-Administration (4h/d; 0.25mg/kg per adm.; FR1) Alters Expression of
Reward- and Stress-Related Genes in Ventral and Dorsal Striatum in C57BL/6J Male Mice: RNAseq Analysis
• Transcription-wide Sequencing (RNAseq)
• Focus on: – Selected genes (based on our human genetic and rodent studies) were analyzed :
123 genes, mainly from opioid, stress-responsive, and neurotransmitter systems
– Genes possibly involved in development of opioid addiction
• Significant changes in mRNA levels (difference between oxycodone SA and
yoked saline-controlled mice, 5 mice/group): – Ventral Striatum: Changes in mRNA levels of 32 genes – 15 increased; 17 decreased
– Dorsal Striatum: Changes in mRNA levels of 7 genes – 5 increased; 2 decreased
• Expression (mRNA levels) of five genes in the ventral striatum showed
experiment-wise changes: – Increased mRNA levels: Proopiomelanocortin (Pomc) and Serotonin 5-HT-2A
receptor (Htr2a)
– Decreased mRNA levels: Serotonin receptor 7 (Htr7), Galanin receptor1 (Galr1) and
Glycine receptor 1 (Glra1)
• Confirmation of gene-expression changes of 2 of the 5 experiment-wise findings
(Pomc and Htr7) using qPCR; other 3 not analyzed
Y Zhang, Y Liang, C Zhao, et al, Neuroscience, in press, 2019
Page 25
Countermodulation of Reward – Reversal or Modulation of Drug or
Task-induced Stress:
Kappa Opioid Receptor-Dynorphin Neurobiology
Page 26
Control
1
Control
3
Cocaine
2
Cocaine
4
Spangler… and Kreek, Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res., 19:323-327, 1993;
Unterwald, Rubenfeld, and Kreek , NeuroReport, 5:1613, 1994;
Spangler, Ho, Zhou, Maggos, Yuferov, and Kreek , Mol. Brain Res., 38:71, 1996
7
6
5
4
1
0
pg
pp
Dy
n m
RN
A /
µg
to
tal R
NA
Caudate Putamen Nucleus
Accumbens
Saline
14 day cocaine
(15mg/kg x 3)
COUNTERMODULATION – KAPPA OPIOID RECEPTOR-DYNORPHIN SYSTEM: Cocaine Increases Kappa Opioid
Receptor Density in Rat, But Kappa Opioid Receptor Directed “Dynorphins” Also Increase Persistently
Dynorphin Acting at the Kappa Opioid Receptor Lowers
Dopamine Levels and Prevents Surge After Cocaine
Page 27
COUNTERMODULATION OF REWARD: Natural Dynorphin A1-17 (Kappa Opioid Receptor Agonist) Infusion into Mouse Striatum Lowers Basal and Cocaine
Induced Dopamine Levels
Zhang, Butelman, Schlussman, Ho, and Kreek, Psychopharmacology, 172:422, 2004
20-min Sample
10
8
6
4
2
0 60 120 180
Infusion
Do
pam
ine
in
Dia
lysa
te (
nM
)
Dynorphin Dose (nmol) 0 1.0
2.0 4.4
4.4+nBNI
(antagonist) Dynorphin (4.4nmol)
+ Cocaine (15mg/kg)
Infusion and Injection
Control
Cocaine (15mg/kg)
8
6
4
2
0 60 120 180
10
Infusion Injection D
op
am
ine i
n
Dia
lysa
te (
nM
) 20-min Sample
Page 28
Reed et al., Neuroscience, 220:109-118, 2012
Stress Manifested by Immobility During Forced Swim in Rats is Due To Increased Dynorphin Levels:
Effect Reversed by Kappa Opioid Receptor Antagonist (nor-BNI) in Dose-Dependent Manner
Swim 15 Minutes Day 1;
1 hour later pre-treatment
nor-BNI
Swim 5 Minutes Day 2
0 mg/kg (n=6)
5 mg/kg (n=6)
10 mg/kg (n=6)
nor-BNI Dose
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Immobility
(* - p<0.05)
*
Sc
ore
Page 29
Kreek et al., 1994; 1999; 2016
+
Dynorphin A1-13
anterior pituitary
lactotropes
Hypothalamus
TIDA
–
–
COUNTERMODULATION – KAPPA OPIOID RECEPTOR – DYNORPHIN SYSTEM: “BIOMARKER” Dynorphin A Lowers Tuberoinfundibular Dopaminergic Tone,
which Tonically Inhibits Prolactin Release
Time after injection (min)
