The Council of Chief State School Officers State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness (SCEE) February 14, 2012 Implementing Your Educator Effectiveness.

The Council of Chief State School Officers

State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness (SCEE)

February 14, 2012

Implementing Your Educator Effectiveness Agenda

Webinar Logistics

Everyone is muted

Use the chat function to make a comment or ask a question

You may chat privately with individuals on your team

If you have problems, you may send William Bentgen a message via the chat function or an email at [email protected]

2

Welcome

Janice Poda, CCSSO

Initiative Director Education Workforce

3

Bobbi Burnham, CPEP Project , Office of the Deputy Commissioner

Steve Dibb, Director of the Division of School Support

Debbi Luedtke, Professional Development-Q Comp TAP, Supervisor, Division of School Support

Minnesota Department of Education Participants

4

North Carolina & NIRN Participants

Amy Scrinzi, K-5 Mathematics, North Carolina Department of Public Instruction

Dan Tetreault, K-5 English Language Arts, North Carolina Department of Public Instruction

Dean Fixsen, Ph.D., Senior Scientist, Co-Director and Founding Member, National Implementation Research Network

Barbara Sims, Associate Director, National Implementation Research Network

5

State Implementation & Scaling-up of Evidence-based Practices (SISEP)

Current methods for encouraging the use of evidence-based programs and other innovations in education are insufficient

Islands of excellence

Implementation science and best practices are universal and apply equally well in education

A sea of change

6

Evidence-base Actual SupportsYears 1-3

OutcomesYears 4-5

Every Teacher Trained

Fewer than 50% of the teachers received some training

Fewer than 10% of the schools used the CSR as intended

Every Teacher Continually Supported

Fewer than 25% of those teachers received support

Vast majority of students did not benefit

Aladjem & Borman, 2006; Vernez, Karam, Mariano, & DeMartini, 2006

Longitudinal Studies of a Variety of Comprehensive School Reforms

Implementation Science

7

Formula for Success

Effective intervention

X

Effective implementation

=

Effective outcomes

0.97

0.03

0.03

X

8

© Fixsen & Blase, 2008

All Students & Families


School Teachers and

Staff

School Teachers and

Staff

StateDepartment Leadership


1 for each SchoolBuilding

Implementation Team

Building Implementation

Team

Implementation-Skilled Workforce

Staff with special implementation skills

Re

-Pu

rpo

se

“District” Implementation

Teams


Teams1 for every group of 15-25 Schools

Regional Implementation

Teams


Teams

1 for every group of 4 “Districts”

Adult interactions produce Student benefits

9

Implementation Team

Regional, District, Building Teams

Know innovations very well (formal and craft knowledge)

Know implementation very well (formal and craft knowledge)

Know improvement cycles to make interventions and implementation methods more effective and efficient over time

10

Impl. Team NO Impl. Team

Effective

Effective use of Implementation Science & Practice

IMPLEMENTATION

INT

ER

VE

NT

ION

80%, 3 Yrs 14%, 17 Yrs

Balas & Boren, 2000 Green & Seifert, 2005

Fixsen, Blase, Timbers, & Wolf, 2001

Letting it Happen Helping it Happen

Implementation Team

11

YEARS

AM

OU

NT

S

Funding

Cap

acity

Implementation TeamsOrganization ChangeSystem Reinvention

Capacity Building

12

Defined and Measureable Goals

Evidence-Based PracticesData-Driven Decision MakingTiered Levels of Support that

Accelerate the Learning of ALL Students

Implementation of Instruction/Intervention as Intended

Culturally Responsive Teaching and Learning

Aligned with MN Pre K-12 State and Local Academic Standards

Parent and Community Engagement

Stages of Implementation (exploration and adoption, program installation, innovation/refinement, sustainability)

Core Implementation Components (staff selection, training, coaching, evaluation, systems intervention)

Leadership at ALL levels (technical and adaptive)

Coherent Alignment of Policies and Practices (implementation teams, continuous feedback loop, shared vision, collaboration, data support, professional development)

Principles of

Effective Practice (“What”)

Key Components of

Implementation (“How”)

MN Common Principles of Effective Practice (CPEP)


Coaching

Training

Selection

Integrated & Compensatory

Com

pete

ncy

Driv

ers

Com

pete

ncy

Driv

ers Systems

Intervention

Facilitative Administration

Decision Support Data System

Organization D

rivers

Organization D

rivers

AdaptiveTechnical

Leadership DriversLeadership Drivers

Performance Assessment (fidelity)

Impl

emen

tatio

n

Dri

vers

Consistent uses of Innovations Interventions

meetImplementation

Reliable Student Benefits

14


Coaching

Training

Selection

Integrated & Compensatory

Com

pete

ncy

Driv

ers

Com

pete

ncy

Driv

ers Systems

Intervention

Facilitative Administration

Decision Support Data System

Organization D

rivers

Organization D

rivers

AdaptiveTechnical

Leadership DriversLeadership Drivers

Performance Assessment (fidelity)

