The Family Relationship Between Sabu, Rote,

8/18/2019 The Family Relationship Between Sabu, Rote,

1/40

THE FAMILY RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN

SABU, ROTE, TETUN, AND LAMAHOLOTLANGUAGES

Group 14

Ameli P!"u#

Fe$ri# Rm!%#&R#'i Fi'ri A#(r


2/40

INTRODU)TION

Language

organism that

have ecologicaland may changedue to the passage

of time (bdk.

Bolinger, (1974.

an inheritance oflanguage in the

past


3/40


4/40

+ssumption sorting genetically related to the

relationshipkinship relations is that -languages

belong to the same cluster have a rmcloser

relationship /hen compared /ith the language of

di0erence cluster.

*abu Language

'oteLanguage

!etunLanguage

LamaholotLanguage

Belong to theAustronesian family

are supposed to havea close kinship


5/40

)istorically

• !he people of 'ote and !etun have linkages /ith

the 2ehali 3ingdom.

•+ncestors of these three ethnics have a statement

of vo/ saying" Sabu Mau, Belu mau and Ti Mau,

prohibiting members of these three ethnics not to

get involved in a conict.

•Lamoholot ethnic become the history of relative

closeness bet/een !etun and Lamaholot


6/40

Linguistically

• !otal le$icon also sho/ similarities and

resemblance bet/een B*, B', B!, and BL.

Father has same form and meaning in B*,B', B!, and BL, i.e. Ama.

Mother *imilarly, mothers, /hich is in BLgloss called ina, ina in B*, inan in

B', and inan in B! are displaced.


7/40

'esearch #roblems and #urposes

!o calculate kognat /ord percentage that indicates

closeness to social relations bet/een B*, B', B!, and

BL.

)o/ much is the /ord percentage of family relationship

closeness among B*, B', B!, and BL5

!o describe the lineage and reect the kinship among B*,

B', B!, and BL based on the percentage of their family

relationship.

)o/ is the family relationship among B*, B', B!, and BLbased on the percentage of their familyrelationship5

!o calculate the year split among B*, B', B!, and BL from

fathers of those four languages.

2hen do B*, B', B!, and BL ancestors split from thelanguage5


8/40

REVIEW OF REA!E" I!ERA!#RE

our concepts that need to be claried related to

the study of kinship among B*, B', B!, and BL."

$% Basic Voca&ulary

3eraf (1991"16 say that the basic vocabulary are /ords that are

universal in all languages. 8t consists of 1 /ords and 6 /ordspurposed by :orris */adesh.

'% e(icostatistic

le$icostatistic is a techni;ue in /hich language groupings tend to

stress the observation of /ords (le$icon statistically, to then

strive to set the grouping based on the percentage of similarities

and di0erences in a language /ith other languages (3eraf,

1991"161


9/40

)% *lotto +hronology%lotto


10/40

PSRT PSRT

BS BR BT

BL BR BT

DWIPILAH

TE)HNI*UES

TRIPILAH TE)HNI*UES


11/40

'esearch :ethodology

'esearchmethodolo

gy

=uantitative

descriptive design

!he amily'elationshipbet/een *abu,

'ote, !etun,and Lamaholot

Languages

8t focuses tocalculate thepercentage

of therelationshipbet/een B*,B', B!, and

BL.

8f B*, B', B!,and BL have

a closerelationship,the analysis

of the data/ill use

gures /iththe

interpretation of the

gures inuestion.


12/40

• *tage ofdata

collection• >ataprocessing• #resentationof analysisresult

stages

asproposedby

*udaryanto

(in:ahsun,6?


13/40

!he data of the study is in form of basic*/adesh vocabulary, as many as 6 /ords

/hich /as collected by ;uestionnaire andintervie/ techni;ues.


14/40

@umber of similar /ords

6 (*/adesh vocabularyA1

ormula (1

tC

Log.<

6 log.r

ormula (6

t" split time in thousands yearsr" retention, or a constant percentage of the year in1 (inde$


15/40

*ources of the data are therespondents and informants /hich

are established by referring to*amarin (19DD, ??E7 /ith someadFustments, as follo/s"@ative speakers of B*, B', B! and BL.

:ale or female /ho are over years ofage.

&ducated, at least elementary school.

)aving a good memory.

)aving enough time and are /illing to ll thee;uivalent gloss of */adesh list.

2illing to be intervie/ed.


16/40

'esult and >isccussion

'esults

+nalysisle$icostatistics

+nalysisglottochronology

8t contains thecalculation of

percentage /hich ise;uipped /ith a matri$of kinship percentage.

8t contains calculationsand guesstimate of thesplit year bet/een theB*, B', B! and BL, as/ell as the matri$ ofthe split year amongthe four languages.