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 75 150 90 120 240 180
500 µ g/kg
120 µ g/kg
Placebo (n=10) P
rola
cti
n L
evels
(n
g/m
l)
Dose-Response Effects of Dynorphin A1-13 on
Prolactin Levels (BIOMARKER) in Normal Volunteers
Page 30
Compounds Approved for Use in Human Therapeutics with KOPr Partial Agonism in Addition to Mu-Opioid
Receptor Antagonism or Partial Agonism and Binding Affinity in Cloned Human Receptors
Kreek, Reed, Butelman 2014
MOP-r
affinity
Ki (nM)
0.66 0.11 0.24 0.21
KOP-r
affinity
Ki (nM)
1.2 0.19 0.083 0.62
DOP-r
affinity
Ki (nM)
120 60 16 2.1
Naloxone Naltrexone Nalmefene Buprenorphine
Page 31
CURRENT TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH: POTENTIAL TARGET FOR NOVEL PHARMACOTHERAPIES FOR
COCAINE ADDICTION OR ALCOHOLISM – KAPPA OPIOID RECEPTOR / DYNORPHIN SYSTEM
• Novel target for possible treatment of cocaine addiction, alcoholism, and
stimulant or alcohol co-dependence with opioid addiction. (Our laboratory
and others have shown that heroin, morphine, cocaine, and alcohol and
also stress (e.g., forced swim test) increase dynorphin gene expression in
rodents.)
• Kappa Opioid Receptor Full Agonist – decreases dopaminergic surge and
lowers dopaminergic tone – ? thus reduction of reward after cocaine,
alcohol, or opiate use – ? but possibly with persistent dysphoric side-
effects (? avoid by use of biased kappa agonist)
• Kappa Opioid Receptor Antagonist – ? reduction of depressive symptoms,
stress-related, spontaneous, or drug use-induced,
? decreased relapse to drug use; possible increases in dopamine surge
after drug or alcohol self-administration
• Kappa Opioid Receptor Partial Agonist (antagonist and agonist) – reduces
dopaminergic surge and modulates dopaminergic tone – ? thus reduction
of reward after cocaine, alcohol, or opiate use – and ? reduction of
depressive symptoms Kreek, AD Dunn, AM Dunn, Butelman, Reed, in preparation, 2019
Page 32
Kappa Opioid Receptor Agonists or Partial Agonists:
Unbiased or Biased Agonism
• Kappa Opioid Receptor
member of 7-transmembrane
GPCR family
• Unbiased kappa opioid
receptor agonists (prototypes:
U50,488 and U69,593) activate
both G-protein vs. β-arrestin
pathways
• Biased agonists: differentially
activate intracellular pathways
(G-protein vs. β-arrestin)
G-protein β-arrestin
Analgesia Sedation
Motor incoordination
? ?
Anhedonia Reed, AD Dunn, Butelman, Kreek, CPDD 2017
?
Page 33
Development of Novel Selective Kappa Opioid
Receptor Partial Agonist (Unbiased or Biased) Goal: Synthesize, screen, and thus discover compound(s) with kappa partial agonist activity, without activity at other receptors. Test in animal models of addiction.
[Funded by Robertson Therapeutic Development Fund with introduction to a contract synthesis and analysis company and, as of September 2017, also funded by the Tri-Institutional Therapy Discovery Institute]
Approach: Synthesize analogs of different candidate backbone structures
Initial studies – in vitro binding and signaling • Determine Kappa Opioid Receptor Binding • Elucidate G-protein and b-arrestin Signaling Efficacy
(? unbiased or biased) • Determine binding to the mu and delta opioid receptors
Current Project Status: ~200 novel compounds synthesized (Kreek Lab/WuXi); to date, ~60 identified with Ki <100 nM, and ~10 of these also meeting our second criteria of G protein efficacy in range of 20-80%. Continuing iterative syntheses.