Impl

emen

tatio

n

Dri

vers

Consistent uses of Innovations Interventions

meetImplementation

Reliable Student Benefits

15

Impro

vem

ent

Cycl

es

16

Implementation Team

StateManagement

Team

TeachersInnovations

Students

Sys

tem

C

han

ge

Adaptive Challenges• Duplication• Fragmentation• Hiring criteria• Salaries• Credentialing• Licensing• Time/ scheduling• Union contracts• RFP methods• Federal/ State laws

SIS

EP

Sy

ste

m C

han

ge

Su

pp

ort

Pra

ctic

e-

Po

licy

C

om

mu

nic

ati

on

Cy

cle

Po

licy

Su

pp

orts

Effe

ctive

Pra

ctice

System Reinvention

17


System Reinvention

Implementation Team

StateManagement

Team

TeachersInnovations

Students

Sys

tem

C

han

ge

SIS

EP

Sy

ste

m C

han

ge

Su

pp

ort

Pra

ctic

e-

Po

licy

C

om

mu

nic

ati

on

Cy

cle

Po

licy

Su

pp

orts

Effe

ctive

Pra

ctice

18

Implementation Team

StateManagement

Team

TeachersInnovations

Students


System Reinvention

SIS

EP

Sy

ste

m C

han

ge

Su

pp

ort

Sys

tem

C

han

ge

Pra

ctic

e-

Po

licy

C

om

mu

nic

ati

on

Cy

cle

Po

licy

Su

pp

orts

Effe

ctive

Pra

ctice

19

Pra

ctic

e-

Po

licy

C

om

mu

nic

ati

on

Cy

cle

Po

licy

Su

pp

orts

Effe

ctive

Pra

ctice

System Reinvention

SIS

EP

Sy

ste

m C

han

ge

Su

pp

ort

Implementation Team

StateManagement

Team

TeachersInnovations

Students

Sys

tem

C

han

ge


20

Implementation Team

StateManagement

Team

TeachersInnovations

Students

Sys

tem

C

han

ge


SIS

EP

Sy

ste

m C

han

ge

Su

pp

ort

Pra

ctic

e-

Po

licy

C

om

mu

nic

ati

on

Cy

cle

Po

licy

Su

pp

orts

Effe

ctive

Pra

ctice

System Reinvention

21

Implementation Team

StateManagement

Team

TeachersInnovations

Students

Sys

tem

C

han

ge


SIS

EP

Sy

ste

m C

han

ge

Su

pp

ort

Pra

ctic

e-

Po

licy

C

om

mu

nic

ati

on

Cy

cle

Po

licy

Su

pp

orts

Effe

ctive

Pra

ctice

System Reinvention

22




School Teachers and

Staff

School Teachers and

Staff




Team


Team


Teams


Teams


Teams


TeamsTransformation Zone

A vertical slice of the system

23

For More Information

Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. 919-966-3892 [email protected]

Karen A. Blase, Ph.D. 919-966-9050 [email protected]

Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute

University of North Carolina

Chapel Hill, NC

http://nirn.fpg.unc.edu/ www.scalingup.org

www.implementationconference.org

24

mailto:[email protected]


http://nirn.fpg.unc.edu/

http://www.scalingup.org/

http://www.implementationconference.org/

Implementation Science

Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M. & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the Literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network (FMHI Publication #231).Download all or part of the monograph at:http://www.fpg.unc.edu/~nirn/resources/detail.cfm?resourceID=31

Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the Literature

25

http://www.fpg.unc.edu/~nirn/resources/detail.cfm?resourceID=31

Upcoming Webinars

Connecting Educator Effectiveness and Common Core Implementation, Tuesday, March 13, 2:00-3:30 p.m. EDT

Special Webinar: International Summit on Preparation, Tuesday, March 20, 2:00 – 3:30 p.m. EDT

Regular monthly webinars, the second Tuesday of each month, from 2:00-3:00 or 3:30 p.m. ET

26

Planning for the Summit

May 2-4, Seattle, WA

National Summit on Educator Effectiveness

Special Preparatory Webinar: Coherence and Comprehensiveness: Using Your Theory of Action

April 10, 2:00-3:30 pm ET

27

Questions

If you have additional questions for the presenters, SCEE members can post them to: http://scee.groupsite.com/group/scee/discussion/topic/show/534964

28

http://scee.groupsite.com/group/scee/discussion/topic/show/534964

http://scee.groupsite.com/group/scee/discussion/topic/show/534964

Contact Information

Education Workforce InitiativeJanice Poda, [email protected]

ESEA Flexibility Toolkit for Principle 3Circe Stumbo, West Wind Education Policy/[email protected]

State Policy DatabaseValerie Nyberg, West Wind Education Policy/[email protected]

29




Thank you

30

The Council of Chief State School Officers State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness (SCEE) February 14, 2012 Implementing Your Educator Effectiveness.

Documents

implementation methods

implementation team

state implementation

effective outcomes

use of evidence

associate director

co director

outcomes years