The Evolution of AGN Obscuration Ezequiel Treister (ESO) Meg Urry (Yale) Julian Krolik (JHU) Shanil Virani (Yale) Eric Gawiser (Rutgers)
Feb 23, 2016
The Evolution of AGN Obscuration
Ezequiel Treister (ESO)Meg Urry (Yale)
Julian Krolik (JHU)Shanil Virani (Yale)
Eric Gawiser (Rutgers)
The AGN Unified Model
blazars, Type 1 Sy/QSObroad lines
Urry & Padovani, 1995
The AGN Unified Modelradio galaxies, Type 2 Sy/QSOnarrow lines
Urry & Padovani, 1995
Supermassive Black Holes
Credit: ESO/NASA, the AVO project and Paolo Padovani
Many obscured by gas and dust
How do we know that? Local AGN Unification
Explain Extragalactic X-ray “Background”
Observed X-ray “Background”
Frontera et al. (2006)
AGN in X-rays
Increasing NH
Photoelectric absorptionaffect mostly low energy emission making the observed spectrum look harder.
X-ray Background
Treister & Urry, 2005
XRB well explained using a combination of obscured and unobscured AGN.
• Setti & Woltjer 1989• Madau et al. 1994• Comastri et al. 1995• Gilli et al. 1999,2001• And others…
# w NH > 1023 cm-
2
still uncertain.
Multiwavelength Surveys• Hard X-rays penetrate most obscuration
• Energy re-radiated in infrared• High resolution optical separates host galaxy,
constrains redshifts
E-CDF-S• Chandra Coverage• 0.25 deg2
• FX=~10-16erg cm-2s-1
• ~800 X-ray sources
COSMOS• XMM+Chandra Coverage• 2 deg2
• FX=~10-15erg cm-2s-1
• ~1100 X-ray sources
Extended Chandra Deep Field South
(optical)
Extended Chandra Deep Field South
(x-rays)
Hardness Ratio vs. Luminosity
More unobscuredAGN at high X-ray luminosity?
Treister et al in prep.
NH vs. LuminosityIn general goodagreement betweenoptical and X-rayclassification.
Treister et al in prep.
NH vs. RedshiftObscuration increases with redshift?
Or selection effect due to X-rays K correction?
Treister et al in prep.
HST ACS color image (0.3% of GOODS)
HST+Spitzer color image (0.3% of GOODS)
IR Fraction vs Flux
Treister et al 2006
AGN are bright IR sources!
IR Luminosity Distribution
Treister et al 2006
On average, AGN are ~10x brighter than normal galaxies
For fainter AGN, the host galaxy makes a significant contribution
X-Ray to mid-IR Ratio Significant separation between obscured and unobscured sources.
Smaller separation at shorter wavelength (host galaxy) and largest at longer wavelength (self-absorption).
Treister et al in prep.
Unobscured QSO Template
Obscured QSO Template
X-Ray to mid-IR Ratio More separation at lower luminosities.
Change in the opening angle with luminosity? Larger opening angle, ie less self-absorption.
Treister et al in prep.
Infrared Background
Treister et al 2006
AGN (+ host galaxy) contribute ~3-10% of the total extragalactic background light
NH Distribution:What do we know so
far?• More obscured AGN at low luminosity (Steffen et
al. 2003, Ueda et al. 2003, Barger et al. 2005, Akylas et al. 2006)
• More obscured AGN at high-z? (Ueda et al. 2003: No, La Franca et al. 2005: yes, Ballantyne et al. 2006: yes)Problems:• Low number of sources• Selection effects: - X-ray selection (missed obscured sources) - Optical incompleteness (no redshifts) - X-ray classification: “K correction”
Meta-Survey
• 7 Surveys, • 2341 AGN, 1229 w
Ids• 631 Obscured (no broad lines)• 1042<Lx<1046,
0<z<5
Treister & Urry, 2006
Total effective area of meta-survey
Treister & Urry, 2006
Ratio vs Redshift
Treister & Urry, 2006
Ratio vs Redshift
Treister & Urry, 2006
Ratio vs Redshift
Treister & Urry, 2006
Ratio vs Redshift
See also:La Franca et al. 2005Ballantyne et al. 2006Akylas et al. 2006
Key input: Luminosity dependence of obscured AGN fraction.
Treister & Urry, 2006
Ratio vs Luminosity
Treister & Urry, 2006
Ratio vs Luminosity
Treister & Urry, 2006
Ratio vs Luminosity
Treister & Urry, 2006
Hasinger et al.