Reed, Dunn, et al, in progress, 2019
Page 34
LY2444296 – “Tool” compound
(Lilly – Laboratory)
LY2456302 – “OpraKappa”
(Lilly – Clinical)
REVERSAL OF DYNORPHIN-KAPPA
INDUCED STRESS – Short-Acting Selective
Kappa Opioid Receptor Antagonists
CERC-501
(now owned by
Jansen of Johnson & Johnson
and under study for
treatment of depression)
Kreek, 2019
Page 35
Pretreatment with “tool compound” (LY2444296) reduces
anxiety- and depression-like behaviors in rats 30h in withdrawal
from extended-access (18h/d, 14d) cocaine self-administration
La
ten
cy
to
im
mo
bil
ity
(s
)
0
75
150
225
300
Vehicle
LY2444296 3 mg/kg
**
Valenza et al., Psychopharmacology, 234: 2219, 2017
La
ten
cy
to
en
ter
in o
pe
n a
rms
(s
)
0
75
150
225
300
***
ELEVATED PLUS MAZE
Tim
e
in o
pe
n a
rms
(s
)
0
10
20
30
40
50vehicle
LY2444296 3 mg/kg
*
La
ten
cy
to
im
mo
bil
ity
(s
)
0
75
150
225
300
Vehicle
LY2444296 3 mg/kg
Imm
ob
ilit
y (
s)
0
30
60
90
120
150FORCED SWIM TEST
*
Page 36
“OpraK” Clinical Study (LY2456302): kappa opioid receptor antagonist
We have hypothesized that a selective kappa opioid
receptor (KOPr) antagonist might be helpful in managing the
dysphoric and depressive symptoms of early and protracted
abstinence from cocaine or alcohol. However, we also have
hypothesized that a KOPr antagonist might increase the reward
of cocaine or alcohol by increasing baseline dopaminergic tone
and drug-induced dopamine surges. There is only limited data
available on the impact of selective KOP-r antagonism in
humans.
We have conducted an in-patient basic research study that
examined neuroendocrine and behavioral effects of a novel
short-acting selective KOP-r antagonist, LY2456302 (which we
call “OpraK”) in normal volunteers (n=40) and in volunteers
diagnosed with cocaine dependence (DSM IV) (n=30). Four days
of drug administration caused no adverse effects. Reed et al, Neuropsychopharmacology, 43:739, 2017
Page 37
-30 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420 450 480
0
5
10
15
20
25
seru
m p
ro
lacti
n (
ng
/mL
)
Time (min)
Normal Volunteers
(n=24)
Early Abstinence
Cocaine Dependent
Volunteers
(n=19)
“OpraK”: Prolactin Levels – Male Normal Volunteers vs. Early
Abstinence Cocaine Dependent Volunteers – No Evidence of Kappa Partial Agonism
-30 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420 450 4800
5
10
15
20
25
seru
m p
rola
cti
n (
ng
/mL
)
Time (min)
Baseline, Day 1
1st OpraK (10mg), Day 2
4th OpraK (10mg), Day 5
Time (min)
Baseline, Day 1
1st OpraK (10mg), Day 2
4th OpraK (10mg), Day 5
Reed et al, Neuropsychopharmacology, 43:739, 2017
Page 38
“OpraK”: Serum ACTH and Cortisol Levels AUC – Normal Volunteers
vs. Early Abstinence Cocaine Dependent Volunteers: Evidence of Partial Mu Opioid Receptor Antagonism
Baseline-Day 1 1st OpraKappa-Day 2 4th OpraKappa-Day 5
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
p<0.05
Are
a U
nd
er
the
Cu
rve
, 0
-48
0 m
inu
tes
, A
CT
H
Day
p<0.005
HV (n=39)
EACD (n=23)
Baseline-Day 1 1st OpraKappa-Day 24th OpraKappa-Day 5
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000 p<0.0005
Are
a U
nd
er
the
Cu
rve
, 0
-48
0 m
inu
tes
, c
ort
iso
l
Day
p<0.0005
HV (n=16)
EACD (n=13)
ACTH Cortisol
Reed et al, Neuropsychopharmacology, 43:739, 2017
Baseline
Day 1
1st OpraK
(10mg)
Day 2
4th OpraK
(10mg)
Day 5
Baseline
Day 1
1st OpraK
(10mg)
Day 2
4th OpraK
(10mg)
Day 5
Page 39
