Top Banner
The Mathematics of the Electoral College E. Arthur Robinson, Jr. (with Daniel Ullman) Dec 1, 2010
26

The Mathematics of the Electoral College E. Arthur Robinson, Jr. (with Daniel Ullman) Dec 1, 2010.

Dec 29, 2015

Download

Documents

Mae Simon
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: The Mathematics of the Electoral College E. Arthur Robinson, Jr. (with Daniel Ullman) Dec 1, 2010.

The Mathematics of the Electoral College

E. Arthur Robinson, Jr.(with Daniel Ullman)

Dec 1, 2010

Page 2: The Mathematics of the Electoral College E. Arthur Robinson, Jr. (with Daniel Ullman) Dec 1, 2010.

Because we had it last election, and it wasn’t changed.

Why do we have an Electoral College?

Page 3: The Mathematics of the Electoral College E. Arthur Robinson, Jr. (with Daniel Ullman) Dec 1, 2010.

Because it’s in the Constitution.

Why did we have the Electoral College last election?

Page 4: The Mathematics of the Electoral College E. Arthur Robinson, Jr. (with Daniel Ullman) Dec 1, 2010.

Because, in the 18th century: communication and transportation

were primitive; the US was vast and sparsely

populated; campaigning was regarded as

inappropriate; a public mandate was regarded as

dangerous.

Why did our founding parents devise an Electoral College system?

Page 5: The Mathematics of the Electoral College E. Arthur Robinson, Jr. (with Daniel Ullman) Dec 1, 2010.

Are senators elected directly?

Yes, they are now. Not in the original Constitution. Were appointed by state legislatures. Changed by 17th Amendment (1913). Justice Scalia: This “mistake” started

a “decline in so-called states rights” (Nov. 13, 2010, Texas Tech. Law School).

Page 6: The Mathematics of the Electoral College E. Arthur Robinson, Jr. (with Daniel Ullman) Dec 1, 2010.

Yes. Failure of anonymity. Not every voter has the same

degree of influence over the final decision, violating the principle of “one person, one vote”.

Other concerns: Focus on swing states; Discourages turnout.

Is there a problem with the Electoral College?

Page 7: The Mathematics of the Electoral College E. Arthur Robinson, Jr. (with Daniel Ullman) Dec 1, 2010.

¾ of the states must ratify a Constitutional amendment.

Most states are small. Electoral college perceived to favor

small states. They are unlikely to ratify an

amendment that removes their “advantage”.

Why hasn’t the Electoral College been abolished?

Page 8: The Mathematics of the Electoral College E. Arthur Robinson, Jr. (with Daniel Ullman) Dec 1, 2010.

The Electoral Map

Page 9: The Mathematics of the Electoral College E. Arthur Robinson, Jr. (with Daniel Ullman) Dec 1, 2010.

The Election of 2008

Page 10: The Mathematics of the Electoral College E. Arthur Robinson, Jr. (with Daniel Ullman) Dec 1, 2010.

The same picture, in Electoral units

Page 11: The Mathematics of the Electoral College E. Arthur Robinson, Jr. (with Daniel Ullman) Dec 1, 2010.

The Election of 2008

Page 12: The Mathematics of the Electoral College E. Arthur Robinson, Jr. (with Daniel Ullman) Dec 1, 2010.

2004 Electoral map

Page 13: The Mathematics of the Electoral College E. Arthur Robinson, Jr. (with Daniel Ullman) Dec 1, 2010.

2000 Electoral map

Page 14: The Mathematics of the Electoral College E. Arthur Robinson, Jr. (with Daniel Ullman) Dec 1, 2010.

When has Electoral College differed from “Popular Vote”?

1876: Rutherford B Hayes wins EC 185 to 184. Samuel J. Tilden won 51.5% of popular vote.

1888: Benjamin Harrison wins EC 201 to 200. Grover Cleveland wins plurality in popular vote.

