This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
PMI Government Community of Practice
A Reference Guide to Material from
Reinventing Communication for Successful Projects
based on workshops conducted for PMI UK and APM at
Barclays in Glasgow, Intel in Swindon & ETC Venues in London
Source: Mark Phillips “Reinventing Communication” Gower 2014
6
Does the Communication Environment of Your Organization Impact Project
Performance?
YES
Source: ReinventingCommunication.com | Survey of over 200 participants in a project management webinar, November 2014
7
Does Your Organization Have a Good Communication Environment?
NO
Source: ReinventingCommunication.com | Survey of over 200 participants in a project management webinar, November 2014
8
– SCOPE: Organizations that are highly effective
communicators meet original project goals 80% of the
time. Minimally effective communicators meet original
project goals 52% of the time.
– SCHEDULE: Organizations that are highly effective
communicators are more likely to deliver projects on time:
71% of the time versus 37%.
– BUDGET: Organizations that are highly effective
communicators are more likely to deliver projects on
budget: 76% of the time versus 48%.
Source: PMI, Pulse of the Profession™ In-Depth Report: The Essential Role of Communications, PMI, 2013
9
– FAILURE: 1 out of 5 projects are unsuccessful due to
ineffective communication.
– RISK: Of the US$135 million at risk on every US$1 billion
spent on projects, US$75 million, over 50%, is on the line
because of poor communication.
• A bad communication environment creates mistrust among
people and an unproductive work environment.
• A bad communication reduces an organization’s solution
delivery capabilities.
Sources: PMI “Communication: The Message is Clear”, PMI White Paper, December 2013 | Johnson and Johnson, “Joining Together: Group Theory and Group Skills, 7th
Edition”, Allyn and Bacon, 2000 | Phillips, “Reinventing Communication: How to Design, Lead and Manage High Performing Projects”, Gower Publishing, 2014
10
The communication
environment determines how
people react when bumps
happen in the project.
Source: Reinventing Communication
11
The communication environment
determines what has been
surfaced beforehand and what
will be surfaced now.
Source: Reinventing Communication
12
A Bad Communication Environment Leads to
Miscommunication on Framing Assumptions
a leading cause of Nunn-McCurdy Breaches
Source: US DOD, PARCA “2013 Report on the Performance of the US Defense Acquisition System”
13
A Bad Communication Environment Leads to
Conflict and Mistrust
Source: Reinventing Communication | “The Cost of Conflict” Mark Phillips, EVM Europe 2013 Symposium Presentation
14
Conflict and Mistrust Cost Money and Time
Source: Reinventing Communication | “The Cost of Conflict” Mark Phillips, EVM Europe 2013 Symposium Presentation
15
Conflict arising during construction projects costs approximately
$11,000 per incident and 161 (20 days) hours of work time.
Managers spend 30% - 42% of their work time dealing with conflict.
For every hour spent resolving conflict, the average project is set
back 3 hours.
If 30% of the time is spent resolving conflict, that’s roughly 700
hours per year. If every hour sets back a project by 3 hours, that
translates into more than 2,100 hours of schedule delay and cost
per year.
And that increases the more sub-contractors and sub systems you
have in the program.
Sources: "The Cost of Interpersonal Conflict in Construction" Julie L. Brockman, Ph.D., Michigan State University, The Center for Construction Research and Training, December
2012 | Construction Management and Resolution by Peter Fenn and Rod Gamesone | “The Cost of Conflict” Mark Phillips, EVM Europe 2013 Symposium Presentation
16
Redefinition of Communication on Projects
Source: Mark Phillips “Reinventing Communication” Gower 2014
17Source: Mark Phillips “Reinventing Communication: How to Design, Lead and Manage High Performing Projects” Gower 2014
18Source: Mark Phillips “Reinventing Communication: How to Design, Lead and Manage High Performing Projects” Gower 2014
19
An effective budget spend moves the project forward, not simply
making sure the money reached the recipient’s bank account.
The same is true of communication.
Effective communication moves the project forward. It is not simply
that the communication was understood by the receiver.
Source: Reinventing Communication
20
As leaders
it is our job to be aware of the
communication environment
as a constraint, work within it and
seek to create
more effective communication
and a
more effective communication environment.
Source: Reinventing Communication
21
Communication impacts
scope, schedule, budget and risk.
Source: Reinventing Communication
22
How can we improve communication?
Communication Objects and
Communication Object Elements.
Source: Reinventing Communication
23
Communication Objects
Communication Objects are the artifacts generated by the
process of communication. A communication object is more than
the information it is meant to contain; it is made up of numerous
elements, including descriptors of the container itself. This is
much like how an in-person conversation between two people is
made up of non-verbal elements as well as the words in the
conversation. Communication Objects encompass the “non-
verbal” elements of communication and are a reflection of the
design of the communication environment.
Source: Mark Phillips “Reinventing Communication” Gower 2014 & ReinventingCommunication.com/glossary
24
Measurable
Communication Actions (MCA)
A Measurable Communication Action (MCA) is a single unit of measurement
of communication in an environment. It provides a means to measure and
integrate multiple communication methods, communication elements and
design decisions into a single unit of measurement. It can be made up of a
single method of communication or multiple methods of communication.
The methods can be added together, giving all methods equal weight, or
different methods can be weighted when combining them into an MCA. The
weighting can reflect variables such as the relative value management places
on each form of communication or the strictness with which communication
design decisions are enforced for each method of communication. It can
reflect the phase of the project or the expected activities for that period of
time. It can be tweaked to increase sensitivity towards one method of
communication over another to facilitate management awareness of
unpredicted behavior.
Source: Mark Phillips “Reinventing Communication” Gower 2014 & ReinventingCommunication.com/glossary