17/40


18/40


19/40


20/40


21/40


22/40


23/40

B2

17,

1?

16,?

BR

64,?

1?

B!

17 B

#ercentage of kinship above can be described in four languageskinship matri$ percentages (BL, B*, B', and B!, as sho/n

belo/"


24/40

%lottochronology +nalysis

Iear of *eparation bet/een B*EB'

tC

log.,17?6.log.D,?

C,7H

,141

C?,9

?,9 $ 1 C0)34

Iear splitbet/een B* and

B' is ?9years ago.

616 J ?9 C7D B<


25/40

Iear of *eparation bet/een B*EB!

H,D$ 1 C5)6)

Iear splitbet/een B* andB' is HDyears ago.

616 J HD C471 B<

t CH,D


26/40

Iear of *eparation bet/een B*EBL

H,6D$ 1 C54'6

Iear splitbet/een B* andB' is H6Dyears ago.

616 J H6D C41H B<

t CH,6D


27/40

• Iear of *eparation bet/een B'EB!

4,6H $ 1 C46H

Iear splitbet/een B* andB' is 46Hyears ago.

616 J 46H C614 B<

t C4,6H


28/40

Iear of *eparation bet/een B'EBL

?,D1? $ 1 C?D1?

Iear splitbet/een B* andB' is ?D1?years ago.

616 J ?D1? CD B<

t C?,D1?


29/40

Iear of *eparation bet/een B!EBL

?,4H $ 1 C?4H

Iear splitbet/een B* andB' is ?4Hyears ago.

616 J ?4H C44D B<

t C?,4H


30/40

B2

7D *:

471 *:

41H *:

BR

614 *:

D *:

B!

44D *: B

:atri$ Iear *eparation comparable bet/een B*, B', B!, and BL,as follo/s"


31/40

>iscussion

!he Level of


32/40

!he Level le$icon identical bet/een B*, B',B!, and BL"

a. B* and B' as H /ords, that is gloss"

• api (re aiM

• bakar (burn tunuM

• ibu (mothers inaM

• perempuan (/omen inaM

• ayah (fathers amaM

• tiga (three teluM


33/40


b. B* and B! as much as 6 /ords, that is

gloss"



c. B* and BL as much as ? /ords, the gloss"

• anak (kids anaM

•

ayah (fathers amaM• ibu (mothers inaM

• merah (red meaM

•

tiga (three teluM


34/40


d. B' and B! is 14 /ords, that

is gloss"

• +ngin (/ind aninM

• +pa (/hat saM

•

+yah (father amaM• Batu (rock fatuM

• Benih (seed niM

• BerFalan (/alk laoM

• >engan (/ith noM

• )uFan (rain udanM

• 8bu (mother inaM

•

3uning (yello/ modokM

• Laut (sea tasiM

• :ati (die mateM

• :untah (thro/ up mutaM

•

!angan (hand limanM


35/40


e. B' and BL as much as ? /ords, that is gloss"



• :ati (die mateM

•

Nlar (snake ulaM• !angan (hand limanM

f. B! and BL as much as H /ords, the gloss"

• >ua (t/o ruaM



• Benar (right /anaM

•

:ati (die mateM

• @ama (name

naranM

• !elinga (ears

tilunM


36/40


b. B* and B! as much as 6 /ords, that is

gloss"



c. B* and BL as much as ? /ords, the gloss"

• anak (kids anaM

•

ayah (fathers amaM• ibu (mothers inaM

• merah (red meaM

•

tiga (three teluM

!h L l f


37/40

!he Level of


38/40

p p g p gcorrespondence O2E,OE/EB*POf(vE,B',B!.*loss B2 BR B! B

benihM 2ini ini ini :nea

(memberiM

2ie e o @ein

baruM 2o/iu Qeu oun 2uu

batuM 2o/adufatuM

atu 2uto

!he highest closeness B' and B! G OdE,OE>EB*POt,OEtEB',B!,BL

*loss B2 BR B! B

taliM >ari !ali !ali !ale

telurM >elo !elu !olun !elu

hati +de +te +ten Knek

kutuM Ndu )utu Ntu 3uto

matiM :ade :ate :ate :ate

putihM :udi :uti :uti Bura


39/40


40/40

*uggestions

1. our subse;uent researchers to e$plore the relationship

bet/een B*, B', B!, and BL by tracing the shape of the

le$icon of proto phoneme based determinationG things that

have not been reached in this study.

6. Qariety of characteristics in diachronic change across

languages le$icon must be /orked to enrich the kno/ledge

about the various symptoms that may change.

The Family Relationship Between Sabu, Rote,

Documents