Human Molecular Genetics (1998-2019):
Three Functional Polymorphisms from Mu Opioid Receptor
and Dynorphin Opioid Peptide Genes
Page 40
Genetic Variants of the Human Mu Opioid Receptor: Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in the Coding Region
Including the Functional A118G (N40D) Variant
HYPOTHESIS
Gene variants:
• Alter physiology
“PHYSIOGENETICS”
• Alter response to
medications
“PHARMACOGENETICS”
• Are associated with
specific addictions
(A118G)
(C17T)
Bond, LaForge… Kreek, Yu, PNAS, 95:9608, 1998; Kreek, Yuferov and LaForge, 2000
Page 41
FUNCTIONAL MOP-r (A118G) VARIANT – Enhanced
Binding and Coupling to G Protein-Activated, Inwardly Rectifying K+(GIRK) Channels by Beta-Endorphin Acting
at A118G Variant Compared with Prototype A118A
Log [b Endorphin (M)]
1.0
0.5
0
-9 -8 -7 -6
A118G
Prototype
Fra
cti
on
Maxim
um
Cu
rren
t R
esp
on
se
Bond, LaForge… Kreek, Yu, PNAS, 95:9608, 1998; Kreek, Yuferov and LaForge, 2000
Log [b Endorphin (M)]
100
80
60
40
20
0
-11 -10 -9 -8 -7
Pe
rce
nt
Bo
un
d A118G
Prototype
Page 42
FUNCTIONAL MOP-r (A118G) VARIANT – “Physiogenetics” Related to A118G Variant of Human
Mu Opioid Receptor Gene – Alters Stress Responsivity in Healthy Control Volunteers
Se
rum
Co
rtis
ol (u
g/d
l)
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10 8
50 0 50 100 150 200
Time (min)
P
I
A/A (n=29) A/G (n=7) N N
N
N
N = Naloxone P = Placebo
Wand et al., Neuropsychopharmacol, 26:106, 2002
Chong…Wand, Neuropsychopharmacology, 31:204, 2006
2500
2000
1000
500
1500
0
Cortisol
P < 0.05
Prototype A118G
40 19
Co
rtis
ol
Levels
- A
UC
(9:3
0am
-10:3
0am
+ 9
0m
in)
(no
fo
od
fo
r 9 h
ou
rs)
Bart et al. Neuropsychopharmacology,
31:2313-2317, 2006
Page 43
Association Between a Functional Polymorphism (SNP) in the Mu Opioid Receptor Gene (A118G) and Opiate Addiction and Also Alcoholism in Central Sweden
Alcohol Dependent (n=389) Control (n=170)
118G Allele Frequency * 0.125
(12.5%)
0.074
(7.4%)
Odds Ratio=1.92 p=0.0074
In the entire study group in this central Swedish population:
Attributable Risk due to genotypes with a G allele: 11.1%
* Overall 118G Allele Frequency = 0.109 (10.9%)
Bart et al., Neuropsychopharmacology, 30:417, 2005
Opiate Dependent (n=139) Control (n=170)
118G Allele Frequency 0.155
(15.5%)
0.074
(7.4%)
Odds Ratio=2.86 p=0.00025
Bart et al., Molecular Psychiatry, 9:547-549, 2004
In the entire study group in this central Swedish population:
Attributable Risk due to genotypes with a G allele: 18%
Page 44
Genetically Modified A112G Mice, A Model of the Human A118G Mu Opioid Receptor Functional Variant:
Microdialysis in Striatum of Wild-Type AA ( ) versus Genetically Modified GG ( ) Mice: Absolute Dopamine Levels (Three Baseline
Samples) and Levels of Dopamine after Heroin Injections
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
10mg/kg
Heroin
20mg/kg
Heroin
GG (6)
AA (6)
Do
pa
min
e (
nM
)
Females 14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
10mg/kg
Heroin
20mg/kg
Heroin
GG (6)
AA (7)
Do
pa
min
e (
nM
)
Males
Zhang, Blendy…Kreek et al., Neuropsychopharmacology, 40:1091, 2015
Page 45
Zhang, Blendy…Kreek et al., Neuropsychopharm, 40:1091, 2015; unpublished data presented at CPDD 2018
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0
0
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
0
2
4
6
8
1 0
Da
ily
He
ro
in S
A (
mg
/kg
)
A A (1 5 )
G G (1 2 )
No