The AGN Unified Model
Urry & Padovani, 1995
obsc
obsc
bol
IR
ff
LL
1
Torus StructureSample
Completely unobscured AGNNarrow redshift range, 0.8<z<1.2Wide range in luminosityData at 24 µm from Spitzer
High L• SDSS DR5 Quasar sample• 11938 quasars, 0.8<z<1.2• 192 with Spitzer 24 µm photometry• 157 of them with GALEX UV data
Low L• GOODS: North+South fields• 10 unobscured AGN• All Spitzer 24 µm photometry• 8 with GALEX UV data
Mid L• COSMOS• 19 unobscured AGN• 14 Spitzer 24 µm photometry• All with GALEX UV data
Torus StructureBolometric luminosityconstructed from NUVto mid-IR.
No change in NUV/Bolratio with luminosity!
Treister et al. 2008
Torus StructureChange in 24 µm/Bolratio with luminosity!
Lower ratio at high L Consistent with larger opening anglesat higher luminosities.
Treister et al. 2008
Fraction of Obscured AGNSimilar luminositydependence as foundon X-ray surveys.
Higher values from fIR/fbol method. Obscured AGNmissed by X-raysurveys.
Treister et al. 2008
Compton Thick AGN Defined as obscured sources with NH>1024 cm-2. Very hard to find (even in X-rays). Observed locally and needed to explain the X-ray background. Number density highly uncertain. High energy (E>10 keV) observations are required to find them.
INTEGRAL Survey• PIs: Meg Urry, Shanil Virani, Ezequiel Treister• Exp. Time (Msec): 0.7 (archive)+1.5 (2005)+ 1
(2008). Deepest extragalactic INTEGRAL survey• Field: XMM-LSS (largest XMM field)• Flux limit: ~4x10-12 ergs cm-2 s-1 (20-40 keV)• Area: ~1,000 deg2
• Sources: ~20• Obscured AGN: ~15 (~5 Compton-thick)
INTEGRAL Mosaic (2.2 Ms)
Significance Image, 20-50 keV
MCG-02-08-014
MCG-02-08-014• z=0.0168• Optical class: Galaxy• IR source (IRAS)• Radio source (NVSS)• Narrow line AGN (based on OIII emission)• No soft X-rays (ROSAT)• Good CT AGN candidate
Space Density of CT AGN
Treister et al, submitted
X-ray background does not constrain density of CT AGN
CT AGN and the XRB
Treister et al, submitted
XRB Intensity
HEAO-1 +40%
Treister & Urry, 2005
CT AGN and the XRB
Treister et al, submitted
XRB IntensityHEAO-1 OriginalHEAO-1 +10%HEAO-1 +40%
Treister & Urry, 2005
Gilli et al. 2007
CT AGN and the XRB
Treister et al, submitted
XRB IntensityHEAO-1 OriginalHEAO-1 +10%HEAO-1 +40%
Treister & Urry, 2005
CT AGN Space Density
Most likely solution
Gilli et al. 2007
X-ray Background Synthesis
NH Distribution
SummaryAGN unification can account well for the observed
properties of the X-ray background.AGN are luminous infrared sources, but contribute ~5%
to extragalactic infrared backgroundThe obscured AGN fraction decreases with increasing
luminosity. Ratio of IR to Bolometric luminosity in unobscured AGN
suggest this is due to a change in opening angle.The obscured AGN fraction increases with redshift as
(1+z)0.4.Survey at high energies starts to constrain the spatial
density of CT AGN.
SBH Spatial Density
Natarajan & Treister, in prep
XRB Intensity
Ratio vs Luminosity
Treister & Urry, 2006
Luminosity vs Redshift
Treister & Urry, 2006
Incompleteness Effects
Treister & Urry, 2006
redshifts of Chandra deep X-ray sourcesGOODS-N
Barger et al. 2002,3, Hasinger et al. 2002, Szokoly et al. 2004
R<24GOODS-NModelR<24
Dust emission models from Nenkova et al. 2002, Elitzur et al. 2003Simplest dust distribution that satisfies
NH = 1020 – 1025 cm-2
3:1 ratio (divide at 1022 cm-2)Random angles NH distribution
NH=1025cm-2
NH=1022cm-2
NH=1020cm-2
Space Density of CT AGN
Treister et al, submitted
Strong degeneracy between reflection component and number of CT AGN.