THE INSTITUTE ON INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS & ASSESSMENT “WRITING EDUCATIONAL (a.k.a.: STUDENT LEARNING) OBJECTIVES” University Library Multi-Purpose Room, Second Floor Wednesday, October 31, 2007 1:00 p.m. – 3:00 p.m. Eva J. Harris Coordinator, Institutional Effectiveness & Assessment [email protected](318) 429-7220
22
Embed
THE INSTITUTE ON INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS & ASSESSMENT “WRITING EDUCATIONAL (a.k.a.: STUDENT LEARNING) OBJECTIVES” University Library Multi-Purpose.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
OUTCOME STATEMENT: A. Students will….. B. Learn what ….. C. Under these circumstances/conditions D. This level of efficiency/effectiveness Outcome Statement: Outcome Statement:
Preparation of I. E. Form 1SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY AT SHREVEPORT
INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS REPORT
3. The results of assessment the department
will discuss & determine a
course of action to improve
upon those results.
1. What do you expect to
achieve with this
objective? What
results do you expect
to see at the end of
the year? What will
measure and verify
the achievement of
this objective?
2. Identify the measurable
outcomes that shows the
objective or goal has been
met. Summarizes results
from the assessments
conducted in that term
4. Adjustm
ents that re
sult from
reviewing the o
utcomes.
PAR-IEP -Harris, EJ (07-07)
SAMPLE
INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS REPORT
UNIT PLAN OF ACTION
UNIT GOALS:
1. To cultivate an awareness of assessment across the campus.
Objectives(Measurable)
Performance Indicators(Assessment Criteria)
Anticipated Performance Outcomes
(Assessment Results)
Methodologies Used Impact to University
1a. Participants of the
Spring Assessment
Workshop will indicate in the evaluation form that they understand the components of the Institutional Effectiveness process and educational outcomes assessment and that they find the Institutional Effectiveness Model useful.
2a. Administrative units, academic departments, as well as educational support programs will use the Guidelines for Institutional Effectiveness Planning to develop an institutional effectiveness plan in stating clear goals, measurable objectives, and evaluation methods by July 1st
1a. Linking administrative and academic unit performance to university strategic goals, intergovernmental mandates and accreditation standards.
1b. Enhanced data collection reflected through greater consistency in reporting. During the fund year schedule 70% of the respondents to a locally developed satisfaction with services survey responses will indicate that they “agree” or “strongly agree” with the Office of Institutional Effectiveness/Assessment’s use of the institutional effectiveness process and the Institutional Effectiveness Model.
80% of all participants will indicate in the evaluation form that they understood the components of the Institutional Effectiveness process and education outcomes assessment process.
2a. Participants will indicate the most meaningful thing they learned during the workshop.
1a. An evaluation form will be used to gather feedback from participants of the Spring Assessment workshop.
1b. The minute paper method will be used to gather what participants have learned and what questions they still have in mind.
Will provide continual review process to assess compliance with institution role, scope , mission, and
Inter- governmental mandates affecting Institutional Effectiveness and the University.
IEPU: _Office of Assessment Coordinator_________________REPORT PERIOD: _2007-2008________________________UNIT HEAD: _Mr. Martin Fortner_______________________
Preparation of I. E. Form 1
PAR-IEP -Harris, EJ (07-07)
Objectives(Measurable)
Performance Outcomes
(Assessment Results)
Tangible Evidence of Results
Recommendations(Barrier/Problems)
Impact to University
1a. Participants of the Spring Assessment
Workshop will indicate in the evaluation form that they understand the components of the Institutional Effectiveness process and educational outcomes assessment and that they find the Institutional Effectiveness Model useful.
1a. 85% of all participants indicated in the evaluation form that they understood the components of the Institutional Effectiveness process. However, participants still had questions regarding measurable objectives. Some felt that many of their objectives could not be easily measured.
1a. Responded through e-mails to questions raised in the minute papers.
1b. Met with department/program heads to address questions on Institutional Effectiveness planning.
1c. Will provide more examples of measurable objectives and educational outcomes in future workshops.
1d. Will continue to provide hands-on experience for future workshops.
1a. The Department of Planning, Assessment and Research team continue to provide leadership and support of all university units activities regarding Institutional Effectiveness organizational coordination and communication.
1b. To budget adequate funding to department administration to implement effective data reporting and collection.
1a. Keeping in compliance with Federal, State mandates,
University Self-Study Guide 2000, and Self-Study Follow-up Action Plan 2000, improved data management through consistent format reporting, database storage and integrative data sharing via Banner.
Critical Needs(If Applicable)
1a. Performance Based Budgeting System and Student Learning Outcome Assessment System software
(Mind Gate).
UNIT GOALS:
1. To cultivate an awareness of assessment across the campus.
IEPU: Office of Assessment Coordinator___________________REPORT PERIOD: _2007-2008________________________UNIT HEAD: Mr. Martin Fortner_________________________
Preparation of I. E. Form 1
INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS REPORT
SAMPLE
PAR-IEP -Harris, EJ (07-07)
To Summarize or Report
For each learning outcome: Describe what you did Report what you found Plan what you are going to do