se
po
ke
s (
FR
=1
, 0
.25
mg
/kg
)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0
0
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
0
2
4
6
8
1 0
Da
ily
He
ro
in S
A (
mg
/kg
)
A A (12)
G G (1 2 )
No
se
po
ke
s (
FR
=1
, 0
.25
mg
/kg
)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0
0
2 0
4 0
6 0
0
5
1 0
1 5
No
se
po
ke
s (
FR
=1
,0
.25
mg
/kg
)
Da
ily
Ox
yc
od
on
e S
A (
mg
/kg
)
O x y -A A (7 )
O x y -G G (6 )
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0
0
2 0
4 0
6 0
0
5
1 0
1 5
No
se
po
ke
s (
FR
=1
,0
.25
mg
/kg
)
Da
ily
Ox
yc
od
on
e S
A (
mg
/kg
)
O x y -A A (8 )
O x y -G G (8 )
Males – Oxycodone Females – Oxycodone
Males – Heroin Females – Heroin
Genetically Modified A112G Mice (Asparagine to Aspartic Acid), A Model of the Human A118G Mu Opioid Receptor Functional Variant:
Heroin versus Oxycodone Self-Administration (10d, 4h/d) by Wild-Type AA ( ) versus Genetically Modified GG ( ) versus Mice
Day (4h/d)
Day (4h/d) Day (4h/d)
Day (4h/d)
Page 46
I II III IV
Promoter 68-bp tandem
repeats
rs1997794
3′-UTR
rs6045819
Human prodynorphin gene:
exon / intron organization, repeats, and
single nucleotide polymorphisms
rs34535593
rs35286281
rs10485703
rs910080_T/C
rs910079_T/C
rs2235749_C/T
- 68 base pair tandem repeat – 1 to 5 copies per allele +/- 1 SNP
- Three 3′UTR SNPs (rs910080, rs910079, and rs2235749) are in complete linkage
disequilibrium (LD), and comprise two haplotype blocks: T-T-C or C-C-T
Yuferov et al, Neuropsychopharmacology, 34:1185, 2009;
Rouault et al., Addict. Biol. 16: 334, 2011; Yufererov et al, Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 14:1025, 2018
ATG
rs6035222
Page 47
In African Americans, the 68 Base Pair Repeat Polymorphism of Dynorphin Gene – Long (LL) and also Short/Long (SL) (probably
yielding relatively lower amounts of dynorphin peptide) Associated with Cocaine/Alcohol Dependence (Early Study, 2007)
Long = 3,3; 3,4; 4,4 Long/Short = 1,3; 1,4; 2,3; 2,4 Short = 1,1; 1,2; 2,2
*SS versus SL – Fisher 1-sided mid-p = 0.013 (= 0.01, rounded)
**SS versus LL – Fisher 1-sided mid-p = 0.009
***SS versus SL + LL is significant in cocaine-alcohol dependent group; Chi-square
p=0.0081)
Williams, Ott, et al, Addict. Biol. 12:496, 2007; further statistical analysis, Ott and Butelman 2018
TGACTTA
68 bp repeat
Transcription start
CAAT TATA
box
Controls Cocaine/Alcohol Dependent
Genotype
Short
(SS)
Short/Long
(SL)*
Long
(LL)
Short
(SS)
Short/Long
(SL)
Long
(LL)
African
American (61 cases/
49 controls)
n
%
19
39%
16
33%
14
29%
10
16%
26*
43%
25**
42%
Page 48
S S + S L L L
0
2 5
5 0
7 5
1 0 0
1 2 5
F e m a le s
G e n o ty p e
Nu
mb
er o
f p
arti
cip
an
ts
2 : N S
S S + S L L L
0
2 5
5 0
7 5
1 0 0
1 2 5
M a le s
G e n o ty p e
Nu
mb
er o
f p
arti
cip
an
ts 2 = 6 .0 8 : p < 0 .0 5
" L o w " c a n n a b is e x p o s u re (K M S K 0 -4 ) "M e d iu m " c a n n a b is e x p o s u re (K M S K 5 -9 )
"H ig h " E x p o s u re (d e p e n d e n c e ; K M S K 1 0 -1 4 )
In African American Males, but not Females, the 68 Base Pair Repeat Polymorphism of Dynorphin Gene Short Short (SS) or Short Long (SL) (probably yielding higher amounts of dynorphin peptide) is Associated
with Greater Lifetime Self-Exposure to Cannabis
African American volunteer subjects with
cannabis KMSK scores of 0–4, 5-9, and 10–14,
respectively (KMSK 10 is cut-off for dependence
for cannabis).