2000: George W Bush wins EC 271 to 267. Al Gore wins majority of popular vote (Supreme Court gives Florida’s 25 votes to Bush).

Page 15: The Mathematics of the Electoral College E. Arthur Robinson, Jr. (with Daniel Ullman) Dec 1, 2010.

National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (began 2007).

States agree to allocate their electoral votes according to national popular election winner.

Article II gives states right to appoint electors as they see fit.

Six states have joined. MD, NJ, IL, HW, WA, MA.

Takes effect when states with 270 votes join.

Page 16: The Mathematics of the Electoral College E. Arthur Robinson, Jr. (with Daniel Ullman) Dec 1, 2010.

What’s wrong with “caucusing”?

Example: The Supreme Court (9 justices)

How 5 Justices can dominate the Court.

How 3 Justices can dominate the Court.

How 2 Justices can dominate the Court.

Page 17: The Mathematics of the Electoral College E. Arthur Robinson, Jr. (with Daniel Ullman) Dec 1, 2010.

What’s wrong with “weighted voting”?

Example: The European Economic Community of 1958.

Votes: France 4, Germany 4, Italy 4, Belgium 2, The Netherlands 2, and Luxembourg 1.

12 votes out of 17 were needed to pass resolutions in the Council.

Page 18: The Mathematics of the Electoral College E. Arthur Robinson, Jr. (with Daniel Ullman) Dec 1, 2010.

How do we measure voter “power”?

How important is your vote? When does your vote really matter?

How likely is it that your vote actually matters in the end?

(Not very.) What is the probability that a voter

in a state with population p casts a deciding vote?

Page 19: The Mathematics of the Electoral College E. Arthur Robinson, Jr. (with Daniel Ullman) Dec 1, 2010.

Banzhaf power

Invented by John Banzhaf, now GW Law Professor in 1960’s.

Used to analyze Nassau County, NY Board of Supervisors.

Lawsuit on behalf of some citizens who believed they were under-represented.

Later applied analysis to Electoral College.

Page 20: The Mathematics of the Electoral College E. Arthur Robinson, Jr. (with Daniel Ullman) Dec 1, 2010.

Banzhaf power

Assume not all voters have same “power”.

Collect voters who favor one candidate into a coalition.

Coalition is winning if it has the votes to elect its candidate.

Winning coalition member is critical if his/her vote is necessary to win.

Page 21: The Mathematics of the Electoral College E. Arthur Robinson, Jr. (with Daniel Ullman) Dec 1, 2010.

European Economic Community of 1958. 12 votes to win.

Country Votes

France 4

Germany 4

Italy 4

Belgium 2

Netherlands 2

Luxembourg 1

Page 22: The Mathematics of the Electoral College E. Arthur Robinson, Jr. (with Daniel Ullman) Dec 1, 2010.

Winning Coalitions

Page 23: The Mathematics of the Electoral College E. Arthur Robinson, Jr. (with Daniel Ullman) Dec 1, 2010.

European Economic Community of 1958. 12 votes to win.

Country Votes Banzhaf Power

France 4 10

Germany 4 10

Italy 4 10

Belgium 2 6

Netherlands 2 6

Luxembourg 1 0

Page 24: The Mathematics of the Electoral College E. Arthur Robinson, Jr. (with Daniel Ullman) Dec 1, 2010.

Senate 2001

Senate starts with 50 Democrats and 50 Republicans + 1 (VP Dick Cheney--Republican)

Jim Jeffords (R-Vt) becomes Indepandent

New count: 50 Democrats, 50 Republicans, 1 Independent

51 votes needed to pass bill.

Page 25: The Mathematics of the Electoral College E. Arthur Robinson, Jr. (with Daniel Ullman) Dec 1, 2010.

Jim Jeffords’ Senate

Page 26: The Mathematics of the Electoral College E. Arthur Robinson, Jr. (with Daniel Ullman) Dec 1, 2010.

Senate 2001

Party Votes Banzhaf Power

R 49+1 2

D 50 2

I 1 2