Top Banner
The Effects of The Effects of Domestication on Domestication on Competitive Dominance Competitive Dominance of Juvenile Spring of Juvenile Spring Chinook Salmon Chinook Salmon Todd Pearsons, Anthony Fritts, Jennifer Scott, and Jordan Vandal Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
21

The Effects of Domestication on Competitive Dominance of Juvenile Spring Chinook Salmon

Feb 01, 2016

Download

Documents

Aimee

The Effects of Domestication on Competitive Dominance of Juvenile Spring Chinook Salmon. Todd Pearsons, Anthony Fritts, Jennifer Scott, and Jordan Vandal Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. offspring of hatchery fish to be dominant in scramble competition. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: The Effects of Domestication on Competitive Dominance of Juvenile Spring Chinook Salmon

The Effects of Domestication The Effects of Domestication on Competitive Dominance of on Competitive Dominance of

Juvenile Spring Chinook Juvenile Spring Chinook SalmonSalmon

Todd Pearsons, Anthony Fritts, Jennifer Scott, and Jordan Vandal

Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife

Page 2: The Effects of Domestication on Competitive Dominance of Juvenile Spring Chinook Salmon
Page 3: The Effects of Domestication on Competitive Dominance of Juvenile Spring Chinook Salmon
Page 4: The Effects of Domestication on Competitive Dominance of Juvenile Spring Chinook Salmon

If domestication does occur, If domestication does occur, we would expect… we would expect…

offspring of hatchery fish to be dominant in scramble competition

offspring of wild fish to be dominant in contest competition

Page 5: The Effects of Domestication on Competitive Dominance of Juvenile Spring Chinook Salmon

PurposePurpose

Compare dominance, aggression, and growth among offspring of three different lines of Yakima basin spring Chinook salmon that vary in hatchery ancestry (contest and scramble competition)

Page 6: The Effects of Domestication on Competitive Dominance of Juvenile Spring Chinook Salmon

Three lines comparedThree lines compared

Naches (N) – offspring of adults from the Naches basin; no artificial propagation

Supplementation (S) – offspring of natural origin adults in supplemented population of the upper Yakima (“S” fish were wild in 2003 and 2004)

Hatchery (H) – offspring of hatchery origin adults in the upper Yakima (2007 begins the second generation)

Page 7: The Effects of Domestication on Competitive Dominance of Juvenile Spring Chinook Salmon

MethodsMethods

Common garden experiment Experiments were conducted for 7 days in

80, 30 gallon glass aquaria Measured dominance, aggression, and

growth among paired fish (S vs N, S vs H, N vs H)

Page 8: The Effects of Domestication on Competitive Dominance of Juvenile Spring Chinook Salmon

Experimental ArenasExperimental Arenas

Contest – one good spot Scramble – all spots equal

Page 9: The Effects of Domestication on Competitive Dominance of Juvenile Spring Chinook Salmon
Page 10: The Effects of Domestication on Competitive Dominance of Juvenile Spring Chinook Salmon

ReplicatesReplicates

Comp. 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total

Contest

(SvN, SvH, NvH)

229 276 811 617 1933

Scramble

(SvH)

97 266 0 376 739

Page 11: The Effects of Domestication on Competitive Dominance of Juvenile Spring Chinook Salmon

Percent Dominance - ContestPercent Dominance - Contest

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

2003 2004 2005 2006

Per

cen

t D

om

inan

ce

S > N

S > H

N > H

Page 12: The Effects of Domestication on Competitive Dominance of Juvenile Spring Chinook Salmon

Aggression – ContestAggression – Contest(difference in interaction rate)(difference in interaction rate)

-0.3

-0.2

-0.1

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

2003 2004 2005 2006

Inte

ract

ion

/Fis

h/M

inu

te

S > N

S > H

N > H

Page 13: The Effects of Domestication on Competitive Dominance of Juvenile Spring Chinook Salmon

Growth – ContestGrowth – Contest(difference in growth rate, mg)(difference in growth rate, mg)

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

2003 2004 2005 2006Gro

wth

(m

g)

S > N

S > H

N > H

Page 14: The Effects of Domestication on Competitive Dominance of Juvenile Spring Chinook Salmon

Summary - ContestSummary - Contest

Results were similar between 2003-2005 and revealed that aggression and growth were significantly higher in offspring of wild/supp than hatchery origin fish

Reversal of results in 2006 which appears to be from offspring of Hatchery line

Page 15: The Effects of Domestication on Competitive Dominance of Juvenile Spring Chinook Salmon

Percent Dominance - Percent Dominance - ScrambleScramble

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2003 2004 2006

Per

cen

t D

om

inan

ce

S > H

Page 16: The Effects of Domestication on Competitive Dominance of Juvenile Spring Chinook Salmon

Aggression – ScrambleAggression – Scramble (difference in interaction rate) (difference in interaction rate)

-0.5

-0.4

-0.3

-0.2

-0.1

0

0.1

0.2

2003 2004 2006

Inte

ract

ion

/Fis

h/M

inu

te

S > H

Page 17: The Effects of Domestication on Competitive Dominance of Juvenile Spring Chinook Salmon

Growth – ScrambleGrowth – Scramble(difference in growth rate, mg)(difference in growth rate, mg)

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

2003 2004 2006

Gro

wth

(m

g)

S > H

Page 18: The Effects of Domestication on Competitive Dominance of Juvenile Spring Chinook Salmon

Summary - ScrambleSummary - Scramble

Offspring of hatchery line were more dominant than offspring of S fish in 2006, but not in 2003 and 2004

Offspring of wild fish were more aggressive in scramble replicates in 2003 and 2004, but the opposite was true in 2006

hatchery origin fish lost less weight than wild origin fish in 2003 and 2004, but not in 2006

Page 19: The Effects of Domestication on Competitive Dominance of Juvenile Spring Chinook Salmon

ImplicationsImplications

Significant deviations in behavior may occur among years which could result in more years to detect overall differences

Few studies have reported temporal variation in behavioral dominance (assumed constant across years) or used large numbers of parents so reported differences could be due to temporal differences or family effects

Page 20: The Effects of Domestication on Competitive Dominance of Juvenile Spring Chinook Salmon

AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements

Staff at CESRF (Charles Strom et al.) Marilee Webster, Josh McCarty, Germaine

Hart, Charity Davidson, Keith Pitts, Natalia Pitts, Tim Webster, Kurt Saltzman, Kevin Mahoney, Bryan Johnson

David Byrnes and Patty Smith and Bonneville Power Administration

Page 21: The Effects of Domestication on Competitive Dominance of Juvenile Spring Chinook Salmon

DomesticationDomestication

Raising fish in hatcheries can cause unintended behavioral changes in salmonids due to domestication selection

Change in genetics due to selection in an artificial environment; Natural selection in an artificial environment