Yuferov, Butelman, Kreek, Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat., 14:1025, 2018
SS - 1/1, 1/2 or 2/2 copies
SL - 1/3 or 2/3 copies
LL - 3/3 or 3/4 copies of the 68 bp repeat
40
114
26 28
5
55 55
9
54 54
7
26
Page 49
Shared SNPs, e.g.:
DRD2: rs1076563
rs2587546 Kreek 2018 after Levran 2015
African
Descent
European
Descent
African cluster
European cluster
European
sample
(24 genes)
African
sample
(35 genes)
12 genes
Stress Dopamine
Serotonin
GABA Opioid
Signal Transduction
Adrenergic
Cholinergic
Circadian
Rhythms
Recent Published Results from Our Laboratory on Association of Specific
Gene Variants with Opiate and/or Cocaine Addiction (over 145)
Using AIMS Markers to Define Ethnicity
Page 50
OPRM1 (mu opioid receptor)
OPRD1
(delta opioid receptor)
OPRK1
(kappa opioid receptor)
PDYN (dynorphin peptide)
AVPR1A (arginine vasopressin receptor 1A)
FKBP5
(FK506-binding protein 51/ corticosterone chaperone)
GAL
(galanin)
CSNK1E
(casein kinase 1, epsilon)
CRHBP
(Corticotropin Releasing Hormone Binding Protein)
OPIOID SYSTEM (selected genes) STRESS SYSTEM (selected genes)
updated after Reed et al., Current Psychiatry Reports, 16(11): 504, 2014
Kreek Lab: Bond, Yu, LaForge, Nielsen, Levran, Randesi, Yuferov, and others; Kreek 2019
Opioid Stress
Neuro-
transmitters Total
Genes 5/0 13/11 42/34 60/45
SNPs in Genes 11/0 22/12 48/54 81/66
Genes Replicated 3/0 6/3 13/17 22/20
SNPs Replicated 6/0 7/1 2/30 15/31
ASSOCIATION WITH OPIATE ADDICTION IN
CAUCASIANS, AFRICAN AMERICANS, AND BOTH
Page 51
updated after Reed et al., Current Psychiatry Reports, 16(11): 504, 2014
Kreek Lab: Bond, Yu, LaForge, Nielsen, Levran, Randesi, Yuferov, and others; Kreek 2019
Opioid Stress
Neuro-
transmitters Total
Genes 5/0 13/11 42/34 60/45
SNPs in Genes 11/0 22/12 48/54 81/66
Genes Replicated 3/0 6/3 13/17 22/20
SNPs Replicated 6/0 7/1 2/30 15/31
ASSOCIATION WITH OPIATE ADDICTION IN
CAUCASIANS, AFRICAN AMERICANS, AND BOTH
NEUROTRANSMITTER SYSTEMS (selected genes)
COMT
(catechol-o-methyltransferase)
HTR1B
(serotonin receptor 1B)
BDNF
(brain-derived neurotrophic factor)
GABRG1
(gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) A receptor)
GRIN2A (glutamate receptor, ionotropic, N-methyl D-aspartate 2A)
GAD1
(glutamate decarboxylase 1)
Page 52
The Laboratory of the Biology of Addictive Diseases – 2019
Research Nurse
Practitioner
Kate Brown
Rachel Conybeare
Administrative Team
Kitt Lavoie
Abigail Sintim
Assistants for Research
Ariel Ben-Ezra
Jose Erazo
Michelle Morochnik
Carina Chen
Bryan Elroy
Laboratory Manager
Matthew Randesi
Laboratory Scientists
Eduardo Butelman
Yan Zhou
Orna Levran
Yong Zhang
Vadim Yuferov
Brian Reed
Postdoctoral Fellows
Kyle Windisch
Devon Collins
Guest Investigators
Miriam Adelson
Gavin Bart
Lawrence Brown
Don Des Jarlais
David Novick
Einat Peles
Ellen Unterwald
Graduate Students
Amy Dunn
Statistics & Informatics
Collaborators
Jurg Ott
Yupu Liang
Funded primarily by Dr. Miriam and Sheldon Adelson Medical Research Foundation,
NIH-NIDA, NIH-NIAAA, NIH-CRR, Tri-Institutional Therapeutics Discovery
Institute, Robertson Therapeutic Development Fund, and others
Other Rockefeller
University Collaborators
Brian Chait
Jeff Friedman
Paul Greengard
Bruce McEwen
Don Pfaff
Sid Strickland
Tom Tuschl