Top Banner
The Middle Colonies
24

The Middle Colonies. Back in England… King Charles I was worse than King James as far as the Puritans were concerned. They hated Charles so much that.

Jan 18, 2016

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: The Middle Colonies. Back in England… King Charles I was worse than King James as far as the Puritans were concerned. They hated Charles so much that.

The Middle Colonies

Page 2: The Middle Colonies. Back in England… King Charles I was worse than King James as far as the Puritans were concerned. They hated Charles so much that.

Back in England…

• King Charles I was worse than King James as far as the Puritans were concerned.

• They hated Charles so much that he was beheaded in 1649, and Oliver Cromwell took over.

Page 3: The Middle Colonies. Back in England… King Charles I was worse than King James as far as the Puritans were concerned. They hated Charles so much that.

Sir Anthony VanDyck,Charles I: King of

England at the Hunt, 1635

Musée du Louvre, Paris

King James

Page 4: The Middle Colonies. Back in England… King Charles I was worse than King James as far as the Puritans were concerned. They hated Charles so much that.

Back in England…

• Cromwell was a Puritan and a military dictator during the 1650's, and made a miserable time for Catholics, but he didn't pay a whole lot of attention to the colonies.

Page 5: The Middle Colonies. Back in England… King Charles I was worse than King James as far as the Puritans were concerned. They hated Charles so much that.

Oliver Cromwell

Page 6: The Middle Colonies. Back in England… King Charles I was worse than King James as far as the Puritans were concerned. They hated Charles so much that.

Back in England…

• But, soon enough, Cromwell died (1658), and Charles II came to the throne. This is called the Restoration.

• Charles II repaid his supporters by making them Proprietors in the New World.

Page 7: The Middle Colonies. Back in England… King Charles I was worse than King James as far as the Puritans were concerned. They hated Charles so much that.

King Charles II, 1685 byGodfrey Kneller (1646 - 1723)

Page 8: The Middle Colonies. Back in England… King Charles I was worse than King James as far as the Puritans were concerned. They hated Charles so much that.

New Netherlands becomes New York

• After the Restoration, King Charles II decided to go to war with the Netherlands, and sent their ships to Manhattan Island in 1685.

Page 9: The Middle Colonies. Back in England… King Charles I was worse than King James as far as the Puritans were concerned. They hated Charles so much that.

New Netherlands becomes New York

• A guy named Stuyvesant was the governor of the colony, and because he was so rotten, England was able to take over without a fight.

Page 10: The Middle Colonies. Back in England… King Charles I was worse than King James as far as the Puritans were concerned. They hated Charles so much that.

New York

• New York was ruled by the Duke of York, the brother of Charles II.

• This is called a proprietary colony.• New York grew quickly and prospered.• New York City rapidly became a center for

trade.

Page 11: The Middle Colonies. Back in England… King Charles I was worse than King James as far as the Puritans were concerned. They hated Charles so much that.

The Duke of York

James, the brother of the King

Page 12: The Middle Colonies. Back in England… King Charles I was worse than King James as far as the Puritans were concerned. They hated Charles so much that.

Pennsylvania:

• In 1681, King Charles II gave some land between New York and Maryland to William Penn, because the King owed a debt to Penn's father.

Page 13: The Middle Colonies. Back in England… King Charles I was worse than King James as far as the Puritans were concerned. They hated Charles so much that.

Pennsylvania:

• Penn was a Quaker, a.k.a. the Society of Friends, a small religious group that was also unpopular in England.

Page 14: The Middle Colonies. Back in England… King Charles I was worse than King James as far as the Puritans were concerned. They hated Charles so much that.

Pennsylvania:

• Quaker religious beliefs:o1. Each person had an "inner light"o2. All people were equal before God.o3. Each person had a "spark of

divinity"

Page 15: The Middle Colonies. Back in England… King Charles I was worse than King James as far as the Puritans were concerned. They hated Charles so much that.

Pennsylvania:

• Each person had an "inner light" that could be used to communicate with God directly, C of E thought this was an offensive idea, since it was believed only the ministers were to do this.

Page 16: The Middle Colonies. Back in England… King Charles I was worse than King James as far as the Puritans were concerned. They hated Charles so much that.

Pennsylvania:

• The Quakers were a religion that believed all people were equal before God: men and women, rich and poor, noble and common, and this disrupted the social order.

Page 17: The Middle Colonies. Back in England… King Charles I was worse than King James as far as the Puritans were concerned. They hated Charles so much that.

Pennsylvania:

• If each person had a "spark of divinity," then if a person did something bad, it was in a way saying God did something bad, since God was a part of every person; people could not be expected to pay taxes, fight wars, etc.

Page 18: The Middle Colonies. Back in England… King Charles I was worse than King James as far as the Puritans were concerned. They hated Charles so much that.

Pennsylvania:

• Penn decided to make Pennsylvania a "Holy Experiment," kind of a New England for the Quakers, but Penn also believed in religious toleration, so all faiths were welcome.

Page 19: The Middle Colonies. Back in England… King Charles I was worse than King James as far as the Puritans were concerned. They hated Charles so much that.

A Quaker family holding a prayer meeting.

Page 20: The Middle Colonies. Back in England… King Charles I was worse than King James as far as the Puritans were concerned. They hated Charles so much that.

Pennsylvania:

• Penn was very liberal, and because of this Pennsylvania grew faster than any other colony, attracting colonists from all over Europe. Philadelphia was even bigger than London by the time of the Revolution.

Page 21: The Middle Colonies. Back in England… King Charles I was worse than King James as far as the Puritans were concerned. They hated Charles so much that.

Philadelphia, 1776. By the 1770s Philadelphia had become a highly cultured and prosperous city, the largest in America.

Page 22: The Middle Colonies. Back in England… King Charles I was worse than King James as far as the Puritans were concerned. They hated Charles so much that.

Delaware and New Jersey:

• Delaware was a part of Pennsylvania until after the Revolution.

• New Jersey became a Royal colony in 1702.

Page 23: The Middle Colonies. Back in England… King Charles I was worse than King James as far as the Puritans were concerned. They hated Charles so much that.

Middle Colonies, 1685

Page 24: The Middle Colonies. Back in England… King Charles I was worse than King James as far as the Puritans were concerned. They hated Charles so much that.

Crouch, Nathaniel. English Empire in America. London,

1685